Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BHOLA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternative remedies.

Summary

The petitioners, Bhola and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners' counsel prayed to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative remedy available under law. The State's counsel did not object to this request. The Court, after noting the absence of objection, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition, granting the petitioners liberty to approach other legal avenues. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ
  • alternative remedy
  • high court procedure
  • civil litigation

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - C No. - 8079 of 2026

                                    Bhola And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 5 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Sanjay, Vinod Kumar Maurya
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   C.S.C., Suresh Singh

                                    Court No. - 2
                                                     HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed to withdraw the present
                                    writ petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy available in law.

                                    2. Shri Sumit Kumar, learned counsel for the State has no objection to the
                                    aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
                                    aforesaid liberty.


                                                                 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    Sumit K.




Digitally signed by :-
SUMIT KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.