Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

YOGESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that a petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request and therefore dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Yogesh Kumar Sharma and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel Ashish Srivastava, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue any other legal remedies. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal at that stage. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioners liberty to seek alternative remedies. The order was recorded in the presence of counsel for the respondents.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner at the stage of proceedings and the consequences thereof

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 8088 of 2026

                                    Yogesh Kumar Sharma And Another
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 7 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :   Ashish Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :   Arpan Kumar Pandey, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 2
                                                     HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with
                                    liberty to pursue such other remedies available to him under the law.

                                    2. Under the circumstances, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
                                    liberty to pursue such other alternative remedy available under the law.

                                    3. This order is passed in the presence of Sri Namit Srivastava, holding the
                                    brief for Sri Arpan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents.



                                                                 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    piyush




Digitally signed by :-
PIYUSH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.