VARDAN ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX CENTRAL SECTION & ORS
2023 INSC 108731 October 2023Disposed off
Vardan Associates Pvt. Ltd., a contractor registered under the CGST and West Bengal GST Acts, moved a capital goods machine from Uttar Pradesh to West Bengal using an e‑way bill that expired before the consignment entered West Bengal. The goods were detained and the authorities demanded GST of Rs 54 lakhs and an equal …
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusN. SANJAY
2025 INSC 97331 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that granted anticipatory bail to N. Sanjay, an IPS officer who was Additional Director General of Police, CID, and Director General of the State Disaster Response and Fire Services, alleging misappropriation of public funds through irregular tenders and c…
BHARAT SHER SINGH KALSIAversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
2024 INSC 7731 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Bharat Sher Singh Kalsia, purchased a portion of land from a Power of Attorney (PoA) holder who had been authorized by the landowners to manage, sell, and register their property. A FIR was lodged alleging criminal offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC, claiming the sale deed was fraudul…
ERNAKULAM REGIONAL COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. ETC.versusNITHU & ORS. ETC.
2024 INSC 23031 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Ernakulam Regional Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd. issued a 2011 notification for regular recruitment of Plant Attender, Grade‑III, prompting several workers to claim they were casual labourers who had served over 240 days in the preceding year and thus were entitled to regularisation under the Industrial Dis…
SURAJ SINGH GUJAR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2024 INSC 66130 August 2024Disposed off
The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 323, 324 and 325 read with section 34 for an assault incident that occurred between close relatives. They later executed a compromise deed on 29 January 2024, seeking the Court’s permission to compound the offences. The Supreme Court examined whether the conviction for t…
STATE OF HARYANAversusDHARAMRAJ
2023 INSC 78429 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana appealed against an order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court that granted anticipatory bail to Dharmaraj, who was charged under multiple IPC sections including 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, 342, 427, 186, 353 and 364. Dharmaraj had been declared a proclaimed offender on 5 February 2021, yet he appl…
SATBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2023 INSC 78629 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Satbir Singh filed a criminal complaint alleging that former employees stole proprietary data and used it to manufacture equipment. During the trial, his testimony was recorded before the Central Forensic Sciences Laboratory (CFSL) report was produced. When the CFSL expert testified, he described data found on the accu…
AJWARversusWASEEM AND ANOTHER R1: WASEEM R2: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 96829 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Ajwar filed a criminal appeal challenging a bail order granted by the Allahabad High Court to respondent No.1, Waseem, who had been repeatedly granted and then cancelled bail by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had earlier cancelled the bail on two occasions, directing that any future bail could be so…
STEVE KANIKAversusNEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA) & ANR.
2024 INSC 65327 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant's father applied to NOIDA for a plot in 2006 and, after his death in 2007, was allotted a plot in an open lottery in October 2009. NOIDA cancelled the allotment in September 2011, arguing that the allotment was made to a deceased person. The appellant contended that the civil rights vested in his father p…
YADWINDER SINGHversusLAKHI ALIAS LAKHWINDER SINGH & ANR. ETC.
2025 INSC 42026 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Yadwinder Singh, complained that his brother was murdered in a politically motivated incident and that the private respondents were present at the scene, as testified by eye‑witnesses. The trial court issued summons against the private respondents under Section 319 of the CrPC, but the High Court set asi…
MARIPPAN & ANR.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.
2025 INSC 16324 January 2025Case Allowed
The appellants, parents of a man who had a relationship with a woman, sought to quash the chargesheet filed against them under Section 482 of the CrPC, alleging that the High Court erred in rejecting their petition. The complainant claimed the parents had assured her of marriage to their son, leading to an intimate rel…
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusSANJAY KUMAR
2025 INSC 56123 April 2025Dismissed
The State of Himachal Pradesh prosecuted Sanjay Kumar (A1) and Chaman Shukla (A2) for kidnapping, rape and related offences arising from the alleged abduction of a 14‑year‑old girl in March 2012. The trial court convicted both accused, but the Himachal Pradesh High Court set aside the convictions, acquitting them on th…
MUPPIDI LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 56223 April 2025Case Allowed
The appellants, relatives of the husband in a matrimonial dispute, were charged in an FIR alleging they instigated dowry demands, although they lived in Hyderabad while the complainant resided in Guntur. The complainant had earlier withdrawn a restitution of conjugal rights case and later filed a police complaint after…
ADV BABASAHEB WASADE & ORSversusMANOHAR GANGADHAR MUDDESHWAR & ORS
2024 INSC 5223 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, a charitable society, faced a dispute over the validity of its 2002 executive elections after the President, Vice‑President, Secretary and other office‑bearers had died, leaving a Working President, Adv. Babasaheb Wasade, to manage affairs. Sixteen members requested a meeting to elect a ne…
SEEMANT KUMAR SINGHversusMAHESH PS & ORS.
2023 INSC 27221 March 2023Appeal(s) allowed
During bail proceedings of a police officer (Respondent No.1) under Section 439 Cr.PC, the Karnataka High Court made adverse remarks against three appellants – a senior IPS officer (Appellant No.2) and a district collector (Appellant No.3) – who had no lis in the bail matter, and also directed the CBI to investigate th…
TOSH KUMAR SHARMAversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD & ORS. R1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD R2: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH R3: SELECTION & APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE OF U.P.H.J.S. EXAMINATION
2025 INSC 92116 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Tosh Kumar Sharma, had ranked 38th in the merit list for the 2016 direct recruitment to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service, where 37 General Category posts were advertised. The High Court forwarded the top 37 names for appointment, but the Governor approved only 36, leaving one vacancy. The appell…
SUBODH SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 45816 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant's land was partially acquired under notifications issued under Section 20(E)(1) of the Indian Railways Act, 1989, and an award was made on 8 February 2010, leaving out a parcel of 0.0624 hectare. The High Court ordered compensation for the left out parcel but limited additional compensation for delay to t…
ASIAN PAINTS LIMITEDversusRAM BABU & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 82814 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Asian Paints Ltd., a paint manufacturer, discovered that counterfeit paints bearing its brand were being sold by Ram Babu. The company, through a power of attorney, engaged an IPR consultancy to investigate and the investigation led to an FIR under the IPC and Copyright Act. The trial court convicted Ram Babu, but the …
IN RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS versus
2024 INSC 46114 May 2024Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the status reports filed by several states on the implementation of its earlier prison‑reform directives, focusing on overcrowding, inadequate infrastructure, and the welfare of women prisoners and children. The Court noted persistent delays, lack of approvals, and insufficient action by the …
B. S. HARI COMMANDANTversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 36913 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
B.S. Hari, a Commandant in the Border Security Force, was convicted by a General Security Force Court for allegedly permitting the smuggling of acetic anhydride across the India‑Pakistan border and was sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment, a fine and dismissal from service. The conviction rested mainly on the …
JSW STEEL LTD.versusTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MUMBAI PORT TRUST MUMBAI & ORS.
2025 INSC 25713 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
JSW Steel Ltd. (appellant) challenged a High Court order that allowed the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.1) to withdraw Rs.70 lakh it had deposited as security for the removal of a capsized barge wreck. The dispute centered on whether liability for removing the wreck under Section 14 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 fel…
NUTAN KUMARIversusB.R.A. BIHAR UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 96612 October 2023Disposed off
The University of Bihar advertised vacancies for Physical Training Instructors (PTIs) in four constituent colleges, requiring separate applications for each college and specifying eligibility criteria. The university’s selection committee conducted four separate interviews for each candidate on the same day, assigning …
HARESH SHANTILAL AVLANI & ANRversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
2024 INSC 25112 March 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered two appeals challenging the reduction of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) on the ground that, for an unmarried deceased, the multiplier should be based on the age of the parents rather than the age of the deceased. The appellants, parents of the deceased, ar…
M/S NEW WIN EXPORT & ANR.versusA. SUBRAMANIAM
2024 INSC 53511 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. After a series of appeals, the High Court reinstated the conviction, but the parties subsequently entered into a settlement agreement where the appellants paid the complainant R…
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusRAJKUMAR YADAV
2026 INSC 22511 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
Rajkumar Yadav applied for the post of constable (driver) in the Madhya Pradesh Police but was rejected by the screening committee because he had been involved in offences of kidnapping, abduction and rape of a minor girl, and his acquittal by the trial court was only on the basis of benefit of doubt, not an honourable…
SYNDICATE BANKversusN. R. BHAT
2023 INSC 106410 October 2023Disposed off
The respondent, a former officer of Syndicate Bank, was dismissed in 1997, a dismissal later set aside by the Karnataka High Court in 2005. While the writ proceedings were pending, the parties executed a Joint Compromise Memo on 17 June 2019, wherein the bank agreed to replace the dismissal penalty with a reduction in …
KHURSHEED & ANR.versusSHAQOOR
2024 INSC 76410 September 2024Dismissed
The dispute concerned agricultural land in Haridwar where the mother of Petitioner No.1 allegedly fraudulently claimed inheritance and executed a sale deed on 09‑08‑2016 by impersonation, a deed the Respondent sought to cancel. The Respondent filed a civil suit for cancellation, but the defendant filed an application i…
SRI M.V. RAMACHANDRASA SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY LEGAL HEIRSversusM/S MAHENDRA WATCH COMPANY REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS & ORS.
2026 INSC 34810 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The landlord, the legal heirs of the deceased Sri M.V. Ramachandrasa, sued M/s Mahendra Watch Company and its partners for unlawful sub‑letting of a shop premises in Bengaluru. The trial court held that the original tenant had part‑ed with legal possession to respondents No.2 and No.3, who were strangers to the lease, …
ALAGAMMAL AND ORS.versusGANESAN AND ANR.
2024 INSC 2810 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The sellers (Alagammal and others) entered into a registered agreement of sale on 22‑Nov‑1990 with the buyers (Ganesan and others) for Rs.21,000, stipulating that the balance be paid within six months. The buyers paid only a fraction of the amount and failed to complete the purchase before the deadline, while the selle…
SANKAR PADAM THAPAversusVIJAYKUMAR DINESHCHANDRA AGARWAL
2025 INSC 12109 October 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a liaison for a private university, was issued a cheque of Rs.5 crore by the respondent, who was the Chairman and authorized signatory of Orion Education Trust, but the cheque was dishonoured. The appellant filed a criminal complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and …
M/S GODWIN CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER, MEERUT DIVISION & ANR.
2025 INSC 12078 October 2025Dismissed
Godwin Construction Pvt. Ltd. executed a document titled “Security Bond cum Mortgage Deed” in favour of the Meerut Development Authority to secure its obligations under a development project. The authorities later claimed that the instrument attracted stamp duty under Article 40 of Schedule 1‑B of the Indian Stamp Act,…
MALLEESWARIversusK. SUGUNA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 10808 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a daughter of a co-parcener, sought to amend a 2003 preliminary decree in a partition suit to claim a one‑third share under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. The trial court dismissed her application, the High Court set aside that dismissal, but the respondent obtained a review order that reman…
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusRANJAN KUMAR & ORS.
2026 INSC 4668 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant State of Jharkhand sought to uphold the dismissal of Constable Ranjan Kumar, who was found to have obtained dual appointments in Jharkhand and Bihar police forces using forged documents and assumed a false identity. The respondent contested the dismissal, alleging lack of evidence, procedural irregulariti…
MAHENDRA KAUR ARORAversusHDFC BANK LTD
2024 INSC 4328 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a landlady, leased part of her commercial premises to HDFC Bank for nine years. The bank gave three months' notice to terminate the lease but failed to hand over vacant possession and did not pay use‑and‑occupation charges, while also not refunding the security deposit. The Rent Tribunal decreed eviction…
DHARMRAO SHARANAPPA SHABADI AND OTHERSversusSYEDA ARIFA PARVEEN
2025 INSC 11877 October 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, Syeda Arifa Parveen, claimed ownership of 24 acres of agricultural land on the basis of being the sole daughter of Khadijabee and of an oral gift (hiba) of 10 acres made by her mother. The trial court rejected the oral gift but granted her a 3/4 share of the remaining land, while the Karnataka High Court…
INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 4067 May 2024Directions issued
The Indian Medical Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking redress for the proliferation of misleading and deceptive advertisements, particularly in the food and health sectors. The Court examined the responsibilities of manufacturers, service providers, advertisers, advertising agencies, and endorse…
THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA BAGALKOTE DISTRICT, BAGALKOTversusCHANDRASHEKAR & ANR.
2026 INSC 316 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The Karnataka Lokayukta initiated criminal prosecution against an Executive Engineer (Electrical) accused of demanding a bribe after a successful trap set up by the Anti‑Corruption Bureau. The department’s disciplinary enquiry later exonerated the officer on technical grounds, prompting him to seek quashing of the crim…
C.P. FRANCISversusC.P. JOSEPH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 10713 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the succession to the suit‑schedule property of the deceased parents, C.R. Pius and Philomina Pius, who had executed a joint will bequeathing the property to the appellant C.P. Francis. The respondents, other children of the deceased, challenged the will on the grounds of lack of testamentary capa…
SANT BHAGWAN BABA SHIKSHAN MANDAL & ORS.versusGUNWANT & ORS.
2024 INSC 4053 April 2024Disposed off
The appellant society employed respondent No.1 as a peon from 1991, and after he obtained a B.A. and B.P.Ed., he sought promotion to the post of Shikshan Sevak, a teaching position reserved for non‑teaching staff who acquire the requisite qualifications. The High Court had directed the society to appoint him to that po…
ANIL KISHORE PANDITversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 1882 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant applied for a contractual Amin post under a public advertisement that fixed the age cut‑off at 40 years as of 1 January 2011. After he cleared the written exam and was placed high on the merit list, the authorities issued a later notice changing the cut‑off date to 1 November 2011, thereby disqualifying h…