Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

4528 judgments · newest first · showing 4201–4400

Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that 69.120 liters of foreign liquor were recovered from his vehicle, violating Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely the owner of the vehicle, had no knowledge …

Mukesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Manjhi was arrested in connection with a case (PS Parsa Case No. 330 of 2025) alleging that 60 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty, constituting an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no …

AshishversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashish, was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 662 of 2025) alleging possession of 86.4 liters of foreign liquor on a motorcycle, violating Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he neither owned the motorcycle nor had …

Dilip Chouhan @ Dilip PrasadversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dilip Chouhan, was arrested on 2 December 2025 after 80 litres of liquor were recovered from a jute sack near a pond, and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of any incriminating material in his …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raja Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13.86 litres of liquor recovered from a plastic sac. The petitioner contended that the sac did not belong to him, no incriminating material was found in his …

Ravi Mahto @ Ravi MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Mahto was arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 240 litres of liquor were recovered from a farm near a river. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was found in his possession, and that the liquor was recovered …

Amresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Amresh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 120 litres of codeine‑containing cough syrup, alleged to be recovered from a vehicle not owned or driven by him. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that no contraband was found in …

Sunil SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sunil Sahni and Manoj Rai, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 1950 liters of country-made liquor on two scooties. They contended that they were neither owners nor riders of the scooties and …

Lal Babu Sah @ Lal Babu SahuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lal Babu Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jokihat P.S. Case No. 294 of 2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 150.48 litres of liquor in his vehicle. The prosecution claimed the liquor was …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 7,555.68 liters of foreign liquor from a tempo and warehouse, alleged under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 32(3), 36, 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely the …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raja Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 447.03 litres of liquor from a vehicle, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely the driver, had no knowledge of the goods, and that no incriminating material was found in his …

Gopi Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gopi Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 149 of 2025) alleging possession of 171 litres of liquor, charged under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was …

Ranjit Rai @ Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,000 litres of country-made liquor from the bank of a river. He contended that he had no possession of the liquor, that the recovery took place …

Umesh Jaisawal @ Umesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Jaisawal, was arrested in connection with a case (Bhore PS Case No. 438 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 486 litres of country‑made liquor was recovered from a corn field. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating …

Raj Kumar BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raj Kumar Bind was arrested after 43 litres of liquor was recovered from a public place and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, asserting that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor was found in his possession, that he has no prior …

Jai Ram ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jai Ram Choudhary, was arrested after police recovered 19.75 litres of country-made liquor from a plastic jar he was carrying, and he was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was recovered from …

Raees Khan @ Rahish KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a driver, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 3,105 litres of liquor from a truck and charged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no knowledge of the …

Pramila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Pramila Devi feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. No. 20847/2022) which she later withdrew. She subsequently filed a second anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. …

Ashok SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 279 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He asserted a clean criminal record, denied ownership of the seized vehicle, and claimed he was …

Sabita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, accused in a case involving the illegal manufacture and sale of country-made liquor and related mob violence, applied for regular bail. The police raid uncovered large quantities of illicit liquor at the residence and shop of Lalbabu Mahato, leading to the arrest of several …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a gunny bag on four motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the vehicles, and …

Rajeev Ranjan @ Raju Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 700 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house belonging to Asha Devi, not the petitioner. He argued that the recovery was based …

Amod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amod Chaudhary was arrested on 13 September 2025 in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of two litres of illicit liquor seized from his house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Golu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor. He asserted a clean criminal record, argued that the alleged liquor was recovered from a location not under his …

Md. SajeedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Sajeed, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 32(3), 41(a) and 41(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 280 litres of spirit and 4.68 litres of liquor from a closed …

Akhilesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 360.92 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and …

Subodh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Subodh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 103.200 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles not owned by him. He argued that the seizure was not from his conscious …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the recovery of 2,142 litres of liquor from five vehicles, offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise …

Gulshan Singh @ Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulshan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 703.125 litres of liquor from a public toilet. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, …

Amrit Chauhan @ Pahari @ Sudhanshu RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amrit Chauhan sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged recovery of 1,260 litres of liquor and offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that no liquor was found in his …

Om Paswan @ Om Prakash PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Om Paswan and Barelal Paswan, sought relief from anticipated arrest in connection with a FIR dated 24‑12‑2024 alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 130 …

Chhotu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar Singh, a co‑driver of a red truck, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 2000 litres of spirit were seized from the vehicle. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, the seized vehicles did not belong …

Raushan Yadav @ Raushan RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(2)(3) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 510.375 litres of liquor and seizure of three motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, …

Bali NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bali Nut, accused of offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, had earlier been granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to verification of his criminal antecedents. The verification revealed eight prior cases, leading to cancellation of …

Anuj Singh @ Anuj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anuj Singh, was implicated in a case under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30(a), 38 and 42 for allegedly possessing 450 litres of spirit in a tractor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession, and was not …

Bali NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bali Nut was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had earlier obtained provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on verification of his criminal antecedents, claiming only two cases, but the verification revealed eight antecedents, leading to cancellation of that …

Praduman Mahto @ Praduman Bind @ Praduman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Praduman Mahto sought anticipatory bail after his name was implicated in a case involving the recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s …

Pintu Poddar @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Poddar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged possession of 25 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the case against him relied solely on a …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 980 litres of spirit from a tempo registered in his name, alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 41(1) and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no incriminating material …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ashish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s case was based …

Upendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Upendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 200 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle registered in his name. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was seized …

Gawaru Chaudhary @ Munna ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gawaru Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case (PS No. 307 of 2024) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 70.4 litres of country-made liquor recovered from two motorcycles. The prosecution’s case is based on statements of co‑accused, while …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sachin Kumar and Raju Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (G.R. No.3001 of 2023) involving a motorcycle allegedly stolen under Section 379 IPC. They argued that they were not named in the FIR and were only linked to the crime because the vehicle was later …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 2,275.200 litres of liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and sections 319(2) and 111(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered from …

Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Prince Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case where 504 litres of liquor were seized from a Scorpio car. He contended he was neither the owner nor driver and that his name was implicated only through a co-accused's confessional statement, which he argued lacked …

Bechan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bechan Sah, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case (Chakai PS Case No. 336 of 2023) involving alleged possession of 775.8 litres of illicit foreign liquor recovered from a pick‑up van. The prosecution charged him under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 272 …

Vikash Kumar @ Sawan Kumar @ Vikash SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 53.625 liters of liquor from a tempo. He claimed innocence, arguing that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that the only link to him …

Dharmendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Singh, feared arrest in an excise case involving 80 litres of liquor allegedly recovered from his vehicle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no knowledge of the goods, no criminal antecedent, and …

Urmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Urmila Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where 483.84 litres of liquor were recovered from a Scorpio car registered in her name. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was contraband under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The …

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six residents of Sabalpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.1024 of 2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 1,900 litres of illicit liquor from a river bank. The prosecution’s case was based on the …

Saddam @ Sadam AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Saddam Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 378 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, …

Nandan Kumar Singh @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nandan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in an excise case (PS No. 363 of 2025) alleging offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 396 litres of liquor were seized from a vehicle. He contended that his name was only disclosed by a co‑accused, …

Pappu Paswan @ PappuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 1,877.04 litres of illicit foreign liquor from three vehicles. The prosecution alleged violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner contended …

Sanjay PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Pandey, feared arrest in a case (PS No. 1354 of 2025) alleging violations of Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 872.640 litres of liquor were seized from a truck he owned. He contended that he was unaware of the consignment, had no criminal …

Rambabu Paswan @ RambabuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rambabu Paswan sought anticipatory bail after learning of his possible arrest in a case involving the seizure of 448.45 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. The prosecution alleged violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and several sections of the Indian Penal Code. …

Bhuar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhuar Ram, feared arrest in a case (PS No. 387 of 2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 440 litres of liquor were recovered from his residence. He contended that his name was only mentioned by a co‑accused, that he had no involvement …

Sudhir Rai @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sudhir Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sonepur PS Case No. 1004 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 225 litres of illicit liquor were seized behind a co‑accused's shop. The prosecution’s case relied on identification by …

Pawan Rai @ Pawan Kr. Yadav @ Pawan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pawan Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS No. 318 of 2024) involving alleged illegal possession of 1,365 litres of liquor, alleged under Sections 30(a), 33, 34 and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that his name was mentioned only through statements of …

Moti Yadav @ Moti Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Moti Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.236/2025) alleging offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, based on the recovery of 675 litres of country‑made liquor from a mango orchard. …

Ashish Kumar Mandal @ Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 153 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 177 litres of illicit liquor from a tractor. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner …

Sujeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 625.08 litres of liquor from a co‑accused’s house. He argued that his name was mentioned only through the co‑accused’s …

Nandlal RajbharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nandlal Rajbhar, feared arrest in a case (Sripur PS Case No. 24 of 2024) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 107.8 litres of liquor were seized. He contended that his name was only mentioned by a co‑accused and that there was no prima facie evidence …

Irfan Alam @ Irfan AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Irfan Alam and Sanoj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 1146 of 2025, which alleged that 2,500 litres of country-made liquor were recovered from 13 motorcycles. The prosecution alleged the petitioners' involvement under Sections 30(a) and …

Munna Kumar @ Munna Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Munna Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case (PS Case No. 273 of 2025) under Sections 30(a) and 62 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 388.8 litres of liquor had been seized. He contended that no incriminating material was found in his …

Dinesh Kumar Rai @ Dinesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Rai, was implicated in a case (PS No. 1354 of 2025) for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 864 litres of liquor from a truck and tempo. He contended that he had sold the tempo and had no …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that he kidnapped the victim, while the petitioner claimed innocence, stating the victim had eloped with …

Nikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nikku Kumar, feared arrest in a case (PS No. 283 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 45 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle. He contended that his name was only mentioned by a co‑accused and that he …

Om Prakash MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Mukhiya, feared arrest in a case involving the seizure of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not …

Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithu @ Mithilesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 202 of 2025) alleging possession of 90 litres of Nepali liquor recovered from a motorcycle, contravening Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that his name was implicated solely …

Ashok Paswan @ Ashok Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashok Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(d), 30(f), 33 and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of spirits and liquor from a motorcycle and a shop. He argued that the seized items were not in his …

Girija DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Girija Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 20.1 litres of liquor were recovered from her house in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that the house is joint family property, she had no conscious …

Pawan Yadav @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 57.03 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from public premises and not from his possession. He argued that the investigation was mechanically …

Ram Kumar @ RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Kumar was arrested in Phulwarisharif for alleged possession of 1.35 g of brown sugar, charged under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The total narcotic seized from all five accused was 6.47 g, which is well below the commercial quantity of 250 g and only slightly above the small‑quantity …

Md. Naeem @ Naeem MansuriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Naeem Mansuri, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and S... Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he …

Sunny Rai @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Rai, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 2,944.9 litres of liquor from a warehouse he does not own. He argued that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement made by a …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rinku Devi applied for anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case alleging possession of six litres of liquor under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was arrested on 10 October 2025 after police recovered 100 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a scooty and seized the vehicle. He claims he is not the owner of the scooty and was falsely implicated due to personal enmity. The petitioner applied for regular bail …

Bhola Uraon @ Bhola UranversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhola Uraon, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the premises involved were joint family property. He argued that the 2018 …

Nagendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Mahto, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres and 123.5 litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong …

Ajay KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 187.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle near Keshav Market. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Shiv Kumar Yadav @ Shivrath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 225 litres of liquor recovered from a bush near a canal. The petitioner …

BHAGWATI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

Bhagwati Devi, the wife of Pankaj Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 3.75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She was not present at the spot of seizure and did not have the liquor in her conscious …

Umawati Devi @ Umrawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Umawati Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in her possession and was seized from premises adjacent to her house. She has a prior case under the Excise Act and contended that …

Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his shop and that he was not in possession of the contraband. He argued that the …

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three individuals with prior excise cases, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 111 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 336.960 litres of liquor. They argued they …

Chunchun PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Punam Devi and Chunchun Prasad, were arrested in a POCSO case alleging child sexual abuse and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, POCSO Act and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, had …

Punam DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Punam Devi and Chunchun Prasad, were arrested in a POCSO case alleging child sexual abuse and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, POCSO Act and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, had …

Rakesh Mahto @ Rajeev RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Mahto (alias Rajeev Ranjan), was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 1,485 litres of liquor from a truck, alleged to violate Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code. The …

Saddamm Husain @ Sadam HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saddam Hussain, was arrested after a police encounter in which a vehicle carrying illicit liquor was intercepted and the occupants opened fire. The police recovered 549 litres of country-made liquor, a pistol, and a live cartridge, but the petitioner claims none of these items were …

Ravi Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that he, while intoxicated, assaulted an informant’s wife and daughter, attempted to outrage modesty and stole …

Bhim Bali NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhim Bali, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police recovered 210 litres of illicit country-made liquor. He contended that he was falsely implicated based solely on a chowkidar's disclosure, that no liquor was …

Bhola SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bhola Sahani was arrested in connection with the recovery of 265 litres of liquor from a river bank and charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the …

Udan Yadav @ Arun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Udan Yadav was arrested in connection with a case alleging that 108 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles, charging him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating article was found in his …

Abhishek Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Singh, sought bail in a case (Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025) involving alleged possession of 459 litres of country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered from two motorcycles and …

Niraj Chaudhary @ Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 108 litres of liquor recovered from an auto‑rickshaw, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor was found …

Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 324 litres of liquor from a vehicle and charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no knowledge of the contraband, and that no incriminating …

Sanjay Kumar @ SanjayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with an excise case alleging possession of 84.6 litres of liquor recovered from a Mahindra XUV, violating Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no incriminating …

Anjani Kumar @ AnjaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anjani Kumar, a co‑driver, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 84.6 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no knowledge of the liquor and that no …

Mithilesh Rai @ Jharkat RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithilesh Rai was arrested in connection with the recovery of 320 litres of country‑made liquor, of which 105 litres were found behind his house, under sections 30(a), 30(c), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, no material was …

Vinod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinod Yadav and Rudra Pratap Singh, driver and co‑driver of a bus, were arrested for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 21(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 1,786.275 litres of liquor were recovered from the vehicle. The petitioners contended they had no knowledge of the …

Rupash Yadav @ Rupesh Yadav @ ChuhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rupash Yadav, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 1,363.5 liters of liquor from an abandoned building and a car, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no ownership of the premises or …

Rajesh Kumar PathakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar Pathak and Pranav Kumar, were arrested in connection with the seizure of 1,753.920 liters of foreign liquor from a Mahindra vehicle driven by the first petitioner, with both found inside the vehicle. They were charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar …

Lalu Kumar @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was arrested in connection with an Excise case (No. 573 of 2025) for alleged possession of 200 litres of country-made liquor recovered from an auto. He contended that he was merely a passenger, not the driver or owner, and had no knowledge of the contraband, asserting his …

Om Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 187.200 litres of liquor recovered from a public mango orchard. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor was found in his …

Shambhu DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shambhu Das, was arrested in connection with a special case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 94 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that no incriminating article was found in his conscious …

Golu Kumar @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was arrested in Patahi for alleged possession of 765 litres of liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution claimed the liquor was recovered from a hut, but the petitioner asserted he had no connection to the premises, which …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for bail in an Excise case (No. 3050 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 140 litres of liquor was recovered from a scooty. The prosecution argued that the liquor was recovered, but the …

Dipesh Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dipesh Kumar Sahni was arrested in connection with the recovery of 180 litres of Nepali liquor from two motorcycles, alleged to be offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no ownership or …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Kumar was arrested after 225 litres of country‑made liquor were seized from a vehicle in Patna. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely a passenger, had no knowledge of the contraband, and that no incriminating …

Pankaj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pankaj Yadav, applied for bail in a case (PS Case No. 589 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 711 litres of liquor from a vehicle. The prosecution argued that the liquor was seized, while the petitioner …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 319.68 liters of liquor were recovered from a vehicle he was driving. He claimed innocence, stating he had no knowledge of the illicit liquor and that no …

Md. ShahidversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Md Shahid was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of spirit seized from a motorcycle and a shop. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and claiming he neither owned the seized vehicle nor had the …

Puna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Puna Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that the informant’s identity was omitted from the FIR. He argued that the police mechanically …

Pawan Mandal @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from properties linked to his relatives. He contended that the liquor was stored in a joint family …

Shanti Devi @ Shanti KuwarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shanti Devi, a woman with two prior excise cases, feared arrest after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a bush behind her hut. She contended that the liquor was not in her possession, the site did not …

Keshav RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Keshav Raj, was arrested in connection with an excise case (Case No. 3099 of 2025) alleging possession of 195 litres of illicit liquor, invoking Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered from the tempo …

Indrajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Khakhai village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor near Ramvilash Yadav's field. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor …

Shankar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shankar Paswan and Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle they owned. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in …

Bhadru Paswan @ Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bhadru Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under the NDPS Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 15.2 g of heroin, 2.81 g of ganja and 6 L of liquor recovered from Chandra Bhushan Kumar. He contended he had a clean …

Sita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sita Devi, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from her residence, which is a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …

Shivji RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivji Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a bush on land belonging to another person. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not arrested at the scene, and that the …

Vijay Rai @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Rai (Vijay Kumar) applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises adjacent to his house but not from his possession. He argued that the complaint originated from a chowkidar …

Mahavir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahavir Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 405 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession …

Aakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 110 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him. He argued that he was implicated solely on the testimony of a …

Munna ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Chauhan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a public bush. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, the FIR …

Sukesh Rai @ Sukesh Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sukesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery occurred at a location not under his possession and that his name was omitted from the FIR. The petitioner argued that the …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Uday Kumar, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 423 litres of Nepali liquor from a vehicle, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely a passer‑by and not the owner of the …

Vishal Kumar Chaudhary @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with the seizure of 35 litres of country‑made liquor from a motorcycle, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, was not the owner of the motorcycle, and no …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 70 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from a plastic sac outside his house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no liquor was …

Sunil Chaudhary @ Sunil Kumar @ GobarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Chaudhary, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycles, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 219.6 litres of liquor from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the …

Komal Mauraya @ VishalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Komal Mauraya and Vijay Maurya, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1111.60 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, had no possession of …

Anish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anish Kumar, was arrested as the driver of a pick‑up vehicle from which 1080 litres of liquor was seized, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no ownership of the vehicle, no knowledge of …

Unajesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Unajesh Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 260.1 liters of liquor recovered from a jute sack. He claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in his possession and that …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Aman Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 160 litres of country‑made liquor. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in his possession and that he had no …

Chandan @ Chhotu @ ChhotiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Chandan and Kariman sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 129 litres of liquor from a vehicle. They argued they had no conscious possession, were not owners of the seized vehicle, and the FIR …

Suresh SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Sah, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, had purchased the motorcycle from a third …

Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 100 litres of illicit liquor in an e‑rickshaw. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the contraband, …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Saurabh Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 46 litres of country-made liquor on a motorcycle. They claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, a bus conductor, was arrested after 105.84 litres of liquor were recovered from his bus in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no knowledge of the liquor and no incriminating material was found in his …

Kshitij RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kshitij Raj, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle from which 150 litres of liquor was seized, alleged to be in violation of Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, was not the owner of the car, and …

Anand ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anand Manjhi, a driver, was arrested in connection with a case involving the recovery of 360 litres of country‑made liquor from his vehicle, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that …

Nihal Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nihal Kumar Yadav, was arrested on 27 October 2025 after 126 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle, although he claimed he was merely a passerby and not the owner. He argued that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that the arrest was based solely on …

Sandeep RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 1,442.88 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a truck. He contended that he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the contraband, asserting that no …

Ratish Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ratish Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 360 litres of Nepali liquor and charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged possession of the …

Somar RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Somar Ravidas, a driver, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 120.240 litres of liquor. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no liquor was found in his possession and he had no knowledge of the goods, and …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rekha Devi, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 100 litres of liquor were recovered from an open area behind her house. She claimed innocence, stating that no liquor was found in her possession, she has no criminal …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Uday Kumar, was arrested after 100 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycle, no incriminating material was found in his possession, and he was …

Gudiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gudiya Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 8.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was a woman, and had no conscious …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 111.04 litres of liquor from vehicles he owned. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of any misuse of his vehicle by a co‑accused. …

Arvind Yadav @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arvind Yadav, was arrested in connection with an excise case (PS Case No. 910 of 2025) for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no …

Ujjwal Kant SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ujjwal Kant Singh, was arrested as a passenger in a vehicle from which 195 litres of country-made liquor were seized, leading to charges under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, was not the …

Dudheshwar Singh @ Dudhay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dudheshwar Singh, was arrested after 100 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of incriminating material in his personal possession, and that …

Sardar NoniaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sardar Nonia, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from a bicycle. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered, but the petitioner claimed innocence, stating he neither …

Rupesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rupesh Yadav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 81 litres of liquor from an auto and a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested after 141.24 liters of liquor were recovered from his joint house and charged under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Prashant Kumar @ Prashant Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prashant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNSS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 36.75 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He contended that the …

Bablu SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bablu Sahni, was arrested for alleged possession of 30 litres of liquor recovered from a plastic box near a riverbank, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of or involvement with the recovered liquor, that the …

Vishavjit Singh @ Mantu Singh @ Bishwajit SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishavjit Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 32(3), 36, 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7,555.68 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …

Ranjeet Manjhi @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 87.5 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He claimed innocence, arguing that no liquor was found in his personal possession and that the …

Mukesh GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Giri was arrested after 312 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycles, no incriminating material was found in his possession, he had no …

Anil NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Noniya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 2,200 litres of spirit and three motorcycles were seized. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the owner of …

Md. RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Raja, was arrested in connection with an excise case alleging possession of 12.5 litres of liquor recovered from a jute sack, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in his possession and that …

RAJEEV YADAV @ RAJIV KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajeev Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged possession of 105 litres of liquor, two motorcycles and other articles, and charged under Section 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. …

Dharmendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Mahto, was arrested in connection with an excise case where 60 litres of country‑made liquor was recovered from a jute sack. He asserted that he was falsely implicated, noting that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that the recovery occurred in an …

SUKHARI BINDversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sukhari Bind and Gudiya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 11.48 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor …

RAM KUMAR @ RAJ KUMAR BIND @ RAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Kumar, was arrested after 9.54 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycle, no incriminating material was found in his possession, and that …

Mukesh Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar Sah was arrested as the driver of a pick‑up vehicle from which 1,575 litres of liquor were seized, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was not the owner of the vehicle, had no knowledge of the …

Lal Bihari Mukhiya @ Lalbihari NishadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Bihari Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 23,400 litres of liquor from a plastic sack. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Akshay Kumar @ Akshay SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akshay Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,128 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the seized vehicles, and was implicated …

Dula DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dula Devi, was arrested in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 769C2 of 2025 for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 2 litres of liquor were said to have been recovered from her. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that no …

Laxman YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 130 litres of liquor, violating Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the goods, and that no …

Munna MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Mahto was arrested in connection with a case alleging the recovery of 240 litres of liquor from an open area near a river, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was found in his …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 330 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from a vehicle. The petitioner contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle, that no incriminating material …

Ranjeet Saw @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Saw, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 80 litres of liquor were recovered from his jointly occupied house. He contended that he had no direct possession of the liquor, no criminal antecedents, and …

Koyali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Koyali Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing six litres of liquor recovered from a straw house on her premises. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the straw house is accessible …

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chhotu Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 290 litres of country‑made liquor from two motorcycles, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely a passer‑by, not the owner of the vehicles, and that …

Rikki KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rikki Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 120 litres of country-made liquor from an e‑rickshaw, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession, and had no …

Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 97.740 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from a room in the house he was renting. He claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was found in a shared rented …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – three residents of Lilari village – applied for bail in an excise case (No. 1632 of 2025) arising from the recovery of 65 litres of country‑made liquor near a river, alleged to be offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged the …

Wakil RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Wakil Rai was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 185 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from a boat. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the liquor, no criminal antecedent, and that the recovery was …

Mosafir Paswan @ Musafir PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mosafir Paswan was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 126.45 litres of liquor were recovered from an open place. The petitioner claimed he had no possession of the liquor, no incriminating material was found on him, and he was falsely …

Randhir Kumar Ray @ Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Randhir Kumar Ray was arrested in connection with Chapra Rail PS Case No. 222 of 2025 for alleged possession of 45 liters of foreign liquor recovered from a bag, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Md. Ahasan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Ahasan Alam, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 37.71 liters of liquor recovered at Chapra Railway Station. He contended that he was merely present at the station to board a train and had no …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Santosh Kumar and Prince Kumar, were arrested in connection with an Excise case (No. 464 of 2025) for alleged possession of 270 litres of Nepali liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They claimed they were merely the driver and passenger of the …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rohit Kumar and Bikky Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 24.99 liters of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. They claimed innocence, stating they were merely passersby and that no incriminating …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 1,143 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered from a pickup van, but the petitioner claimed he was merely …

Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Kumar @ Santosh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with the recovery of 285.6 litres of liquor from a car, facing charges under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 41(1) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle, that no …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He claimed innocence, stating he neither owned the motorcycle nor had any involvement with the …

Umesh PasiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Pasi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a sand ghat. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized items, and was implicated …

Rintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rintu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that 255.90 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a tempo, charging him under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the …

Ravibhushan Thakur @ Ravibhusan ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravibhushan Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 207.38 litres of liquor from his auto-rickshaw. He argued that he was not present at the spot, no liquor was found in …

Shashi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shashi Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged liquor seizure was from a third party's premises and that he had no possession or …

Shri Narayan RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shri Narayan Ram and Amar Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 67 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from their jointly occupied house. They contended that they had no conscious possession of the …

Ram Nath ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Nath Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging that 10 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession of …

Dipak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dipak Kumar and Sanjay Tiwary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 3.6 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was located in a joint family house, that they had no conscious …