Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 15201–15400
An interim application was filed seeking an order restraining Respondent Nos.6 to 8 from taking any coercive steps against Brighton International School, which had intervened in a writ petition. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the school had already been closed down by its …
The Bombay High Court, hearing Writ Petition No. 7366 of 2026, identified clerical errors in the recorded appearances in the judgment dated 31 August 2026. It corrected the appearance of Respondent No. 2’s counsel from “BMC” to “NMC”, and deleted an incorrectly listed counsel for the petitioner. The …
The appellant Sandeep Surendra Anand appealed an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, in a special suit seeking specific performance, declaration, permanent injunction and compensation. By consent, the respondents (Satish Laxminarayan Garg and others) undertook that they would not …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their complaints of unfair labour practices, seeking regularisation and permanency of service with the Nashik District Central Co‑Operative Bank Ltd. The Court examined the precedent set in Shivaji Madhav Jadhav v. …
A group of employees of Nashik District Central Co‑operative Bank filed writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court’s dismissal of their complaints alleging unfair labour practices and seeking permanency. The petitioners argued that their long, continuous service, the bank’s manpower needs, and …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their complaints of unfair labour practices, seeking regularisation and permanency of service with the Nashik District Central Co‑Operative Bank Ltd. The Court examined the precedent set in Shivaji Madhav Jadhav v. …
A group of employees of Nashik District Central Co‑operative Bank filed writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court’s dismissal of their complaints alleging unfair labour practices and seeking permanency. The petitioners argued that their long, continuous service, the bank’s manpower needs, and …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their complaints of unfair labour practices, seeking regularisation and permanency of service with the Nashik District Central Co‑Operative Bank Ltd. The Court examined the precedent set in Shivaji Madhav Jadhav v. …
The petitioners, representing Late K. G. Kataria College, sought a further six‑month continuation of approval for their In‑Charge Principal after the university had granted a new approval period from 12 July 2026 to 11 January 2027. The petitioners highlighted a gap in approval from 12 June 2025 to …
The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …
The appellants/applicants filed two interim applications (Nos. 9616 and 9614 of 2025) seeking a stay of the decree while their second appeals (Nos. 388 and 411 of 2025) were pending. The lower appellate court had already stayed the decree on 15 March 2010. The High Court, after admitting the second …
Shashikala Walmik Kate filed a contempt petition against Pune Municipal Corporation for failing to pay pension arrears as ordered by a Division Bench on 5 December 2024. The earlier order required immediate payment of the arrears with interest. The High Court, noting the breach, directed the …
Vasant Bhaskar Vispute filed a criminal revision application challenging a Family Court order that directed him to pay maintenance to his wife and his 24‑year‑old son. The applicant sought to withdraw the part of the application concerning his wife and argued that his son, being an adult employed …
Petitioner Nitin Murlidhar Upasani filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to restrain the investigating agency from lodging a crime report (FIR) despite a prima facie cognizable offence. The petition relied on orders from a coordinate bench that had restrained the agency, but the respondents …
The applicant, Kuldeep @ Bhola Mukesh Kajaniya, was arrested in May 2023 in connection with FIR No.313 of 2023 for murder and related offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 302 and 307. The prosecution alleged that the accused formed an unlawful assembly and assaulted …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 30 April 2016 of the Lower Appellate Court that set aside a temporary injunction granted by the Trial Court on 28 April 2015, which had restrained the second defendant from carrying out construction on the suit property. The trial court’s injunction had been …
The petitioner, Haushila Prasad Ramasre Dubey, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to execute its own demolition order dated 06‑06‑2017, issued under Sections 260 and 267(1) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, against an …
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited filed Writ Petition No. 7547 of 2026 against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court had earlier dismissed a contempt petition and issued specific directions in the same writ petition. The petitioner informed the Court that the directions had been fully complied with. …
The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …
The applicant, Soniya Sonu Gupta, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. After the charge-sheet was filed, her counsel, Mr. Mridul Das, sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh one before the trial court. The court considered the …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 22 February 2013 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) under the Maharashtra Agricultural (Maharashtra Agricultural Ceiling of Holdings Amendment) Act, 2011, which returned certain land to other holders. They claimed that they also possessed a right, …
The petitioner, Sangita Janardan Kondivilkar, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Deputy Collector (ENC/REM) to hear and determine her eligibility or ineligibility proceedings arising out of Appeal No.12 of 2024 within a specific time frame. The petition also requested a …
The petitioner, Narayan Bhika Baria (deceased) through his lawyer Kishor Narayan Baria, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the Deputy Collector (Enc. and Rem.) Alias Competent Authority, Andheri. No counsel appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called. The Court observed that the …
The applicant, Sabir Husain Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1613 of 2026) along with an interim application (No. 2858 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the Court that the applicant had passed away. The Court considered …
The High Court of Bombay entertained a writ petition filed by Hussain Alimohammed Maknojia against the District Deputy Registrar and a housing society. The petitioner sought a correction to the minutes of the order dated 31 August 2026, specifically to insert the name of Advocate Mr. Shadab Khan who …
The petitioner, Sameer Vithalrao Ghanwat, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his writ petition which had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The petition was originally dismissed on 2 February 2024. The petitioner explained the delay in filing the interim …
The petition filed by Rajendra Vishwanath Patole sought the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve his dispute with Indus Towers Limited. The court observed that there was no contention regarding the existence of an arbitration clause or the notice invoking it. Accordingly, it appointed Mr. Anurag …
ITI Gold Loan Ltd. filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. After hearing, the Court was not inclined to grant the relief sought. The petitioner’s counsel then sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition, which the Court granted. The …
Dilip S. Kapadia filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and the same occurred on the previous date. The Court noted the applicant's failure to prosecute the application. …
The applicant, an 81‑year‑old accused, filed an interim application seeking relaxation of a bail condition that required him to report monthly to the DCB, CID, Unit‑IX, Mumbai. He argued that his advanced age and medical problems made the reporting difficult, though he had not misused bail and was …
M/s. Ruby Builders filed Civil Revision Application (Stamp) No. 17700 of 2024 but delayed its filing by 265 days. The delay was attributed to the applicant's advocate, who failed to inform the client of the dismissal order dated 5 July 2023 and did not provide the certified copy of the order until …
The appellant, Shamshul Ishrar Khan, sought relief in a contempt appeal, arguing that a prior order of the Single Judge in Commercial Arbitration No.19 of 2015, clarified by a later court order dated 15 July 2026, had fully addressed his grievances, rendering further adjudication unnecessary. The …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Section 406 of the IPC for alleged criminal breach of trust involving pledged gold. The complainant claimed she pledged 23‑carat gold for a loan of Rs.9,00,000, which …
The petitioners, JNTL Consumer Health (India) Pvt. Ltd. and an associate, challenged the seizure of their electrolyte drink packaged in tetra packs, valued at approximately Rs. 2.25‑2.5 crore, by the Government of Maharashtra. They sought permission to dispose of the seized stock outside the State …
The petitioners, Imran Salauddin Momin & Ors., were reported as absconding in a criminal case (CR No.365 of 2026) and filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking relief. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that the court should not exercise its discretionary …
The applicant filed an interim application in the High Court of Bombay but showed no interest in prosecuting it. No arguments or evidence were presented by the applicant. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, accordingly, dismissed the interim application. The dismissal was based solely on …
The appellants filed two interim applications seeking a stay of the decree while their second appeals were pending. The lower appellate court had already stayed the decree on 15 March 2010. The High Court admitted both second appeals and ordered that the earlier stay remain in effect throughout the …
The appellants, represented by the heirs of the deceased Gopichand Narsu Dabade, filed a second civil appeal (ST) No. 21393 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel submitted a communication dated 7 May 2026 stating he had no instructions to prosecute the appeal, indicating the appellants …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court, but no representative appeared on his behalf. The respondent, represented by Advocate S. M. Mangaonkar, appeared for Respondent No.2 (the State). The Court examined the petition and found that the petitioner had not prosecuted …
The appellant, Century Laminating Company Ltd., appealed a decision that directed it to pay compensation to the claimants after the driver of the vehicle died and the insurance company contested the claim. The original claim was allowed, and the owner was ordered to pay. In the appeal, the appellant …
The appellant, a sole proprietor, is the defendant in a summary suit for recovery of Rs.35,00,000 plus interest, based on a 2021 Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) where the respondents invested the amount for film production. The trial court granted conditional leave to defend, requiring the …
In an interim application filed in Writ Petition No. 47 of 2014, the applicant sought leave to amend the petition to include a prayer for condonation of delay and to bring the legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner and a deceased respondent on record. The court granted leave to amend and …
Edward William Simpson filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, on his instructions conveyed via email dated 31 August 2026, sought to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive merits of the bail application …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an interim order dated 23 June 2026, wherein the Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mumbai Division, directed the parties to maintain the status quo pending a revision application concerning the petitioner’s request for separate …
The petitioner, Dilip Nana Randive, filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a pension payment order dated 6 December 2023. The High Court had earlier, on 29 July 2026, granted the respondent a last opportunity to purge the contempt. Respondent No.4, through Addl. Govt. Pleader O. A. …
Mohammad Firoj Ajmerali Sayyad filed an interim bail application (Criminal Bail Application No. 4256 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant and the applicant himself was absent. The court noted that the applicant appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The applicant, Nizamuddin Ansari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 64(2)(m), 69, 115(2) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the complainant had a consensual relationship with him based on a false promise of marriage. The complainant, a married …
The applicant, Virendra Laxmidas Thakkar, filed an interim application seeking permission to travel to Portugal and Italy from 20 September to 10 October 2026. The court noted prior orders granting the applicant travel permission to the United States and Germany, and observed that the applicant had …
The petitioner, Supriya Pramod Jaware, filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 11 November 2016 which permanently denied him the benefit of remission because he failed to surrender after being released on furlough and was later arrested for being unauthorised outside for 293 days. …
Sanjay Shivchandra Vishakarma applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a family quarrel over bathroom usage. The FIR, filed by his brother, alleged assault causing injury to the brother’s left hand …
The High Court of Bombay entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Sudhir Jagtap under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case registered for offences under Sections 3(5), 352, 351(2) and 108 of the same Act. The prosecution alleged …
Surekha Hanumant Pawar filed a writ petition (No. 1041 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay challenging an unspecified matter against Shantilal Keshav Darekar. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Sham Thakur, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the …
The High Court considered three writ petitions filed by Alka Suryakant Karale, Bajranglal Richhpal Gupta, and Aziz Esmail Dhariwala challenging the mutation of their lands as ‘Private Forests’ without compliance with Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought redress for …
The petitioners challenged the mutation of their land into "Private Forest" by the Revenue and Forest Department, alleging that the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was not followed. The High Court noted its earlier directions in Writ Petition No.1536 of 2017 and …
The petitioner, Jyoti Kiran Kalyankar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15‑04‑2026 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Pune, which disposed of an interim application in a pending securitisation case. The High Court held that the petitioner has an alternative efficacious statutory remedy …
The applicant, Farhan @ Bablu Abdul Karim Shaikh, was arrested as Accused No.5 in a case alleging that he arranged fake sureties for filing bail bonds, alongside other accused who are advocates. The prosecution alleged that he facilitated sureties on four occasions and seized multiple Aadhaar and …
The petitioner sought recall of a 2 April 2024 order that quashed an FIR dated 6 December 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a property transaction. The FIR was filed by the complainant after a failed sale of a bungalow, …
Akshay Gajanan Kadam filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel sought permission to withdraw that application and to file a fresh bail application before the trial court, citing the filing of a charge-sheet and other new grounds. The Court considered whether it could grant …
The petitioners sought modification of an earlier order passed by this Court while a suit was pending, but the City Civil Court declined to vary that order. They contended that they possessed a statutory right of appeal under Order XLIII Rule 7(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court …
The applicant, Kanha Sudarsana Parida, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Ms. Krishma Joshi, sought leave to withdraw that application and to file a fresh bail petition before the Sessions Court on new grounds. The Court examined whether it could permit such …
The appellant, Valuable Property Private Limited, filed an appeal against Order No. 930 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court. The appellant, through counsel Mr. Archit Rao, sought to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No objections were raised by the respondents. The …
The appellant, Valuable Property Private Limited, filed an appeal against Order No. 930 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court. The appellant, through counsel Mr. Archit Rao, sought to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No objections were raised by the respondents. The …
M/s. Jalasai Developers filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of deemed conveyance. The petitioners, through senior counsel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition and instead pursue a suit against the order. The Court considered whether a petition …
The applicant, Pandurang Shantaram Dafal, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case alleging assault, grievous hurt and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the …
Mukund Chandram Bhambar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 and 34, and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The applicant …
The petitioner, Sanjay Nagari SRA Sahakari Gruha Nirman Sanstha, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) after the SRA terminated the appointment of a developer under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) …
The applicant, Jayant Lunawat, filed a civil revision application against Pune Municipal Corporation. The applicant's counsel, Rahul Agrawal, sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the revision application …
The petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sikar, which was transferred by post to the Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. The original complaint papers were subsequently lost or misplaced, prompting …
The Rajyog Heights Co‑operative Housing Society resolved to demolish its 1987 building and appointed Jag Builds Realty Pvt Ltd to redevelop the premises. Four society members (Defendants 1‑4) obstructed the work, prompting the plaintiff to sue for a declaration that the society’s resolutions are …
Akshay Kishan Sonawane applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR (C.R. No.199 of 2026) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was not involved in the …
Kuldeep Ramesh Kshirsagar filed Writ Petition No.15330 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court challenging certain aspects of the order dated 31st August 2026. An interim application was filed seeking correction of a typographical error in that order. The Court examined whether the reference to …
The High Court considered an interim application filed by Kuldeep Ramesh Kshirsagar in Writ Petition No. 11447 of 2025 against the Union of India and others. The petitioner sought leave to amend the petition to implead the Goods and Services Tax (GST) as a party and requested condonation of a 75‑day …
The applicant, Deepak Gobri Yadav, was arrested as Accused No.3 in a POCSO case and was previously granted bail on 19 January 2026 with conditions. He failed to appear before the trial court on 3 June 2026 due to a delayed train, leading to a non‑bailable warrant and the trial court’s refusal to …
The petitioner, Nikita Nimesh Shah, filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order dated 14‑02‑2025 in which a Special Court took ex‑parte cognizance and issued process against her and 14 …
Kishor Nana Kini filed an interim application seeking recall of the Registrar Judicial‑I's order dated 08.05.2026 which refused registration of his writ petition on the ground of unremoved office objections, and also prayed for condonation of delay in moving the restoration application. The Court …
The applicants, Lakhan Lalchand Dhamwani and another, were charged under Section 85(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for allegedly shouting loudly at each other while intoxicated, alleged to breach public peace. The prosecution’s case did not allege any third‑party disturbance or any element of …
The applicant, Ganesh Sahebrao Rahate, was charged with murder and related offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of a man on 21 December 2023. The prosecution relied on CCTV footage showing the applicant and co‑accused entering the victim’s house, carrying …
M/s SVS Aqua Technologies LLP filed a writ petition challenging a GST audit conducted under Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, alleging that the department had proceeded to recover tax without a prior adjudication under Sections 73 or 74. The petitioner argued that such …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Garg, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking to quash an order dated 28‑04‑2025 of the Special Court at Greater Sessions, Mumbai, which had taken cognizance of a …
Shivshankar Jagannath Mourya was charged under multiple IPC offences and the Maharashtra Depositors Protection Act for promising high Bitcoin returns. The complainant, a tax consultant, claimed to have received the full amount back via online transfer and later affirmed no further complaint. The …
The applicant, Sushant Baban Dongre, filed Criminal Revision Application No. 485 of 2024 against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel, N.N. Gawankar and Manas N. Gawankar, sought leave to withdraw the revision application. The respondent State, represented by S.M. Mangaonkar, opposed …
The applicant, Suresh Uttam Kale, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for alleged offences under IPC Section 395 and Indian Railways Act Section 174 relating to a robbery in 2018. He was arrested in 2025 based primarily on confessional statements of four …
The applicant, Tatyaram Waman Sangale, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No. 181/2026) alleging offences under Sections 109, 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged …
Platinum Aashiana LLP filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai Suburban, which had deferred hearing and decision on an application questioning the Commission’s pecuniary jurisdiction until the final adjudication of the …
The petitioner, Sandip Machindra Patil, complained in 2017 of an alleged illegal construction by a respondent on land in Village Dawdi, Thane. He filed a writ petition seeking relief, and the Division Bench allowed him to make a representation to the Municipal Commissioner of Kalyan-Dombivli …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Minal Omkar Sakpal, a 30‑year‑old mother of three minor children, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging the sale of her 40‑day‑old daughter. The prosecution alleged that the applicant and her husband attempted to sell the …
The appellants, Vinamra Builders and Developers, appealed a decree for specific performance that required them to hand over possession of flat No.202 and to receive the balance consideration deposited by the plaintiff. The parties attempted an amicable settlement, including offering another flat, …
The appellants, Vinamra Builders and Developers, appealed a decree for specific performance that required them to hand over possession of flat No.202 and to receive the balance consideration deposited by the plaintiff. The parties attempted an amicable settlement, including offering another flat, …
The petitioner, Swadeshi Civil Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the attachment of its bank account that was effected before it received notice of the adjudicating officer's order. The petitioner argued that the attachment was coercive and that it had a right to appeal the …
Sufiyan Abdul Manan Khan was arrested in February 2024 for possession of 2.140 kg of charas and charged under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. After more than 2.5 years in custody, he filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, …
The petitioners challenged a notification under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955 for acquisition of their lands, having already filed objections under Section 17(1) which were pending before the Land Acquisition Officer. They filed an interim application alleging that the statutory …
Deepak Mohan Phad filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, which was opposed by the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Mr. Priyal G. Sarda and the State by Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton. The Court observed that the applicant had already secured bail, rendering the present …
Mohd Musum Sameed Ansari filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court expressed disinclination to entertain the application, after which the applicant's counsel sought time for instructions. Upon a second hearing, the counsel requested and was permitted to withdraw the bail …
The High Court considered three writ petitions filed by Alka Suryakant Karale, Bajranglal Richhpal Gupta, and Aziz Esmail Dhariwala challenging the mutation of their lands as ‘Private Forests’ without compliance with Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought redress for …
The Bombay High Court considered the bail application of Shubham Balasaheb Takale, a 25‑year‑old accused charged with multiple offences under the IPC, who had been in custody for five years and three months with only three of thirty‑five witnesses examined. The Court examined the constitutional …
The applicant, Amit Ajit Agarwal, was charged in C.R. No.67 of 2026 with offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 318(3), 336(1), 338, 339, 340(1)(2)) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (sections 329(1)(3)(4), 61(A), (B), (35)) relating to cheating, fabrication and wrongful confinement. The …
The petitioners, members of a joint venture, challenged a Tahsildar's order imposing a penalty under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for allegedly extracting 5,651.47 brass of loose soil from a construction site. They argued that the extracted soil was largely re‑levelled on …
The applicant, Komal Duryodhan Mindhe, sought bail after a prior bail application was dismissed on 02.02.2026 with a direction to re‑apply after six months. The applicant’s counsel argued that the earlier order was not specific and that the fresh application could be filed before the High Court. The …
Shailaja Girish Gaste, an authorised officer of Cielo Co‑operative Housing Society, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 20 July 2026 sent by the District Special Auditor to the Senior Police Inspector, which sought criminal action based on an audit report under Section 81 of the …
The petitioner, Nupur Prashant Surve, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 30 June 2026 of the Scrutiny Committee that rejected her claim to a Thakur Schedule Tribe certificate. She relied on a caste validity certificate previously granted to her father by the same Committee, …
The petitioners, Smt. Lataben Sureshing Rana and another, challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Maval‑Mulshi, under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. The notice sought restoration of land that the petitioners had purchased on 10 March …
The petitioners, legal heirs of the late Shree Arun Dhavaji Mate, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel Mr. Saurabh Vivek Patil, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioners filed Interim Application No. 6753 seeking to substitute the deceased respondent No. 3 with her legal representatives after her death on 23‑06‑2026, and the court allowed this substitution, directing that the amendment be made within a week and notice be issued to respondents No. …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 8 June 2026 passed by the Tahsildar under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906, by filing a revision before the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO), Pune. The SDO refused to entertain the revision, holding that the petitioners were not parties to the …
The applicants were charged under IPC sections 406, 420 read with 34 for a commercial mineral supply dispute. The parties later reconciled, returned the disputed amount and filed consent terms seeking to quash the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC and the corresponding Section 528 of the Bharatiya …
The applicants, Kailash Ketan Das and another, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 860 of 2026 for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act, 2016, arising from a police raid on Samudra Bar where women were …
The petitioners, Chaitanya Harinath Dhube and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of ICICI Bank Limited. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi, sought to withdraw the petition in view of subsequent events. The …
Shweta Abhay Singh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. She later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application, requesting liberty to file a statutory appeal if needed. The learned counsel for the applicant made the request, and the State of Maharashtra …
The appellant, Nilesh Dinkar Dhoke, was convicted under Sections 302, 427 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence and release on bail, relying on earlier bail orders granted to his co‑accused, Pallavi Nilesh Dhoke and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer (Appellate Authority) to hear their application for a stay of Tenancy Appeal No.267/2026, which challenges a Tahsildar’s order declaring the respondents as deemed purchasers of suit lands. The petitioners alleged …
The petitioner, Manoj Siddhappareddy Damodar Rao, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. After the Supreme Court decided the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798), the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. …
The High Court of Bombay, on suo moto basis, noted clerical errors in an earlier order dated 31 August 2026. The errors pertained to the numbering of an interim application and the listing of counsel appearing for the appellant. The court directed that Interim Application No.11988/2024 be corrected …
The High Court of Bombay, on suo moto basis, noted clerical errors in an earlier order dated 31 August 2026. The errors pertained to the numbering of an interim application and the listing of counsel appearing for the appellant. The court directed that Interim Application No.11988/2024 be corrected …
Prem Sudhakar Gangurde filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the Supreme Court decided the related case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra, the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. …
The applicant, Razak Habib Rehman Qureshi, filed a third anticipatory bail application, which the State objected to on the ground that successive bail applications are not maintainable under the Supreme Court decision in G.R. Ananda Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu. The State also contended that the …
Petitioner Prashant Parsurampuria filed Writ Petition No.11403 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Karl Tamboly, on behalf of the petitioner, sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, allowed the withdrawal. …
Saddam Paigamber Chamnoor applied for anticipatory bail, but the State of Maharashtra pointed out that the application failed to disclose details of six alleged offences. The applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the application and file a fresh one with complete particulars, while also agreeing to …
The applicant, Rafique Dawood Kamdar, filed an interim application seeking to amend his writ petition (No. 4102 of 2026) by adding additional grounds. The petition concerns a matter of preventive detention. The High Court was asked to consider whether the amendment should be permitted. The Court, …
The petitioner, Mahipal Sham Chavan, filed a writ petition challenging his detention. The respondent State filed an affidavit stating that the detention order and supporting documents were served on the detainee, and included the detainee's signed acknowledgment. On this basis, the petitioner's …
The petitioners Bhaskarrao Govindrao Gaikwak and others filed interim applications (ST Nos. 24809 and 24791 of 2026) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applications sought relief as outlined in prayer clauses ‘a’ and ‘b’. The Court examined the reasons set out in the applications and …
Petitioner Pooja Yellapa Koli filed a writ petition (ST) No. 14290 of 2026. The Registrar rejected the petition on 6 August 2026 for failure to remove office objections within two weeks, and the petition was formally dismissed on 20 August 2026. The petitioner filed an interim application alleging …
The applicant, Ramesh Babulal Parmar, was arrested on 30 August 2026 and had filed an anticipatory bail application. He later approached the court seeking to withdraw that application. The court considered whether the applicant could withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. It held that the …
The petitioners challenged the mutation of their lands as 'Private Forests' by the Revenue and Forest Department, alleging that the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was not followed. They sought relief directing the authorities to reconsider the mutation and to …
The petitioners challenged the mutation of their lands as 'Private Forests' by the Revenue and Forest Department, alleging that the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was not followed. They sought relief directing the authorities to reconsider the mutation and to …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application but failed to disclose their criminal antecedents in the supporting affidavit. The learned appellate court, referencing the Supreme Court decision in Zeba Khan v. State of U.P. (2026 SCC online SC 188), noted the omission and directed the …
Ghanshyam @ Sunny @ Sonu Amarlal Chugh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The Court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant the relief. Counsel for the applicant then sought leave to withdraw the application. The Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, …
The applicant, Imran Akil Sayyad, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant on the scheduled date, nor on the previous date. The respondent, represented by Mr. S. S. Pednekar, was present. The Court observed the …
The petitioners, Ganesh Shankar Dimble and others, objected under Section 17 of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955 to a notification issued under Section 15 proposing acquisition of their lands. Their objections are pending before the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO). They filed an interim application …
The petitioners, Alkyl Amines Chemicals Limited, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Individual workers, whose interests were previously represented by a union before the Minister, filed an interim application seeking to intervene in the petition on their own …
The petitioner, a retired pharmacist who served for 30 years, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the respondents to decide his representation requesting exemption from the mandatory Marathi Language Examination, which was raised belatedly after his superannuation. The petitioner claimed …
The F.N. Social Education Medical Charities Trust challenged the Pune Municipal Corporation’s (PMC) permission granted to Goel Ganga India Pvt. Ltd. to develop a property it claimed was gifted to the Trust, alleging the developer obtained the land through a forged will. The Supreme Court (referred …
The petitioners challenged a 2015 order that revised the market value of a 17‑plot property from Rs 12 crore (as adjudicated by the Collector of Stamps in 2007) to Rs 52.61 crore, thereby demanding a deficit stamp duty of Rs 2.03 crore. The Court examined whether the revised valuation reflected the …
The petitioners, senior faculty members at a fully aided Ayurvedic college, challenged an order dated 13 September 2021 that withdrew three non‑compounded advanced salary increments granted to them under a 2011 Government Resolution and directed recovery of the amounts. The increments had been paid …
The applicants, Deepak Salve and others, were charged in a special case for allegedly assaulting a minor and using obscene language, based on the testimony of the minor and the first informant. The prosecution alleged that a co-accused slapped the minor and that the applicants attempted to assault …
The petitioner, Rashid Khan Pathan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nilesh Ojha, informed the Court that his client had instructed him not to pursue the petition. Counsel for Respondent No.1, Mr. Mandar Limaye, and the learned …
The applicant, Deepak Gautam Pandey, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. Consequently, he approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel …
The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Pandhare, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on two occasions. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were …
The petitioners challenged a 2015 order that revised the market value of a 17‑plot property from Rs 12 crore (as adjudicated by the Collector of Stamps in 2007) to Rs 52.61 crore, thereby demanding a deficit stamp duty of Rs 2.03 crore. The Court examined whether the revised valuation reflected the …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition on 22 November 2019 seeking a writ of habeas corpus after her daughter had committed suicide on 30 March 2019. The petitioner claimed she was unaware of her daughter's death at the time of filing. The respondent produced the order of the Additional Chief …
Sharafat Abdul Hamid Solkar filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, later sought leave to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. Finding no objection and …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Gupta, filed an interim application seeking to withdraw that application and instead file a proper writ petition challenging the Union of India and others. The learned counsel argued that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the interim relief and desired to start …
Ganesh Vasant Chavan filed a discharge application which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, on the basis that there was sufficient material to frame charges under Sections 7, 7A and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, although the charge sheet only covered Sections 7A and …
The applicant sought condonation of a 179‑day delay in filing an application for leave to appeal against an acquittal dated 31 August 2017, which involved charges under Sections 120‑B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Respondent …
The petitioner, Snehal Chandrashekar Jangde, filed a writ petition challenging the Family Court's order dated 10 April 2025 that rejected her application for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner claimed a modest income of ₹4,000 per month and expenses of …
The applicants, Minakshi Nilesh Singh and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust (Sections 406, 420, 34 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023) and violations …
The High Court of Bombay heard a bail application filed by Vijay Anant Brahmanwade. The court was not inclined to grant bail, and the applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application and requested that the trial court complete the trial within nine months, with liberty to file a …
Bharat Vishnu Sonawale filed First Appeal No. 1638 of 2024 which was dismissed on 3 April 2025 for non‑prosecution because his counsel failed to appear, citing inadvertence. He moved an interim application (No. 38307 of 2025) seeking restoration of the appeal, arguing that the default was accidental …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Court and did not ensure that the petition was served on the State as required. The learned Additional Government Pleader raised a grievance regarding non‑service of the petition on the State. The Court observed that the petitioners had lost interest in …
Joseph Lancerio Jesus Miranda filed a writ petition challenging the handling of a pension nomination in favour of his son by the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, including the School Education Department and a third respondent, argued that the nomination should be processed and forwarded to …
The petitioners, a developer, were charged under IPC sections 409, 420, 464 and 34 following a complaint by a society member regarding a redevelopment project. The parties later settled their private dispute and filed a consent petition under Sections 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 528 of …
The petitioners, accused in a redevelopment dispute, sought quashing of FIR No. 1036/2024 and a chargesheet under IPC sections 409, 420, 464 and 34, invoking consent settlement dated 07.05.2026. The parties had resolved their differences through a consent affidavit filed on 29.08.2026, and the High …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 January 2021 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but failed to take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The petitioner's advocate, Ms. Shell, informed the court that she could no longer assist because the brief had been returned to the …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 19‑day delay in filing an appeal against Order (Stamp) No.485 of 2026. The respondents raised only oral opposition and did not contest the established Supreme Court principles on condonation of delay. The court examined the memo and …
The petition was filed on 11 January 2021 by Akbar Majid Khan seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
Three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 476, 477 and 478 of 2026) were filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0361 of 2025 on the ground of consent quashing. The original complainant, Avinash Amaldar Singh, filed affidavits stating his free …
Three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 476, 477 and 478 of 2026) were filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0361 of 2025 on the ground of consent quashing. The original complainant, Avinash Amaldar Singh, filed affidavits stating his free …
Three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 476, 477 and 478 of 2026) were filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0361 of 2025 on the ground of consent quashing. The original complainant, Avinash Amaldar Singh, filed affidavits stating his free …
Shriprakash G. Singh filed Writ Petition No. 409 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was filed in the criminal appellate jurisdiction. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, appearing on behalf of Maharashtra Law …
The petitioners, Snehal Jitendra Pandey & Ors., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. Their counsel, Adv. Ashok Kumar Dubey, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as …
The petitioner, Malliga Muthu, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after 14 December 2021, neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The record indicated a lack of interest on the part of the …
The petitioner, Salman Salim Sayyed, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. After the hearing date of 5th March 2021, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the …
The petitioners, Pragati Pre Fab India Private Limited & Ors., filed writ petitions No. 274 and 280 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The court observed that after March 17, 2021, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate …
An interim application was filed seeking restoration of Second Appeal No. 718 of 1995 after a delay of nearly two years in filing. The respondent opposed the application but left the decision to the court. The High Court, noting the lengthy delay but wishing to give the appellant a chance to …
The applicant, Bablu Raghuveersingh Yadav, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The court had previously heard the matter on 10 August 2026 and directed the applicant's counsel to appear on the next date. On 25 August 2026, the counsel failed to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 29 January 2021 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioners or their advocates appeared for any hearing thereafter, and the record shows they made no effort to circulate or advance the petition. The court observed …
The petitioner, Rashid Ghulam Murtuza, filed a writ petition on 1 February 2021 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 29 August 2026. The court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition …
The petitioner, Jaywant Laxman Rakshe, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after August 13, 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
Petitioners Poonam Vijay Matte et al. and Ram Ramdas Samudre filed writ petitions under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR/MECR proceedings relating to alleged extortion, forgery and criminal intimidation. The parties had settled their private dispute, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel Mr. Clive D’souza, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioners could be …
M/s. Martha Corporation filed a writ petition seeking the release of five imported refurbished ventilators that had been confiscated under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the quashing of the confiscation order. The petitioner argued that the ventilators have a useful life of six to …
The petitioner, Ramesh Mohanlal Vyas, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking consent quashing of a 1996 FIR, supported by consent affidavits of the complainant and two injured victims. The trial court had already acquitted three other accused, and there was confusion regarding the …
The petitioner, Yakub Yusuf Shaikh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel later applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Devidasrao More and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear when called. The court record shows that after 25 …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 17 February 2021 but failed to appear for any hearing. The court noted that the petitioners and their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. It was observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Updesh Harkisandas Khanna, sought accommodation due to the bereavement of a close relative of his counsel. The court, upon the petitioner's request, ordered that the matter be stood over to 15 September 2026 and listed for directions. No substantive issues of law were addressed. The …
The petitioner, Asha Vijay Bhat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel later applied for unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2021 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges dismissed the petition on the ground of …
The petitioner, Tanzila Imran Khan, filed a writ petition on 23 February 2021 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at the hearing on 29 August 2026. The court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to circulate the petition since its filing, …
The petitioners, an educational trust and some of its trustees, challenged a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner allowing the transfer of management of Dnyanganga Madhyamik Vidyalaya to another trust. They alleged that the transfer was based on a forged …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 16 February 2021. The High Court examined the applicability of a recent Supreme Court decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra (2026 …
Finquest Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd., through its counsel, sought leave to unconditionally withdraw its writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court. The petitioners' counsel applied for the withdrawal, and the Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as …
The petitioner, Akhil Anil Chitre, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after March 3, 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not …
The petition arose from a civil land dispute that was settled by the parties, who filed an affidavit of consent and executed release and conveyance deeds. The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 83 of 2023 (sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC) under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and …
The petitioner, Lahu Chandu Chavan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
Sunil Mangilal Jain filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after February 1, 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the …
The Applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No.44/2010 and the accompanying charge‑sheet for offences under the IPC and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The parties had settled the underlying …
Miss Pushpalata (Lata Laxman) filed a claim that was dismissed by the trial court. She appealed the dismissal, but no counsel appeared on her behalf at the hearing on 18 August 2026. The Court noted the appellant's failure to prosecute the appeal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for …
The appellants, a partnership firm and its partners, sued the respondent for unpaid amounts for urea and DAP supplied between 1987 and 1991, seeking Rs.16,57,250.50 plus interest. The respondent filed a counter‑claim of Rs.40,19,854 alleging breach of contract for not supplying the fertilizers in …
Three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 476, 477 and 478 of 2026) were filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0361 of 2025 on the ground of consent quashing. The original complainant, Avinash Amaldar Singh, filed affidavits stating his free …
In Criminal Appeal No. 127 of 2020, the appellant Virendra Laxmidas Thakkar filed Interim Application No. 988 of 2026 seeking certain relief. The appellant later moved the court to withdraw that interim application, contending that the prayer no longer survived. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioners purchased three auctioned units, including unit 1A, and sought membership in a co‑operative society. The Deputy Registrar, invoking Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, ordered the society to grant membership for unit 1A, which the society complied with. …
Three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 476, 477 and 478 of 2026) were filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0361 of 2025 on the ground of consent quashing. The original complainant, Avinash Amaldar Singh, filed affidavits stating his free …
Three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 476, 477 and 478 of 2026) were filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0361 of 2025 on the ground of consent quashing. The original complainant, Avinash Amaldar Singh, filed affidavits stating his free …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No.1114 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, evidenced by a Consent …
The petitioners, Bharat Bhagwan Sonavane and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and, after February 22, 2021, did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed …
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 5,00,000 compensation to the legal representatives of the deceased Rajesh Tukaram Masurkar, finding the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay liable for the accident involving a kinetic scooter and a dumper on a flyover. The corporation appealed, …
The petitioners, Sarita Kishor Parikh and another, filed writ petitions (Nos. 277 and 278 of 2021) challenging actions of the Commissioner of Police, Thane. No petitioners appeared when called for hearing, and the court record shows that after January 6, 2021, neither the petitioners nor their …
Petitioners Kapil Wadhawan & Anr filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Central Bureau of Investigation. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, exercising its inherent …
The petitioner, Amadi Abdurab Mulla, challenged a District Judge's order dismissing an appeal against a trial court's refusal to grant a status‑quo order during the pendency of a suit. The High Court examined whether it could entertain the writ petition under its supervisory jurisdiction under …
