THE BANGALORE TURF CLUB LTD.versusREGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
2014 INSC 98631 July 2014Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether race clubs such as the Bangalore Turf Club and the Royal Western India Turf Club, as well as a chit fund, fall within the definition of "shop" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) and the related notifications. The Court held that a race club is an "establishment" …
KRISHNAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA BY BABALESHWARA POLICE STATION
2012 INSC 31031 July 2012Dismissed
The deceased Bhimappa Biradar was attacked and murdered by a group of armed men who had a long-standing feud with his family. The trial court convicted three accused (A13, A14, A17) under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and acquitted four others (A1, A15, A16, A21) who were alleged to have only dragged the victim…
GUDDA @ DWARIKENDRAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2013 INSC 66030 September 2013Disposed off
The appellant Gudda (also known as Dwarikendra) was convicted of murdering three persons – a man, his pregnant wife and their five‑year‑old son – after inviting them to his rented house for lunch. The prosecution proved that the killings were pre‑planned and motivated by the appellant's suspicion about his wife's relat…
APOLLO TYRES LTD.versusC.P. SABASTIAN
2009 INSC 65130 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, an employee of Apollo Tyres Ltd., filed a civil suit seeking declaration that he remained a workman, challenging his transfer, restraining the employer from forcing a promotion, and protecting his trade‑union activities. The employer contended that the civil court lacked jurisdiction over matters relatin…
SARDAR ESTATESversusATMA RAM PROPERTIES (P) LTD.
2009 INSC 65230 April 2009Dismissed
The landlord filed an eviction petition against the tenant in the Delhi Rent Controller in 1981, which resulted in a decree of eviction in 1993 on the ground of subletting. The tenant appealed at multiple levels, including the Rent Control Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, and the Supreme Court, all of which upheld the e…
STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM/S PRO LAB & ORS. ETC.
2015 INSC 7630 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Entry 25 of Schedule VI of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, which levies tax on the processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and photo negatives. The issue centered on whether the State could tax the goods component of a works contract after the 46th…
ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2015 INSC 70629 September 2015Dismissed
Essar Teleholdings Ltd. and other petitioners challenged a Delhi High Court order and a Delhi government notification that appointed a Special Judge to try all offences, including those under the Indian Penal Code, arising from the 2G spectrum scam. They sought a joint trial of the main case and a second supplementary …
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAIversusM/S. FIAT INDIA (P) LTD. & ANR.
2012 INSC 36229 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, manufacturers of Fiat Uno cars, declared wholesale prices that were well below their manufacturing cost, claiming the price was the normal price under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act. The Revenue issued show‑cause notices alleging short levy and demanded differential duty, arguing that the pr…
M/S. QAZI NOORUL H.H.H. PETROL PUMP & ANR.versusDY. DIRECTOR, ESI CORPORATION
2009 INSC 97029 July 2009Dismissed
The appellant, a petrol pump operator, challenged an order directing him to pay contributions under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, arguing that his premises did not qualify as a "factory" within the meaning of the Act. The central issue was whether the activity of pumping petrol/diesel constituted a "manufac…
HIMALAYAN CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETYversusBALWAN SINGH
2015 INSC 36929 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Himalayan Co‑operative Group Housing Society expelled several members, including Balwan Singh, for defaulting on deposit payments. The expulsion was approved by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and upheld by the Revisional Authority. The respondents approached the High Court under Articles 226/227 seeking to …
PRADIP NANJEE GALAversusSALES TAX OFFICER & ORS.
2015 INSC 36829 April 2015Dismissed
The appellant, a partner in a firm assessed under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, claimed that a settlement with the State Minister for Finance had discharged his individual liability for the firm’s tax dues, and that the Commissioner had acted on this settlement. The Revenue contested the existence and effect of such …
M.K. BALAKRISHNAN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2009 INSC 63028 April 2009Hearing Adjourned
The petitioners raised a writ under Article 21 of the Constitution, contending that the chronic shortage of water for drinking and irrigation violated the fundamental right to life. The Court examined precedents that recognized water as an essential component of the right to life, including Delhi Water Supply & Sewage …
BANGALORE TURF CLUB LTD.versusREGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESI CORPORATION
2009 INSC 62828 April 2009Matter referred to larger bench
Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. challenged the Regional Director of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation's demand for ESI contributions, contending that as a club it does not qualify as a "shop" under Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The central issue was whether turf clubs fall within the defin…
MEHBOOBALI &ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2015 INSC 80427 October 2015Dismissed
The case involved a fake currency racket in Rajasthan where accused Mehboob Ali and Firoz, while in police custody, gave statements that led to the identification and arrest of co‑accused Anju Ali, Majhar, Liyakat Ali and others, and to the recovery of forged notes. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether such s…
MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C.versusNEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2015 INSC 80327 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) operated a bus owned by a private individual under a lease agreement. An accident caused by the bus led claimants to seek compensation. The dispute centered on whether liability for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 rested on the registered owner, the…
KAMLESH & ORS.versusATTAR SINGH & ORS.
2015 INSC 80527 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The dependants of Rishi Parkash filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the driver, owner and insurer of a Maruti car and the driver of a tempo, seeking compensation for his death in a collision. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held both drivers negligent and awarded Rs.5,81,000 with inter…
B. KUMAR@ JAYAKUMAR@ LEFT. KR.@ S. KUMARversusINSP. OF POLICE TH. C.B.C.L.D.
2014 INSC 101927 October 2014Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a mason, entered the house of the prosecutrix on 4 October 2002 armed with an aruval, intending to satisfy his lust. He tied up the brother (Manikandan) and a relative (Sangeetha), raped the prosecutrix, murdered Manikandan when he attempted to call for help, subsequently slit Sangeetha's throat, and sto…
KSL & INDUSTRIES LTD.versusM/SARIHANTTHREADS LTD. & ORS.
2014 INSC 73827 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed
KSL & Industries Ltd. appealed against a Delhi High Court order that set aside a Debt Recovery Tribunal decision allowing the appellant to recover Rs. 25.26 crore from M/s. Arihant Threads Ltd. The dispute centered on whether the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) – specifically Section 22,…
STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusM/S.LAOPALAR.G. LTD.
2014 INSC 21327 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Jharkhand issued Notification S.O. No.25 on 25 June 2001 reducing the Central Sales Tax rate to 3% for the "sale of all types of glass and glass sheets" in interstate trade. M/s Laopalarg Ltd., a manufacturer of glassware, claimed that its products fell within the "types of glass" and therefore were eligib…
ASHRAFKHAN @ BABU MUNNEKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2012 INSC 42526 September 2012Disposed off
The case involved 60 accused charged under TADA, the Arms Act and the Explosive Substances Act, of whom 11 were convicted by a Designated Court. The appellants contended that the FIR under TADA was registered without the mandatory prior approval of the District Superintendent of Police under s.20‑A(1) of TADA, renderin…
RADHEY SHYAM & ANR.versusCHHABI NATH & ORS.
2015 INSC 16026 February 2015Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant challenged a writ order of the Allahabad High Court that had vacated an interim injunction granted by a civil court, arguing that a writ of certiorari under Article 226 could not be issued against orders of a civil court. The Supreme Court was asked to reconsider the view expressed in *Surya Dev Rai* that…
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXversusM/S TATA CHEMICALS LTD.
2014 INSC 14426 February 2014
The case concerned whether the Union of India, as the tax authority, must pay interest on a tax refund made to M/s Tata Chemicals Ltd, a resident deductor who had deducted tax at source under Section 195(2) and later obtained a refund under Section 240. The Assessing Officer and the first appellate authority denied int…
M/S. HYDER CONSULTING (UK) LTD.versusGOVERNOR, STATE OF ORISSA THROUGH CHIEF ENGINEER
2014 INSC 80725 November 2014Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined whether Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 permits an arbitral tribunal to include pre‑award interest in the "sum" for which an award is made and thereby allow interest on that interest for the post‑award period. The Court held that the word "sum" includes both princi…
BALWANT RAI SALUJA &ANR. ETC. ETC.versusAIR INDIALTD. & ORS.
2014 INSC 56125 August 2014Dismissed
The case concerned workmen employed by a contractor to run a statutory canteen on the premises of Air India, which under Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948, must provide such a facility. The workmen claimed they were deemed employees of Air India and sought regularisation and other employment benefits. The Supreme C…
RAVICHANDRANversusSTATE BY DY. SUPERIN. OF POLICE, MADRAS
2010 INSC 16925 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for conspiracy, cheating, forgery of a palmolein oil permit and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and Essential Commodities Act. The prosecution alleged that accused A1, A2 and A4 had interpolated and forged the permit, relying mainly on handwriting identification by witnesse…
SURENDRA SINGH BENIWALversusHUKAM SINGH & ORS
2009 INSC 59523 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a lecturer who, after voluntarily transferring from one intermediate college to another, claimed that his seniority should be based on his original appointment date, placing him above a colleague already serving at the receiving college. The High Court had set aside the single judge’s order that had …
PREM CHANDRA AGARWAL & ANR.versusU.P. FINANCIAL CORPN. & ORS.
2009 INSC 59723 April 2009Dismissed
Prem Chandra Agarwal & Anr. appealed to the Supreme Court against an interim order passed by the Allahabad High Court in a writ petition. While the appeal was pending, the High Court delivered a final judgment in the same matter, thereby rendering the earlier interim order subsumed into the final order. The Supreme Cou…
M/S MAMTA SURGICAL COTTON INDUSTRIES, RAJASTHANversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ANTI-EVASION), BHILWARA, RAJASTHAN
2014 INSC 4723 January 2014Case Partly allowed
M/S Mamta Surgical Cotton Industries, a dealer under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, purchased raw cotton and processed it into surgical cotton. The assessing authority taxed the surgical cotton at 4% for AY 1992-93, treating it as a separate commodity, and the Rajasthan Tax Board upheld this view for AY 1993-94 to 1998-9…
SHRI RAJENDRA RAMCHANDRA KAVALEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2009 INSC 5723 January 2009Disposed off
The appellant, Rajendra Ramchandra Kavalekar, was accused of obtaining a forged degree from Ranchi University in collusion with university officials and using it to secure employment with ITDC. The CBI filed a case in Ranchi, Jharkhand, under sections 120(b), 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d…
M/S. COCHIN PORT TRUSTversusSTATE OF KERALA
2015 INSC 34322 April 2015Dismissed
The Cochin Port Trust, a statutory authority under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, was assessed sales tax for its dealings in scrap items such as water, firewood and waste paper. The Trust contended that it was not a "dealer" within the meaning of Section 2(viii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, arguing that…
JAFARIAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2010 INSC 16222 March 2010Disposed off
The petitioner, a Pakistani national, had completed a nine‑year sentence imposed by a Sessions Court but remained detained in Central Jail, Jaipur. He filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 32 and 21 of the Constitution, alleging illegal detention. The State of Rajasthan expressed no objection to his release, and…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusDEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR.
2013 INSC 4822 January 2013Disposed off
The Union of India appealed against a Punjab & Haryana High Court order that directed the government to provide adequate premises for the Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) at Chandigarh and to consider various administrative reforms. The Supreme Court examined the statutory framework of the Recovery of Debts Due to Bankin…
PASUPULETI SIVA RAMAKRISHNA RAOversusSTATE OF A. P. & ORS.
2014 INSC 11820 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The victim, Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao, the president of a lorry workers' union, was attacked in the union office by four accused who, angry over his collection of donations, struck him with a bottle, tied a telephone wire around his neck and strangulated him, and beat him with an iron rod. The trial court convict…
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.versusBHARTI TELETECH LTD.
2014 INSC 3620 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana granted Bharti Teletech Ltd. a sales‑tax exemption under Rule 28A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 for the period 13‑Dec‑1991 to 12‑Dec‑1998, conditioned on the unit maintaining average production for five years after the exemption. After the exemption expired, the Deputy Excise and Tax…
C. I. T. MUMBAIversusM/S. EMPTEE POLY-YARN PVT. LTD.
2010 INSC 5020 January 2010Dismissed
The appellant, C.I.T., Mumbai, challenged the assessment that the twisting and texturising of partially oriented yarn (POY) did not constitute "manufacture" under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court examined expert testimony that POY is a semi‑finished yarn which, after undergoing a thermo‑mechanical pr…
DEEPAK RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2013 INSC 63819 September 2013Disposed off
The appellants Jagat Rai, Deepak Rai and Bachcha Babu Rai were convicted for the pre‑meditated murder of an informant, his wife and five children by locking them in a house and setting it ablaze, motivated by the informant's refusal to withdraw an FIR. The trial court sentenced all three to death, a decision affirmed b…
BALAJI GUNTHU DHULEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 40919 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Balaji Gunthu Dhule was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the death of Ranga Rao during a quarrel, based primarily on the testimony of several eye‑witnesses. The High Court upheld the conviction relying chiefly on PW‑10’s testimony and the appellant’s own statement under CrPC section 313, inferring that PW‑10…
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RAJASTHANversusM/S BINANI CEMENT LTD. & ANR.
2014 INSC 11219 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Binani Cement Ltd., set up a new cement plant in Rajasthan and claimed a Fixed Capital Investment (FCI) of Rs.532.52 crores, seeking exemption from sales tax under the "Sales Tax New Incentive Scheme for Industries, 1989". The State Level Screening Committee granted only a 25% exemption, treating the un…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusJAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD.
2013 INSC 70718 October 2013Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh Government, under Section 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, issued a notification granting a tax rebate on cement containing fly‑ash, but only to units located within Uttar Pradesh. Cement manufacturers in neighboring states, who purchased fly‑ash from Uttar Pradesh but produced cement outsi…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARATversusGUJARAT FLUORO CHEMICALS
2013 INSC 63318 September 2013Matter referred to larger bench
The petitioner, Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat, challenged the claim of the respondent, Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals, that the Revenue should pay interest when the total of advance tax and TDS installments paid exceeds the assessed tax. The issue centered on whether the Revenue is liable to pay interest on the excess …
PUSHPANJALI SAHUversusSTATE OF ORISSA & ANR.
2012 INSC 40818 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved a matron employed at a government women’s college hostel who alleged that the hostel night‑watchman raped her. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to seven years’ imprisonment; the Sessions Court affirmed this sentence. The High Court, exe…
SELVARAJversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2015 INSC 58018 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Selvaraj, a former First Division Assistant in the District Treasury, Hassan, was alleged to have demanded a bribe of Rs.200 from a complainant who later died before trial. The prosecution relied on a trap operation and the recovery of money allegedly from the appellant's possession, but the complainant …
NARAYAN CHANDRA GHOSHversusUCO BANK & ORS.
2011 INSC 22218 March 2011Disposed off
Narayan Chandra Ghosh, a borrower, appealed to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The Tribunal exempted him from the mandatory pre‑deposit of 50% of the debt, as required by the second proviso of Section 18, and the Calcutta High Court set aside t…
RANJAN DWIVEDIversusC.B.I., THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
2012 INSC 34217 August 2012Dismissed
The petitioners, accused in the 1975 Samastipur bomb‑blast case, sought quashing of the trial on the ground that a 37‑year delay violated their right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court examined the jurisprudence on speedy trial, noting that the right is implicit in Article 21 and …
TATA STEEL LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2015 INSC 22417 March 2015Disposed off
Tata Steel and its subsidiary TISCO operate captive coal mines in Jharkhand. The dispute concerned whether royalty under Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 should be levied on raw Run‑of‑Mine (ROM) coal extracted at the pit‑head or on the beneficiated coal removed from the leased…
SHRI KRISHAN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2014 INSC 100816 September 2014Dismissed
The petitioners, canteen workers at the Mess/Canteen of the S&T Training Centre of Northern Railway, sought regularisation as railway employees, claiming they worked in a non‑statutory recognised canteen. The Central Administrative Tribunal held they were employed in a non‑statutory non‑recognised canteen because no sa…
VIKASversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2013 INSC 54016 August 2013Disposed off
The appellant, Vikash, was implicated in an abduction case where a girl was allegedly kidnapped by several accused. The trial court, after taking cognizance under sections 363, 366(A), 1208 and 376 of the IPC, issued a non‑bailable warrant to secure his attendance under section 319 of the CrPC. Vikash applied to have t…
UNION OF INDIAversusFACULTY ASSOCIATION OF ALLMS
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 165116 January 2014Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained review petitions filed by the Union of India challenging its earlier decision on reservation in faculty posts at AIIMS. The issue centered on whether Articles 15, 16 and 335 of the Constitution permit reservation in super‑specialty faculty positions. The Court clarified that the power to d…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSHOBHA RAM
2013 INSC 3716 January 2013Disposed off
The State of Rajasthan prosecuted two brothers, A-1 and A-2, for murdering Trilokchand under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, alleging a long‑standing dispute over a well. The trial court, relying on the sole eye‑witness PW‑6, convicted both brothers, holding that A‑1 threw stones while A‑2 sat on the victim’s chest, th…
ABDUL BASIT @ RAJU & ORS. ETC.versusMD. ABDUL KADIR CHAUDHARY & ANR.
2014 INSC 100515 September 2014Disposed off
The petitioners were granted bail by the Gauhati High Court under the default bail provision of Section 167(2) CrPC. The respondent sought cancellation of that bail alleging misrepresentation and that the direction to the CID under Section 173(8) did not render the charge‑sheet infructuous. The High Court entertained a…
MAHARAJI EDUCATIONAL TRUSTversusSGS CONSTRUCTION & DEV. P. LTD. & ORS
2015 INSC 43215 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Maharaji Educational Trust, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and HUDCO appealed against a Lucknow High Court order that directed the Parishad to demarcate 42.45 acres of mortgaged land and to declare 21 acres as unencumbered, based on a sale agreement with SGS Construction. The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacke…
SHABNAMversusSTATE OF U. P.
2015 INSC 99915 May 2015Dismissed
The appellants, Shabnam and Saleem, were convicted under IPC s.302 read with s.34 for the pre‑planned murder of seven members of Shabnam's family, including a ten‑month‑old infant. The trial court sentenced them to death, a decision affirmed by the High Court. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the case qual…
S. SURESHversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2009 INSC 113514 September 2009Appeal(s) allowed
S. Suresh, a 25‑year‑old lorry driver, lost his right leg below the knee in a road accident. He claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Commissioner awarded Rs 5,20,584, finding a 100% loss of earning capacity as a driver. The insurer appealed; the Karnataka High Court reduced the award…
MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2015 INSC 41014 May 2015Disposed off
The Madras Bar Association challenged several provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), alleging that their constitution and the qualifications for members violated the basic structure of the Constitution. The Supr…
SAVITRI DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2015 INSC 40914 May 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined challenges to land acquisitions in Noida and Greater Noida made under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where the State invoked Section 17’s urgency provisions to dispense with the Section 5A objection right. The High Court had held the urgency invocation illegal but, because substantial develo…
BASANTI PRASADversusTHE CHAIRMAN,BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD AND OTHERS
2009 INSC 81314 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a widow, sought retirement benefits for her deceased husband who had been an Assistant with the Bihar School Examination Board. He was convicted in 1989 under several IPC sections for tampering with examination marks and was dismissed from service in 1992 on the basis of that conviction. While his crimin…
SANJIV RAJENDRA BHATTversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2015 INSC 76713 October 2015Dismissed
Senior IPS officer Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking transfer of investigations into two criminal cases to the CBI or a fresh Special Investigation Team (SIT), alleging that he was present at a 2002 Gujarat meeting, that the Court‑appointed SIT leaked confidential material, and that hi…
M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA
2011 INSC 76113 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Grasim Industries, a manufacturer of white cement, repaired its plant machinery between 1995 and 1999, generating metal scrap and iron waste. The revenue authorities demanded excise duty and penalties on the scrap, treating it as an excisable good under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal held that the scrap did not a…
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAMversusHINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND ORS.
2015 INSC 2613 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether an Official Liquidator, appointed to wind up Premier Cable Company Ltd., qualifies as a "dealer" under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and consequently bears sales tax liability on the auction sale of the company's assets. The Court held that the liquidator, by stepping into th…
R.B. RAMLINGAMversusR.B. BHUVANESWARI
2009 INSC 3113 January 2009Hearing Adjourned
The petitioner filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) 568 days after the Madras High Court judgment of 18 September 2006, claiming the delay was caused by the pendency of a review application filed within the prescribed period. The central issue was whether the prosecution of a review proceeding could be considered a "su…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - ILLversusM/S.CALCUTTA KNITWEARS, LUDHIANA
2014 INSC 18612 March 2014Dismissed
The case concerned a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act on two premises of the Bhatia Group, which led the assessing officer to record a satisfaction note under Section 15880 on 15 July 2005, after the block assessment of the searched person was completed on 30 March 2005. The respondent, M/s Calcutta Knitw…
THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, U.P. AND UTTARAKHANDversusALLAHABAD BANK AND ORS.
2013 INSC 15312 March 2013Disposed off
The Official Liquidator of a company in liquidation challenged the setting aside of an auction and sale of the company's assets that had been conducted by a Recovery Officer under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (ROB Act). The Company Judge of the High Court had intervened, nulli…
ORISSA PRIVATE MEDICAL & DENTAL COLLEGES ASSOCIATION, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANversusCHAIRMAN, ORISSA JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION- 2011 AND ORS.
2011 INSC 79111 November 2011Disposed off
The Orissa Private Medical & Dental Colleges Association appealed to the Supreme Court seeking a direction that the Chairman of the Orissa Joint Entrance Examination 2011 (OJEE‑11) conduct further counseling for 624 candidates on the waiting list to fill eight vacant seats in private medical colleges belonging to the a…
H.G. RANGANGOUDversusM/S. STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ORS.
2011 INSC 79211 November 2011Appeal(s) allowed
H.G. Rangangoud applied for a mining lease which was later reserved by the Central Government in favour of State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. The Karnataka High Court, through a single judge, quashed the reservation. Before filing an appeal, Rangangoud informed the State Government of the order and sought its impl…
DINESHAN K.K.versusR.K. SINGH & ANR.
2014 INSC 18111 March 2014
The petitioner obtained a writ from the Gauhati High Court directing the Union of India to re‑designate him as a Warrant Officer and extend his pay. The Union appealed to the Supreme Court (Civil Appeal No. 25 of 2008), which dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the High Court’s directions. The petitioner later file…
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusJSS MEDICAL COLLEGE & ANR.
2012 INSC 1511 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Medical Council of India (MCI) appealed against a Karnataka High Court interim order that allowed JSS Medical College to admit 200 MBBS students for 2011‑12, despite the Board of Governors of the MCI having rejected the college’s application for increase of seats. The college had originally applied for an increase …
MOHD. HUSSAIN @ JULFIKAR ALIversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI
2012 INSC 1611 January 2012Matter referred to larger bench
An explosion on a Delhi bus in 1997 killed four people and injured twenty‑four. Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali, a Pakistani national, was charged under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 3 of the Explosives Substances Act and was convicted and sentenced to death. The trial proceeded for years with the accused largely unre…
M/S PURBANCHAL CABLES & CONDUCTORS PVT. LTDversusASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANOTHER
2012 INSC 28010 July 2012Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered two appeals by suppliers of aluminium conductors against the Assam State Electricity Board concerning claims for interest on delayed payments under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993. The Court held that a suit seeking only intere…
DENEL (PROPRIETARY LIMITED)versusBHARAT ELECTRONICS LTD. & ANR.
2010 INSC 30410 May 2010Case Allowed
Denel (Proprietary) Ltd., a South African government-owned company, supplied electronic equipment to Bharat Electronics Ltd., a Government of India enterprise, under several purchase orders. After delivering the goods, Denel demanded payment of GBP 34,894.75, but Bharat Electronics refused, citing a Ministry of Defence…
NAND KISHORE OJHAversusANJANI KUMAR SINGH
2009 INSC 12939 December 2009Hearing Adjourned
The Supreme Court examined a contempt petition filed by Nano Kishore Ojha against the State of Bihar for failing to honour undertakings given on 18 January 2006 and 7 February 2007 to appoint all trained primary‑school teachers to vacant posts. Earlier High Court and Supreme Court orders (1996, 1997) had directed the S…
MOFIL KHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND
2014 INSC 10169 October 2014Dismissed
Mofil Khan and two co‑accused brutally murdered eight members of their own family, including women, children and a physically disabled boy, to obtain property. The trial court sentenced them to death, a decision affirmed by the Jharkhand High Court. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the "rarest of rare" doc…
VIKAS PRATAP SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS.
2013 INSC 4519 July 2013Disposed off
The Chhattisgarh Police recruited 380 officers through a competitive exam, publishing a first merit list in April 2008 that included the 26 appellants. After complaints about defects in eight objective questions and eight erroneous model answers, the Professional Examination Board re‑evaluated the scripts, deleted the …
D.M. PREMKUMARIversusTHE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MYSORE DIVISION & ORS.
2009 INSC 1299 February 2009Disposed off
D.M. Premkumari, a member of the Telugu Shetty community, was appointed as a primary school teacher in 1994 under the Group B reservation category as per the Karnataka Government's 1986 classification order. Later verification revealed that her caste, Telugu Balija, had been re‑classified to Group D, making her ineligi…
SUNIL BHARTI MITTALversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2015 INSC 189 January 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a Special Judge could summon individuals who were not named in the CBI charge‑sheet in the 2G spectrum case, on the basis that they were the "alter ego" of the companies charged. The Court held that while a magistrate may summon a non‑named person if prima facie material exists, the S…
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusRAFIQ MASIH (WHITE WASHER)
2014 INSC 4798 July 2014
The State of Punjab filed a Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court order that barred recovery of excess pensionary payments made to the respondent, a white washer, on the ground that the employee had not committed fraud. The Supreme Court examined the apparent conflict between earlier decisions: Shyam Babu Ver…
PURUSHOTIAM DASHRATH BORATE &ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2015 INSC 3928 May 2015Dismissed
The accused, a cab driver and his accomplice, abducted a young woman who was a night‑shift employee, gang‑raped her and murdered her in a pre‑planned, brutal manner. The prosecution proved the crime through a chain of circumstantial evidence, forensic findings and confessional statements, leading to convictions under I…
KATHI BHARAT VAJSUR & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2012 INSC 2158 May 2012Dismissed
The case involved an armed altercation in which three accused (A1, A2, A3) fired pistols and used an axe, resulting in the death of Mulu Dada and serious injury to Jagu Dada. The trial court acquitted all three, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, but the Gujarat High Court reversed t…
VOLTAS LTD.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2015 INSC 2908 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Voltas Ltd. entered into a works contract to fabricate and install a water‑chilling plant for Anupam Colours & Chemicals. The Gujarat tax authority classified the contract under Entry 2 of the 1993 Notification, levying a 15% composition tax, whereas Voltas argued it fell under Entry 5, attracting only 5%. The High Cou…
KHENYEIversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2015 INSC 3897 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved claimants injured in a collision between a bus and a trailer‑truck. The bus was insured by New India Assurance Co., while the trailer‑truck was uninsured. The High Court had limited the insurer's liability to one‑third of the award, based on a 1/3‑2/3 split of negligence between the drivers. The Supre…
MAJOR SAURABH CHARAN AND OTHERS ETC.versusLT. GOVERNOR, NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS ETC.
2014 INSC 3697 May 2014Disposed off
The appellants, whose children were admitted to private unaided schools in Delhi under a 18‑December‑2013 notification that awarded points for inter‑state transfer, had their admissions threatened when the Delhi Administration issued a 27‑February‑2014 notification deleting the inter‑state transfer points and re‑orient…
ANGANA & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2009 INSC 1126 February 2009Disposed off
The appellants Angana and others were convicted under IPC s.326 read with s.34 and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. They had been on bail during the trial, and most co‑accused were acquitted. While their appeal was pending before the High Court, they filed an application under Section 389 of the CrPC see…
NARINDER SINGH ARORAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.
2011 INSC 8335 December 2011Disposed off
The appellant filed a complaint in 1988 leading to an FIR and charges under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B, 34 and 302 of the IPC. The trial was initially assigned to Additional Sessions Judge S.N. Dhingra, who on 25 September 2000 recused himself for personal reasons and the case was transferred to another judge, resulting in …
ALL KERALA ONLINE LOTTERY DEALERS ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2015 INSC 8315 November 2015Dismissed
The State of Kerala issued notifications prohibiting the sale of computerized and online lottery tickets while permitting paper lotteries, which the All Kerala Online Lottery Dealers Association and others challenged as discriminatory under Section 5 of the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998. The petitioners argued that …
INDO COURT CHOONDNAM, EMPLOYEES UNION &ANR.versusREGISTRAR (BOMBAY INDUSTRIAL RELATION ACT) & ANR.
2009 INSC 6755 May 2009Disposed off
The appellant employees' union challenged the registration of another employees' union before the Industrial Court under Section 20 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act. The Industrial Court cancelled the appellant's registration and directed registration of the respondent union, which had not filed an application un…
BABLA @ DINESHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2012 INSC 3734 September 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Babla @ Dinesh, was convicted by a trial court and sentenced to life imprisonment under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC for a murder committed on 1‑12‑1991. He contended that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, but the High Court rejected the plea on the ground that it was not raised before the…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusM/S NITDIP TEXTILE PROCESSORS PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER
2011 INSC 7823 November 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, manufacturers of textile fabrics, were found to have cleared goods without paying excise duty and were served a show‑cause notice on 6 January 1999. They sought relief under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, which allowed settlement of tax arrears quantified or notified on or before 31 March 1998, b…
SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2014 INSC 4653 July 2014Case Partly allowed
Santosh Kumar Singh, a 26‑year‑old tutor, entered the home of his employers, assaulted the mother, son and daughters with an iron hammer, and looted jewellery and cash, resulting in the deaths of the mother and son. He was convicted under IPC sections 302, 307, 394, 397 and 450 and sentenced to death, with additional l…
UNION OF INDIAversusV. SRIHARAN @ MURUGAN & ORS.
2015 INSC 8862 December 2015Reference answered
The case arose from the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, for which several accused were convicted and sentenced to death, later commuted to life imprisonment by the Supreme Court. The State of Tamil Nadu proposed to remit the life sentences of the convicts, prompting the Union of India to file a wri…
M/S P.V.K. DISTILLERY LTD.versusMAHENDRA RAM
2009 INSC 2892 March 2009Case Partly allowed
Mahendra Ram was hired by P.V.K. Distillery Ltd. in 1981, became a permanent workman in 1982, and was terminated orally in 1985. He approached the Labour Court, which held that his termination was illegal, ordered his reinstatement with full back wages, and the High Court affirmed that award. The factory, however, rema…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusSATYAVRATA TARAN
2011 INSC 8291 December 2011Dismissed
The case concerned Assistant Professors appointed on an emergency basis under Rule 13(5) of the Madhya Pradesh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1967, who sought to have their emergency service counted for senior/selection grade pay scales. The respondent, Satyavrata Taran, was regularized afte…
RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDversusNEW PINK CITY NIRMAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD. & ANR.
2015 INSC 3751 May 2015Disposed off
The Rajasthan Housing Board and the original Khatedars appealed against a Division Bench order that granted the New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. (the Society) a right to compensation and 25% of the developed land after the State acquired the land under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953. The Court held th…
NAND KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2012 INSC 631 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Nano Kumar Verma, a judicial officer, was first investigated for granting bail in a serious case; after offering explanations, the High Court accepted them and closed the proceedings. Despite this, the High Court later initiated fresh departmental proceedings on the same charges, reverted him to a lower post, and subse…