Allahabad High Court
ZAHEERUDDIN @ZAHEER MISTRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of, and the appeal filed by petitioner No.2 is to be decided within two months of the certified copy of this order.
Summary
Petitioner Zaheeruddin @Zaheer Mistri and another filed a writ petition challenging a sealing order dated 28 July 2026. The petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition and instead join an appeal filed under section 28(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 before the Commissioner, Agra. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority, urged that the appeal be decided expeditiously. The High Court, without examining the merits, directed that the appeal filed on 20 August 2026 be decided in accordance with law within two months of receiving a certified copy of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners may withdraw the writ petition and join the pending appeal under section 28(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973
- Whether the appeal must be decided expeditiously as per the respondents' request
Legislation cited
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- appeal
- Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act
- section 28(4)
- sealing order
- procedural law
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 39275 of 2026
Zaheeruddin @Zaheer Mistri And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Srivastava, Bajrang Lal
Srivastava, Priyanka Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dharmendra Singh Chauhan
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the
petitioner no.2 against the sealing order dated 28.7.2026, has filed an
appeal under section 28(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and
Development Act, 1973 before the respondent no.2. He states that he
would be withdrawing this writ petition and would be joining the appeal.
2. Sri Dharmendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the
Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority states that the appeal shall be
decided as expeditiously as possible.
3. Without going into the merits of the case, we provide that the appeal
filed by the petitioner no.2 on 20.8.2026 before the Commissioner,
Commissionerate Agra-respondent no.2 shall be decided in accordance
with law after hearing the parties concerned, within a period of two
months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.
4. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
September 29, 2026
GS
Digitally signed by :-
GAUTAM SONI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…