Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
651 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
Vinod Ram filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending application and to be allowed to raise all points at the time of framing of charge. The petitioner’s counsel requested liberty to withdraw, and the court considered the request. The bench, after …
The petitioner, Kapleshwar Rai, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking liberty to raise all points at the time of framing of charge. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to raise those points later. The Court considered …
The petitioners, Pawan Singh and Pramod Singh, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from PS case No. 377 of 2022. Their counsel sought permission to withdraw the application and to raise any points at a later stage. The Hon'ble Justice Praveen Kumar granted the …
The petitioners Guddu Singh and co‑accused filed an application seeking liberty to withdraw the present application and to raise all points at the time of framing of charge. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners requested permission for this withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, …
The petitioner, Deepak Singh, was facing charges in a criminal case (PS Case No.267 of 2010) in Lakhisarai. He filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the proceedings, citing the efflux of time in framing charges. The primary issue was whether the court could allow the withdrawal of the …
Nagendra Yadav filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all pleaded grounds and any other grounds at the time of charge framing. The petitioner’s counsel requested this liberty, and the State’s counsel and the …
The petitioners filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to raise all points at the time of framing of charge. Their counsel requested permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise those points later. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal of …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, filed an application seeking quashing of the FIR registered against him. The trial court had already taken cognizance of the offence and rejected his earlier discharge petition. Consequently, the petitioner moved this Court to withdraw the quash‑FIR application, …
Mukesh Kumar filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6593 of 2024 arising from PS case No. 337 of 2022. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage of the trial. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
Manjit Yadav filed an application seeking liberty to withdraw the present application and to raise all points at the time of framing of charge in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission for withdrawal, arguing that the issues could be addressed later. The Court, …
The petitioners, comprising Sudish Narayan Singh and family members, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar and Dhoop Narayan Singh. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the …
The petitioners Govind Singh and Sarita Devi filed an application in the Criminal Miscellaneous proceeding arising from PS case No.179 of 2020. They sought permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage in the trial. The learned counsel for …
The petitioner, Sunita Sharma, filed an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a refusal of an order. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the application, citing the passage of time and the pending trial court judgment. …
The petitioner, Raja Kumar, filed an application in the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the same, citing that the passage of time had rendered it infructuous. The petitioner requested liberty to raise all points at the appropriate stage of the trial. The Court, after hearing counsel, …
The petitioners, Ram Singar Singh and family, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to raise all points, including a ground, at the time of framing of charge in a criminal case. Counsel for the petitioners requested permission to withdraw the application so that the points could be …
The petitioners, namely Md. Israil, Jamila Khatoon, Anwar Hussain and Saiful Khatoon, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.12529 of 2024 arising from PS case No.19 of 2020 in Sheohar. They later approached the Patna High Court seeking the court’s permission to withdraw that application. …
The petitioners Vijay Kishore Singh, Vishal Kumar Singh and Shama Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Dr. Sonali Suman. During the hearing on 16-03-2026, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the parties had …
The petitioners, Sabiha Bano and Syed Qadir Karim, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous application while reserving the right to raise all grounds later in the trial. The learned counsel argued that charges had already been framed against them, making a …
The petitioners, Kamar Nigar and Syed Fahim Ur Rahman, were charged in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.8337 of 2024) arising from a 2022 police case. They filed an application seeking permission to withdraw that application and to be allowed to raise all grounds at a later stage of the trial. The …
Petitioner Yogendra Prasad Singh filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding and sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to raise all points at the time of framing of charge. The Court, after hearing, granted the permission to withdraw. …
The petitioners, Ram Yadav and Savita Devi, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking relief related to the framing of charges in a criminal case. Their counsel, Mr. Raghav Prasad, requested to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all points raised therein and any …
The petitioner, Shio Paswan, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. Counsel for the petitioner requested liberty to file an appropriate application thereafter. The Court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the …
Petitioners Sanjay Singh and Anirudh Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court's approval for the withdrawal. The court considered the request and …
In a criminal miscellaneous proceeding (No.11759 of 2024) arising from a 2019 complaint, petitioners Sanjay Singh and Anirudh Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court. The petitioners later sought to withdraw the application, contending that the lapse of time had rendered it …
The petitioner, Irshad Alam, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous proceeding. Counsel Manohar Alam appeared on behalf of the petitioner and requested the court's permission to withdraw. The Hon'ble Justice Praveen Kumar allowed the petitioner's …
The petitioners – Dhananjay Kumar, Rakesh Sharma, Pappu Sharma and Amit Kumar – filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking liberty to raise all points at the time of framing of charge in a case pending before the Patna High Court. They later moved the court for permission to withdraw that …
The petitioner, Amit Das, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the court’s permission to withdraw. The Hon’ble Justice Praveen Kumar granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, Ramdeo Singh and his sons, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Mukesh Kumar. During the hearing on 16-03-2026, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after granting permission, dismissed the …
The petitioner, Manju Devi, filed an application before the Patna High Court. Her counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request. Accordingly, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issues on the merits were considered. The order was …
The petitioners filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous case seeking permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all available points and grounds at the time of framing of charge. The court granted the petitioners' request, allowing the withdrawal with the …
Petitioner Yashoda Devi filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous case. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, requested the court’s leave to withdraw. The Hon’ble Justice Praveen Kumar allowed the request. Consequently, the application was …
The petitioner, Sri Ram Rai, filed an application in the High Court of Patna. During the pendency of the application, the sole petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application on the ground that it had become infructuous due to the death. The Court examined the …
The petitioners, five residents of Baswaria village, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to convert their pending application into a criminal appeal under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State of Bihar and another respondent opposed …
The petitioners filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested withdrawal, and the court granted the permission. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. The …
The petitioners, four individuals named Ballabh Yadav, Bijo Yadav, Lalan Yadav and Tuntun Yadav, filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from a 2015 police case. During the hearing on 16-03-2026, the petitioners' counsel sought the court's …
The petitioner, Sikandar Dubey, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage of the trial. The Court considered the request and granted …
The petitioners, Renu Devi and Om Prakash Mahtha, challenged the trial court's order taking cognizance of the case against them. Over time, the investigation progressed and charges were formally framed. The petitioners then moved this Court seeking to withdraw their application, requesting liberty …
The petitioners filed an application in the High Court and, at the outset, sought permission to withdraw it, requesting liberty to raise all points at a later stage. The Court granted the petitioners' request, allowing the withdrawal of the application. Consequently, the application was disposed of …
The petitioners, four individuals from Darbhanga district, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Jarina Khatoon. They later sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application while reserving the right to raise all points at a …
The petitioners, Surendra Chaudhary, Akhilesh Chaudhary and Anita Devi, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous petition. The State of Bihar and Uma Devi were opposite parties. The petitioners’ counsel requested liberty to …
The petitioners, Kumari Sharendri and Bira Devi, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding seeking permission to withdraw that application while retaining the right to raise all points available at the time of framing of charge. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the …
The petitioner, Shanti Devi, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application while retaining the right to raise all points at the time of charge framing. The State of Bihar, represented by Nisha Kumari, opposed the petition. Counsel for the …
The petitioners, a group of individuals including Avadhesh Yadav and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court in a case arising from a police report in Begusarai. The application sought certain relief, but the petitioner's counsel later requested permission to …
Munmun Choubey filed an application seeking liberty to withdraw the present application and to raise all points at the time of framing of charge. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s permission for such withdrawal. The court considered the request and, without expressing any view on the …
The petitioner, Bashisth Singh Kushwaha, filed an application in the High Court of Patna seeking permission to withdraw that application while reserving the right to raise all points at a later stage. The State of Bihar opposed the request. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, …
The petitioners, Wasik and Md. Chalu, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw that application and to raise all points at the time of framing of charge. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court’s liberty to withdraw, while the State opposed. …
The petitioner, Shambhu Kumar Mishra, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court and sought permission to withdraw it while reserving the right to raise all points later. The Court heard counsel for both parties and allowed the prayer. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, Kundan Kumar and Hiran Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application challenging the trial court’s order taking cognizance of the case against them. By the time the application was heard, the charges had already been framed, changing the procedural stage of the proceedings. The …
Manoj Mahto filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a complaint in Nalanda. The petitioner sought to withdraw the application, and his counsel, Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, requested permission for the same. The court considered whether the …
The petitioner, Tabassum Ara, was implicated in a kidnapping case (Araria P.S. Case No. 428 of 2025) based solely on the confessional statement of co-accused Munni Khatoon, although her name does not appear in the FIR. The charges include offences under sections 137(2), 142 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. …
Guddu Kumar and Munna Kumar were arrested in a case (Chiraiya PS Case No. 450 of 2025) for alleged possession of illegal firearms under Section 111 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioners claim they were merely gratuitous passengers …
The petitioner, Rakesh Jha, applied for regular bail in a murder case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that he was falsely implicated in the killing of a woman over a dowry dispute. The prosecution alleged that the deceased’s marriage was performed six years earlier …
The petitioner, Robin Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a country‑made pistol and three live cartridges were recovered from his possession. He applied for bail, contending that the prosecution had not complied with the …
Akash Kumar was arrested during a police raid on 22 November 2025, during which two mobile phones and Rs.2,000 were seized from him. He was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, asserting that …
The petitioner, Rishav Jha, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and sections 25(1‑B)(a), 37 and 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that he held an informant while a co‑accused fired at the informant, causing injury. The …
The petitioners, Subhash Kumar and Bijo Ray, were arrested in connection with a disturbance at a cultural program where co‑accused fired indiscriminately, injuring two persons, and allegedly assaulted Munni Devi with the butt of a pistol. The petitioners contend they were falsely implicated, …
Amarjeet Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent incident at a cultural programme where he, along with co‑accused, allegedly opened fire, injuring two persons and damaging a vehicle. The prosecution charged him under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms …
The petitioner, Vikesh Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case alleging his assistance in facilitating a co-accused's illegal entry into India using a fake passport, under sections 318(4), 61 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution argued he was an abettor, while the petitioner claimed innocence, …
Chhotu Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (Raniganj P.S. Case No. 101 of 2025) alleging that he killed the daughter of informant Ramchandra Yadav and disposed of the body in a bush outside his village. The prosecution’s case is based on the informant’s allegation and a …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a theft case (PS Case No. 268 of 2025) involving the alleged stealing of a gas cylinder, cash, and personal documents. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s door lock was broken and the items were missing. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Rinku Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 64, 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., alleging that the informant Savita Kumari falsely accused him of establishing a physical relationship under the pretext of marriage. The petitioner claimed …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 305(a) and 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita concerning a burglary and theft. The prosecution alleged that unknown thieves broke into an informant's house and stole items, and the petitioner was implicated solely …
The petitioner, Suman Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 111 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita concerning alleged involvement in the sale of stolen motorcycles. The prosecution’s case is based on information that criminals assembled to sell motorcycles, …
The petitioners, Jivan Kumar and Nitish Kumar, were charged under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act for possession of 17.86 g and 8.43 g of smack respectively. They applied for regular bail, contending that they were falsely implicated, that the search and seizure procedures were not complied …
The petitioner, Rahul Sah, was charged under sections 126(2), 140(3), 115, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly kidnapping an informant, beating him and threatening him. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, alleging that the FIR was not properly filed and that a co‑accused …
Vishnudeo Lijpuriya applied for regular bail in a case (PS Laukaha Case No. 84 of 2023) involving serious offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 120B, 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Prabhas Kumar, Priyesh Kumar and Durgesh …
The petitioner, Arbind Kumar, was arrested in a police raid on a vehicle where 22 grams of brown sugar was seized from co-accused Ajit Kumar. No narcotics were found on the petitioner, only a mobile phone, and he claimed to be a gratuitous passenger. He applied for bail under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) …
Shiv Kumar Ray was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault on an informant, his son, and the informant's wife, as well as the theft of Rs.20,000. The prosecution alleged that Ray and co‑accused used weapons and force during the incident. Ray's counsel argued that the assault …
Shambhu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 187 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant and a shooting that resulted in a chest wound. The petitioner contended that the allegation of him firing the pistol was a super‑addition, noting that no empty cartridges were recovered and …
Birendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking permission to withdraw it while retaining the right to raise all points later at the charge‑framing stage. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s approval for this withdrawal. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, …
The petitioners, Saheb Gaddi and Gayanti Devi, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.3103 of 2026 before the Patna High Court. They sought the court's permission to withdraw the application while reserving the right to raise all points at a later stage. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioner, Kirpa Shankar Thakur, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court arising from a 2017 complaint case. He later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner appeared before Justice Praveen Kumar to …
The petitioners, including Sunny Gupta and relatives, filed an application before the Patna High Court. They later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application. The court considered whether a party may be allowed to withdraw a pending application. It held that the court has discretion …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Hasanchak village, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and a police officer. They sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application while preserving the right to raise all points raised therein at the time of charge …
The petitioner, Sunil Rai, was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and offences under the Arms Act for the killing of Sunil Kumar Singh on 27 September 2020. The prosecution alleged that Rai, along with co‑accused, conspired due to enmity and shot the deceased, relying on witness testimony and …
The petitioner, Krishnanandan Chaubey, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The petitioner’s counsel requested liberty to raise all points at a later stage. The court considered whether it could grant such …
Petitioners Pukar Kapri and Kripal Kapri filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. Their counsel, Ms. Chetna, sought permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all the points raised therein at a later appropriate stage. The State, …
Rajesh Kumar filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.6900 of 2024 arising out of PS Case No.609 of 2022. He sought permission to withdraw the application so that he could raise all points at the time of framing of charge. The learned counsel for the petitioner made the request before the …
Krishna Yadav and Dulari Devi filed a petition before the Patna High Court seeking to withdraw the criminal proceedings initiated against them under PS Case No. 358 of 2022. They also requested liberty to raise all points they intended to make at the time of charge framing. The State of Bihar …
Murari Prasad Singh, the petitioner, had been acquitted of the charges against him by the trial court after a full trial. Subsequently, he filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw this application, arguing that …
Dr. Kunal Kishore Singh filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.7499 of 2024 before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The State, represented by an assistant public prosecutor, opposed the withdrawal. …
Md Masoom Ali, the petitioner, was the subject of cognizance taken by the Special Court, Araria under Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He filed an application seeking to convert the proceeding into a criminal appeal and requested a …
The petitioners filed an application before the High Court seeking permission to withdraw it, stating that the trial court had already disposed of the substantive case. The respondents (State) were represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor. The court considered whether the application could be …
Sonu Upadhyay filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking discharge under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code, challenging the order dated 24‑11‑2023 that rejected his discharge plea in POCSO case No. 14 of 2023. While the application was pending, charges were framed against him and …
The petitioner, Sunit Kumar, filed an application before the Patna High Court after being acquitted in a criminal case (PS Case No. 609 of 2023). No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State and the second opposite party were present. The counsel for the second …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 10‑03‑2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, exercising its discretion, granted the request, noting that withdrawal would …
Mukesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Dharmendra Paswan, sought permission to withdraw the pending application. The court granted the request, stating that no opinion on the merits had been expressed. Consequently, …
The petitioners, four Yadav relatives, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17 July 2023 that set aside the cognizance taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a land‑dispute criminal case (Case No. 171 of 2022). They argued that the …
The petitioners, Sanjeev Kumar and Rajeev Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending application. The respondents, the State of Bihar and others, were represented by counsel. The sole issue before the court was whether the …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from PS case No.165 of 2019 in East Champaran. The petitioner later sought the court’s permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner moved that the withdrawal be allowed. The court …
Petitioner Md. Jameer filed a criminal miscellaneous application and sought the Court’s permission to convert it into a criminal revision under Section 102 of the J.J. Act. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Chetanand Paswan, requested this conversion and a four‑week period to file the revision. The …
The petitioner, Ranjan Sah, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court arising from a police case. The petitioner later sought the court’s permission to withdraw that application. The State of Bihar, represented by an A.P.P., opposed the withdrawal. The court examined its …
Ramavtar Sah filed a criminal miscellaneous application arising from PS case No.162 of 2023 in Bairiya Police Station, West Champaran. The petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The State of Bihar opposed the withdrawal. The court, exercising its discretion, granted …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The State of Bihar, represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the withdrawal. The court, exercising its …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar Ray, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief. The court identified procedural defects in the petitioner's filing. Justice Praveen Kumar granted the petitioner three weeks to rectify these defects. The order warned that failure to cure the defects …
The petitioner, Ramagya Shukla, filed a criminal miscellaneous application (No. 9970 of 2024) arising out of a police case No. 1061 of 2020 in Patna. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal. The court …
The petitioner, Arun Prakash, a Director of DRDA West Champaran, filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from a 2016 case. The opposite parties were the State of Bihar and Dhukhi Ansari. Counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the application …
A group of petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The State, represented by A.P.P. Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, …
Shakuntala Devi filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending application. The petitioner was represented by Ms. Rasika and Ms. Priti. The State of Bihar, represented by Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP, opposed the withdrawal. The sole issue before the court was …
The petitioner, MD Irfan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The State of Bihar opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered whether it could grant permission for the withdrawal of a …
The petitioner, Kamal Kishore Sah, filed an application in the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, the sole petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the death rendered the application infructuous and sought permission to withdraw it. The Court accepted the request …
The appellants, three members of the Giri family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting a villager and his grandson, using caste‑based slurs and damaging property. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the …
The appellant Jogindra Rai appealed against the acquittal of Manoj Mahto (respondent No.2) for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and related offences (Secs. 201, 34 IPC) arising from the death of his daughter whose body was found in a well. The trial court had held that the prosecution failed to prove guilt …
The appellants were accused of assaulting the complainant's son and others during a Holi celebration, allegedly using rods and lathis, and of molesting a woman and stealing her jewellery while abusing caste names. The prosecution sought to deny anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled …
The appellants, members of the Modi family, were charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting Ranjit Rajak and his family with caste‑based slurs and theft on 12 May 2024. The trial court rejected their …
The appellants were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the informant Sursati Devi and her family during a wedding procession, including vulgar singing, physical assault, …
The appellants, Jai Sharma and Subodh Sharma, were accused of extorting a hen, assaulting a woman, snatching her gold chain, and attempting to rape her while also using caste-based abusive language. The FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, and the Special Judge had denied their …
The appellant, Baso Mandal, was charged with multiple offences including murder attempt, assault, robbery and violations of the Arms Act, as well as offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Special Judge had rejected his application for …
Murari Singh appealed against the Special Judge’s order rejecting his anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The prosecution alleged that Singh, along with co‑accused, assaulted and attempted to outrage the modesty of …
Ganesh Kumar (alias Ganesh Saw) appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (PoA), Nawada, which had denied him anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 323, 363, 365, 366 and 376 and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …
The appellant, Mitthu Yadav, was charged under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting an informant and his brothers with caste‑based slurs and physical violence. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
Vivek Prajapati was charged with assault, firing a pistol, and caste‑based slurs under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, along with IPC sections 341, 323, 307/34 and the Arms Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which the Additional Sessions Judge …
The appellants, Ramashray Yadav and his son Mukesh Kumar, were charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468/34, Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly taking money from a Scheduled Caste informant, promising a …
The appellants, Ranjeet Kumar Singh and Pawan Kumar Ravidas, were accused of extorting Rs.1,00,000 and assaulting the informant's son with caste-based abuse and an iron rod, leading to injuries. They sought anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …
The appellant, Shiv Ratan Chauhan, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions for allegedly assaulting an informant's son with an iron rod, firing a weapon, and using caste-based slurs on 13 October 2024. He applied for …
The appellants, Ravi Kumar and Amod Kumar Ray, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly assaulting informant Subhash Kumar and his brother with weapons, causing injuries and theft of a gold chain. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that …
The Patna High Court considered an appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act filed by Sudheer Mandal, who had been denied anticipatory bail by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in a case involving alleged assault, robbery and …
The appellants, four brothers, were accused of assaulting the complainant's younger brother and using caste-based slurs during a Holi celebration, leading to serious injuries. The trial court rejected their application for anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …
The appellants were convicted by a Special POCSO Court for kidnapping, rape and trafficking of a minor girl under Sections 376, 120B IPC, Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and provisions of the POCSO Act. They appealed, arguing that the alleged offence occurred on 30 September 2012, …
The informant (X) alleged that on 10 June 2018 a group of accused, including Sanjay Ram, Vijay Ram and Surendra Ram, assaulted her family members, leading to the death of her husband. The trial court acquitted the three accused on charges under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 376/511 and 34 of the …
The appellants, four accused persons, filed Criminal Appeal No.638 of 2025 arising from a 2024 case in Sasaram, Rohtas. They sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel, Mr. Kumar Vikram, made the application before Justice Praveen Kumar. The Court examined the request and, finding …
The appellants Ramesh Rai, Aniket, Ajeet and Ashok Rai were charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for assaulting and robbing Lakhan Deo Das, allegedly using caste slurs. The trial court rejected their application for …
The appellants appealed against the order of the District and Additional Sessions Judge who had denied their prayer for anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, along with others, …
The appellants, three members of the Sahani family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly assaulting informant Dashrath Sah with caste‑based slurs on 29 September 2024. The Special Judge had rejected their …
The appellants were accused of assaulting an informant and his relatives over a dispute concerning a she‑goat, with allegations that they used caste‑based slurs. The prosecution charged them under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …
The appellants, Bimla Devi and Manju Kumari, were charged under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (sections 74, 77, 352, 351(2)) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly intimidating a girl, taking obscene photographs, and threatening her family. They …
The appellant, Dhananjay Singh, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly demanding an inflated loan amount, abusing the complainant by caste name, and selling the complainant's tractor. The Special Judge denied his anticipatory bail. On appeal under Section 14A(2) of …
The appellants, Prabhat Kumar and Pritesh Kumar, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and related provisions for allegedly abusing and assaulting the son of informant Rajo Paswan, with a co‑accused firing a pistol. The trial judge rejected …
The appellants appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a Special Judge's order rejecting their anticipatory bail. The prosecution alleged that a water‑dispute on 4 January 2025 led to the appellants assaulting the informant, his relatives and wife, using …
The appellants, Prabhat Kumar and Pritesh Kumar, appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case involving alleged caste-based abuse and a shooting incident. The prosecution alleged that the informant's …
The appellants, alleged musclemen, were accused of assaulting, humiliating, and stealing from a Scheduled Caste complainant over a land dispute, with allegations of caste-based abuse under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court rejected their application for anticipatory bail, …
The appellants Nitish Kumar and Rajesh Kumar were convicted for the murder of Mahesh Mistri and related offences under Sections 302/34, 448/34, 504/34, 506/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution relied primarily on the informant's (father of the deceased) testimony, …
The appellants Nitish Kumar, Rajesh Kumar and Dinesh Prasad were convicted for the murder of Mahesh Mistri and related offences under Sections 302/34, 448/34, 504/34, 506/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, receiving life imprisonment for murder and concurrent terms for the other charges. They …
Usha Kumari appealed the acquittal of three accused under the proviso to Section 413 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that they had assaulted her and her brother with a firearm on 20 June 2017. The trial court had acquitted the accused on the ground that the prosecution failed …
The appellants, Bhushan Yadav and Sunil Yadav, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a complainant, his wife and daughter, using caste‑based slurs, breaking a mobile …
The appellants, including Gopal Upadhyay, Prabhu Nath Singh and Tutu Singh, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly hurling caste slurs and assaulting an informant on 10 October …
The appellants, members of the Paswan family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged trespass, assault and caste‑based abuse against a landowner on 7 November 2023. Their application for anticipatory bail …
Manoj Chaudhary was accused of murder and related offences under the IPC, Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Court. The appellant …
Mithilesh Kumar Yadav and his wife Sima Devi were accused of blocking a public path, assaulting Sushma Devi and her family, and using caste‑based slurs on 11‑Nov‑2024. The FIR, filed 12 days later, invoked several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …
The appellant, Dharmendra Das, was charged under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly abusing and threatening the complainant, Sunaina Devi, on caste grounds. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected his application for …
The appellants, Mantu Ray and co‑accused, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting informant Mithilesh Kumar Sah and using caste‑based slurs during a dispute over two mahua trees. The prosecution alleged that the appellants …
Anand Kumar Yadav was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting an informant’s family, using caste slurs, and causing injuries. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing a clean antecedent, a 23‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of medical …
The appellant, Ramdutt Singh, was charged with assault, theft, and alleged caste-based abuse under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. He sought anticipatory bail, which the Special Judge had denied. The appellant argued that the …
Thirteen accused persons were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged assaults on members of the Dangi community in Tekari, Gaya. The Special Judge rejected their application for anticipatory bail, prompting an appeal under Section …
The appellant, Rishu Kumar Varnwal, was charged under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged rape, forced termination of pregnancy, and caste‑based verbal abuse. The trial court denied his prayer for anticipatory bail, holding that the allegations, …
The appellant, Ravi Patel, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC sections for alleged caste‑based assault on a group of villagers on 22 March 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act, but …
The appellants, three brothers, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly forming an unlawful assembly, assaulting the wife and daughter‑in‑law of an informant, using caste‑based slurs, and forcibly taking money and jewellery. They applied …
The appellants, Jai Nandan Pal and Vinay Pal, were accused of illegally drawing electricity for irrigation and allegedly hurling caste‑based slurs at the informant when villagers objected, leading to the electrocution of the informant's minor daughter. The FIR, lodged three days after the incident, …
The appellant, Danish Ali, was charged under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting an informant, Shaktiman Pasi, with a stick and hurling caste‑based slurs after a dispute over a stolen mobile phone. The lower court rejected his …
The appellants, Amod Rai and Prem Rai, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting informant Babloo Paswan and his family with weapons, using caste-based slurs, and stealing gold ornaments. They sought anticipatory bail, …
The appellants, members of a family from Champapur, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting and verbally abusing the informant, Parma Paswan, on caste grounds. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
The appellant, Abhishek Kumar, was charged under several IPC provisions and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with the complainant, Monika Kumari, on the false pretext of marriage, extracting money, and abusing her caste …
The appellants, Suraj Kumar and Mahesh Mahto, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Arms Act and several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly opening fire at a fair on 16 January 2025 and assaulting the informant Badal Kumar. They …
The appellants, Deepak and Murari Goswami, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly abusing, assaulting, and stealing jewellery from the informant Renu Devi on 18 March 2024. The FIR was lodged sixteen days …
The appellants, a group of Yadav family members, were charged with assault, use of caste slurs, and threats of violence in a land dispute, leading to injuries to the informant and his relatives. The trial court denied their application for anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled …
The appellants, a group of Yadavs, were charged under several IPC offences and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, his daughter‑in‑law and using caste‑based slurs on 6 May 2024. The trial judge rejected their application for anticipatory bail. The appellants …
The appellants were accused of causing the death of an informant's father by allegedly setting up an electrified wire around a field, leading to electrocution, and of verbally abusing the informant using caste-based slurs. The Special Judge had rejected their application for anticipatory bail under …
The appellants, including Gopal Upadhyay, Prabhu Nath Singh and Tutu Singh, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly hurling caste slurs and assaulting an informant on 10 October …
The appellants, including Gopal Upadhyay, Prabhu Nath Singh and Tutu Singh, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly hurling caste slurs and assaulting an informant on 10 October …
The appellant, Rajmangal, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant Manoj Paswan after using caste-based slurs. The informant claimed the assault involved a rod, causing a head injury and …
The appellants, members of the Chaudhary family, appealed against the order of the Special Judge that denied them anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste-based assault, lathi beating, and theft under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution …
Amrish Kumar and Arun Kumar were accused of assault, robbery and caste‑based abuse under several IPC provisions and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an incident on 03‑05‑2024 at the informant's residence. The Special Judge rejected their application for anticipatory bail, prompting an …
The appellant, Lalbabu Yadav, was accused of assaulting an informant and his relatives over a land dispute, with allegations of caste-based abuse under the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant and co‑accused attacked the informant with iron rods and a sickle, causing serious …
The petitioner, Dukhi Sah, filed a writ petition seeking the release of a shop (Krishna Dhaba) that had been seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of illicit liquor. The shop was rented to Brahmdev Sah, who is an accused in the criminal case, …
The appellants, members of the Mahto family, were charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, attempted murder, and outraging the modesty of an informant who had purchased land from a third party. They applied …
The appellants, Raushan Kumar and his wife Priyanka Kumari, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman and her daughter with a lathi and stealing Rs 20,000. The trial court …
The appellants, Hare Ram Chaudhary and Ravindra Sah, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 341 and 323 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste-based abusive language on 28 June 2024. They applied for …
The appellants, a group of Yadavs, were charged under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 506 and under Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing a person with caste-based slurs. They applied for anticipatory bail; three appellants withdrew their …
The appellants, members of the Choudhary family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for a violent incident that resulted in death. They sought anticipatory bail, which was initially rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. The …
Prince Kumar Gautam was accused by Rinki Devi of assault, caste-based abuse, intimidation and theft on 16 November 2023, leading to charges under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section …
The appellants, Mukesh Kumar and co‑accused, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.5165 of 2024 before the Patna High Court challenging a conviction by the Samastipur court. The appellants' counsel submitted that the final form had been filed and there was no risk of arrest, seeking the Court's permission …
The appellants, Bhola Sahni, Sanja Devi, Videshi Sahni and Sima Devi, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged garbage‑throwing, liquor‑selling, assault and caste‑based abuse …
Manu Kumar was convicted by a Special POCSO Court for rape under Section 376D IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act based solely on the victim’s testimony. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the victim’s age, noting that she declared herself 18 years old and a medical opinion placed her …
The appellant, Kavindra Yadav, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant was arrested. The appellant’s counsel argued that the arrest rendered the appeal infructuous. The court considered whether an appeal can be dismissed solely on the …
Sudhir Kumar Yadav was charged under IPC sections 379, 511, 323 and 504 and under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged theft and caste‑based verbal abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional District Judge‑I cum …
The New India Assurance Company appealed against a district court order that dismissed its application to set aside an arbitral award on the ground of limitation. The dispute centered on when the three‑month limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 began to …
Chhotu Kumar was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman, Shobha Kumari, with an iron rod and using caste-based slurs. The trial court rejected his application for anticipatory bail. Kumar …
The appellants, a group of twelve persons from Hardaspur village, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and assaulting children playing music on a government platform, using caste slurs, and …
Madan Rai and Indu Devi were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant’s minor son, abusing her with caste slurs, and stealing jewellery. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
The appellant Rajeev Kumar was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening a farmer over a land dispute, including using caste-based insults. The trial court denied his prayer for anticipatory bail. The …
The appellants, the Managing Director and District Manager of the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, appealed against Guptaji Brothers Rice Mill Pvt. and the State of Bihar. After an arbitral award was made, the respondent (the corporation) entered into a settlement, deposited …
The appellants, Aslam Khan, Kaushar Khatoon and Alam Mian, were charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, caste‑based abuse and damage to crops in a land‑dispute with the informant Lalan Choudhary. The Special …
Guddu Kumar appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that Kumar and others assaulted a fast‑food shop owner, used caste‑based abuse, and outraged the modesty of female family …
Petitioner Minu Kumari, a sweeper employed at HPCL Muzaffarpur, alleged that she was terminated orally on 1 October 2025 without a written order or show‑cause notice. She filed a writ petition seeking reinstatement, a declaration that the termination was illegal, payment of salary arrears, EPF …
Tata AIG General Insurance Company (appellant) insured M/s Tirhut Food Products (respondent) for fire loss. After a fire in December 2018 the insurer paid Rs 1.61 crore as full and final settlement, which the respondent later contested and invoked the arbitration clause in the policy. The arbitral …
Petitioner Rajnish Kumar filed a writ application seeking a direction that Punjab National Bank consider his representation dated 28‑02‑2024, which he claimed was left pending despite a liberty granted in an earlier writ (C.W.J.C. No.16080/2021). The Court examined whether it could compel the bank …
The petitioner, Shaheeen Siddiqui, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary for three separate periods during which she was on leave or deputation, alleging that the respondents arbitrarily marked her absent and withheld her wages. She claimed leave for the death of her mother, casual leave …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking promotion to higher posts in the Agriculture Department of Bihar, invoking the 2023 rules issued by the General Administration Department. He also requested that the department consider his representation dated 17‑12‑2025 and grant an …
The petitioner, Gulbas Ansari, retired on 30 June 2025 after attaining the age of 60 and filed a writ petition seeking various pensionary benefits, including salary for June 2025, arrears of dearness allowance, provisional gratuity, unused earned income, correction of a provident fund deduction, …
Amar Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the office order dated 21/08/2025 that appointed Sanjit Kumar as Vikas Mitra, seeking to quash the order, the merit list, and to obtain his own appointment. He also requested that the authorities consider his case for service benefits. The court observed …
The petitioners, a group of Staff Nurses Grade‑A employed at Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its health officials to promote them to the post of Ward Sister/Nursing Sister, citing similar promotions …
Petitioner Narad Thakur, a school employee, filed a writ petition challenging his dismissal order dated 18 December 2025, alleging violation of Rule‑18 of the Bihar Panchayat Elementary School Service Rules, 2020 and seeking back salary. He sought quashing of the dismissal order and payment of …
Arjun Engicon Pvt. Ltd. filed a commercial appeal against East Central Railway but delayed filing the appeal by 6 months and 10 days beyond the deadline prescribed under Section 13(1‑A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The appellant sought condonation of this delay, citing confusion over the …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari and mandamus to set aside a 10‑June‑2022 office order (Memo No‑406) issued by the Child Development Project Officer that terminated her employment as Aanganbari Sahayika. She also asked that the order be treated as continuous …
Petitioner Subodh Kumar filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several officials. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ application. The State authorities raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court …
Abhiraj Kumar, a former officer of Indian Bank, challenged a disciplinary order that removed him from service. He filed an appeal under Regulation 17(1) of the Indian Bank Officer Employees (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 on 28‑11‑2024, but the appeal remained pending beyond the 90‑day …
Petitioner Kamlesh Tiwari filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. Subsequently, his counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ application. The State of Bihar, as respondent, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court examined whether it could grant permission for …
Munilal Rajak filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and the Bihar Staff Selection Commission to clarify his candidature status for a Class‑IV appointment, to render a reasoned decision within a fixed period, and to grant him the appointment if eligible. The petition …
The petitioner, Indrajit Saxena, a civil servant, filed a writ petition seeking promotion to the post of Chief Engineer, relying on a 2021 order that quashed a penalty imposed on him. He argued that despite the quashing, he was transferred back to a lower post and his subsequent representation for …
The petitioner, a Hawaldar in the Bihar Special Armed Police, filed a writ seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and police authorities to consider his claim for a third MACP and promotion to Sub‑Inspector after completing the requisite service periods, and to pay the salary differences …
