Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JIWAN BIMA RASHRATIYA SAHKARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that the writ petition was infructuous and dismissed it.

Summary

The petitioner, Jiwan Bima Rashratiya Sahkari, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner’s counsel later moved that the petition should be dismissed as it had become infructuous. The standing counsel for the respondents did not object to this request. The Court considered the submission that the petition was no longer maintainable. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and vacated any interim order that had been in force.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition had become infructuous and therefore liable to be dismissed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • interim order vacated
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 25907 of 2021

                                    Jiwan Bima Rashratiya Sahkari
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Chandan Srivastava, Anil Kumar Rai,
                                                                      Greesh Kumar Malviya, Krishna
                                                                      Mohan Ojha, Prakash Chandra
                                                                      Srivastava, Rajendra Kumar Mishra,
                                                                      Vikas Srivastava, Vishnu Prakash,
                                                                      Vishnu Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Misra, Vineet
                                                                      Pandey

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                      HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. Shri Mahesh Kumar, holding the brief of Shri Vikas Srivastava, learned
                                    counsel for the petitioner, prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as
                                    having become infructuous.

                                    2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the dismissal of the writ
                                    petition as infructuous.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Mukesh Kr.




Digitally signed by :-
MUKESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.