Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SALONIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The petition cannot be entertained unless the petitioner first obtains a Gazette notification of the name change as mandated by the Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011.

Summary

Petitioner Saloni filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the Union of India to correct her name in the Aadhaar database from ‘Sanoli’ to ‘Saloni’. The respondent argued that a mere representation is insufficient and that, under the Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011, the petitioner must first obtain a Gazette notification of the name change. After securing the Gazette notification, she must file an application with the regional Aadhaar office, which must then decide within six weeks. The court noted these procedural requirements and did not grant the relief sought. Consequently, the petition was disposed without ordering any change in the Aadhaar records.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner can compel correction of her name in Aadhaar records through a writ petition without first obtaining a Gazette notification under the Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011.

Legislation cited

  • Janhit Guarantee Act 2011

Subjects

  • Aadhaar
  • Name correction
  • Article 226
  • Janhit Guarantee Act
  • Gazette notification
  • Writ petition

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                WRIT - C No. - 34299 of 2026

                                    Saloni
                                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    Union Of India And Another
                                                                                                      .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Ram Awtar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   A.S.G.I., Rajesh Tripathi

                                    Court No. - 1
                                                       HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
                                                       HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

                                    2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution,
                                    petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent Nos. 2 to correct
                                    the name of the petitioner as 'Saloni' in place of 'Sanoli' in her Aadhaar
                                    records.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that a simple representation
                                    would not do the needful. He submits that as per the standing operating
                                    procedure provided under the Janhit Guarantee Act 2011, petitioner is
                                    required to first get a Gazette notification of her changed name as she
                                    wants and after Gazette notification she can get an application filed before
                                    the regional office of the respondent no. 2 to get her name changed in the
                                    Aadhaar records.

                                    4. After getting changed her name notified vide gazette notification,
                                    petitioner shall apply before competent authority namely respondent no. 2
                                    for change of name in her Aadhaar records, and if she moves any such
                                    application, that shall be disposed of by respondent no. 2 within a further
                                    period of six weeks.

                                    5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands
                                    disposed of.


                                                                         (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)
                                    September 17, 2026/S.Prakash



Digitally signed by :-
SHASHI PRAKASH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.