Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 15401–15600

M/S WALIA AGNI METAL PVT. LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, M/s Walia Agni Metal Pvt. Ltd., was implicated in FIR No.44 of 2021 for cheating and breach of trust concerning a land transaction. The parties later settled the dispute through a deed of compromise filed in a commercial suit, and the petitioner sought quashing of the FIR under …

BHARATH PRAVEEN CHAND DARAM @ BHARAT RAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 0194/2024 filed for offences under Sections 420 read with 34 of the IPC. The parties had settled the underlying civil dispute, with the complainant receiving Rs.3,61,000, and both sought …

SANTOSH PANDHARINATH DIVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Santosh Pandharinath Dive filed a writ petition on 29 October 2020 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner …

UDAY GANPATRAO BADADAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Uday Ganpatrao Badadare, filed a writ petition on 29 October 2020 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …

PRIYANKA DEEPAK BIRARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Priyanka Deepak Birari, filed a writ petition on 31 October 2020 in the Bombay High Court. She failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The Court …

BHIKAN VISHVANATH BIRARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Bhikan Vishvanath Birari, filed a writ petition on 31 October 2020 challenging the State of Maharashtra and others. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to circulate the petition since its …

SAEEDMIYA ALIMIYA SAYYEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 3 November 2020 but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …

ARIF ISMAIL KADIWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Arif Ismail Kadiwal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after August 10, 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing …

SUNIL MANGILAL JAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Sunil Mangilal Jain filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after February 1, 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the …

SMT. JYOTIBEN VIRJI SHAHversusM/S NAVIN DEVELOPMENTS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Swapnil Jyotiben Virji Shah, filed a writ petition after the main suit against M/s Navin Developments was dismissed in default, rendering the writ petition ineffective. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition while retaining the right to challenge the …

VILAS SURYAKANT MAYEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Vilas Suryakant Mayekar, filed a writ petition on 11 November 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the …

VILAS SURYAKANT MAYEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Vilas Suryakant Mayekar filed Writ Petition No. 1203 of 2021 on 11 November 2020 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the scheduled hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after …

THE LIQUOR GARAGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, The Liquor Garage, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel applied for unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …

THE BREAK ROOM THROUGH MANAGERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The Break Room, through its manager, filed a writ petition (No. 1212 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …

CAFE HOLY THROUGH OWNERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

Cafe Holy filed Writ Petition No. 1196 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as …

WALKESHWAR TRIVENI CO OP HSG SOC LTDversusHIMANSHU ASHOK DOSHI AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court examined a writ petition filed by Walkeshwar Triveni CHS Ltd. challenging orders of the Co-operative Court that mandated the Society to produce an exhaustive list of documents demanded by Respondent No.1. The Court observed that the Co-operative Court had not examined the …

VILAS SURYANKANT MAYEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Vilas Suryankant Mayekar, filed a writ petition on 12 November 2020 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …

SHAHIDA F. BANDALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Shahida F. Bandali, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after March 12, 2021, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …

RAJESH J. PATELversusDISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (2) AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Deputy Registrar, Co‑operative Societies‑II, which dismissed his revision application on the basis that full payment of Rs.26,02,415/- signified acceptance of liability. The petitioner contended that the amount was deposited …

LAXMI J. PATELversusDISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (2) AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 26 June 2025 of the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies-II, which dismissed Revision Application No. 299/2025 on the ground that the petitioner’s full payment indicated acceptance of liability. The petitioner contended …

GARIB NAGAR RAHIWASI WELFER SANGH SOCIETYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

Garib Nagar Rahiwasi Welfare Sangh Society filed Writ Petition No. 201 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. An interim application (No. 1087 of 2021) was also filed in the same proceedings. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought unconditional leave …

SUDHIR MADHUKAR BHOMALEversusBHAVANA ABHINATH SHENDE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sudhir Madhukar Bhomale, challenged his disqualification from the position of Chairman of the APMC Khed on the ground that the agricultural land required for eligibility was owned by his father, not by him. The District Election Officer had disqualified him under Rule 10(3) of the …

SHRI NILESH BHAGWAN SAMBREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Shri Nilesh Bhagwan Sambre, filed a writ petition on 27 November 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 29 August 2026. The court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to circulate the petition …

SATYAKAAM FOUNDATIONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 1st December 2020 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …

HOTEL TOP 87versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Hotel Top 87, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were …

DHANPATSINGH AMARCHAND HINGARHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Dhanpatsingh Amarchand Hingarh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 21 December 2020, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner …

NORTH STAR GEMS (INDIA) LTD. AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners, North Star Gems (India) Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. They failed to appear for the hearing on 9 February 2026 and again on 29 August 2026, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition thereafter. The Court observed that the petitioners …

SUNIL BABU PAGIversusSR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 3 December 2020 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner’s lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive …

IGNITE RESTRO AND LOUNGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed To be withdrawn

Ignite Restro and Lounge filed Writ Petition No. 1357 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request for withdrawal. The judges, A.S. …

RAISA ASIF SHAH AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 7 December 2020 seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioners appeared when called for hearing, and the record shows they made no effort to circulate the petition at any time. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in …

VIPIN SATYAWAN KHANDAGALE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Mathadi workers involved in a violent dispute over loading and unloading contracts, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 and 324. Both parties filed cross‑FIRs but later sought to settle the matter and filed consent affidavits requesting quashing of the FIRs under …

SUNNY KARMVEER DHILOD AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Mathadi workers involved in a violent dispute over loading and unloading contracts, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 and 324. Both parties filed cross‑FIRs but later sought to settle the matter and filed consent affidavits requesting quashing of the FIRs under …

SHILPA SHETTY KUNDRA AND ANRS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Petitioners Shilpa Shetty Kundra & Anr. filed writ petitions (Nos. 480 and 481 of 2021) challenging orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1 and others. After filing, the petitioners and their counsel failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petitions after 8 February 2021. The …

SHILPA SHETTY KUNDRA AND ANR.versusCOMMIISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-1 AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Petitioners Shilpa Shetty Kundra & Anr. filed writ petitions (Nos. 480 and 481 of 2021) challenging orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1 and others. After filing, the petitioners and their counsel failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petitions after 8 February 2021. The …

MEHRUNISSA MOHAMMED SALIMversusM/S. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mehrunissa Mohammed Salim, filed an interim application and a first appeal (Stamp) but failed to appear or prosecute the matters. The Court observed that the appellant had lost interest in pursuing the proceedings. Consequently, the Court dismissed the interim application and the …

MADHUMITA PODDAR SAHAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Madhumita Poddar Saha, filed a writ petition on 9 December 2020 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at the hearing, and the record shows that the petition was never circulated or pursued …

DILIP KUMAR AGARAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Agrawal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after February 11, 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …

ASHUTOSH S/O SHARAD SANGLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners, Ashutosh Sangle, filed writ petitions No. 1024 and 1025 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petitions after …

ASHUTOSH S/O SHARAD SANGLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners, Ashutosh Sangle, filed writ petitions No. 1024 and 1025 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petitions after …

VAIBHAVI RAUT W/O. VISHWANATH RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Smt. Vaibhavi Raut, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel later applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The High Court of Bombay granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was …

RAVI KISHOR GANATRAversusSENIOR INSPECTOR JUHU POLICE STATION AND ANR.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Ravi Kishor Ganatra, filed a writ petition on 11 December 2020 but failed to appear for any hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel circulated the petition even once after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …

RANSON ROYCE ANTHONYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

A writ petition (No. 1362 of 2021) was filed by Ranson Royce Anthony before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 14 December 2020, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court …

NOORUDDIN ISMAIL QURESHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 12 December 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …

DILIPKUMAR SHESHMAL JAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 15 December 2020 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …

VICKY ANIL GHOLAP AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The applicants, Vicky Anil Gholap and others, filed a criminal application seeking quash of the charge-sheet filed against them under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999. The charge-sheet alleged offences of a serious nature and the applicants had fourteen prior antecedents. The …

BAPUSAHEB SHANKAR RAO YADAV AND ANRversusRAMDAS DADASAHEB NIGADE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a husband‑wife duo who owned Chaitanya Agro Hi‑Tech Pvt Ltd, entered into a share purchase agreement with the respondents, leading to arbitration where an award dated 15 March 2013 ordered the respondents to pay Rs 53.20 million. The petitioners filed a Section 34 application to set …

AMKHIM HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., AND ORSversusTHE SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 16 December 2020 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No petitioner or their counsel appeared for any hearing after filing. The court noted that the petitioners made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition at any time. It was …

VASANT VIHAR CO-OP. HSG. SOCIETY LTD.versusSENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Vasant Vihar Co-Op. Hsg. Society Ltd., filed a writ petition on 17 December 2020 but failed to appear for any hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor its counsel circulated the petition even once after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …

PREM NARAYAN RAIversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Prem Narayan Rai, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Commissioner of Police and others. After the hearing on 13 January 2021, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted that the …

KHALID SAMSUDDIDN KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Khalid Samsuddin Khan, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after February 3, 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared …

KALA RANI PERISAMI DEVENDRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Kala Rani Perisami Devendra filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after February 18, 2021, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that …

ABHISHEK MAHENDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Abhishek Mahendra Singh filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the hearing on 10 March 2022, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no …

SIKANDAR RAJMAL CHOURASIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Sikandar Rajmal Chourasia, filed Writ Petition No. 660 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive …

SANTOSH RAMSHARAN PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Santosh Ramsharan Pandey, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 17 February 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …

HITESH RAMESH GANDHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed three criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 812/2025 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

ASHUTOSH CHANDRAversusRAJIV RANJAN CHAUBEY AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Ashutosh Chandra, filed Writ Petition No. 392 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing date of 25th February 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared or took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …

MOHAMMED EJAZ ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

Mohammed Ejaz Ansari filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the trial court acquitted him, his counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted leave to …

AFROZ MOHD. SIRAJ SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Afroz Mohd. Siraj Shaikh applied for anticipatory bail before the Bombay High Court. The applicant was required to file an affidavit disclosing any criminal antecedents by 10 July 2026, as per procedural requirements. He failed to file the affidavit within the stipulated time. The applicant's …

VINAYAK GANESH KAPADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

Vinayak Ganesh Kapade appealed against the Special Court's refusal to grant bail in a murder and related offences case (Crime No.171 of 2023). The appellant, charged under multiple provisions of the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act, SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Maharashtra …

SURYAKANT @ PANDIT DASHRATH KAMBLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The appellant, Suryakant @ Pandit Dashrath Kamble, was convicted in a murder case (Crime No.171 of 2023) involving multiple offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and MCOC Act. He sought bail, which the Special Court had denied. The appellant …

LADULAL HARAKCHAND KANTHER AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered three criminal applications filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIRs registered for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) r/w 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

BHALCHANDRA VITHAL DOLASversusSATU SUDAM DOLAS AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Bhalchandra Vithal Dolas, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vadgaon Maval that rejected his application to produce a Memorandum of Understanding dated 23 September 2020, which he claimed showed Defendant No.5’s admission of his right in the suit property. The …

ABDULLA ZAID CHUNAWALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, a proprietor of a used‑vehicle business, was named in FIR No. 611 of 2026 for alleged fraud involving the use of two different Aadhaar cards by another accused who had purchased a car from him. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

JIMMY ADIL LALKAKAversusMACROTECH DEVELOPERS LIMITED

Disposed Off

The applicant, Jimmy Adil Lalkaka, filed a civil revision application seeking leave to withdraw the proceeding. Counsel for the applicant requested the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The High Court considered whether the application could be withdrawn at this stage. The court …

DEEPAK SATYAWAN KUDALKAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants were charged with cheating and criminal breach of trust for taking deposits from 27 investors, all of which were later returned. The complainants filed affidavits confirming full settlement and requested that the criminal proceedings be terminated. The applicants filed an application …

MOHAN BABANRAO PALANDEversusGAUTAM MANIKRAO DHUMAL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged a trial court order that rejected his application for appointing a Court Commissioner to determine actual physical possession of a disputed property. He argued that the cadastral surveyor, who had initially supported his case, later admitted that the encroachment was not …

VINOD KUMAR NIHALCHAND PARMAR AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR C.R. No.4 of 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant had paid the disputed dues and filed a …

RAMESH PARASHRAM GAWANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine, applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. The prosecution's case relied primarily on the testimony of a child eyewitness who claimed the appellant assaulted her mother with …

BHARATI ANKUSH SANEKAR AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicants, Bharati Ankush Sanekar and another, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cheating case (Crime No. 81 of 2025) filed under IPC Section 420 read with Section 34. The FIR, based on a complaint by Sharvari Vijaykumar Raut, alleged that the applicants received large sums for a …

MOHAN LAXMAN GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Mohan Laxman Gupta applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a cheating case (Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) where a chartered accountant alleged that Gupta received Rs.45,87,500 in cash for a promised share of hotel …

ROHAN PRABHAKAR BACHEWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petition arose from a land sale dispute that led to multiple civil suits and an FIR for cheating and criminal breach of trust. The parties later reconciled through a Memorandum of Understanding and a consent affidavit, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings under Section 528 of the Bharatiya …

MILIND RAMBHAVU KAMBLE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The petitioners were accused in FIR No.22 of 2026 for offences including cheating, forgery and intimidation arising from a commercial dispute over immovable property with Respondent No.2. The dispute was already litigated in a civil suit (Special Civil Suit No. 75 of 2025) which resulted in a decree …

DESERVE EMERALD REALTY PRIVATE LIMITEDversusADARSH KAPOL NAGAR

Disposed Off

Deserve Emerals Realty Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging a District Judge's order that set aside an execution order restraining the respondent cooperative society from creating third‑party interests in a suit property. The dispute centered on whether a compromise memo filed before …

POPAT GANGARAM YELEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The First Informant filed Interim Application No. 2697 of 2026 seeking to intervene in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 557 of 2026 filed by the accused. The High Court allowed the interim application, permitting the addition of the First Informant as a respondent in the bail application and …

RUPA GOVIND NEPALI AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The police raided a brothel in Pune on 12‑12‑2003 and found minor girls in the presence of the accused women, Rupa Govind Nepali and Rita Jithbahadu Thapa. The prosecution proved that the accused had obtained possession of the minors with intent to use them for prostitution, relying on police …

Balu Keru MetkariversusMahadeo Keru Metkari Bergal

Disposed Off

The petitioners Balu Keru Metkari and Alka Ankush Metkari challenged orders dated 1 August 2026 of the City Civil Court that appointed a Court Commissioner to inspect the suit property and submit a report in two related suits. The High Court noted that the Commissioner had already inspected the …

Alka Ankush MetkarversusMahadeo Keru Metkari Bergal

Disposed Off

The petitioners Balu Keru Metkari and Alka Ankush Metkari challenged orders dated 1 August 2026 of the City Civil Court that appointed a Court Commissioner to inspect the suit property and submit a report in two related suits. The High Court noted that the Commissioner had already inspected the …

AJAJ AHMED SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRAAND ANR

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning charges under Sections 10 and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The applicant, the father of a five‑year‑old victim, …

FIROZAKHTAR ALIKHATAR SIDDIQUEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

Petitioner Firozakhtar Alikhatar Siddique filed a writ petition seeking relief, but expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and re‑file after the charge‑sheet is filed. The Court, after hearing counsel, indicated a reluctance to grant the petition but, respecting the petitioner’s request, …

SMT PARVATABAI PUNDLIK TIDKE SINCE DECEASEDversusNATWARLAL CHIMANLAL SHAH

Disposed Off

The legal heirs of deceased Appellant Nos. 1 and 3 filed Interim Application No. 6616 of 2026 seeking to be transposed as respondents in Second Appeal No. 540 of 2005. All original appellants had died, and while the legal representative of Appellant No. 2 was already on record, the heirs of Nos. 1 …

PARVATI MARUTI PATIL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Parvati Maruti Patil, a 75‑year‑old senior citizen, and her daughter‑in‑law sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No.132 of 2022, which alleged offences under IPC sections 504 and 506 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail on the …

KALIDAS YASHWANT LONKAR AND ORSversusNITIN SHIVRAM LONDHE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, owners of a 55‑are plot in Pune, sought a declaration and injunction against defendants who allegedly encroached on their land. During the suit, the defendants executed an Agreement for Sale on 13 March 2026, transferring the disputed portion to third parties, which the petitioners …

VIKAS RANCHOD SHUKLA AND ORSversusMANISHA EKNATH KAVALE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a practising advocate, a tax consultant and his brother, were accused by a tribal lady in a criminal complaint (CR No.440 of 2022) and in turn filed a cross‑complaint (CR No.441 of 2022) against three other individuals alleging assault and robbery, arising from a rivalry over …

PANDURANG ARJUN VIGHNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Pandurang Arjun Vighne, accused No.3 in a murder case involving offences under Sections 302, 201, 364, 324 read with 34 of the IPC. The prosecution’s case was based solely on weak circumstantial evidence and a four‑day‑old last‑seen theory, with a …

AMAN MUSTAK SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of Accused No.3 in a case involving murder, attempted murder, criminal conspiracy and other offences. The applicant was indicted primarily on …

ANIL ATMARAM BHAMBORE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petition arose from a civil dispute over a Memorandum of Understanding concerning possession of flats, where the developer failed to deliver possession and the aggrieved party filed FIR No.196 of 2018 for trespass and mischief. The petitioners sought quashing of the FIR by consent under Section …

UMESH RAMCHANDRA GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Umesh Ramchandra Gaikwad, convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 1,090‑day delay in filing his appeal. The delay was attributed to his incarceration from 15 October 2022, which allegedly impeded his ability to obtain …

DEEPAK RAMAKANT PATILversusNARESH RAMA AHIRE

Allowed

The applicant, who is also the first informant, filed an interim application seeking the court’s direction to discontinue a fixed deposit of Rs.15,93,000 made by the accused and to allow withdrawal of the principal amount with interest. The applicant relied on an earlier order dated 6 October 2025 …

SHIVTEJ POTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

Shivtej Pote applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he might be arrested in connection with FIR No. 358 of 2024 involving alleged phishing and "digital arrest" of a victim who transferred Rs 1.08 crore after being deceived by callers …

KIRAN PURSHOTTAMDAS GORADIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Sections 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No.0321/2023 (IPC §§419, 420) that arose from a tenancy dispute. Both parties had settled the civil dispute and agreed to a consent quashing. The court examined its …

JANKI DEEPAK KOODIYA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER, MUMBAI

Disposed Off

The applicants filed a First Appeal that was admitted on 2 March 2023 with a court order to file a private paper book within one year. Due to an inadvertent failure by the clerk, the private paper book was not filed, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. On 29 August 2026 the applicants moved an …

POLESTAR REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Polestar Realtors Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the handling of Review Petition No. 2 of 2021 by the City Civil Court. The petition sought an order directing the principal judge of the City Civil Court to assign the pending review petition to a …

JAYESH RAMESHCHANDRA SAVLAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioner, Jayesh Rameshchandra Savla, filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking consent quashing of FIR No. 0320 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406 and 420 arising from a tenancy dispute. The High Court examined the applicability of Section 528 (mirroring …

APARNA SALIANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Smt. Aparna Salian filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The learned court observed that the applicant had failed to disclose all her criminal antecedents, contrary to the Supreme Court's directive in Zeba Khan v. State of U.P. The applicant's counsel sought permission …

V. MURUGANANTHAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, V. Muruganantham, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in a case (Crime No. 1258 of 2025) registered for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 409. The FIR …

AYUB ASLAM KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Vasant Anandrao Idhol filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel pointed out that the affidavit disclosing the applicant's criminal antecedents had not been sworn. The counsel sought permission to withdraw the present application and to file a fresh …

CIPLA PHARMA AND LIFE SCIENCESversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G. P.. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition filed by Cipla Pharma and Life Sciences Ltd challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the respondent's Additional Government Pleader sought a pass and subsequently informed the Court that the impugned order would be withdrawn …

BANK OF BARODAversusM/S. NATWARLAL H. MISTRY AND BROTHERS

Dismissed

The Bank of Baroda filed writ petitions challenging three orders passed in Appeal No. 715 of 2008, including an order directing a separate inquiry for mesne profits under Order XX Rule 12 of the CPC. The petitioner argued that no operative direction for such an inquiry existed and that, having …

JAYANTILAL JIWANBHAI PARMARversusDIPAK SHRIPAT KULKARNI AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class in Nashik for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a compensation of Rs.15,00,000, which was later confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The …

MOHAMMAD ISHAQUE KHALIL AHMADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by several teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

NASIR HUSAIN MOHAMMAD ALI ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

ABU HORAIRA MOHAMMAD IBRAHIMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

NAVEED AKTAR SAGHEER AHMEDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

SHAFEEQUE AHMAD JAMEEL HASAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

MR. SHIRKE CHANDRAKANT AND OTHERSversusMR. LIYAKAT HUSSAIN KHAN AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The appellants, Mr. Shirke Chandrakant and others, filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf, indicating that the appellants had lost interest in prosecuting the petition. Respondents (Nos. 1 to 4) were represented by Adv. Harsha Y. Shah and Adv. …

RAHUL DINKAR PATIL AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a practising advocate, a tax consultant and his brother, were accused by a tribal lady in a criminal complaint (CR No.440 of 2022) and in turn filed a cross‑complaint (CR No.441 of 2022) against three other individuals alleging assault and robbery, arising from a rivalry over …

PRABHAKAR SAVITRA MORE AND ANRversusAPPASAHEB BABANRAO DHYABAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to recall the dismissal of their suit against defendants 3 and 4, arguing that no fresh process fee was required for re‑issuing summons at new addresses. The trial court had dismissed the suit on the ground that the petitioners failed to pay the process fee again. The High …

ZAINAB MOHAMMEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed on back‑dated dates. The prosecution alleged that thirteen …

ZAHID HUSAIN MOHAMMAD ALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

JYOTI WD/O RAVINDRA GUNJAL AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA THR. GENERAL MANAGER

DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED.

The applicants, Jyoti w/o Ravindra Gunjal and others, filed an interim application in a civil appellate matter concerning Stamp Act appeal No.2071 of 2022 against the Union of India. The High Court addressed procedural issues relating to service of notice on the respondent and the submission of …

MUDASSIR AHMED MOHAMMED HAROONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

MUDASSIR AHMED MOHAMMED HAROONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The High Court considered multiple anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and school officials accused of forging appointment orders to back‑date their service dates and evade the mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test. The …

JYOTSNABEN D/O KANTILAL PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Jyotsnaben, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the transfer of investigation of CR No.355 of 2024 (charges under Sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC) from the Azad Maidan Police Station to the CBI or State Investigation Department. The police had filed a B‑Summary Report …

CHAND ABDUL REHMAN SHAIKH AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners were accused in an FIR dated 26‑06‑2022 for cheating and forgery relating to a flat and a disputed gift deed. They later filed a civil suit seeking declaratory relief, which was settled by a consent term on 27‑11‑2024 and subsequently disposed of by a National Lok Adalat decree. The …

ANIL KUMAR BHERULAL JAGETIYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed three criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 812/2025 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

TANAJI ROHIDAS GADE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The original writ petition (ST) No.7282 of 2024 was dismissed for non-prosecution by an order dated 3 October 2025. The petitioners filed an interim application on 3 May 2025 seeking to set aside that dismissal and to condone a 16‑day delay in filing the application. The court considered whether the …

AALIA MOHAMMED MUSTAFA AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

SHAIKH SARIYA ATHAR HUSAIN AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

AFEEFA AAFREEN MOHAMMAD AMEENversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

RAMA WD/O. RASIKLAL SHAH AND ORS.versusKIRIT RAMDAS S/O. RAMDAS HARIDAS AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the main application before the trial court had already been disposed of, rendering the writ petition unnecessary. The court took the order of disposal on …

MR.ATUL RALEBHATversusMRS.NEHA RALEBHAT

Disposed Off

The husband appealed against the Family Court’s order granting the wife permanent alimony of Rs.10,00,000 and monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000 for their minor daughter, arguing that the amount was fixed without any evidence of his income or the wife’s needs. The Family Court had earlier granted …

NAKUL JITENDER BHOITEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The appellant, Nakul J. Bhoite, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear or present any counsel. The record indicated that the appellant was not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Mr. P.H. Gaikwad. The …

MAUSIN SULEMAN SHIVANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Mausin S. Shivani, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 397, 452 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He filed a criminal appeal (No. 892 of 1998) challenging the conviction. During the pendency …

DR. DINESH RAMESH CHAVAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, husband and in‑laws, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashal of criminal proceedings initiated on an FIR relating to offences under Sections 323, 406, 498A, 504, 506, 507 and 34 of the IPC. The …

MR. JAGAT KANTILAL SHAH AND ANRversusMR. ABDUL HAMID SHAIKH

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. They failed to appear for hearing on 15 July 2026, 19 August 2026, and again on 28 August 2026 despite notices. The court observed that the petitioners appeared to have lost interest in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the …

HANUMAN BUDHAJI SORKHADE AND ORSversusSHRI ANANT LAXMAN KHANE AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the declaration that respondents were tenants of Survey No.80, arguing that earlier mutation entries and a Section 32M certificate established their own tenancy rights. The court examined the sequence of mutation entries, the absence of a Section 32G purchase price …

DASHRATH GANPAT PATILversusBALARAM BABU SANTE AND ORS

Dismissed

The appellant, Swapnil Dashrath Ganpat Patil, appealed a lower court judgment that dismissed his 2004 suit seeking declaration that a 1972 conveyance deed was forged, cancellation of the deed, and an injunction restraining the respondents from dispossessing him. The lower courts held the suit barred …

TRIMBAK SHANKARNATH BUWA AND ORS.versusTHE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Disposed Off

The appellants, Trimbak Shankarnath Buwa and others, appealed against the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Nashik‑II, seeking a higher market price for land acquired for a maternity hospital. The reference court had enhanced the rate from Rs 20 to Rs 50 per square metre, awarding Rs 96,000, but the …

TINKU RAJENDRAPRASAD KUMAWATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Tinku Rajendraprasad Kumawat, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. After hearing, the court was not inclined to grant relief. The petitioner’s counsel sought and was granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Anthony Maurice LopesversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Vaishali Anil Tikam, was convicted under Section 630(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 for wrongfully withholding a company‑owned residential premises that had been allotted to his father, an employee, and which he continued to occupy after his father's retirement and death. The …

ASHWINI NIKHIL DHANAWADEversusNIKHIL RAJENDRA DHANAWADE

Disposed Off

The petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition while keeping her maintenance contentions open after her maintenance application was rejected by the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division Pune. The respondent objected to the withdrawal. The High Court examined the impugned order dated …

SITARAM MALJI KHAREversusSATYABHAMA PUNJARAM SHINDE

Rejected

The appellant, Sitaram Malji Khare, challenged the trial court's decree ordering specific performance of a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff, Satyabhama Punjaram Shinde. The parties had executed a sale agreement in 2013 with a total consideration of Rs.8,17,000, of which the plaintiff paid …

KAILASH RAMDAS DHOTREversusTEJASWINI KAILASH DHOTRE

Dismissed

The petitioner, Vaishali Anil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents, Tikam and Tejaswini Kailash Dhotre. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, informed the court that the dispute had been amicably settled between the parties. The …

MR.ATUL RALEBHATversusMRS.NEHA RALEBHAT

Disposed Off

The husband appealed a Family Court order that granted the wife permanent alimony of Rs 10,00,000 and child maintenance of Rs 10,000 per month, noting that the court had fixed these amounts on a speculative assumption of the husband’s income of Rs 1,00,000 per month without any evidence. The High …

SARITA RAJU AJWANIversusRAJU GOPAL AJWANI

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sarita Raju Ajwani, filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a family court judgment dated 2 August 2025. The respondent argued that the delay was not merely four days but extended from the e‑filing date of 20 February 2026, amounting to …

ASHOK DNYANOBA TUPEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Additional Sessions Judge had allowed the accused applicants to operate their frozen private bank accounts on the condition that they provide a solvent surety equal to the alleged misappropriated amount. The applicants contended that the accounts were unrelated to the crime and offered an …

VASANT KHASHABA CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Additional Sessions Judge, Navi Mumbai, had ordered that the accused’s private bank accounts remain frozen but allowed them to operate the accounts upon furnishing a solvent surety equal to the alleged misappropriation amount. The accused filed criminal revision applications contending that the …

ASHOK TUKARAM SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Additional Sessions Judge, Navi Mumbai, had ordered that the accused’s private bank accounts remain frozen but allowed them to operate the accounts upon furnishing a solvent surety equal to the alleged misappropriation amount. The accused filed criminal revision applications contending that the …

SHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA VARUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Additional Sessions Judge, Navi Mumbai, had ordered that the accused’s private bank accounts remain frozen but allowed them to operate the accounts upon furnishing a solvent surety equal to the alleged misappropriation amount. The accused filed criminal revision applications contending that the …

APARNA ASHOK SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Additional Sessions Judge had allowed the accused applicants to operate their frozen private bank accounts on the condition that they provide a solvent surety equal to the alleged misappropriated amount. The applicants contended that the accounts were unrelated to the crime and offered an …

BABAN EKNATH KATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Additional Sessions Judge had allowed the accused applicants to operate their frozen private bank accounts on the condition that they provide a solvent surety equal to the alleged misappropriated amount. The applicants contended that the accounts were unrelated to the crime and offered an …

PANDURANG VITTHAL GHADGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Additional Sessions Judge had allowed the accused applicants to operate their frozen private bank accounts on the condition that they provide a solvent surety equal to the alleged misappropriated amount. The applicants contended that the accounts were unrelated to the crime and offered an …

ABDUL SHAKUR WALESAB NADAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing his wife, resulting in her death. The prosecution relied on the testimony of a child eyewitness, multiple oral dying declarations, an extra‑judicial confession, and forensic evidence showing the appellant's blood on the seized …

CHIDANANDA HANMANTRAYAPPAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioner Chidananda Hanmantrayappa filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 18 July 2025. The High Court examined the petition in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of …

PRASAD KAMALKANT KAJBAJEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Prasad Kamalkant Kajbaje, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to 15 days imprisonment with a compensation of Rs.25,000 to the complainant. He appealed, but the Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal. During the pendency of a criminal …

KUMAR DESAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Kumar Desai, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was heard before Justice Milind N. Jadhav. During the proceedings, the petitioner filed a praecipe indicating withdrawal of the petition. Consequently, the …

VALMIK SUKDEV GUMNAR AND ANRversusMAINABAI NANA POMNAR

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged a March 2, 2026 order of the Civil Judge, Malegaon, which allowed the plaintiff to amend the plaint to increase the alleged encroached land from 34 Are to 50 Are. The petitioners argued that the amendment was sought at the fag end of the trial, that the court …

MOSES HANOK SHAPURKAR DECEASED THROUGH LRSversusSMT. SANGITA JANARDHAN CHEVALE

Disposed Off

The appellants filed an interim application seeking permission to bring on record the legal heirs of respondents Nos.5, 7, 8, 10 and 11 in a second appeal. Counsel for the respondents informed the court that he had instructions to appear on behalf of those heirs. The learned judge considered the …

Nitin Shahaji PatilversusThe State of Maharashtra

Dismissed

The applicant, Nitin Shahaji Patil, challenged a judgment allowing the prosecution to issue a witness summons to the Secretary of the Latur Education Board to prove a mark‑sheet (Exhibit‑30) that was central to his conviction for falsifying his Xth board examination results. The applicant argued …

PARAG PRIYANKANT JHAVERIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION BS AND FC

Disposed Off

The applicant, Parag Priyakant Jhaveri, filed criminal applications seeking renewal of his passport, which had expired on 24.05.2026, challenging a condition imposed by an earlier order dated 31.01.2026. The High Court examined whether the condition restricting passport renewal for a four‑year …

SHRI.ANANT VASANT MOHITEversusREVATI VISHNU MOHITE (DECEASED) THRU LRS.

Rejected

The appellant challenged the First Appellate Court's judgment dated 31 March 2017 in Civil Appeal No.62 of 2009, which set aside the Trial Court's decree dated 6 April 2009 in Regular Civil Suit No.144 of 2001. The suit concerned House No.465, with the plaintiff in possession of House No.465A and …

SHRI.ANANT VASANT MOHITEversusREVATI VISHNU MOHITE (DECEASED) THRU LRS.

Disposed Off

The appellant challenged the First Appellate Court's judgment dated 31 March 2017 in Civil Appeal No.62 of 2009, which had set aside the Trial Court's decree dated 6 April 2009 in Regular Civil Suit No.144 of 2001. The suit concerned House No.465, with House No.465A in the plaintiff's possession and …