Allahabad High Court
AAKANSHA BAHUGUNA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioners, Aakansha Bahuguna and three others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The standing counsel for the respondents did not oppose this request. The learned judges considered the petitioners' prayer and the lack of objection. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, granting the petitioners liberty to file a fresh petition if they choose. The order was pronounced on September 17, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as not pressed
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 34967 of 2026
Aakansha Bahuguna And 3 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Divyanshu Nandan Tripathi, Utkarsh
Khanna
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the writ petition may be
dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the dismissal of the writ
petition.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with the
liberty prayed above.
(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
September 17, 2026
GS
Digitally signed by :-
GAUTAM SONI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…