Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

1959 judgments · newest first · showing 1601–1800

Nigam Kumar @ Naman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nigam Kumar, was arrested for alleged possession of 1.038 kg of charas and charged under sections 336(2), 317(4), 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and section 20(B)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. He sought regular bail, contending that the seized substance was not in his …

Anup Yadav @ Anoop Yadav @ Anup Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anup Yadav was arrested in an NDPS case (Case No. 161 of 2025) after police recovered 4 kg of opium-like substance from co‑accused. The petitioner argued that no narcotic was seized from him, the charge‑sheet was filed without a forensic science laboratory (FSL) report, and no extension was sought …

Manzar @ Mejar @ Md. Manzar Alam @ Manzar AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manzar Alam was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged robbery, extortion, and theft of cattle, charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 11(1)(I) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The prosecution alleged that a group of ten to twelve persons intercepted a …

Irshad @ Irshad AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Irshad Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Case No. 132 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was an associate of Aashuiq …

Ram Nandan Mahto @ RamanandversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ram Nandan Mahto, sought regular bail in a criminal case registered under sections 85 and 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to the dowry‑related death of his daughter‑in‑law, Neha Kumari. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was …

Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.1014 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the informant supplied articles worth Rs.48,50,996 and the petitioner had paid only Rs.13,70,083, with interest …

Pradeep Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Gupta, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 45.354 kg of ganja from a vehicle and charged under Sections 20(B)(ii)(C), 23(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He contended that he was merely a passer‑by, not the driver or owner of the car, and that the charge‑sheet …

Rishu Babu @ Md. RaisversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, identified as Rishu Babu (actually Md. Rais), was charged under Sections 137(2), 96 and 64 of the BNS and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly luring a minor girl, taking her to Purnea, and having forceful sexual intercourse. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, was charged with touching the private parts of a three‑year‑old girl, the daughter of the informant, under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The informant filed a compromise petition stating that the child’s injuries were …

Devchandra SardarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Devchandra Sardar, was arrested after a police raid recovered 106.5 kg of ganja from bushes, with the petitioner allegedly emerging from the scene. He contended that the substance was not in his conscious possession and that the charge‑sheet was filed without the mandatory forensic …

Shivam Kumar @ Shivam Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivam Kumar was arrested after police recovered 74.5 kg of ganja-like substance from two four‑wheelers. He was charged under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended he was merely a passenger, not in …

Md. Jamal Malik @ Babloo MalikversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Jamal Malik, sought bail for offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act after police recovered a revolver and numerous cartridges from his residence following a land‑dispute shoot‑out. The prosecution alleged that he was part of a group …

Manoj Kumar Shah @ Manoj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Kumar Shah was arrested for alleged sale of ketamine injections and charged under Sections 8/22 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a statement recorded by a Sub‑Inspector of the Central Narcotics Bureau, which the petitioner contended was inadmissible under …

Parshuram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Parshuram Kumar, a tempo driver, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 309(3) and 309(4) of the B.N.S., alleging that he stole a mobile phone, a gold ring and cash from an informant and assaulted him. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in connection with an offence under sections 308(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and has been in judicial custody since 5 July 2025. The prosecution’s case is based on a phone call allegedly made by a co‑accused and a confessional statement of another co‑accused, …

Saurav Kumar @ Saurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that the only link to the offence was a co‑accused’s confessional statement and that no arms were recovered from his possession. The State opposed the bail, contending …

Rambabu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rambabu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1-b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and two live cartridges. The petitioner contended that nothing was recovered from him and that the police seizure list violated Section 105 of the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S for allegedly possessing a stolen bike that was being negotiated for sale. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, forced by police to act as a witness, and subsequently framed when he refused. He had …

Kailu Paswan @ Manoj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Kailu Paswan was arrested in connection with a theft case (Section 394 IPC) where unknown assailants allegedly stole Rs. 53,000 from an informant. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the FIR named unknown miscreants and that no material was recovered from him, though he had given a …

Sintu Yadav @ Santu Yadav @ Santu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners – Sintu Yadav, Rabindra Yadav and Ram Pravesh Yadav – were arrested in connection with a case (PS Chiksaura, Case No 221 of 2025) alleging assault with lathis, iron rods and firearms, resulting in grievous injuries to the informant’s family members. They were charged under sections …

Md. Shohrab @ Md. ShohravversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Md. Shohrab was arrested in Supaul P.S. Case No. 497 of 2025 for alleged assault on an informant’s mother with a farsa, resulting in head injuries. The prosecution alleged multiple serious offences under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 66 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he lured an informant into a physical relationship by falsely promising marriage, detained her for two days, and later demanded a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. The petitioner pleaded …

Saroj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Saroj Kumar was arrested after police stopped a car carrying 5.6 kg of charas-like material, which they recovered from the vehicle, not from his person. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver, that the seizure list lacked his signature, and that the police failed to comply with …

Bindeshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bindeshwar Yadav, Jiwachh Yadav and Bhola Yadav, were arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for alleged assault on an informant and a woman named Urmila Devi. The prosecution alleged that Bindeshwar ordered Bhola to assault the informant …

Balli Sahni @ Bali SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Balli Sahni applied for bail in a case (Sahiyara PS Case No. 170 of 2025) alleging his involvement in the death of an informant's father, charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution claimed the accused assaulted the deceased with a lathi, …

Yash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Yash Kumar, sought bail in a rape case (Criminal Miscellaneous No.60844 of 2025) pending trial in the Patna High Court. The trial was at an advanced stage with witnesses already examined, including the victim as PW-1. The court referred to a Supreme Court decision in X v. State of …

Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Sujit Kumar was charged under several provisions of the B.N.S., the Arms Act and the SC/ST (POA) Act for allegedly firing at an informant’s house and using caste‑based abuse on 15 June 2025. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the allegations were vague, no specific …

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Yadav @ Chhotaka ChorwaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Sunil Kumar was convicted in a murder case (Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 272 of 2024) involving the death of a son found on a railway line. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, along with co‑accused, had threatened the victim, and a confessional statement of another accused named the …

Pampam Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, a beetle seller, was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., the Arms Act and the SC/ST (POA) Act for allegedly instigating two individuals not to move their bikes from his shop, after which they fired and injured an informant and another person. The Special Judge denied bail, …

Pramod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Manoj Yadav and Pramod Yadav, were charged in PS‑Ara Nagar case No. 323/2025 for offences under the Bihar Non‑Applicable Statutes, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act following a shooting that resulted in the death of the respondent’s son. The prosecution’s case …

Manoj Yadav @ Pramod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Manoj Yadav and Pramod Yadav were charged under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act (later amended with Sections 25(1)(b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act) for allegedly firing indiscriminately and causing the death of a …

Ganaur SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ganaur Sah appealed against the denial of bail in a case where he was charged under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238(a) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly disposing of a deceased's body. The prosecution’s case …

Milky Kumar @ Mikki Kumar @ Himanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Milky Kumar was arrested for theft of jewellery valued at approximately Rs.10 lakh and charged under sections 305 and 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded innocence, asserting that the gold chain and rings recovered from him were purchased by him on 04.06.2025, as evidenced by a purchase …

Aun MohammadversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Aun Mohammad, sought regular bail in a case alleging forced sexual intercourse, assault on the informant and her father, and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution presented a medical report showing injuries and an old hymen tear, and the victim’s …

Awadhesh PrajapativersusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Awadhesh Prajapati was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 191(3), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 76, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting Shyam Sundar Prajapati and his wife with a stick, causing injuries. The petitioner claimed he was falsely …

Anil MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Anil Mahto, sought regular bail in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 436 and 304 for allegedly setting fire to an informant's hut, resulting in the death of a two‑month‑old baby. The prosecution alleged that six accused, including the petitioner, were responsible for the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 342, 323, 324, 327, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he and four others kidnapped and assaulted an informant, stole money and attempted murder. The prosecution alleged that the accused …

Vikash Kumar @ PuttiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikash Kumar petitioned for bail in a case registered under Sections 61(2), 109, 111 and 140 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, a step‑brother of an informant, had hired a contract killer for Rs. 8,00,000. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, that the …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl, with charges under IPC sections 366(A), 504, 506, 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 7. The victim, now a mother of a ten‑year‑old child, testified that she voluntarily went with the petitioner, married him at age …

Vishambhar Nath Dubey @ Bisambar Nath PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vishambhar Nath Dubey, an assistant in PEERS and DE-PEERS Allied Corporation Ltd., was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 468/34 and Section 3 of the Bihar Protection of Interest of Depositors Act for alleged cheating of depositors. The petitioner argued that he merely collected money and had no …

Gautam RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gautam Rai, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle intercepted by police on suspicion of transporting contraband. Police alleged that two women in the vehicle were carrying 2098.41 grams of brown sugar, while only a mobile phone was recovered from the petitioner’s possession. The …

Radha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Radha Devi was arrested in connection with a case (PS Raghopur Case No. 247 of 2025) involving assault with bricks and an iron rod that resulted in the death of the informant's brother. The FIR originally did not name her, but her name was added a month later based on the deceased's mother's …

Badal Kumar Bhuiya @ Badal BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Badal Kumar Bhuiya was arrested in connection with the recovery of 423.360 litres of foreign liquor allegedly from a car he was driving, and charged under section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner …

Bipat ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bipat Chaudhary was charged under Section 76 of the BNS and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act for allegedly attempting to rape a minor in a banana field. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS described the alleged act, but she refused a medical examination. The petitioner argued that …

Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four members of the Yadav family, were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 for allegedly arriving armed and assaulting an informant. The prosecution alleged that Naresh Yadav ordered the …

Vijay Kumar @ Bijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vijay Kumar and Bharat Kumar, brothers, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for alleged possession of two country‑made pistols. The prosecution alleged that the pistols were recovered from the petitioners' possession, while the petitioners …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 69, 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that he had a consensual relationship with the informant, promised marriage, and later threatened her when she …

Dharmendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Yadav, was arrested in connection with the murder of Aarti Kumari, alleged under sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case is based on a dead body found near a railway track and a claim that the petitioner and his associates killed the victim and …

Mahesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahesh Mahto was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging assault, criminal intimidation and attempted rape under sections 323, 504, 354(b), 376, 511 IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act. The victim’s statement, given on solemn affirmation, described only a hand‑pulling incident and made no …

Sandesh Kumar Ram @ Sandesh Kr.versusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sandesh Kumar Ram, was charged under Section 64 of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged forced sexual intercourse with the minor daughter of an informant. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. described an incident where the petitioner, allegedly …

Dipu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dipu Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Paliganj P.S. Case No. 330 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the minor daughter of an informant was abducted by Vishal Rai. The victim later gave a statement under Section …

Aman Kumar singhversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Aman Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant, alleged under Sections 96, 3(5), 137(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution claimed the petitioner abducted the child, while the defence argued that the …

Ranjit Kumar MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Mehta, sought bail in an NDNDPS case where 24.071 kg of ganja-like material was allegedly seized from his courtyard. He contended that the seizure was illegal as the police did not comply with Section 105 of the BNSS and the charge‑sheet was filed without a forensic …

Nandan Kumar @ Nand KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nandan Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Kasba P.S. Case No. 241 of 2025, alleged to involve theft of a bike and cash under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution claimed two unknown persons stole the bike and cash, and that the petitioner, a staff member of …

Uma Shankar Pd. MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raj Kumari Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased Kajal Kumari, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Kajal Kumari was subjected to dowry‑related cruelty and was later found dead with marks of assault, with the …

Shekhar Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shekhar Kumar Sinha, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 326 of 2025) registered under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants in an Ertiga vehicle assaulted him and stole his Tata Intra loaded with vegetables, along with Rs. …

Raj Kishore YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raj Kishore Yadav, was accused of assaulting Mukesh Kumar with an iron rod, causing injuries to the head. The investigating officer admitted he failed to record Mukesh Kumar's statement due to ignorance and acknowledged the need for training. The court examined the allegation that …

Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar Singh, sought bail in a case registered as Jale P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 105 and 238 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that during a marriage ceremony the petitioner and others discharged …

Rajesh Paswan @ Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rajesh Paswan, sought bail for offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 117(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., alleging he was falsely implicated in an armed assault on an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with 14 others, attacked the …

Arbind YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Arbind Yadav was arrested in connection with a mob assault case (PS Khesar Case No. 66 of 2025) alleged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act. The prosecution alleged that members of the mob, armed with lathi‑danda, assaulted the informant’s family, but no specific allegation …

Raj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS, alleging that he ordered a co‑accused to douse a JCB with petrol, an act that allegedly never occurred. The prosecution contended that the petitioner orchestrated the plan and also took …

Hukumdeo Yadav @ Hukumdev YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Hukumdeo Yadav, was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for allegedly ordering assaults with iron rods, a farsa, and lathis, and for pulling the informant's wife's saree and taking her locket. He contended that he was falsely implicated in a family feud and that the …

SHRI BHAGWAN YADAV @ BHAGWAN YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bhagwan Yadav and Hararam Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered in 2010 under several IPC sections (341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379, 511/34). They had previously been granted bail, but their bail bonds were cancelled multiple times (2014, 2018, 2025) for non‑appearance, …

Vijay Paswan @ Vinay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vijay Paswan was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on an informant, involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Paswan, along with his father, attacked the informant with a cudgel, causing head injury. Paswan contended that he was falsely implicated, …

Aminath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Aminath Yadav was arrested in connection with a case where he was alleged to have struck the husband of an informant, causing unconsciousness. The prosecution charged him under multiple sections of the B.N.S., while the petitioner claimed innocence, citing a minor swelling on the victim’s head and …

Md. Nashiruddin Sah @ Nashiruddin ShahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four residents of Chausima Kalyanpur, were implicated in FIR No.315 of 2025 for multiple offences under the Bihar National Security Act, 2023, including assault on police, theft of an INSAS rifle and a sword, and other violent offences. The prosecution alleged that a large mob …

Pinki KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Pinki Kumari, wife of Ankush Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115, 352, 109 and 85 of the Bihar Penal Code (BNS) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s husband, Arun Kumar, failed to meet a …

Dilip RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Dilip Ram and Satyendra Ram, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging they assaulted the informant's son with a sword and bhala, causing multiple grievous injuries. The prosecution …

Nandjee SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners Nandjee Singh and Dhanjee Singh were arrested in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred in Sanjhauli, Rohtas, where they, along with others, allegedly assaulted several persons with weapons, including an iron rod, lathi‑danda and a tooth bite. They were charged …

Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Sah, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 75, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code, alleging assault on an informant, his family and misbehaviour with a minor. The prosecution claimed the petitioner assaulted the informant, his …

ANUBHAV KUMAR SINGH @ ABHINAV KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anubhav Kumar Singh petitioned for regular bail in a case registered under sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that two men on a motorcycle arrived at the petitioner’s …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly attacking an informant and his brother with a rod and knife, causing serious injuries. The prosecution alleged that the assault was intended to kill, while …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Abhishek Kumar, was charged in a case involving a mob assault, theft of cash, and caste-based abuse under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and the SC/ST (POA) Act. He contended that his name was not mentioned in the FIR and that the allegation against him was merely that he was part of …

Ratnesh Kumar MishraversusThe Union of India

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ratnesh Kumar Mishra, was arrested after 2 kg of heroin was seized from his vehicle during a police operation. He contended that he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the contraband hidden beneath the rear seat where another accused was seated. The prosecution argued that …

KAILU YADAVversusTHE SATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, Kailu Yadav and Naresh Yadav, appealed the denial of bail in a case where they were charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering a woman's house armed, abusing her with caste slurs, and assaulting her with a pistol. …

Mamta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mamta Devi appealed against the denial of bail in a case where she was accused of assaulting the niece of an informant and using caste‑based slurs, offences alleged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Nat. Security Act, 2023 and Sections 3(i), (r), (s), 2(Va) of the SC/ST …

Dharmendra Rajbhar @ Dharmendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appeal was filed by two accused under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of bail by the Special Judge in Buxar. The FIR alleged that the accused, armed with lathis, assaulted the complainant causing bleeding injuries and charges …

Raphik AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Raphik Ansari, was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged assault and related offences in a case registered as Kateya P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025. The trial court …

Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appeal was filed by Kiran Devi under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of bail by the Exclusive Special Judge in a case arising from the death of the complainant’s husband in a vehicular accident. The prosecution alleged that the …

PADDU YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Paddu Yadav appealed to the Patna High Court against the trial court's refusal to grant bail in a case under the SC/ST Act and IPC offences of murder, abetment of suicide and criminal conspiracy. The appellant argued that his bail had been repeatedly cancelled despite his claim of non‑appearance due …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Gupta @ RajanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners Ramesh Kumar Jha, Abhishek Kumar and Savita Devi were arrested in connection with a bank robbery (PS Case No. 113 of 2025) involving armed dacoity, theft of cash and jewellery worth crores, punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution …

Savita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners Ramesh Kumar Jha, Abhishek Kumar and Savita Devi were arrested in connection with a bank robbery (PS Case No. 113 of 2025) involving armed dacoity, theft of cash and jewellery worth crores, punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution …

Ramesh Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners Ramesh Kumar Jha, Abhishek Kumar and Savita Devi were arrested in connection with a bank robbery (PS Case No. 113 of 2025) involving armed dacoity, theft of cash and jewellery worth crores, punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution …

Santosh Kumar Mehata @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Kumar Mehata was arrested in connection with the death of his wife Gita Devi, who was alleged to have been subjected to dowry harassment. The FIR described a ligature mark on the deceased’s neck, leading to charges under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioner contended that he …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, where 71.08 kg of raw ganja-like plants were recovered from his courtyard. The prosecution argued that the seized material constituted a substantial …

Sourav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sourav Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 60 of 2025) alleging he abducted a minor girl for marriage, charged under Sections 96, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The victim later gave a statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., claiming …

Ravish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ravish Kumar, sought bail for alleged offences under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act relating to a bank robbery in which armed men looted cash and jewellery. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the bank, held staff and customers hostage, and …

Sushil Kumar @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sushil Kumar, was charged with murder under IPC sections 302, 201, 34 and the SC/ST (POA) Act sections 3(2)(iv) and 3(2)(v). The Special Judge had rejected his bail application, prompting an appeal. The appellant argued that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting Bhola Shankar with an iron rod, causing a lacerated wound. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and highlighting a delay in filing the FIR. …

Badal chaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Badal Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023, including alleged theft of Rs.1,62,000 from an informant’s pocket and assault with an iron rod and bricks. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, argued …

Bunty YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bunty Yadav was arrested in connection with an assault alleged to have been committed with a khanti on the head of the informant’s son, Gopal, causing unconsciousness. The petitioner contended that he is innocent, that the informant is his father and the dispute stems from a share issue, and that …

Munna Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Munna Yadav, was charged under sections 126(2), 109, 308(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting the informant's son, Gulshan Kumar, with the butt of a gun, causing a superficial abrasion on the eyebrow and reported pain. The petitioner pleaded innocence and argued …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Pintu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (S. Kamal P.S. Case No. 232 of 2025) alleging that he and others fired about 25 rounds of ammunition, injuring the informant’s husband. The petitioner claimed he was merely a member of the mob and faced no specific charge of firing, arguing that the …

Kamlesh Kumar Yadav @ Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kamlesh Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with an assault on an informant, alleged to have involved bricks and resulting in multiple injuries. He was charged under sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and denied bail by the trial court on the ground that the …

Anant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anant Kumar was in judicial custody for offences alleged under the B.N.S., 2023 relating to an alleged assault on police during an attempt to apprehend another accused. The prosecution claimed that the petitioner, together with many others, attacked the police with lathi, danda and bricks, damaging …

Sakina KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sakina Khatoon and Sakila Khatoon, applied for bail in a case (Basopatti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025) involving alleged assault on an informant and his family, resulting in serious injuries and the death of Sattar Ansari. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with 24 …

Prakash Chandra Prabhat @ Prakash Kumar @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Prakash Chandra Prabhat, was charged under sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Act, with a later addition of section 103(1) of B.N.S., for allegedly hurling bombs at B.N. College, Patna, resulting in a student's death. He applied for …

Abhay Kumar @ Ghunghuru @ Ghunghuru SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was charged under sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 351(2), 308(4), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting an informant with the butt of a gun. The State opposed regular bail, citing the petitioner’s criminal antecedent and the injury inflicted. The …

Surendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Surendra Singh was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have ordered and personally assaulted Renu Kumari with an iron rod, causing a fractured elbow. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, had no prior …

Anil Pal @ Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Anil Pal, was arrested in connection with PS Giriyak Case No. 395 of 2025 for alleged assault with a bamboo stick on an informant's head, resulting in minor injuries, and a subsequent altercation involving the informant's son. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the …

Avinash Kunwar @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Avinash Kunwar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS for allegedly assaulting the informant's daughter. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, surrounded the girl, attempted to take her to a jungle, and assaulted …

Lav Kumar @ Genauri Yadav @ Labh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lav Kumar and Kush Yadav were arrested in connection with an alleged assault on the husband of an informant, involving the use of a firearm and a sword, and charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed the accused fired a weapon and inflicted …

Shivdut Paswan @ Sivdatt Paswan @ Shivdutt PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivdut Paswan was arrested in connection with a violent incident in Pipra, Supaul, where the FIR alleges that he, along with 14 others, assaulted an informant and two rescuers using weapons such as a farsa, sword and iron rod. The petitioner contended that the allegations against him were vague, …

Pinki Devi @ NehaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Pinki Devi (Neha), wife of Umesh Ram, was arrested in connection with Bhabua Police Station Case No. 768 of 2025 for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 127, 318(4), 307, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleges that she, along with co‑accused, facilitated a marriage and …

Ambuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ambuj Kumar, was charged with murder, attempt to murder, conspiracy, and offences under the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a shooting incident in Majorganj. The trial court denied bail, relying on the identification of the appellant by a witness who …

Ramesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Ramesh Mandal, Md Aftab Alam and Manish Kumar appealed the denial of bail in a case (Jhandapur PS Case No. 64 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused abducted and …

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan SharmaversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellant, Raushan Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 307, 302 and 34, Arms Act section 27 and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(v) for a murder incident in Bahadurpur. The trial court denied his bail application, holding that the charges were serious. On appeal, the appellant argued that he was falsely …

Md Aftab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard three criminal appeals filed by Ramesh Mandal, Md Aftab Alam and Manish Kumar seeking bail after the Special Judge of the SC/ST (POA) Act in Bhagalpur rejected their bail applications under Sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. The …

Raj Kumar PandeyversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Raj Kumar Pandey, was charged in a mob assault case under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that a group of accused stopped a motorcycle, assaulted the occupants, and stole cash, but the FIR did not name the …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Ramesh Mandal, Md Aftab Alam and Manish Kumar appealed the denial of bail in a case (Jhandapur PS Case No. 64 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused abducted and …

Om Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Om Prakash Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 365, 302, 394, 120B and 34, and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the murder of a sand‑truck driver. The Special Judge had rejected his bail application, relying mainly on a confessional statement of a …

Vikash Kumar @ Vivek MuskanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Vikash Kumar, was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy, illegal possession of arms and an offence under the SC/ST Act after a firing incident at a dance program resulted in a death. The prosecution alleged that the appellant and others were holding weapons and that the deceased …

Kundan Swarnkar @ Kundan SoniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Kundan Swarnkar, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 124(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging involvement in an acid‑spraying incident that caused grievous injuries to several victims. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with three …

Sharda TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sharda and Deepak Tiwari were arrested in connection with the seizure of 19.2 kg of ganja from their residence under Sections 20(b)(ii)B and 22 of the NDPS Act. They contended that the seizure was irregular, the police failed to follow Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, and no …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Kumar petitioned for regular bail in a case registered under sections 140(2), 3(5) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was linked to an abduction incident through a call data record (CDR) showing communication between the petitioner and a suspect. The …

Bal Kishun KewatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bal Kishun Kewat applied for bail in a case (Atri PS No.136 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Information Technology Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Kewat, as the father of Shalu Kumar, had called on a mobile number to dissuade …

Naushad AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Naushad Alam, was charged under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged murder of his wife, Karima Khatoon, whose death was initially presented as a homicide due to alleged dowry cruelty. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and family members …

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Pawan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 319(2), 304(2) and 308(4) of the B.N.S., alleging that he, posing as a police officer, forcibly seized a mobile phone and a bike and demanded Rs.20,000. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was …

Navin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Navin Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Bhadaur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2022, alleging offences under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of funds under the Nal Jal Yojana. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …

Musan Mian @ Naseem AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Musan Mian, also known as Naseem Alam, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 330 of 2025 alleging that a minor girl, the informant's 15‑year‑old daughter, was called to Golu Mian's house and had a physical relationship with him, with the petitioner present. The prosecution alleged offences under …

Chhotu Mukhiya @ Chotu MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chhotu Mukhiya, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl, the informant's daughter, under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution claimed the petitioner had abducted the child, …

Badal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Badal Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a human‑trafficking offence. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was found with a minor girl near the Nepal border …

Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anshu Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 355 of 2025) under Section 96 of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that he abducted the minor daughter of an informant, while the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS …

Nandkishore MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Nandkishore Mahto, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Ballia P.S. Case No. 28 of 2020) involving alleged shooting of an informant's husband. He faces charges under IPC Sections 302, 307, 120(B) read with Section 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended …

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vijay Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on information that a group of miscreants planned an offence, and co‑accused who were apprehended …

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Singh, applied for bail in a case (Ara Nagar P.S. Case No. 701 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 109 and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, assaulted a land broker and later fired …

Gabbu Miya @ Ashique Ali @ Gabu Miya @ Ashik AliversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gabbu Miya, was charged under sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) of the IPC and sections 3 and 5 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for allegedly possessing a mobile phone and a knife after a police check. He claimed innocence, arguing that nothing was found in his conscious …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Manish Kumar was charged under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 (Sections 65(1), 137, 140(3), 115(2), 351(2)) and the POCSO Act (Sections 4 and 6) for allegedly kidnapping and sexually assaulting the minor daughter of the informant. The victim testified that Kumar, her uncle, forced her onto …

Bablu SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bablu Sharma and Bittu Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 352, 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the BNSS for allegedly assaulting the husband of an informant with a knife and also assaulting the informant herself. The prosecution alleged that the assault was …

Santosh @ Shiv Prasad Rai @ Shiv Prasad RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Santosh @ Shiv Prasad Rai, was charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 76, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 8 and 17 of the POCSO Act for allegedly indecently touching his eight‑year‑old niece’s private parts after she disrobed to pick mangoes. The victim’s statement recorded …

Mithlesh Yadav @ Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mithlesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a panchayat where he and others allegedly assaulted an informant and his son with a spade and lathi, leading to charges under multiple sections of the BNS. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations were vague, the injuries were …

Rohit PatelversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rohit Patel, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 64(1), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he had taken and circulated nude photographs and videos of an informant and had threatened her family. The prosecution’s case relied on the …

Vikash Kumar Yadav @ Vikash Kumar @ VikkiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikash Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a theft case under Section 311 of the B.N.S., 2023, alleged to have stolen a bike and mobile. The prosecution’s case relied on the recovery of a mobile from the petitioner’s possession and the identification of the petitioner by co‑accused. The …

Sahabuddin @ Sahabuddin KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sahabuddin Khan, was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Section 87 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim, an 18‑year‑old daughter of the informant, disappeared after visiting a hospital and later gave a statement …

Chunnu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant Chunnu Yadav filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4532 of 2025 challenging an order of the Special Court under the POCSO Act. The appellant's counsel sought to convert the appeal into a criminal miscellaneous proceeding, citing a prior decision (Cr. Misc. No.52792 of 2019) that bail orders …

Md. Saddam @ ImamuddinversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Saddam @ Imamuddin, was charged with abduction and attempted rape under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, tried to abduct a 20‑year‑old woman for marriage and attempted to rape her, but the villagers intervened and the …

Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, a driver of a pick‑up van, was arrested forty days after a robbery in which four unknown miscreants looted the vehicle and two mobile phones. The FIR named only unknown persons, but the petitioner was implicated and has been in judicial custody since 23 July 2025. He …

Md Shaif @ saifversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Shaif, was charged under Section 64 of the BNS, 2023, for alleged sexual intercourse on a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and the informant had a physical relationship, which ended with the petitioner’s parents assaulting the informant. The …

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Yadav petitioned for regular bail in a case registered under Section 70(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging rape of a minor. The prosecution alleged that six accused, including the petitioner, had raped the minor, based on a statement …

Vivek Sahni @ Vivake SahniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vivek Sahni applied for bail in a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act, where 2 kg of charas, mobile phones and cash were seized from a four‑wheeler in which he was allegedly present. The petitioner claimed he was neither the owner nor the …

Shashi Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shashi Kumar Singh applied for bail in a case registered under Section 414 IPC and Sections 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act, where a search of a four‑wheeler yielded 2 kg of charas, mobile phones and cash, and the petitioner was found seated in the vehicle. The petitioner contended that he …

Md. Astak Ahmad @ Md. Astak Alam @ Furfur @ Md AstakversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Astak Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) after a bag containing cash and documents was stolen. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but during investigation a co-accused, Mantajir Alam, gave a confessional statement that implicated the petitioner, …

Shammi KapoorversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shammi Kapoor was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 575 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Kapoor and co‑accused attempted to …

Ranjeet MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Mahto, was arrested in connection with an alleged assault on an informant involving a lathi, iron rod and daab, leading to a head injury. He faced charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34. The petitioner contended that the FIR was vague, the injury …

Dilkhush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S for alleged participation in a mob assault on an informant with an iron rod. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and that no overt act could be …

Kalpana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Kalpana Devi and Nirmal Kumar, were arrested in connection with a Banmankhi police case involving a small quantity of smack, alleged under Sections 8(C) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The police recovered the narcotic from co‑accused persons, whose statements implicated the petitioners, …

Satrudhan Sahni @ Shatrudhan SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Satrudhan Sahni, applied for regular bail in a case registered under section 309(4) of the B.N.S., alleging that he was not responsible for the alleged theft of cash and ATM cards. The prosecution alleged that the informant was robbed of cash and ATM cards after being taken in a …

Naim MiaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners sought modification of an anticipatory bail order dated 04-11-2025 which required them to surrender within six weeks. Due to clerical errors in the recorded father's names of appellant No.6 and No.9, they were unable to comply. The petition argued that the errors needed correction …

Chhotu Kumar Singh @ Dablu Kumar Singh @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar Singh, was arrested for alleged possession of 100 bottles of cough linctus containing codeine and charged under Sections 21(c), 22(c) and 25 of the NDPS Act. He contended that the seized preparation contained less than 2.5% codeine, falling within the exemption notified …

Lalo Kumar @ Lalo MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lalo Kumar (also known as Lalo Mahto) was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Arms Act for alleged possession and sale of illegal firearms and related items. The prosecution alleged that weapons were recovered from the house of a co-accused and that a confessional statement …

Raju Prasad Kushwaha @ Raju PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raju Prasad Kushwaha, was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for possession of 20 grams of Tramadol tablets and 0.4 grams of Nitrezipam, quantities below the commercial and small quantity thresholds respectively. He applied for regular bail, asserting innocence, …

Shekhar Das @ Shekhar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shekhar Das, a nephew of the deceased Poonam Kumari, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was subjected to dowry cruelty and was murdered by her in‑laws on 23 July 2025. The petitioner …

Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mithlesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged seizure of 35.04 grams of a narcotic substance from a bamboo clamp and charged under sections 8(c), 21(b) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act. He filed a petition for regular bail, contending that he had no possession, that the seizure was illegal …

Prakash Kumar @ Omprakash Kumar @ OmprakashversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. alleging assault with an iron rod, resulting in grievous injuries and theft of Rs.30,000. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, participated in the assault, while …

Yogendra RautversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Yogendra Raut was arrested in a case under the NDPS Act where 107.80 kg of ganja was seized from a scorpio vehicle that had met with an accident while attempting to flee. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the contraband, that the charge‑sheet was filed without the forensic …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and three live cartridges. The prosecution alleged that the weapon and ammunition were recovered from his possession, …

ARJUN PATELversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Arjun Patel, sought regular bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34, alleging that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution alleged that Patel assaulted the informant’s son with a knife blow to the abdomen and kidney after demanding payment of …

Raja Nayak @ Rohit Kumar NayakversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raja Nayak, was arrested after police seized 67 bottles of cough syrups (Korcof, Onerex, Wixdin) containing codeine from a gumti, and he was charged under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act. He contended that the syrups contained only 0.2% codeine, well below the 2.5% threshold …

Monu Kumar Singh @ Monu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Monu Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case involving 2.7 kg of charas and a loaded pistol, charged under IPC s.414, several provisions of the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. He has been in judicial custody since 21 March 2024, and no charge has yet been framed. The petitioner sought regular …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vikash Kumar, an employee of CMS Info System Ltd., was charged under sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 303(2) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly transporting Rs 20 lakh in a Swift Dzire car to load cash at a State Bank of India ATM in Gandhi Maidan. The prosecution alleged that he and …

Sumit Kumar @ RahulversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar (also known as Rahul), was charged under sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of an informant's husband. The prosecution's case rests solely on the confessional statement of co‑accused Vivek Kumar, …

Sandeep sahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Sah, was charged under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged human trafficking, involving a fake Instagram ID used to lure the victim to a dance company. He had previously applied for bail, which was rejected on 26-03-2025 with a direction that he could renew the …

Sahendra PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sahendra Pandey was arrested in connection with an assault on an informant, alleged to involve both a firearm and a sharp weapon, under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was ante‑dated, that there were inconsistencies …

Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder investigation where a co‑accused’s confessional statement implicated him for concealing a weapon used in the crime. The prosecution alleged his involvement under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 54, 351(3) of the Bihar Narcotic …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikram Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Information Technology Act, including fraud, threats and illegal access. The prosecution alleged that the accused were operating from …

Karan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Karan Singh was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms under IPC Sections 302, 120B/34 and Arms Act Section 27. His earlier bail petition was rejected, with a direction that he could renew after six months if the trial was not concluded. The petitioner now sought …

Arvind Sharma @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Arvind Sharma, sought regular bail in a case (Gamhariya P.S. Case No. 202 of 2024) where he is accused under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife, Karo Kumari, who was found throttled. The prosecution presented a post‑mortem report …

Sandeep Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Das, was charged under sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder-related offence. He applied for regular bail after an earlier bail application was rejected on the ground that the trial was ongoing. The High Court noted that the trial was at its final …

Munna Sah @ Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Dinanath Sah, were charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for assaulting individuals during a panchayat meeting. They applied for regular bail, arguing they have no prior criminal record and that three prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. The State …

Dinanath SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Dinanath Sah, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for assaulting individuals during a panchayat dispute. They applied for regular bail, having been in custody since August‑September 2024, and argued they had no prior criminal …

Shiv Shankar Prasad @ ChandanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shiv Shankar Prasad @ Chandan was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 61(2) and 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act) where the prosecution alleged a conspiracy and that Hari Shankar shot Surendra Singh, the informant’s brother. The petitioner contended that the FIR …

Suman Kumar SudhakarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar Sudhakar, sought bail in a case (Gidhaur PS Case No. 215 of 2025) alleging possession of counterfeit currency under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution argued that the petitioner was caught with four counterfeit Rs. 500 notes after a …

Santosh Kumar Chaudhary @ Santosh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a violent incident involving the burning of vehicles and assault on workers during the construction of a railway bridge, alleged to have been orchestrated by a group of extremists. The prosecution listed him among 63 accused persons and charged …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anand Kumar was arrested in connection with the alleged theft of a mobile phone and charged under section 304 of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement by co‑accused Vishal Kumar, who named the petitioner, but no material was recovered from the petitioner’s possession. …

Amar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amar Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery‑assault case (Pandarak P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he participated in a gang assault, theft of cash and cards, and illegal …

Sanjiv Kumar Mahto @ Sanjeev MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar Mahto, applied for bail in a Special NDPS case (No. 70 of 2025) arising from a seizure of 50.63 grams of cannabis resin recovered from co‑accused Md Sanowar and Md Sahwaj Alam, who identified the petitioner. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the …

Bilendra Kumar @ Birendra Kumar @ Bilendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bilendra Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 453 of 2024 for an alleged offence under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a group of miscreants who robbed an informant returning from a marriage ceremony. …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rahul Kumar was arrested in a case of stolen bicycles registered under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he was found with a seized bike but could not produce any documents for it, while the petitioner claimed he was an innocent passer‑by and …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ankit Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c), 17(c) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act, with the charge sheet filed under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and cognizance taken under Section 311 of the same Act. The prosecution's case relied on contraband recovered …

Chhotelal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Chhotelal Kumar, was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and several sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged participation in a violent attack on a Dalit settlement. The trial court refused bail, prompting an appeal …

Guddu GiriversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Giri appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case (Pupri PS Case No. 434 of 2024) where the deceased was the son of an informant. The prosecution relied on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, a witness’s "last‑seen" testimony, and alleged that the appellant was present at the …

Sandeep Yadav @ Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Sandeep Yadav, was charged under multiple provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Offences) Act for allegedly firing at a school‑going complainant. The trial court rejected his bail application, relying on the charges and the State’s …

Mahesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahesh Mandal appealed against the refusal of bail granted by the ADJ Special Court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a murder case where the complainant's husband was allegedly shot on Mandal's orders. The prosecution alleged that Mandal ordered the firing that …

Indrajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Indrajit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 1,047 grams of heroin from a swift car and charged under sections 8(c), 21(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He contended that he was merely a passenger, not the owner or driver, and had no prior criminal record, having been …

Suresh SawversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suresh Saw, was arrested for alleged offences under sections 126(2), 127(2) and 76 of the B.N.S. and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, accused of entering a house at night and teasing the minor daughter of the informant. The victim’s statement was recorded under sections 180 and …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amit Kumar was arrested during a police raid on a house in Patna after a Facebook advertisement offering loans through SBI YONO was traced to a suspicious mobile number. He was charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information …

Bipin Kumar @ Vipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, child marriage and offences under the POCSO Act. The prosecution claimed the petitioner abducted the informant’s daughter, who was later found to have allegedly married him and was under the age of consent. The …

Md. Shabir @ Raja @ Md. SabbirversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Shabir, was arrested for possession of 120 bottles of Onerex cough syrup containing 0.2% codeine and charged under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. He sought bail, arguing that the seizure was not conducted per Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and that the codeine …

Hasan Ansari @ Hasana Ansari @ Md. HasanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Hasan Ansari, was arrested in connection with Bahadurganj Police Station Case No.143 of 2011, which alleged offences under Sections 365, 366, 372 and 498/34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the alleged abduction of a complainant’s wife by Md. Mojib. The petitioner contended that …

Bhola ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bhola Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and eight live cartridges. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, asserted that nothing was recovered from his possession, and highlighted …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivam Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after a pistol was allegedly recovered from his possession. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted that no weapon was seized from him, and highlighted procedural violations, including the failure …

Jaleshwar MathoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jaleshwar Matho, father‑in‑law of the deceased woman, was arrested in a dowry‑death case under sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands and was killed, implicating the petitioner. The petitioner …

Mohhamad Miyan @ Mohhamad HussainversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mohhamad Miyan was arrested in connection with a case (PS Malahi Case No. 274 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 347(1) of the B.N.S., primarily for possession of a stolen bike whose number plates had been altered. The prosecution claimed the bike was …

Dilip Sahani @ Nitesh Ji @ Dilip Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip Sahani, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 121, 121(a), 120(b)), the Arms Act, the Explosive Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The …