Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT SAMUNDARI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that demolition cannot proceed without affording the petitioner a chance to submit a representation and be heard, and stayed the demolition pending such hearing.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Samundari Devi, challenged an order dated 23.07.2026 directing demolition of a structure on Plot No. 215 in Greater Noida, alleging that no prior notice was given. The respondents, the State of U.P. and the Greater Noida Authorities, contended that the demolition order itself served as a notice and that the petitioner could file a reply. The Court held that the petitioner must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard and allowed a two‑week period to submit a representation. It further directed that no demolition may take place until the representation is decided or for a period of three months from the date of the order, whichever is earlier. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of with the direction that the matter be decided after hearing all parties.

Issues considered

  • Whether a demolition order can be executed without prior notice to the affected party
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a hearing and opportunity to submit a representation before demolition

Subjects

  • demolition
  • notice
  • writ petition
  • representation
  • hearing
  • administrative law
  • property

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                                 WRIT - C No. - 29917 of 2026

                                    Smt Samundari Devi
                                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                              Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :   Prem Chandra, Sudhanshu Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :   Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C., Vineet Pandey

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                           HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                           HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. Heard Shri Sudhanshu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned
                                    Standing Counsel, and perused the record.

                                    2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any notice being issued to him, the
                                    order dated 23.07.2026 has been passed directing demolition of the construction
                                    existing over Plot No. 215 admeasuring 0.0421 Ha (504.16 Square Gaj), Village
                                    Ghanghaula, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Sadar, District- Gautam Budh Nagar.

                                    3. Learned counsel appearing for the Greater Noida Authorities, Sri Vineet Pandey,
                                    states that the instant order may be treated as a notice and that the petitioner may
                                    submit his reply thereto.

                                    4. In view of the aforesaid, we provide that, in case the petitioner submits a
                                    representation within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered
                                    and decided in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all
                                    the parties concerned, within a period of two months thereafter.

                                    5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    6. It is made clear that, till the decision on the representation is taken or for a period of
                                    three months from today, whichever is earlier no demolition shall be carried out, if the
                                    same has not already taken place.

                                    September 16, 2026
                                    vijay krishna
                                                                           (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.