Allahabad High Court
SMT VIMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petitioner's claim was not maintainable and the writ petition was dismissed.
Summary
Smt. Vimla Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 34945 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed by the Collector. The petition sought relief against the Collector's decision, alleging that it was illegal or arbitrary. The Court examined the petitioner's claim and found it untenable, rejecting it by an order dated 20‑07‑2026. The Court directed that a copy of the Collector's order be served on the petitioner's counsel through the Standing Counsel. It further observed that, given the limited scope of the present petition, no further orders were necessary. The petitioner was permitted to file a fresh petition if she wishes to contest the Collector's order again.
Subjects
- Writ petition
- Administrative law
- Collector order
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 34945 of 2026
Smt Vimla Devi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brij Raj Verma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
The petitioner's claim has been rejected vide order dated 20.07.2026.
Let a copy of the papers carrying the order be supplied to the learned
counsel for the petitioner by the learned Standing Counsel forthwith.
Since the office of this petition is limited, no further orders are required to
be made in this petition. The petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the
order passed by the Collector through a fresh petition.
Consigned to record.
(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.)
October 1, 2026
Pratima
Digitally signed by :-
PRATIMA AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…