Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957

21 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 109422 November 2018Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from the sealing of an illegal dairy in Gokalpur, Delhi, which was ordered by the Veterinary Services Department of the East Delhi Municipal Corporation under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. The seal was broken by elected Member of Parliament Manoj Tiwari, leading

AMRIK SINGH LYALLPURIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2011 INSC 32421 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Amrik Singh Lyallpuri, a journalist, challenged the statutory provision that appeals from decisions of the Appellate Tribunal under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 and the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 must be heard by the Administrator (the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi). The issue was whether such an

SHELLY OBEROI & ANR.versusOFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.

2023 INSC 13217 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, including a prospective mayoral candidate, challenged the conduct of the first meeting of the Delhi Municipal Corporation after the 2022 elections, seeking clarification on whether members nominated under Section 3(3)(b)(i) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 have voting rights in the election

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusDHAR MA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.

2017 INSC 91415 September 2017Case Partly allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi issued a notice under Section 126 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 on 25 March 1998 proposing to increase the rateable value of Dharma Properties' premises w.e.f. 1 April 1997; the notice was dispatched on 27 March but received by the assessee only on 4 April 1998. The ass

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 49214 August 2020Directions issued

The Supreme Court revisited a writ petition filed in 1985 concerning environmental and land‑use violations in Delhi. The Court examined whether the Monitoring Committee, appointed in 2006 to curb the misuse of residential premises for commercial purposes, had the authority to seal residential properties on private land

MOHINDER SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND ANOTHERversusNARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 22314 March 2023Dismissed

The appellants claimed that they had acquired possession of a village plot in Delhi before the respondents obtained a registered sale deed and mutation in 1989, and they challenged the mutation on the ground of adverse possession, leading the Financial Commissioner to set aside the mutation and vest the land in the Gao

DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARDversusPRAVEEN KUMAR

2016 INSC 120811 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) advertised a Teacher (Primary) post for Municipal Corporation of Delhi schools in 2009 with an age limit of 20-27 years. Praveen Kumar was declared ineligible as over‑age and challenged the decision, relying on a Delhi High Court judgment in Sachin Gupta that had g

IN RE: “CITY HOUNDED BY STRAYS, KIDS PAY PRICE” versus

2025 INSC 97711 August 2025Directions issued

The Supreme Court, acting suo moto, examined a dramatic rise in dog bite incidents across India, especially in the National Capital Region, which disproportionately affected visually‑impaired persons, children, the elderly and the poor. Data presented showed a steep increase in reported bites and highlighted the public

M.C.D. & ANR.versusM/S. MEHRASONS JEWELLERS (P) LTD.

2015 INSC 56011 August 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two sets of appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) against Mehrsons Jewellers concerning the determination of rateable value for property tax. The first issue was whether assessments made after the 1994 Delhi Municipal Corporation (Determination of Rateable Value) Bye‑Laws

JAGHBIR SINGH & ORS.versusP. K. TRWATHI, CHIEF SECY., GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2017 INSC 59710 July 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court had earlier ordered the closure and relocation of industrial units operating in residential or non‑conforming areas of Delhi, directing that such premises be sealed and only de‑sealed upon an undertaking not to resume industrial activity. Respondent Sanjay Gupta, the occupier of premises at 87/1 Villa

KHATRI HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2011 INSC 6679 September 2011Dismissed

The appellants, Khatri Hotels Private Ltd. and another, claimed title and sought an injunction over land they alleged to have purchased. The land had been urbanised under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 and transferred to the Delhi Development Authority (DOA) by notification under the Delhi Development Act, 1

GAINDA RAM AND OTHERSversusM.C.D. AND OTHERS

2010 INSC 7018 October 2010Disposed off

The petitioners, street hawkers and vendors in Delhi, challenged actions of the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) and Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) that restricted their hawking activities, claiming a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g). The Supreme Court reiterated that this right is subject to reasonable

ATMA RAM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.versusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2017 INSC 11966 December 2017Dismissed

The landlord Atma Ram Properties sued its tenant Oriental Insurance for possession, claiming that a huge property tax payable under the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 could be treated as arrears of rent, raising the total rent above Rs.3,500 per month and thereby removing the tenant’s protection under the Delhi

PRADEEP OIL CORPORATIONversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.

2011 INSC 2786 April 2011Dismissed

Pradeep Oil Corporation was granted land by the Government under the Government Grants Act to erect petroleum storage tanks and related structures. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi assessed property tax on the tanks, treating them as "buildings". The corporation argued the grant was a lease, making the corporation li

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHIversusOFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI

2024 INSC 5785 August 2024Dismissed

The Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi challenged the Lieutenant Governor’s notifications nominating ten experts to the Delhi Municipal Corporation, arguing that the power must be exercised on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 239AA(4). The Court examined the constitutional

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERSversusR.K.B.K. LTD. & ANR.

2015 INSC 6434 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal appealed against an order of the Director of Consumer Goods that imposed a penalty on R.K.B.K. Ltd., a licensed kerosene oil agent, for alleged excess distribution. The dispute centered on whether the Director or the District Magistrate had authority under Paragraph 9 of the West Bengal Kerosen

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search