Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
2465 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The appellants, Jitendra Kumar and Shyam Babu Rai, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for offences arising from a case registered at Shahpur Police Station. They applied for …
The appellants, Gautam Kumar and Subodh Singh, were charged under IPC sections 323, 354, 504, 506, 509/34 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with a lathi, iron rod and fists, abusing him with caste slurs, and assaulting and …
The appellants were accused under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman and snatching her mobile phone on 3 August 2024. The Special Judge had rejected their anticipatory bail application. The appellants contended that the complaint …
The appellants, Suman Kumar Pandey and Manan Kumar Pandey, were accused of assaulting an informant and were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Special Court had rejected their application …
Akhilesh Singh appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge dated 21‑09‑2024 which rejected his application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …
The appellants, three members of the Verma family, appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting their anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had already taken …
The appellants, six members of the Yadav family, appealed against the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Araria, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged caste‑based assault and multiple offences under the IPC and the …
Chandan Kumar appealed against the order dated 16.08.2024 that denied him anticipatory bail in a case alleging kidnapping of the informant's daughter and caste‑based harassment under IPC sections 363, 366A, 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal challenging a Special Judge's order that rejected their anticipatory bail applications in a case involving alleged assault and caste slurs during a construction dispute under the Nal Jal Yojana. The prosecution had charged them under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, …
The petitioner, Ajay Ram (also known as Badal Kumar), was implicated in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 5.94 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from his residence. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that no incriminating material was …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was named in FIR No.191 of 2025 for allegedly taking part in an unlawful assembly that fired indiscriminately at the husband of an informant, resulting in his death. He filed an application for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and alleging that he was falsely …
Vikky Mistry applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS No.162 of 2024) alleging that he lured a woman via Facebook with a false promise of marriage, recorded her undressing, and circulated the video, thereby violating sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Sah, was implicated in a case (PS No.151 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act, including assault with a weapon causing grievous injury to the informant's mother. He applied for anticipatory bail, …
Shivchandra Ray and Vijay Ray applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 1163.7 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. The prosecution alleged their involvement, but the petitioners argued that no incriminating material …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 100 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from an open field. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered in connection with a case registered under …
Petitioner Nafis Alam sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Gaura PS Case No. 174 of 2025) alleging that he and a co-accused committed unnatural sexual acts with a ten‑year‑old boy and recorded the act on video. The offences alleged include sections 64(1) and 351(2)(3) of the …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Patel, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S., alleging that he was accused of kidnapping a minor girl for marriage on 5 January 2025. The prosecution’s case was based on a FIR lodged seven days after the alleged …
Bhantun Kumar Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing the parties, granted permission to …
Ugan Poddar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS Dhamdaha Case No. 201 of 2025) for assaulting Manoranjan Poddar with a lathi, causing two injuries, one grievous, under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due …
The petitioners – Indu Devi, Manoj Kumar Singh and their sons – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Bibhutipur No.454/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault and rioting. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had abused and assaulted …
The petitioners, Pawan Kumar and Rajnish Rai, were implicated in a violent incident on 24 July 2025 where they allegedly assaulted an informant and his family, robbed Rs. 50,000 and a gold ring, and inflicted knife injuries. Petitioner No.1 sought to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, which …
Bishwanath Mukhiya filed an anticipatory bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 17552 of 2026 before the Patna High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory …
The petitioner, Kapildev Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he and a co‑accused verbally abused the informant’s mother and forcibly took a child’s neckcloth, invoking multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting the incident …
The appellants, Md. Jamaluddin and Md. Salmuddin, were convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 147, 341 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, based on an alleged assault by an unlawful assembly armed with lathis. The prosecution relied on four witnesses but …
The petitioners, four men alleging to be agnates of the informant's maternal grandfather, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging conspiracy to grab 24 acres of land using a forged gift deed. The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., while the …
The petitioner, Pradeep Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging he shot an informant and caused firearm injury. The petitioner claimed innocence and alleged false implication, while the …
The petitioners, seven members of the Yadav family, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Jaynagar, Case No. 268 of 2019) where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant and his family with lathis, iron rods and to have stolen cash and jewellery, offences punishable under several …
The petitioner, Rajesh Majhi, was implicated in a case alleging kidnapping of a minor for marriage, with charges under Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The victim, however, gave a statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. denying any kidnapping …
The petitioners, Ashutosh Kumar and Sarita Sangam, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that they had abducted and assaulted a 10‑year‑old boy from the informant’s family and committed various offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The petitioners contended that the …
The petitioners, Ashutosh Kumar, Sarita Sangam and Baidya Nath Mishra, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging kidnapping, assault and sexual offences against a ten‑year‑old boy under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. They contended that the informant delayed …
Petitioners Suraj Ram and Prabhat Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case where they were alleged to have, along with others, assaulted the son of an informant, causing fourteen injuries and stealing Rs. 50,000, a gold locket and a mobile phone. The FIR charged them under several provisions of the …
The petitioner, Savitri Devi, an elderly woman, was named in a complaint (Case No. 679 of 2024) alleging forcible takeover of an ancestral house, demand for a Rs.5 lakh ransom, threats to sell the property, and looting of household items worth Rs.30,000. The complaint lists offences under multiple …
The petitioner, Vinod Yadav, father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 80, 85 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence, clean antecedents and that the primary accused – the husband – was already in …
The petitioner, Nikhat Praveen, a PDS shop owner, was implicated in a case alleging shortage of 312.42 quintals of rice and 18.42 quintals of wheat, purportedly amounting to black‑marketing of subsidised food grains under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 7 of the Essential …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that on 19‑08‑2025 a co‑accused fired at the informant's son, causing injury, and the …
Petitioners Pappu Kumar and his wife Rajani Devi, parents of alleged kidnapper Shubham Kumar, feared arrest in a case involving the kidnapping of a minor. They were implicated under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the POCSO Act, …
Savitri Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that she, along with other accused, killed the daughter‑in‑law for non‑payment of dowry, …
The petitioner, Ram Suresh Prasad, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.176 of 2025) for an alleged offence under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant argued that the petitioner had been declared an absconder and that proceedings under Section 84 of the BNSS …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where co-accused were found in possession of heroin and had named him as an associate. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in offences punishable under Sections 21(b), 22(b), 27(a) and 8(c) of the Narcotic …
Guddu Rai applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for the murder of an informant's son, alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution claims that Rai, along with other accused, abducted the victim, killed him and hung the body to simulate suicide. The …
The petitioner, Shivanand Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging that he had a sexual relationship with a minor, the informant’s sister, and that his alleged mental and physical torture led her to commit suicide. The prosecution charged him under sections 103(1), …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 314, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, created nuisance and panic when an informant attempted to …
The petitioner, Baiju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the son of an informant went missing and that co‑accused Harikesh Kumar, Krishna and Naveen, in their confessional statements, implicated the …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant and opened fire, injuring three …
Petitioners Priyanka Kumari and her husband Pawan Kumar, the daughter and son‑in‑law of the deceased Tiwari Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that on 16‑04‑2025 the accused assaulted and poisoned …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar Pandey, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a fraud case involving alleged collusion to sanction a Rs. 10,00,000 loan through forged documents. The prosecution’s informant, an office manager at Bajaj Finance, alleged that the petitioner and other accused …
The petitioners, Jivlal Yadav and his wife Sukanti Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a kidnapping case where they were alleged to have abducted a minor for marriage. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioners, were involved, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of …
The Patna High Court heard three appeals arising from the same 2004 Dehri police case in which the appellants were convicted under IPC Sections 399 (dacoity) and 402 (robbery) and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine. The prosecution’s case relied on two police witnesses and …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sasaram, for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code based on a police raid that recovered a pistol, cartridges and a knife. They appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to examine the investigating officer, …
The petitioner, Udgar Kumar Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail in a Mahila Police Station case (No. 56 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 69, 89, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the petitioner facilitated an abortion of the informant’s pregnancy and …
Ashok Kumar, a wholesale medicine dealer, was alleged to have received medicines worth Rs. 30,675 from the complainant and failed to pay the amount, leading to a complaint under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Anticipating arrest, the petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, stating his …
Petitioner Krishna @ Kanhaiya Kumar was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several IPC sections and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, including an alleged attempt to outrage a minor's modesty and subsequent assault on the informant. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated due to …
The petitioner, Khokan Swarnakar, sought anticipatory bail in a customs case alleging offences under Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act for alleged involvement in gold smuggling. The prosecution’s case is based on statements of co‑accused who claimed they purchased seized gold …
Mukesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for murder and illegal possession of a firearm under Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that Paswan, along with others, killed the informant's brother over a …
Petitioners Parma Nand Kewat and Karun Kewat sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged alleging they assaulted the minor daughters of Meena Devi, invoking IPC sections 341, 323, 354 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioners contended that the allegations were false, fabricated in …
The petitioners, Brijmohan Kumar and Aman Kumar, were charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly misappropriating 1,170.25 quintals of paddy worth Rs 27,20,831.25. They applied for bail, asserting innocence and stating that Brijmohan had already deposited …
The petitioners, Arti Devi and Chandra Kala Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, relating to the alleged kidnapping of a minor. …
The petitioner, Sunil Jha, was named in an FIR for the murder of the informant's brother, alleged to have been committed with a firearm over a land dispute. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming he was innocent and that the disputed land had already been sold in 2022, leaving no motive for …
The petitioner, Md. Arif Hussain, sought anticipatory bail in a theft case registered under Section 305 of the B.N.S. The FIR did not name him; his alleged involvement stemmed solely from a co‑accused’s confessional statement. No stolen articles were found in his possession and he has a clean …
Vishwanath Paswan applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a murder arising from a land dispute. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy involving the accused and unknown persons, but Paswan was …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2589 of 2021, which had been dismissed on 28 June 2022 for non‑prosecution. The High Court examined the reasons furnished by the petitioner for the lapse. Finding merit in the petitioner's …
Petitioner Sanjeev Nayak filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 7886 of 2025, which had been dismissed on 02-09-2025 for non‑prosecution. The petitioner argued that the dismissal was premature and requested the case be reinstated. The High Court examined whether a …
The petitioner, Soni Kumari, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24539 of 2025, which had been dismissed on 21-11-2025 for non‑prosecution. The High Court examined the reasons furnished by the petitioner for the lapse. Finding the explanations satisfactory, the …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Danda village, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 50429 of 2016, which had been dismissed on 1 December 2022 on the ground of non‑prosecution. The issue before the court was whether the …
The petitioners, five members of the Choudhary family, were directed by the court to surrender and furnish bail bond in a criminal miscellaneous case pending before the Patna High Court. They filed a petition seeking modification of the order dated 09‑05‑2024 to obtain additional time for surrender. …
Petitioner Sanjay Singh filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 67130 of 2022, which had been dismissed on 22-12-2022 for non‑prosecution. The High Court examined the reasons furnished by the petitioner for the lapse. The Court held that the dismissal could be set …
The petitioners, three brothers, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 08.01.2026 that prescribed a period for their surrender and furnishing of bail bond. The court considered their request for additional time and conditions for bail. It granted …
The petitioner, Nagendra Yadav, filed an application seeking modification of a prior order dated 13‑11‑2025 that had extended the time allowed for his surrender in a criminal case. The petitioner argued for additional time to surrender and to furnish a bail bond. The court examined the reasons …
Parma Sah was convicted under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 22(b) and 23(b) of the NDPS Act for possession of cannabis seized from his motorcycle. He appealed, arguing that the police failed to record prior information in writing, did not inform a superior officer, and did not seal or inventory the seized …
Petitioner Nandlal Prasad Yadav, the informant, filed an application seeking modification of the order dated 16‑05‑2019 that had quashed the cognizance of a case against several accused. He argued that the order was passed without hearing him or giving notice. The State and the accused opposed, …
Petitioner Prashant Kumar filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 70882 of 2024, which had been dismissed on 20 August 2024 for failing to comply with a peremptory order dated 22 October 2024. The peremptory order had granted the petitioner one week to file requisites …
The petitioner, Murari Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 8 and 20(B)(ii)C of the NDPS Act after co‑accused Bihari Kumar’s seizure of 17 litres of codeine cough syrup and his confession naming the petitioner. The petitioner argued that no incriminating article was found in his possession …
The petitioners, Pappu Yadav and Phunnu Yadav, were implicated in a case registered under Sections 20 and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged illegal cultivation of ganja. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that no incriminating article was …
The petitioner, Bandi Shankar Kumar, owner of M/s Sai Enterprises, was implicated in a case alleging misappropriation of CMR rice under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The prosecution alleged that the rice mill failed to supply the required CMR …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 302, 504 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that a dispute escalated into a violent assault on the victim's father, resulting in death, with specific accusations …
The petitioners, Ashok Paswan and Shambhu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the accused, along with many unknown persons, obstructed a road by placing a dead body there and misbehaved with female police …
The petitioners, Hasan Raja, Abdul Khalique and Md. Saddam Hussain, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 140(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They were accused of abducting the wife and child of an informant, but the informant later reported that the …
The petitioners, a group of relatives, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that they were likely to be arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. relating to kidnapping, conspiracy, and other offences. The prosecution alleges that the informant's son was married to …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for allegedly misappropriating food grains via an e‑POS machine. The prosecution alleged that he forged thumb impressions of 82 ration card holders to …
The petitioner, Ranvir Kumar, was implicated in a criminal case (PS case No.6, 2025) for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2) and 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, based on a complaint by Dauli Devi, who claimed that the petitioner had sexually exploited her for three years under the …
The petitioner, Fattu @ Triveni Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged murder of the informant's brother. The deceased was found dead and the informant alleged that the petitioner, along with …
The petitioner, Abhay Pratap, feared arrest in a case initially registered under Section 140(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, later amended to include Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2). He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged from the confessional statement of …
The petitioner, Raja Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging his participation in a violent assault that led to the death of an informant's husband. The FIR listed several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, but the petitioner argued that the accusations …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, where the prosecution alleged that he kidnapped a minor girl. The victim, aged 17, was later recovered and, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, …
The petitioner, Lalan Yadav, was implicated in an FIR alleging that he stabbed an informant, with charges under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence, that the injuries were simple, and that he has a …
The petitioners Rahul Kumar, Sunil Prajapati and Kanhai Prajapati applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault and robbery under several sections of the B.N.S. Sunil Prajapati was already arrested, so his application was withdrawn. The State opposed bail, citing specific accusations and …
The petitioner, Narayan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for the alleged recovery of 75 kg of ganja from a truck. He argued that he was neither the driver nor the owner of the vehicle and …
The petitioner, Jhunjhun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he was involved in extortion calls amounting to Rs. 10 lakh, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he neither owned nor controlled the mobile numbers …
Petitioners Md. Sabir Khan and Md. Farid Khan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple IPC offences arising from a land dispute. The FIR alleged that they, along with others, assaulted an informant, but the petitioners contended that no specific overt act was alleged …
Sonu Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a robbery case under Section 392 of the IPC. The FIR did not originally name him; his name surfaced only through the confessional statement of co‑accused Manoj Yadav. No other material evidence, such as recovery of …
Vishal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS No. 503/2025) alleging assault on an informant with an iron rod, lathi and belt, under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged the assault occurred on 4 August 2025, while the petitioner …
The petitioners, three women from Nakta Diyara, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that they demanded a dowry of Rs.5,00,000 and a motorcycle, and that they strangulated and burnt the deceased’s …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging his involvement in offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act, including attempted murder, assault, and illegal possession of a firearm. The prosecution’s case centered on the actions …
The petitioner, Stuti Kumar, was accused of firing upon the knee of an informant's grandson, causing grievous injury, under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, a ward Sachiv, was alleged to have illegally withdrawn Rs 48,000 from a Panchayat account, attracting charges under Sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the withdrawal was a bona‑fide mistake, had already returned the full amount, and …
The petitioners, who are the mother‑in‑law, brother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with other accused, …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No. 345 of 2022) under Sections 382 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that three assailants looted Rs. 60,000 at gunpoint and later left the stolen motorcycle at the petitioner's …
The petitioner, Raja Kumar, was implicated in an assault case arising from a land dispute, with the prosecution alleging that he and others assaulted an informant and his son on 14 September 2024. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that both parties inflicted injuries on each other and that …
Tarik Ali Ansari filed an anticipatory bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.13728 of 2026 before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an …
The petitioner, Ashraf Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (S. Case No. 235 of 2025) alleging an offence under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had a sexual relationship with a married woman, exploited her, and …
Petitioners Chandan Thakur and Ratan Thakur sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Case No. 100 of 2025) alleged that they inflicted grievous injuries on the brother of an informant, with one cutting the abdomen with a razor and the other stabbing with a knife. The injuries were medically certified …
The petitioners, Deepak Kumar and Bittu Singh, filed anticipatory bail applications in a case involving alleged assault under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Deepak Kumar's application was withdrawn after his arrest. Bittu Singh claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations were …
The petitioner, Binita Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after the State alleged she forged documents to acquire a house allotted by the Bihar State Housing Board, invoking Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner contended that the house was lawfully …
Sharwan Kumar was implicated in a case alleging the preparation of forged Aadhaar cards and birth certificates at King Photo Shop, based on the confession of co‑accused Saurav Kumar who named him as the mastermind. The petitioner, a student with a clean record, denied any involvement, stating that …
The petitioners, members of the Mehra family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 60 litres of illegal chullai liquor and four distilling equipments, and for assaulting police during a raid. The prosecution claimed …
The appellant, Amritpal Singh, was convicted by the Sessions Court for dowry death under IPC Sections 304B, 498A and 201, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, contending that the prosecution failed to prove the three essential ingredients of Section 304B and relied solely on a …
Sachin Kumar Das filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Anjani Devi. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Das, failed to appear despite repeated notices. The State’s counsel was present throughout. The Court observed that the petitioner did not …
The appellants, four Mahato individuals, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 504/34 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing a co‑villager while using caste slurs. The Special Judge had rejected their anticipatory bail …
The appellant, Dilip Rajvanshi, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly participating in extortion of liquor manufacturers and assaulting the husband …
Hemant Kumar Verma was charged under several IPC offences (sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506) and under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va)). He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. Subsequently, he was …
The appellant, Jageshwar Mahto, was charged under several IPC sections (341, 447, 323, 354, 504/34) and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. On appeal, the respondent (Manti Devi) argued …
The appellants, Prince Kumar and Pushkar Kumar, were charged under several IPC provisions and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, abusing him with caste slurs, and snatching his gold chain. They contended that the dispute was a …
The appellant, Lalita Raut, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 366A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after a complaint was lodged. The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge‑cum‑SC/ST Special Court rejected the bail, prompting …
The appellant, Md. Sakil, appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, theft of jewellery, and caste-based abuse under various IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant with lathi and …
The appellants were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant's children with weapons and caste slurs on 10 February 2018. They sought anticipatory bail, which was …
The appellants, Pappu Yadav and Ajay Yadav, appealed against the order of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Special Court, Saran, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …
The appellant, a 16‑year‑old juvenile, was charged under IPC sections 363 and 366A and POCSO Act section 8 for kidnapping, robbery and rape of a minor. The trial court denied his bail application, citing the seriousness of the offences, without considering the specific provisions of the Juvenile …
The appellant, Rana Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under Sections 341, 323, 384, 504, 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the SC/ST Act. The Special Judge had already taken cognizance of the case on 21.02.2017. The State opposed the bail, arguing that anticipatory bail was not …
The appellant, Bibhash Kumar, was charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering the informant's room, verbally abusing him on caste grounds, assaulting him, and destroying Panchayat office documents. He sought …
The appellants, three villagers, were charged under IPC sections 504, 341, 323/34 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing a caste name, demanding commission and assaulting the respondent's mother during a construction project. The FIR, filed …
The appellant, Seema Kumari, was charged under IPC sections 504, 506/34 and the SC/ST Act for allegedly abusing an informant with caste-based slurs. The Special Judge had rejected her anticipatory bail application. On appeal, counsel argued that no assault occurred, the incident was not in public …
The appellants, Brijendra Sao, Bijay Sao and Dipul Sao, were charged under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting informant Vimal Paswan and his son during a land‑possession dispute. They applied for …
The appellants, Ram Vriksh Yadav and Pankaj Yadav, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 379/34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and stealing jewellery and cash. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge, …
The appellant, Mantu Yadav, was charged under Sections 304 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant by caste name and erecting an electric wire that caused the death of the informant's son and nephew. The …
The appellants were charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his wife, using weapons, verbally abusing them by caste name, and stripping the wife of her mangalsutra. The prosecution alleged the …
Manjesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a violent attack on a brick kiln where several workers were assaulted and one was killed. The informant, Umesh Singh, alleged that the accused, identified through CCTV footage, participated in the assault, leading to charges under the Bihar Negotiable …
The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman, abusing her by caste name, and stealing her gold earrings and nose ring. The FIR was lodged …
Jaibu Mahton and Mohan Mahto appealed against the order dated 16‑10‑2023 that denied them anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault with an iron rod and caste‑based slurs under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and SC/ST Act 3(i)(r)(s). The appellants contended they were innocent, asserting the case …
The appellants, four individuals, were charged with offences including assault, robbery and caste‑based violence under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that on 14‑11‑2022 they attacked a SC/ST woman and her husband, …
The appellant, Bantan Kahar, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and several provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the alleged murder of a woman’s son. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Additional District and Sessions Judge. The appellant …
The appellant, Ranjeet Kumar Singh, was charged with offences under several IPC sections (323, 425, 426, 379, 506) and Sections 3 and 6 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had taken cognizance of the case and rejected his prayer for …
The appellant, Nand Kishore Singh, filed a criminal appeal and a bail petition before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 19-03-2026, the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing arguments, granted the request to withdraw the appeal. …
The appellant, Binod Kumar Singh, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substitution (B.N.S.) Act, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and his bail application was rejected by a lower court. He contended that he was merely …
The appellant, Md. Naushad Rijwi, was charged in a complaint case for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging assault and caste-based abuse of the complainant. The appellant contended that the allegations were false, …
The petitioner, Birbal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The FIR described a marriage function incident where co‑accused opened fire, causing a firearm injury to the informant, but did …
The petitioner, Rinku Kumari Deo Pujan Singh, was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B for allegedly securing a Panchayat Teacher post using forged documents. Fearing arrest, he offered to refund the salary he received in 24 monthly installments. The High Court considered the …
The petitioners, Jibrail Kuraisi and Nasruddin Kuraisi, were implicated in a FIR alleging illegal operation of a slaughterhouse dealing in cow flesh, violating Sections 429, 153(A), 295(A), 34 of the IPC, Section 11 of the Animal Cruelty Act, 1960 and Section 345 r/w 429 of the Bihar Municipal Act, …
Sunita Devi, former Mukhiya of Shivpur Gram Panchayat, faced arrest in a case alleging mis‑utilisation of funds allocated for the Chief Minister’s Nal Jal Yojana, with charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 and 34. She contended that she merely transferred the sanctioned amount to various wards by …
Petitioner Ramdeo Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case arising from a land dispute where he was alleged to have participated in an assault on the informant and others. The prosecution charged him under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The …
The appellant, Shri Niwas Singh, was convicted under IPC Sections 307, 353 and 149 for his alleged participation in a firing incident during a police raid on a baraat on 25 September 1997. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of police witnesses, some of whom gave contradictory statements, …
Bablu Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, and it was noted that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case. The State was represented by counsel Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. The court observed the absence of …
Petitioners Ravi Bind and Disco Kumar were accused of assaulting an informant with an iron rod and lathi, and also assaulting the informant's husband and daughter, leading to a FIR under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, simple …
The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with other accused, tortured and eventually …
The petitioner, Anarul Hak, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim was later recovered and, in a statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, denied the kidnapping and …
Petitioners Paras Ram and Lalan Ram were accused of assaulting relatives of an informant, involving alleged theft of jewelry, a mobile phone and cash. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, lack of specific overt acts, minor injuries to victims, and a clean antecedent. The State …
The petitioner, Reshav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109, 140, 111 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 16 September 2025 the accused attempted to kill the petitioner, but the petitioner was not named in the …
The petitioner, Bhim Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 25(9) of the Arms Act for allegedly supplying a pistol to co‑accused Amarjeet Chaudhary. The prosecution’s case …
The petitioners, three residents of Raghopur Pashchami, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that petitioners 1 and 2 assaulted an informant with an iron rod causing simple injuries, while petitioner 3 assaulted the informant’s brother causing grievous injury. The case involved …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS Case No. 298 of 2022) involving kidnapping of a minor girl for the purpose of marriage. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with others, abducted the child and solemnized her …
The petitioner, Umesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged rape, extortion, and the transmission of obscene photographs, with charges under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(E) and 67(A) of the Information Technology …
Five individuals from Pokhraira, Muzaffarpur, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 354, 307, 504 and 34 alleging assault and theft of a mangalsutra. They contended that the case was a fabricated retaliation against an earlier complaint they had filed, and that the …
The petitioner, a ward member of Koriyawan Gram Panchayat, was charged under Sections 316(2) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly withdrawing Rs. 1,43,000 from a scheme fund meant for the Chief Minister Rural Nal‑Jal Scheme. He contended that the previous ward member had handed …
Petitioner Abdul Ansari sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging that he established a physical relationship with the informant under the false pretext of marriage, later refusing to marry her, and allegedly assaulting her while she was eight months pregnant. The …
The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application after a FIR alleged that they forcibly entered the informant’s house, assaulted him and his family, and stole valuables, invoking Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. Petitioners 1‑4 claimed innocence, citing a petty …
Petitioner Parma Patel sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 103 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the alleged murder of an informant’s husband. The informant alleged that the petitioner and other accused had lured her husband and killed him, but the …
The petitioner, Aftab Alam, was accused of dowry harassment and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from his marriage to the complainant. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in the complaint case. The petitioner offered to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. 3000 to …
Petitioners Parmeshwar Mahto and his sons were implicated in a FIR arising from a land dispute that led to an altercation with the informant's family. The FIR alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault and criminal intimidation. The petitioners applied …
Jogendra Pandit sought anticipatory bail after learning that a raid on co-accused Ramnath Yadav's house recovered illegal arms and Yadav's confessional statement implicated Pandit as an associate. The petitioner argued he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating article was found in his …
Surendra Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR, filed by an informant, alleged that co‑accused Shivam Kumar and Sonu Kumar had kidnapped the informant's minor daughter …
The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar, Narendra Kumar Yadav and Anuj Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging their participation in an assault on an informant and his brother on 31 July 2025 during an election‑related dispute. The FIR, filed under multiple provisions of the …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, a former Gram Panchayat Secretary, was implicated in a case (P.S. Case No. 42 of 2021) for alleged embezzlement of funds allocated under the Nal Jal Yojana. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 420, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner applied for …
The petitioner, Md. Alam, a teacher, was accused of taking Rs. 5,50,000 from an informant on a promise to return it, and subsequently raping her, photographing the act, and threatening to release the images. The case was registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar Verma, was implicated in a case (No. 309 of 2025) for offences under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 132, 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, arising from an incident where he and co‑accused allegedly stole electricity and assaulted a raiding team, causing …
Petitioner Ashfaq Alam was named in an FIR alleging that he stabbed his neighbour, causing grievous injuries, and was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a petty dispute that led to mutual injuries. The State opposed the bail, …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning the disappearance of a 15‑year‑old girl, the informant’s daughter. The girl’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita …
The petitioners, Shyam Sundar Sonar and Rita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for alleged kidnapping of an informant's daughter. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with other accused, abducted the …
Anup Kumar Shah applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry harassment case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that Shah, as the husband, participated in torturing …
The petitioner, Abhiram Kumar, feared arrest in a murder case registered under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., where the victim was the husband of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, committed the murder, but there were no eyewitnesses and the only …
The petitioners, Ravis Kumar Raju and Pramod Kumar Sharma, were arrested in a case registered under Sections 409, 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They filed a petition seeking provisional bail, fearing continued detention. The High Court examined the nature of the offences, the amount of …
The petitioners, three agnates from Supaul, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where they were named in an FIR alleging assault with deadly weapons and theft. The prosecution alleged that all accused, including the petitioners, attacked an informant and his family, with petitioner No.2 …
Leela Devi, the grandmother of a deceased victim, feared arrest in a case involving alleged kidnapping and murder under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case was based largely on information from a single informant, Pramod Kumar, and did not include any direct …
The petitioners, Suresh Mahto and Avinash Kumar, were accused of assaulting individuals with a weapon (Hasuli) under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed innocence, stating the incident arose from a petty village dispute resulting in simple injuries on both sides. The State …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita was lodged by an informant alleging that he had deceived her with a false promise of marriage and subsequently engaged in sexual relations. The petitioner contended that the …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar, husband of the complainant, was charged under IPC sections 498A, 323, 420 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 for alleged dowry harassment and assault. He contended that the case stemmed from a petty family dispute, that he had a clean antecedent, and that the matter …
Petitioner Rahul Singh, husband of the complainant, was charged under Sections 498A and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry harassment and fraud. He contended that the case stemmed from a petty family dispute, he had a clean antecedent, and the matter was triable by a magistrate. Relying …
Petitioners Rekha Devi and Saroj Rai were implicated in a dowry death case under Sections 80, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that they were innocent, that the FIR indicated a suicide, and that the allegations against them were vague and over‑broad. The State …
The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that they brutally assaulted an informant and her husband, looted cash and ornaments, and were charged under multiple IPC sections. The petitioners contended that the case was false, arising from a land …
Akshay Kumar Singh, a former data entry operator, was charged with misappropriating Rs. 46,70,550 of motor vehicle tax and faced charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence and blaming another individual, Ajay Kumar Singh, …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 378 of 2025) alleging kidnapping of the minor daughter of an informant, under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail, contending his innocence and …
The petitioner, Sibodh Singh, was accused of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, stemming from an alleged molestation and threat to a minor. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 364, 364A, 368, 367 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that co‑accused had assaulted an informant, demanded money and forged a …
The petitioners, four villagers from West Champaran, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging assault, looting and firing of a pistol under numerous sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed the case was fabricated due to a long‑standing land dispute and …
The petitioners, Yashodhara Devi and Kumar Rahul, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS No. 50 of 2025) alleging assault, robbery, and other offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners attacked an informant with a farsa and iron …
The petitioner, Arjun Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting an informant by pelting bricks and stones. The State opposed the bail, contending the allegations constitute offences. The …
Dilip Kumar, the registered owner of a pickup van seized for allegedly transporting eight cows illegally, was charged under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 11(3)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. He contended that he was unaware of the nature of the …
The petitioners—Geeta Devi, Deepak Sah and Manisha Devi—sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. alleging that Manisha Devi’s alleged illicit relationship and subsequent events led to the suicide of a son of the informant. The …
Petitioners Rakesh Singh (Petitioner No.1) and Rupesh Kumar (Petitioner No.3) applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (B.N.S.) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a forced entry, assault on an informant and his wife, …
The petitioners – Usha Devi, Manti Devi, Rohit Shah and Ram Kumar Shah – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging dowry harassment and murder of a woman. The prosecution alleged that the deceased’s husband, Pramod Shah, along …
Mantu Kumar Mishra, a government servant, was implicated in a dowry death case under Sections 85, 80, 92 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with other accused, demanded additional dowry and failed to provide medical care, …
Petitioners Pradeep Kumar Choudhari and Pankaj Kumar Singh, former PDS dealers, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged they withheld foodgrains from beneficiaries and engaged in black‑marketing of wheat and rice, violating sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Essential Commodities …
The petitioner, Hemant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS No. 139 of 2025) alleging his participation in a mob that used a JCB to demolish the informant's house, causing damage to motorcycles, a laptop and a bed, and demanding extortion. The prosecution alleged …
The petitioner, Ranjita Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (No. 9222(C) of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a fraudulent sale deed of land. The complainant claimed that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, induced her to pay …
The petitioner, Laddu Sai, husband of the deceased, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry death case (PS Case No.27 of 2025) where he was accused under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 352, 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, killed his wife for …
Petitioner Pawan Kumar, a field officer of Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd., was implicated in a FIR alleging fraud and misappropriation of Rs. 3,88,819 collected from 18 customers, leading to charges under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming …
The petitioner, Abhay Bhushan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he had entered into a physical relationship with the informant under a false promise of marriage and subsequently refused to marry, invoking sections 64(1), 83, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya …
The petitioners, Nawab Kumar and Niranjan Sah, were implicated in a FIR (Muffasil PS Case No.525 of 2025) alleging assault on the informant and his sons using an iron rod and a farsa, invoking multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioners contended they were innocent, claiming …
The petitioners, Nagina Pd. Yadav, Manoj Rai and Manager Pd. Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that they, along with unknown persons, assaulted an informant with a knife and stole gold lockets worth Rs. 42,000. They claimed innocence, asserting that the case was fabricated due to a …
Petitioners Pradeep Kumar Choudhari and Pankaj Kumar Singh, former PDS dealers, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged they withheld foodgrains from beneficiaries and engaged in black‑marketing of wheat and rice, violating sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Essential Commodities …
Jamshed Ali was charged in a Kadwa police case for kidnapping and molesting the minor daughter of an informant, offenses alleged under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The victim’s statement, recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, corroborated the prosecution’s version. The …
