Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

M/S INTRAGENIX REMEDIESversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner M/s Intragenix Remedies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later decided not to pursue the matter and filed a Civil Miscellaneous Withdrawal Application. The petitioner's counsel, Tanmay Sadh, indicated the desire to withdraw, and the revenue counsel, Parv Agarwal, raised no objection. The Court considered the application and, finding no opposition, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with the Court granting liberty to approach the appropriate statutory remedy if needed. The order was pronounced on February 6, 2026 by Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Indrajeet Shukla.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition pending before the High Court can be withdrawn by the petitioner through a civil miscellaneous application

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil miscellaneous application
  • High Court
  • statutory remedy
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                          WRIT TAX No. - 7811 of 2025

                                    M/S Intragenix Remedies
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    Union Of India And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Nishant Mishra, Tanmay Sadh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : A.S.G.I., Dhananjay Awasthi,            Parv
                                                                      Agarwal, Shiv Kumar Pal

                                    Court No. - 3
                                                    HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
                                                    HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Sri Tanmay Sadh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner
                                    does not want to contest the matter and wants to withdraw the petition and in
                                    this regard, Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.04 of 2026 has been
                                    pressed.

                                    2. Sri Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue has no objection.

                                    3. Accordingly, the withdrawal application is allowed and consequently, the
                                    writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail statutory remedy
                                    in accordance with law.

                                    February 6, 2026
                                    Mohit
                                                             (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.