Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AMINAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of, and the court directed the pending authority to decide the complaint within sixty days.

Summary

The petitioner, Amina, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief while a related complaint filed by her on 5 July 2025 before Respondent No.2 was still pending. The petitioner argued that the pending complaint should be decided before the writ petition proceeds. The court noted that the matter before Respondent No.2 had not yet been adjudicated. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition and directed Respondent No.2 to consider the pending complaint within sixty days of the order. No substantive merits of the writ were examined, and the petition was effectively stayed pending the other authority’s decision.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition should be entertained when the subject matter is pending before another authority
  • Whether the court can direct the pending authority to decide the complaint within a specified time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • pending complaint
  • court direction
  • administrative law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                          WRIT - C No. - 40956 of 2025

                                    Amina
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 5 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :    Mahesh Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :    C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 2
                                                      HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
                                                      HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for
                                    the State-respondents.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this
                                    petition is pending consideration before the respondent no.2, before whom
                                    the petitioner has filed a complaint dated 05.07.2025 which has not yet been
                                    decided.

                                    3. Under the circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with the
                                    request to the respondent no.2 to consider the complaint filed by the
                                    petitioner herein, within a period of sixty days from the date of
                                    communication of this order.

                                    May 14, 2026
                                    rkg
                                                                       (Vivek Saran,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.