Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

4021 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600

CHANDRAMANI DEORAJ DUBEYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Chandramani Deoraj Dubey, a director of M/s. Pooja Land & Premises Pvt. Ltd., who was apprehending arrest in a case involving alleged forgery of an irrevocable power of attorney and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya …

ASAD SALIM SHAIKHversusCHANDRAMANI DEORAJ DUBEY

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Chandramani Deoraj Dubey, a director of M/s. Pooja Land & Premises Pvt. Ltd., who feared arrest in a fraud case involving forged power of attorney documents. The FIR alleged that the company’s directors forged government stamps and …

RUSHIKESH BALASAHEB JODHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by a 19‑year‑old college student accused of causing a fatal road accident while allegedly intoxicated. The applicant was charged under Sections 105, 125(b), 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

MANOJ THANSIGH JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Manoj Thansigh Jadhav, a co-accused in CR No.63 of 2025, applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He was alleged to have received approximately Rs.32 lakh as proceeds of crime in a fraud involving the company ‘Open Hands’, violating Sections 318(4), 316(2) …

MANPREET KAURversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Manpreet Kaur, a partner in a courier company, was implicated in a complaint alleging non‑payment of Rs 23,08,476 to a complainant, leading to charges under Sections 318(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. She filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the …

DNYANDEO TERAJO WAGH AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Dnyandeo Terajo Wagh and Jagannath Revannath Jaybhaye, who were charged under Sections 3(5), 316 and 318 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged cheating related …

DEVESH RAVINDRA SAWANTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Devesh Ravindra Sawant, accused of multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act for alleged sexual activity with a 14‑year‑old girl. The victim claimed …

ARSHAD JAINUDDIN KAZI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants were arrested on 1 September 2025 for offences under Section 325 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. After a charge‑sheet was filed and bail granted, the prosecution invoked Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(4) of …

TABISH ASGAR ALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Tabish Asgar Ali, was arrested as accused No.2 in a case involving the creation of IP addresses and the generation of fraudulent birth certificates using a residential proxy purchased by accused No.1. The offences alleged include sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340 of the Bharatiya …

GOPAL ASHOK PATEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Gopal Ashok Patekar was arrested on 14 October 2025 in connection with CR No. 465 of 2025 for alleged offences under Section 310(4)(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The applicant contended that his arrest was solely a product of the …

ABDUL SHAKIB ABDUL QADIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning an alleged offence under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, a 20‑year‑old, was arrested solely on circumstantial evidence, …

NITIN BAJIRAO SANASversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Nitin Bajirao Sanas, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for charges under Section 103(1) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to the assault and death of a close friend. The facts indicate that the accused …

AAYAN HARUN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Aayan Harun Shaikh, accused No.2 in CR No.36 of 2026, which involves offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act, 2012. The victim’s statements, …

DADA @ PRAJOT ABASO CHOUGULEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Dada @ Prajot Abaso Chougule under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 188/2026 alleging offences under Sections 25 and 4 of the Arms Act, 1959 and several provisions of …

SERAJ AHMED MOHAMMAD HAROON MEMONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Seraj Ahmed Mohammad Haroon Memon, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with ATS Crime No.8 of 2024 involving multiple serious offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Prevention of Money‑Laundering …

ANIL DATTATRAYA JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The appellant, Anil Dattatraya Jadhav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered as Crime No. 499 of 2025 for offences under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(w)(i)(ii) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. …

JYOTI W/O DEVSHI BAGDAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Jyoti w/o Devshi Bagda, was charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly cheating investors of Rs.64.9 lakh between August 2022 and June 2023. The prosecution alleged that she and her husband induced investors to invest by false …

TABREZ IDRIS MEMONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Tabrez Idris Memon, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assaulting a tempo cleaner and a passenger, and for pushing the latter off a bridge, resulting in the victim's death. The trial court had denied bail, prompting the present application. The …

GEETA JANARDAN VISHWAKARMAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Tabrez Idris Memon, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assaulting a tempo cleaner and a passenger, and for pushing the latter off a bridge, resulting in the victim's death. The trial court had denied bail, prompting the present application. The …

JYOTI W/O DEVSHI BAGDAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Jyoti w/o Devshi Bagda, was charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly cheating investors of Rs.64.9 lakh between August 2022 and June 2023. The prosecution alleged that she and her husband induced investors to invest by false …

DATTATRAY BABAN KHANDAVE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Dattatray Baban Khandve and others, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 81 of 2025 alleging assault, criminal intimidation and other offences arising from a family dispute over ancestral property. The …

AKHTAR SUNHARI KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Akhtar Sunhari Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with CR No. 22 of 2026, alleging his involvement in an assault that arose from a dispute over expenses of a Goa trip. The FIR records state that the informant was attacked by several accused, with the applicant …

SAGAR TUKARAM HADKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Sagar Tukaram Hadke, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 alleging sexual intercourse under a promise to marry and dowry demands. The …

PARVEZ RAFIQUE CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Parvez Rafique Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging his presence during a quarrel that resulted in injury to a complainant and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the …

PUJA VIJAY CHAVANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Puja Vijay Chavan, accused of murder under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution relied on call data records (CDRs) and internet usage showing frequent communication between the applicant and …

ANIKET DILIP JAISWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered bail for Aniket Dilip Jaiswal, accused under Sections 69 and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged sexual assault and deception. The victim, an adult of the same age, claimed the relationship was consensual and began via Instagram in 2021, with no …

RAVIKANT BHANUDAS GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravikant Bhanudas Gaikwad, accused No.2 in a murder case involving three victims, where the prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of accused No.1. No other material evidence or motive for the applicant was …

LAXMAN SAKHARAM GHAGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (CR No. 909 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, Laxman Sakharam …

DIPAK SANDIP BHISEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Dipak Sandip Bhise, was arrested for allegedly murdering his wife, with the case based on circumstantial evidence of a wooden stick assault. He sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the murder charge under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya …

DIPRATNA BHAIDAS NIKAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Dipratna Bhaidas Nikam, a branch manager of a co-operative bank, was charged under Sections 111, 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assisting co‑accused in opening twelve bank accounts using forged Aadhaar and PAN documents. The …

KETAN SUDHAKAR SHEVATKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Ketan Sudhakar Shevatkar, an employee of Quantum Soft Technology Pvt. Ltd., applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the …

NEHA VIPIN TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Neha Vipin Tiwari, a director of Yash Express and Logistics Pvt Ltd, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging fraudulent GST invoicing under Sections 318(4), 316(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. She contended that the alleged wrongdoing was carried out by her husband, the …

VINOD SOMNATH RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Vinod Somnath Rathod, accused of cheating Rs.4.80 lakh in a land‑sale fraud and charged under Sections 318(4), 351(2), 352 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution …

SHAIKH SADIK SHAIK SATTAR @ SADIK MAMA PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Shaikh Sadik Shaikh Sattar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault and threats. The FIR alleged that the applicant, along with other …

KIRAN SATYAPPA GOPHANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Kiran Satyappa Gophane, was implicated in a disturbance at a police station where he and associates allegedly threatened police officers and were involved in a heated argument, leading to an FIR charging him with multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He filed an …

HASMAT RAZA NAZIR MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Hasmat Raza Nazir Mohammad applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case arising from a police operation to remove an illegal temple and masjid where a mob of 200‑300 persons pelted stones at police and damaged a government …

DEEPAK MOTILAL KOLIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Deepak Motilal Koli, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged cheating, forgery, and fraud involving over Rs. 2 crore. The …

SANDIP RAMESH GANGURDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Sandip Ramesh Gangurde, who is one of fifteen accused in a case involving serious offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, the Arms Act …

RAKESH TUKARAM KOSHTIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rakesh Tukaram Koshti under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act. The prosecution …

SADHU HULRAM MANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sadhu Hulram Mane, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case involving alleged illegal LPG cylinder refilling that attracted charges under Sections 287 read with 288 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 3 and 7 …

SANDEEP SHIVAJI UGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sandeep Shivaji Ugale, was arrested for alleged assault causing grievous injuries to a victim during a dispute over agricultural work that affected his family's livelihood. The FIR, filed on 28 January 2026, listed offences under Sections 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), …

SUGRIV ALIAS SURAJ CHOUDHARY NISHADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sugriv alias Suraj Choudhary Nishad, was arrested for alleged assault causing the death of a close relative, under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The incident arose from a dispute over a scooter key, leading to a fistfight in which the applicant is said …

MANOJ PINCHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Manoj Pincha applied for transit anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant informed the court that a similar application was already pending before the Dindoshi Sessions Court. He sought …

BHAUSAHEB BHIKANRAO CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The applicant, Bhausaheb Bhikanrao Chavan, Deputy Director of Education, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after being named an accused in FIR No. 164 of 2025 for allegedly forging Shalarth ID entries to illegally appoint 79 …

SURYAKANT GULABRAO YEWALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, a Tahsildar, was accused of misusing his quasi‑judicial powers under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 to pass an order and issue a letter favoring the purchase of government land by Amadea Enterprises LLP. The land, originally owned by the Government of Maharashtra …

KUNDAN JANKU GAIKWAD AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, a Tahsildar, was accused of misusing his quasi‑judicial powers under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 to pass an order and issue a letter favoring the purchase of government land by Amadea Enterprises LLP. The land, originally owned by the Government of Maharashtra …

NITESH SHANTILAL MEHTA AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under FIR No. 35 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 316(2), 318(4) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to a commercial dispute over gold weighing and cash transactions. The applicants claimed they had resolved …

SOURAV RAVI CHANDAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Saurav Ravi Chanda and Krushna Virendra Singh, who were charged under Sections 103(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly inserting a plastic pipe into a deceased's anus during a Holi water‑play, causing fatal …

KRUSHNA VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Saurav Ravi Chanda and Krushna Virendra Singh, who were charged under Sections 103(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly inserting a plastic pipe into a deceased's anus during a Holi water‑play, causing fatal …

RAMESH BALU DIKOLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Ramesh Balu Dikole, was arrested for alleged abetment in the theft of gold jewellery worth over Rs 5.5 crore from a train traveling from Solapur to Mumbai. The prosecution alleged that he conducted a recce and identified co‑accused, relying mainly on statements of co‑accused and the …

AMITA DHARMENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Amita Dharmendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 921 of 2026) arising from allegations by a construction company that she facilitated sale transactions through a broker. The complainant and the applicant entered into a settlement and …

SUMIT KISHOR KRIPLANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by the owner of Manas Lifestyle Resort, Sumit Kishor Kriplani, who was charged under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the death of a …

MANDAR SURESH MALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mandar Suresh Mali, accused No.4 in a case alleging illegal prenatal sex determination and medical termination of pregnancy under the PC‑PNDT Act, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. The …

RAVINDRA SUBHAS DESHMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by the owner of Manas Lifestyle Resort, Sumit Kishor Kriplani, who was charged under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the death of a …

VIKASH NARESH CHILLAR AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

A scuffle among five young student petitioners resulted in injuries and the registration of FIR No. 0150/2026 at Viman Nagar Police Station, charging them under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant (Respondent No.2) and the petitioners reached an amicable settlement …

PRATIK BRIJESH PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Pratik Brijesh Pandey, Pradeep Gupta and Jia Rachel Jacob, who were arrested in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 and the NDPS Act, 1985. The applicants sought release pending …

PRADEEP GUPTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Pratik Brijesh Pandey, Jia Rachel Jacob and Pradeep Gupta, who were arrested in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 and the NDPS Act, 1985. The applicants sought release on bail …

JIA RACHEL JACOBversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Pratik Brijesh Pandey, Pradeep Gupta and Jia Rachel Jacob, who were arrested in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 and the NDPS Act, 1985. The applicants sought release pending …

PRATIK PRABHAKAR DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Pratik Prabhakar Deshmukh, was charged in a road‑rage incident that resulted in a fatal assault, being named as Accused No.3 in the FIR and No.2 in the charge‑sheet. Four of the seven co‑accused had already been released on bail, and the applicant argued that his role was similar and …

AKASH ALIAS DADYA ANANTA WAGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Akash @ Dadya Ananta Wagh, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for offences arising from a street fight between two known groups, for which he had been in custody for nearly two years. The FIR listed multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya …

SHIVAJI RAGHUNATH UGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Shivaji Raghunath Ugale, was arrested for assaulting a victim during a quarrel over agricultural work that allegedly threatened his family's livelihood. The incident resulted in two blows causing injuries that a private hospital classified as grievous, while a government hospital did …

SURAJ THANSIGH JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Information Technology Act and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The applicant, Suraj …

NABEEL AZAZ QURESHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Nabeel Azaz Qureshi, was arrested for assaulting his parents with a knife, alleged to be with intent to murder, under Sections 109(1) and 118(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He suffers from schizophrenia, a condition he has had for six to seven years, and his father also has …

AJGAR FAKIR SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Ajgar Fakir Shaikh, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences under Sections 143(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic Act, 1956. He was arrested after being seen at …

SONI SANTOSH JAYBHYEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Soni Santosh Jaybhye, who is accused of murdering her 11‑year‑old son and attempting to murder her 13‑year‑old daughter under Sections 103(1) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

UMAR DIN MOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a fatal road‑traffic accident that resulted in the death of a police constable. The applicant, Umar Din Mohammad, a 19‑year‑old cleaner who was seated beside the …

KRUSHNA ASHOK NADAR ALIAS SONUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Krushna Ashok Nadar, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences alleged under Sections 109, 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 37(1) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. He was arrested on 6 …

PRANJAL DILIP TAWAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered an application for bail filed by Pranjal Dilip Taware under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences alleged under Sections 103(1), 324(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, a young female gym …

SHRUT NAVNATH KULTHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Shrut Navnath Kulthe, a 22‑year‑old B.Com student accused in CR No. 229 of 2025 for multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The alleged incident involved …

RAKESH S/O RAJENDRA PRASAD KHETANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED

The applicant, Rakesh Khetan, filed four separate anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking transit bail for alleged cyber‑fraud offences registered in Assam, Maharashtra, Delhi and Gujarat. He claimed that his SIM card was misused by …

RAKESH S/O RAJENDRA PRASAD KHETANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED

The applicant, Rakesh Khetan, filed four separate anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking transit bail for alleged cyber‑fraud offences registered in Assam, Maharashtra, Delhi and Gujarat. He claimed that his SIM card was misused by …

RAKESH S/O RAJENDRA PRASAD KHETANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED

Rakesh Khetan filed four separate anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking transit bail for alleged cyber‑fraud offences registered in Assam, Maharashtra, Delhi and Gujarat. The FIRs allege that amounts were transferred to his account …

RAKESH S/O RAJENDRA PRASAD KHETANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED

Rakesh Khetan filed four separate anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking transit bail for alleged cyber‑fraud offences registered in Assam, Maharashtra, Delhi and Gujarat. The FIRs allege that amounts were transferred to his account …

VINOD GITARAM DAUNDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Vinod Gitaram Daund, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 and several …

SAGAR SHIVAJI DHAPATE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Sagar Shivaji Dhapate and Avinash Mahindra Chavan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 188 of 2026 alleging offences under the Arms Act, 1959 and several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

VIRAJ CHAUDHARY AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the FIR dated 05‑07‑2026 in Crime No. 200, filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 74, 91 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and also sought a mandamus directing the …

SANDEEP KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep Kushwaha, who is charged under Sections 65(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly sexually assaulting a child aged …

KRUNAL GANESHBHAI DEKATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Krunal Ganeshbhai Dekate, who was arrested on 6 August 2025 in connection with offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

SHARAD DAYARAM SHINDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Rejected

The Bombay High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sharad Dayaram Shinde, former chairman of Kai. Dayaram Piraji Shinde Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Shinde, while acting as chairman …

VISHAL SANJAY ZENDGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Vishal Sanjay Zendge, was arrested in connection with a case of alleged cruelty and abetment to suicide involving his wife’s death. He sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, while the prosecution charged him under several sections of the …

SARWAR NIJAMUDDIN KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sarwar Nijamuddin Khan, sought bail in a case registered under Section 64(2)(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging he had sexually assaulted a female victim after a night of drinking. The prosecution alleged that the applicant cancelled the victim’s auto‑rickshaw, retained …

BIPIN JOGINDAR MAURYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Bipin Jogindar Maurya, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for an offence alleged under Sections 80, 85, 351(2), 352 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) relating to dowry harassment and the suicide of his sister‑in‑law. The …

PRANALI PRALHAD NAIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Pranali Pralhad Naik, who was charged with murder of her mother under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

RAHUL SUDHIR PASVALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Rahul Sudhir Pasval, faced an FIR (Crime No. 275 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, stemming from a quarrel over a share‑market loss. While the FIR mentions a blade‑type assault, the allegation of assault is …

SHIVMANGAL KALYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning an alleged murder charge under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, a young offender, was implicated solely on …

SUNITA PRAKASH DHODIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Sunita Prakash Dhodi, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 910 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 189(2), 190, 191(2), 329(4) and 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a dispute over a room in a chawl. The FIR alleged that the applicant and four …

HANUMNAT LIMBAJI DUKAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

Hanumant Limbaji Dukare applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a case alleging indecent acts on a 13‑year‑old girl in a public place, allegedly committed together with his wife. The prosecution’s case rests on three eye‑witnesses and …

CHAITALI NAKUL BHOIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Chaitali Nakul Bhoir, who is accused of murder under Section 103 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant had called the police herself …

AMIN SHAUKAT SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by 18‑year‑old Amin Shaukat Shaikh in connection with a murder case (CR No.113 of 2026) involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, …

GORAKSH @ GORAKH SAMBHAJI SONAWANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case where the accused, Goraksh Sonawane, is alleged to have harassed his wife, who subsequently committed suicide. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on three post‑incident …

ROHIT @ BHURYA SIDDHARTH KAMBLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Rohit alias Bhurya Siddharth Kamble, was arrested in connection with a fight on 24 November 2025 in which he slapped a minor friend of his and became involved in a brawl that resulted in injuries and damage to a scooter. The case was registered under several offences under the …

ADINATH @ ADITYA ISHWAR GIRAMEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by a young offender, Adinath alias Aditya Ishwar Girame, who was charged under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act for …

SHAKEEL SYEDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, owner of premises where a fraudulent call centre operated, feared arrest in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) despite not being named in the FIR. The FIR alleged that employees impersonated insurance officers to obtain money from victims. The applicant’s wife, similarly …

KIRAN SADASHIV CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Kiran Sadashiv Chaudhary, who was charged under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for cheating an informant by promising a bank job for a payment of Rs.15,00,000 and receiving Rs.6,50,000, of which Rs.1,75,000 was alleged …

RAJEEV RAI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajeev Rai and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 05‑07‑2025 and mandamus to restrain arrest and coercive action under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State counsel informed the Court that the …

RAHIL ALIAS ARSHAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rahil alias Arshan and five others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 02‑09‑2025 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled through a mediation agreement dated 07‑04‑2026, which involved payment of Rs.15 …

ARUNA ASHOK NIRBHAVANE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The application for anticipatory bail was filed by two women, the mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of a deceased man who had allegedly committed suicide, alleging they were falsely implicated under Sections 108, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was based on a complaint by …

KISHOR BABAN KARANDE @ KARANJEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences alleged in FIR No. 259/2026, including assault and rioting under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was based on a complaint of a quarrel on 9 March 2026, with a …

ANIKET ARUN PARIHARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging sexual intercourse with a woman under a false promise of marriage, invoking Sections 115(2), 352 and 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant …

PRAVIN MAHADEO SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by 19‑year‑old Pravin Mahadeo Shinde, who was arrested on 4 January 2026 in connection with a dacoity case (CR No.4 of 2026) and charged under Sections 310(2), 312 and 61(2) of the …

MUKESH AMRUTLAL MANEKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Amrutlal Manek applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 68 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 318(1), 316(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR, filed by a complainant, names four …

SUNITA NAVNATH KURHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Applicants, three women accused in a cross‑FIR land‑dispute case, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences listed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Court noted that the other accused had been arrested or released on bail, …

KAILAS NIVRUTTI YEOLE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND ANR

Allowed

The appellants were accused of assaulting a woman on 16 June 2026, slapping her and tearing her blouse, thereby outraging her modesty. An FIR was lodged two days later, initially charging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …

NITIN S/O MADANLAL JAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered the bail application of Nitin Jain, accused (Accused No.4) in FIR No. 276 of 2026 for allegedly receiving and selling fake gold bangles, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Jain received 14 gold bangles, …

MOHAMMAD REHAN NISAR ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Mohammad Rehan Nisar Ansari, who was arrested for alleged involvement in a fatal altercation on 02.02.2025. The incident involved a scuffle between the accused and the …

SACHIN VILAS KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sachin Vilas Kamble, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences of criminal breach of trust and cheating under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of …

TEJAS ANIL GANGURDE @ HYDER ALI KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered bail applications filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a case (CR No. 479 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, sections of the Indian Arms Act and the Maharashtra …

SWAPNIL SHIVAJI CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Swapnil Shivaji Chaudhari under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a murder case (CR No. 328 of 2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case was …

JANKU BAPURAO YELE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Janku Bapurao Yele and Vivak Janku Yele, were arrested in connection with a FIR (CR No. 485 of 2026) arising from a family land dispute that resulted in injuries to the complainant, a relative. The FIR listed multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including …

SANKET DHANAJI LANKESHWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Sanket Dhanaji Lankeshwar, who is hearing impaired and has been in prison for two years as Accused No.4 in CR No. 444 of 2025. The case involves alleged assault and homicide at a …

PARMESHWAR ALIAS PAMYA @ PRAMOD BALU GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Parmeshwar Gaikwad, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case involving the death of a victim who consumed a poisonous concoction. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had practiced black magic under the Maharashtra …

VIPUL VIKAS KULKARNIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vipul Vikas Kulkarni under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a criminal case (CR No.172 of 2025) alleging cheating, forgery and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. …

MAHESH RAJENDRA AMBILWADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Mahesh Rajendra Ambilwade, who was alleged to have assaulted and outraged the modesty of a woman who later committed suicide. The prosecution alleged that the …

AMARENDRA @ AVANEND SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 06.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners prayed that the police follow the …

PAPPU MET @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, disposed of four writ petitions concerning systemic delays in criminal trials and non‑compliance with bail‑surety directions. In Pappu Met’s case, the court modified the bail order, reducing the personal bond to Rs …

ABHISHEK DAYASAGAR KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to quash FIR No.245/2025 registered for alleged sexual assault and caste-based atrocity under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC&ST Act, 1989. The victim initially filed the FIR alleging non-consensual intercourse and caste discrimination, but later executed an …

AMOL KISAN DHATRAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Amol Kisan Dhatrak, was arrested as a customer during a police raid on Yuan Thai Spa & Salon, which was alleged to be operating as a brothel. An FIR was filed under Sections 143(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic …

WASIM SALIM SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Wasim Salim Shaikh, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a human‑trafficking case involving a 17‑year‑old victim from Bangladesh. The prosecution alleged that the applicant provided residence and facilitated the victim’s …

AMAN KHAN ALIAS ADIL SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aman Khan alias Adil Shah, was charged under Sections 316(2), 351(2) and 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged non‑consensual sexual intercourse and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had repeatedly forced the victim into sexual acts, recorded …

KRUSHNA MARUTIRAO DHANGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Krushna Marutirao Dhange, who was charged under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a co‑worker through threats …

SOUDAMINI BEHERAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Soudamini Behera, who was alleged to have dealt in contraband Gutka, violating sections of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, as well as IPC section 328. The applicant argued …

SACHIN YUVRAJ AHIREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin Yuvraj Ahire, who was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Police Act for allegedly abetting a violent assault on an informant. The prosecution relied on statements of co‑accused …

MAYUR DINKAR NIKAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mayur Dinkar Nikam, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged assault and threat against an informant on 15 March 2026. The prosecution alleged that Nikam, along with co‑accused, held the informant’s neck and threatened him with a scythe, asserting that the informant was …

ABHISHEKH SALIL AHIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Abhishekh Salil Ahir, was charged under Sections 108, 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 for allegedly subjecting his wife to cruelty and demanding unpaid dowry, which the prosecution claims led to her suicide. …

AKSHAY MADAN VARATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Accused No.2, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with CR No.568 of 2025, which alleged his participation in the suicide of the prosecutrix and the forwarding of a photograph of her with another accused. The charges …

KIRAN JAIPRAKASH KUWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The High Court examined an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by an Education Officer accused of authorising fraudulent appointments of over a thousand teaching and non‑teaching staff, with fabricated approval orders and Shalarth IDs. The …

ANIS SULTAN TANDELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Anis Sultan Tandel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that a false FIR was lodged against him for alleged extortion and threats related to a land dispute involving a 231‑acre property. The prosecution …

MAYUR DATTATRAY BHOKAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Mayur Dattatray Bhokare, who was accused of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. He had been in custody for more than ten months for an …

SUNILKUMAR RAM AVADHSINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 1218 of 2025 alleging financial fraud, forgery, and breach of trust involving a vehicle loan. The prosecution argued the offences were serious and required custodial interrogation to uncover a larger conspiracy. The applicant …

CHINTAN VINESH TOPRANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Chintan Vinesh Toprani, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 74, 75, 78 and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for outraging a woman's modesty and making obscene comments at CSMT Railway Station. The prosecution presented CCTV footage and the victim’s identification …

NITESH @ PAPYA SHRIKANT PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Nilesh Patil, accused of offences under Sections 69 and 70 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The complainants were two …

ABDUL FAIZAN ABDUL RAFIQversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Rahemat Khan Ahmad Khan and Abdul Faizan Abdul Rafiq, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with CR No. 389 of 2026 alleging offences under the Food Security and Standards Act, 2006 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including alleged dealing in contraband Gutkha. The …

SWAPNIL DNYANESHWAR SURYAVANSHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Swapnil Dnyaneshwar Suryavanshi, who was charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act, MCOC Act, and Criminal Law Amendment …

RAHEMAT KHAN AHMAD KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Rahemat Khan Ahmad Khan and Abdul Faizan Abdul Rafiq, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with CR No. 389 of 2026 alleging offences under the Food Security and Standards Act, 2006 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including alleged dealing in contraband Gutkha. The …

SHREEKANT ARJUN GHULEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Shreekant Arjun Ghule, who was arrested for offences including dacoity, murder, and violations of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that co-accused had already been …

RAHUL @ SAGAR BABAN AVHADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, a hotelier, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a charge-sheet alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Essential Commodities Act and Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The prosecution’s case rested on the seizure of …

SABARINATH VINU K. V.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sabarinath Vinu K. U., a 24‑year‑old, was arrested along with twelve co‑accused for alleged possession of weapons and chili powder, charged under Sections 310(4) & 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 & 5 of the Arms Act. He filed a bail application under Section …

ROHIT KASHINATH BHOIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Rohit Kashinath Bhoir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case registered under sections 310(2), 333, 351(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR, filed after a family quarrel and alleged theft of golden ornaments, does not name the …

UDAY JAYANT JAGTAPversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Uday Jayant Jagtap, accused No.5 in a violent assault case (C.R. No.45 of 2026). The prosecution alleged that Jagtap, along with two others, brutally attacked the victim …

SATYANARAYAN RAMKARAN MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Satyanarayan Ramkaran Malli, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No.192 of 2026) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, and the …

SANGITA ARJUN GAVLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The applicant, mother of a premature baby who is the prosecutrix, was arrested as Accused No.12 under Section 21 of the POCSO Act, a bailable offence. She filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in connection with a case involving …

GOVIND SUBHASH NISALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Govind Subhash Nisal, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act, 1959, and the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, for unlawful …

VIPUL BABANRAO INGAWALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The High Court of Bombay considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vipul Babanrao Ingawale under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences under Sections 109, 3(5), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that the …

BABAR SALAHUDDIN KHAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, Babar Salahuddin Khan and Rustam Salahuddin Khan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging they dealt with contraband Gutkha, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Food Safety Act, 2006. The prosecution argued the offence was serious, especially under …

HARVINDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Harvindra Singh filed a second bail application in a case involving forgery and cheating under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS). The applicant relied on Section 480(6) of the BNSS, arguing that because the trial had not concluded within 60 days of the first date fixed for …

DATTATRAY BALA WALUNJversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Dattatray Bala Walunj, was implicated in a property dispute after an informant alleged that he extorted Rs.3,00,000 in cash and threatened her family, leading to an FIR under sections 308(2), 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended …

VENKATESWARARAO TIRUMALASHETTYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Venkateswararao Tirumalashetty, who was in custody for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, a 57‑year‑old diabetic, suffered gangrene requiring …

DEVIDAS GOVIND NIKALJI AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellate court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Devidas Govind Nikalje, who was charged in CR No.403 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The incident involved an assault on the complainant by six unknown persons; …

MAHESH MADHUKAR PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahesh Madhukar Pawar in connection with FIR No.697 of 2025, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 including murder and related provisions. The incident involved the applicant sitting in the rear seat of a car driven by …

PIRAJI @ CHANDRAKANT MARUTI SHINDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Court considered an application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) for bail of accused No. 8 in FIR No. 11 of 2025, who was charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 including forgery and false …

MOHANKUMAR RAJKUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Mohankumar Rajkumar Verma, was arrested for alleged homicide under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, following a drunken altercation in which the deceased was throttled. The prosecution contended that the applicant pressed the victim’s neck, causing death, while the …

Prabhavati Vitthal WadkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Prabhavati Vitthal Wadkar, challenged the anticipatory bail orders dated 6 May 2026 granted by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act and an Additional Sessions Judge in four separate bail applications. The State of Maharashtra filed a ‘B’ Summary in Crime No.193 of 2026 for offences …

Prabhavati Vitthal WadkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Prabhavati Vitthal Wadkar, challenged the anticipatory bail orders dated 6 May 2026 granted by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act and an Additional Sessions Judge in four separate bail applications. The State of Maharashtra filed a ‘B’ Summary in Crime No.193 of 2026 for offences …

Prabhavati Vitthal WadkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Prabhavati Vitthal Wadkar, challenged the anticipatory bail orders dated 6 May 2026 granted by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act and an Additional Sessions Judge in four separate bail applications. The State of Maharashtra filed a ‘B’ Summary in Crime No.193 of 2026 for offences …

Prabhavati Vitthal WadkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Prabhavati Vitthal Wadkar, challenged the anticipatory bail orders dated 6 May 2026 granted by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act and an Additional Sessions Judge in four separate bail applications. The State of Maharashtra filed a ‘B’ Summary in Crime No.193 of 2026 for offences …

SHUBHAM SHASHIKANT SALIversusTHE SATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Shubham Shashikant Sali, who is charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for alleged …

SARFARAZUDDIN MOHAMMAD YUNUS SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Sarfarazuddin Mohammad Yunus Shaikh in connection with a case involving alleged theft of scrap material and sewing machines from a truck. The prosecution alleged that …

GOPAL MANGILAL PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Gopal Mangilal Pawar, accused No.7 in a case of counterfeit currency under Sections 179, 180 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The allegation against him stemmed …

SAGAR RAJENDRA BIRE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicants, Sagar Rajendra Bire and Sudhir Jaggu Kacharavat, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a case alleging sale of poisonous liquor under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 and Sections 123 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

RAUNAK RAHUL KHANDELWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raunak Rahul Khandelwal, who was charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and the NDPS Act for allegedly supplying ecstasy pills at a music concert that resulted in two deaths and injuries. The …

SATISH BAJIRAO PEKHALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Satish Bajirao Pekhale, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (CR No.239 of 2025) and charged under Sections 1103, 109, 3(5) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

ABHISHEKH @ ABHI RAMESH TAMBEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Abhishekh @ Abhi Ramesh Tambe, who had been in custody for three years for offences including murder attempt, assault, and possession of arms. The prosecution argued that the …

KAPIL NAVNATH BHIORversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Kapil Navnath Bhoir applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 118(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly assaulting his friend with a metal bracelet after a dispute over …

SABIR HUSAIN BADASHAH APASIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Sabir Husain Badashah Apasi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for a charge under Section 305 of the same code relating to a theft of Rs. 48,000. The FIR named an unknown person; the …

DIPAK @ RAHUL RAMESH AHIREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Dipak @ Rahul Ramesh Ahire under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant alleged that the case arose from a cross‑FIR in which …

PARVEZ RAFIQUE CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED

Parvez Rafique Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State opposed, contending that the applicant’s affidavit falsely stated his criminal antecedents as ‘unknown’ despite five cases, three …

YOGESH KANUBHAI DARJIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Yogesh Kanubhai Darji, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after an FIR was lodged by his wife alleging dowry demand and cruelty dating back to 2010. The FIR was filed six years after the alleged incidents, while a divorce …

PRADEEP RAMKHILAWAN JAISWAL @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Pradeep Ramkhilawan Jaiswal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging illegal transport of contraband Gutkha and pan masala. The FIR alleged his presence in a vehicle seized with the prohibited items, charging him under several provisions of the Food Safety and …

SAGAR MADHUKAR LANDGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sagar Madhukar Landge, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, 1959 for alleged offences arising from a deteriorating live‑in relationship with the prosecutrix. The FIR was lodged on 23 …

ANURAG RAMCHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered the bail application of Anurak Ramchandra Yadav, who was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act for allegedly assaulting a deceased with a knife and sword and participating in a violent mob. The …

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pawan Kumar, had earlier been granted anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS pending the police report. After the charge‑sheet was filed, the State argued that the bail application was no longer maintainable, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision (Ram Pukar Yadav v. State of …

TALIBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail and requested permission to approach the concerned court for regular bail, seeking protection of his interests for a short period. The learned Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the prayer. The court directed that the applicant may appear …

SHIVANKIT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the FIR dated 07-08-2026 filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, seeking its quash. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed prima facie cognizable offences, making the petition untenable. …

DALVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Dalveer Singh was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abduction and assault. His first bail application was rejected, but three co‑accused were later released on bail by the same bench. The applicant argued that, given the parity with co‑accused and the …

RAJESH PANDURANG SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rajesh Pandurang Salve, a member of a Scheduled Caste, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 14-A of the SC/ST Act after being implicated in a property dispute case (Crime No.561 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST …

IMTIYAZ AHMED RIYAZ AHMED AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for two accused who were charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused had been simultaneously employed in two …

LAKHANSINGH RAJPUTSINGH DUDHANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court of Bombay considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Lakhansingh Rajputsingh Dudhani, who was in custody for a year for alleged theft, robbery, and house breaking under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

NAEEM AKHATAR SAGEER AHMADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Naeem Akhatar Sageer Ahmad, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution produced a muster roll showing the applicant's signature, …

GOPAL PUNDALIK KANGANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court of Bombay considered a bail application filed by Gopal Pundalik Kangane, accused No.9 in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including grievous hurt and forgery. The applicant was alleged to have used forged ration cards in bail bonds, but the …

YASH DATTATRAY DIVATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by 20‑year‑old Yash Dattatray Divate, who was charged under Sections 64(2)(D), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8, 12 and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 for alleged sexual offences against a 17‑year‑old girl. …

SHEKHAR @ CHANDRASHEKHAR JAGANNATH BHOSALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Shekhar Bhosale and by Bhausaheb and Laxmi Kamble in connection with offences under Sections 108, 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants claimed they were not present at the alleged assault on …

BHAUSAHEB DATTOBA KAMBLE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Shekhar Bhosale and by Bhausaheb and Laxmi Kamble in connection with offences under Sections 108, 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants claimed they were not present at the alleged assault on …

SATTAR NANNU SHAIKH AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Sattar Nannu Shaikh and Shahrukh Sattar Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with a robbery case (C.R. No.170 of 2026). The FIR alleged that unknown persons broke into a house …

SHOBHA GOPAL LOANRI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Shobha Gopal Lonari and Shantabai Gorakh Kanade, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a violent incident arising from a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the applicants participated in a …

SANTOSH BHIKU PISAL AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 CrPC filed by three newspaper vendors accused of murder and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case relied solely on circumstantial evidence and alleged motives of a money dispute and an …

PARSHURAM CHINDU GOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for regular bail of the accused Parshuram Chindu Gore, who is charged under Sections 326(F), 326(G), 61 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for a factory fire. The applicant is the …

SWATI VISHNU DAHIWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Swati Vishnu Dahiwal, a woman with two minor children, who was arrested in connection with a jewellery‑cum‑investment scheme run by her husband. The scheme, named ‘Suvarna Sanchay Yojana’, allegedly attracted deposits from 36 persons and is …

PRAN DNYANESHWAR YEWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Pran Dnyaneshwar Yewale, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for offences under Sections 108, 115(2), 351(3) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to the suicide of a 22‑year‑old victim. The prosecution’s case …

SADIK ALI YUSUF SAYYEDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Sadik Ali Yusuf Sayyed, who was arrested 14 months after a robbery allegedly committed on 03.01.2025. The prosecution relied solely on the accused's antecedent record …

SANDIP CHHAGAN HOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sandip Chhagan Hole, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (CR No. 0266 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including attempt to murder. The …

PRATAP @PRATAPSING DAINGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Pratap @ Pratapsinh Bharatrao Daingade, who had been incarcerated for over nine months for a motor‑vehicle accident that resulted in the death of a valet. He was …

AMITA PRASAD KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Amita Prasad Kadam, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case alleging fabrication of a Commencement Certificate used for registration under the Registration Act, 1908. The prosecution alleged that the …

RAJAT GOYAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.05.2025 that gave rise to a criminal case under sections 352, 351(1) and 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties later informed the court that they had entered into a compromise and a matrimonial alliance. The …

GUDDI DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, including Guddi Devi, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 24‑05‑2025 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. They contended that they are adults who voluntarily married each other and that Guddi Devi's age was incorrectly …

SUBHASH BABAN KHAPARE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants were charged with organising a horse and bullock‑cart race in Nandurdi village despite a prohibition, an event that resulted in the death of an 88‑year‑old man. They contended that they only organised a religious Yatra and not the race. An interim anticipatory bail had been granted by …

DHAVAL VIMALKANT KAKKADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Dhaval Kakkad filed a writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 689 of 2025 and the accompanying charge‑sheet after the parties reconciled and the complainant, an advocate, received Rs 32,00,000 by demand draft. The petitioner and complainant executed a consent affidavit indicating that the petition …

SUNNY SHIRISH MISALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sunny Shirish Misal, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 47 of 2026 for an alleged offence under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to a dowry dispute with the complainant, a 29‑year‑old woman he was engaged to marry. The complainant alleged that the …