Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

4528 judgments · newest first · showing 4401–4528

Ram Kumar Sahni @ Raj Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Kumar Sahni, a labourer, was in custody for a 2019 case (PS‑85) involving the alleged recovery of 2,623 litres of illicit liquor from a truck, alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 41(i) and 42(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no conscious …

Shahin KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shahin Khatun, a female bus driver, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 324 litres recovered from the bus she was operating. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in her conscious physical possession because the bus …

Aman Kumar @ AmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case of illegal trading and manufacturing of illicit liquor (Case No. 14 of 2022) under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, after the recovery of …

Rambabu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rambabu Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 99.6 litres of liquor from an auto and two bags. He asserted that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was …

Prakash KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Prakash Kumar and Om Prakash Manjhi, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They had previously been granted bail but had inadvertently omitted their criminal antecedents—two for the first petitioner and one for the …

Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 75 litres of liquor in a plastic bag on his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sachin Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving 378 litres of illicit liquor, alleged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 32, 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence and offered to donate Rs.30,000 to …

Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rakesh Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 2,200 litres of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed innocence and …

Veena Devi @ Bina KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Veena Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was a woman, and was …

Rakesh DhangadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Dhangad, filed an application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 23 September 2025 that had extended his surrender period by four weeks in a case under sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner requested an additional extension …

Bhikhar Sao @ Bhakhri Sao @ Sahbir Sao @ Shahveer SawversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhikhar Sao, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 720 litres of liquor from a car. He has three prior cases but was not arrested at the scene and no liquor was found in his possession; he was implicated solely on suspicion …

YURAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Yuraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 11.25 litres of liquor, a bag and a seized motorcycle. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor or the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for regular bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 5,964 litres of spirit were seized from a truck in a case registered as Taraiya P.S. Case No. 462/2024. He claimed innocence, alleging that he was falsely implicated based on …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 14,400 litres of liquor from a banana orchard. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, …

Tinku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tinku Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 936 litres of liquor from a white pickup van. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Md. GudduversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Guddu, was arrested in connection with a raid that recovered 18 litres of beer and 11.4 litres of Nepali liquor, alleged to violate Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, arguing …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by Jitendra Kumar and Ranjan Kumar, who were arrested in connection with a seizure of 7,500 tablets of Anxit and 1,550 bottles of Onrex cough syrup, alleged to be illegal narcotics and illicit liquor under the NDPS Act and the Bihar Prohibition …

Sonu MallahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sonu Mallah was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, after police intercepted vehicles and seized liquor and weapons. The prosecution alleged that Mallah assisted occupants of a …

Tilak RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Tilak Raj, a driver from Himachal Pradesh, was arrested after police seized 2,311.38 litres of illicit liquor from three vehicles and alleged possession of arms, charging him under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the Arms Act. The petitioner contended he was merely driving the truck, had no …

Lal Mohan Rai @ Lalmohan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lal Mohan Rai, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 170 litres of illicit country-made liquor, 1,000 litres of solution, four illegal liquor kilns, and raw materials, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he …

Mukesh Kumar @ Manohar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case of alleged smuggling of 390 litres of Nepali illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution claimed he was identified from a seized motorcycle, while the petitioner contended he was falsely implicated, …

Dhiraj Kumar Singh @ Dhiraj Singh @ Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged smuggling of foreign liquor, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s case was based on a raid …

RANJAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Jitendra Kumar and Ranjan Kumar were arrested in connection with PS Pirbahore case No. 602 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 21 and 22(b)(b) of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after a police raid seized large quantities of narcotic tablets …

Chotu Kumar @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chotu Kumar, a driver, was arrested after police seized 87.75 litres of foreign liquor from his vehicle and he was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor, was merely a driver, and had a clean antecedent, seeking …

Md Nausad @ Md NaushadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Naushad and Chandan Kumar, were arrested during a police patrol when a car they were traveling in was found to contain 300.48 litres of foreign liquor, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They claimed to be merely the …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, …

Prahlad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prahlad Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 81 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He contended that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no …

Sudhakant ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhakant Chaudhary, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing four litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean record, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Ramesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,950 litres of liquor from a pit and two scooters. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, …

Makun RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Makun Ram, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 48.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the …

Ankit Kumar @ Ankit SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and Aniket Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.991/2025) involving alleged possession of 500 ml of liquor and three empty cartridges, offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar …

Vishnu Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishnu Kumar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that he was implicated merely as the owner of a vehicle from which liquor was recovered, without any personal possession of the contraband. The petitioner …

Lalit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lalit Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a raid that uncovered 105 litres of country-made liquor, two motorcycles and raw materials, leading to charges under Section 111 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely a …

Rakesh Kumar @ GolaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,950 litres of liquor from two scooties. He argued he had no conscious possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and had a clean …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor and 1500 litres of semi‑prepared Mahua from a river bank, a public place. He argued that nothing was …

Deepak Ray @ Deepak Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 197.88 litres of liquor from a washroom tank adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

MUKESH KUMAR JAYSAWAL @ MUKESH JAISWALversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar Jaiswal, arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly selling liquor, sought bail while in custody. The prosecution alleged that a police raid recovered 87.46 litres of liquor from the open backyard of his house. The petitioner claimed he was …

Hemant GohaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Hemant Goha and Manoj Singh, were arrested after police intercepted a car carrying 309.975 litres of liquor and alleged they were involved in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, had no …

Rajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajan Kumar, owner of a truck, was implicated in the seizure of 90.3 litres of liquor from his vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and that the liquor was not found in …

BALBIR SAHNIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Balbir Sahni and Mantosh Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from an orchard not belonging to them. They asserted they have clean antecedents, were not caught in …

Nandan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandan Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly having 7.45 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's misuse of the …

Arun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arun Sahni applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 35 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …

Pattu Ram @ Mantu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pattu Ram, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69.12 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his …

Kanchan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanchan Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a motorcycle she owned was seized with 2.16 litres of liquor, implicating her under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was a woman, and had no knowledge of her husband’s …

Mangal BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mangal Bind sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 60 litres of liquor were recovered from four accused. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that his implication relied solely on a confessional statement of …

Sattan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sattan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 413 and 414 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30 and 30(a) for alleged recovery of 335 litres of liquor and two motorcycles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Vicky Kumar Sinha @ Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vicky Kumar Sinha, a co‑driver, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 2,000 bottles of codeine syrup under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he had no knowledge of the contraband, had a clean record, and that the co‑accused had already been granted bail. The …

Amit Kumar @ ChintuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amit Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.250 litres of liquor recovered from a house that forms part of a joint family property adjacent to a petrol pump. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …

Md Amanullah @ AmanullahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md Amanullah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 61.2 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's …

Nandlal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nandlal Singh and Ankit Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 866.52 litres of liquor recovered from a joint family house and an auto. They argued that no liquor was found in their …

Pappu Yadav @ Ravindra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public bush near Chalho Hill. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the location did not …

Hesamuddin KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Hesamuddin Khan and Raju Kumar, were arrested as driver and co‑driver of a truck from which 600 litres of cough syrup were seized, and were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they had no conscious possession of the contraband, …

Rajendra Rai @ Rajendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajendra Rai, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted a clean antecedent, argued that the liquor was …

Usha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 10 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, making …

Pappu Kumar Gupta @ Pappu Kumar Shah @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.6 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house being …

Manjit Chaurasiya @ Manjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjit Chaurasiya sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 55.720 litres of liquor from Ganauri Mandal, with which he claimed no connection. The petitioner argued that no liquor was …

Pradyut SamantaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradyut Samanta, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 2,646.72 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the …

Madhurendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a B.Sc. Nursing student, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.135/2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the POCSO Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The allegations stem from a neighbour dispute where the …

Abdul WadudversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Abdul Wadud was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the motorcycle had been stolen before the incident, that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …

Dharmshila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmshila Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned, under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6.75 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of …

Shrawan YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shrawan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 9.160 litres of liquor from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 954 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, that the case was based on secret information, …

Sumangal Kumar Rai @ Sumangal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 954 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, that the case was based on secret information, …

Sushant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sushant Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged involvement in the recovery of 240.3 litres of liquor from behind a temple. He claimed he was falsely implicated, had no possession of the liquor, and was not …

Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Avinash Kumar, a resident of Nawada, was arrested as the driver of a car from which police recovered 65 litres of illicit mahua liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband and was …

Pankaj Poddar @ Pankaj PodarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pankaj Poddar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 152.72 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a shop owned by Barun Kumar, and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, had no involvement with the shop or co‑accused, and …

Vinay Chaudhary @ Vinay ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinay Chaudhary, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 8 litres of illicit country‑made liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he had no knowledge of or control over the liquor found in the …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, was arrested during a police raid that recovered 280 litres of cough syrup from a tempo and 750 litres from a godown, and is charged under Sections 30(a), 30(g), 32, 56(b) and 62 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contends that he was merely a passerby, has no …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Rai @ Mukesh RoyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar, who is in custody, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 22.5 litres of illicit liquor were seized from his joint family house. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he had no connection with the seized liquor, but the …

Naresh SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Naresh Sah, who was in custody since 17 November 2025, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police raided a hut behind his house and recovered 7.125 litres of foreign liquor. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jitendra Kumar was arrested in connection with a seizure of 230.14 litres of foreign liquor and related items under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed to be merely a labourer with no ownership of the seized car and asserted no involvement in the illicit consignment, …

Pappu Kumar Rai @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Rai, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 43 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was recovered from an open place, he had no involvement, and he …

Bhulan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhulan Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police recovered 50 litres of illicit country‑made liquor from a public ghat. The prosecution’s case relied on secret information and informants who identified the …

BITTU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bittu Kumar and Akhilesh Sahani, were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 160 litres of illicit liquor. They contended that they were not caught at the scene, no contraband was found on …

Saukhin Rawat @ Saukhim RawatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saukhin Rawat, was arrested in connection with a raid that recovered 57.5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from the village of Sargatti, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely a passerby and had been …

Baban RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Baban Rai, who has been in custody since 12 November 2025, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 50 litres of country-made liquor were seized from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed he was unaware of the liquor and was falsely implicated, …

Bhim Manjhi @ Jainath Manjhi @ Jaynath ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhim Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 20 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from the outside of his house. He contended that he was innocent, that the liquor was in a …

Subodh Kumar @ Subhodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Subodh Kumar, who was in custody, applied for bail in an excise case (Case No. 3160 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 210 litres of illicit liquor were recovered and he was apprehended at the scene. The petitioner claimed he was merely a passerby and had no …

Md. NazirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Nazir, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 360 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor was found in his possession, and that he has a …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Golu Kumar and Amarnath Kumar, were arrested as driver and co‑driver of a vehicle from which 225 litres of foreign liquor was seized, and were charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They pleaded that they were unaware of the contraband, were …

Suman Kumar @ Soman Kumar @ Suman Gop @ Suman Kumar GopversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of mahua liquor from a motorcycle parked outside his house. He contended that the liquor was found in an open, public area …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar, a driver of a tractor, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 666 litres of foreign liquor concealed under stone‑chips, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner, who has four prior criminal convictions …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested on 28 Oct 2025 after police seized 1,128 litres of foreign liquor from a vehicle and alleged his involvement under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor was found in his possession, …

Lal Ji MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lal Ji Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 500 ml of illicit liquor was seized from a pick‑up van in which he was present. He claimed innocence, stating he neither owned the vehicle nor had any knowledge of …

Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mantu Kumar, a driver, was arrested after 400 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from a toto vehicle he was operating, leading to charges under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He pleaded innocence, asserting he had no knowledge of the contraband and that none …

Bablu ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bablu Chaudhari, was arrested after 31 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from a roadside location where he was allegedly attempting to flee. He is charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and has three prior criminal antecedents, for …

Rajnath Kumar @ Rajnath RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a tractor driver, was arrested for allegedly transporting 4,625 kg of rotten jaggery intended for illicit country‑made liquor and for the seizure of 12 litres of mahua liquor, offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended …

Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case (PS No.161 of 2000) under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court noted that the case dates back to the year 2000 and that regular bail processes under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal …

Ishwar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Rohtas district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. They argued that they were not in possession of the …

Krishna Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishna Kumar Gupta, the owner of a vehicle from which 18 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, asserting he had a clean criminal record and was unaware that his driver Sonu misused the vehicle. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered from his car, implicating him …

Mahanth KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahanth Kumar, a resident of West Champaran, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering nine litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and that the only link to him …

Gaurav Kumar @ Butan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where six litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a scooty not owned by him. He argued that the seizure was based on secret information and that no …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, arising from a land‑dispute incident involving alleged firing and assault. The petitioner contended that he was …

Anuj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anuj Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware of his …

Vijay MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Mahato was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 849.54 litres of liquor and a motorcycle, with six prior excise cases among a total of seven criminal antecedents. He was not arrested at the scene and the prosecution’s case relied on a …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 160 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at …

Devratiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devratiya Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of six litres of liquor recovered from her house and eight litres from other locations. She argued that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, that she …

Jitendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor near a toilet, which he claims was not in his possession and was reported by a chowkidar. He has two prior cases …

Amit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 480 litres of liquor from his Scorpio. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, …

Teni SoniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Teni Soni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that no arrest was made at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …

Sanjay Rai @ Sanjay PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 7 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Sunaina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunaina Devi, feared arrest in a case alleging possession of 7.5 litres of liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, not in her …

Biru Kumar @ Biru Yadav @ Akhilesh Rai @ Akhilesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Biru Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged 13.8 litres of liquor was recovered from a public place and not from his possession, and that the only evidence was a confessional …

Twinkle Bhagat @ Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Twinkle Bhagat @ Vivek Kumar, was arrested after police recovered 40 liters of cough syrup from his car, leading to charges under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the location of the seizure and was implicated merely …

SajidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sajid, the owner of a truck from which 6,069.96 litres of foreign liquor were seized, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He has been in custody since 19 December 2024 and earlier obtained a liberty order to renew his bail application after four months. The …

Fulo DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four individuals from Lakhisarai district, were arrested after police intercepted them and recovered 50 litres of codeine cough syrup from an open road. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the contraband was not in their conscious possession, and that they have no …

Md. Rayees @ RaisversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Rayees, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after a police raid recovered 15 litres of Eskuf syrup and he was alleged to have helped the primary accused escape. Rayees contended that he was falsely implicated, that no …

Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of a truck carrying 4,176 litres of foreign liquor, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(i),(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and that …

SandeepversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep, a driver from Haryana, was arrested when police intercepted a truck carrying 6,228.36 litres of illicit liquor, leading to charges under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, asserting that he was merely following …

Loha MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Loha Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police recovered 17 litres of illicit liquor from his open courtyard. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor's presence, arguing that the space was …

Arvind Yadav @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arvind Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police recovered 75 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that no contraband was found in his …

Binod Kumar RajakversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Kumar Rajak, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, …

Kanhaiya Rai @ Kanhaiya YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 400 litres of spirit were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the police had mechanically implicated him without …

Dablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 1,093.01 litres of liquor recovered from a room in a shop run by his brother. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in …

Mehsi Devi @ Parwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mehsi Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a joint family house. The petitioner argued she had no conscious possession, the …

Dudhnath ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dudhnath Manjhi was arrested in connection with an assault case (PS Bishambharpur Case No. 69 of 2025) alleging that he and co‑accused beat the informant's son with a lathi, danda and iron rod, causing serious injuries. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, citing his age (61), lack of …

Sitaram BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sitaram Bind, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.5 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, has a clean antecedent, and …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, …

Jaspreet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jaspreet Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 3,438 litres of liquor were seized, was charged under several IPC provisions (188, 420, 467, 468, 471/34) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (30(a), 32(i)(ii), 41). He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that he was …

Mukesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Sahni sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that liquor was recovered from his straw house in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his immediate possession, and that the straw …

Ful Kumari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ful Kumari Devi, owner of a motorcycle from which 102.375 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a …

Bhulli DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhulli Devi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor from a jointly owned family house. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the property was a joint family …

Naval Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naval Kishor Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 2006.64 litres of liquor from a pick‑up and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Pradip ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pradip Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 25 litres of liquor and 180 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He applied for anticipatory …

Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Randhir Kumar, the owner of two scooties from which 70 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C., claiming he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that others misused his vehicles. He argued that his clean antecedent and lack …