Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 1995

917 judgments, newest first — showing 801–917.

P.M. HARI KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5344 September 1995Case Allowed

The petitioner, P.M. Hari Kumar, was arrested in March 1990 for allegedly smuggling silver and was granted bail with conditions. The Kerala government issued a preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) on July 11, 19

DHARAMVIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5354 September 1995Disposed off

The appellant, Dharmavir, worked as a teacher at Adarsh Higher Secondary School from 3 September 1985 after a reserved post remained vacant and another teacher left. He claimed entitlement to salary for the period he performed duties, while the Management alleged that he had already received double payment. The Distric

BRIGHU NATH SAHAY SINGH AND ORS.versusMD. KHALILUR RAHMAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5364 September 1995Dismissed

The appellants, former land intermediaries, claimed ownership of a 4‑bigha agricultural plot in Begusarai, Bihar, and obtained a decree for possession in the trial court and first appellate court. The Patna High Court reversed, holding that under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, the land vested in the State because th

M/S. GUJARAT BOTTLING COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.versusTHE COCA COLA CO. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 4414 August 1995Dismissed

Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd (GBC) entered into a 1993 licence agreement with Coca Cola to bottle and distribute beverages under several trade marks, which included a negative covenant prohibiting GBC from dealing in competing products during the agreement's term. A subsequent 1994 agreement, intended to register GBC as a

DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER, MAHSANA ETC. ETC.versusVIDOTEJAK MANDAL AND ORS. ETC.

1995 INSC 4424 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a District Primary Education Officer, appealed against a Gujarat High Court order that had directed the grant of aid for a clerk and a peon to a trust running a single primary school. The trust claimed that under Rule 115(3) of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1949, institutions operating more than one

SHAMSHUL KANWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

1995 INSC 3374 May 1995Dismissed

In Village Sakhni, Uttar Pradesh, a factional clash erupted during a funeral procession, resulting in the death of ten members of the prosecution party. The accused, led by Shamshul Kanwar, were found to have entered the scene armed and fired indiscriminately, constituting an unlawful assembly under Sections 302 and 14

B.P.L. PHARMACEUTICALS LTDversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA

1995 INSC 3384 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

B.P.L. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. manufactured a Selenium Sulfide Lotion (branded Selsun) containing 2.5% selenium sulfide, used for treating seborrhoeic dermatitis and tinea versicolor. The product was certified as a drug by the FDA, labelled with warnings, and marketed through chemists on prescription. While earlier excise

LAL MANDIversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

1995 INSC 2444 April 1995Disposed off

The appellant was convicted by a Sessions Judge for murder (Sec. 302/34 IPC) and for tampering with evidence (Sec. 201 IPC). On appeal, the Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal without re‑examining the trial evidence, relying on the trial judge’s observation of witness demeanor. The Supreme Court held that an appel

M/S. SAHNEY PARIS RHONE LTD.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD

1995 INSC 2434 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Sahney Paris Ltd. manufactured self‑starter motors for motor vehicles and submitted a classification list placing them under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Assistant Collector and subsequent authorities re‑classified the items under Tariff Item 30, treating them as electric motors, and levied exc

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAYversusM/S KOHINOOR MILLS BOMBAY

1995 INSC 2464 April 1995Dismissed

The case concerned two composite textile mills that manufactured cotton yarn in their weaving departments and used it captive in their spinning departments to produce fabric. An exemption notification dated 18 June 1977 exempted such yarn from excise duty, but a later notification dated 15 July 1977 partially withdrew

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTIAversusBIJOY KUMAR ALMAL

1995 INSC 2474 April 1995Dismissed

The respondent owned an undivided one‑third share in a house occupied as his own residence along with his brother and other co‑owners. For assessment year 1962‑63 the Assessing Officer deducted the amount prescribed under Section 23(2) of the Income‑Tax Act from the total annual letting value of the house and then appo

LAXMI ENGINEERING WORKSversusP.S.G. INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE

1995 INSC 2484 April 1995Dismissed

Laxmi Engineering Works, a small‑scale proprietary concern, bought a CNC universal turning machine from P.S.G. Industrial Institute and alleged it was defective, claiming Rs. 4 lakhs. The Maharashtra Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed part of the claim, but the National Consumer Commission set it aside, hol

GIANI DEVENDAR SINGH SANT SEPOY SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

1995 INSC 54 January 1995Dismissed

The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation alleging that an oil mill near a Gurudwara was being used for smuggling narcotic drugs and that various officials, including a High Court judge, were corrupt. The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued a vague, sweeping order directing the stoppage of such activities and the

MUKHTIAR SINGH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB ETC.

1995 INSC 64 January 1995Remitted to Lower Court

Eleven accused were tried before the Special Court, Ferozepur for murder and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The trial court convicted some and acquitted others but its judgment contained only conclusions without any discussion of evidence or reasons. Appeals were filed under Section 14 of the Terrorist Af

AJIT SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 6853 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned a marble mining lease in Rajasthan where an earlier lease granted to Babula Modi was deemed revoked for failure to execute the formal lease deed within three months. Respondent No.5 applied for the same area on 20 October 1982 and again on 19 January 1983, both of which were rejected as premature.

PRAMLLAversusRAMESHWAR AND ANR.

1995 INSC 6863 November 1995Disposed off

The wife appealed to the Supreme Court under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking a decree of divorce by mutual consent and alimony. The parties, at the Court's suggestion, agreed that the husband would pay the wife Rs 700 per month starting 1 November 1995, with payment due by the 5th of each month. The Cou

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JAIPURversusCHILDREN'S ACADEMY, JAIPUR AND ANR.

1995 INSC 6873 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) offered 15,000 sq. yards of land to Children’s Academy at a reserved price of Rs 160 per sq. metre, requiring full payment of Rs 20,31,820.90. The Academy deposited only Rs 1 lakh, leading to cancellation of the offer. A fresh offer was later made under the same terms, which the A

TATA PRESS LTD.versusMAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 4353 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (the Nigam) and the Union of India claimed exclusive rights to publish the list of telephone subscribers under Rule 458 of the Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951, and sought to restrain Tata Press Ltd. from publishing its "Tata Press Yellow Pages" – a buyers' guide comprising paid advertisement

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusVALLURI VANRAJU

1995 INSC 4363 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Vallurivan Raju, filed a declaration under Section 8(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973. The Land Reforms Officer held that his holding exceeded the statutory ceiling of 1.3590 acres. The High Court, on revision, allowed the exclusion of only 3 acres 5 cen

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ORS.versusMALLANAGOUDA RAYANAGOUDA PATIL AND ORS.

1995 INSC 4373 August 1995Dismissed

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against the Karnataka High Court’s modification of the compensation awarded to the petitioners for acquired land. The High Court reduced the compensation per acre but the Supreme Court affirmed the award and further granted enhanced solatium at 15% and interest at 6% on the

HARBANS SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1995 INSC 4383 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Harbans Singh, who joined the Punjab Department of Legal and Legislative Affairs as a clerk in 1965 and was promoted to Assistant in 1974, claimed promotion to Legal Assistant on the basis of seniority when a vacancy arose in 1977. Ajit Lal Arora, the third respondent, was appointed to the same post on May 20, 1977, af

P.S. GHALAUTversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 4393 August 1995Dismissed

The appellant, a general‑category candidate, and Dr. Nitya Anand, a backward‑class candidate, were appointed as lecturers under the Haryana Medical Education Service Rules, 1965. The appellant argued that the order of merit prepared by the Selection Committee, which placed him higher than Dr. Anand, should determine in

SRI KAPTAN SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.versusRAJINDER SINGH AND ANR.

1995 INSC 4403 August 1995Dismissed

The appellant, the estate of the late Sri Kaptan Singh, filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police to transfer his criminal complaint to an independent police agency, alleging that while in police custody his property was being alienated by a person claiming po

SRI RAJ RAJESHWARI PRASAD SINGHversusSH. SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD SINGH AND.ORS.

1993 INSC 2523 August 1993Dismissed

The appellant, a grandson, sought to reopen a preliminary ex‑parte decree in a title suit concerning a Hindu joint family property, claiming that his grandmother's life estate under a 1942 compromise decree had become an absolute estate under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and that his mother could be

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR. ETC.versusKRISHNA KANT ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 3353 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The employees of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation were dismissed after disciplinary inquiries conducted under certified Standing Orders. They filed civil suits seeking declaration that the dismissals were illegal and that they be reinstated with benefits. The corporation contended that the Civil Court lacked

THE GOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusTHE MADRAS RUBBER FACTORY LTD. ETC.

1995 INSC 3363 May 1995Case Partly allowed

The Government of India appealed against the assessment orders of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise which allowed Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. (MRF) various deductions under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, while disallowing others. The key disputes concerned whether expenses incurred in maint

SAIYAD MOHD. SAIYAD UMAR SAIYED AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1995 INSC 2413 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Three appellants were arrested in Gujarat and, after a police search, charas was seized from them. They were convicted under Section 20 of the NDPS Act and Sections 65 and 66 of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The appellants argued that the police had not informed them of their right, under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, to b

G. RABINATHANversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 2423 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

G. Rabinathan, an Emergency Commissioned Officer in the defence services from June 1963 to September 1967, joined the National Cadet Corps (NCC) from December 1967 to June 1972 and was later appointed as a Probationary Commercial Tax Officer in Karnataka. He sought continuity of service for seniority under Rule 6‑A of

SRI BAGAWATI TEA ESTATES LTD.versusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 963 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, owners of private forests in Kerala, challenged the constitutional validity of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, arguing that the State had failed to implement its agrarian‑reform objectives under Section 10 and that the later Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (and its 1988 a

M/S ISHA MARBLES ETC. ETC.versusBIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 953 February 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the sale of mortgaged industrial premises by the Bihar State Financial Corporation. The purchasers, who acquired the assets at auction, were denied reconnection of electricity because the Bihar State Electricity Board demanded payment of arrears incurred by the previous

SALES TAX COMMISSIONER ETC. ETC.versusB.G. PATEL ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 33 January 1995Dismissed

The case concerned promotion of senior clerks belonging to Scheduled Tribes in Gujarat civil services. Several posts reserved for STs were vacant because no candidates possessed the full experience prescribed in Rule 11‑A of the Gujarat Civil Services Classification and Recruitment (General) Rules, 1985. The respondent

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSEVANIVATRA KARAMCHARI HITKARI SAMITI

1995 INSC 43 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 were amended in 1964 to introduce a liberalised family pension scheme (Rule 268‑H) that could be elected only by government servants who were in service on 29 February 1964 or who joined thereafter. The Sevanivatra Karamchari Hitkari Samiti, an association of retired employees, challen

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusG.K. VAIDYANATHAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6732 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned seniority in the post of Chargeman Grade‑I in the Ministry of Defence, where recruitment was by promotion and direct recruitment under an 80:20 rotation rule. The first respondent (a promotee) was placed junior to direct recruits in the 1982 seniority list and sought its set‑aside, alleging that t

SRI MANOHARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6742 November 1995Disposed off

Sri Manohar appealed against the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal’s dismissal of his service law claim on the ground of laches. The Tribunal had accepted the employer’s explanation for the delay and dismissed the case without a counter‑affidavit from the respondents. The Supreme Court noted that the respondents had no

PUNJAB STATE AND ANR.versusDARSHAN KUMAR

1995 INSC 6752 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Darshan Kumar filed a suit on 25 September 1989 challenging several orders of the competent authority that had withheld his service increments. The trial court held the suit was not barred by limitation because the enquiry procedure under the relevant rules was not followed. The appellate court merely observed that no

MANDEEP KUMAR ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC.

1995 INSC 6762 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, former government employees, were dismissed for multiple unauthorised absences amounting to marginal lapses of one to two days. They challenged their dismissal before the Supreme Court, seeking reinstatement with full back‑pay. The Court examined whether such marginal lapses warranted dismissal or could

STATE OF MANIPURversusSHRI NAMBAM DWIJEN SINGH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6772 November 1995Disposed off

The State of Manipur appealed a Gauhati High Court order that had upheld the filling of vacant Executive Engineer posts in the Civil Circle of the Electricity Department without directing the government to fill all vacancies. The Supreme Court observed that before deciding the merits, the State Government must first ta

STATE OF GUJARATversusNARGES K. PANTHAKY

1995 INSC 6782 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat initiated proceedings under the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 to determine the ceiling and surplus area of a parcel of land. The respondent claimed that an agreement dated 14 October 1969 had transferred 30 acres to his mother, a transfer that had been recorded through mutation on 15

INDER SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 6792 November 1995Dismissed

The Land Acquisition Collector issued an award fixing compensation for three belts of land. Twenty‑two landowners, including the appellants, signed Form K under Rule 9(5)(i) of the Rules, thereby accepting the compensation without protest. Subsequently the appellants filed a writ petition in the Punjab & Haryana High C

THE CANTONMENT BOARD. JABALPLIR AND ORS.versusSRI S.N. AWASTHI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6802 November 1995Disposed off

The Jabalpur Cantonment Board had initially granted permission to S.N. Awasthi and others to construct a building, but later cancelled it. The respondents challenged the cancellation before the High Court, which set aside the cancellation on grounds of natural justice, lack of distinction between the Military Estates O

M/S. LONGIA BIRL COMPANY THROUGH MD. ZIRAZUDDINversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6812 November 1995Disposed off

M/s Longia Bir Company, through its MD, appealed to the Supreme Court against a Patna High Court order dismissing its writ petition concerning the computation of liability under the Provident Fund Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The appellant argued that it was not given an opportunity to be heard before the liabil

BAPU MAHADU. MALI & ORS.versusVITHALRAO BHAUSAHEB DESHMUKH AND ANR.

1995 INSC 6822 November 1995Dismissed

In a suit for possession filed by the rival reversioners, the appellants, who were the landlords, were defendants. The respondents had remained in possession for over twelve years, thereby acquiring title by adverse possession, and the appellants had also entered into a tenancy agreement with them, which under Section

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusSIDDAPPA UJANAPPA MADAR

1995 INSC 6832 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against a compensation order awarded to Siddappa Ujanappa Iviadar, challenging the applicability of Sections 23(1‑A), 23(2) and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as amended by the 1984 Amendment Act. The Court observed that the questions raised had already been decided b

GAUHATI UNIVERSITYversusSHRI NIHARLAL BHATTACHARJEE

1995 INSC 6842 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Gauhati University was served a summons on 28 May 1990 to appear on 29 May 1990 in a suit. The University sought an adjournment, the case was adjourned to 19 July 1990, but the new date was never communicated, leading to an ex parte decree. The University filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC to se

OXFORD ENGLISH SCHOOLversusTHE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ETC.

1995 INSC 4342 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Oxford English School challenged the acquisition of its land by the Government of Tamil Nadu. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published on 8 September 1982 and a declaration under Section 6 was issued on 19 December 1983 (published 15 February 1984). The school obtained a sta

NAVKIRAN SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

1995 INSC 3842 July 1995Disposed off

A group of 17 practising advocates filed a letter‑petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, alleging that the Punjab police had kidnapped and possibly murdered several of their colleagues, including Ranbir Singh Mansahia, Jagwinder Singh, Kulwant Singh and Sukhwinder Singh Bhatti. The State of Punjab replied that

RASHTRIYA CHINI MILLS ADHIKARI PARISHAD, LUCKNOWversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 3852 July 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, Rashtriya Chini Mills Adhikari Parishad, challenged a Uttar Pradesh Government order to sell six sugar factories by filing a writ petition under Article 226 before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. The Division Bench held that the Lucknow Bench lacked jurisdiction because only one factory

BRAMCHARI SIDHESWAR BHAI AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL ETC.

1995 INSC 3822 July 1995Dismissed

The Ramakrishna Mission established a degree college at Rahra with financial assistance from the State and Union governments, and the college was administered by a governing body constituted by the Mission, not the standard pattern prescribed for sponsored colleges. A dispute arose when the teachers' council struck and

NAND KISHORE MEHRAversusSUSHILA MEHRA

1995 INSC 3832 July 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The husband, Nand Kishore Mehra, filed a suit in the Delhi High Court seeking relief concerning properties he alleged were purchased benami in his wife Sushila Mehra's name. The wife moved to have the plaint rejected on the ground that the suit was barred by Section 4 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.

S. RAMESH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 3862 July 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the Karnataka Forest Department Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1987, specifically the proviso to the Note in Schedule to Rule 2, to determine when a Range Forest Officer becomes eligible to be sent for a Diploma Course in Forestry. Two Range Forest Officers, S. Ramesh and N. Shivaraju, had eac

U.P. STATE SUGAR CORPN. LTDversusU.P. STATE SUGAR CORPN. KARAMCHARI ASSO. AND ORS

1995 INSC 3262 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd., a government‑owned company, sought to sell eight loss‑making sugar units. Its net‑worth had fallen by more than 50%, making it a potentially sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. The corporation sent a letter dated 7‑11 May 199

M/S. RAJA RADIO CO., BOMBAYversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY

1995 INSC 3232 May 1995Dismissed

Raja Radio Co imported Class‑E high‑temperature resisting material consisting of presspahn paper laminated with polyester film and paid customs duty under heading 39.01/06 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, together with counter‑vailing duty under tariff item 17(2). The company later claimed a refund, arguing that the go

LORD LINGARAJ BIJE, BHUBANESWAR AND ANR.versusSH. NITYANANDA MISHRA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3272 May 1995Dismissed

Lord Lingaraj, the appellant, let out agricultural land to Dr. Ramendu Ray in 1937, before the Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1939 came into force. After Ray's death his widow Bhibhati succeeded and later transferred the land to the respondents. The appellant filed a Section 68 petition for possession which was

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARHversusM/S. STEEL STRIPS LTD. SANGRUR

1995 INSC 3242 May 1995Dismissed

The assessees, M/s Steel Strips Ltd., manufactured cold‑rolled steel strips from hot‑rolled strips, which under Central Excise Tariff Item 26AA attracted a higher duty (Rs 650/MT) than hot‑rolled strips (Rs 450/MT). The excise authorities contended that the cold‑rolled strips were the result of a distinct manufacturing

PADMAVATHY AMMAversusAMMUNNI PANICKER AND ANR.

1995 INSC 3282 May 1995Dismissed

Padmavathy Amma appealed to the Supreme Court against a decision of the Kerala High Court that awarded a one‑sixth share of a gifted property to the son of her sister, Kochukuni. The dispute arose from a gift made by Padmanabha to his sister, who had two sons and a daughter, and the question was whether the gift was in

PT. RISHIKESH AND ANR. ETC.versusSMT. SALMA BEGUM ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 3252 May 1995

The petitioners, tenants, challenged the validity of Order 15 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which had been inserted by the Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1972 and later amended by the Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act, 1976, on the ground that it was repugnant to the CPC Central (

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JULLUNDURversusAJANTA ELECTRICALS, PUNJAB

1995 INSC 3292 May 1995Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jullundur issued notices under Section 139(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to Ajanta Electricals and its partners, requiring them to file returns within 30 days. The assessees filed their returns and applications for extension of time after the due dates, leading the Income Tax Officer to

RAGHUBAR DAYAL (DEAD)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3302 May 1995Dismissed

The appellant, Raghubar Dayal (deceased), was granted parcels of land in 1956 under the Government Grants Act, 1895 for personal cultivation, subject to lease‑like covenants. In 1974 the prescribed authority, invoking the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, issued a notice determining surplus land an

ARJUNA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3312 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants challenged the High Court's finding that the respondents, being within the ceiling limit under the Maharashtra Land Ceiling Act, could not be declared surplus land holders and thus the allotment of surplus land to them was illegal. The Supreme Court directed both parties to produce the land return filed

VIJAY PAL SINGH AND ANR.versusDY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3322 May 1995Disposed off

A landowner died leaving three sons; one son, B, died leaving his widow S, who occupied his one‑third share for maintenance under Section 11 of the U.P. Zamindari and Land Reforms Act, 1950. After S's death, her daughter C claimed the same one‑third share in consolidation proceedings. The Settlement Officer held S’s ri

U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD AND ANR.versusRAVI KUMAR ANAND AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3332 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Avas evam Vikas Parishad (the Housing Board) allotted flats under a self‑financing scheme but delayed possession, later demanding an escalated price and 18% interest from the allottees. The Allahabad High Court upheld the price escalation but held the interest excessive, directing the Board to relax i

DHANANJAY SHARMAversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3342 May 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a writ of habeas corpus filed by Dhananjay Sharma alleging illegal detention by Haryana police on 15‑1‑1994. The police officials (SSP Anil Davra, Addl SP Sham Lal Goel and SHO Rajinder Singh) denied the allegations and filed false affidavits, while also pressurising the taxi driver Sushi 

THE HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.versusGOVERNOR OF ORISSA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1572 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. entered into a dam‑construction contract with the Government of Orissa. A dispute over escalation charges and other sums exceeding Rs 1 crore was referred to an Arbitration Tribunal, which directed the State to refer the matter to a Special Arbitration Tribunal under the proviso to sub‑s

PREM KUMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1995 INSC 1582 March 1995Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Tarkeshwar Prasad Singh on 13 January 1983, when accused Prem Kumar (Accused No.1) and Ramesh Singh (Accused No.2) entered a bus and fired rifles at the victim, killing him instantly. The trial court convicted the two accused under Section 302 IPC and also under Section 307 IPC; the High

STATE OF GUJARATversusVORA SAIYEDBHAI KADARBHAI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1592 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Gujarat Rural Debtors Relief Act, 1976 was enacted to protect poor rural debtors from exploitation by non‑institutional money‑lenders. Section 14(2) provides that when a debtor’s debt is discharged or reduced, any property pledged as security must be released and returned to the debtor. The Gujarat High Court struc

G.D. ZALANI AND ANR. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 922 February 1995Dismissed

Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd (HAL) sought to upgrade its penicillin‑G production and evaluated proposals from several firms, ultimately selecting Max‑GB (a joint venture of Gist Brocades and Max India) for technology transfer. The appellants (Torrent Gujarat Biotech, SPIC and PBG) alleged that HAL’s Managing Director acte

HABIBULLA KHANversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 932 February 1995Dismissed

The appellants, who had served as Ministers in the Orissa government and later became Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs), were prosecuted for criminal misconduct under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. They contended that, being MLAs at the time of taking cognizance, they were public s

MS. SWATI GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 942 February 1995Disposed off

The petitioner, a candidate in the 1994 Combined Pre‑Medical Test in Uttar Pradesh, challenged a university circular that reserved 65% of seats in medical colleges for reserved categories, alleging violations of Articles 16, 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution and the 50% ceiling set in Indira Sawhney. After the petition

STATE OF ORISSAversusSANGRAM DAS

1995 INSC 12 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Sangram Das, applied for a vacancy of Assistant Law Officer in Orissa and, after a merit-based appointment to another post, sought direction from the Administrative Tribunal to be appointed to a subsequent vacancy. The Tribunal ordered the State to appoint him, but the State appealed to the Supreme Cour

BIRLA CEMENT WORKSversusG.M. WESTERN RAILWAY AND ANR.

1995 INSC 22 January 1995Dismissed

Birla Cement Works, a cement manufacturer, paid excess freight charges after a gauge conversion added 34 km to the railway distance. The company discovered the mistake when the railway admitted the error on 12 Oct 1990 and claimed a refund under Section 78-B of the Indian Railways Act. The Railway Claims Tribunal dismi

MD. NOORUL HODAversusBIBI RAIFUNNISA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 8211 December 1995Dismissed

The petitioner, MD Noorul Hoda, bought land benami in the name of his brother‑in‑law Rafique on 1 December 1959. Respondents obtained a partition decree (preliminary decree 22 January 1973, final decree 9 February 1974) allocating the land to Bibi Raifunnisa. The petitioner later obtained a second sale deed from Rafiqu

RAJEEV METAL WORKS AND ORS.versusTHE MINERAL METAL TRADING CORPN. OF INDIA LTD.

1995 INSC 8221 December 1995Dismissed

Rajeev Metal Works applied to the District Industry Centre for 300 MT of galvanized steel sheets, which were to be procured by the statutory agency MMTC Ltd. on its behalf. MMTC pooled requirements, placed a consolidated indent with a foreign seller, but could supply only a portion of the quantity; the appellant failed

DR. MAHESH CHAND SHARMAversusSMT. RAJ KUMARI SHARMA AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 8231 December 1995Case Partly allowed

Ram Nath Dewan executed a 1942 will granting his wife Satyawati a life estate in the Doctor's Lane house and directing that after her death the property go to his legal heirs. After Ram Nath's death, the son (first defendant) contested the will, claiming a later 1950 will, and the parties litigated until a 1955 settlem

M/S KABARI PVT. LTD.versusSHIVNATH SHROFF AND ORS.

1995 INSC 8241 December 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement and were ordered by the High Court to amend the plaint to implead the purchaser, Kabari Pvt. Ltd. Although the amendment was allowed in 1982, the plaintiffs failed to act on it for about ten years despite being aware of their own laches and the ne

GULABRAO KESHAVARAO PATIL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1995 INSC 8251 December 1995Dismissed

The appellants challenged the acquisition of land near Surat railway station under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after filing objections to the notification. The Revenue Department advised that, considering the objections and a revenue circular, the acquisition could not be sanctioned, while the Urban Development Dep

M/S VIJAY TRADERSversusM/S BAJAJ AUTO LTD.

1995 INSC 6631 November 1995Dismissed

Mysore Traders, a partnership firm, were appointed by Bajaj Auto Ltd as sole distributors of Vespa scooters and auto‑rickshaws in Ahmednagar. The firm claimed that the appointment created an agency coupled with interest, making the termination of the distributorship without reasonable notice wrongful under Section 206

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusMOHD. ABDUL GHANI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6601 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Sixteen villages that were originally part of Murshidabad district and fell within the Jangipur Parliamentary Constituency under the Delimitation Order, 1976, were later administratively transferred to the district of Maida due to a change in the course of the River Ganges. The residents filed a writ petition seeking a

B.C. CHATURVEDIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6611 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Income Tax Officer, was investigated by the CBI and found to hold assets disproportionate to his known income. Although the evidence was insufficient for criminal prosecution under Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, a departmental inquiry proved the misconduct and dismissed him

STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ETC.versusL. KRLSHANAN AND ORS. ETC.

1995 INSC 6621 November 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined three notifications issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act for acquiring land for the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. It held that a final and effective scheme under the Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act is not a pre‑condition for issuing such a notification, and that the public purpose stat

BAWA NIHAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, FARIDKOT.

1995 INSC 6641 November 1995Disposed off

The appellant, Bawa Nihal Singh, filed a civil miscellaneous petition but failed to pay the required deficit process fee and to file the necessary applications despite multiple notices from the court. The court issued several reminders on 15 May 1993, 13 June 1994, 15 July 1994, and 6 August 1994, each time attaching a

PAPANNA AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.

1995 INSC 6651 November 1995Dismissed

The appellants filed Civil Appeals Nos. 6258‑59 of 1983 challenging the validity of a notification issued under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. The decree sought to be challenged was common to all appellants and was indivisible. The court had earlier directed the senior‑advocate‑designated counsel to inform t

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBABU GOVIND GAVATE ETC.

1995 INSC 6661 November 1995Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra acquired land for an electricity sub‑station under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, awarding Rs 5,000 per acre but deducting one‑third of the amount as interest per a 1972 government circular. The landowner challenged this deduction, and while the appellate court upheld it, the Bombay High Court

CENTRAL BANK OF !NOIAversusM/S. MADAN LAL AND BROTHERS AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6671 November 1995Disposed off

The Central Bank of India obtained a decree against M/s. Madan Lal and Brothers for a debt and directed execution against a hypothecated factory premises. The respondents contended that the property should be sold at its market value, with the proceeds applied to the decree, and that any shortfall could be recovered fr

SMT. INDUMATI CHITALEYversusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 6681 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Government acquired 17.57 acres of land within Nagpur municipal limits for a grain godown under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The acquisition officer paid compensation based on a per‑square‑foot market value, while the reference court and the High Court used differing methods, leading to a dispute over th

SMT. JAYAMMA AND ANR.versusSMT. THIMMAMMA (DEAD) BY L.RS.

1995 INSC 6691 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, daughters of Doddahanumegowda, filed a suit seeking exclusive possession of his coparcenary property, asserting that as the sole surviving coparcener D could bequeath the entire estate to them. The appellants, daughters of D’s predeceased son Chikhanumegowda, claimed a right to a share under the Hindu

MARWARI PANCHAYAT, AMRITSAR ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6701 November 1995Dismissed

The appellant challenged the validity of land acquisition proceedings initiated by Khanna Improvement Trust under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922. The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was filed belatedly, having been filed in 1988 despite the notification of acquisition being published

YADU NANDAN GARGversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6711 November 1995Dismissed

The appellant purchased land in 1970 and built a house after a preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 had been issued in 1963 for the planned development of Jaipur. The declaration under Section 6 was only published in 1991, and the appellant’s applications for exemption

SHRI JAGDISH SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6721 November 1995Dismissed

The case concerned Jagdish Singh's challenge to the compensation awarded for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The acquisition officer initially fixed different rates for two blocks, which were later consolidated by the reference court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court to a uniform rate of Rs 10 per

HOUSING BOARD HARYANAversusHOUSING BOARD COLONY WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5241 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Housing Board of Haryana issued additional price demands to allottee families after a land price escalation, which the allottee association contested before the District Consumer Forum. The Forum quashed the Board's demand and the Board appealed to the State Commission, which dismissed the appeal as time‑barred und

U.P. SALES TAX ASSN.versusTAXATION BAR ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5251 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Association challenged a writ issued by the Allahabad High Court that restrained a Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) Sales Tax, Agra, from exercising his quasi‑judicial powers under Section 9 of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948, and ordered the transfer of his pending cases. The Bar Associa

RAM KISHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5291 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Kishan, a constable of the Delhi Police, was charged with facilitating an under‑trial prisoner to consume alcohol and with abusing superior officers. The departmental inquiry found the first charge unproved and the second partly proved, but the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (ADC), acting as disciplinary

K. KANDASWAMYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 5301 September 1995Dismissed

K. Kandaswamy, an IPS officer, was compulsorily retired by the Government of India under Rule 56(j) of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958, after a special report raised doubts about his integrity, including a suspicious request to purchase a coffee estate. He challenged the order before

B.D. JADHAVARversusK.D. BHAGWAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5311 September 1995Dismissed

The appellant was initially appointed as an ad‑hoc lecturer in a college that lacked sufficient students, and was transferred to another college where he was directed to report for duty. Instead of reporting, he demanded a regular appointment, which was refused, and he obtained a tribunal order directing his regular ap

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusTARAK SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 3171 May 1995Disposed off

The Indore Development Authority (IDA) acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and a reference court enhanced the compensation from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 88,000 per hectare. IDA filed a memorandum of appeal in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, paying the fixed court fee, but the High Court ordered it to pay an ad v

UNION OF INDIAversusTHAMISHARASI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3181 May 1995Dismissed

The Narcotics Control Bureau seized a consignment of hashish and arrested three persons under the NDPS Act. The complaint was not filed within the 90‑day period prescribed in the proviso to Section 167(2) of the CrPC, and the accused claimed an automatic right to bail. The High Court allowed the bail, holding that the

SRI R.N.A. BRITIOversusTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3191 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

R.N.A. Britto, appointed as Secretary of the Bajpe Panchayat under the Karnataka Village and Local Boards Act, 1959, was terminated by a memo dated 4 November 1986. He challenged the termination before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, which dismissed his petition on the ground that he was not a civil servant of t

CITIZENS FOR DEMOCRACYversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3201 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

A journalist, writing as President of Citizens for Democracy, petitioned the Supreme Court under Article 32 alleging that seven TADA detainees lodged in Guwahati Medical College Hospital were handcuffed and tied with ropes, violating their constitutional rights. The State of Assam countered, claiming a high risk of esc

VIDYAWATIversusMAN MOHAN AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 3211 May 1995Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for possession of a property against the first defendant, who was deceased, and the second defendant, the petitioner. The petitioner sought to file an additional written statement asserting title under a will, but the trial court dismissed the application, holding that a legal representative

K. RAHEJA CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. AND ANR.versusALLIANCE MINISTRIES AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3221 May 1995Dismissed

The petitioners filed a suit for a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from dealing with a trust property. After the suit was filed, they discovered that the Charity Commissioner had granted permission to sell the property and sought to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 to claim specific performance o

M/S. REAL FOOD PRODUCTS LTD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusA.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1491 March 1995Dismissed

The appellants, high‑tension electricity consumers including Real Food Products Ltd., challenged the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board’s tariff revisions, arguing that the board’s imposition of a fuel‑adjustment cost only on high‑tension users and the flat‑rate concession for agricultural pump sets violated Articl

BALWANT SINGH AND ANRversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1995 INSC 1511 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Balwant Singh and Bhupinder Singh, two government employees, were arrested in Chandigarh on 31 October 1984 for shouting slogans such as "Khalistan Zindabad" and "Raj Karega Khalsa" on the day Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated. They were convicted under Sections 124A (sedition) and 153A (promoting enmity) o

GURDIAL SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1995 INSC 1521 March 1995Dismissed

A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued to acquire 4.5 acres of land in Punjab. The Collector initially awarded Rs.13,816 per acre as compensation. The Additional District Judge enhanced it to Rs.2,50,000 per acre, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court reduced the award to Rs.30,000

SH. KISHANDAS KANHAIYALAL GANDHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASTRA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 1531 March 1995Dismissed

Sh. Kishandas Kanahiyalal Gandhi was declared to have a surplus of 45 acres 30 guntas of agricultural land under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. He argued that the tenant, Om Prakash, had crystallised tenancy rights over 47 acres 17 guntas, thereby removing the surplus, and alternati

MAHANT SHREO NATH CHELA BABA PURAN NATHversusSTATE OF HARYANA THROUGH COLLECTOR

1995 INSC 1541 March 1995Dismissed

The appellants' 27 acres of land were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and initially awarded Rs 5 per marla. Subsequent proceedings resulted in the High Court classifying the land into blocks A, B and C, and, relying on the precedent Mange Ram v. State of Haryana, fixing compensation at Rs 6.75 per square

P.V. DEVASSIAversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1551 March 1995Dismissed

The appellant, P.V. Devassia, executed two gift deeds transferring 10 acres and 11 acres of land to his two married sons and sought exemption of those lands from the ceiling area prescribed under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The Land Tribunal allowed an exemption of only six acres to each son, a decision affirmed

TEJA SINGH AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

1995 INSC 1561 March 1995Dismissed

The Improvement Trust of Ludhiana framed a Development‑cum‑Housing scheme which was later modified and sought State sanction under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922. The appellants challenged the scheme on the grounds that the modified scheme required re‑publication, that notices under sections 36 and 38 were not s

M/S. WARDEN AND CO., (INDIA) PVT. LIU.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE

1995 INSC 901 February 1995Dismissed

M/s. Warden and Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. manufactures fibre drums whose cylindrical side is paper, while the lids and bottom are plywood reinforced with steel rings. The company sought to have the drums classified under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 17(4) and to claim exemption under Notification No. 66/1982. The Assista

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.versusRAKESH MENON AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 881 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

A Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the State could not reduce the minimum qualifying marks in General English for admission to medical and dental colleges to create seats for SC/ST candidates. The State of Madhya Pradesh filed Special Leave Petitions challenging that order. The Supreme Court, r

UNION OF INDIAversusD. MOHAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 911 February 1995Case Partly allowed

The Hyderabad Telecom District was merged with the Andhra Pradesh Telecom Circle in 1986, and a common seniority list was issued for all officials. The Chief General Manager rotated Junior Telecom Officers, transferring the respondents from Hyderabad to the Telangana District. The Central Administrative Tribunal set as

STATE OF M.P.versusMAHALAXMI FABRIC MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 891 February 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined petitions by the State of Madhya Pradesh and the Union of India challenging a 1991 notification that raised royalty rates on coal under Section 9(3) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957. The petitioners argued that Section 9(3) was an unconstitutional delegation of

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search