Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT POONAM KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt Poonam Kumari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners on the revised call. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Atul Sreedharan and Hon'ble Vivek Saran. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The order was dated May 12, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                            WRIT - C No. - 36333 of 2024

                                    Smt Poonam Kumari And Another
                                                                                                      .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 5 Others
                                                                                                    .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   Manoj Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   C.S.C., Gyanendra Kumar Singh

                                    Court No. - 2
                                                         HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. None appears for the petitioner even in the revised call.

                                    2. The present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    May 12, 2026
                                    Fahad
                                                                           (Vivek Saran,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
FAHAD NIYAZ
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.