Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Arms Act

4780 judgments · newest first · showing 1201–1400

Ram Prasad Badhhai @ Ram Prasad BadaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Prasad Badhhai was arrested in connection with alleged illegal arms manufacturing and charged under Sections 25(1‑A), 25(1‑AA), 25(1‑B), 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent, custody since 22‑Oct‑2025, and that he is not named in the FIR; …

Kameshwar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Kameshwar Rai, was charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a violent incident on 29 January 2021 in which two persons were killed. The FIR alleges that the petitioner, along with others, apprehended the informant's son who was …

Ramanand ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ramanand Thakur, applied for regular bail in a case (Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 179 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR names Mohit Singh as the shooter, but the prosecution …

Sonu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sonu Sahani and Harendra Sahani were arrested in connection with a land‑dispute incident in which firearms were used, resulting in injuries to three persons. The FIR charges them under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, although the petitioners contend …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the husband of the informant, resulting in his death. The informant, a wife, claimed that the …

Harsh Raj @ Chhotu @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Harsh Raj, was charged under sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly killing the informant's brother. He applied for bail, but the informant alleged that the petitioner had concealed his prior criminal history. The …

Sethi Singh @ Kunal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sethi Singh (Kunal Kumar), sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 351(3), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused fired upon the son of an …

Hasmuddin Ansari @ Hasmaddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Hasmuddin Ansari and Mukhtar Ansari filed an anticipatory bail application. The counsel for petitioner no.2 sought to withdraw the application because he had already been arrested, and the court permitted the withdrawal. The court then considered the anticipatory bail for petitioner …

Rakesh Paswan @ MalingaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Rakesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS No. 225 of 2020) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 399, 402, 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26, 35. The prosecution’s case is based on secret information leading to the seizure of three co‑accused with live …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he abducted the informant's son on 20 July 2023, after which the boy was found dead with firearm injuries. …

ABHISHEK KUMAR @ ABHISHEK GUPTA @ RAJAN @ RANJANversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The High Court considered applications for regular bail filed by Ramesh Kumar Jha and Abhishek Kumar, who were charged under Section 310(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with a bank locker robbery. The prosecution’s case relied on confessional …

Ramesh Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The High Court of Patna considered regular bail applications filed by Ramesh Kumar Jha and Abhishek Kumar in a case registered as Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025, involving offences under Section 310(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners …

Manoj SorenversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Soren applied for regular bail in a case involving numerous serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act and the U.P. Act, alleged to be a Naxalite who assaulted police. The prosecution relied on police suspicion and alleged criminal antecedents, while the petitioner …

Sonu Kumar Singh @ Sonu Kumar @ Sonu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sonu Kumar Singh applied for bail in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act, alleging that a loaded pistol, cartridge and ornaments were seized from him. The prosecution contended that the seized items linked him to the offences, while …

Pawan Kumar Mandal @ Pawan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Pawan Kumar Mandal was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26(1) of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a pistol and eight live cartridges. He contended that the seizure was illegal because the police did not comply with Section 105 of the BNSS and that he was …

Kailu Yadav @ Kaila @ Shailesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Kailu Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at an informant, causing a superficial gunshot wound to the thigh. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the injury was minor, the …

Domi Yadav @ Doman YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Domi Yadav was arrested in connection with a case of alleged indiscriminate firing that injured an informant's knee. He was charged under sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated due to an ongoing …

Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chandan Yadav, sought bail for offences under Sections 25, 7, 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66(c) of the Information Technology Act, alleging that he was identified solely through a viral video showing illegal firearms and that no weapon was recovered from him. The prosecution …

Anik MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of eleven men from Govindpur village, sought bail after being implicated in Maheshkhunt Police Station Case No. 17 of 2026 for offences under several sections of the B.N.S.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that they, along with others, attacked an …

Bhagwan DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Bhagwan Das was charged under IPC sections 120 and 34 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 for alleged involvement in a murder plot. The prosecution’s case relied on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Kundan Kumar, who claimed Bhagwan Das supplied cartridges and a pistol, …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Nitish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 326, 379, 307 and 34, and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he entered an informant's house and fired a gun, striking the informant's thigh. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, highlighted …

Muntun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Muntun Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 111 of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol and live cartridges were recovered from his house. The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that the seizure was …

Amit Kumar Giri @ Amit GiriversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amit Kumar Giri applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged that a live cartridge was recovered from his possession. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that nothing was seized from him, and that the …

Raj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raj Kumar Singh and his two sons, were arrested in connection with a disturbance in Nasariganj market where a group of accused, including Binay Singh, were armed with lathis and other weapons. They were charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103, 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable …

Chhotu @ Naiyar @ Md. Naiyer Alam @ Md. Neyar AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner was charged under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of a teacher’s sister. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants, possibly a co‑teacher, carried out the killing, and that the petitioner was part of …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at police, and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment. They challenged the conviction on grounds that the prosecution’s evidence was inconsistent, the witnesses …

Kranti Sharma and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kranti Sharma and Ravi Sharma were arrested on 30 November 2012 after a police raid that recovered detonators, cartridges, and firearms, leading to their conviction under Sections 25(1-AA), 26(i), 26(ii) and 35 of the Arms Act and a ten‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence. The appellants challenged …

RAFI AHMED @ NANHAKversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at police, and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment. They challenged the conviction on grounds that the prosecution’s evidence was inconsistent, the witnesses …

Keshav JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Keshav Jha, was arrested in connection with a shooting incident that resulted in injuries to the informant's brother. The prosecution alleged that Jha, along with an associate, shot the victim after a dispute involving family relations and alleged drunkenness. Jha sought bail, …

Md. Aslam Ali @ Md. AslamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Aslam Ali, was implicated in a murder case (Case No. 516 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged the deceased was killed by unknown persons, and two similarly situated accused had …

SHEIKH JAHANGIR @ SK. JEHANGIR and ORSversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at police, and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment. They challenged the conviction on grounds that the prosecution’s evidence was inconsistent, the witnesses …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Manish Kumar applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 309(4) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that ATM cards were looted by unknown persons. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was identified by the informant in the …

Ram Pravesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ram Pravesh Yadav, Karelal Yadav and Rakesh Kumar Sinha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Case No.86 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged their involvement …

Suraj Chauhan @ Suraj Kumar ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Suraj Chauhan, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (POA) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant's son with an iron rod, firing a weapon, and using caste-based slurs. The appellant contended that the FIR does not specifically …

Surendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Surendra Thakur, was charged under Sections 25(1‑b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for possession of three country‑made pistols and a motorcycle, and has been in custody since 28‑08‑2024 with three prior criminal records. His earlier bail application was rejected, but he filed a second …

Gautam Yadav @ Gautam Kumar @ Kumar GautamversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, was charged with murder, abetment of suicide, criminal conspiracy and possession of arms under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since July 2024 and this was his fourth bail application, all of which had been …

Md. Arastuansari Ansari @ Arastu Ansari @ ArastuversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Md. Arastuansari Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 111(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly supplying a carbine and cartridges. The co‑accused’s self‑inculpatory …

Arun Kumar Singh @ Amit Kumar @ Arun SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Arun Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the IPC, several provisions of the Arms Act and the NDNDPS Act for possession of 1.5 kg of charas, a loaded pistol and related ammunition. He has 22 prior criminal convictions and has been in custody since 22‑11‑2023. The petitioner filed …

Rambha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rambha Kumari was charged with murder under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered at Jehanabad Police Station. The prosecution alleged she was involved in the killing of her father‑in‑law, based mainly on statements of co‑accused Prince Kumar …

Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the alleged killing of a deceased person. An earlier bail application was rejected without examining the case diary. Upon review, the diary indicated that …

Sonu Jha @ Subham Kumar Jha @ Shubham Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Jha, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved a shooting at a tea shop, but the informant …

Sarwan Yadav @ Sharwan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Sarwan Yadav and Manish Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved indiscriminate firing at a tea shop, but no injuries were reported and the …

Mun Munga Saha @ Mun Munga Lal Saha @ Munga Lal SahaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mun Munga Saha applied for regular bail for an offence under Sections 309(4), 309(6), 109(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a robbery of silver and gold in which a pistol was fired, injuring a villager. The petitioner's earlier bail application had been rejected on …

Md. MustakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Md. Mustak was arrested in connection with a case of assault arising from a land dispute, charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 3 March 2025 and sought bail, arguing that the allegations were general, the injuries …

Surendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Thakur was arrested in connection with the recovery of four country‑made pistols and charged under Sections 25(1‑b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 5 December 2024 and had three prior criminal antecedents. The petitioner claimed false implication and argued that only …

Rajendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Rajendra Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC, later added 120(B) IPC and Section 27 Arms Act) after his name appeared in the self‑inculpatory statement of co‑accused Lalan Yadav. The petitioner asserted his innocence, clean antecedents, and …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and illegal possession of a firearm under IPC Section 392 and Arms Act Section 27. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and only mentioned in a co-accused's confessional statement, which he argued …

PRASHANT MISHRA @ MANGALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prashant Mishra @ Mangal, who was arrested under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that there was a delay between the alleged incident and the FIR, and …

FAIZ @ SHAHFAIZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Faiz @ Shahfaiz, appealed against the order denying bail in a murder case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. The FIR alleged that the deceased was assaulted and killed by a group of accused, including the appellant. The defence …

SAIF ALI @ ASLAM @ SHAUKIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Saif Ali, who is charged with offences under Sections 394, 506, 411, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/25(1B) of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he …

VIJAY KUMAR GAUTAM @ KALLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijay Kumar Gautam, who was charged under Sections 3, 5-A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Section 109(1) of the same Sanhita, and Sections 3 …

YOGESH @ MUKULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Yogesh @ Mukul, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences including Sections 309(6), 311, 312, 317(2), 3(5), 109(1) of the BNSS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the only evidence against him was his own …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sameer, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with a sharp‑edged weapon. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no …

ROHIT @ KEERAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rohit @ Keera, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 173 of 2025 for alleged violations of Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 35 and 27 of the Arms …

RITIK TYAGI @ GOLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a charge under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 5, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. The applicant, Ritik Tyagi, claimed innocence, stating that no police …

NAMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Namit, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed false implication and highlighted that no arms were …

KARANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Karan filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case involving offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that Karan and two co‑accused assaulted the son …

WAQEELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Waqeel, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 10.3 kg of ganja. The applicant’s name appeared in the confessional …

GAUTAM GIHARversusSTATE OF U..P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Gautam Gihar, who was charged under Sections 310(4) and 317(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for alleged preparation of dacoity. The …

AMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought bail in a criminal trial (Case No. 295 of 2024) for alleged offences under Sections 109, 103(1), 333 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. He claimed to be mentally unstable, alleging that a mental illness caused him to attack Aman and subsequently his wife, who …

MOHD TALIBversusSTATE OF U.P THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(HOME) U.P., LUCKNOW

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd Talib, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing pistols and live cartridges. The applicant …

RAVI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravi Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30‑11‑2025 that named others but not him, alleging lack of maintainability. The petitioners argued that because they were not named in the FIR, they could not invoke the writ and cited several precedents to …

MADHAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, in a case under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shahruku, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged discharge of a country‑made pistol and injury to a police officer. The applicant claimed innocence …

SHIVA TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shiva Tyagi was charged with murdering his aunt under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that there were no reliable eyewitnesses and that his alleged confession to police was not properly recorded, seeking bail after being in custody since …

NAUSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Naushad, who is charged under Sections 307 and 411 of the IPC and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at police, although no police officer was injured and the applicant himself was hurt. Naushad, who has 19 prior …

IRSHAD ALIAS MULLIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Irshad alias Mulli, who was charged in Crime No. 130 of 2025 with offences including assault with a sharp‑edged weapon, among others. The applicant argued that although …

ANKITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Ankit who faces charges under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 316(2) of the same Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

Radhe Krishna RamanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Radhe Krishna Raman, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Ghosi P.S. Case No.424 of 2024) where he was alleged to have assaulted a family with a pistol, stolen jewellery and cash, and violated several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The …

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, applied for regular bail in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substance Act and UPA Act. Earlier, a group of co‑accused had obtained regular bail, which was later rejected, and they were directed to renew their bail plea after …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Santosh Yadav and Gopal Yadav were charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B), Arms Act section 27 and UAPA sections 16, 18 and 20 for alleged involvement in a Maoist attack that resulted in death. They had earlier applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected on 12‑02‑2024, and …

Bittu Prakash @ Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bittu Prakash, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged looting of a businessman and was charged under IPC sections 399, 402, 413, 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35. He has five prior cases and has been in custody since 12‑11‑2025. The prosecution’s case …

DHIRAJ KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b) a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act after a viral video allegedly showed him firing a weapon. The prosecution relied on the video, the petitioner’s confession, and the recovery of a pistol and cartridges …

Pinku PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pinku Paswan applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging he was falsely implicated in the murder of an informant's nephew. The prosecution alleged that Paswan and six co‑accused killed the nephew and concealed …

Prem Kumar @ Pappu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Prem Kumar, the owner of a rented house in Surajgarha, Lakhisarai, was arrested after police recovered articles intended for illegal arms manufacturing from the premises. The tenant, Bittu Kumar, alleged that the manufacturing was carried out with the petitioner’s knowledge. The petitioner contended …

Bablu Mandal @ Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Bablu Mandal, who was implicated in a murder case (Mufassil P.S. Case No. 258 of 2024) under Sections 103, 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of …

Vikash Sah @ Vikash SawversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Sah was arrested on 2 November 2025 in connection with a shooting incident alleged to have occurred on 30 October 2025, for which he was charged under Sections 109, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, …

Raju Yadav @ Raj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raju Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent incident involving assault, stabbing and firing, alleged under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He sought bail, contending that he is not named in the FIR and was implicated only …

XXXversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, a 16‑year‑old juvenile, was charged under IPC 302 read with 34 and the Arms Act for the murder of an informant’s son. The Juvenile Justice Board found him mentally competent and ordered trial as an adult in a Children Court, which denied bail citing the prosecution’s inquest and …

Yotendra Kumar Singh @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Yotendra Kumar Singh, was implicated in an FIR alleging assault and firing upon an informant, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that no one suffered firearm injury and that there was no specific overt act …

Anil Yadav @ Chunna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anil Yadav was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 245 of 2026) alleging that he fired at an informant's door and was charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Arms Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, that …

Kamlesh Verma @ Kamal Verma @ Kamlesh Prasad VermaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Kamlesh Verma and Anupam Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Goh PS Case No. 189 of 2025) where they were accused under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a fight broke out between two village groups, involving …

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a shooting incident during a marriage ceremony where several youths brandished firearms and one bullet injured a bystander. He was charged under sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Non-Compulsory (BNS) Act and sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35 …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Akhilesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a country‑made pistol was recovered from a bush, not from his possession. He claimed innocence, argued that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. during the …

Ashwani Dubey @ Ashwini Dubey @ Golu DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashwani Dubey, was arrested in connection with a 2018 incident involving robbery, attempted murder and illegal possession of a firearm, alleged under IPC sections 387, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27. He was not named in the FIR; his name emerged only from a confessional statement of …

Guddu Corex @ Jafar ImamversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Guddu Corex, also known as Jafar Imam, has been in custody since July 8, 2025 in connection with a murder case (Section 302 IPC) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a FIR dated May 12, 2022. The petitioner alleged that the FIR was fabricated, he has a clean antecedent, and …

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Excise Act read with Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after an informant reported that four persons fled from police, one of whom was seized drunk and a pistol was recovered. The petitioner argues he had no …

Dingal Yadav @ Diggal Yadav @ Shashi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dingal Yadav, was arrested on 19 July 2025 in connection with a case alleging that he and co‑accused fired two rounds at a Scorpio car, injuring the informant’s son, under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that the FIR was …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Yadav (appellant 1) and Gorak Yadav (appellant 2) were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a violent incident in Dhobaha where several persons were assaulted and …

NATHILAL RATHORE @ BHOLE GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nathilal Rathore, sought bail in a case under Sections 307 and 504 IPC, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the injury to the victim was minor, occurring on a non‑vital part of the body. He alleged a prior grievance where the victim had killed his son, leading to earlier …

ANKIT @ SHASHIKANT TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ankit @ Shashikant Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was alleged to have opened fire on an informant, though no injury was reported. The applicant argued that the allegation was false, the investigation was pending, and his …

SATENDRA @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Satendra @ Pappu was arrested for alleged possession of 21.10 kg of ganja, a country‑made pistol and cartridges, and charged under Sections 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.), Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act and Sections 8, 20 of the NDPS Act. He filed a bail application …

RANJEET CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Ranjeet Chaurasiya, who was alleged to be involved in liquor smuggling and charged under Sections 317(2), 341(2) of the BNSS and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior criminal …

PRINCE DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Prince Dubey in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15034 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 108 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was missing, …

SHEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Shekhar, who is accused under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that no police officer was injured …

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek, accused of murder under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act, in connection with the death of a young man who was allegedly in a love affair with Abhishek's sister. The prosecution alleged that Abhishek and co‑accused threatened …

JITENDRA @ LUKKA @ LUKKA DONversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jitendra @ Lukka @ Lukka Don, was incarcerated since 25‑12‑2024 on five separate criminal matters pending before the Bareilly courts. He sought bail under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. but could not furnish the two sureties required in each case due to poverty. The applicant relied on a …

RITIK KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ritik Kumar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order dated 23 March 2026 passed by the District Magistrate of Mau in Criminal Case No. 2303 of 2025. The impugned order related to offences under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Animal …

SARITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sarita Devi, the registered owner of a vehicle seized in a cow‑slaughter case, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the District Magistrate’s order confiscating the vehicle and the subsequent criminal revision order. The petitioner claimed the vehicle was falsely implicated and …

FARMAN ALIAS BHOOTversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman alias Bhoot, who is charged under Section 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on a police party, though no police officer was injured. The applicant has a substantial criminal history, with 21 …

SADDAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Saddam, filed a criminal revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 29 January 2026 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad, which dismissed his application for discharge in a trial under multiple statutes. The trial involved …

Mahtab Alam @ Lal BabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mahtab Alam, was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and use of arms under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the father of an informant. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, argued lack of eyewitness …

Shamshad Ahmad @ Shamshad AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Shamshad Ahmad, filed a second anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that on 10 August 2024 the petitioner, armed with a licensed pistol, …

Md. Minhaj Alam @ Md. Pintu AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The appellant, Md. Minhaj Alam, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged involvement in a killing. He sought regular bail, arguing that a …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested on 13 November 2025 in connection with a FIR dated 12 March 2025 alleging offences under Sections 109(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused fired …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Nitish Kumar applied for bail in a case (Mohanpur PS Case No.31 of 2024) involving alleged murder under Sections 109, 3(5) and 103(1) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Manoj Yadav and Sanjay Yadav murdered the informant’s husband …

Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Gopal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging that he, along with others, assaulted and fired a pistol at the informant’s son, causing a grievous knee injury. The FIR specifically charges him under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The …

Nandu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Nandu Paswan was arrested in connection with a case under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and has been in judicial custody since 19 September 2024. He filed a second bail application after an earlier denial, arguing that …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 100 grams of cannabis, a country‑made pistol and a live cartridge, alleged under sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act and sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He filed a petition for regular bail, contending that …

Ramkaran kumar @ Ramkaran RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Ramkaran Kumar and Sanjeev Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a rifle, two pistols and ten live cartridges were recovered from a hut belonging to Bharosi Rai. The petitioners contended that the seized …

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Santosh Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving murder, wrongful restraint, criminal conspiracy, common intention and illegal possession of arms, and has been in judicial custody since September 2023. The petitioner sought bail and requested that his trial be separated from that of …

Ramashray Das @ Ramashraya DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Ramashray Das and Laxman Das, were arrested in June 2023 in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged members of an extremist gang. They filed three successive applications for regular bail, the first …

Sintu Kumar @ Saltu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 506/34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a serious offence involving alleged firing. He applied for bail, having been in judicial custody since March 2024, after two earlier bail applications were rejected …

Nandan Kumar Singh @ Nandan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nandan Kumar Singh was charged under several IPC sections (341, 323, 354, 307, 504, 506/34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged firing. The petitioner had been denied bail twice earlier and had been in custody since 20‑04‑2024. On his third bail application, counsel argued that none of the …

Lalu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Sultanganj P.S. Case No.254 of 2024, which alleged his involvement in a murder and related offences under Sections 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. The trial court had earlier …

SANJEEV KUMAR MANDAL @ SANJEEV KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sanjeev Kumar Mandal and Rajesh Kumar Mandal, were charged with a slew of offences under the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have assaulted the father of an informant with firearms causing six injuries. The petitioners contended that they were falsely …

Kartik KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kartik Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (Muzaffarpur Paroo PS Case No. 469 of 2025) alleged under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on a confessional statement of co‑accused Santosh Kumar, …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Kumar was arrested on 19 November 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged armed robbery and offences under Sections 309(4) & 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that unknown persons, at gunpoint, threatened an informant, fired at him and stole his …

Sanchu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sanchu Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNSS) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with eight others, was armed and fired at …

Pawan RajbharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Pawan Rajbhar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he fired upon the brother of an informant, resulting in death. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent, …

Prince Kumar @ Prince ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prince Kumar was arrested in connection with a 2024 FIR alleging offences under Sections 109, 352, 351(2), 61(2) & 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the confessional statement of co‑accused Jitendra Kumar Yadav, with no direct evidence linking the …

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Subodh Kumar, accused of murder under Sections 103(1), 303(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail. The prosecution alleges he participated in the killing of a deceased over an 18‑kattha land dispute, while the petitioner contends there is no direct …

Munna Kumar Chaudhary @ Munna SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Kumar Chaudhary applied for regular bail in a murder case (Section 302/34 IPC) and illegal possession of arms (Section 27 Arms Act) arising from a 2020 FIR in Majhauliya, West Champaran. The FIR did not originally name him; his name emerged from a co‑accused’s confessional statement, and he …

Bipin Yadav @ Buchcha YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Bipin Yadav applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an incident where co‑accused fired at an informant's father, resulting in his death. The petitioner contended that he had no …

Satish Kumar @ Chhabila YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Satish Kumar, was charged in a 2022 case for murder under Section 302 IPC, criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, and illegal possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired on an informant’s father resulting in death. He applied for bail before the …

Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Yadav, sought regular bail in a case involving charges of murder, attempt to murder, rioting, and possession of arms under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Yadav, along with others, fired upon an order given by …

Anwar Sah @ Anwar ShahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anwar Sah was arrested in connection with the recovery of firearms from his residence and charged under Section 317(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act, with charges framed on 07‑03‑2023. He also faces a separate charge under Section 109 of the B.N.S., for which he is …

Kabil MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Kabil Mukhiya was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on the son of an informant, resulting in death. He applied for regular bail, asserting innocence, a clean antecedent, and noting that he had been in custody since …

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Bind @ Ranjit BinversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a double murder case arising from a rivalry over sand ghats, alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Although his name does not appear in the FIR, it was mentioned in a self‑inculpatory …

Lalpari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Lalpari Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (S. Kamal P.S. Case No. 232 of 2025) involving offences under various sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, participated in an armed assault …

Devan Yadav @ Degan Yadav @ Ramji Yadav @ RamjiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Devan Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 364(A) (kidnapping for ransom) and 34 (common intention), Arms Act section 27, and UAPA sections 16 and 18 for allegedly kidnapping two persons with a group of 30‑40 Naxalites for extortion. The trial was delayed because co‑accused and the …

Ajay Kumar Poddar @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Poddar and Bablu Poddar, were named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant using the butt of a country-made pistol, resulting in head and nose injuries, and for snatching cash and a gold chain. They contended that the incident stemmed from a prior enmity and that …

Amit Kumar @ RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar was arrested for possession of 225 litres of illicit liquor, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 23 January 2026 and has five prior criminal convictions. The petitioner …

Nikhil Yadav @ Nikhil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Nikhil Yadav, was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 118(1), 109 of the Bihar Negotiable Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly killing the deceased with a firearm. He has been in custody since 17‑08‑2024 and has two prior criminal antecedents. The petitioner …

Laltu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Laltu Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS 115 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 302, 201, 120(B), 34 of the IPC and Section 27(3) of the Arms Act. He claimed that his name was added to the FIR a year later based on the confessional statements of …

Ashok YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ashok Yadav was arrested in connection with the alleged murder of Madan Yadav, where he was said to have been armed with a pistol and part of a group assaulting the victim. The petitioner sought regular bail for offences under sections 126(2), 115, 103(1), 61, 354, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS and …

Mithun Yadav @ Prince Kumar @ Prince @ Prince KrversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithun Yadav, accused of offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act, sought regular bail for two pending session trials. He had been in custody since 10 March 2025, with 19 prior criminal cases, and only …

Mangal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Mangal Sah, was arrested while planning a loot and was found in possession of a pistol, with additional gold ornaments recovered from co‑accused. He faces charges under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the …

Rajeev Kumar Rai @ Rajeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rajeev Kumar Rai and Sanjeev Kumar Singh, were arrested in connection with a case where the informant's son allegedly died after being assaulted with sticks, an iron rod, a pistol and axes. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 and …

Bhushan Shama @ Bipin Singh @ BipinversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bhushan Shama, was implicated in a Naxalite attack on a construction site, charged with multiple IPC offences, a provision of the Arms Act and the CLA Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was vague and that a co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed …

Pankaj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pankaj Singh, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 2,593.08 liters of illicit liquor and alleged violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 21 January 2026 and claimed innocence, offering to donate Rs. 25,000 to a …

Amit Kumar Yadav @ Amit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 267 of 2024) where a pistol was also recovered. He is charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, and has been in custody since March 12, 2025 with four prior …

Raj Nath SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Raj Nath Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 2,593.08 litres of illicit liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and several provisions of the Arms Act. He is also implicated in three other serious offences. The Patna High Court, after …

Sanjeev Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Rajeev Kumar Rai and Sanjeev Kumar Singh were arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with weapons that resulted in the death of the informant's son. They sought bail, contending that the FIR contained only generic allegations and did not specifically attribute any …

Gagan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gagan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the B.N.S. read with Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a police raid recovered a country‑made pistol. The only link to the petitioner was a statement by co‑accused Bambam Kumar, who identified …

Md. Amir KhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Amir Khan, was arrested in connection with a shooting incident alleged under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, with a loaded country‑made pistol recovered from his possession. The victim, Ritesh Kumar, stated that the co‑accused, Md. Sahil Alam, fired at him, and the …

Ram Jeevan Singh @ Sudershan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Jeevan Singh, accused of offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, the Arms Act (Sec. 27) and the Criminal Law Amendment Act (Sec. 17), has been in judicial custody since 4 February 2021. This is his third application for regular bail after two earlier refusals by the Patna High …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Kaushal Kumar, Bugan Paswan and Umesh Paswan were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant with the butt of a pistol and allegedly firing in the air, offences alleged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, …

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pramod Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No.635 of 2025) involving offences under sections 308(2), 308(3), 109 and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to …

Amrit Raj @ Bittu Kumar @ Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amrit Raj, was arrested on 16 February 2026 in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27. The FIR specifically attributes the act of firing that injured an informant to co‑accused Amit Kumar Choudhary, while the petitioner is …

Baijnath Rawat @ Baijhnath RautversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Baijnath Rawat, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case originating in 2003. He had been in custody since April 4, 2025, and his earlier bail application was rejected with a direction to reapply after six months. Counsel …

Dablu Yadav @ Sundar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dablu Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC sections 302, 120(B), 34) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 6 August 2024, and eight of the fourteen charge‑sheet witnesses had been examined. The petitioner’s earlier regular bail application …

SHALU KUMAR @ SHOLU KUMAR @ SALUversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shalu Kumar, was in custody for a murder case (Case No. 132 of 2021) involving offences under IPC sections 302, 34, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27, based on an FIR lodged by informant Prabha Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and four others shot the informant's son, …

Chanda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chanda Devi and Shinodh Ray sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging they assaulted Vakeel Sharma, who later died. The FIR alleged that the petitioners used a sword and other weapons, but the post‑mortem report recorded death as asphyxia due to heart disease with no external injuries. The …

Shinodh RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chanda Devi and Shinodh Ray sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging they assaulted Vakeel Sharma, who later died. The FIR alleged that the petitioners used a sword and other weapons, but the post‑mortem report recorded death as asphyxia due to heart disease with no external injuries. The …

Prashant Poddar @ Prashant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Prashant Poddar, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged from a confessional statement of co-accused Bhaskar Jha, who had earlier been granted …

Jamuna Chouhan @ Yamuna ChouhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jamuna Chouhan was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged participation in a violent attack on a village in September 2024 that involved arson, looting and assault. The Special Judge had rejected her …

Shubham Chaudhary @ Shubham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shubham Chaudhary was arrested in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name was absent from the FIR and that the informant and another witness identified other accused as the shooters. The …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Kumar appealed against the order of a Special Judge that denied him anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, firing of weapons, and offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that a group of accused, …

Prem Sahni @ Gopal ChaudhryversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Prem Sahni, also known as Gopal Chaudhry, applied for bail while in custody since 12 February 2025 in connection with a 2004 murder case (Sections 302, 307, 34 IPC) and several offences under the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that he, along with co‑accused, fired on an informant’s brother, causing his …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Vikash Kumar (alias Vikash Yadav) was arrested on 14 July 2025 in connection with a 2023 FIR alleging multiple offences including rioting, assault, grievous hurt, attempted murder and illegal possession of arms. The informant claimed that Kumar and others attacked his father, severed both forearms …

Rohit Kumar Nirala @ KalluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Nirala, was charged under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing four bullets at an informant, one of which struck the informant's leg. The medical injury report, however, indicated that the wound was …

Brajmohan Kumar @ BirijmohanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Brajmohan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged involvement in supplying ammunition to accused persons in a loot-planning case. The FIR alleged violations of Sections 110, 111(3), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 …

Guddu Rai @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Guddu Rai, sought regular bail in a case involving illegal sand mining and a double murder, charged under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was alleged to have fired the weapon that killed two persons and has been in custody since September …

Vikas Kumar @ Vikas YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 364, 302/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting and causing the death of the deceased. He had been in custody since 24 December 2025 and applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, false implication, and that the …

Lalan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, a group of relatives, applied for bail in a case registered under PS Chausha (Falaut) Case No. 91 of 2023, alleging offences including murder, attempt to murder, assault, and illegal possession of arms. They have been in custody since August 12, 2025. Their counsel argued that only …

Suraj Patel @ Suraj Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Suraj Patel, sought regular bail for offences under IPC sections 385 (dacoity), 307 (attempt to murder), 387 (attempt to commit culpable homicide), 34 (common intention) and Arms Act section 27, arising from an alleged extortion and shooting incident. The prosecution alleged that a …

Ishwar Chand Yadav @ Ishwar Chandra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Ishwar Chand Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (Section 302 IPC) alleged to be a contract killing, also charged under Sections 120(B) and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been in custody since 16 June 2023. The …

WakilaversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, six residents of Akarthapa village, sought relief from anticipated arrest in a criminal case (Bhargama P.S. Case No. 225 of 2025) involving alleged mob killing and land‑capture offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The petitioners …

Manish Kumar @ Manish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case registered under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, killed the son of an informant, while the petitioner claimed he was falsely …

Abhishek Mishra @ Rinku MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Mishra, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a pistol and a mobile phone were recovered from him, and he has been in custody since August 2023. The petitioner is also accused in nine other …

Raunak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Raunak Kumar, applied for regular bail in a criminal case (Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑B)A and 26 of the Arms Act. An earlier bail application had been rejected on …

Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was arrested in connection with a planned murder and charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that he participated in a conspiracy to lure the deceased to a cemetery where the …

Manoj ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Manoj Manjhi, applied for regular bail in a murder case (Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025) where he is charged under Sections 103(1), 238(a), 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner …

Masid @ Md. MasidversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, a group of ten villagers, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS 225 of 2025) concerning the murder of Md Azam and related offences. The charge sheet lists offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including murder, attempt to …

Sahil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, feared arrest in a case (Madhuban P.S. Case No. 290 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25, 9 and 27 of the Arms Act, where the deceased was said to have been killed in celebratory firing. The prosecution …

Mukesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case involving offences under Sections 342, 326, 307, 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the real assailant was Shiv Kumar Yadav, while acknowledging a prior …

Birbal Kumar Chauhan @ BengaliversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Birbal Kumar Chauhan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly demanding rangdari and possessing a country‑made pistol. The prosecution alleged that the pistol used for the demand was recovered from the …

Vishal SoniversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vishal Soni was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder allegedly committed with hired criminals. He applied for bail for the third time, claiming he was falsely implicated and that there was no material linking him to the crime beyond …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR records a firearm injury inflicted by co‑accused Abhishek Kumar, and the petitioner’s name only emerged from the …

Lalbabu SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Sugauli, were implicated in a case alleging armed intimidation of an informant’s husband under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that the accused arrived armed, sought information, and that one …

Balram SinghversusThe state of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Balram Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being named an accused in a 2017 case involving alleged assault, robbery and firing at an informant under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR, lodged six days after the …

Raunak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raunak Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for offences under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The only basis for his inclusion was a confessional statement of co‑accused Manish Mandal, from whose mango orchard a country‑made pistol and two live …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 185/2025) involving alleged ransom‑related conspiracy, shooting, and the death of an informant’s daughter. The FIR named five accused and several unknown persons under sections 103(1), 61(2), 308(2), 352 and 3(5) of the …

Adnan Karimi @ Advan KarimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Adnan Karimi, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 349 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, including assault with a pistol and firing at an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused …

Santosh Kumar @ Prashant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Santosh Kumar and Avinesh Kumar Rai, were charged under several IPC provisions, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Arms Act for an alleged assault and caste-based threats at the informant's residence on 3 September 2023. The informant, …

Lakshman Jha @ Lakshman ShastriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, members of the Jha family, were charged under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act based on a complaint alleging assault, intimidation and use of caste slurs. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Special Judge, …

VIRALGIRI JAYANTIGIRI GOSWAMIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

RULE ISSUED AND PARTLY ALLOWED

The petitioner, a journalist, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution and the Indian Arms Act seeking to quash Order No.HVD/125/2020 issued by the Joint Secretary, Home Department, Gujarat, and to obtain an arms licence for personal safety. The petitioner alleged that …

SAYYED AAKIF SAYYAD ZAFARUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sayyed Aakif Sayyad Zafaruddin, filed an interim bail application under Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release pending the hearing of his appeal against a life‑sentence conviction for offences under the UAPA, MCOC Act and IPC. The trial court had …

Belal @ Belal AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Belal Ansari was arrested on 1 July 2025 in connection with a 2023 FIR alleging offences under Sections 341, 324, 326, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR describes a shooting incident near a temple where the petitioner is alleged to have fired at a victim, …

Wasik @ Md. WasikversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md Wasik and Md Chalu, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against them under IPC sections 147, 149, 302, 120 B and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the investigating police, after a “threadbare” …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Sachin Kumar was arrested on 17 September 2025 in connection with a murder case (Bidupur P.S. Case No. 557 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 27 August 2025. The prosecution alleges that unknown persons fired at the informant’s husband, resulting in his death, and that the petitioner confessed to …

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Manoj Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving offences under the IPC and the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR contained only general allegations against all accused …