Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ILTIFAT HUSAIN and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.URBAN DEVELOPMENT LUCKNOW and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Holding

The court held that no cause of action survived and therefore dismissed the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court under the priority case category, but failed to appear before the court. The State respondents were represented by standing counsel. Upon reviewing the record, the court found that no cause of action remained in favor of the petitioners. Consequently, the court consigned the matter to the record and disposed of the petition. The petitioners were given liberty to file an application for recall, variation, or modification of the order if they believe a cause of action still exists.

Issues considered

  • Whether a cause of action subsists in the writ petition after the petitioners' non-appearance

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • cause of action
  • non-appearance
  • disposal
  • priority case
  • High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              LUCKNOW
                                                               WRIT - C No. - 8717 of 2021

                                     Iltifat Husain And Ors.
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Urban Development
                                     Lucknow And Ors.                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Manish Jauhari, Ambuj Kumar Bajpai,
                                                                        Shruti Sahu
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra, Shobhit
                                                                        Mohan Shukla

                                    Court No. - 3
                                                       HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
                                                       HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.

                                    1. The present writ petition has been appearing under the heading of
                                    "Priority Cases".

                                    2. None appears on behalf of the petitioners even in the revised call.

                                    3. Learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the State-respondents.

                                    4. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives,
                                    and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record.

                                    5. The writ petition is disposed of.

                                    6. In the event, the petitioners are of the view that the cause of action still
                                    survives, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file an application for
                                    recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law.



                                                                    (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)
                                    October 27, 2025
                                    Ashutosh




Digitally signed by :-
ASHUTOSH PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.