Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

THE CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF UTTAR PRADESHversusUTTAR PRADESH CRICKET ASSOCIATION AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Summary

The petition filed by the Cricket Association of Uttar Pradesh was heard before a two‑judge bench. The respondent Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association and others filed a counter‑affidavit, which was taken on record. The petitioner was served with a copy of the counter‑affidavit and sought time to file a rejoinder. The court granted the requested time and listed the matter for further hearing on 18 May 2026, directing both parties to complete pleadings before the next date.

Subjects

  • procedural order
  • adjournment
  • pleadings

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 3329 of 2026

                                    The Cricket Association Of Uttar Pradesh
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association And 6 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          : Ramesh Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          : A.S.G.I., Anuj Srivastava, C.S.C.,
                                                                         Gaurav Bishan, Manjari Singh

                                    Court No. - 2
                                                     HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

                                    1. Shri Ramesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
                                    Standing Counsel for the State-respondent no.2, Shri Gaurav Bishan,
                                    learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 6 and Ms. Manjari Singh,
                                    learned counsel for the respondent no.7 are present.

                                    2. Shri Kartikeya Saran, learned Additional Advocate General has filed a
                                    counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1, the same is taken on
                                    record.

                                    3. A copy of the counter affidavit is handed over to the learned counsel
                                    for the petitioner. Time to file rejoinder has been sought.

                                    4. Accordingly, time as prayed for is granted.

                                    5. List this case on 18.05.2026.

                                    6. Both the parties are requested to ensure that the pleadings are
                                    completed on or before the next date of hearing.



                                                                (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    Sumit K.




Digitally signed by :-
SUMIT KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.