Allahabad High Court
ANAND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Anand Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that it should be dismissed as not pressed and that the petitioner may file a fresh petition later. The State respondents, represented by their standing counsel, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, finding no opposition, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed. The judges also granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition if he wishes. The order was pronounced on 28 September 2026.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- procedural
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 25069 of 2026
Anand Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Yadav, Ruchi Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudeep Harkauli, Tejasvi Misra
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the
State respondents.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does
not want to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as
not pressed with the liberty to file a fresh petition.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents has no objection in
case the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the
aforesaid liberty.
(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
September 28, 2026
Sumit S
Digitally signed by :-
SUMIT SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…