Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

ANIRUDDHA BOSE

74 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2023 INSC 77931 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The wife, Bhawna, filed a FIR in 2013 alleging dowry harassment by her mother‑in‑law and brothers‑in‑law under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accused filed petitions under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the FIR, but the High Court dismissed them even after a charge‑sheet was f

DR. Y. IBEHAIBI DEVI (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER (HIGHER AND TECHICAL EDUCATION) GOVERNMENT OF MANIPUR & ANR.

2022 INSC 37531 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, eight retired assistant professors and a college librarian from Manipur, claimed a revised pension entitlement effective from 1 April 2010 based on an Office Memorandum (OM) dated 5 May 2010, which was issued by the Governor and had statutory force. The State Government issued a later OM on 24 December

BAITULLA ISMAIL SHAIKH AND ANR.versusKHATIJA ISMAIL PANHALKAR AND ORS.

2024 INSC 7130 January 2024Dismissed

The appellants, who bought a building in 1992, sought to evict two tenants after a municipal demolition notice was issued in 2002, invoking sections of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 relating to bona‑fide need, demolition and rent default. The trial and appellate courts granted eviction decrees, finding the lan

SACHIN GARGversusSTATE OF U.P & ANR.

2024 INSC 7230 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior manager of Exide Industries Ltd., was summoned by a magistrate to stand trial under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged criminal breach of trust and intimidation arising from a commercial dispute over the price of dissolved acetylene gas supplied by the respondent. The

SUDAM KISAN GAVANE (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.versusMANIK ANANTA SHIKKETOD (D) BY LRS. & ORS.

2019 INSC 97729 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a decree. The High Court admitted the appeal but did not frame any substantial question of law before hearing, and only mentioned such questions in the judgment. The Supreme Court held that this procedure violates t

M/S DEEP INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.

2019 INSC 129928 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Deep Industries Ltd, was contractually terminated by ONGC for allegedly supplying second‑hand equipment and was subsequently black‑listed for two years. The dispute was referred to arbitration, where the arbitrator stayed the blacklist order conditionally, and the first appeal under Section 37 was dismis

VERNONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2023 INSC 65528 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the Bhima‑Koregaon violence of December 2017, after which the National Investigation Agency (NIA) expanded the investigation, searched the residences of several activists and arrested Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira. The prosecution alleged that the two were members of the banned CPI (Maoist) and

MADAN LALversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2019 INSC 96327 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and respondents were in dispute over the allocation of water to their agricultural fields. The appellant first approached the authorities under the Rajasthan Irrigation and Drainage Act, 1954, but lost, and subsequently filed a suit in the civil trial court challenging the order of the appellate authority

M/S PAUL RUBBER INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusAMIT CHAND MITRA & ANR.

2023 INSC 85425 September 2023Dismissed

The dispute arose from a five‑year lease agreement dated 27‑03‑2003 between Paul Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. (lessee) and the landlady (respondents) for approximately 16 cottahs of land in Kolkata, which included a clause for renewal and described the premises as having a factory shed. The lease was not registered, alt

SUNIL KUMAR @ SUDHIR KUMAR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2021 INSC 29825 May 2021Case Partly allowed

The appellants Sunil Kumar and others were convicted under IPC sections 363, 366 and 376(1) and sentenced to separate terms of rigorous imprisonment without any indication whether the sentences should run concurrently or consecutively. Both the trial court and the High Court failed to specify the mode of running of the

ST. MARY’S EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR.versusRAJENDRA PRASAD BHARGAVA & ORS.

2022 INSC 85624 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The private unaided minority school St. Mary's Education Society terminated the services of its non‑teaching employee, Rajendra Prasad Bhargava, after a disciplinary enquiry. Bhargava filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to set aside the termination and the disciplinary committee's order.

MARSH INDIA INSURANCE BROKERS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusM/S ATKINS SPECIAL RISKS LTD. & ORS.

2023 INSC 29324 March 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Marsh India Insurance Brokers Pvt Ltd appealed against a Securities Appellate Tribunal order that set aside the IRDA’s dismissal of a complaint by Atkins Special Risks Ltd alleging that Marsh paid a bribe to Jagdish Gupta, Chairman of Jagson International Ltd, to obtain a re‑insurance brokerage contract. The Tribunal h

M/S. KALAMANI TEX & ANRversusP. BALASUBRAMANIAN M.A. NO. 364 OF 2021 IN

[2021] 1 S.C.R. 67924 February 2021Disposed off

The Supreme Court, hearing Criminal Appeal No. 123 of 2021 (M/A No. 364 of 2021), reviewed its earlier direction dated 10 February 2021 to transfer Rs. 11,20,000 to the respondent along with accrued interest. It was discovered that the sum was held in a non‑interest‑earning account with UCO Bank, making the payment of

THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.versusKAMLESH RANI BHATLA

2023 INSC 28223 March 2023Dismissed

Kamlesh Rani Bhatla, an Assistant Teacher, resigned on 22 March 2012 to contest a municipal election; her resignation was accepted on 29 March 2012. After losing the election, she applied on 21 April 2012 to withdraw her resignation, but the application remained pending for years. She filed a writ petition, and the Del

M/S PURI INVESTMENTSversusM/S YOUNG FRIENDS AND CO. & ORS.

2022 INSC 22523 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Puri Investments, the landlord, filed an eviction suit under Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alleging that the tenant, M/s Young Friends & Co., had sub-let portions of the shop to three medical practitioners without the landlord's consent. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition, but the Appellate

XXXversusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2021 INSC 77022 November 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant challenged an FIR filed by the respondent by filing a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court. The High Court, on 20 April 2021, quashed the FIR by a detailed reasoned order. On 28 April 2021, the same High Court, acting suo moto, recalled its earlier order. The app

PATEL ENGINEERING LTD.versusNORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. (NEEPCO)

2020 INSC 40322 May 2020Dismissed

Patel Engineering Ltd. challenged three arbitral awards dated 29‑03‑2016 concerning payment for extra lead under a contract with North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd. (NEEPCO). NEEPCO filed applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; the Additional Deputy Commissioner upheld the

MAHARASHTRA SEAMLESS LIMITEDversusPADMANABHAN VENKATESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 7622 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) involving United Seamless Tubular Private Ltd., where the successful resolution applicant, Maharashtra Seamless Ltd. (MSL), had offered an upfront payment of Rs. 477 crore, which was below the average liquidation value of Rs. 597.54 crore deter

SURESH SRIVASTAVA & ORS.versusSUNDEEP BHUTORIA

2022 INSC 32121 March 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a civil appeal challenging a Delhi High Court order that had registered a matter as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the Indian Federation of United Nations Association. The High Court, in paragraph 17 of its order, allowed the respondent, who had originally brought facts befo

RE: VIJAY KURLE & ORS.versus.

2022 INSC 129821 March 2022Case Allowed

In a Suo Motu Contempt Petition (CRL.) No. 2 of 2019, the Supreme Court observed a typographical error in paragraph 7 of its judgment dated 27-04-2020, where it incorrectly quoted "92) of Article 142" instead of the correct "(2) of Article 142". A miscellaneous application (M.A. No. 486 of 2022) was filed seeking a cor

TARUN KUMARversusASSISTANT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2023 INSC 100620 November 2023Dismissed

The appellant, a Vice President of Purchases at Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd., was arrested under the fourth supplementary complaint filed under Sections 44 and 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for alleged money‑laundering offences linked to a bank fraud investigated under the Prevention of Corruption

YASHITA SAHUversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2020 INSC 5820 January 2020

The Supreme Court examined a dispute where a mother, Yashita Sahu, took her US‑born daughter to India in violation of a consent order of the Norfolk Juvenile Court, which had granted shared parenting. The father filed a writ of habeas corpus in the Rajasthan High Court seeking the child's return, and the High Court ord

TOTTEMPUDI SALALITHversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 92318 October 2023Dismissed

The appellant, managing director of Totem Infrastructure Ltd., challenged the admission of a Section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) application filed by State Bank of India (SBI) before the NCLT, arguing that the claim was barred by limitation and the doctrine of election. The banks had earlier obtained three r

BHUPINDER SINGHversusJOGINDER SINGH (D) BY LRS. & ORS.

2019 INSC 105318 September 2019Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking a scheme for the management of a Gurudwara, alleging it to be a public place of worship. The appellant‑defendant contended that the Gurudwara was private property owned by his father, a Mohtmim, and argued that the suit was not maintain

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.versusADANI POWER RAJASTHAN LTD. & ANR.

2024 INSC 21318 March 2024Dismissed

Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. filed a miscellaneous application seeking a direction that the Rajasthan distribution companies pay a late payment surcharge of Rs.1376.35 crore, alleging that the Supreme Court's earlier judgment on the matter was incomplete. The application was filed after the main appeals (Civil Appeals No

STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERSversusBINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 4418 January 2024Dismissed

The State of Assam and its officials challenged the validity of Rule 63(iii) of the Assam Police Manual, which designates the Deputy Commissioner as the reporting authority for Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (APARs) of District Superintendents of Police (SPs). The respondent

R SUNDARAMversusTHE TAMIL NADU STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE & ORS.

2023 INSC 24917 March 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a clerk‑cum‑shroff appointed on a Scheduled Tribe community certificate, served 38 years before receiving a cessation order two days before retirement, alleging his certificate was false and withholding all post‑retirement benefits except PF. The scrutiny committee’s verification took 19 years, during wh

SHRIRANG YADAVRAO WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2019 INSC 103316 September 2019Dismissed

The appellant, a Judicial Magistrate, was suspended and later dismissed for passing orders favoring the clients and relatives of a lady lawyer with whom he had a close personal relationship. The Supreme Court examined whether such conduct, deemed a form of non‑monetary gratification, justified dismissal under Maharasht

SURENDRA PRASAD MISHRAversusSMT. RAMAWATI AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 91116 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

A claim petition before a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) was filed with a vakalatnama signed by two advocates, Mr. R.M. Singh and Mr. D.K. Saxena. After a settlement, the MACT held that the compromise could be filed only through Mr. Singh because of a fee dispute, effectively rejecting the filing by Mr. Saxena.

NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.

2024 INSC 4116 January 2024Matter referred to larger bench

The former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, N. Chandrababu Naidu, was added as accused No.37 in FIR No.29/2021 alleging massive misappropriation of funds related to skill development projects, invoking offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the IPC. He sought quashing of the FIR and the remand order

SUSHMA SHIVKUMAR DAGA & ANR.versusMADHURKUMAR RAMKRISHNAJI BAJAJ & ORS

2023 INSC 108115 December 2023Dismissed

The appellants, heirs of the late Shivkumar Daga, filed a civil suit seeking declaration that a conveyance deed of 17‑12‑2019 and several development agreements were void. The respondents moved a Section 8 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, relying on arbitration clauses in two earlier Tripar

SAYUNKTA SANGARSH SAMITI & ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2023 INSC 108015 December 2023Dismissed

The case concerned a slum rehabilitation project in Lower Parel, Mumbai, where a developer and a minority group of hutment dwellers (Sayunkta Sangharsh Samiti) entered into a private Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to allocate flats in towers D, E and F exclusively to the society members, bypassing the Slum Rehabilit

SAUMYA CHAURASIAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2023 INSC 107314 December 2023Dismissed

The appellant, Saumya Chaurasia, a Deputy Secretary in the Chhattisgarh Chief Minister’s Office, was arrested in connection with an extortion‑linked money‑laundering case investigated by the Enforcement Directorate. She sought bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., but the High Court rejected her application, prompting

CHEN KHOI KUIversusLIANG MIAO SHENG & ORS.

2023 INSC 82713 September 2023Disposed off

The dispute concerned the registration of Pei May Chinese High School as a separate society under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961. The Registrar granted registration in 2010, but the Chinese Tannery Owners’ Association alleged forged signatures and suppression of material facts and sought cancellation,

DEVESH SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2023 INSC 70411 August 2023Dismissed

The National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) issued a notification on 28 June 2018 that treated a B.Ed. degree as an essential qualification for appointment as a primary school teacher (Level‑1). This was challenged by B.Ed. candidates and by candidates holding a Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) who argu

JEETU KHATIKversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2022 INSC 41411 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Jeetu Khatik, was convicted by a trial court for kidnapping a nine‑year‑old girl and outraging her modesty, under IPC sections 363 and 354 and POCSO Act section 8, and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment to run concurrently. He applied for suspension of the execution of his sentence during the pen

BGS SGS SOMA JVversusNHPC LTD.

2019 INSC 134910 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners BGS SGS SOMA JV sought to enforce an arbitral award concerning a hydro‑electric project, while the respondent NHPC Ltd filed a Section 34 petition in the Faridabad court to set aside the award. The petitioners applied under Section 151 CPC to have the petition returned to the appropriate court, and the

SURESH G. RAMNANIversusAURELIA ANA DE PIEDADE MIRANDA @ ARIYA ALVARES (DEAD THR. LRS) & ORS.

2022 INSC 119610 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant sought a review of a High Court order and filed a miscellaneous application requesting that the review be heard by Justice G.S. Patel, who had earlier decided the matter. The respondent opposed, arguing that under Chapter XXX Rule 3(1) of the Bombay High Court Rules, the review should be placed before the

DR. NIRMAL SINGH PANESARversusMRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR @ AJINDER KAUR PANESAR

2023 INSC 89610 October 2023Dismissed

The appellant, an 89‑year‑old retired Air Force officer, filed for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The District Court granted the decree, but the High Court reversed it, holding that the appellant failed to prove either ground. The

PURAN MALversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

2022 INSC 29710 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the State of Haryana, challenged the High Court's order granting bail to Mahesh Kumar, accused of murder under Section 302 IPC, on the ground that the High Court failed to provide cogent reasons despite two prior bail rejections by the Trial Court. The Supreme Court examined the principles governing bail

JAIPUR ZILA DUGDH UTPADAK SAHKARI SANGH LIMITED & ORS.versusM/S AJAY SALES & SUPPLIERS

2021 INSC 4659 September 2021Dismissed

The petitioners, Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. and others, entered into a distributorship agreement with the respondent, M/s Ajay Sales & Suppliers, which contained an arbitration clause appointing the Sangh's Chairman as sole arbitrator. The respondent later approached the High Court under Section 11 of

M/S RAJCO STEEL ENTERPRISESversusKAVITA SARAFF AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 2889 April 2024Dismissed

M/S Rajco Steel Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed complaints alleging that four cheques issued by respondent No.1 were dishonoured for insufficient funds and were purportedly issued in discharge of a debt owed to the firm. The trial court convicted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

KIZHAKKE VATTAKANDIYIL MADHAVAN (DEAD) THR. LRS.versusTHIYYURKUNNATH MEETHAL JANAKI AND ORS

2024 INSC 2879 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a suit for partition of a property claimed by a son born of a widow’s second marriage, who sought his share through his mother, the widow. The widow had remarried after the death of her first husband, and the plaintiff relied on a series of lease and assignment deeds executed in 1910 and 1925 to esta

KARIKHO KRIversusNUNEY TAYANG AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 2899 April 2024Disposed off

In the 2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, independent candidate Karikho Kri was elected from Tezu (ST) constituency. Nuney Tayang challenged the election, alleging that Kri failed to disclose three vehicles, a no‑dues certificate for government accommodation, and municipal/property tax liabilities, t

SMT. NAJMUNISHAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 2909 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The prosecution alleged that secret information received by an intelligence officer indicated that Accused No.4 would transport narcotics in an auto‑rickshaw, leading to a raid in which 1.45 kg of charas was seized from the vehicle and, subsequently, 2.098 kg was recovered from the house of Accused No.4 where Accused N

THE VVF LTD. EMPLOYEES UNIONversusM/S. VVF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

2024 INSC 2939 April 2024Disposed off

The VVF Ltd. Employees Union filed a charter of demand in 2008 seeking wage revisions and various allowances for 146 workmen employed at VVF India Ltd.'s Sewree and Sion units. The Industrial Tribunal awarded relief on several demands but rejected the union's claims for pay‑scale revision, adjustments, and dearness all

VIPIN SAHNI AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2024 INSC 2848 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who founded a society that obtained AICTE approvals for several business schools, were charged under Sections 420 and 120B IPC for allegedly cheating the AICTE by concealing that the leased land was mortgaged. After a Special Judicial Magistrate discharged them, the CBI approached the Allahabad High Cou

KARIM UDDIN BARBHUIYAversusAMINUL HAQUE LASKAR & ORS.

2024 INSC 2828 April 2024Case Allowed

The appellant, Karim Uddin Barbhuiya, contested the dismissal of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of an election petition filed by Aminul Haque Laskar alleging false statements in the appellant's nomination affidavit and improper acceptance of his nomination. The Supreme Court examined whet

PUNJAB & SIND BANKversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2023 INSC 10797 December 2023Dismissed

Punjab & Sind Bank appealed against a High Court order that upheld the State of Punjab's claim of priority over tax dues under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, which it alleged superseded the bank's charge on the borrower’s immovable property. The State asserted a first charge under Section 35 of the 2005 Act for

SANJAY KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2021 INSC 2927 May 2021Directions issued

The appellant, Sanjay Kumar Rai, was charged under Sections 504 and 506 IPC for allegedly threatening a journalist and sought discharge under Section 239 CrPC, claiming the investigation was biased and the complainant’s testimony unreliable. The Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected the discharge application, and the High

NARENDRA HIRAWAT AND CO.versusSHOLAY MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 2687 March 2022Directions issued

The appellant, Narendra Hirawat & Co. (NHC), entered into film‑licence agreements with Sholay Media Entertainment (SME) for a total consideration of Rs 20 crore, later amended by addenda and a Deed of Settlement dated 03‑12‑2018 requiring NHC to pay Rs 8.71 crore in four tranches. Disputes arose over the issuance of in

YERUVA SAYIREDDYversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.

2022 INSC 12977 March 2022Disposed off

The appellant, convicted of murder under IPC s.302, appealed his conviction and sentence. While the appeal was pending, he died in prison after about twelve years. Section 394 of the Cr.P.C. provides that an appeal abates on the death of the appellant unless a near relative applies within thirty days for continuance. N

RAJNISH KUMAR RAIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2023 INSC 8626 September 2023Dismissed

Petitioner Rajnish Kumar Rai, who had instituted a proceeding before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Hyderabad, sought its transfer to the CAT Ahmedabad bench. The Principal Bench of CAT Delhi rejected the transfer application, prompting the petitioner to challenge the order before the Gujarat High Court unde

SHOMA KANTI SENversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2024 INSC 2695 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Shoma Kanti Sen was arrested in June 2018 in connection with the Elgar Parishad event and charged under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). The High Court dismissed her bail application, directing her to approach the trial court, after the investigation was transferred to th

MAN SINGHversusSHAMIM AHMED (DEAD) THR. LRS

2023 INSC 3235 April 2023Dismissed

Man Singh, a tenant of a shop in Saharanpur, paid a rent of Rs.250 per month. When the landlord refused to accept the rent, the tenant deposited the rent in the court under Section 30 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The landlord later served a notice demanding

MURALIversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2021 INSC 25 January 2021Case Partly allowed

The appellants Murali and Rajavelu were convicted for assaulting a victim during a volleyball match, with Murali found guilty under IPC s.324 and s.341 and Rajavelu under s.307 and s.341, receiving three months and five years of rigorous imprisonment respectively. Both appealed their convictions, and later sought to im

HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED (H.Z.L.)versusAJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

2019 INSC 13194 December 2019Disposed off

Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) operates four units and a captive power plant, and entered into open‑access agreements with Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd (AVVNL) for wheeling power to three of its units. A dispute arose over unscheduled interchange (UI) charges under clauses 8 and 9 of the agreements. The Rajasthan Electr

STATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICEversusS. SUBBEGOWDA

2023 INSC 6693 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police appealed against the Karnataka High Court’s order that discharged S. Subbegowda, an executive engineer, from charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondent had faced a charge of amassing disproportionate wealth and the prosecution had examined 17 witnesses a

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusJAHANGIR BYRAMJI JEEJEEBHOY (D) THROUGH HIS LR

2024 INSC 2623 April 2024Dismissed

The Union of India filed a civil appeal seeking restoration of a writ petition that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution in 2006, but the application for restoration was filed after a delay of 12 years and 158 days. The High Court declined to condone this delay, prompting the Union to challenge the order before the S

UNION OF INDIAversusKRISHNA MODI & ANR.

2022 INSC 1443 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a claim by Krishna Modi for a pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980. He alleged he was underground for eight months during the 1942 freedom movement, filing the claim on 27 December 1982, more than twenty years after the event. The High Court had allowed the pension

MOHIDEEN ABDUL KHADAR (DEAD)THROUGH LRS.versusRAHMATH BEEVI (D) THR. HER LRS. AND ORS.

2023 INSC 9691 November 2023Dismissed

The petitioners, legatees of the deceased Mohideen Abdul Khadar, challenged a Madras High Court judgment that upheld the title and possession of Rahmath Beevi over a second scheduled property measuring 15 × 18 feet. The dispute arose from earlier suits where Mohideen claimed title to a first scheduled property and soug

SATISH UKEYversusDEVENDRA GANGADHARRAO FADNAVIS AND ANR.

2019 INSC 11031 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Satish Ukey filed a criminal complaint under Section 125-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 alleging that MLA Devendra Fadnavis concealed two criminal cases in his Form‑26 affidavit, where cognizance had been taken by the courts. The trial court dismissed the complaint, a Sessions Court remanded it for fre

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusSANJEEV BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

2022 INSC 8961 September 2022Dismissed

The appellant (LIC) challenged the High Court’s order allowing the respondents (Sanjeev Builders and another) to amend their plaint in a suit for specific performance, seeking a higher quantum of damages. The appellant argued that the amendment was barred by Order II Rule 2 of the CPC and the doctrine of constructive r

SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2024 INSC 971 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the selection process for District Judge posts in Jharkhand where the High Court, via a Full Court resolution, introduced a 50% aggregate marks requirement after candidates' performances were already assessed. Petitioners challenged this alteration, arguing it violated the 2001 Rules, the 201

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search