Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Income Tax Act, 1961

1,056 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 201–400.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VIversusVIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD.

2018 INSC 39924 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd claimed a deduction for lease equalisation charges in its 1999-2000 income tax return. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed it, a decision upheld by the High Court. The Revenue appealed to the Supreme Court, questioning whether such a ded

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-1versusM/S CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.

2018 INSC 40024 April 2018Disposed off

M/s Container Corporation of India Ltd. (CONCOR) claimed a deduction under Section 80‑IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for profits earned from its Inland Container Depots (ICDs) for assessment years 2003‑04 to 2005‑06. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim, the Tribunal allowed deduction only for rolling stock and not

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAIT. JAYACHANDRANversusT. JAYACHANDRAN

2018 INSC 40124 April 2018Disposed off

The respondent, a stock broker approved by Indian Bank, was instructed to purchase securities on the bank's behalf and to use part of the proceeds to pay additional interest to certain public sector undertakings (PSUs) via demand drafts. The Assessing Officer treated the amount of Rs 14.73 crore, paid to the PSUs, as t

ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusBHARAT V. PATEL

2018 INSC 40624 April 2018Dismissed

The respondent, Bharat V. Patel, Chairman and MD of Procter & Gamble India, received Rs 6,80,40,724 on redemption of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) issued by P&G USA in 1997, before the Finance Act, 1999 amendment to Section 17(2) became effective on 1 April 2000. The Revenue argued that the amount should be taxed as

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-IIIversusHCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

2018 INSC 39824 April 2018Dismissed

HCL Technologies Ltd. claimed deductions under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for freight, telecommunication, insurance and software development expenses incurred in exporting software and providing technical services abroad. The Assessing Officer excluded these expenses from the total turnover, leading to a h

K.P. MOHAMMED SALIMversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COCHIN

2008 INSC 52624 April 2008Dismissed

The Income Tax Department conducted searches at the premises of K.P. Mohammed Salim and his associates and, to facilitate coordinated investigation, the Chief Commissioner transferred the cases to the Calicut Investigation Circle under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer then issued a notice und

LALIT KUMAR JAIN AND ANR.versusJAIPUR TRADERS CORPORATION PVT. LTD.

2002 INSC 22924 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Jaipur Traders Corp. Pvt. Ltd., executed a sale deed for an oil mill and received an initial payment, but the balance consideration was withheld pending income‑tax clearance. The parties entered into a written settlement with a director that deferred the balance payment until all formalities were complet

M/S. THIAGARAJAR CHARITIES, MADURAIversusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ANR.

1997 INSC 43224 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Thiagarajar Charities Trust, created in 1962, carried on a business of buying and selling cotton yarn under a board resolution. The Trust claimed exemption from income tax under Section 11 of the Income‑Tax Act, arguing that the business was merely a means to achieve its charitable objects and that any profit was s

ANIL MINDA AND OTHERSversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2023 INSC 28724 March 2023Dismissed

The assessees were searched under two authorisations issued on 13‑03‑2001 and 26‑03‑2001, resulting in panchnamas drawn on 11‑04‑2001 and 26‑03‑2001 respectively. Block assessment notices were issued and assessment orders were passed in April 2003, which the assessees challenged as time‑barred under Section 158BE of th

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GAUHATI & ORS.versusM/S. SATI OIL UDYOG LTD. & ANR.

2015 INSC 26524 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the retrospective amendment to Section 143(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which imposes a 20% additional tax when adjustments increase declared income or reduce loss. The appellant‑Commissioner had levied additional tax on M/s. Sati Oil Udyog Ltd. for assessment years

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALOREversusVENKATESWARA HATCHERIES (P) LTD. ETC. ETC.

1999 INSC 12924 March 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The assessees operated large‑scale poultry hatcheries and claimed that they were industrial undertakings engaged in the manufacture or production of "articles or things" and therefore eligible for investment allowance under s.32A and deductions under ss.80HH, 80HHA, 80I and 80J of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TAMIL NADUversusS. BALASUBRAMANIAN

1998 INSC 15224 March 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), was granted a development rebate under Sections 33 and 34 of the Income‑Tax Act for new machinery used in its business for assessment years 1960‑61 to 1965‑66. In 1967 a partial partition of the HUF allotted the machinery to two coparceners, who subsequently sold it to a th

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESSversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2001 INSC 4524 January 2001Dismissed

Oxford University Press, a branch of the UK university, claimed exemption from income tax for its 1976-77 earnings under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the income belonged to a university existing solely for educational purposes. The Income Tax Officer rejected the claim; the Commissioner (App

ANARKALI SARABHAI, :SHAHIBAG HOUSE, AHMEDABADversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDAHAD

1997 INSC 5324 January 1997Dismissed

Anarkali Sarabhai held 297 redeemable preference shares of Universal Corporation Pvt Ltd, purchased for Rs 2,68,550. The company redeemed the shares, paying the face value of Rs 2,97,000, resulting in a surplus of Rs 30,450. The Income Tax Officer treated the surplus as a capital gain under Section 45 of the Income‑Tax

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGALversusWESMAN ENGG. CO. (P.) LTD.

1991 INSC 1324 January 1991Dismissed

Wesman Engineering Co. (P) Ltd., a licensee, sought a certificate under s.195(2) of the Income Tax Act to remit payments to its foreign collaborators for royalties and cost of working drawings. The Income Tax Officer held the entire remittance taxable and directed 65% TDS. The assessee appealed, contending that the cos

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 26(1) NEW DELHIversusS.R.M.B. DAIRY FARMING (P) LTD.

2017 INSC 113523 November 2017Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Income Tax Circular No. 3 of 2011, which bars filing of High Court appeals where the tax impact is below Rs 10 lakh, applies retrospectively to appeals already pending before the circular came into force. The Court noted divergent views among High Courts and considered the National Li

M/S. GEM GRANITESversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TAMIL NADU

2004 INSC 66723 November 2004Dismissed

Mis. Gem Granites, an exporter of cut and polished granite, claimed a deduction under Section 80‑HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1987‑88. The issue was whether processed granite fell within the exclusionary clause "minerals and ores" in sub‑section (2)(b) of the provision as it stood before the

BIKANER GYPSUMS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJASTHAN

1990 INSC 31923 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Bikaner Gypsums Ltd., a mining company, held a lease for gypsum extraction but the railway had encroached on the leased land, obstructing mining. The parties negotiated a cost‑sharing arrangement for shifting the railway, and the company paid Rs 3 lakh of the total Rs 12 lakh expense. The company claimed a deduction of

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, DELHIversusM/S HCL COM NET SYSTEMS & SERVICES LTD.

2008 INSC 107623 September 2008Dismissed

The assessee, M/s HCL Com Net Systems & Services Ltd, for Assessment Year 1997-98, debited Rs 92,15,187 as bad debts in its profit and loss account. The Assessing Officer (AO) added this amount back to the book profit under clause (c) of the Explanation to section 115JA(2) of the Income‑Tax Act, treating it as a provis

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALAversusSMT. P.K. KOCHAMMU AMMA PEROKE

1980 INSC 18823 September 1980Dismissed

The appellant, a female partner in two firms, omitted from her 1964-65 return the shares of profit attributable to her husband and minor daughter, which under s.64(1)(i) and (iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be included in her total income. The Revenue assessed the omitted amount and imposed a penalty under s.271(

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CALCUTTAversusDALHOUSIE PROPERTIES LTD.

1984 INSC 15723 August 1984Dismissed

Dalhousie Properties Ltd, assessed for the year 1966-67, claimed a deduction of Rs.1,78,784 for municipal taxes under the proviso to section 23(1) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the deduction should be allowed on the basis of the tax liability even though the amount was not fully paid and was under dispute.

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusM/S. CATAPHARMA (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

2007 INSC 77323 July 2007Dismissed

The dispute concerned the assessment year 1997‑98 where the assessing officer had included excise duty and sales tax in the "total turnover" for computing the deduction under section 80HHC(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue appealed, arguing that the plain meaning of "turnover" required inclusion of these t

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusRAJESH JHAVERI STOCK BROKERS PVT. LTD.

2007 INSC 66223 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Rajesh Jha Ver! Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., filed its return for AY 2001‑02 showing a loss, which was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer later issued a notice under Section 148 alleging that the claim of bad debts was not allowable, and initiated reassessment. The r

SMT. SHANTI DEVI L. SINGH AND ANR.versusTAX RECOVERY OFFICER AND ORS.

1990 INSC 15223 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners purchased immovable property at auction sales conducted by the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) for recovery of income‑tax and were issued certificates of sale. They approached the Sub‑Registrar to register the certificates, but the Sub‑Registrar and the Collector of Stamps refused unless stamp duty was paid.

K.C. JOSHIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1985 INSC 9823 April 1985Appeal(s) allowed

K.C. Joshi was appointed as Store Keeper in the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) and, after completing his probation, was placed on the regular establishment. He was an active trade‑union worker and, following union actions, his services were terminated on 29 December 1967 with one month’s pay in lieu of notice, t

GANGA SARAN SONS PVT. LTD. CALCUTTAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER & ORS.

1981 INSC 10123 April 1981Case Allowed

The assessee, Ganga Saran and Sons Pvt. Ltd., incorporated in 1947, paid salary, commission and bonus to its managing director Deo Datt Sharma, who was also its brother‑in‑law and managed the Delhi branch. The Income Tax Officer, after several assessments where the remuneration was allowed as a deduction, issued a noti

TAPARIA TOOLS LIMITEDversusJOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SPECIAL, RANGE -1, NASIK

2015 INSC 24323 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Taparia Tools Ltd issued non‑convertible debentures offering investors a choice of either periodic interest or a one‑time upfront interest of Rs.55 per debenture. The company paid the upfront interest in the years 1995‑96 and 1996‑97 and, following mercantile accounting, recorded it as deferred revenue expenditure to b

MADHUMILAN SYNTEX LTD. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2007 INSC 33523 March 2007Dismissed

Madhumilan Syntex Ltd., a public limited company, failed to deposit Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) within the statutory period for AY 1989-90, though it later paid the amount with interest. The Income Tax Officer issued a show‑cause notice under Section 276B read with Section 278B, treating the company and its directors

UNIVERSAL PLAST LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTA

1999 INSC 12623 March 1999Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two appeals – one by Universal Plast Ltd. (UPL) and another by Guntur Merchants Cotton Press Co. – challenging High Court rulings that licence fees and rent received from leasing out a factory, godowns and machinery were not business income under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both appellants ha

PREMIER CABLE CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

1999 INSC 12823 March 1999Dismissed

Premier Cable Co. Ltd installed machinery in the previous year relevant to assessment year (AY) 1967‑68 and, under sections 33 and 80J of the Income‑Tax Act, was entitled to carry forward unabsorbed development rebate for eight assessment years and unabsorbed deduction for four assessment years. The company altered its

ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANY LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR, PATNA AND ANR.

1993 INSC 10823 March 1993Dismissed

The Associated Cement Company (ACC) entered into a contract with a contractor for loading cement bags and reimbursing certain wage components. ACC paid the contractor as per the contract but did not deduct tax under Section 194C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer issued notices for non‑deduction of

SHARE MEDICAL CAREversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 20223 February 2007Appeal(s) allowed

Share Medical Care, a charitable hospital society, imported medical equipment in 1992‑93 and obtained customs duty exemption under paragraph 2 of Notification No. 64/88. The society later applied for exemption under paragraph 3, claiming eligibility as a non‑profit rural institution, but the Deputy Director General (Me

MANISH MAHESHWARIversusASS TT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

2007 INSC 20423 February 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee company Mis Indore Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. was subjected to a block assessment under Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act after a search was conducted at the residence of its director, Rameshwar Maheshwari, under Section 132. The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 15880 but did not record an

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHINversusMRS. GRACE COLLIS AND ORS.

2001 INSC 11323 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, shareholders of Ambassador Steamship Ltd., received 14 shares of Collis Line Ltd. for each share they held in the amalgamating company under a scheme of arrangement. They later sold 45,318 of these new shares at a profit, and the Income Tax Officer levied capital gains tax, treating the transaction as

RAJASTHAN STATE WAREHOCSING CORPORATIONversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2000 INSC 9623 February 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation (appellant) earned income in AY 1977-78 from interest, warehouse rentals and administrative charges, part of which was exempt under Section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It claimed a full deduction of its business expenditure under Section 37, but the assessing officer

M/S W.T. SUREN AND CO. LTDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY

1998 INSC 11123 February 1998Appeal(s) allowed

W.T. Suren & Co. Ltd transferred its distribution unit to Rallis India Ltd, terminating the employment of the unit's staff. Employees were offered similar jobs with continuity of service; those who did not join received gratuity directly, while the assessee paid the gratuity due to those who joined to Rallis, which hel

M/S MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS, KOTTAYAMversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM

2024 INSC 5323 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Mangalam Publications, a partnership engaged in publishing, filed returns for assessment years 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1992-93 without regular books of account, citing seizure of records. The assessing officer later compared a balance sheet submitted to a bank in 1989-90 with a later balance sheet for 1993-94 and conc

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRASversusURMILA RAMESH

1998 INSC 4023 January 1998Dismissed

The respondents, shareholders of a company in voluntary liquidation, received dividends from the liquidator after the sale of the company's assets. The sale proceeds exceeded the written‑down value of the assets but were less than the original purchase price, so the excess was taxed in the company under Section 41(2) o

GENPACT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

2019 INSC 127722 November 2019Dismissed

Genpact India Private Limited bought back shares from its Mauritius holding company and was assessed a tax under Section 115QA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee denied liability and challenged the assessment order through a writ petition under Article 226, arguing that no statutory appeal was available. The Hig

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL

2013 INSC 77422 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India suspended an Indian Revenue Service officer in 1999 pending two CBI criminal investigations; the Central Administrative Tribunal later quashed the suspension and directed a review, but the government issued fresh suspension orders in 2012 without complying with the Tribunal’s directions, leading the

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATAversusM/S. HOOGL Y MILLS CO. LTD.

2006 INSC 87722 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd., purchased an industrial undertaking from Fort Gloster Industries Ltd. and, under the sale agreement, assumed the vendor’s accrued and future gratuity liability of about Rs 3.5 crore. The assessee claimed depreciation on this amount under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, arguing

HDFC BANK LTD.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2024 INSC 80722 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Income Tax Department ordered HDFC Bank to stop operation of certain lockers and accounts, but later revoked the order only for the accounts, leading bank officials to mistakenly allow a locker to be operated. The department filed a complaint and an FIR was registered against the bank and its officials for multiple

ESCORTS LIMITED AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 29222 October 1992Dismissed

Escorts Ltd. and other assessees challenged the Finance (No.2) Act, 1980 amendment that gave retrospective effect to clause (iv) of Section 35(2) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, arguing it allowed a double deduction for scientific‑research expenditure and violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution. The Co

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA-IIIversusKARNATAKA STATE COOPERATIVE APEX BANK

2001 INSC 38522 August 2001Dismissed

The Karnataka State Cooperative Apex Bank was statutorily required to place a portion of its reserve funds with the State Bank of India or the Reserve Bank of India. The interest earned on these mandatory investments was challenged by the Revenue, which argued that the income was taxable. The Tribunal held the interest

SHIV RAJ GUPTAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI-IV

2020 INSC 46122 July 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Shiv Raj Gupta, former chairman and MD of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd., sold his controlling shareholding to the Shaw Wallace Company (SWC) group and received Rs 6.6 crore as a non‑competition fee under a deed of covenant. The Assessing Officer treated the payment as taxable under s.28(ii)(a) of the Income Tax

VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2016 INSC 33222 April 2016Dismissed

Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU) claimed exemption from income tax under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2004‑05 to 2009‑10, asserting that it is an educational institution solely for education and wholly or substantially financed by the Government. The university generated

M/S. CHILLIES EXPORTS HOUSE LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 42722 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Chillies Export House Ltd., a public limited company engaged in exporting chillies, claimed that its activities of sorting, grading, clipping, stemming and fumigation (the latter performed by a contractor) amounted to "processing of goods" under the Finance Acts, making it an "industrial company" eligible for a co

RAMESH NARAIN SAXENA AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

1996 INSC 56022 April 1996Dismissed

The appellant, an exporter of hides and skins, pledged goat skins to a bank and obtained an overdraft. The skins were damaged due to the bank's improper storage, leading the appellant to file a criminal complaint. A compromise was reached whereby the bank waived Rs 1,93,159 owed by the appellant, which the appellant tr

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusG.R. KARTHIKEYAN, COIMBATORE

1993 INSC 16122 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed

G.R. Karthikeyan, an individual assessee, won Rs 22,000 as prize money in the All India Highway Motor Rally and the Income‑Tax Officer included it in his total income under the definition of "income" in Section 2(24) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribunal and the Madras High Cou

SHRIMANT PADMARAJE R. KADAMBANDEversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

1992 INSC 12022 April 1992Appeal(s) allowed

Shrimant Padmaraje R. Kadambande, a descendant of the former ruler of Kolhapur, received a monthly cash allowance that was discontinued after the State of Kolhapur merged with Bombay under the Bombay Merged Territories Miscellaneous Alienations Abolition Act, 1955. The Act abolished such alienations, but Section 15(1)(

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KANPURversusBEHARI LAL RAM CHARAN LTD.

1987 INSC 12622 April 1987Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income‑Tax appealed against the Allahabad High Court’s decision in favour of Behari Lal Ram Charan Ltd, which allowed the company to set off a capital loss of Rs 3,17,500 incurred in assessment year (AY) 1957‑58 against capital gains of Rs 3,10,200 in AY 1965‑66. The Revenue argued that the loss was

SMT. PADMAVATI JAIKRISHNAversusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT AHMEDABAD

1987 INSC 12322 April 1987Dismissed

Smt. Padmavati Jaikrishna, an individual assessee, claimed a deduction of Rs.10,275 under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for interest paid on loans taken to meet personal obligations such as income‑tax, wealth‑tax and a statutory annuity deposit. The Income Tax Officer held that only a portion of the loan

C.I.T. BOMBAYversusBAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA BAR COUNCIL OF GUJARAT

1981 INSC 9922 April 1981Dismissed

The Bar Council of Maharashtra, a body corporate under the Advocates Act, 1961, derived income from interest on securities and enrolment fees for the assessment years 1962-63 to 1964-65. The Revenue assessed this income, but the Council claimed exemption under section 10(23A) for enrolment fees and under section 11 for

ASHIRWAD ENTERPRISES AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2004 INSC 19322 March 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The Revenue initiated prosecution under Section 276C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income for AY 1988‑89. The assessees filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quash of the prosecution, contending that applications for settlement under Section 245C were pending before the Settlement

GARDEN SILK WEAVING FACTORY, SURATversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT, AHMEDABAD

1991 INSC 8122 March 1991Appeal(s) allowed

Garden Silk Weaving Factory, a registered partnership firm, challenged the Income‑Tax Officer’s addition of Rs 5,08,423 (unabsorbed depreciation and unabsorbed business loss) to its total income for AY 1968‑69. The firm argued that unabsorbed depreciation should be carried forward by the firm, while the Revenue contend

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALPAIGURIversusOM PRAKASH MITTAL

2005 INSC 9322 February 2005Disposed off

The Commissioner of Income Tax appealed against an order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission that had treated a loan claimed by O.P. Mittal as an advance and refused to declare the settlement void. The revenue argued that the settlement was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation and that the Commission could be mo

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIHAR-II, RANCHIversusSMT. SANDHYARANI DUTIA

2001 INSC 10922 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

A Hindu male governed by the Dayabhaga school died intestate, leaving his widow and two daughters. The widow and daughters entered into an agreement to form a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and the widow contributed her share of the inherited property to the HUF, omitting the income from her tax returns for AY 1974-75 an

M/S. ANIS AHMAD AND SONSversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KANPUR & ANR

2008 INSC 7822 January 2008Case Allowed

M/s. Anis Ahmad & Sons, a commission agent for raw hides and skins, filed its 1984‑85 return as a commission agent but the Assessing Officer treated it as a trader and levied a higher tax. After a remand, the Assessing Officer summoned ten traders under s.131(1); five appeared and supported the commission‑agent claim,

KISHAN LALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

1998 INSC 3922 January 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Kishan Lal, an assessee, was levied interest under section 220(2) of the Income‑Tax Act for delayed payment of tax. He filed an application under section 220(2A) seeking reduction or waiver of the interest, but the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) rejected the application without recording any reasons. A writ petit

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JODHPURversusPURUSHOTTAM DAS BANGUR AND ANR.

1997 INSC 5022 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Income Tax Officer had completed assessments for 1969-70 and 1971-72, accepting the assessee's claim of a long‑term capital loss on the sale of shares. Later, a letter from the Deputy Director of the Directorate of Inspection, supported by documentary evidence, indicated that the fair market value of those shares w

KALYAN MILLS LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 24921 November 1986Dismissed

The Union of India sought to recover tax arrears owed by an assessee company and was informed that the amount could be recovered from a debt the appellant, Kalyan Mills Ltd., owed to the assessee. Notices under Sections 46(2) and 46(5A) of the Income Tax Act were issued to the appellant, and the Union filed a suit for

BRIJ LAL & ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

2010 INSC 71421 October 2010Disposed off

The appellants filed settlement applications under Chapter XIX‑A of the Income Tax Act and disputed the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C for default in advance tax. The Supreme Court was asked (i) whether these interest provisions apply to Settlement Commission proceedings, (ii) what the terminal poi

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABADversusSARABHAI HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.

2008 INSC 120221 October 2008Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad appealed against the Gujarat High Court’s judgment in favour of Sarabhai Holdings Pvt. Ltd. concerning interest on a deferred sale consideration. The assessee had sold a business unit and agreed to pay interest at 11% on the unpaid balance, later modifying the payment terms by

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, GUJARAT-III, AHMEDABADversusELLIS BRIDGE GYMKHANA ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 70421 October 1997Case Partly allowed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat sought to assess Ellis Bridge Gymkhana, an unincorporated club, for wealth tax for assessment years 1970‑71 to 1977‑78, arguing that the club fell within the term “individual” in Section 3 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The club contended that an association of persons is not an in

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, MADRASversusK. S. N. BHATT

1983 INSC 15821 October 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, K.S.N. Bhatt, claimed deductions in his wealth‑tax returns for income‑tax, wealth‑tax and gift‑tax liabilities, arguing that these amounts were debts owed on the valuation dates for the assessment years 1964‑65 to 1967‑68. The Wealth Tax Officer allowed only part of the deductions; the Appellate Assistant

SRI S.N. WADIYAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRversusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KARNATAKA

2015 INSC 68221 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the legal representative of the late S.N. Wadiyar, challenged the valuation of vacant land appurtenant to Bangalore Palace for wealth tax purposes. The Wealth Tax Officer had valued the land at market rates, ignoring the restrictions imposed by the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1962, which lim

GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BOMBAY

1999 INSC 43321 September 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The General Insurance Corporation of India, a wholly government‑owned insurer, set aside a sum for redemption of preference shares and debited it to its profit and loss account in accordance with Rule 2(2)(a) of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Rules, 1973. The Income‑Tax Officer treated the amount as r

VIDUR IMPEX AND TRADERS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERSversusTOSH APARTMENTS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 34421 August 2012Dismissed

The Delhi High Court entertained a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 13‑9‑1988 and restrained the vendor from alienating the property. The vendor later sold the suit property to six companies (the appellants) who, in turn, sold it to Bhagwati Developers, all in violation of the injunction. The appella

RAJIV RANJAN SINGH 'LALAN' AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 52721 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard writ petitions filed as public‑interest litigation by two MPs alleging that former Bihar Chief Ministers Lalu Prasad Yadav and Rabri Devi had unduly influenced the transfer of an Income‑Tax Appellate Tribunal member, the appointment of a Special CBI Judge, and the change of public prosecutors in

M/S. K.P. MADHUSUDHANANversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

2001 INSC 38121 August 2001Dismissed

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed its 1986-87 return showing a total income of Rs.6,76,890, but the Assessing Officer added Rs.93,000 as unexplained investment after noting that certain rice purchase transactions were not entered in the books on the correct dates. The assessee explained that cash shortages force

RAMESHWAR AND ORSversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2022 INSC 73821 July 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court clarified the scope of the term "transfer" under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, holding that it includes development and collaboration agreements and licences issued during the suspect period (27‑08‑2004 to 29‑01‑2010). It examined numerous applications concerning projects such as Green Heights, Godr

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAIversusM/S. SRI MANGAYARKARASI MILLS (P) LTD.

2009 INSC 93121 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd., a cotton yarn manufacturer, claimed a deduction of Rs. 61,28,150 for machinery replacement as revenue expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, treating it as capital expenditure, a view upheld by the Commissioner of Inco

M/S. R.R. HOLDING P. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI AND ANR.

2006 INSC 46021 July 2006Disposed off

R.R. Holding Ltd filed its return for AY 1986-87 claiming a loss and later disclosed a commission income of Rs 1.61 crore, prompting a notice under section 148. The assessee sought interest on a tax refund under section 244(1A) and appealed to the Delhi High Court, which held that the matter was covered by the preceden

MAHILA VIKAS MANDAL COLABA AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2005 INSC 30321 July 2005Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra leased land to Mahila Vikas Mandal for a women's hostel, stipulating that any part used for remunerative purposes required prior approval and payment of 50% of the net profit. The Collector later alleged commercial use and demanded 50% of the net income (Rs 19,03,103) as recovery under Section 

THE STATE OF PUNJABversusBALDEV SINGH

1999 INSC 28221 July 1999Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a batch of appeals concerning searches under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. It held that an empowered officer must inform a suspect of his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, and that this duty is imperative, not merely directory. Failure t

ARVIND MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1992 INSC 17621 July 1992Dismissed

Arvind Mills Ltd., a textile mill, paid betterment charges under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 as part of a town‑planning scheme and claimed a deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the payment was a revenue expense. The Income Tax Officer disallowed the deduction; the Appellate Assis

C.I.T. GUJARATversusELECON ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

1987 INSC 17821 July 1987Dismissed

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd., a public limited company, claimed a rebate under Section 84 of the Income‑Tax Act for the assessment year 1964‑65, the second year of its new industrial project. The Assessing Officer initially allowed a rebate of Rs 2,72,372 but on reassessment reduced it to Rs 2,51,222, prompting the comp

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY CITY-III, BOMBAYversusSHANTILAL PRIVATE LIMITED BOMBAY

1983 INSC 8021 July 1983Reference answered

Shantilal Private Ltd entered into a contract to sell folic acid but could not deliver due to a sharp price rise. The dispute was referred to arbitration, which awarded the buyer Rs 1,50,000 as compensation for breach of contract. The assessee claimed this payment as a business loss, but the Income‑Tax Officer treated

BEHARILAL RAMCHARANversusINCOME-TAX OFFICER, SPECIAL CIRCLE B WARD, KANPUR AND ANR.

1981 INSC 11721 July 1981Case Partly allowed

The petitioners, a partnership firm, had a running account with B.R. Sons Ltd. The Income‑Tax Officer issued a notice under s.226(3)(i) of the Income‑Tax Act requiring the petitioners to pay any amount due from them to B.R. Sons Ltd., but the notice did not specify the exact sum. The petitioners filed a sworn affidavit

LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITEDversusPURI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 52321 April 2025Dismissed

Larsen & Toubro (L&T) and Puri Construction Ltd (PCL) entered into a Development Agreement for land development, later supplemented by a Supplementary Agreement and a Tripartite Agreement involving a bank. Disputes arose over alleged economic duress, non‑fulfilment of conditions precedent, and L&T's abandonment of the

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CALCUTTA & ORS.versusRADHESHYAM LADIA

1987 INSC 12121 April 1987Dismissed

The respondent, Radheshyam, was assessed for the years 1960-61, 1961-62 and 1962-63 and was served notices under sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Income‑Tax Officer alleged that his wife had received valuable assets from him without adequate consideration and that the income and capital gains ar

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-GUJARAT-IIversusKWALITY STEEL SUPPLIERS COMPLEX

2017 INSC 127321 March 2017Dismissed

The partnership firm KwalitY Steel Suppliers Complex, consisting of a mother and son, was dissolved after the mother’s death, but the son continued the business. In its return, the firm valued closing stock at cost price, a method accepted by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner of Income Tax, invoking Section 263 o

ASSAM COMPANY LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

2001 INSC 15521 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Assam Company Ltd. and another were engaged in cultivation, manufacture and sale of tea, a composite income taxable under both the Central Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Assam Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1939. The State Agricultural Income Tax Officer refused to accept the agricultural income computation made by the Cen

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAYversusM/S. BANQUE NATIONALE DE-PARIS

1997 INSC 30921 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The non‑resident company Banque Nationale de‑Paris challenged a Super Profits Tax assessment that included interest received on Central and State Government securities. It argued that, under Clause X of Rule 1 of the First Schedule of the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, such interest should be excluded from chargeable pro

KRISHNASWAMY S. PD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 9721 February 2006Dismissed

The appellants, who were the intended purchasers of a property, challenged an order of pre‑emptive purchase made by the Income Tax Department under Section 269UD of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the order was unreasoned and they were denied a hearing. The property owner did not contest the order, and aft

A.L.A. FIRMversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1991 INSC 5921 February 1991Dismissed

The appellant, A.L.A. Firm, a partnership engaged in money‑lending and property transactions, was dissolved on 13 March 1961 and reported a revaluation surplus of $1,01,248 (Rs.1,58,057) in its 1961‑62 return, treating it as neither revenue nor capital. The Income‑Tax Officer initially accepted this view but later, aft

SMT. M.M. AMONKAR & OTHERSversusDR. S.A. JOHARI

1984 INSC 4121 February 1984Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. S.A. Johari, an honorary surgeon attached to Dr. Amonkar Hospital, occupied a small cabin within the hospital premises and paid a monthly compensation. The Amonkar family, owners of the premises, gave notice terminating his attachment and sought his eviction. Johari filed a suit claiming he was a "protected license

BISWANATH BHATTACHARYAversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2014 INSC 4221 January 2014Dismissed

Biswanath Bhatiacharya, who had been detained under COFEPOSA in the 1970s, was served a notice under Section 6(1) of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEMA) to explain the source of his wealth, and later a forfeiture order was passed under Section 7. He challenged the

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT)versusSTONEMAN MARBLE INDUSTRIES & ORS

2011 INSC 6221 January 2011Dismissed

The importers, including Stoneman Marble Industries, were found to have imported rough marble blocks without the required licence and with mis‑declarations, leading to confiscation of the goods under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal reduced the redemptio

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusM/S. EXPRESS NEWS PAPERS LTD.

1998 INSC 3521 January 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Express News Papers Ltd., a public limited company, resolved on 6 December 1962 to pay an interim dividend, payable on 16 January 1963. The Income Tax Officer reduced the rebate available under the Finance Act, 1964 for assessment year 1964‑65, treating the dividend as a reduction trigger. The company contended that, u

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusMIS. KRISHNA STORES

1997 INSC 4721 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa appealed against the High Court's order quashing the Commissioner of Sales Tax's revision of assessment orders for the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71 against Mis. Krishna Stores. The assessments had been reassessed under Sections 12(4) and 12(8) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, and the firm’s appe

M/S. ORIENT TRADING COMP ANY LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALCUTTA

1997 INSC 4821 January 1997Dismissed

M/s Orient Trading Co. held 14,500 shares of Asiatic Oxygen & Acetylene Co. as stock-in-trade, valued at Rs 1,45,000. It exchanged these for 55,100 shares of Asiatic Oxygen Ltd. at a ratio of 38:10. The Income Tax Officer valued the received shares at Rs 5,51,000 (based on market price of Rs 10 per share) and taxed the

HANS RAJ AGARWAL AND ANR.versusCHIEF COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX AND ORS.

2002 INSC 57320 December 2002Dismissed

The appellants sought to set aside a second compulsory purchase order issued by the Central Government under Chapter XX‑C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging that the order was beyond the statutory limitation period, concerned an undivided share contrary to the demarcated portions, and that the consideration was not

M/S. HERO EXPORTS, G.T. ROAD, LUDHIANAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA

2007 INSC 116520 November 2007Appeal(s) allowed

Hero Exports, a trader exporter, earned export turnover from trading goods and additional income from export incentives, miscellaneous income and interest. It claimed that 10% of this other income should be treated as an expense attributable to the export turnover and therefore deducted from the indirect costs under se

WALDIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL

1996 INSC 135520 November 1996Dismissed

Waldies Ltd. was assessed to income tax for AY 1964‑65 and subsequently to surtax under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act. The income‑tax assessment was later reopened under Section 147, increasing the tax liability, and the surtax assessment was rectified under Section 13 of the Surtax Act to allow a deduction for th

ICE & GENERAL MILLSversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE II, MEERUT

1979 INSC 24620 November 1979Appeal(s) allowed

ICE & GENERAL MILLS, a potato manufacturing and cold‑storage firm, was assessed for the year 1961‑62. The Income‑Tax Officer, under section 34(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, initiated reassessment proceedings and in 1965 ordered tax on Rs 1,00,000 of alleged benami income, but the order was annulled in 1967. The depar

R.K. GARG ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC.

1981 INSC 18120 October 1981Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Special Bearer Bonds (Immunities and Exemptions) Ordinance, 1981 and the subsequent Act, which granted anonymity and tax exemptions to holders of special bearer bonds intended to canalise black money. The petitioners argued that the President lacked authority unde

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. TATA TEA CO. LTD. & ANR.

2017 INSC 96020 September 2017Disposed off

The Union of India challenged the constitutional validity of Section 115‑0 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which imposes an additional 10% tax on dividends declared by domestic companies. Tea companies argued that because up to 60% of their income is agricultural, the dividend is agricultural income and therefore only the

RAVI AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2024 INSC 64820 August 2024Disposed off

Ravi Agrawal filed a writ petition seeking retrospective application of the Finance Act, 2022 amendment to section 80DD of the Income Tax Act, which allows a subscriber to discontinue payments to a Jeevan Adhar scheme upon attaining the age of 60 and to use the accumulated benefit. He argued that the amendment should a

SHAKEENA & ANR.versusBANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 92220 August 2019Dismissed

The appellants had taken term loans from Bank of India which later became non‑performing, prompting the bank to invoke sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act and take constructive possession of the mortgaged property. After a public auction on 19 December 2005, the highest bidder was issued a sale certificate on

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusM/S. CLASSIC BINDING INDUSTRIES

2018 INSC 72520 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Classic Binding Industries set up a manufacturing unit in Himachal Pradesh and claimed a 100% deduction under Section 80‑IC of the Income Tax Act for the first five assessment years (2006‑07 to 2010‑11). After completing those years, it claimed another 100% deduction for subsequent years, invoking "substantial exp

AJMERA HOUSING CORPORATION & ANR. ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2010 INSC 53520 August 2010Dismissed

Ajmera Housing Corporation filed an application under section 245C(1) of the Income Tax Act seeking settlement of undisclosed income, initially disclosing Rs.1.94 crore and later revising the annexure to disclose an additional Rs.11.41 crore. The Commissioner of Income Tax objected, arguing that the application did not

GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 61120 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), created under the Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962, sought exemption from income tax under Section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, claiming that its income arose from planning, development, or improvement of cities, towns, and villages. The Income Tax

CENTRAL PROVINCES MANGANESE ORE. CO. LTD.versusI.T.O., NAGPUR

1991 INSC 19720 August 1991Dismissed

The appellant, a non‑resident company exporting manganese ore, was assessed for the assessment year 1953‑54. Customs authorities later found that the company had under‑invoiced its exports, resulting in a finding of under‑invoicing of about Rs 44‑45 lakh. On this basis, the Income‑Tax Officer issued a notice under Sect

INDIAN FINANCIAL ASSN. SEVENTH PAY ADVENTISTSversusM.A. UNNEERIKUTTY AND ANR.

2006 INSC 45720 July 2006Dismissed

The Indian Financial Association of Seventh Day Adventists (the appellant) owned a 30‑cent property containing a church, school and other buildings. It passed a resolution to sell the land and, through a duly executed power of attorney, its representative (defendant No. 2) entered into two sale agreements with the plai

THIRU AROORAN SUGARS LTD., MADRASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

[1997] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 15120 July 1997Dismissed

Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, cultivated sugarcane for its own factory and also bought large quantities of sugarcane from the market. Because part of its income was agricultural and part was business, the company sought to deduct the market value of the sugarcane it used as raw material under Rule 7

SHASHIKANT LAXMAN KALE AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 20820 July 1990Dismissed

The petitioners, an employee of a private‑sector firm and a trade union, challenged the constitutional validity of clause 10‑C inserted by the Finance Act, 1987 into section 10 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, which grants tax exemption on voluntary‑retirement payments only to employees of public‑sector companies. They arg

SHITAL FIBERS LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2025 INSC 74320 May 2025Reference answered

Shital Fibers Ltd. claimed deductions under Sections 80‑HHC, 80‑IA and 80‑IB for the assessment year 2002‑03 and the Revenue disallowed the deductions, leading to a series of appeals up to the Supreme Court. The central issue was the interpretation of sub‑section (9) of Section 80‑IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specif

M/S RADHA KRISHAN INDUSTRIESversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.

2021 INSC 26620 April 2021Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Radha Krishan Industries challenged two orders of provisional attachment of its receivables issued by the Joint Commissioner under Section 83 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, alleging that the orders were ultra vires, lacked a requisite opinion based on tangible material, and violated Rule 1

VAIBHAV GOEL & ANR.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

2025 INSC 37520 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal concerned a corporate debtor, Tehri Iron and Steel Casting Ltd., whose resolution plan was approved by the NCLT on 21 May 2019. The plan listed certain statutory and contingent liabilities, but omitted income‑tax demands for assessment years 2012‑13 and 2013‑14. After the plan’s approval, the Income Tax Depa

DELHI STOCK EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

1997 INSC 29720 March 1997Dismissed

The Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd., a company limited by shares, claimed exemption from income tax under Section 11 read with Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting that its income was derived from property held in trust for charitable purposes. The claim pertained to assessment years before Decemb

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SHIMLAversusM/S AARHAM SOFTRONICS

2019 INSC 23120 February 2019Disposed off

M/s. Aarham Softronics and other assessees set up new manufacturing units in Himachal Pradesh and claimed a 100% deduction of profits under Section 80‑IC of the Income Tax Act for the first five assessment years, followed by a 25% deduction for the next five years. After the initial five‑year period they carried out su

M/S. PROGRESSIVE FINANCERSversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1997 INSC 16620 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Progressive Financers, a partnership of five persons including a minor admitted to the benefits of the firm, applied for registration under Section 184 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 1967-68 and for renewal for AY 1969-70 and 1970-71. The Income Tax Officer rejected the application, treating the firm as an Associat

VODAFONE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS B.V.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2012 INSC 4520 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined Vodafone International Holdings' acquisition of the entire share capital of CGP Investments (Holdings) Ltd., a Cayman Islands company that indirectly held a 52% stake in Hutchison Essar Ltd. (HEL). The Revenue argued that the sale of CGP, together with associated rights and entitlements, amou

C. I. T. MUMBAIversusM/S. EMPTEE POLY-YARN PVT. LTD.

2010 INSC 5020 January 2010Dismissed

The appellant, C.I.T., Mumbai, challenged the assessment that the twisting and texturising of partially oriented yarn (POY) did not constitute "manufacture" under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court examined expert testimony that POY is a semi‑finished yarn which, after undergoing a thermo‑mechanical pr

MIS HIND WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL-V

1995 INSC 7020 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Hind Wire Industries Ltd. was originally assessed for income tax on 21 September 1979. The assessee obtained a rectification of that order on 12 July 1982 under Section 154 of the Income‑Tax Act. A second rectification application was filed on 4 July 1986, which the Income‑Tax Officer rejected as time‑barred; the a

MIS. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. MADRASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1996 INSC 152219 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Ashok Leyland Ltd., a manufacturer of trucks and spare parts, imported certain spare parts and sold them to its truck buyers. The company claimed deductions under sections 80‑E and 80‑I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for profits earned from these imports, arguing that the income was attributable to its "priority industry"

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHIversusBANSI DHAR & SONS

1985 INSC 25219 December 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) that received Rs.2,49,874 as insurance proceeds after the death of the Karta's father. The income from this amount was initially taxed in the Karta's personal assessment, but the Income Tax Officer later treated it as HUF income, leading to assessments for assessment yea

M/S. MEPCO INDUSTRIES LTD. MADURAIversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

2009 INSC 124619 November 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Mepco Industries Ltd. received a power subsidy for two years and initially treated it as a revenue receipt. The assessee argued that the subsidy was a capital receipt and sought revision of assessment orders, which were initially allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax. After the Supreme Court’s decision in Sahney St

J.K. INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 116119 November 2007Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006 – which made Accounting Standard 22 (deferred tax) mandatory – exceeded the Central Government’s rule‑making power under s. 642 of the Companies Act, 1956 and conflicted with the Act’s provisions on true‑and‑fair accounts, Schedule VI a

M/S HUNSUR PLYWOOD WORKS LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 74619 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Hunsur Plywood Works Ltd., a public limited company, claimed a development rebate under Section 33 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 1972-73 to 1974-75, which was initially allowed. The assessing authority later observed that the company had transferred amounts from the development rebate reserve to it

ASSESSING OFFICER CIRCLE (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2(2)(2) NEW DELHIversusM/S NESTLE SA

2023 INSC 92819 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals concerning the Most‑Favoured‑Nation (MFN) clause in India’s DTAA’s with the Netherlands, France and Switzerland. The assessees argued that the MFN benefit should apply automatically when India later entered into a DTAA with another OECD member, even if that third country w

M/S NEW NOBLE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYversusTHE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 AND ANR.

2022 INSC 111119 October 2022Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether societies and trusts claiming exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income‑Tax Act must exist exclusively for educational purposes and not for profit. It held that “solely” means the institution’s objects must be limited to education; any surplus is permissible only if it arises

SANKALP RECREATION PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 106019 September 2019Dismissed

The Union of India acquired a 1053.5 sq.m. property in Mumbai under Section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, but successive auctions from 1994 to 2017 failed to attract a buyer. Sankalp Recreation Private Limited (appellant) offered Rs.32.11 crore, which was rejected, and later bid Rs.30.21 crore—above the Rs.30 crore r

UNIT TRUST OF INDIAversusRAVINDER KUMAR SHUKLA, ETC. ETC.

2005 INSC 42719 September 2005Dismissed

The Unit Trust of India (UTI), a statutory corporation, issued account‑payee cheques to its unit holders and sent them by registered post. Approximately 1,600 unit holders claimed non‑receipt of cheques worth about Rs 3.35 crore, alleging interception and fraud. The unit holders filed complaints before Consumer Forums,

M/S. GEORGE WILLIAMSON (ASSAM) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GAUHATI

2005 INSC 43019 September 2005Appeal(s) allowed

Mis. George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. acquired the Indian undertakings of twelve UK‑registered tea companies under a scheme of arrangement approved by the High Courts and the RBI, which required that the net assets of the acquired business not be depleted. The consideration paid (Rs 490 lakhs) was lower than the net asse

MALABAR FISHERIES CO., CALICUTversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA

1979 INSC 18719 September 1979Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved Malabar Fisheries Co., a partnership dissolved in 1963, which had claimed development rebate under section 33 of the Income‑Tax Act for machinery installed before dissolution. The Income‑Tax Officer withdrew the rebate under section 34(3)(b) and section 155(5), contending that the distribution of the

UKHARA ESTATE ZAMINDARIES (PVT.) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL, CALCUTTA

1979 INSC 18819 September 1979Appeal(s) allowed

Ukhara Estate Zamindaries (Pvt.) Ltd. was incorporated to take over a zamindari estate and issue shares to the lessors. It granted long‑term sub‑leases of coal‑bearing lands to collieries, receiving salami, premium and compensation for compulsory acquisitions. The Income‑Tax Officer treated these receipts as business i

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALAversusALAGAPPA TEXTILE (COCHIN) LTD.

1979 INSC 18919 September 1979Dismissed

Alagappa Textile (Cochin) Ltd. entered into a five‑year financing and management agreement with Kamala Mills Ltd., under which Kamala Mills received remuneration for purchases, sales and management of the mill. The assessee claimed the remuneration as a deductible business expense under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income‑

RAJESHWAR TIWARI AND ORS.versusNANDA KISHORE ROY

2010 INSC 53219 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The employee, Nanda Kishore Roy, complained that his employer had wrongfully deducted Rs.1,640 per month as income tax and failed to deposit it, leading a magistrate to issue summons under sections 406/1208 IPC. The employer argued that the deductions were mandated by the Income Tax Act and that the complaint was essen

SAP LABS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 6, BANGALORE

2023 INSC 39419 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

SAP Labs India Private Limited and several other assessees challenged the Income Tax Officer's assessment on transfer pricing grounds, contending that the arm's length price (ALP) determined by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was not final and could be reviewed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. T

UNION OF INDIA & ORSversusM/S. WILLOWOOD CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 43019 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Willowood Chemicals and another filed writ petitions alleging that the Union of India delayed refunds of integrated tax on exports for periods ranging from 94 to 290 days, violating Sections 16 and 20 of the IGST Act and Sections 54 and 56 of the CGST Act. The Gujarat High Court awarded simple interest at 9% per annum

MAHAVEER KUMAR JAINversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

2018 INSC 37019 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Mahaveer Kumar Jain, a resident of Rajasthan, won a Rs.20 lakh prize in the 1986 Sikkim State lottery. The prize was taxed at source under the Sikkim State Income Tax Rules, 1948, and Jain claimed a deduction under Section 80TT of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer and subsequent authorities held that the

PUNEET SABHARWALversusCBI

2024 INSC 22119 March 2024Dismissed

The CBI filed a case alleging that R.C. Sabharwal, a former public servant, owned assets disproportionate to his known sources of income and that his son, Puneet Sabharwal, abetted him. The trial court framed charges under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 10

RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusTHE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ASSESSMENT) & ANR.

2020 INSC 31319 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Electricity Board (a government company) filed its return for AY 1991‑92 on 30‑12‑1991 claiming 100% depreciation, although the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991 had already restricted depreciation for companies to 75%. The Assessing Officer disallowed the excess 25% depreciation and levied additi

THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHINversusMIS. KESARIA TEA CO. LTD.

2002 INSC 15019 March 2002Dismissed

The case concerned Kesaria Tea Co. Ltd., which had earlier claimed a deduction for a provision made towards purchase tax liability for the years 1978‑81. In the assessment year 1985‑86 the company wrote back the provision, believing that the liability had ceased following the rejection of a special leave petition in th

IMPERIAL CHIT FUNDS (P) LTD.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM

1996 INSC 41219 March 1996Dismissed

Imperial Chit Funds Ltd., a company in liquidation, was served with a tax demand of Rs.1,027 by the Income Tax Officer after winding‑up proceedings had begun. The Official Liquidator argued that the tax claim could not be enforced until the claim was proved in the winding‑up process, invoking the Companies Act’s scheme

M.B. ABDULLAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALA

1990 INSC 9319 March 1990Dismissed

The petitioner was caught with contraband gold worth Rs 20 lakhs, which was confiscated by customs. The assessing officer added the value of the gold to the petitioner’s income under Section 69‑A of the Income‑Tax Act, treating it as income from an undisclosed source. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner reduced the in

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX U.P, LUCKNOWversusJ.K. HOSIERY FACTORY, KANPUR

1986 INSC 4819 March 1986Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether an unregistered partnership firm that became a registered firm could carry forward unabsorbed depreciation from the year it was unregistered (1949-50) and set it off against the partners' income in the subsequent year (1950-51). The Tribunal had denied the set‑off, holding that regist

NIRANJAN & CO. P. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL-I & OTHERS

1986 INSC 4919 March 1986Dismissed

Niranjan & Co. Ltd. filed its 1962 return showing a profit of Rs 2,092 but later discovered that profit from construction work of Rs 10,718.46 had been omitted. The Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) assessed the year‑end tax on 27 Nov 1963, having taken the construction profit into account from the balance‑sheet filed with the

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ORISSAversusORISSA CORPORATION (P) LTD.

1986 INSC 5019 March 1986Dismissed

The assessee, Orissa Corporation, claimed a cash credit of Rs 1,50,000 as loans from three individuals, producing confirmation letters and hundis but could not serve notices under s.131 to the alleged lenders. The Income‑Tax Officer deemed the lenders “name‑lenders”, added the amount as unproved cash credit under s.68

M/S. ANANDA SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL TRUSTversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

2020 INSC 20819 February 2020Dismissed

The Ananda Social and Educational Trust was formed on 30 May 2008 and applied for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act on 10 July 2008, having not yet undertaken any charitable activities. The Commissioner of Income Tax rejected the application on the ground that, in the absence of actual activities, t

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusCH. GANDHI

2013 INSC 11019 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a disciplinary proceeding against Ch. Gandhi, a senior accountant, who was punished with reversion to junior accountant for two years and postponement of future increments. The question was whether this constituted two major penalties under Rule 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification,

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR-1versusSHRI RAJIV BHATARA

2009 INSC 22319 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Board of Income Tax, Jalandhar appealed against the order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court which had upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s decision that surcharge could not be levied on tax assessed under a block assessment where the search was conducted before 1 June 2002. The case involved a search

M/S. MUNJAL SALES CORPORATIONversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA AND ANR.

2008 INSC 21419 February 2008Appeal(s) allowed

Munjal Sales Corporation appealed against disallowances of interest deductions claimed under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer held that interest-free advances given to sister concerns were funded by interest‑bearing loans and thus barred by Section 40(b)(iv). The Tribunal initially

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR,versusM/S. OM PRAKASH S.S. AND COMPANY AND ANR.

2000 INSC 9019 February 2000Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a licence fee paid to the Government for the right to carry on the liquor trade makes the licencee a "buyer" under the explanation to sub‑section (11) of Section 206‑C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the licence merely authorises the holder to conduct business and doe

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1996 INSC 27719 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) received a large income‑tax refund for the life‑insurance business in the assessment year 1963‑64, which it claimed should be treated as a profit and deducted under Rule 2(1)(b) of the Income‑Tax Act. The tax authorities argued that only the portion of the refund that had b

EMIL WEBBERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, V AND M, NAGPUR

1993 INSC 6119 February 1993Dismissed

Ballarpur Paper and Straw Board Mills Ltd. hired foreign personnel, including Emil Webber, to set up a plant in India. Under the contract, the salaries were to be paid free of Indian tax, and Ballarpur paid the tax on Webber’s salary to the tax authorities. The Income Tax Officer treated the tax amount paid by Ballarpu

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE ETC. ETC.versusB. C. SRINIVASA SETTY, ETC. ETC.

1981 INSC 4119 February 1981Dismissed

The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing agarbattis, was dissolved in 1965 and its goodwill was valued at Rs.1,50,000. The goodwill was transferred to a newly formed partnership of the same name. The Income‑Tax Officer did not tax any gain on this transfer, but the Commissioner invoked revisional juris

KAPIL MOHANversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

1998 INSC 48818 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant had deposited Rs.1,57,250 under the Annuity Deposit Scheme of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was to be repaid in ten equal instalments of principal and interest under Section 280-D. After the depositor's death, the balance instalment of Rs.12,013 was paid to his son/executor, the legal representative. Th

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIHAR-II, PATNA.versusBOKARO STEEL LTD. BOKARO

1998 INSC 49018 December 1998Dismissed

Bokaro Steel Ltd., a government‑owned corporation, was in the process of constructing its steel plant and had not yet commenced business. During the assessment years it received (i) rent for quarters provided to contractors’ workers, (ii) hire charges for plant and machinery supplied to contractors, (iii) interest on a

M/S. STATE BANK OF PATIALA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

2015 INSC 84318 November 2015Disposed off

The State Bank of Patiala discounted bills of exchange and, when the drawee defaulted, levied a daily overdue charge as compensation. The revenue argued that this charge constituted "interest" under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974 and was therefore taxable, while the bank contended it was merely compensation

RAFAT ALIversusSUGNI BAI AND ORS.

1998 INSC 43418 November 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rafat Ali, leased premises from the respondents, Sugni Bai and heirs, who later sought eviction under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 on three grounds: rent default, waste causing damage, and nuisance. Both the Rent Control Court and the Appellate Authority found

PRIMA REALTYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 131718 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Prima Realty, a partnership firm, entered into a compulsory purchase agreement with the Union of India for a property in Chembur. The Central Government was required to tender the consideration within one month of the purchase order, but the cheque issued to Prima Realty was incorrectly made out to "Prime Realty Ltd" a

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAJ, ORISSAversusDHADI SAHU

1992 INSC 31918 November 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee concealed income of minor children and the Income‑Tax Officer referred the case to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (IAC) under Section 274(2) of the Income‑Tax Act because the minimum penalty exceeded Rs 1,000. The reference was made before the amendment of Section 274(2) which, from 1 April 1971, re

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAIversusM/S I-VEN INTERACTIVE LIMITED, MUMBAI

2019 INSC 116618 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee filed its return for AY 2006-07 under the E‑Module scheme and the Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act on 5 Oct 2007 to the address recorded in the PAN database. The assessee claimed that it had changed its registered address and that the notice was therefore not ser

VATSALA SHENOYversusJOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2016 INSC 96918 October 2016Case Partly allowed

The partners of the dissolved partnership firm Mis. Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works sold the firm's assets as a going concern to an Association of Persons (AOP-3) after winding‑up proceedings. The Assessing Officer treated the partners' share of the sale proceeds as capital gains in their individual hands, while the busin

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAIversusANJUM M.H. GHASWALA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 51918 October 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Income‑Tax Settlement Commission, created under Section 245B of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, could waive or reduce the statutory interest payable under Sections 234A, 234B and 234C when passing settlement orders under Section 245D(4). The Court held that the term "terms" in Section 2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARATversusGUJARAT FLUORO CHEMICALS

2013 INSC 63318 September 2013Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioner, Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat, challenged the claim of the respondent, Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals, that the Revenue should pay interest when the total of advance tax and TDS installments paid exceeds the assessed tax. The issue centered on whether the Revenue is liable to pay interest on the excess

SUBRATA SEN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 44918 September 2001Disposed off

The petitioners, former officers of Indian Oil Corporation (Assam Oil Division) who retired before 1 December 1994, challenged a government notification dated 10 March 1995 that revised the pension formula only for officers retiring on or after that date. They argued that the cut‑off date was arbitrary and discriminato

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA (THROUGH STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND CONSTITUTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)versusSUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 74618 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI), as a secured creditor, sought to enforce its charge over imported machinery that had been stored in a private bonded warehouse and remained unpaid of customs duty. The company was wound up on 1 December 2003, and the Official Liquidator applied for possession of the good

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – I, CHANDIGARHversusM/S. ABC PAPERS LIMITED

2022 INSC 84418 August 2022Disposed off

M/s ABC Papers Ltd. challenged assessment orders for assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14, which led to a series of appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and two High Courts (Punjab & Haryana and Delhi). The core dispute was which High Court has jurisdiction un

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONversusUNION OF INDIA

2020 INSC 49418 August 2020Dismissed

The Centre for Public Interest Litigation filed a writ petition seeking a fresh National Disaster Management Plan, specific minimum relief standards, and direction to use the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) for COVID-19, as well as to channel all contributions to the NDRF instead of the PM CARES Fund. The Court

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX-I, AHMEDABADversusGOLD COIN HEALTH FOOD PVT. LTD.

2008 INSC 93818 August 2008Disposed off

The assessee, Gold Coin Health Food Pvt. Ltd., filed a return showing a loss. The Income Tax Department levied a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging concealment of income. The issues were whether the term “income” includes losses, whether the penalty can be imposed when the returned fi

SHIELA KAUSHISHversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI

1981 INSC 14218 August 1981Appeal(s) allowed

Shiela Kaushish, a taxpayer, constructed a warehouse in Delhi and let it out to the American Embassy under several leases, eventually receiving a total rent of Rs.34,797 per month from April 1968. For the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71, the Income‑Tax Officer treated the actual rent received as the "annual value"

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-VIversusM/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2008 INSC 84518 July 2008Case Partly allowed

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi-VI) appealed against Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., contending that the Revenue must obtain clearance from the Committee of Disputes (COD) within one month before filing appeals against a public sector undertaking. The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals for not securing such clea

P.R. PRABHAKARversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COIMBATORE

2006 INSC 44318 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed

P.R. Prabhakar, who exported his own products and also procured export contracts for others on commission, earned a commission of Rs 56,693 and incurred a loss of Rs 6,372 on the export of goods in AY 1990‑91. He claimed a deduction under s.80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner d

MAHABIR INDUSTRIESversusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2018 INSC 54318 May 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Mahabir Industries, a polythene manufacturer in Himachal Pradesh, claimed tax deductions under Section 80‑IA for two years, then under Section 80‑IB for five years, and after a substantial expansion in AY 2006‑07, under Section 80‑IC. The Assessing Officer allowed the 100% deduction for AY 2006‑07 and 2007‑08 but denie

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MEERUT AND ANR.versusM/S. HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO. LTD

2007 INSC 63318 May 2007Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Mis. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., a Korean non‑resident, had a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India for a turnkey contract to design, fabricate, install and commission an oil platform for ONGC. The assessee argued that the contract was divisible, that the design and fabrication

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPURversusM/S. HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD.

2007 INSC 63418 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur assessed Hindustan Zinc Ltd. for the AY 1996-97, adding Rs 27.08 crore to income because the company wrote down its closing stock of zinc concentrate to the net realizable value based on the London Metal Exchange (LME) price, which was lower than the weighted average cost. The co

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHIversusORIENTAL FIRE & GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.

2007 INSC 64418 May 2007Disposed off

The Commissioner of Income Tax appealed against Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd, contending that the insurer could not claim deductions for a provision for taxation and a reserve for bad and doubtful debts. The Supreme Court examined the computation of income for insurance businesses under Section 44 of the I

DILIP N. SHROFFversusJOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI AND ANR.

2007 INSC 64718 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Hindu Undivided Family, reported a long‑term capital loss on the sale of its one‑fourth share in a property and relied on a valuation report prepared by a registered valuer. The Assessing Officer, after adopting a higher valuation by the District Valuation Officer, levied a penalty under Section 271(1)

SRI T. ASHOK PAIversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

2007 INSC 64918 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

T. Ashok Pai, an individual taxpayer whose returns were prepared by a professional group at Syndicate Bank, filed revised returns after the tax department demanded better particulars. The department later initiated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, alleging concealment of income. The In

M/S. AMBICA INDUSTRIESversusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

2007 INSC 65518 May 2007Dismissed

Ambica Industries, carrying on business in Lucknow, was assessed to central excise there and appealed to the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Delhi, which has jurisdiction over Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and Maharashtra. The appellant filed a further appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABADversusEQUINQX SOLUTION PVT LTD.

2017 INSC 35718 April 2017Dismissed

Equinox Solution Pvt Ltd sold its entire running business, including assets and liabilities, in a single transaction on 31‑December‑1990 and claimed a deduction under Section 48(2) of the Income‑Tax Act, treating the sale as a slump sale of a long‑term capital asset. The Assessing Officer held that the transaction fell

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusSIRPUR PAPER MILLS ETC. ETC.

1999 INSC 11618 March 1999Dismissed

Sirpur Paper Mills made contributions to an approved superannuation fund amounting to Rs 2,70,911 for the current year and Rs 2,14,785 for the preceding five years. The assessing officer allowed a deduction of only 80% of the contributions and spread it over five years, relying on a Central Board of Direct Taxes notifi

STONECRAFT ENTERPRISESversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1999 INSC 11918 March 1999Dismissed

Stonecraft Enterprises, an exporter of granite, claimed a deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which allows a deduction of up to 50% of profits from export of goods, but excludes "mineral oil, minerals and ores". The Tribunal held that granite is a mineral and therefore excluded, rejecting the ded

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusSHIVAKAMI CO. PVT. LTD.

1986 INSC 4418 March 1986Dismissed

Shivakami Co. Pvt. Ltd., a private company, sold unquoted shares of two other companies and claimed a loss. The Income‑Tax Officer, relying on the first proviso to section 12B(2) of the 1922 Income‑Tax Act (now section 52 of the 1961 Act), deemed the break‑up values of the shares and assessed capital gains. The Tribuna

GVK INDUSTRIES LTD. &ANR.versusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR.

2015 INSC 13118 February 2015Dismissed

GVK Industries Ltd. and its director entered into an agreement with a Swiss non‑resident company (NRC) to act as a financial advisor for a power project, receiving a "success fee" of 0.75% of the debt on loan closure. The Income Tax Officer refused to issue a No‑Objection Certificate for remittance of the fee, directin

COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, DIBRUGARHversusDOOM DOOMA INDIA LTD.

2009 INSC 21018 February 2009Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dibrugarh appealed against judgments upholding the assessment of Doom Dooma India Ltd., a tea manufacturer, for assessment years 1988-89 to 1991-92. The core issues were the meaning of "depreciation actually allowed" under Section 43(6)(b) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 and the method of co

RAM BAIversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1999 INSC 7118 February 1999Appeal(s) allowed

Ram BAI's land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and she received compensation which was later enhanced with solatium and interest by a civil court, a decision affirmed by the High Court. She disclosed the interest as income in a return filed under Section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the Inc

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKAversusM/S BEDI AND COMPANY PVT. LTD.

1998 INSC 9818 February 1998Dismissed

The assessee was assessed for AY 1960-61 and later a sum of Rs 32,58,500 was identified as a loan advanced for a paper‑mill project. The Income‑Tax Officer reopened the assessment and treated the amount as business income. The assessee’s appeals before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income‑Tax Appellate T

NATIONAL TRAVEL SERVICESversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI, VIII

2018 INSC 3518 January 2018Matter referred to larger bench

National Travel Services, a partnership firm, obtained a loan from Jetair Private Ltd and subscribed to its equity in the names of two partners, who were registered shareholders holding 48.19% of the shares but held them for the benefit of the firm. The firm challenged whether Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, as

M/S. SOUTHERN MOTORSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 5518 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed

M/S Southern Motors, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, issued tax invoices for vehicle sales and later granted post‑sale discounts through credit notes, retaining only the net amount. The Assessing Authority disallowed deduction of these discounts from total turnover, insisting that a d

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search