Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

S S NIJJAR

121 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA

2014 INSC 23531 March 2014Case Allowed

Reliance Industries Ltd., Niko Resources Ltd. and British Petroleum entered into a Production Sharing Contract (PSC) with the Union of India. When a dispute arose over cost recovery, Reliance, acting as the operator, invoked the arbitration clause in Article 33 of the PSC and nominated an arbitrator. Two arbitrators, b

VINODKUMAR M. MALAVIA ETC.versusMAGANLAL MANGALDAS GAMETI & ORS.

2013 INSC 66230 September 2013Dismissed

The case concerned the purported unification of the First District Church of the Brethren (FDCB) with the Church of North India (CNI). The appellants claimed that the unification dissolved FDCB, making CNI its legal successor and entitled to its property, which was held in a public trust regulated by the Bombay Public

PURUSHOTTAMversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2013 INSC 79729 November 2013Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Karnataka High Court order that declared the allotment of Civic Amenity Site No.2, originally earmarked for a bank, to Bharat Petroleum for a petrol pump null and void. The Court examined Section 38A(1) and (2) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, which permit

M/S. PARAGON RUBBER INDUSTRIESversusM/S. PRAGATHI RUBBER MILLS & ORS.

2013 INSC 79829 November 2013Dismissed

The plaintiff, Paragon Rubber Industries, filed a suit in the District Court of Kottayam seeking relief under the Copyright Act, 1957 and the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The defendants challenged the suit's territorial jurisdiction, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction under the 1958 Act. The trial cou

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITIEE A.P. ETC.versusM/S M.K. EXPORTS, A.P. ETC. ETC.

2011 INSC 34529 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Agricultural Market Committee of Andhra Pradesh initiated criminal proceedings against traders of M.K. Exports for non‑payment of market fees that were re‑assessed under Section 12‑8(5) of the A.P. Agricultural (Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966. The traders filed petitions under Section 482 of the Code of C

M/S. GAYATRI PROJECT LTD.versusM/S. SAI KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION

2013 INSC 79028 November 2013Dismissed

Gayatri Project Ltd, the main contractor, and Sai Krishna Construction, its sub‑contractor, entered into a 2001 agreement containing an arbitration clause. The parties later signed a document dated 6 June 2003 that the appellant claimed was a full and final settlement of all disputes, but the respondent did not accept

GURJANT SINGH @ JANTAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 72428 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Gurjant Singh (Janta) was seized with three gunny bags containing poppy husk while riding a tractor trolley. The police officer who stopped the vehicle offered the appellant the right to have the search conducted in the presence of a gazetted officer or magistrate as required by Section 50 of the NDPS Act, and the appe

BEDANGA TALUKDARversusSAIFUDAULLAH KHAN & ORS.

2011 INSC 72128 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Assam Public Service Commission advertised a combined competitive examination with a reservation of 3% for physically disabled candidates. Respondent No.1, a physically disabled applicant, applied under the original advertisement but did not submit the required disability certificate by the stipulated deadline, nor

MANGAL AMUSEMENT PARK (P) LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS

2012 INSC 35528 August 2012Dismissed

The Indore Development Authority (IDA) allotted a 7‑acre parcel of land to Mangal Amusement Park Ltd. for a children's amusement park under a document labeled a "license" for 15 years, with a provision for renewal. The State of Madhya Pradesh later changed the land‑use from "commercial" to "regional park" and directed

NARAYAN MANIKRAO SALGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2012 INSC 35428 August 2012Case Partly allowed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 148, 302 read with 149, 341, and 323 of the IPC for the death of Khushal Salgar. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, a dying declaration, and forensic evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the evidence established a common object to cause mur

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES .LIMITED & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA

2014 INSC 41028 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Reliance Industries and BG Exploration entered into two Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) with the Government of India for oil fields. Disputes arose over royalties, cess, service tax and a CAG audit, leading Reliance to issue a notice of arbitration under Article 33 of the PSCs. The parties agreed that the arbitrati

SWISS TIMING LIMITEDversusORGANISING COMMITTEE, COMMONWEALTH GAMES 2010 DELHI

2013 INSC 36228 May 2013Case Allowed

Swiss Timing Ltd., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the Commonwealth Games 2010 Organising Committee to provide timing and scoring services. The Committee failed to pay the agreed fees, prompting Swiss Timing to invoke the arbitration clause in the agreement. The Committee objected, claiming the contract w

USHA BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2014 INSC 22428 March 2014Dismissed

Usha Bharti, elected as Adhyaksh of the Zila Panchayat, Sitapur, challenged a motion of no confidence moved by 37 members under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayat & Zila Panchayat Act, 1961. The High Court dismissed her writ petition and later her review petition, prompting a Special Leave Petition befo

MADAN LALversusHIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR & ORS.

2014 INSC 94828 March 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeals Nos. 1393‑1394 of 2002 filed by Madan Lal and others, which arose from writ petitions challenging the selection and appointment of District and Sessions Judges under the Jammu and Kashmir Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1983. The appellants did not contest any specific selected

STATE THROUGH C.B.I.versusMAHENDER SINGH DAHIYA

2011 INSC 8028 January 2011Dismissed

The State alleged that Dr. Mahender Singh Dahiya strangulated his wife Namita during their honeymoon in Brussels, dismembered her body and disposed of the parts, while the prosecution failed to produce a weapon, reliable forensic identification of the body parts, or a clear motive. The trial court convicted Dahiya unde

GURPAL SINGHversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

2012 INSC 54427 November 2012Case Partly allowed

Gurpal Singh, a Judicial Magistrate First Class in Rajasthan, was suspended on 20 December 1985 after being arrested in connection with the murder of an advocate. He was acquitted by the trial court in May 2002 and the CBI's appeal was dismissed by the Delhi High Court on 27 September 2005, but his suspension continued

STATE OF ORISSA & ORS.versusSRI JAGABANDHU PANDA

2013 INSC 12727 February 2013Disposed off

Jagabandhu Panda was appointed as Ore Dressing Engineer in 1984. He claimed the post was a cadre position and sought promotion, filing representations soon after joining. The government treated the post as ex‑cadre, later upgrading it temporarily but refusing further promotion. The State appealed the Administrative Tri

M/S. REVA ELECTRIC CAR CO. P. LTD.versusM/S. GREEN MOBIL

2011 INSC 82225 November 2011Disposed off

The parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 25 September 2007 containing an arbitration clause. Although the MOU stipulated a trial period ending 31 December 2007, the petitioner unilaterally extended it until its termination on 25 September 2009, after which the respondent commenced legal proceedin

HUKUM CHAND GUPTAversusDIRECTOR GENERAL, ICAR & ORS.

2012 INSC 42125 September 2012Dismissed

Hukam Chand Gupta, a retired Assistant Administrative Officer of the National Dairy Research Institute, claimed that his pay scale should have been revised in line with the pay scale of Superintendents at the ICAR headquarters and that a junior colleague, J.L.P. Madan, should not have received a higher pay scale. The C

AVINASH SADASHIV BHOSALE (D) THR. LRS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2012 INSC 42325 September 2012Dismissed

Avinash Sadashiv Bhosale, a State Bank of India branch manager, was prosecuted under IPC sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 201 for alleged fraud of Rs 12 crore, but was acquitted by the criminal court. Simultaneously, the bank instituted departmental proceedings under the SBI Officers Service Rules, 1992, charging

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusM/S. AKSHYA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.

2014 INSC 34025 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a voluntary open offer made by Akshya Infrastructure Ltd. under Regulation 11 of the SEBI Takeover Regulations could be withdrawn under Regulation 27 when the offer became economically unviable. The Court held that Regulation 27 applies equally to voluntary and triggered public offers

M/S SESA STERLITE LTD.versusORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMM. & ORS.

2014 INSC 33925 April 2014Dismissed

The appellant, a developer of a single‑unit Special Economic Zone (SEZ), entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Sterlite Energy to obtain electricity for its plant and was directed by the Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission to pay a cross‑subsidy surcharge (CSS) to WESCO, the distribution licensee in t

SRI RAM BUILDERSversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.

2014 INSC 34325 April 2014Dismissed

Sri Ram Builders entered into a BOT agreement with the Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation (MPRTC) to construct a bus‑stand‑cum‑commercial complex on land leased by the Indore Development Authority (IDA). The High Court ordered MPRTC to hand over possession of the land and directed specific performance, but the o

GOHIL JESANGBHAI RAYSANGBHAI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2014 INSC 13725 February 2014Dismissed

The appellants challenged the constitutionality of Section 43 of the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 and the 2008 Gujarat Government Resolution that imposed a premium (initially 80%, later reduced to 40%) on the transfer of agricultural land for non‑agricultural purposes, arguing it violated Article 30

NESAR AHMED & ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2014 INSC 13325 February 2014Dismissed

The petitioners, trained teachers, filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking appointment as Assistant Teachers in Jharkhand government schools in order of seniority and with total age relaxation, invoking the Supreme Court's decision in Ram Vinay Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State of Jharkhand had framed its own re

M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.versusM/S. MOHAN LAL HARBANS LAL BHAYANA

2014 INSC 13025 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Larsen & Toubro (L&T) entered into a main contract with SCOPE and subcontracted work to M/s. Mohan Lal Harbans Lal Bhayana (respondent). The subcontract contained an arbitration clause (Clause 25) for disputes between L&T and the respondent. Subsequent supplementary agreements (1990, 1993, 1995) altered the dispute‑res

AAYUSH BUILDWELL PVT. LTD.versusHARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

2014 INSC 13425 February 2014Disposed off

The appellant, Aayush Buildwell Pvt. Ltd., applied for a half‑acre institutional plot advertised by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) and paid earnest money, but was unsuccessful and had the money refunded. The High Court set aside the allotments made to private respondents, finding procedural irregulariti

NANO KUMARversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 13225 February 2014Dismissed

The appellants were daily‑wage employees of the Bihar Agriculture Produce Marketing Board who had worked for many years and claimed that, under Section 6 of the Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006, they were entitled to be absorbed and regularised as permanent officers. The questions before the Court we

DINUBHAI BOGHABHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2017 INSC 106325 February 2014Disposed off

The father of a slain environmental activist filed a writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation into his son’s murder from the Gujarat police to an independent agency, alleging bias and protection of the accused, who was a sitting MP. The Gujarat High Court, after finding the state investigation unfair, partia

SUSHILA DEVIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2013 INSC 65124 September 2013Disposed off

The petitioners sought Supreme Court monitoring of a CBI investigation into the alleged police encounter killing of Dara Singh, claiming the investigation was incomplete. The CBI had completed its inquiry, filed a charge‑sheet against 16 accused, and the trial had commenced in the Sessions Court. The respondents argued

SHOBHA SINHAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2013 INSC 71323 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Shobha Sinha, an Assistant in the Bihar Government, was dismissed for alleged misconduct in a departmental enquiry concerning a bitumen allotment proposal. The High Court Single Judge set aside the dismissal, citing procedural flaws such as non‑supply of documents and lack of witness examination, and directed the gover

BHEEMRAYAversusSUNEETHA

2013 INSC 64523 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Both parties were minors when they allegedly married. The wife filed two suits—one to restrain the husband from remarrying and another seeking a perpetual injunction against alienation of property, claiming a one‑third share for herself and her daughter. She also filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage A

RAJESH GUPTAversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 5523 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Executive Engineer in Jammu and Kashmir's Rural Engineering Wing, was prematurely retired on the recommendation of a High Powered Review Committee that alleged he owned assets disproportionate to his known income and had issued back‑dated technical sanctions. The appellant challenged the retirement, a

RAM ASHISH DIXITversusCHAIRMAN PURVANCHAL GRAMIN BANK LIMITED AND ANR.

2012 INSC 34622 August 2012Dismissed

Ram Ashish Dixit, an officer of Gorakhpur Kshetriya Gramin Bank, was found guilty of irregularities in loan disbursement and was punished with stoppage of one increment for three years. He was considered for promotion from Junior Management Grade‑I to Middle Management Grade‑II in 1995, 1997 and 1999 but was not promot

BHUSHAN POWER & STEEL LTDversusRAJESH VERMA & ORS.

2014 INSC 30822 April 2014Disposed off

Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. (BPSL) entered into a 2002 MOU with the Odisha State Government, which obliged the State to recommend iron‑ore mining leases for its steel plant. The Supreme Court, in a 2012 appeal, directed the State to act on the MOU for both the Thakurani and Keora areas. While the State complied for Thak

M/S. SEPAL HOTEL PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2014 INSC 30922 April 2014Disposed off

The Municipal Committee framed a Town Planning Scheme in 1975 that required part of Sepal Hotel's land for a road. The hotel owner was served notice to demolish the boundary wall, leading to multiple writ petitions and civil suits. The High Court held the scheme final, but the Supreme Court’s decision in Yogender Pal d

VASU P. SHETTYversusM/S HOTEL VANDANA PALACE & ORS.

2014 INSC 30722 April 2014Dismissed

The borrower defaulted on a loan and the bank, under the SARFAESI Act, took possession of the mortgaged hotel and attempted to sell it by public auction. The auction purchaser, Vasu P. Shetty, obtained the highest bid, but the High Court set aside the sale because the public notice did not give the statutorily required

AMALENDU KUMAR BERA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

2013 INSC 19122 March 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The decree dated 7 August 1969 in a title suit was executed in 2009. The State of West Bengal raised objections under Section 47 of the CPC in 2010 and again in 2011, both of which were dismissed. The State later filed a civil revision challenging the 2010 order and sought condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Li

RISHI KIRAN LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.versusBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KANDLA PORT TRUST & ORS.

2014 INSC 29721 April 2014Dismissed

The Kandla Port Trust cancelled a 2005 tender for lease‑hold plots after a five‑year delay in obtaining Coastal Regulation Zone clearance, prompting the successful bidder, Rishi Kiran Logistics, to claim that a Letter of Intent (LOI) constituted a concluded contract and that the Trust was estopped from cancelling. The

THIMMAREDDY & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 29821 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka charged eight persons with robbery and dacoity under Section 397 read with Section 120‑B IPC, alleging they conspired and used deadly weapons on a KSRTC bus. The trial court acquitted all accused, finding the prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and the identification of the accused was unrelia

J. SUNDRAMMAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2013 INSC 18321 March 2013Disposed off

The appellant, an illiterate widow with two minor children, sought regularisation of a residential plot originally allotted to her deceased husband by the Mysore Urban Development Authority. After making partial payments, she mistakenly underpaid the balance due to illiteracy, leading the Authority to cancel the allotm

STATE OF ASSAMversusRIPA SARMA

2013 INSC 11420 February 2013Dismissed

The State of Assam filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) under Article 136 of the Constitution challenging only the Gauhati High Court's order dismissing its review petition, without challenging the original judgment of the Writ Appeal dated 20 November 2007. The Court examined whether an SLP can be entertained when the

DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. AND ANR.versusDIRECTOR, T & C. PLANNING HARYANA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 79319 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, DLF Universal Ltd. and another, were licensed under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 to develop residential colonies and entered into private agreements with plot and flat buyers that included clauses for extension fees and maintenance charges. The Director, Town and Count

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusM/S. INFORMETICS VALUATION AND RATING PVT. LTD.

2013 INSC 11119 February 2013Dismissed

M/s Informetrics Valuation and Rating Pvt. Ltd. applied to SEBI for registration as a credit rating agency, submitting a chartered accountant's net‑worth certificate based on a bank’s confirmation rather than audited accounts of its promoter. SEBI demanded audited accounts of the promoter for the five years preceding t

UNION OF INDIAversusM/S PAM DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD.

2014 INSC 10618 February 2014Dismissed

The Union of India entered into a contract with PAM Development for constructing an industrial loco shed, which was later terminated for delay and inferior work. The contractor invoked an arbitration clause, and the Calcutta High Court appointed a former judge as sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration a

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSUBHAS KUMAR CHATTERJEE & ORS.

2010 INSC 51917 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Senior Laboratory Assistants in West Bengal sought a higher pay scale, leading to a High Court order granting scale 11. Subsequent pay commissions fixed lower scales, and the State framed statutory rules (ROPA Rules) reflecting those scales. Research Assistants later applied to the State Administrative Tribunal for pay

JATYA PAL SINGH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 26417 April 2013Dismissed

The appellants, former employees of the Overseas Communication Service (OCS), were transferred to Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL) and later to Tata Communications Limited (TCL) after the government's disinvestment. They challenged the termination of their services, arguing that VSNL/TCL was a "State" or "other auth

HARNEK SINGHversusPRITAM SINGH & ORS.

2013 INSC 26017 April 2013Dismissed

Harnek Singh filed a suit claiming he was the adopted son of the deceased Sarup Singh and that a gift deed executed by Sarup Singh in favour of Pritam Singh and Surjan Singh was void. The plaintiff was about 23 years old and married with children at the time of the alleged adoption in 1982. Under the Hindu Adoption and

M/S. INTEGRATED FINANCE CO. LTD.versusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA ETC. ETC.

2013 INSC 47216 July 2013Dismissed

Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, was inspected by the RBI which found multiple violations and issued a circular prohibiting it from accepting deposits. The company, facing profitability problems, proposed a scheme of compromise under Section 391 of the Companies Act to convert deposits into

ARATHI SANDIversusBANDI JAGADRAKSHAKA RAO AND ORS.

2013 INSC 47316 July 2013Dismissed

Arathi Sandi and Sandi Jagadrakshaka Rao, a married couple residing in the United States, fought a divorce and child‑custody dispute. The US Superior Court initially granted primary custody of their US‑citizen son to the mother, later modifying the order to make the father the custodial parent and issuing a writ of hab

M/S. JINDAL STAINLESS LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 21516 April 2010Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioners, including M/s. Jindal Stainless Ltd., challenged the validity of various State entry tax statutes on the ground that they violated Articles 301, 302, 303 and 304 of the Constitution. The Division Bench observed that several High Courts had treated Article 304(a) and 304(b) as independent, concluding th

UNION OF INDIAversusFACULTY ASSOCIATION OF ALLMS

[2014] 14 S.C.R. 165116 January 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained review petitions filed by the Union of India challenging its earlier decision on reservation in faculty posts at AIIMS. The issue centered on whether Articles 15, 16 and 335 of the Constitution permit reservation in super‑specialty faculty positions. The Court clarified that the power to d

TULIP STAR HOTELS LTD.versusSPECIAL DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT

2014 INSC 2916 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Tulip Star Hotels Ltd. and its Executive Director were alleged to have sold US$147,000 and £1,000 to Hotel Zam Zam in 1997 through persons not authorized under the RBI's Foreign Exchange Management (FLM) memorandum, violating sections 6(4), 6(5), 7 and 8 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) and paragraph

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAversusVINEETA SHARMA & ANR.

2013 INSC 25215 April 2013Disposed off

The husband instituted two suits before the Family Court—one for divorce and another seeking permanent and temporary injunctions restraining the wife from entering the matrimonial home, in which an ex parte ad interim injunction was granted. The wife prayed for consolidation of the two suits, but the Family Court rejec

J. RAJIV SUBRAMANIYAN & ANR.versusM/S. PANDIYAS & ORS.

2014 INSC 19614 March 2014Disposed off

The borrowers (respondent Nos. 1 and 2) defaulted on loans from State Bank of India, leading the bank to invoke the SARFAESI Act and issue demand and possession notices. The bank later approved a private‑treaty sale of the mortgaged immovable assets to the appellants for a consideration barely above the reserve price.

ENERCON (INDIA) LTD. & ORS.versusENERCON GMBH & ANR.

2014 INSC 10014 February 2014Disposed off

The parties to a joint venture executed an Intellectual Property License Agreement (IPLA) containing an arbitration clause, but the appellants argued that the IPLA was not a concluded contract and therefore no arbitration agreement existed. The Supreme Court held that the arbitration clause is separable from the underl

KASHMIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2013 INSC 83213 December 2013Disposed off

The appellants challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Collector and affirmed by the Additional District Judge for land acquired under a 2001 Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in Tohana, Fatehabad, Haryana. They argued that the market value should be enhanced beyond the assess

H. P. SCHEDULED TRIBES EMPLOYEES FEDERATION & ANR.versusHIMACHAL PRADESH S. V. K. K. & ORS.

2013 INSC 61813 September 2013Case Allowed

The petitioners, representing Scheduled Tribes employees, sought a direction that Himachal Pradesh implement its own policy of reservation in promotions with consequential seniority under the 85th Constitutional Amendment, relying on data already collected. The State argued that implementation should be deferred pendin

RAMESH AHLUWALIAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2012 INSC 39413 September 2012Disposed off

Ramesh Ahluwalia, an administrative officer of the private unaided DAV Public School, was removed from service following a disciplinary inquiry in which the principal, who also acted as a management witness, participated. Ahluwalia challenged the removal by filing a writ petition under Article 226, contending that the

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2012 INSC 17313 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Sub‑Inspector of Uttar Pradesh Police, was ordered to withhold his integrity certificate for 2010 on the ground that he failed to record the past criminal history of an accused in a bailable offence. He challenged the order, arguing that withholding the certificate was not a punishment contemplated und

CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR & OTHERSversusBHARAT CHANDRA BEHERA & ANOTHER

2013 INSC 82612 December 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The National Aluminium Company Ltd. (NALCO) had a scheme to provide employment to persons displaced by its land acquisition. The deceased brother of the petitioner, Trilochan Behera, was appointed as a mazdoor under this "land displaced persons" scheme and later died in a road accident. The petitioner sought a similar

PHATU ROCHIRAM MULCHANDANIversusKARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ORS.

2014 INSC 18512 March 2014Dismissed

The appellant, a promoter/shareholder of Relectronics Ltd., challenged the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board’s termination of a lease‑cum‑sale agreement for two industrial plots allotted to the company, arguing that the company owned the land and that the Board required prior court permission under the Compa

M/S TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.versusLUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST & ANR.

2013 INSC 34010 May 2013Disposed off

The dispute arose between M/s Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (and Mapletree Properties) and the Ludhiana Improvement Trust over a joint‑venture agreement dated 24‑05‑2005, which the Trust later claimed was void. The developers filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199

ARUN KUMAR AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 90610 January 2014Disposed off

In Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court considered interlocutory applications filed in a writ petition under Article 32. The petitioner sought to have certain disparaging remarks about his bonafides, made in paragraph 63 of the judgment, expunged, arguing they were irrelevant to the decision.

ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIAversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.

2014 INSC 9729 May 2014Dismissed

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and a public‑spirited petitioner sought a writ directing the preservation of the Bade Baba Jain Temple at Kundalpur, Madhya Pradesh, alleging illegal construction by the Jain Temple Trust and claiming the site was a protected monument of national importance under the Ancient Mon

KISAN SHANKAR KATHOREversusARUN DATTATRAY SAWANT & ORS

2014 INSC 3849 May 2014Dismissed

Kisan Shankar Kathore was elected to the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, but a voter filed an election petition under RPA s.100(1)(d)(i) and (iv) alleging that Kathore’s nomination was improperly accepted because he failed to disclose government dues, his wife’s bungalow and vehicle, and his interest in a partnership

NIRMA INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.versusSECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

2013 INSC 3329 May 2013Dismissed

Nirma Industries Ltd. and its associate sought to withdraw a public open offer made under SEBI's Takeover Code after discovering alleged fraud and a sharp fall in the target company's share price. SEBI rejected the withdrawal request, and the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) upheld the rejection. The appellants argu

SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD.versusOIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.

2013 INSC 3359 May 2013Case Allowed

Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. entered into a contract with Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) for oilfield equipment and services. After alleged non‑payment of invoices, Schlumberger sent several notices to ONGC from 2008 onward, invoking arbitration under Clause 27 of the contract. ONGC failed to respond, and

SARVA U.P. GRAMIN BANK & ORS.versusMANOJ KUMAR CHAK

2013 INSC 2269 April 2013Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by several Regional Rural Banks challenging a High Court order that set aside two bank circulars which barred employees who had received a Grade ‘D’ performance rating or disciplinary punishment in the preceding five years from being considered for promotion. The Court examined the

RUSHI GUMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

2013 INSC 2289 April 2013Dismissed

The appellant, a Soil Conservation Officer, was initially suspended in 1998, the suspension was revoked in 1999, and he was later removed from service in 2003. The removal order was set aside by the High Court on grounds of procedural irregularities, and the department subsequently invoked Rule 12(4) of the Orissa Civi

MANOJ H. MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 2279 April 2013Dismissed

Manoj H. Mishra, a tradesman and union leader at Kakrapar Atomic Power Project, wrote a letter to a newspaper describing a flood‑induced accident and alleging corruption. He was charged with unauthorised communication to the press, criticism of project management and breach of confidentiality, and admitted all charges

HIRABHAI JHAVERBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & OHS.

2010 INSC 2039 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under Section 324 IPC for an offence committed on 23 July 1986 and sentenced to six months' imprisonment. The Gujarat High Court upheld the conviction and rejected the appellant's application to compound the offence. After the conviction, the victims filed an affidavit expressing their willi

A. SRIMANNARAYANAversusDASARI SANTAKUMARI & ANR.

2013 INSC 239 January 2013Dismissed

The wife of a deceased patient filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against two doctors who had performed an operation. The doctors contended that, per the Supreme Court’s decision in Martin F. D'Souza, a complaint could not be entertained without an expert opinion, and they sought to stay the proceed

DENEL (PROPRIETARY LIMITED)versusGOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

2012 INSC 119 January 2012Case Allowed

Denel (Proprietary) Ltd. entered into a contract with the Ministry of Defence for supply of Base Bleed Units. Disputes arose over rejected goods and the parties could not resolve them, leading to the appointment of a sole arbitrator, A.K. Jain, by the Director General of Ordnance Factory (DGOF) as per the contract clau

BHARATI TAMANGversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 6988 October 2013Directions issued

The widow of Madan Tamang, a political leader murdered in public, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking quashing of charge‑sheets and a fresh investigation by an independent Special Investigation Team, alleging that the State police, CID and CBI investigations were faulty. The Supreme Court examined the adequa

SHIV NANDAN MAHTOversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2013 INSC 4498 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Shiv Nandan Mahto was appointed as a clerk in a school in 1979, but an inspection report mistakenly recorded him as a librarian. When the school was taken over by the State of Bihar in 1983, his services were not transferred because the librarian post was not approved. Despite representations, he was not posted to any

MR. VIKRAM BAKSHI & ORS.versusMS. SONIA KHOSLA (DEAD) BY LRS.

2014 INSC 3818 May 2014Disposed off

Two business groups that had entered into a joint venture fell out over shareholding and director appointments, leading to a cascade of more than 80 proceedings, including company law petitions, contempt suits and criminal complaints under Section 340 Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court noted the deadlock and, rather than adjudi

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. & ORS.versusANANTA KISHORE ROUT & ORS.

2014 INSC 3748 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

National Aluminium Company Ltd. (NALCO) had established two schools for the children of its employees and entered into management agreements with external trusts. The school staff filed writ petitions claiming they were employees of NALCO and entitled to parity of pay with NALCO's own workers. The High Court held that

AL JAZEERA STEEL PRODUCTS COMPANY SAOGversusMID INDIA POWER & STEEL LTD.

2012 INSC 2178 May 2012Case Allowed

Al Jazeera Steel Products Company SAOG (the applicant) entered into a sale‑purchase contract with Mid India Power & Steel Ltd. (the respondent) for 2,000 metric tonnes of prime alloy steel billets. The billets delivered were found to be defective, leading the applicant to notify the respondent and request a joint inspe

BIPROMASZ BIPRON TRADING SAversusBHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED (BEL)

2012 INSC 2188 May 2012Disposed off

BIPROMASZ BIPRON Trading SA entered into a purchase order with Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL) for gyro units, but BEL halted supplies, rejected goods and alleged contractual breaches. The contract’s arbitration clause required disputes to be referred to BEL’s Chairman‑cum‑Managing Director (CMD) or his nominee. The petit

MAHADEO (D) THROUGH LRS & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2013 INSC 2218 April 2013Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh, through the Meerut Development Authority (MDA), acquired 246.931 acres of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a planned residential/commercial scheme. After the award and possession were taken, the MDA resolved in 1997 to withdraw acquisition of 204.912 acres, but the State Governm

B.T. KRISHNAMURTHYversusSRI BASAVESWARA EDUCATION SOCIETY & ORS.

2013 INSC 2198 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned T.D. Viswanath, who claimed to have worked as a Lecturer in a junior college from 1990 without ever receiving a formal appointment letter. In July 1995 the college orally informed him that his services were terminated, after which he sought reinstatement and regularisation of his employment. The Educ

M.S. SANDHU & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ETC.

2014 INSC 3717 May 2014Dismissed

The case concerned seniority disputes in the Punjab Police Service DSP cadre between promotees and direct recruits. The Supreme Court examined whether the earlier judgment in Paramjit Singh, which held that the quota rule must apply both at recruitment and at confirmation, should be followed or displaced by the later C

BIHAR STATE GOVT. SEC. SCL. TEACHERS ASSN.versusASHOK KUMAR SINHA & ORS.

2014 INSC 3727 May 2014Disposed off

The Bihar State Government Sec. SCL. Teachers Association, representing BSES teachers, sought enforcement of a Supreme Court‑mandated merger of the Bihar Subordinate Education Service (BSES) with the Bihar Education Service (BES). Although the Court had restored the 2006 merger resolution and quashed a 2007 notificatio

S. SIVAGURUversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2013 INSC 3217 May 2013Dismissed

The case concerned the integration of Leprosy Inspectors into the Tamil Nadu Health Department as Health Inspectors Grade I. The State issued G.O. No. 320 (1997) re-designating Leprosy Inspectors as Health Inspector Grade IB and later G.O. No. 382 (2007) attempted to grant them seniority and pay but placed them at the

POURNIMA SURYAKANT PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARAHTRA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 1407 March 2013

The petitioners, two cousins, claimed membership in the Thakar Scheduled Tribe and sought a caste certificate, which was rejected by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee. The Committee, after examining documentary evidence and a vigilance enquiry, found that the family’s historical records listed castes s

LINGARAM KODOPIversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2014 INSC 837 February 2014Disposed off

Lingaram Kodopi and Soni Sori, a nephew‑aunt duo, were arrested in Chhattisgarh on allegations of acting as conduits for financing Naxalite activities, charged under IPC sections 121, 124(1), 120B, the Chhattisgarh Jansuraksha Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Their bail applications were rejected by th

LAKSHMI ALIAS BHAGYALAKSHMI AND ANR.versusE. JAYARAM (D) BY LR.

2013 INSC 807 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs claimed ownership of a property purchased from the defendant, although the sale deed was unregistered, and filed a suit for permanent injunction together with an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC for interim relief. The trial court granted an interim injunction protecting the plaintiff

SUDISH PRASAD & ORS.versusBABUI JONHIA ALIAS MANORAMA DEVI & ORS.

2013 INSC 827 February 2013Dismissed

The plaintiff, Sudish Prasad, filed a title suit claiming the entire property left by her father Sukai Mahto. The property had been managed by Bal Kishun Mahto, appointed guardian of the minor Sukai, who allegedly executed deeds and claimed an oral gift of a portion of the land. The trial court awarded the plaintiff on

M/S. KALINGA MINING CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 837 February 2013Dismissed

M/s Kalinga Mining Corporation (appellant) challenged the grant of a mining lease to the legal heirs of the deceased Dr. Sarojini Pradhan (respondent No.10). The High Court had earlier allowed the substitution of the legal heirs, dismissed an SLP against that order, and later upheld the lease grant. The appellant argue

RANGI INTERNATIONAL LTD .versusNOVA SCOTIA BANK & ORS.

2013 INSC 3156 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Rangi International Ltd appealed against orders of the Competition Commission and the Competition Appellate Tribunal that dismissed its claim of unfair trade practice under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The Supreme Court observed that both the Commission and the Tribunal perform important qu

SMT. SARITA DOKANIA AND ANR.ETC.versusSMT. KRISHNA DEY AND ANR.

2013 INSC 3106 May 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellants had entered into two agreements in July 1999 and deposited earnest money with the respondents, who later offered to return the money. The appellants rejected the offer and sued for specific performance; the trial court granted it, but the Patna High Court denied specific performance and ordered a refund

T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 9016 January 2014Disposed off

The petitioners sought compliance with the Supreme Court's order in Lafarge Umiam Mining Private Limited v. Union of India, which directed the Central Government to appoint a National Regulator under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 for independent appraisal and monitoring of environmental clearan

JOHN K. ABRAHAMversusSIMON C. ABRAHAM & ANOTHER

2013 INSC 8035 December 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent alleged that the appellant borrowed Rs.1,50,000 and issued a cheque which later bounced, invoking Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court acquitted the appellant, finding the complainant's evidence riddled with contradictions and gaps, particularly regarding the loan amount, date,

SISTER MINA LALITA BARUWAversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 8045 December 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Sister Mina Lalita Baruwa, a Catholic nun, alleged assault, molestation and gang rape during communal violence in Kandhamal. During the trial, PW‑18, a Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate who conducted the test identification parade, gave a statement that conflicted with the official parade record (Exhibit‑8). The victi

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusB.V. GOPINATH

2013 INSC 5895 September 2013Dismissed

The Union of India challenged the quashing of charge sheets issued to senior income‑tax officers under Rule 14(3) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965, arguing that the Finance Minister's approval for initiating disciplinary proceedings under Rule 14(2) also sufficed for the char

NANDINI SUNDAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF CHATTISGARH

2011 INSC 4515 July 2011Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition filed by civil‑society activists alleging that the State of Chhattisgarh, with the Union's financial support, was employing thousands of barely literate tribal youths as Special Police Officers (SPOs) and arming them to combat Maoist/Naxalite insurgents, thereb

ASHOK SHANKARRAO CHAVANversusDR. MADHAVRAO KINHALKAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 9705 May 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered three appeals challenging orders of the Election Commission that disqualified elected candidates under Section 1OA of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 for allegedly failing to lodge true and correct accounts of election expenses. The Court examined the statutory scheme, the Conduc

MUNAGALA YADAMMAversusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS.

2012 INSC 65 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a detention order issued under the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986 against Munagala Anjaiah, who was alleged to be a bootlegger violating the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995. The appellant's wife challenged the order, and the High Court upheld it, reasoning th

RAM JETHMALANI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDLA AND ORS.

2011 INSC 4344 July 2011Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition filed by former Union Law Minister Ram Jethmalani and others alleging that large sums of unaccounted money were being held by Indian individuals and entities in foreign banks, notably involving Hassan Ali Khan and the Tapurias, and that the Union of India had been sluggish

KESHARBAI @ PUSHPABAI EKNATHRAO NALAWADEversusTARABAI PRABHAKARRAO NALAWADE & ORS.

2014 INSC 9574 April 2014Modified

In Civil Appeal No. 3867 of 2014, the Supreme Court observed that a clerical error had omitted the phrase confirming the trial court's findings on Issue III in paragraph 22 of its earlier judgment dated 14 March 2014. The Court directed that the omitted line be restored, thereby amending the judgment to read that the t

T.N. GENERATION & DISTBN. CORPN. LTD.versusPPN POWER GEN. CO. PVT. LTD.

2014 INSC 2484 April 2014Dismissed

The appellant, a power distribution company, entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with the respondent, a power generator, and disputed accounting details and rebate claims arising from monthly invoices. The dispute was taken before the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (State Commission) which adjud

YUMMAN ONGBI LEMBI LEIMAversusSTATE OF MANIPUR & ORS.

2012 INSC 24 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's husband, Yumman Somendro, was arrested in January 2011 for murder and, while in police custody, was served with a detention order under the National Security Act (NSA) dated 31 January 2011, which was later confirmed by the Governor for twelve months. The order was based solely on the subjective satisfa

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTARANCHALversusJAGDISH CHANDRA SINGH BORA & ANR. ETC.

2014 INSC 1603 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the recruitment of Junior Engineers in Uttaranchal, where the 2001 emergency recruitment rules did not grant any preference to trained apprentices, but the 2003 amendment rules introduced a 10‑mark bonus for apprentices. The Court held that the 2003 rules could not be given retrospective effe

UNION OF INDIAversusM/S. CONCRETE PRODUCTS & CONST. CO. ETC.

2014 INSC 1623 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India (Railway administration) entered into contracts with M/s Concrete Products & Construction Co. for supplying concrete sleepers. Overpayments were identified and the railway sought recovery, leading to arbitration where the arbitrator ordered the railway to refund the amounts with interest at 18% per a

THOTA VENKATESWARLUversusSTATE OF A.P. TR. PRINCL. SEC. & ANR.

2011 INSC 6342 September 2011Disposed off

The petitioner, Thota Venkateswarlu, married Parvathareddy Suneetha in India and later moved with her to Botswana, where she alleged cruelty and dowry demands. A complaint was lodged in India invoking IPC sections 498‑A and 506 (alleged to have occurred abroad) and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 (alleged to hav

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDUR, MADHAMESHWAR CANALversusVILAS EKNATH JADHAV AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 2022 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the Executive Engineer, had taken possession of land belonging to the respondents on 3 June 2001, but the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued only on 30 December 2006. The respondents claimed compensation, rent, and interest for the period before the n

SABERABIBI YAKUBBHAI SHAIKH & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2014 INSC 22 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The wife and relatives of a truck driver who died in a road accident filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for compensation and 12% interest from the date of the accident. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner awarded the compensation with interest from the accident date, but the Gujarat High Court

ARUN KUMAR AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 7441 November 2013Dismissed

The petitioner challenged the appointment of U.K. Sinha as Chairman of SEBI on grounds that he failed to satisfy the statutory requirement of "high integrity" under Section 4(5) of the SEBI Act, alleging mis‑representation, irregular deputation, false declarations, and a conspiracy to secure his selection. The Court ex

S. IYYAPANversusM/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 3961 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The claimants, the dependants of a deceased motorcyclist, were awarded compensation by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal after a fatal accident involving a Maxi Cab. The insurer, United India Insurance Co., appealed, arguing that the driver, who held a licence for light motor vehicles but not an endorsement for comme

SACHIN GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusK.S. FORGE METAL PRIVATE LIMITED

2013 INSC 1321 March 2013

The appellants challenged an arbitral award that had been set aside by the Delhi High Court. The High Court held the award invalid for lack of notice and hearing to the respondent, invoking Section 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and also made extensive remarks on the parties' conduct. The

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search