Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
822 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The petitioners, a 17-year‑old child in conflict with law (CICL), were charged under IPC sections 376, 341, 323, 504/34 and POCSO sections 4 and 6 for allegedly inducing a 12‑year‑old girl into a sexual relationship and causing pregnancy. The Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) denied bail, and the …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Roy, was charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the POCSO Act and the IT Act for allegedly raping a victim in a maize field, assaulting her, and producing an obscene video. He has been in custody since April 24, 2024 and applied for regular bail. The prosecution …
Akhilesh Kumar, a shopkeeper, was accused of making vulgar comments, attempting to assault, and alleged sexual offences under Sections 351(2), 352, 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8, 12 of the POCSO Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that the allegations …
Petitioner Ravi Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, alleged to have engaged in a physical relationship under the pretext of marriage and then refusing to marry. The informant, a …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that, as a driver of the informant, he secretly recorded pornographic videos of the informant and her minor daughter, blackmailed them, forced sexual relations, attempted molestation, and stole money and jewellery. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging kidnapping of the informant's minor daughter and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. He contended that the FIR was fabricated and that the victim, in a statement recorded …
The petitioners, three women, were named in an FIR alleging kidnapping of a 16‑year‑old girl for illicit intercourse or marriage, under sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. They contended that the allegations arose from a …
The appellant was convicted by a Special Judge under IPC Section 376 (rape) and POCSO Act Section 4 for allegedly raping his 16‑year‑old sister. The prosecution’s case relied on the sister’s written application, the victim’s prior statement recorded under CrPC Section 164, and medical evidence, …
Kundan Kumar was arrested on 27 September 2022 in connection with a POCSO case involving alleged rape, assault, intimidation and attempts to poison the victim, as alleged in FIR dated 25 November 2019. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the trial was still pending, while the State highlighted …
Kajal Kumari petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 76 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. She emphasized her clean antecedent and that she is a woman. The petitioner relied on a prior …
The appellant Sadir Quaraishi was convicted by a Special Judge under Section 376AB of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for the alleged rape of a five‑year‑old girl, based largely on the victim’s testimony and a delayed FIR. The appellant appealed, arguing that the four‑day delay in lodging the …
Neeraj Kumar was charged under Section 70(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. He applied for regular bail while in judicial custody since 31.05.2025. The trial court had already examined four of six prosecution witnesses. The …
The petitioner, Daniya Karisma, sought bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged threats, assault and sexual offences under IPC and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner threatened the victim on 15‑08‑2022, while the defence argued the FIR was lodged after a long delay, …
The petitioner, Amarnat Sahni, was charged with gang rape, kidnapping, and related offences under Sections 448, 342, 376(D), 504/34 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused entered the informant's house, abducted her minor daughter and …
The petitioner, Khursid Anwar (also known as Jawed Chaudhary), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Mahila Police Station Case No. 19 of 2026, which alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 376, 506, 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 8. The prosecution alleged that Faiz Azam and another …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 96 and 137 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act for allegedly abducting a 17‑year‑old girl. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the …
The petitioner, Pintu Khalifa, sought regular bail in a case where a raid on his residence uncovered a victim girl and alleged that the premises were being used as a brothel. The prosecution charged him under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, the …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving the alleged death of a 16‑year‑old girl and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assisted the main accused, Deepak Kumar, by …
The petitioner, Ajay Sahni, feared arrest in a 2019 case (Bochahan P.S. Case No. 383) involving multiple IPC offences (sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379) and offences under the POCSO Act (sections 8 and 10). He filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During …
The petitioner, Govinda Paswan, was named in a complaint alleging molestation of a 15‑year‑old girl under Section 354(A) IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, allegedly arising from a land dispute. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the allegations were vague, the incident was non‑penetrative, and …
The petitioner, Md. Raees, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged rape of a minor, dowry harassment, and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Dowry Prohibition Act, IPC and the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that the petitioner raped the informant when she was a minor, …
The petitioners, Rohit Kumar, Sulendra Mehta and Pancho Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 363, 366A and POCSO Act Section 8 concerning alleged kidnapping of a minor. They contended that the informant’s allegations were false, the police …
Rohi Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving murder (Sec. 302 IPC), abetment of murder (Sec. 201 IPC), conspiracy (Sec. 34 IPC), kidnapping (Sec. 364 IPC), rape (Sec. 376 IPC) and an offence under Sec. 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner had earlier been denied regular bail by the …
Vikrant Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged sexual exploitation of a minor, blackmail, and other offences under sections 308(3), 64(1), 126(2), 72, 352 of the Indian Penal Code and section 8 of the POCSO Act. The informant alleged that the petitioner had taken a minor, …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was charged with kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The minor’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code alleged that the petitioner and an accomplice …
Balram Tanti was arrested in connection with a POCSO case alleging that he, along with a co‑accused, raped the minor daughter of an informant. The petitioner pleaded innocence, asserting that the medical examination of the victim showed no signs of sexual assault and that he was being framed to …
The petitioner, Sanjay Sharma, was charged in Raghopur P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024 with offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 506, 376 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6, alleged to have raped a 14‑year‑old girl. The victim corroborated the allegations in a statement recorded under Section 164 of the …
The petitioner, Ravishankar Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and POCSO Act sections 6 and 8 for allegedly sexually abusing the informant's minor daughter over six years after reneging on a marriage promise. He has been in custody since 16 June 2024 and …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar, was charged with kidnapping and murdering the minor daughter of an informant, with the case originally registered in 2015. The prosecution alleged offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and the POCSO Act. …
The petitioner, Krishna Bind, was arrested in connection with a police case alleging harassment, threats, and assault under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s informant claimed the petitioner threatened a girl and assaulted …
The petitioner, Bitu Kumar, owner of an orchestra, was arrested for allegedly forcing two minor girls to perform and torturing them. He faced charges under multiple statutes, including the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, the Juvenile Justice …
The petitioner, Amit Paswan, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Gurua P.S. Case No. 39 of 2023) and charged under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, with the charge‑sheet also invoking Sections 366(A) and 377(3) IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed …
The petitioners, Shobha Devi and Sita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case involving kidnapping, rape, and other offences under Sections 363, 366A, 34, 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents, are …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shoaib, accused in a rape case involving sections of the IPC, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Shoaib stood guard while the co‑accused committed the offence, but the victim’s statements were inconsistent and she …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Amit in a criminal case (Crime No.110 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the IPC, the 2023 BNS provisions, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The State Law Officer informed the court that a notice to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi @ Lukka in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 70(2), 127(2), 137(2), 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, pointing to discrepancies in the collection and sealing of the …
Majibullah applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.131 of 2025) alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religion Conversion Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was filed five days after the …
The applicant, Hashim, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 78, 137(2), 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. The counsel highlighted a two‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, and argued that the alleged …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit @ Manish @ Mohit in a criminal case (Crime No. 335 of 2025) involving serious offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighting discrepancies in the collection and sealing of the victim’s …
Munna Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking permission to withdraw securities he had furnished in favor of the accused, Rajendra Singh, in a criminal appeal. The appeal pertained to a case involving offences under Sections 452, 354Kha, 504, 506 IPC, the …
The petitioners, Virichand Sah, Pinku Devi and Bhola Sah, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 366A, 34 and section 8 of the POCSO Act for alleged kidnapping of a minor for marriage. They contended that they were falsely implicated because they are relatives of …
Amarjeet Kumar was apprehended for alleged kidnapping under IPC sections 365, 366, 366A and POCSO Act section 4 in Bela P.S. Case No. 113 of 2020. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the police investigation had concluded with a final report exonerating him, yet cognizance was taken. He …
The petitioner, Julfiquar Khan, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with an iron pipe, threats to kidnap and marry a 13‑year‑old girl, and other offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) and the POCSO Act. He contended that he has a clean record, that the allegations stem from …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging his involvement in the forcible abduction of a 16‑year‑old minor. The prosecution’s case centered on Arun Patel and his …
The petitioners, Govinda Kumar and Sunny Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 64(1) and 70(2) of the BNS and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging they were innocent and that the matter had been settled. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners participated …
Arjun Pal was charged under Sections 64, 333, 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a 14‑year‑old girl, the informant's daughter, on 17 March 2025. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the victim had consented as per her statement …
Archana Kumari, a counsellor at a short‑stay home, was charged in a CBI investigation for offences under IPC sections 341, 342, 323, 504, 34, POCSO Act section 8 and later Juvenile Justice Act section 75, relating to alleged sexual exploitation of women inmates. She has been in custody since …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, filed a pre‑arrest bail application in a case alleging kidnapping and gang‑rape of a minor under Sections 376D/34 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, together with co‑accused, abducted the victim, took her to a …
The petitioners Chandan Kumar and Bhola Sahani were implicated in a case (PS Muffasil Lakhaura Case No. 486 of 2023) involving alleged attempts to commit sexual offences against a minor, with charges under several IPC sections, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. Petitioners sought bail; petitioner 1 …
The applicants Chand, Mausin, Rashid and Mohd. Nazim filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 31.08.2021 passed by the Special Court under the POCSO Act and to stay further proceedings. The application was initially filed for Chand, and …
Arjun applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under sections 363, 368, 376(d)(a), 506 of the IPC and sections 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act. This was his second bail application; the first was dismissed in July 2021. Counsel argued that the trial had already concluded, rendering the bail …
The applicant, Moharram @ Mohammad Husain, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 744 of 2017) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(i), 376(D), 372, 373 and sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. He argued that he was never charge‑sheeted, that the victim had consented, he had no prior …
The applicant, Tariq Ansari, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.248 of 2024) involving charges under IPC Section 333, Section 65(2) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5M and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the victim’s statement contained material contradictions, that the alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar Bharti, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 225 of 2024) alleging theft, rape and offences under the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and asserted that the alleged victim, a girl born on …
The applicant, Gurpreet Singh, sought bail in a case registered under Section 65(2) of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging that the charges of sexual assault on a five‑year‑old victim were false and stemmed from a family land dispute. The State opposed bail, emphasizing that the …
The applicant, Deena, filed a second bail application in a case registered as Crime No.81 of 2022 under Section 376DA of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He had been in custody since 19 March 2022, amounting to more than four years, and argued that the prolonged detention violated his …
The petitioner, Shiv Kumar, was arrested on 17 November 2025 in connection with offences under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the allegations were false, asserting that the victim, an …
Petitioner Ravindra Kumar Sah was arrested in connection with a case registered on 12 June 2023, facing charges under several IPC sections (363, 366A, 376, 323, 504/34), the POCSO Act (sections 4 and 6) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application …
Neha Kumari was arrested on 9 January 2026 in connection with a flesh‑trade case (Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.28 of 2026) and charged under multiple provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Act. She …
Rubi Khatoon, accused of involvement in flesh trade, was arrested on 9 January 2026 and charged under multiple provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Act. She applied for bail, asserting a clean …
Salma, a resident of Saharsa, was arrested on 9 January 2026 in connection with a flesh‑trade case (Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.28 of 2026) and charged under multiple provisions of the B.N.S., 2023, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Act. She applied …
The petitioners, three brothers, filed a petition seeking to quash the order dated 21.03.2024 in which a Special Court took cognizance against them under Section 376DA of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the brothers abducted and …
Bambam Singh was charged under Sections 376, 120(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 17 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor. The High Court had earlier denied regular bail, citing the gravity of the accusations and the victim’s statement recorded …
Petitioner Harshraj Sahni sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, alleging kidnapping of an informant's niece. The victim, recorded under Section 183 of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sahani, has been in custody since 4 January 2025 for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 366A, 504/34 arising from a 2018 FIR. He previously sought anticipatory bail in 2018, which was dismissed with a direction to surrender within four weeks; he failed to do so and …
Chhotan Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a girl. The petitioner contended that the girl, initially thought to be 17, was …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Ajay Kumar Mahto, who is charged under IPC sections 376, 457, 506, 120(B), Section 4 of the POCSO Act and several provisions of the SC/ST Act for the alleged rape of a minor. The prosecution presented medical evidence of a ruptured hymen, the …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged attempt to molest a 14‑year‑old girl, charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, arguing that he is 18 years old, has been in custody since …
The petitioner, Bhushan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving a 17‑year‑old girl, alleged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The girl’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS denied any kidnapping, …
Satendra Bind was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, rape, and forced marriage of a minor, with charges under the Bihar Nyaya Sanhita, the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The petitioner sought bail, arguing lack of prior criminal record and inconsistencies in the victim's …
The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old student, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS No. 502 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the POCSO Act, where he is accused of molesting a minor and assaulting the informant’s wife. The prosecution alleges that the …
The petitioner, Ashma Khatoon, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging that she was falsely implicated in the alleged sexual exploitation of a minor. The informant’s daughter, a 13‑year‑old, went missing …
The petitioner, Suman Kumar, an 18‑year‑old with a clean antecedent, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.40 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant's daughter and offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, citing a delayed FIR, …
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, sought regular bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 34, 341, 376‑D‑A, 504 and 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, relating to the alleged rape of a minor on 10‑04‑2020. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in the …
The petitioners, Nagina Mahto and Devpati Devi, relatives of co‑accused Punit Kumar, were arrested in connection with a kidnapping and sexual exploitation case (IPC §§366A, 34 and POCSO Act §8) involving a 16‑year‑old girl. They contended that they were falsely implicated because the victim’s …
Ram Chandra Yadav sought anticipatory bail after a complaint under Section 377 IPC and several provisions of the POCSO Act alleged that he had committed penetrative sexual assault on a minor. The complaint was filed on 5 January 2021, with the alleged incident dated New Year’s Day 2021, and the …
The petitioner, Md Maqbool, filed an anticipatory bail petition after being implicated in a case (Mahila P.S. Case No.46 of 2025) alleging sexual assault on his minor daughter under IPC sections 354, 354A and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged by his …
Petitioner Pintu Kumar was charged with molesting the minor daughter of a neighbour under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The petitioner sought regular bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the case was …
The petitioner, Kamaldev Prasad, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 376, 376(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, alleging rape of the informant's daughter. The trial was already at an advanced …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar Roy, was charged with kidnapping under IPC s.363, later amended to include IPC s.366A and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, for allegedly abducting the minor daughter of an informant. The victim was recovered and, under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC, gave a statement that …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 384 (extortion) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and POCSO Act sections 4 and 12, alleging that he had obtained and was threatening to publish sexual images of a minor for ransom. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Ajay Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.69 of 2023, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the FIR/charge sheet. The …
Alimaan Khan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 405 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 346 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim, who was 16 at the time of the alleged offence, had …
The applicant, Mujaffar @ Muzaffar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 513 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) IPC, 65(1) BNS, 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act and 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. The victim was a 16‑year‑old girl who, according to the statement recorded under Section …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 405 of 2018, which arose from a criminal case under IPC sections 354, 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 7/8, and to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and the proceedings under …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1814 of 2024) arising from offences under IPC Section 354 and Sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the applicant had earlier …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 249 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 74, 351(3) of the BNSS and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of an accused charged with offences under IPC Sections 376(3), 504, 506 and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of an 11‑year‑old deaf‑and‑dumb girl. The …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of the informant's minor daughter and offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The informant’s statement did not allege any sexual misconduct, and the petitioner contended that after the girl turned 18 she married …
The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old male, was charged under IPC Sections 366, 366A and POCSO Act Section 8 for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. He sought pre‑arrest bail, asserting that the relationship with the girl was consensual and that her statement recorded under Section 164 …
The petitioner, Md. Israfil, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of a 15-year‑11‑month‑old girl under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The girl’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated she left home of her own free will, and there …
The petitioners, Atma Devi, Ashok Sah and Neha Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Bariyarpur Case No. 51 of 2025, which alleges offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 69, 3(5) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a minor girl alleged that he molested her, threatened her life, and forced her to dance naked. The FIR charged him under Sections 75, 351(2), 351(3), and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 17 of the POCSO Act, with …
Amar Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 544 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the victim, an 18‑year‑old, had stated in a Section 183 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 326 of 2024 arising from a POCSO and IPC offences case. The application challenged the cognizance and summoning order dated 28.10.2024 …
Karan Bharti was arrested in connection with a rape case involving a girl born on 02‑12‑2008, alleged to have been enticed under false pretences and assaulted, with charges under IPC sections 137(2), 64(2), 351(2), 123 BNS and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The applicant, Mohd Nadeem, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 562 of 2025) involving charges under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, and other provisions. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act, claimed she was in love with the applicant and alleged that …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Preetam Kumar Gupta, who was arrested in connection with FIR No. 652 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, 64(2)M of the IPC and Sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Gupta, under the …
Petitioner Jainab Nisha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 6‑3‑2026 and the subsequent charge‑sheet filed under sections 221, 351(2) of the IPC, section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act and sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The State argued that the investigation was …
The applicant Sonu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial (No.320 of 2016) for offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO sections 3 and 4. He asserted that he had married the victim in 2016, they have two children, and the victim and her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was in custody for Crime No. 171 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the IPC, alleging abduction and marriage of a girl who was claimed to be a minor. Ravi contended that the relationship was consensual, the girl was now his wife, …
The applicant, Akash Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the pending POCSO trial (Session Trial No. 456 of 2017) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged …
Mohit @ Golu applied for bail in a case registered under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed three days after the alleged incident, the alleged victim was a consenting adult, and the matter was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sonu @ Ajay Kumar, who was charged under Sections 115(2) and 137(2) of the same Act and Sections 5K/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for alleged …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Ranjeet Kumar and others seeking to quash criminal proceedings instituted under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 120‑B and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicants demonstrated that the alleged victim had married …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sajid, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 716 of 2025) involving offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, including alleged rape and human trafficking of a minor. The FIR, lodged 18 days after the alleged incident, alleged that the applicant, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivnandan alias Aditya Mishra alias Alok Pandit, who was in custody since 26 January 2026 for offences under Sections 123, 142, 61(2), 70(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind @ Akash, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 123, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a minor. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged more than …
Vikas was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 83 of 2026) alleging that he and co‑accused Shiva Singh lured two girls, the daughter and niece of an informant, on 10 March 2026. The prosecution alleges offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash @ Raj Dhuriya, a 19‑year‑old accused under sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the IPC and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, …
The applicant, Mahendra Kumar Maurya, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Special Session Trial No. 272 of 2019, which involves offences under Sections 376, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The case, …
Laukush applied for bail in a case where he was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC, and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 14‑year‑old girl, stealing Rs 50,000 and ornaments, and being involved in a pregnancy that was later terminated. The prosecution argued …
The applicant, Faizan, was charged under IPC sections 65(1) and 351(2) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping his 13‑year‑old domestic helper on 18 April 2025. The prosecution alleged repeated sexual assaults, while the defence argued that the FIR was filed more than a month …
The applicant, Santosh Kamal, sought bail in a rape case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 39639 of 2025) where he is alleged to be the biological father of a child born to the victim, as established by DNA testing. He argued that his co‑accused had already been granted bail and that he had no …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Nizam, who was charged under IPC Sections 137(1), 65(1), 351(2) and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The prosecution alleged that the victim was assaulted after being taken from a nursery, with the FIR lodged five days …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by 19‑year‑old Abhishek Pal, who was arrested on charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the CrPC, Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended …
The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging outraging a woman's modesty under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75, 79 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s informant, a major, initially lodged …
The appellants, three Mukhiya brothers, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for rape, grievous hurt and related offences under Sections 376(D), 326, 324, 201/511 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based largely on the victim's testimony, a confessional statement of a co‑accused and …
The appellants, Krishna Mukhiya and Ramawatar Mukhiya, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge‑VII‑cum‑Special Judge, POCSO, Madhubani, for rape and related offences under Sections 376(D), 326, 324, 201/511 read with Section 34 of the IPC, receiving a 20‑year rigorous imprisonment term. They …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Mandal, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the POCSO Act and the IT Act, alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner abducted the informant's minor daughter and …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged with kidnapping, alleged forced marriage, and sexual offences under sections 363, 366A, 504, 376, 34 of the IPC and sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, abducted the minor daughter of an informant and forced …
The petitioner, Ravindra Ram, was implicated in a case alleging theft of Rs.50,000 and jewellery and the alleged sexual offence under the POCSO Act involving a 17‑year‑old girl. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the girl was his consensual partner and that they had …
Petitioners Rishabh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 17 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioner, Aman Nigan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 212/2023) in Crime No.91 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 506, 354, 354(Gh), 354(Gha) of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. No …
The applicant Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a POCSO case alleging offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 506, 376 and POCSO sections 6/8. The applicant asserted that he had married the victim in 2017, that two …
The applicant, Ram Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceeding and summoning order dated 5 January 2026 in a POCSO case (Mahesh Chandra v. Ram Kumar) pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Special Judge (POCSO), Farrukhabad. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Hasim @ Raja Babu, who was arrested in a case of alleged sexual assault on a four‑year‑old girl under Sections 9M and 10 of the Protection of Children from …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nadeem, accused in a criminal case under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged that the victim, a 17‑year‑old who was pregnant, had consented to the relationship and was willing to marry him, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Chintu @ Brajesh Kumar, who was charged under IPC sections 87, 61(2), 137(2), 64(1) and POCSO Act sections 5(j)(2) and 6 for allegedly enticing the informant’s 17‑year‑old niece, resulting in pregnancy. The applicant argued that he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sanjay Kumar Pandey, who was in custody for alleged offences under IPC sections 377, 504, 506 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act involving a child victim. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul, who is charged with offences under Sections 304, 308, 452, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of a POCSO case (Special Case No. 900 of 2025) pending before the Special Judge, Kasganj. After hearing, the applicants' counsel indicated that they no longer …
The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 144 of 2025 pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under the Protection of Children from …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 122 of 2025) arising under Section 74 of the same Act and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 893 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 506 and 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 693 of 2021) arising from offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. After hearing, the applicants indicated they no longer wished to pursue …
The applicant, Ashok, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1917 of 2020) arising from alleged offences under Sections 354, 354‑B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 04‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑10‑2024 in a POCSO case (Sections 363, 366, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act). They claimed they were …
The applicant, Ashok Dangi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1232 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 354-A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. After hearing, …
The petitioner, Shivaji Pandit, was charged under IPC Sections 365 and 366A and Section 8 of the POCSO Act for alleged kidnapping and forced marriage of a minor. He applied for bail, having been in judicial custody since 22 September 2024. The High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, citing the …
Anil Kumar, a 23‑year‑old male, was charged under Section 65(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for allegedly raping the minor daughter of the informant. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court. The court …
The petitioner, Deepu Kumar, was charged under Section 376(G) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a minor. He has been in custody since 22 April 2023, and the trial is reportedly near completion with only a medical expert yet to be examined. The …
The petitioners, two sisters from Gaya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Civil Line PS‑282/2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 354‑B, 506 and 509, IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d) and POCSO Act section 14(1). The FIR alleged that their brother Anuraj used their mobile phones …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 354(c), 354(b), 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he and another person clicked an inappropriate picture of a minor and threatened to make it viral. He …
The State of Gujarat appealed against the sentence imposed on Ranjit @Rajver Jilubhai Gida for offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 114 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 11, seeking enhancement under Section 418 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The trial court had sentenced the …
Arjun Paswan was accused of attempting to rape a woman, with charges under IPC sections 376, 511, 323, 504 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a retaliatory false complaint, a one‑month delay in filing the FIR, and clean antecedents. The State …
Petitioner Pradeep Kumar Mishra applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Bahera PS Case No. 442/2025) alleging attempted sexual assault, assault, and theft under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act. The petitioner …
Vinod Yadav was arrested on 13 June 2024 in connection with a case alleging that he raped his nine‑year‑old daughter, offences punishable under Section 376(AB) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 376 and 504 of the IPC, Sections 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleges that he committed rape, while the petitioner contends he is innocent, asserting that he is married to …
Vikesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident, and the petitioner claimed false implication. The victim’s statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. …
Julmi Yadav was arrested on 5 October 2025 in connection with a FIR alleging that he, along with others, raped a girl aged about 16‑17 years and threatened her. The petitioner sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the allegations were fabricated. The State opposed bail, relying on the …
Mukul Yadav was arrested in connection with a case (Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 426 of 2025) alleging that he and a co‑accused molested a school‑going girl, attempted to abduct her, and verbally abused the victim’s family using caste slurs. The charges span offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the …
Anant Kumar Ram, a worker at a home for mentally and physically disabled children, was charged under Sections 120B, 201, 323, 342, 377 of the IPC, Sections 6, 9, 10 and 17 of the POCSO Act and Sections 75, 82 and 85 of the Juvenile Justice Act for alleged abuse and failure to forward complaints of …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR or in the victim's statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., and that the …
Mukesh Kumar was charged under IPC sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and section 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a student after threatening to circulate an objectionable video. He has been in custody since September 18, 2023, and his earlier bail plea was rejected. He …
Shyambabu Das was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, charged under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 8 December 2023 and earlier bail applications were rejected. The …
Petitioner Md. Mukhtar Ansari applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 142/2024) alleging rape of a 13‑year‑old girl and other offences under IPC sections 376, 323, 342, 504, 506, 34 and POCSO Act section 4. The prosecution claims the petitioner raped the informant’s minor …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was named in an FIR alleging his participation in the kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old girl and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Information Technology Act and the POCSO Act. The informant claimed the girl was abducted twice, photographed and threatened …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Bela P.S. Case No. 113 of 2020) alleging kidnapping of a minor under IPC sections 365, 366, 366A and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant’s …
The petitioner, Raman Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 377(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged kidnapping of a minor. He pleaded innocence, asserting that the victim had left her house voluntarily and that he has a …
The petitioner, Santu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving a minor, alleged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. He had been in custody since 28 September 2025 and claimed innocence, asserting that the …
The petitioner, Amalesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and rape case (PS Muffasil Case No. 127/2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 366A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner and co‑accused abducted the …
Avinash Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Kalyanpur PS Case No. 333 of 2023) under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the IPC. He applied for regular bail, asserting his innocence, a clean antecedent, and pointing out that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The State opposed the bail, contending that a Section 82 investigation under the Criminal Procedure Code had already been initiated against the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 53 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366-A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as a pending order of …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ramnaresh, who is charged under Sections 363, 376AB, 307 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences against a six‑year‑old child. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of any witness examination, absence of …
Mahendra applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 352, 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant failed to appear before the court on multiple dates after filing the bail application on 16 May 2025. The court observed that such non‑appearance …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitu Raikwar and Viru Raikwar, accused in Crime No. 145 of 2025 under several IPC sections and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicants, who have been in custody since 29 March 2025 and have no prior criminal record, argued …
The applicant, Faheem, filed a bail application in Special Session Trial No.1309 of 2024 concerning offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC indicated consent, and the …
Arpit Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 87, 65(1), 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 19‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicating she had travelled with the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Gurjar, who was charged under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping), 376 (rape), 328 (extortion) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, …
The applicant, Haridev, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the facts, including a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and the victim's …
The applicant, Akhilesh Vishwakarma, sought bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she had voluntarily accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru …
Mohan alias Munna was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five months after the alleged incident and the charge‑sheet under Section …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Gulfam in a criminal case under Section 64(1) of the Bail and Security Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Bail and Security Act suggested consent, and the victim was said to be about 18 …
The applicant, Chandbabu, was charged under IPC sections 65(2), 333, 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 5(n)/6 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old child and committing buccal coitus on 13 March 2025. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, there was no medical evidence, …
The applicant, Anil Barar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.655 of 2016, which alleged offences of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He asserted that he married the victim in …
Rohit Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.55 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, that the alleged …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Alok Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving IPC offences (452, 354-B, 427, 506, 120-B) and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pranshu Urf Priyanshu, who is charged under Sections 363, 366, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences committed in Gajraula, Amroha. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had recorded a statement under Section 183 …
The applicant, Ajay Tiwari, was charged in Sessions Trial No.358 of 2025 for offences under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, arising from an alleged sexual act with a 16‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 BNSS indicated that …
Mannu @ Monu Harijan applied for bail in a case registered as Crime No.680 of 2024, involving charges under Sections 363, 506, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was delayed by four months, and asserted that the alleged …
Vimlesh Kumar, arrested in Crime No.216 of 2024 under IPC sections 70(2), 76, 351(3), 352 and POCSO Act sections 5G/6, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He has been in custody since 1 December 2024 and has no prior criminal record. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Suraj @ Ravi …
The applicant, Neeraj Sharma, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 253 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87, 351(3), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and argued that the alleged victim, a major …
The applicant, Golu alias Gaurav Tamoli, filed a bail application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 64, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshur, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim had consented to the relationship, …
The applicant, Nadeem Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 143 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant had married the victim on 29 January 2024, a fact documented …
The applicant, Gaurav Gautam, was facing trial under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. He and the victim had married on 19 October 2022, had a child, and executed a compromise deed. Both parties, including the victim, admitted the marriage and the …
Yog Sagar, accused under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Sections 3 and 4, had been in jail since July 2023. After a first bail application was rejected, a second application was filed arguing that he is a law‑abiding citizen, has cooperated with the investigation, faces no risk of tampering with …
Javed Ali was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act suggested consent and she refused a medical examination, resulting in no forensic corroboration. The …
The applicant Rahul, charged under Sections 115(2), 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, has been in judicial custody since 21 October 2024. He filed a second bail application, arguing that his prolonged detention of over one and a half years violates his Article 21 …
The applicant, Majhale @ Veeresh, sought bail in a session case involving alleged rape, blackmail, and the circulation of a pornographic video under Sections 376‑D, 34, 506 IPC, Sections 5(G)/6 POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant seized the victim’s …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 213 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under Sections 376, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicants proved that the accused had …
The applicant, Janu @ Ramakant Sharma, was charged with rape, criminal intimidation and offences under the POCSO and IT Acts, alleged to have possessed and helped viral a indecent video of the victim. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, raped the victim and blackmailed …
The applicant Gopal filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 376D IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The petitioner, Sukesh Kumar, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant with the alleged intent of marrying her, invoking offences under IPC Sections 363, 366‑A and 34, and POCSO Act Section 8. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC, asserted that she …
The petitioner, Ram Lakhan Singh, was charged under IPC section 376DA, IT Act section 67, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for allegedly raping a minor and recording a video. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and that he was not named in the FIR, while the State argued that the victim …
Petitioner Radhe Shyam Singh was arrested in a case alleging rape under Section 376(D)(A) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that in three earlier cases against him, police investigations concluded with final reports exonerating him, and that the present case was …
The petitioner, Sheikh Danish, was arrested in connection with a case involving kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor, charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He sought regular bail, claiming false implication, lack of criminal antecedent, and that …
Petitioner Md. Naeem Ahmad sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that he pretended to marry the informant, engaged in physical relations, later refused to …
