Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SANJAY VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is disposed, directing the petitioner to file an application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within ten days, with the matter to be decided per Meena Devi v. State of U.P.

Summary

Petitioner Sanjay Verma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Vice Chairman of the Agra Development Authority to demarcate plot no.602 in Chhipi Tola, Sabji Mandi, Agra. The Court examined whether the petitioner could be compelled to demarcate the plot under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code. It held that the petitioner is entitled to demarcation under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, but any application for such demarcation must be filed within ten days from the order. The Court further directed that the application be decided in accordance with the precedent set in Meena Devi v. State of U.P., 2026 (170) RD 458 after hearing all interested parties. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with these directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for demarcation of the plot under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006
  • Whether the Court can order the Vice Chairman of the Agra Development Authority to demarcate the plot

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • demarcation
  • U.P. Revenue Code
  • Section 24
  • writ petition
  • Agra Development Authority
  • land dispute
  • Uttar Pradesh

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 39208 of 2026

                                    Sanjay Verma
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          :   Virendra Kumar Jaiswal
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          :   C.S.C., Sushil Kumar Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel and
                                    Sri Suresh Kumar Maurya, Advocate holding brief of Sri J.N. Maurya,
                                    learned counsel for the respondent no.4.

                                    2. This writ petition has been filed for directing the Vice Chairman, Agra
                                    Development Authority to demarcate plot no.602, Chhipi Tola, Sabji
                                    Mandi, Agra.

                                    3. If the petitioner intends to get the plot in question demarcated then he
                                    has every right to get it demarcated under section 24 of the U.P. Revenue
                                    Code, 2006. It is further provided that if any application is made to that
                                    effect within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be
                                    decided in light of direction given in Meena Devi vs. State of U.P., 2026
                                    (170) RD 458 after hearing all the interested parties.

                                    4. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                               (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    GS




Digitally signed by :-
GAUTAM SONI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.