Allahabad High Court
SUDHA MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek alternative remedy.
Summary
Petitioner Sudha Mishra filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative legal remedy. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing the parties, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to seek other remedies. The order was pronounced by Hon'ble Justices Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan on 19 March 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue alternative remedies
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- alternative remedy
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 8107 of 2026
Sudha Mishra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Brij Napit
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed to withdraw the present
writ petition with liberty to seek alternative remedy available in law.
2. Shri Abhishek Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing
Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel
for the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid liberty.
(Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
March 19, 2026
Sumit K.
Digitally signed by :-
SUMIT KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…