Allahabad High Court
SABJI AADHTI ASSOCIATION THRU SECY. ANIL KUMAR GOEL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The Court directed respondent No. 6 to decide the petitioners' representation within eight weeks of the order.
Summary
The Sabji Aadhti Association filed a writ petition (WRIT‑C No. 61147 of 2014) seeking a direction to respondent No. 6 to decide a representation dated 27 January 2026. The petitioners, through counsel D.R. Chaudhary, requested the court to order the respondent to act on the representation within a reasonable time. Counsel for respondents No. 2‑6, appearing through Gaurang Dwivedi, raised no objection to the prayer. The Court permitted the petitioners to implead any necessary parties and directed respondent No. 6 to decide the representation within eight weeks of receiving a certified copy of the order. The petitioners were also directed to file a typed copy of the representation along with the certified order. The writ petition was consequently disposed with the specified directions.
Issues considered
- What direction, if any, should be issued to respondent No. 6 to decide the petitioners' representation dated 27 January 2026?
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- procedural direction
- High Court
- implementation of representation
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 61147 of 2014
Sabji Aadhti Association Thru Secy. Anil Kumar
Goel And Anr. .....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : D.R. Chaudhary
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., M.C.Chaturvedi, Satish
Mandhyan
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead necessary
party in the array of parties, during course of the day.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Gaurang Dwivedi,
learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 6.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed his
representation dated 27.1.2026 before respondent No.6 and direction may
be issued to decide the same.
4. Sri Gaurang Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2
to 6 has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the
petitioners.
5. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.6
to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 27.1.2026 within
maximum period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified
copy of this order. The petitioners are directed to file typed copy of
representation dated 27.1.2026 alongwith certified copy of this order.
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
May 12, 2026
P.P.
Digitally signed by :-
POONAM PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…