Allahabad High Court
GREEN VIEW HEIGHTS APARTMENT OWNERSversusGHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous because the matter has already been finally decided by the order dated 15 July 2026.
Summary
The petitioners, Green View Heights Apartment Owners, filed a writ petition challenging a complaint dated 18 July 2025 filed against the Ghaziabad Development Authority and others. The respondents informed the Court that the complaint had been adjudicated and an order was passed on 15 July 2026, a copy of which was supplied to the petitioner's counsel. The Court was also directed to provide the order to the counsel of a third respondent, GAV Developers Pvt. Limited. Upon confirming that the substantive dispute had been finally resolved by the order, the Court held that the writ petition no longer had any operative purpose. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. The judgment was delivered on 28 September 2026 by Judges Siddhartha Varma and Kunal Ravi Singh.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the underlying complaint has been adjudicated and an order passed.
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- order
- development authority
- apartment owners
- judicial review
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40366 of 2025
Green View Heights Apartment Owners
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Ghaziabad Development Authority And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gajendra Singh Arya, Shikhar Tandon
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Satish Kumar Tyagi, Tejasvi Misra
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Learned Counsel appearing for Ghaziabad Development Authority Sri
Tejasvi Misra states that the petitioner's objection to the complaint dated
18.7.2025 has been adjudicated upon and that an order has also been
passed thereafter on 15.7.2026. A copy of the order has also been
provided to the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2. A copy of the order be also provided to the Counsel for respondent no.3
- GAV Developers Pvt. Limited.
3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
September 28, 2026
Irshad
Digitally signed by :-
IRSHAD AHMAD SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…