Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

UMESHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petitioner must seek execution of the decree and cannot obtain relief under the writ jurisdiction of Article 226.

Summary

The petitioner, Umeshankar Shukla, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking protection of his possession rights under a decree dated 21 May 2025 in Original Suit No. 122 of 2026. The High Court examined whether the petitioner could obtain relief through a writ or should instead pursue execution of the decree. The Court observed that the appropriate remedy is to apply for execution of the decree rather than a writ of mandamus or prohibition. Consequently, the petition was not entertained on its merits and was consigned to the records. The judges directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for decree execution.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, is available to the petitioner under Article 226 for enforcement of a decree granting possession?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • decree execution
  • possession
  • writ petition
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - C No. - 37528 of 2026

                                    Umeshankar Shukla
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :     Ram Mohan, Sanjay Dubey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)               :     C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 1
                                                      HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
                                                      HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

                                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel.

                                    By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution,
                                    petitioner wants protection of his rights as to the possession under the lawful
                                    decree passed by the court of competent jurisdiction dated 21.05.2025 in
                                    Original Suit No. 122 of 2026.

                                    In our considered view, petitioner should apply for execution of the decree,
                                    if so advised.

                                    Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records.



                                                                        (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)
                                    September 18, 2026
                                    IrfanUddin




Digitally signed by :-
IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.