Allahabad High Court
KAMLESHWARI SINGH AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ No. 38399 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to pursue the petition. The court noted the absence of any representation and consequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was discharged. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Justices Ajit Kumar and Indrajeet Shukla on May 14, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is not prosecuted before the court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural law
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38399 of 2025
Kamleshwari Singh And 10 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Mahabir Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bindu Kumari, C.S.C.
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
1. List is being revised.
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)
May 14, 2026
S.P.
Digitally signed by :-
SANJAY PURI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…