Allahabad High Court
SMT UMESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to re‑file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Smt. Umesh Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw it, intending to file a fresh petition with the correct parties. The respondent State of U.P. and two other respondents, through their counsel, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of opposition. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to re‑file. No substantive merits of the original petition were addressed.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a writ petition before the High Court?
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- high court procedure
- civil procedure code
- petition dismissed
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35705 of 2026
Smt Umesh Sharma
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, Sudhanshu
Pratap Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vinayak Nath Singh
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ
petition and file afresh with writ petition impleading proper parties.
2. Sri Vinayak Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3
and learned Standing Counsel have no objection to the withdrawal of the
writ petition.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
as prayed for.
(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
September 16, 2026
Rakesh
Digitally signed by :-
RAKESH MEHTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…