Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

2025 judgments · newest first · showing 1801–2000

Chunnu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant Chunnu Yadav filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4532 of 2025 challenging an order of the Special Court under the POCSO Act. The appellant's counsel sought to convert the appeal into a criminal miscellaneous proceeding, citing a prior decision (Cr. Misc. No.52792 of 2019) that bail orders …

Md. Saddam @ ImamuddinversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Saddam @ Imamuddin, was charged with abduction and attempted rape under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, tried to abduct a 20‑year‑old woman for marriage and attempted to rape her, but the villagers intervened and the …

Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, a driver of a pick‑up van, was arrested forty days after a robbery in which four unknown miscreants looted the vehicle and two mobile phones. The FIR named only unknown persons, but the petitioner was implicated and has been in judicial custody since 23 July 2025. He …

Md Shaif @ saifversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Shaif, was charged under Section 64 of the BNS, 2023, for alleged sexual intercourse on a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and the informant had a physical relationship, which ended with the petitioner’s parents assaulting the informant. The …

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Yadav petitioned for regular bail in a case registered under Section 70(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging rape of a minor. The prosecution alleged that six accused, including the petitioner, had raped the minor, based on a statement …

Vivek Sahni @ Vivake SahniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vivek Sahni applied for bail in a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act, where 2 kg of charas, mobile phones and cash were seized from a four‑wheeler in which he was allegedly present. The petitioner claimed he was neither the owner nor the …

Shashi Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shashi Kumar Singh applied for bail in a case registered under Section 414 IPC and Sections 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act, where a search of a four‑wheeler yielded 2 kg of charas, mobile phones and cash, and the petitioner was found seated in the vehicle. The petitioner contended that he …

Md. Astak Ahmad @ Md. Astak Alam @ Furfur @ Md AstakversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Astak Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) after a bag containing cash and documents was stolen. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but during investigation a co-accused, Mantajir Alam, gave a confessional statement that implicated the petitioner, …

Shammi KapoorversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shammi Kapoor was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 575 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Kapoor and co‑accused attempted to …

Ranjeet MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Mahto, was arrested in connection with an alleged assault on an informant involving a lathi, iron rod and daab, leading to a head injury. He faced charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34. The petitioner contended that the FIR was vague, the injury …

Dilkhush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S for alleged participation in a mob assault on an informant with an iron rod. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and that no overt act could be …

Kalpana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Kalpana Devi and Nirmal Kumar, were arrested in connection with a Banmankhi police case involving a small quantity of smack, alleged under Sections 8(C) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The police recovered the narcotic from co‑accused persons, whose statements implicated the petitioners, …

Satrudhan Sahni @ Shatrudhan SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Satrudhan Sahni, applied for regular bail in a case registered under section 309(4) of the B.N.S., alleging that he was not responsible for the alleged theft of cash and ATM cards. The prosecution alleged that the informant was robbed of cash and ATM cards after being taken in a …

Naim MiaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners sought modification of an anticipatory bail order dated 04-11-2025 which required them to surrender within six weeks. Due to clerical errors in the recorded father's names of appellant No.6 and No.9, they were unable to comply. The petition argued that the errors needed correction …

Chhotu Kumar Singh @ Dablu Kumar Singh @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar Singh, was arrested for alleged possession of 100 bottles of cough linctus containing codeine and charged under Sections 21(c), 22(c) and 25 of the NDPS Act. He contended that the seized preparation contained less than 2.5% codeine, falling within the exemption notified …

Lalo Kumar @ Lalo MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lalo Kumar (also known as Lalo Mahto) was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Arms Act for alleged possession and sale of illegal firearms and related items. The prosecution alleged that weapons were recovered from the house of a co-accused and that a confessional statement …

Raju Prasad Kushwaha @ Raju PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raju Prasad Kushwaha, was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for possession of 20 grams of Tramadol tablets and 0.4 grams of Nitrezipam, quantities below the commercial and small quantity thresholds respectively. He applied for regular bail, asserting innocence, …

Shekhar Das @ Shekhar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shekhar Das, a nephew of the deceased Poonam Kumari, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was subjected to dowry cruelty and was murdered by her in‑laws on 23 July 2025. The petitioner …

Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mithlesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged seizure of 35.04 grams of a narcotic substance from a bamboo clamp and charged under sections 8(c), 21(b) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act. He filed a petition for regular bail, contending that he had no possession, that the seizure was illegal …

Prakash Kumar @ Omprakash Kumar @ OmprakashversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. alleging assault with an iron rod, resulting in grievous injuries and theft of Rs.30,000. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, participated in the assault, while …

Yogendra RautversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Yogendra Raut was arrested in a case under the NDPS Act where 107.80 kg of ganja was seized from a scorpio vehicle that had met with an accident while attempting to flee. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the contraband, that the charge‑sheet was filed without the forensic …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and three live cartridges. The prosecution alleged that the weapon and ammunition were recovered from his possession, …

ARJUN PATELversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Arjun Patel, sought regular bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34, alleging that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution alleged that Patel assaulted the informant’s son with a knife blow to the abdomen and kidney after demanding payment of …

Raja Nayak @ Rohit Kumar NayakversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raja Nayak, was arrested after police seized 67 bottles of cough syrups (Korcof, Onerex, Wixdin) containing codeine from a gumti, and he was charged under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act. He contended that the syrups contained only 0.2% codeine, well below the 2.5% threshold …

Monu Kumar Singh @ Monu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Monu Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case involving 2.7 kg of charas and a loaded pistol, charged under IPC s.414, several provisions of the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. He has been in judicial custody since 21 March 2024, and no charge has yet been framed. The petitioner sought regular …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vikash Kumar, an employee of CMS Info System Ltd., was charged under sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 303(2) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly transporting Rs 20 lakh in a Swift Dzire car to load cash at a State Bank of India ATM in Gandhi Maidan. The prosecution alleged that he and …

Sumit Kumar @ RahulversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar (also known as Rahul), was charged under sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of an informant's husband. The prosecution's case rests solely on the confessional statement of co‑accused Vivek Kumar, …

Sandeep sahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Sah, was charged under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged human trafficking, involving a fake Instagram ID used to lure the victim to a dance company. He had previously applied for bail, which was rejected on 26-03-2025 with a direction that he could renew the …

Sahendra PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sahendra Pandey was arrested in connection with an assault on an informant, alleged to involve both a firearm and a sharp weapon, under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was ante‑dated, that there were inconsistencies …

Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder investigation where a co‑accused’s confessional statement implicated him for concealing a weapon used in the crime. The prosecution alleged his involvement under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 54, 351(3) of the Bihar Narcotic …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikram Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Information Technology Act, including fraud, threats and illegal access. The prosecution alleged that the accused were operating from …

Karan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Karan Singh was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms under IPC Sections 302, 120B/34 and Arms Act Section 27. His earlier bail petition was rejected, with a direction that he could renew after six months if the trial was not concluded. The petitioner now sought …

Arvind Sharma @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Arvind Sharma, sought regular bail in a case (Gamhariya P.S. Case No. 202 of 2024) where he is accused under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife, Karo Kumari, who was found throttled. The prosecution presented a post‑mortem report …

Sandeep Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Das, was charged under sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder-related offence. He applied for regular bail after an earlier bail application was rejected on the ground that the trial was ongoing. The High Court noted that the trial was at its final …

Munna Sah @ Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Dinanath Sah, were charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for assaulting individuals during a panchayat meeting. They applied for regular bail, arguing they have no prior criminal record and that three prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. The State …

Dinanath SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Dinanath Sah, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for assaulting individuals during a panchayat dispute. They applied for regular bail, having been in custody since August‑September 2024, and argued they had no prior criminal …

Shiv Shankar Prasad @ ChandanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shiv Shankar Prasad @ Chandan was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 61(2) and 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act) where the prosecution alleged a conspiracy and that Hari Shankar shot Surendra Singh, the informant’s brother. The petitioner contended that the FIR …

Suman Kumar SudhakarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar Sudhakar, sought bail in a case (Gidhaur PS Case No. 215 of 2025) alleging possession of counterfeit currency under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution argued that the petitioner was caught with four counterfeit Rs. 500 notes after a …

Santosh Kumar Chaudhary @ Santosh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a violent incident involving the burning of vehicles and assault on workers during the construction of a railway bridge, alleged to have been orchestrated by a group of extremists. The prosecution listed him among 63 accused persons and charged …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anand Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged theft of a mobile phone and charged under section 304 of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement by co‑accused Vishal Kumar, who named the petitioner, but no material was recovered from the petitioner’s possession. …

Amar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amar Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery‑assault case (Pandarak P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he participated in a gang assault, theft of cash and cards, and illegal …

Sanjiv Kumar Mahto @ Sanjeev MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar Mahto, applied for bail in a Special NDPS case (No. 70 of 2025) arising from a seizure of 50.63 grams of cannabis resin recovered from co‑accused Md Sanowar and Md Sahwaj Alam, who identified the petitioner. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the …

Bilendra Kumar @ Birendra Kumar @ Bilendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bilendra Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 453 of 2024 for an alleged offence under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a group of miscreants who robbed an informant returning from a marriage ceremony. …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rahul Kumar was arrested in a case of stolen bicycles registered under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he was found with a seized bike but could not produce any documents for it, while the petitioner claimed he was an innocent passer‑by and …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ankit Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c), 17(c) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act, with the charge sheet filed under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and cognizance taken under Section 311 of the same Act. The prosecution's case relied on contraband recovered …

Chhotelal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Chhotelal Kumar, was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and several sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged participation in a violent attack on a Dalit settlement. The trial court refused bail, prompting an appeal …

Guddu GiriversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Giri appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case (Pupri PS Case No. 434 of 2024) where the deceased was the son of an informant. The prosecution relied on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, a witness’s "last‑seen" testimony, and alleged that the appellant was present at the …

Sandeep Yadav @ Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sandeep Yadav, was charged under multiple provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Offences) Act for allegedly firing at a school‑going complainant. The trial court rejected his bail application, relying on the charges and the State’s …

Mahesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahesh Mandal appealed against the refusal of bail granted by the ADJ Special Court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a murder case where the complainant's husband was allegedly shot on Mandal's orders. The prosecution alleged that Mandal ordered the firing that …

Indrajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Indrajit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 1,047 grams of heroin from a swift car and charged under sections 8(c), 21(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He contended that he was merely a passenger, not the owner or driver, and had no prior criminal record, having been …

Suresh SawversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suresh Saw, was arrested for alleged offences under sections 126(2), 127(2) and 76 of the B.N.S. and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, accused of entering a house at night and teasing the minor daughter of the informant. The victim’s statement was recorded under sections 180 and …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amit Kumar was arrested during a police raid on a house in Patna after a Facebook advertisement offering loans through SBI YONO was traced to a suspicious mobile number. He was charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information …

Bipin Kumar @ Vipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, child marriage and offences under the POCSO Act. The prosecution claimed the petitioner abducted the informant’s daughter, who was later found to have allegedly married him and was under the age of consent. The …

Md. Shabir @ Raja @ Md. SabbirversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Shabir, was arrested for possession of 120 bottles of Onerex cough syrup containing 0.2% codeine and charged under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. He sought bail, arguing that the seizure was not conducted per Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and that the codeine …

Hasan Ansari @ Hasana Ansari @ Md. HasanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Hasan Ansari, was arrested in connection with Bahadurganj Police Station Case No.143 of 2011, which alleged offences under Sections 365, 366, 372 and 498/34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the alleged abduction of a complainant’s wife by Md. Mojib. The petitioner contended that …

Bhola ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bhola Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and eight live cartridges. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, asserted that nothing was recovered from his possession, and highlighted …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivam Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after a pistol was allegedly recovered from his possession. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted that no weapon was seized from him, and highlighted procedural violations, including the failure …

Jaleshwar MathoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jaleshwar Matho, father‑in‑law of the deceased woman, was arrested in a dowry‑death case under sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands and was killed, implicating the petitioner. The petitioner …

Mohhamad Miyan @ Mohhamad HussainversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mohhamad Miyan was arrested in connection with a case (PS Malahi Case No. 274 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 347(1) of the B.N.S., primarily for possession of a stolen bike whose number plates had been altered. The prosecution claimed the bike was …

Dilip Sahani @ Nitesh Ji @ Dilip Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip Sahani, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 121, 121(a), 120(b)), the Arms Act, the Explosive Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

Shakuntala DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shakuntala Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased Juli Kumari, applied for regular bail in a criminal case under sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging she had no role in the alleged dowry‑related cruelty and murder of Juli Kumari. The prosecution alleged that Juli Kumari was married in 2019, …

Md. Israil @ Md. EsrylversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Israil, was arrested in connection with an alleged theft of five cows belonging to an informant, purportedly taken in a blue Magic van. The prosecution claimed the petitioner used the van to transport the stolen cattle, while the petitioner asserted that the van belonged to …

Ranjan Kumar @ Ravinder yadav @ Ravinder KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 308(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleged to have been involved with armed miscreants demanding a levy. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that his name appeared only in the confessional …

Ranjan Kumar @ Ravindra yadav @ Ravinder KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought bail for offences under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged extortion attempt on a road construction site. The prosecution alleged that armed men threatened the workers and demanded a levy, leading to the filing of an FIR against …

Munna Khan @ T. T. @ Munna Mian @ Mannu KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Munna Khan was arrested in connection with PS‑Pathkhauli Case No.213 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 143, 61(2)(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, with the prosecution alleging his participation in human trafficking. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, noting the …

Habib SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Habib Sah was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of Najma Khatoon, the aunt of an informant, following an assault by Azad Sah. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, highlighted a 12‑day delay in filing the FIR, and pointed out that a prior …

Sahdev SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sahdev Singh, sought bail in a case registered in 2008 under Sections 498(A), 304(B), 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging dowry‑related cruelty and murder of Babita Kumari. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed and her body cremated, implicating …

Rajesh Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court considered an application for bail filed by Rajesh Kumar Das, who was arrested under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for allegedly dealing in prohibited food grains. The prosecution alleged that his shop, though closed at the time of inspection, was a hub for storing …

Punam DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Punam Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested in a dowry‑death case (Piro PS Case No. 266 of 2025) where the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. The prosecution alleged cruelty and dowry demand leading to the victim's death, charging the petitioner under …

Kunal Kumar @ CheluversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kunal Kumar was arrested for an alleged armed assault and attempted robbery at Shri Ram Finance Limited, where five miscreants tried to obtain a locker key, vandalised the office and locked employees in a toilet. The prosecution charged him under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner …

Parvez AhmedversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Parvez Ahmed was arrested in connection with offences under sections 319(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and section 66(c) of the Information Technology Act after two mobile phones recovered from him allegedly contained QR codes and communications with a person …

Mithilesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he, along with two others, transported sixteen gunny bags of urea on a bike and four bicycles, an offence punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The petitioner contended that the prosecution's …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with NDNDPS Case No. 373 of 2025 for alleged possession of 6.020 kg of ganja seized outside his house’s veranda. He contended that the drugs were not in his possession, the seizure was made from a public area, and the police failed to comply …

Varun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Varun Kumar was arrested in connection with a bike‑snatching and assault case alleged under sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but a co‑accused, Kundan Kumar, gave a confessional statement implicating the petitioner. No material was recovered from Varun Kumar and …

Sonu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sonu Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with the alleged possession of a country‑made pistol and a live cartridge, and was charged under the Arms Act, the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the NDPS Act. The petitioner sought regular bail, contending that the alleged seizure was not made from his …

Binod Mukhiya @ Binod MukhiaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Binod Mukhiya, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged murder of Raj Kumari Devi. The prosecution alleged that the deceased's husband, Nitish Mukhiya, had threatened to kill her if she did not marry his …

Sheela Devi @ Shila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sheela Devi and Puja Kumari, sought regular bail in a murder case (Case No. 222 of 2025) where the deceased, Shankar Kumar, was found dead by drowning. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were involved in a dispute over an alleged illicit relationship and that they …

Babu SahebversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Babu Saheb, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 317(5), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the B.N.S., alleged to involve a stolen bike identified through a handheld device. He contended that he had no involvement, could not produce bike documents, and that the …

Lalu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was arrested on 30 September 2025 for alleged possession of a loaded country‑made pistol and a live cartridge, offences punishable under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed the items were recovered from his pocket during a night patrol, …

Dukhi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dukhi Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, based on the allegation that co‑accused stored stolen bikes and mobiles at his house. The prosecution’s case relied on the confessional statements of the co‑accused, while …

Ali Mohammad AshrafversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Ali Mohammad Ashraf applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)A and 269(3) of the Arms Act, alleging that a pistol, 27 live cartridges and a magazine were seized from his bag. The prosecution claimed the weapons belonged to the petitioner, while his counsel …

Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, a jeweller, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleged to have purchased stolen gold. He applied for regular bail, contending that he acted in good faith to meet a bona‑fide customer’s need and that the …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Raju Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 222 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 96, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The informant's 17½‑year‑old daughter was reported missing but was later recovered and, under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., …

Dharmendra Kumar @ MahiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, abduction of a minor for marriage and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 363, 366A and 506. The prosecution claimed the minor daughter of the informant was kidnapped during a morning walk. The …

Raju Ray @ Raju Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Raju Ray, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96, 140(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging kidnapping of the informant's minor son and a forced marriage. The victim, after being rescued, gave a statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. describing the alleged …

Sharwan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sharwan Yadav, the father of the alleged kidnapper Ritik Yadav, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging kidnapping of a minor for marriage. The prosecution argued that the petitioner was implicated merely because of his relationship to …

Mohan Chaudhary @ Subhash Chaudhary @ Subhash KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mohan Chaudhary was charged under IPC sections 363 and 366(A) for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant with the intent of marriage. The victim was later recovered and gave a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., indicating she had voluntarily met the petitioner, was taken to …

Mahendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahendra Manjhi was arrested in connection with a dacoity case (IPC Sec. 395) and an additional charge of concealing stolen property (IPC Sec. 412). The FIR named unknown persons, but during investigation a co‑accused, Guddu Manjhi, gave a confessional statement implicating the petitioner. No …

Vinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vinay Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of Rs.1,20,000 and petrol theft under Section 379 IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants and that only a confessional statement by another accused, Dhiraj Kumar, implicated him, with no material recovered from his …

Md. Bablu Alam @ Bablu AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Bablu Alam, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2) and 309(4) of the Bihar Penal Code for the alleged theft of a Scorpio car. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants, after stopping the informant, stole the vehicle at knife‑point. The petitioner …

Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who was allegedly killed by hanging following a dowry dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and his family hanged the deceased, while the defence argued that the death was a suicide, supported by the …

PINTU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the BNS, 2023, alleging robbery of Rs. 25,44,275 from Axis Bank, Barbigha. The prosecution’s case was based on a FIR against unknown persons and confessional statements of co‑accused Ghanshyam Bharti and …

Jay Prakash Ray @ Chhotaka @ Jay Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jay Prakash Ray, was accused under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of an informant's father, based largely on the informant's suspicion and a 'last seen' theory. The FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, and the trial has been pending …

Rahul SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rahul Singh was arrested in a robbery case (IPC s.395) where the FIR named unknown miscreants. During investigation, co‑accused Rana Kumar gave a confessional statement that implicated the petitioner, although no material was recovered from him. The petitioner, who has been in judicial …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he, along with others, abducted a minor girl, assaulted her, and uploaded a video of the assault on social media, violating several provisions of the B.N.S., POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and the I.T. Act. The petitioner contended that he was …

BALIRAM SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Baliram Singh, Jai Ram Singh and Binod Singh, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and the Arms Act for allegedly being armed with country‑made pistols and a sword and for assaulting an informant. The prosecution alleged they fired weapons …

Rajeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rajeev Kumar was charged under Sections 191(2), 190, 329(3), 115(2) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at the husband of an informant during a shooting incident. The prosecution alleged that both Rohit Mandan and the petitioner …

Sonu Paswan @ Mithilesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sonu Paswan, was arrested after a police raid on his house recovered a country-made pistol and a live cartridge. He applied for regular bail under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, contending that the seized items were not in his possession and that the seizure violated …

Jitender KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jitender Kumar applied for bail in a case registered as Bind P.S. Case No. 76 of 2025, alleging kidnapping for ransom and possession of a 7.65 mm pistol and live cartridges under Section 140(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that …

Sarfaraj AalamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sarfaraj Aalam was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a confessional statement led to the recovery of a pistol, a live cartridge and a laptop. The petitioner contended that nothing was seized from his possession and that the seizure list was …

Sanjay Kumar @ Lala @ Lalwa @ Sanjay MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving a stolen motorcycle and the recovery of a country-made pistol with live cartridges. He was charged under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, …

Prabhat Kumar @ Prabhat Singh @ Abhishek Kumar @ LitilversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Prabhat Kumar, was arrested in connection with a dance program where firing was carried out, resulting in the death of a female dancer. He sought regular bail for offences under Sections 105 and 238 of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the firing …

Yugal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Yugal Paswan, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 337 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the husband of the informant with lathi and iron rods, following an earlier incident where the informant’s husband, a driver, had negligently trampled …

Akshay Kumar @ Akshay RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Akshay Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 120B, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his son Pankaj Kumar. The prosecution’s case was based largely on the informant’s suspicion that the petitioner was one of seventeen persons …

Pappu Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pappu Yadav, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(2), 3(5) and 61(2) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that Govind was shot by Pravin and Vikash, with further firing on the informant, and that the petitioner was present in a car with …

Suraj BasforversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Suraj Basfor was arrested in connection with the alleged murder of his wife, Babita Kumari, under sections 304(b) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to be a dowry death. The petitioner sought regular bail after his anticipatory bail petition had been rejected, contending that he was innocent, …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sudhir Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged extortion and theft incident where five persons seized a bike, demanded money, and forced a transfer of funds from the informant's mobile. He was charged under sections 308(4), 308(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and has been in judicial custody …

Vivek Kumar @ Vishesh kumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vivek Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged attempt to snatch a bag containing Rs. 14 lakh, during which the informant was shot and injured. The prosecution alleged that Kumar was one of three unknown miscreants on motorcycles, charged under sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S. and …

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rohit Kumar was charged under Sections 310(2) and 126(2) of the BNS for an armed robbery in which a bag containing personal documents and cash was snatched. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that only confessional statements of co‑accused and himself linked him to the crime and that no …

Ravish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ravish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and armed assault on a jewellery showroom, alleged under IPC section 395 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35. The prosecution’s case is based on a FIR naming unknown miscreants and a co‑accused’s confession that implicated …

Renuka @ Renu KodaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Renuka Koda applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 201 and 427 of the IPC, Section ¾ of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, Section 27 of the Arms Act and several sections of the U.A.P. Act, alleging her involvement in a Naxal attack that …

Nandu Kumar @ Nandu GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Nandu Kumar sought bail in a case registered in 2018 under IPC sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 relating to alleged non‑payment of maize and dishonoured cheques. The prosecution alleged he received maize worth Rs. 50,62,506, paid only Rs. 35,46,319 and issued a Rs. 50,000 cheque that …

Md. Azad @ AzadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Azad, was arrested in connection with alleged manufacturing of arms under several provisions of the Arms Act. Police raided a workshop based on a tip, but the accused fled and no weapons were recovered from the petitioner. A local chowkidar’s statement named the petitioner among …

Sanni Shekhar Singh @ Sanni Shekhar @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanni Shekhar Singh, was charged under Sections 80(2), 90(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for the alleged murder of his pregnant wife, Chandani Kumari, who died along with her newborn. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted his wife after a financial dispute, leading to her …

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKKU BABA @ MUKUL BABAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mukesh Kumar was arrested in a police raid based on secret information and charged under sections 310(4), 310(5), 111(2)(b) of the BNS and sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, his name appearing only in the statement of a co‑accused who had …

Binod Kumar @ BilayativersusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Binod Kumar, was arrested in connection with an extortion case (PS Digha Case No. 331 of 2025) and has been in judicial custody since 21 May 2025. The FIR does not name him; the only link is a confessional statement of co‑accused Bheem @ Shatrughan that mentions the petitioner. The …

Pappu Kumar @ Papu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Pappu Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged illegal sand‑mining operation on the Niranjana river, during which police attempting to seize a tractor were attacked with lathis, bricks and stones. The prosecution charged him under sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 111(1), 121(2), 132 and 109 of …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 329(4), 64, 308(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging involvement in a sexual act with a minor and extortion. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with three others, assisted Vicky Kumar in filming a forced …

Lal Bihari YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lal Bihari Yadav was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he entered a woman's house demanding cash for liquor, attempted to molest a minor sister‑in‑law, and committed offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …

Nithish Kumar @ Nitish Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nithish Kumar, was arrested in connection with the murder of an unidentified woman, charged under sections 103(1) and 238 of the B.N.S. The deceased's husband identified the petitioner and the petitioner gave a confessional statement, though no other material evidence was recovered. …

Saurav Kumar @ BuddhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners – Saurav Kumar, Ankit Kumar, Dipu Kumar and Bhola Mistry – were charged under section 309(4) of the B.N.S. for allegedly snatching Rs.75,000 from an informant. The lower court had earlier granted bail to three of them on a mistaken submission that the looted amount was recovered from …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners – Saurav Kumar, Ankit Kumar, Dipu Kumar and Bhola Mistry – were charged under section 309(4) of the B.N.S. for allegedly snatching Rs.75,000 from an informant. The lower court had earlier granted bail to three of them on a mistaken submission that the looted amount was recovered from …

Dipu KumarversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The petitioners Saurav Kumar, Ankit Kumar, Dipu Kumar and Bhola Mistry sought regular bail in a case under section 309(4) of the B.N.S. for allegedly snatching Rs. 75,000 from an informant. The prosecution argued that bail had previously been granted on a mistaken submission regarding the recovery …

Sirajul @ Md. Serajul @ Md. SarajulversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sirajul, was charged under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for a robbery‑homicide in which four unknown miscreants looted a pick‑up van after taking the informant hostage. The FIR named unknown persons, but a confessional statement by co‑accused Md. Anshraj …

Girdhari Kumar @ Girdhari ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Girdhari Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 303(2) and 334(1) of the BNS for alleged theft of temple ornaments. The prosecution alleged that temple ornaments were stolen and that the petitioner was apprehended, gave a confessional statement, and that …

Bhola Mistry @ Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners – Saurav Kumar, Ankit Kumar, Dipu Kumar and Bhola Mistry – were charged under section 309(4) of the B.N.S. for allegedly snatching Rs.75,000 from an informant. The lower court had earlier granted bail to three of them on a mistaken submission that the looted amount was recovered from …

Rohit Kumar @ BillaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Rohit Kumar filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested. Counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application on the ground of the arrest. The Court considered …

Barki MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Barki Marandi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased tribal woman, was arrested in connection with a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. She applied for regular bail, contending that she has a clean antecedent, has been in judicial custody since 19‑04‑2025, and that the …

Shyam Narayan Singh @ Shyam Narain SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Shyam Narayan Singh, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 364, 120-B, 302 and 210 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had completed the prosecution evidence and the accused's Section 313 examination, and was awaiting defence evidence, which the defence had …

POCT ServicesversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

POCT Services filed a civil writ jurisdiction application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The opposite parties were present and did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined whether procedural …

Vipul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vipul Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, alleging that only 10 litres of cough syrup were recovered from his car and that he is innocent. The prosecution argued that the seizure linked him to the …

Vimlesh Kumar @ Vimlesh Kumar VermaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vimlesh Kumar, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1319 of 2024 to its original file. The appeal arose from a 2013 case involving multiple respondents and the State of Bihar. The application was heard before a bench of Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and …

Amrit Kumar @ Nihal Kumar @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amrit Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged defalcation of over Rs 2.68 crore while employed by L&T Finance Company, accused of cheating the company by advancing loans to 41 persons. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and stating that only about Rs 2 lakh was …

Shaiuddin @ Sayoddin @ Shankar Singh @ RahulversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shaiuddin, was arrested by police on the basis of secret information alleging that he was planning to commit offences under the NDPS Act, Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, and a country-made pistol with live cartridges was seized. He contended that he was falsely …

Indrajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Indrajeet Kumar, a licensed arms dealer, was arrested in connection with a railway case involving the recovery of 50 live cartridges from his vehicle. He sought bail for offences under Sections 111 and 318(4) of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms …

Raju Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raju Kumar Prasad was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC s.302) and a criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120B) along with an offence under the Arms Act (s.27). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner’s husband was killed by a co‑accused, Raj Kamal Thakur, who had previously …

Bali Ram Ray @ Bali RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Bali Ram Ray was charged under Sections 341, 324 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly delivering a knife blow to the abdomen of a deceased person, resulting in death. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication, lack of supporting testimony from four trial witnesses, and no …

Hetu KishunversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hetu Kishun, appealed the judgment dated 14‑10‑2025 in F.A. Nos. 322, 323 and 325 of 1994, contending that the award omitted statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act. The petitioner also pointed out that the name of his counsel was incorrectly recorded in the judgment. The …

Ranjeet Kumar @ PradumanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar @ Praduman, was arrested in connection with the disappearance and alleged murder of Raja Kumar, whose body was not recovered but was presumed dead after a missing car and phone call. The prosecution’s case rests primarily on the statement of the petitioner’s sister, …

Vishwanath RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vishwanath Rai, a former ward member, was arrested in connection with alleged misappropriation of Rs. 14,39,500 and incomplete work under the Nal‑Jal‑Yojana, charged under sections 406, 409 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Rai, along with two others, withdrew the …

Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kanhaiya Kumar was arrested in connection with a vehicle snatching during which unknown assailants opened fire, leading to charges under IPC sections 394, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution’s informant and the injured victim identified the petitioner as the shooter, while a co‑accused, …

Ravi Sao @ Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ravi Sao, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 329(4), 75, 76, 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., alleging he was falsely implicated in the death of a woman who was found nude, bleeding, and with a rope around her neck. The prosecution alleged that the …

Suresh Ram @ Shubham Kumar @ TusharversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suresh Ram, sought regular bail in a robbery case under IPC section 392 where an amount of Rs.55,700 was allegedly stolen. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement by co‑accused Jawahar Prasad naming the petitioner and on Call Detail Records showing the petitioner’s …

Krishna Paswan @ Krishn PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Krishna Paswan and Rukmini Devi, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the deceased Rinku Devi, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged murder. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, …

Dhramveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhramveer Kumar, was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1670 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Information Technology Act, including cheating through online gaming apps. The prosecution claimed that a raid on Ranvijay …

Akhilesh Kumar @ Guddu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he had taken Rs 4 lakhs from Kunal Kumar over a land dispute and was involved in a shooting that killed the informant’s brother …

Pawan Yadav @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Pawan Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 645 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleges that the deceased, Rupam Kumari, was subjected to dowry cruelty and was killed by her in‑laws because she opposed her …

Bala Kumar Yadav @ Balaji Kumar @ Balaji Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bala Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which Rs. 5,00,780 and two mobile phones were allegedly snatched. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but a co-accused named Laltu gave a confessional statement implicating the petitioner, although no material was recovered …

Ram Awatar Choudhary @ Ram Awatar ChouhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ram Awatar Choudhary, was arrested in connection with a robbery of Rs 1,00,000 alleged to have occurred on 25 September 2024, based solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Dablu Choudhary. The petitioner contended that he had no involvement, no criminal antecedent, and …

Raja kumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Raja Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, after a mobile phone was seized from him. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, asserting that the …

Lilawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Lilawati Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased Kajal Kumari, applied for regular bail in a criminal case registered under sections 103(1), 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was subjected to dowry‑related cruelty by her husband and mother‑in‑law and …

Lal Mahammad Mian @ Anil Mian @ Lalmohammad MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lal Mahammad Mian was arrested as a pillion rider on a stolen bike and charged under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. He contended that he had no knowledge of the bike’s stolen status and was merely giving a lift to Mojaheed Mian, asserting his innocence. The State …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought regular bail in a murder case (IPC sections 302/34) arising from the death of a man whose son allegedly disappeared and was later found dead. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, had taken the deceased away, leading to his death, and …

Shankar Paswan @ Shankar PasawanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shankar Paswan was arrested in connection with the murder of Rahul Kumar, alleged to have been shot by unknown assailants. The prosecution alleged that Paswan, along with others, was responsible, citing sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Paswan contended that he …

Md Waquar @ Waquar AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Waquar Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a case alleging indiscriminate firing and multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed he fired at several individuals, while the defence argued he was falsely implicated, citing minor injuries to …

Ramchandra Sahani @ Ramchandra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ramchandra Sahani, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 concerning the alleged dowry‑related murder of Indu Kumari. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by her in‑laws over a demand for a motorcycle and cash, and that …

Shivbalak Sahani @ ModiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shivbalak Sahani, was charged with kidnapping and sexual offences against a minor under sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he abducted the informant's daughter, took her to Nepal, assaulted her, and later abandoned …

Bacha Lal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bacha Lal Kumar was arrested in connection with a human‑trafficking case (Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No.161 of 2025) alleging violations of Section 143(6) of the B.N.S., Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Sections 3 and 14 of the Child Adolescent Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act. The …

Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bhola Kumar and Amit Kumar, were arrested in Nawada district on suspicion of bike theft and were alleged to have confessed to the crime during police interrogation. The prosecution claimed that the two jointly stole bikes, removed their number plates, and concealed them in a house, …

Vikash ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikash Manjhi was arrested in connection with an alleged kidnapping of a minor girl for the purpose of marriage, charged under sections 87 and 96 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, asserted that she had gone with the petitioner of her own …

Raja @ Karan @ Makhan @ Makhan RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raja @ Karan @ Makhan @ Makhan Ram, sought regular bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged looting of Rs.5,96,000 from cattle traders. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Amarjeet Kumar, who …

Ajay Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ajay Kumar Sah was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act, where the police claimed to have recovered 147 grams of a smokable narcotic from his possession. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, that no contraband was actually …

Rabi Kumar @ Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rabi Kumar, the owner of a DCM truck, was implicated in a case where a police officer was shot and later died during a rescue attempt by a gang. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 302, 307, 353, 323/34 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, but did not …

Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, sought regular bail in a criminal case alleging kidnapping of a minor daughter of an informant, charged under Sections 173(2), 96 and 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution argued that the petitioner had retained the minor without guardian permission, while the petitioner …

Dheeraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Singh @ Dheeraj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 21 and 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly loading cartoons that contained 4,500 ampules of Leegesic injection with 2.7 g of buprenorphine. He contended that he was …

Kanhai KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Kanhai Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution’s case was based on a raid of the petitioner’s house, during which eight mobile phones, a passbook, identity documents and …

Ashok Das @ Ashok Kr. DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ashok Das was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 132 and 111 of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The police, acting on a tip, seized three persons at a field; no weapons were recovered from them, only from a co‑accused, Saurav …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sonu Kumar, a driver of an oil tanker, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 15.4 kg of ganja and charged under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(C), 22(C), 24 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, that the seizure was not made in compliance with Section 105 …

Idarish Rain @ Edrish Rain @ Md. Idarish RainversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Idarish Rain, applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., alleging he only gave orders and did not personally commit any overt act. The prosecution alleged that a group of 15-20 unknown persons, allegedly acting on the petitioner’s orders, assaulted …

Md. Naiyer Alam @ Naiyar AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Naiyer Alam, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged violations of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, based on a police raid that recovered arms from a poultry farm allegedly linked to a gun factory run by Pankaj Kumar. The prosecution alleged …

Amit Kumar Gupta @ Amit Kumar Sah @ GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Gupta, was arrested for possession of codeine‑based cough syrups and capsules and charged under Section 27(B)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act and Sections 20, 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that 16 bottles of Onerex syrup, 4 bottles of Windex syrup …

Anil Kumar Thakur @ Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Thakur, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., alleging that he was wrongly implicated based on CCTV identification and a confessional statement, with no material recovered from his possession. The prosecution argued that unknown …

Tabrej @ TabrezversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Tabrej @ Tabrez, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act after police recovered about 90 grams of a smokable narcotic from a rented house. The petitioner contended that he was not the tenant, had no possession of the seized material, and …

Samar SahaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a driver, was arrested after police recovered 100 bottles of Phensedyl cough syrup containing codeine from his vehicle, alleging violations of Sections 21(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the drug, the seizure was not made in …

Chandan Sahni @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chandan Sahni, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Kanti Case No. 407 of 2024) alleged under sections 103(1) and 309(6) of the B.N.S and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based primarily on a confessional statement made by a co‑accused, who named the …

Rishi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rishi Kumar was arrested for alleged offences under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act after a robbery and shooting in which the victim, Yudhisthir Seth, died. The prosecution’s case was based on a First Information Report and the fact that the …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act for possession of several bottles of codeine‑containing cough syrups. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of criminal antecedents, and that the seized substances contain only 0.2% …

Suraj Singh @ Bhan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Suraj Singh was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged planning of an armed offence and was charged under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution said secret information led police to apprehend Singh and four …

Dhaneshwar Mahto @ Dhaneshwar Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhaneshwar Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 20, 22 and 23 of the NDPS Act after police claimed to have recovered 4.9 kg of ganja from his house. He contended that he had no possession of the contraband, was falsely implicated, and that the seizure violated …

Sanni KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and a live cartridge. He claimed innocence, asserting that nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and that he was falsely …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Chandan Kumar Jha was arrested in connection with an alleged possession of two country‑made pistols, three live cartridges and a motorcycle, alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He filed a petition for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that …

Amit TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amit Tiwari was arrested in connection with a violent assault on the son of an informant, during which the co‑accused Ankit Pathan allegedly inflicted a fatal stab wound. The prosecution alleged that Tiwari, along with others, entered the premises armed with lathis, dandas and a knife. Tiwari …

Bibi Tabassum @ Bibi TabasumversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bibi Tabassum was arrested after police seized 95 bottles of codeine cough syrup (0.2% concentration) from her residence, leading to charges under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that the seizure was illegal, the witnesses were police personnel, Section 105 of the …

Akhilesh Kumar @ BaunaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Akhilesh Kumar, brother‑in‑law of a woman who died by hanging, filed a regular bail petition in a case registered under sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the FIR was described as vague and the primary accusation in such cases usually targets …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that no weapons were recovered from his possession and that the seizure list was prepared by police personnel without complying with mandatory Section 105 of the BNSS. …

Jhameli SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jhameli Sah, father‑in‑law of the deceased, sought regular bail in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80, 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that the victim, Poonam Devi, was killed by her in‑laws for not fulfilling a dowry demand of a motorcycle, while the …

Md. Intekhab Alam @ Md. Intkhab @ Itkhab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Intekhab Alam, was arrested for possession of 150 bottles of cough syrups containing codeine, alleged to violate Sections 8, 21(c) and 22(c) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution argued that the seized quantity constituted a commercial amount of contraband, citing the Supreme Court’s …

Sudesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Sudesh Kumar was arrested on charges of theft of oil from an Indian Oil Corporation pipeline, alleged to have violated Sections 379, 440 and 120(B) of the IPC, sections 15(2), 15(4) and 16 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipe Line (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 and Section 7 of the …

Mahtab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mahtab Alam, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping alleged under section 140(3) of the B.N.S.S. and has been in judicial custody since 29 April 2025. The prosecution alleged that a vehicle owned by the petitioner was used in the kidnapping, but the informant’s uncle has not …

Appu Kumar @ Appu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Appu Kumar Yadav, was arrested in a case registered under Sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged theft of Rs.2,38,010 from his bike. He claims innocence, stating that the accusation stems solely from a confessional statement of co‑accused Anish Raj, with no …

Shashi Bhushan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shashi Bhushan Singh, was charged with offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 427, 379, 307/34 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly damaging vehicles, stealing Rs 40,000, assaulting a staff member with a lathi and iron rod and firing in the air. The petitioner’s counsel argued that …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ankit Kumar was arrested for alleged kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor, the informant’s daughter, under sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statements under sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S.S. claim she went with the petitioner, was …

Md. Filtar @ NaushadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Filtar @ Naushad, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 305(b) and 105 of the BNS for alleged theft of a bag containing cash and a mobile phone from a train. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants stole the bag and pushed the victim out of the train, …

Dil Khush Kumar @ Dilkhush YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dil Khush Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged robbery and assault under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that three persons intercepted an informant, snatched his mobile and fired at him. The FIR named unknown …

Shahnawaz Khan @ Mister KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shahnawaz Khan petitioned for regular bail in a case alleging his involvement in an attempted kidnapping and shooting of the informant's son on 18 June 2025, charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351, 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR was lodged two …