Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AIMS GREEN AVENUE WELFARE ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The Aims Green Avenue Welfare Association filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39073 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the petition contained mistakes and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh one. The State’s standing counsel and the counsel for the contesting respondent did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, noting the unanimous consent, dismissed the writ petition as ‘not pressed’ while granting the petitioner liberty to approach the Court afresh. No substantive merits of the original claim were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • The Court may dismiss a writ petition as ‘not pressed’ when the petitioner withdraws it with the consent of the respondents.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal as not pressed
  • civil procedure
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                WRIT - C No. - 39073 of 2026

                                    Aims Green Avenue Welfare Association
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                   :   Lalit Kumar Misra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                   :   Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                         HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State
                                    respondents and Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel representing Greater
                                    Noida Industrial Development Authority are present.

                                    2. Upon being pointed out about the mistakes in the writ petition, learned
                                    counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present
                                    writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with the liberty
                                    to file a fresh petition.

                                    3. Learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the contesting
                                    respondent have no objection in case the writ petition is dismissed as not
                                    pressed.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the
                                    aforesaid liberty.



                                                                  (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    September 28, 2026
                                    Sumit S




Digitally signed by :-
SUMIT SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.