Created byFuzzy Cloud| Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
731 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 601–731.
The State of Gujarat filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award dated 7 October 2023 that ordered reinstatement of a former watchman, Dineshbhai Chaudhary, with 50% back wages. The petitioner argued that the award was erroneous, noting that the resp…
The State of Gujarat, represented by the Range Forest Officer, filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% backwages to a former watchman who was allegedly dismissed arbitrarily. The petit…
The workman, appointed as a Data Entry Operator in 2008, voluntarily resigned in December 2019 and received a relieving letter and leave encashment. He later claimed his resignation was forced and sought reinstatement, leading to an industrial dispute before the Labour Court, which partially allowed the claim and order…
The petitioner, a retired army officer who had run a proprietorship supplying manpower, ceased operations in 2016 and the establishment was located in an ESI‑exempt area. After paying a contribution demand for 2013‑2015, the ESI Corporation issued a C‑18 notice in 2022 and, without inspection, raised a demand of Rs.48,…
The petitioner, a former employee of Blue Dart Express Ltd., challenged a Labour Court award of Rs.1,50,000 lump‑sum compensation granted after his termination in 2004, invoking Article 226 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act. He argued that the award was contrary to law and insufficient for his 13 year…
The petition filed by Manager, Oswal Industries Ltd under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenged a Labour Court award that had reinstated a workman and ordered 50% back wages. The workman had been terminated on 3 October 2017 after alleged non‑payment of overtime and was said to have abandoned his post, bu…
The Gondal Nagarpalika terminated two valve‑men in December 2000 without notice. The workmen filed references before the Rajkot Labour Court in 2011, over eleven years after termination. The Labour Court allowed the references, ordering reinstatement with 20% back wages and expenses. The Nagarpalika challenged the awar…
The Gondal Nagarpalika terminated two valve‑men in December 2000 without notice. The workmen filed references before the Rajkot Labour Court in 2011, over eleven years after termination. The Labour Court allowed the references, ordering reinstatement with 20% back wages and expenses. The Nagarpalika challenged the awar…
Udabhai Surthabhai Pateliya, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged an award dated 05‑01‑2022 (later referred to as 13‑05‑2022) passed by the Labour Court, Godhra, seeking reinstatement with continuity of service but no back wages. The petition was filed under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Con…
The employee, Bhathibhai Nathabhai Talar, challenged an award dated 05.01.2022 passed by the Labour Court, Godhra, which granted only lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement. He filed a petition under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking reinstatement wit…
Javedhusen Salimbhai Qureshi filed special civil applications against Torrent Power Limited in the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner raised office objections in the proceedings. The court directed that these office objections must be removed within eight weeks. It warned that failure to do so would result in automatic…
The employee, Bhathibhai Ratnabhai Pagi, challenged a Labour Court award dated 13 May 2022 that granted reinstatement without back wages. The employer and the State filed separate petitions under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The High Court examined earlier coor…
The applicants, a group of workmen represented by the President of Gujarat Mazdoor Mahjan, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of Special Civil Application No. 28480 of 2025 and condonation of a 42‑day delay in filing the restoration petition. The learned counsel explained the reasons for the de…
The hospital (petitioner) challenged two orders dated 19.05.2025 of the Vadodara Labour Court that rejected its application to be represented by an advocate under Section 36(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act and refused an adjournment. The dispute arose from the termination of the work‑woman (respondent) who had been e…
The employee, Bhathibhai Nathabhai Talar, challenged an award dated 05.01.2022 passed by the Labour Court, Godhra, which granted only lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement. He filed a petition under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking reinstatement wit…
The employee, Bhathibhai Ratnabhai Pagi, challenged a Labour Court award dated 13 May 2022 that granted reinstatement without back wages. The employer and the State filed separate petitions under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The High Court examined earlier coor…
Udabhai Surthabhai Pateliya, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged an award dated 05‑01‑2022 (later referred to as 13‑05‑2022) passed by the Labour Court, Godhra, seeking reinstatement with continuity of service but no back wages. The petition was filed under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Con…
The petitioner, represented by Ms. Rutvi Modi and Mr. Prabhat Singh J. Parmar, sought the court's permission to withdraw the special civil application filed against the respondent. The respondent, Ms. Ashlesha M. Patel, was served notice in the proceedings. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner cou…
The State of Gujarat filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement with 50% back wages to a workman who had been arbitrarily dismissed after nearly eight years of service. The petitioner argued that the workman was not in continuous service a…
Natwarlal Bhatt, appointed as a Ward Servant in 1990, was terminated twice for alleged unsatisfactory work and subsequently filed a reference before the Labour Court seeking reinstatement and back wages. The Labour Court partially reinstated him in 2004 without back wages, an order later remanded by the High Court in 2…
The petitioner, a sweeper employed since 1984, claimed he was terminated on 1 June 2015 without following the procedural safeguards of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and sought reinstatement and back wages. He alleged an injury sustained in the course of duty, but the date of the accident was inconsistent in his st…
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd, a company engaged in dairy and food processing, terminated the services of several long‑serving employees after closing its Anand plant and transferring them to distant locations, which the employees refused to join. The employees accepted terminal dues but later filed industri…
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd, a company engaged in dairy and food processing, terminated the services of several long‑serving employees after closing its Anand plant and transferring them to distant locations, which the employees refused to join. The employees accepted terminal dues but later filed industri…
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd, a company engaged in dairy and food processing, terminated the services of several long‑serving employees after closing its Anand plant and transferring them to distant locations, which the employees refused to join. The employees accepted terminal dues but later filed industri…
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd, a company engaged in dairy and food processing, terminated the services of several long‑serving employees after closing its Anand plant and transferring them to distant locations, which the employees refused to join. The employees accepted terminal dues but later filed industri…
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd, a company engaged in dairy and food processing, terminated the services of several long‑serving employees after closing its Anand plant and transferring them to distant locations, which the employees refused to join. The employees accepted terminal dues but later filed industri…
The petitioner, Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Parekh, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court. The petition was pending for a prolonged period, and the petitioner’s counsel had not appeared before the Court since 2024, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. The Court observed the abse…
The workman alleged that he had been employed as a Jigar Operator since 1995 and was illegally terminated, prompting the Labour Court to award him 50% back wages and retirement benefits. The company contested the award, arguing no employer‑employee relationship existed and that the Labour Court erred in its findings. T…
The workman, who claimed to have worked for eight years as a Jigar Operator, alleged illegal termination by Ganesh Laxmi Processors Pvt. Ltd. The Labour Court reinstated him with 50% back wages, and the Industrial Tribunal upheld that award. The company challenged these orders via a writ petition under Articles 226 and…
Himanshu Chokshi filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court against the State of Gujarat and others, seeking relief. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition to pursue an appropriate remedy elsewhere. The Court, after hearing, granted the petitioner's request to withdraw t…
The State of Gujarat filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award dated 10‑04‑2018 that ordered reinstatement of a watchman, Narvatbhai Mohanbhai Bariya, without back wages. The respondent had been employed from 1993 to 1997, earning Rs.700 per month, and was dismisse…
The GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute terminated a driver, Bhavsar Kanubhai Rasikbhai, after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of refusing a transfer, using abusive language and threatening a superior. The Labour Court upheld the inquiry but nonetheless ordered his reinstatement with 40% back wages.…
The petitioner, a watchman employed by the State of Gujarat from 2004 to 2011, was terminated without any appointment letter, service book or statutory benefits. He filed an industrial dispute before the Labour Court, which awarded him a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 60,000 but denied reinstatement or back wages. The pet…
The petitioner, a watchman who served from 1988 to 2011 without formal appointment documents, was arbitrarily dismissed on 1 July 2011. He filed an industrial dispute before the Labour Court, but died in 2019; his legal heirs continued the case. The Labour Court awarded a lump‑sum compensation of Rs.50,000 to the heirs…
The petitioner, a watchman employed by the State of Gujarat from October 2007 to July 2011, was terminated without any appointment letter, service book or statutory benefits and without following due procedure. He filed an industrial dispute before the Labour Court, which awarded him a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 60,00…
The petitioner, a watchman employed by the State of Gujarat from 2010 to August 2015, was terminated orally without any appointment letter, service book or statutory benefits. He challenged the Labour Court's award of a Rs 60,000 lump‑sum compensation and denial of reinstatement under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti…
Kalubhai Shukkarbhai Kalat, a watchman employed by the State of Gujarat from July 2010 to August 2015, was terminated orally without any appointment letter, service book, or statutory benefits. He challenged the Labour Court's award of a Rs 60,000 lump‑sum compensation (without reinstatement) under Articles 226 and 227…
The petitioner, a watchman employed by the State of Gujarat from 2004 to July 2011, was terminated without due procedure, lacking any appointment letter or statutory benefits. He filed an industrial dispute before the Labour Court, which awarded him a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 60,000 but denied reinstatement. The pet…
The petitioner, a range forest officer, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that reinstated a former watchman with backwages. The workman had been dismissed orally after six years of service, and the Labour Court had partially allowed his claim, ordering reinstatement…
The State of Gujarat, through a Range Forest Officer, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that granted a watchman a lump‑sum compensation of Rs.75,000 without reinstatement after his alleged arbitrary discharge. The petitioner argued that the award was errone…
The State of Gujarat filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award dated 7 October 2023 that ordered reinstatement with 50% backwages for a watchman dismissed arbitrarily in 2015. The petitioner argued that the employee had not completed the requisite …
The respondent, a watchman employed for four years, was arbitrarily dismissed without due procedure. He filed an industrial dispute before the Labour Court, which awarded reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% backwages. The State of Gujarat challenged this award under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution…
The petitioner, Jayeshbhai Ratilal Mehta, filed a special civil application against the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and another respondent. Respondent No.1, Mr. Hardeep L. Mahida, claimed that the amount directed by the Controlling Authority, Ahmedabad, had already been deposited. The petitioner’s counsel s…
M/s Rinkoo Processors Ltd. filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, seeking to quash a daily order dated 12‑01‑2026 issued by the Deputy Director, ESIC, Ahmedabad, which was based on alleged non‑production of documents and threatened …
The petitioner, a former employee of J B and Brothers Pvt Ltd, was terminated when the company closed down and filed for gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, claiming Rs 1,33,903 with 10% simple interest. The Controlling Authority initially rejected his claim, but on remand allowed Rs 1,08,692 with interest. The…
The petitioner, Gurukrupa Travels Agency, filed a Special Civil Application but later decided not to pursue the matter. Counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Hon'ble Justice Hemant M. Prachchak granted the request, allowing the petition to be withdrawn. The Court express…
The Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (petitioner) challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Bhavnagar dated 22‑02‑2022 which directed it to pay back wages to workman Ramankumar (respondent) from 01‑01‑2000. The respondent, a conductor, had been habitually absent without leave and claimed salary for period…
The Employees Provident Fund Organisation and others filed a review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of the CPC seeking to set aside the High Court's order dated 28‑11‑2025 in Special Civil Application No. 270/2025. They alleged that the earlier counsel failed to produce relevant documents, resulting in factual and legal…
The Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (petitioner) challenged an order of the Appellate Authority dated 18‑July‑2024 which returned its gratuity appeal on the grounds that it was filed beyond the 120‑day limitation and without the required payment challan. The workman, appointed in 1985 and retired in 2020 after …
The applicants filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking condonation of a 16‑day delay in filing a review petition against an order dated 28‑Nov‑2025 in Special Civil Application No. 270 of 2025. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that the delay was unexplained. The court examined the averments made…
M/S Soft Age Information Technology Ltd filed special civil applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, invoking the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to challenge orders of the Ahmedabad Labour Court that rejected its applications for condonation of delay in restoring industrial dispute references. The c…
M/S Soft Age Information Technology Ltd filed special civil applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, invoking the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to challenge orders of the Ahmedabad Labour Court that rejected its applications for condonation of delay in restoring industrial dispute references. The c…
M/S Soft Age Information Technology Ltd filed special civil applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, invoking the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to challenge orders of the Ahmedabad Labour Court that rejected its applications for condonation of delay in restoring industrial dispute references. The c…
M/S Soft Age Information Technology Ltd filed special civil applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, invoking the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to challenge orders of the Ahmedabad Labour Court that rejected its applications for condonation of delay in restoring industrial dispute references. The c…
The petitioner, a workman employed as a Rojamdar Labourer from 2005 to 2008, was terminated orally in December 2008. He raised an industrial dispute, and the Labour Court awarded him a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 30,000 but denied reinstatement with back wages, finding the termination violated Section 25(F) of the Indu…
The petitioner, a Junior Fireman employed by IPCL (later merged into Reliance Industries), was terminated for alleged unauthorized absence of 92 days in 2001. He claimed the absences were due to family emergencies involving a mentally ill brother and that the disciplinary inquiry denied him a fair chance to present evi…
The Torrent Power Surat Electricity Company Employees Union filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging an order dated 09‑05‑2025 of the Surat Industrial Court that rejected its request for production of documents. The Union argued that the Industrial Court erred in not considering…
Petitioner Shakti Erectors, through counsel Mr. Ammar Saiyed, applied to withdraw two special civil applications, alleging that it was not properly heard and that notice issued in the reference was not served, depriving it of an opportunity to file a written statement. The petitioner sought liberty to file an appropria…
Petitioner Shakti Erectors, through counsel Mr. Ammar Saiyed, applied to withdraw two special civil applications, alleging that it was not properly heard and that notice issued in the reference was not served, depriving it of an opportunity to file a written statement. The petitioner sought liberty to file an appropria…
The petitioner, an employee, filed a cross petition challenging a Labour Court judgment dated 10‑10‑2024 that ordered his reinstatement with continuity of service and 20% backwages. The petitioner contended that a separate suit, Special Civil Application No. 3287 of 2025, had already been decided by this Court, awardin…
The petitioner, Rajkot Jilla Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd, a cooperative dairy, challenged an award dated 18‑03‑2025 of the Industrial Tribunal, Rajkot, which declined to decide a preliminary issue concerning the locus standi of an unrecognised union representing a daily‑wage worker. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus …
Petitioners filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 02.05.2023 issued by the Controlling Authority, Rajkot, under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which directed them to pay Rs.42,695 with 10% simple interest. The High Court observed that the amount …
The State of Gujarat, through the Executive Engineer, filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Controlling Authority dated 20‑04‑2022 that directed the petitioners to pay a gratuity amount of Rs.56,943 with 10% simple interest under the Payment of Grat…
The petitioner, representing the legal heirs of the deceased workman, filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Labour Court order that directed the respondent, Jamnagar Municipal Corporation, to pay Rs.75,000. The High Court examined the petition but noted …
The Jamnagar Municipal Corporation filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court order dated 18‑02‑2022 that directed the respondent to pay Rs.75,000 to the legal heirs of a deceased workman. The petition raised several grounds of challenge, but the High Cou…
The petitioner, Kamdhenu University, filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the award dated 5 April 2023 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Jamnagar, which had ordered the regularisation of a temporary labourer, Gagubhai Pitambarbhai Dhayani, as a field man or Class…
In a Special Civil Application No. 16034 of 2025, petitioner Ramilaben Vimalbhai Parmar sought relief against the State of Gujarat and others, contending that an execution order passed by the Labour Court had not been complied with. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the execution order had already been carried out a…
The petitioner, Dineshbhai Polabhai Khatariya, filed a special civil application and later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Samir B. Gohil, applied for this withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Hemant M. Prachchak granted the request, ordering that the petition stand di…
M/s Steel Strong Valves (I) Pvt Ltd filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Section 7A order of the Employees Provident Funds Act that demanded a lump‑sum PF payment of Rs 67,67,894 without any calculation. The order arose after an enforcement officer found seven employees excluded…
The petitioner, Gujarat Pipavav Port Ltd., terminated the respondent, Rajeshbhai Mehta, following a departmental inquiry that found several charges proved. The respondent challenged the termination before the Labour Court, which later held the inquiry illegal, violated natural justice, and ordered his reinstatement wit…
The petitioner, a permanent driver employed since 1998, was terminated in 2001 without cause and sought statutory benefits. After an unresolved industrial dispute resolution (IDR) proceeding, he filed a reference before the Labour Court, which partially allowed the claim and awarded a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 50,000…
The employer, Shri Muni Arts and Urban Bank Science College, challenged a Labour Court award that ordered the reinstatement of a workman, Govindbhai Nathabhai Rathod, with 20% back wages and service benefits. The workman, originally appointed as a sweeper in 1999 and later terminated orally, claimed entitlement under t…
The petitioner, a permanent helper employed since 1987, was terminated in 2003 after refusing to resign from a newly formed union. He filed a reference before the Labour Court seeking reinstatement with back wages, but the Court rejected his claim, finding he had not satisfied the 240‑day work requirement under Section…
The petitioner, Manager Spencers RP Sanjiv Goenka Group, filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award dated 21‑06‑2024 that ordered its reinstatement of the respondent, Diwan Uvesh Ayubsha, as a customer service associate with back wages. The responde…
The petitioner, AVM Oil Fields Services, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a stay of recovery proceedings initiated by the Employees Provident Fund Organization under a Section 7A order dated 14‑11‑2025. The petition was filed because the appeal against that order is pending before the Cent…
The Factory Manager of Raghuveer Synthetics Ltd filed two Special Civil Applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, invoking Section 33(c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act and Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act respectively, to challenge a Labour Court order dated 01‑09‑2021 and orders of the Co…
Theis Precision Steel India Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging orders dated 08‑07‑2022 that imposed interest under Section 7Q and damages under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The petitioner had already filed an a…
The G.N.F.C. Employees Union filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 14‑A of the Trade Union Act, 1926, challenging three orders dated 18‑May‑2022, 28‑June‑2022 and 1‑Oct‑2022 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour and Deputy Registrar of Trade Union, Vadodara. …
Reliance Industries Ltd filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging a notification dated 03‑12‑2025 and an order dated 31‑12‑2025 issued by the President of the Industrial and Labour Court, Ahmedabad, under Section 33(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio…
The petitioner, a daily‑wage nursery labourer employed since 2000, was orally terminated in June 2018 without notice or retrenchment benefits. He raised an industrial dispute (Reference LCP No. 10 of 2020) before the Labour Court, which awarded a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 1,00,000 in lieu of reinstatement, continuity…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
The State of Gujarat filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an award dated 31 August 2018 made by the Controlling Authority, Valsad, under the Payment of Wages Act. The award required the State to pay the respondent watchman Rs.20,354.40, which was the amount the re…
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The petition was filed und…
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The petition was filed und…
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The petition was filed und…
Petitioners challenged awards of the Valsad Labour Court directing them to pay Rs. 80,560 and costs, alleging the awards were illegal, arbitrary and beyond the Court's jurisdiction, particularly concerning leave encashment and the computation under Section 33C(2) of the applicable labour Act. The petition was filed und…
Ranchhodbhai Lakhabhai Bariya, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 07‑06‑2019 that granted him a lump‑sum compensation instead of reinstatement after his termination. He filed a petition under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes …
Dhirabhai Lalabhai Sangada, a workman in the irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 07‑06‑2019 that granted only lump‑sum compensation after his termination, seeking reinstatement with continuity of service, back wages and retirement benefits under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution …
The petitioner, a workman in the irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 03‑06‑2019 that granted only lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement. Relying on Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, he sought quashing of the award and reinstatement …
Ramabhai Rupabhai Damor, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 1 June 2019 that granted him a lump‑sum compensation instead of reinstatement. He filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,…
The widow of deceased workman Fulabhai Damor filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, challenging a Labour Court award dated 03‑06‑2019 that granted only a lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement or retirement benefits. She so…
JESINGBHAI ARJANBHAI SANGADA, a workman, challenged a Labour Court award dated 04‑06‑2019 that granted only lump‑sum compensation and denied reinstatement. He filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The High Court examined earlier c…
Kesarbhai Khatrabhai Tariyad, a workman in the Gujarat irrigation department, challenged a Labour Court award dated 06‑06‑2019 that granted him lump‑sum compensation instead of reinstatement. He filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 194…
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. The learned counsel su…
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. The learned counsel su…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. The learned counsel su…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. The learned counsel su…
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. The learned counsel su…
The petitioner, Sintex BAPL Limited, filed a series of special civil applications seeking relief. The petitioner argued that multiple Labour Court reference cases (Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for default on 13‑02‑2025 and 18‑02‑2025, rendering the pending petitions moot. The learned counsel su…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
Sintex BAPL Limited filed a series of Special Civil Applications against Thakor Ranputji PunjaJi and others, seeking relief in the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner contended that several reference matters before the Labour Court (Reference Nos. 21 of 2017, 10 of 2020, 13 of 2020, etc.) had been dismissed for defau…
Gokalbai Devraji Tala (Patel) was employed as a sub‑station officer with Rajkot Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd. and was dismissed in December 2013 following a charge‑sheet for alleged misappropriation of a loan amount belonging to a customer, Dineshbhai Tilada. The petitioner challenged the dismissal before the Labour Court…
The workman Kantibhai, employed as a chowkidar from 2007 to 2015, was terminated without due procedure, leading to a reference before the Labour Court which granted reinstatement without backwages. The State of Gujarat filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the Labour Court's award,…
The State of Gujarat filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that reinstated a former Chowkidar, Kantibhai Arjanbhai Bhamat, without backwages. The workman had been employed from 2007‑08 until August 2015 and was terminated without due procedure. The petitioner a…
The State of Gujarat filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the award of the Industrial Court, Rajkot dated 8 March 2022, which had ordered payment of certain benefits to the heirs of a deceased part‑time worker. The worker had been reinstated in 2013 as a part‑timer after earl…
The State of Gujarat filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the award of the Industrial Court, Rajkot dated 8 March 2022, which had ordered payment of certain benefits to the heirs of a deceased part‑time worker. The worker had been reinstated in 2013 as a part‑timer after earl…
Padra Municipality filed petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement of several workmen and payment of back wages. The workmen had been engaged intermittently as casual daily‑wage labourers for drainage sweeping, not on any sanctioned permanent po…
Padra Municipality filed petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement of several workmen and payment of back wages. The workmen had been engaged intermittently as casual daily‑wage labourers for drainage sweeping, not on any sanctioned permanent po…
The petitioners, Ong Mazdoor Sangh, sought relief in a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel indicated that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, noting the petition's futility, disposed of the petition without addressing its merits. No substanti…
Ganga R.K. Industries Pvt. Ltd. filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court award dated 28‑04‑2025 that ordered the reinstatement of a workman with 50% back wages. The workman, originally employed as a temporary clerk‑cum‑supervisor from 01‑04‑2013, was te…
The petitioner, the heir of a deceased work‑charge watchman, filed a petition under Articles 14, 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an award of the Industrial Court that dismissed his claim for a compassionate appointment and imposed exemplary costs of Rs 25,000. The dispute arose from a reference under Sectio…
In a Special Civil Application, petitioner Habibbhai Yusufbhai Varsola claimed that the respondent (the Collector) owed an outstanding amount to his workman. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the respondent had already paid the amount, and the workman had received it, leaving no grievance. The court examined whet…
Chandrikaben Ranchhodbhai Vasava filed a Special Civil Application against the Collector and another respondent seeking recovery of an outstanding amount owed to her workman. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the grievance remained unresolved. The respondents contended that the amount had already been paid to the wo…
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed a special civil application filed by Gondal Nagarpalika after it had earlier been dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner subsequently filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration, which the court allowed on the condition that the petitioner deposit the costs…
Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd (GETCO) challenged an ex‑parte award dated 26 May 2023 passed by the Labour Court, Bhavnagar, which ordered reinstatement of two workmen with 20% back wages. The workmen had raised an industrial dispute over alleged oral terminations in 2013 and 2014, leading to References (L…
Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd (GETCO) challenged an ex‑parte award dated 26 May 2023 passed by the Labour Court, Bhavnagar, which ordered reinstatement of two workmen with 20% back wages. The workmen had raised an industrial dispute over alleged oral terminations in 2013 and 2014, leading to References (L…
The applicant filed a petition seeking condonation of a 61‑day delay in filing a Miscellaneous Civil Application for the restoration of a first appeal that had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 9 July 2025. The court heard arguments from counsel and examined the explanation provided in the application. It found…
The applicant filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking recall of the order dated 09‑10‑2025 in First Appeal No. 2728 of 2005, restoration as respondent No. 6, deletion of respondent No. 10 and addition of a new respondent, and a stay of execution. The applicant alleged that the respondent No. 6 had died, that th…
Solace Engineers (Marketing) Pvt. Ltd. filed a Special Civil Application and a Civil Application for Direction before the Gujarat High Court. The court noted that the advocate notice for the petitioner remained unserved because the company had been closed for a long time, as reported by the bailiff. Consequently, the c…
The State of Gujarat, represented by the Range Forest Officer, filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court order that awarded a compensation of Rs.70,000 to a workman. The petition argued various grounds against the Labour Court's decision. The High Court …
The petitioner, a forest department labourer, was orally terminated in 2005 without notice. He raised the dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, which was referred to the Labour Court (Reference No. 16/2016). The Labour Court, on 15‑02‑2025, rejected the reference on the ground of an eleven‑year delay in fil…
The petitioner, a forest department labourer terminated in 2005 without notice, filed a conciliation proceeding which failed and subsequently raised a reference before the Labour Court in 2016. The Labour Court, on 15‑02‑2025, rejected the reference on the ground of delay, holding that the industrial dispute was stale.…
The State of Gujarat filed a petition challenging the order of the Appellate Authority that upheld a gratuity award of Rs.2,015 to a former workman who had served 33 years. The workman had previously received gratuity for 22 years and sought the balance under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, after the High Court had …
The petitioner filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Labour Court order that required payment of Rs.86,292 with 8% interest and Rs.5,000 costs. The respondents did not appear, and an issue arose regarding an unserved notice to the deceased respondent's wife, …
The State of Gujarat filed a special civil application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 26‑04‑2024 issued by the Controlling Authority, Devbhumi Dhwarka, under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, in Gratuity Case No. 29 of 2023. The dispute concerned a gratuity amount of Rs.40,70…
The heirs of the deceased employee, Virabhai Galabhai Pateliya, filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, challenging a Labour Court award that granted only a lump‑sum compensation instead of reinstatement and continuity of service. The petition …
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
