Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

V D TULZAPURKAR

115 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ERNAKULAM

1985 INSC 23431 October 1985Dismissed

The appellant, formerly Bank of Cochin Ltd., purchased foreign‑currency negotiable instruments as part of its banking business and later realised the proceeds in foreign banks. When the Indian rupee was devalued on 6 June 1966, the rupee value of these foreign‑exchange assets increased by Rs 4,65,515. The Income‑Tax Of

WORKMEN OF METRO THEATRE LTD., BOMBAYversusMETRO THEATRE LTD., BOMBAY

1981 INSC 13531 July 1981

The workmen of Metro Theatre Ltd. challenged an Industrial Tribunal award that revised wage scales and dearness allowance effective from 1‑1‑1977, arguing that it should have been retrospective to 1‑1‑1974, that dearness allowance ought to be linked to the cost‑of‑living index, and that the tribunal could grant a more

G. M. SHAHversusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR

1979 INSC 22630 October 1979Case Allowed

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the detention of Shabir Ahmed Shah under Section 8(2) of the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978. The petitioners argued that the grounds of detention were vague and did not fall within the statutory definitions of "acting in any manner prej

SMT. SAROJ AGGARWALversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,U.P.

1985 INSC 21730 September 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Saroj Aggarwal, was the widow of a partner who died in 1959. After his death a new partnership deed was executed, admitting her and an adopted son as partners. The deceased had unabsorbed speculation losses from earlier years. In the assessment year 1962‑63, the appellant claimed to set off those losses

JIWANI DEVI PARAKIversusFIRST LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, CALCUTTA AND ORS.

1984 INSC 16530 August 1984Disposed off

The petitioner, a lessee of premises in Calcutta, challenged the State’s continued requisition of part of his building under the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provision) Act, 1947, which had been renewed repeatedly since 1958 for a government showroom. He argued that the Act could not become p

RAINBOW STEELS LTD. AND ANR.versusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.

1981 INSC 2230 January 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Government, under Section 3A of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948, notified that turnover from "old, discarded, unserviceable or obsolete machinery" would attract a 5% sales tax. A thermal power plant, in perfect working condition, was sold by the State Electricity Board to appellant 1, who used i

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALOREversusSRI J.H. GOTLA, YADAGIRI

1985 INSC 18729 August 1985Dismissed

The assessee, an oil‑mill owner, gifted part of his machinery to his wife and three minor children and a firm was formed by his wife and another person. The firm leased the mill premises and machinery and the assessee rendered management services, receiving commission. The assessee had large losses carried forward from

GOVT, MEDICAL STORE DEPOT, GAUHATIversusTHE SUPDT. OF. TAXES, GAUHATI & ORS.

1985 INSC 18829 August 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Government set up a Medical Store Depot in Gauhati to procure and supply medical stores to various government institutions on a "no profit‑no loss" basis. The depot did not apply for registration as a dealer under the Assam Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1956 or the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, claiming that its

DR. VIJAY KUMAR KATHURIA & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1983 INSC 5429 April 1983Dismissed

The petitioners, Dr. Vijay Kumar Rathuria and another, filed two Special Leave Petitions seeking an interim order that the status quo of their postgraduate studies at Medical College, Rohtak be maintained as of 1 October 1982. A dispute arose over whether their provisional admissions had been cancelled before that date

ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LTD. ETC.versusT.C. SHRIVASTAVA & ORS.

1984 INSC 7329 March 1984Disposed off

Four quarry workers were charged with misconduct for participating in an illegal strike and related acts, and after giving written explanations they were subjected to a departmental inquiry that found them guilty. The General Manager dismissed all four under Standing Order No. 17, which the arbitrator later held requir

S.P. GRAMOPHONE COMPANYversusC.I.T PATIALA

1986 INSC 929 January 1986Dismissed

The appellant, S.P. Gramophone Co., sought registration of its partnership under Section 26A of the Income Tax Act, 1922 for AY 1961‑62 after a fresh partnership deed added four new partners to the original two, who were disabled. The Income Tax Officer rejected the application, alleging that the new partners were mere

SAMBANGI APPLASWAMY NAIDU & OTHERSversusBEHARA VENKATARAMANAYYA PATRO AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 16228 August 1984Appeal(s) allowed

Behara Venkataramanayya Patro, the mortgagor, executed two usufructuary mortgage deeds in 1939 and 1942 in favour of Sambangi Thavitinaidu, who was then a sitting tenant of the same property. After obtaining a preliminary decree for redemption, the mortgagor died and his legal representatives sought a final decree and

HINDUSTAN ALUMINIUM CORPORATION LTD.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

1981 INSC 13228 July 1981Dismissed

Hindustan Aluminium Corporation Ltd., a manufacturer of aluminium ingots, billets, rolled products and extrusions, challenged the assessment that taxed only ingots at the lower rate while treating the other products as unclassified items at a higher rate under the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act. The High Court held that r

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KANPURversusM/S. J.K. COTTON MANUFACTURERS LTD.

1984 INSC 4928 February 1984Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether tax liabilities arising from settlements under the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, which remained unpaid at the valuation dates, could be deducted as debts owed in computing net wealth under the Wealth‑Tax Act, 1957. The assessee companies argued that the unpa

C.I.T CENTRAL, CALCUTTAversusNATIONAL TAJ TRADERS

1979 INSC 25027 November 1979

The Commissioner of Income Tax cancelled assessments of National Taj Traders under section 33B(1) on the ground that the assessments were erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Appellate Tribunal vacated the Commissioner’s ex parte order and remanded the case for fresh assessment, directing that the assessee be give

PRABODH VERMA AND OTHERS, ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS, ETC.

1984 INSC 13027 July 1984Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a strike by teachers in Uttar Pradesh in 1977, after which the State appointed 2,257 "reserve pool" teachers on a temporary basis under Ordinance No.25 of 1977. Subsequent Ordinances No.10 and No.22 of 1978 sought to absorb these teachers and give them preferential treatment in future vacancies, whi

KALLYANIversusNARAYANAN AND ORS.

1980 INSC 3627 February 1980Appeal(s) allowed

Karappan, a Hindu father, executed a registered deed (Ext. P‑1) describing the distribution of his property among his two wives, their children and his father's second wife. After his death, Kallyani, the widow of his son Raman, sued for partition and a one‑fourth share in the properties listed in Schedule A, B and C.

MADHUSUDAN DASversusSMT. NARAYANI BAI AND OTHERS

1982 INSC 8625 November 1982Appeal(s) allowed

Jagannathdas and his wife Premwati, childless, created a trust over their estate. The appellant claimed he had been adopted by them on September 24, 1951, making the trust void and entitling him to a half share. The trial court found the adoption valid based on oral testimony, the adoption deed, and surrounding circums

MESSRS. P.M. PATEL & SONS AND OTHERS, ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS, ETC.

1985 INSC 20625 September 1985Dismissed

The petitioners, beedi manufacturers, challenged the 1977 notifications that brought the beedi industry within Schedule I of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, arguing that home workers who roll beedis at their residences were not "employees" under section 2(f) and that the scheme co

RICHPAL SINGH & ANR.versusDESH RAJ SINGH & ORS.

1981 INSC 14925 August 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned agricultural lands in Bulandshahr district where Smt. Ram Kali, a disabled land‑holder, leased the plots to Uttam Singh and Murli Singh in 1945. After her death, her brother Dan Sahai, also a disabled person, succeeded her interest and the lessees continued as year‑to‑year tenants. The question was w

INDO INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIESversusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, UTTAR PRADESH.

1981 INSC 7725 March 1981Appeal(s) allowed

Indo International Industries manufactured hypodermic clinical syringes and, for the assessment year 1973‑74, claimed that the turnover up to 30 Nov 1973 should be taxed at 4 % as "hospital equipment" under Entry 44 (or at 3½ % as an unclassified item) and the turnover from 1 Dec 1973 to 31 Mar 1974 at 7 % as an unclas

SADHU SINGH RODA S/O BUTA SINGH ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1984 INSC 2125 January 1984Disposed off

The petitioners, all serving life sentences, claimed that having satisfied the detention periods prescribed in Paragraph 516‑B of the Punjab Jail Manual, they were entitled to have their cases considered for premature release. They argued that Paragraph 516‑B is a statutory rule and cannot be altered by the State Gover

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusB. RAGHURAMA SHETTY ETC.

1981 INSC 7424 March 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The assessees, owners of rice mills, bought paddy from agriculturists (who were exempt from sales tax) and milled it into rice for sale. The Karnataka Sales Tax Authority levied purchase tax on the paddy under section 6(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The assessees contended that paddy and rice are the same co

MECLEOD & CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

1983 INSC 18223 November 1983Dismissed

Mecleod & Co. Ltd., a Calcutta‑registered company, was appointed managing agent and secretary‑treasurer for two jute mills (Nellimarla and Chitavalsah) that were registered as dealers under the Orissa Taxation (on Goods carried by Road and Inland Waterways) Act, 1959. Mecleod handled the storage of jute in godowns at K

DR. K. GEORGE THOMASversusTHE C. I. T. KERALA, ERNAKULAM

1985 INSC 20323 September 1985Dismissed

K.G. Thomas, a journalist and propagator of Christian ideals, received large sums from the Indian Christian Crusade, U.S.A., which he claimed were personal gifts. The Income‑Tax Officer treated the amounts as remuneration for his vocation of preaching and publishing, and taxed them as business income for the assessment

GULAM ABBAS AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

1983 INSC 12723 September 1983Case Allowed

The Supreme Court was asked to decide whether two graves on a disputed plot in Varanasi could be shifted to alleviate recurring sectarian violence between Shia and Sunni communities. The Court held that moving the graves was not irreligious nor a violation of Sunni fundamental rights, as Articles 25 and 26 of the Const

MAN SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1985 INSC 18323 August 1985Dismissed

The petitioners, who are cycle‑rickshaw pullers hiring rickshaws for a day, challenged the Punjab Cycle Rickshaws (Regulation of Licence) Act, 1976 which bars owners of rickshaws from obtaining a licence unless they themselves ply the vehicle. They argued that the Act, lacking a mechanism to enable them to acquire rick

BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF M.P. & OTHERS

1982 INSC 4123 March 1982Dismissed

Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd., a sugar‑cane crushing factory, purchased cane from both reserved and non‑reserved areas, directly from growers and through a cane‑growers' cooperative society. Under Section 21 of the Madhya Pradesh Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply & Purchase) Act, 1958, it was required to pay a commission

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL DAMOHversusVRAJ LAL MANILAL & CO. & OTHERS

1982 INSC 2523 February 1982Dismissed

The respondents, manufacturers of bidis, imported tobacco and other raw materials into Damoh municipality, paid octroi duty, used the materials to manufacture bidis and exported the finished products. They claimed a refund of the octroi under Rule 27(b) of the Octroi Rules, which provides a refund when imported raw mat

C.I.T. BOMBAYversusBAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA BAR COUNCIL OF GUJARAT

1981 INSC 9922 April 1981Dismissed

The Bar Council of Maharashtra, a body corporate under the Advocates Act, 1961, derived income from interest on securities and enrolment fees for the assessment years 1962-63 to 1964-65. The Revenue assessed this income, but the Council claimed exemption under section 10(23A) for enrolment fees and under section 11 for

UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusG.M. KOKIL AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 6521 March 1984Dismissed

The Union of India appealed a decision of the Central Government Labour Court which had granted overtime wages at double the ordinary rate to 78 employees of the India Security Press, Nasik, under s.59 of the Factories Act read with s.70 of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. The appellants argued that the r

UNION OF INDIAversusANNAM RAMALINGAM ETC. ETC.

1985 INSC 3021 February 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed against the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision striking down Section 28 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 on the ground of excessive delegation of legislative power. Section 28 prohibits a licensed gold dealer from carrying on money‑lending or banking business on the security of any article or

SMT. M.M. AMONKAR & OTHERSversusDR. S.A. JOHARI

1984 INSC 4121 February 1984Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. S.A. Johari, an honorary surgeon attached to Dr. Amonkar Hospital, occupied a small cabin within the hospital premises and paid a monthly compensation. The Amonkar family, owners of the premises, gave notice terminating his attachment and sought his eviction. Johari filed a suit claiming he was a "protected license

DR. KARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR & ANR.

1985 INSC 25620 December 1985Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Karan Singh claimed ownership of six boxes of jewellery and valuable articles stored in the Srinagar Toshakhana, seeking exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Wealth Tax Act as heirlooms. The High Court refused his application for a physical inspection of the items, holding that no useful purpose would be served

ICE & GENERAL MILLSversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE II, MEERUT

1979 INSC 24620 November 1979Appeal(s) allowed

ICE & GENERAL MILLS, a potato manufacturing and cold‑storage firm, was assessed for the year 1961‑62. The Income‑Tax Officer, under section 34(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, initiated reassessment proceedings and in 1965 ordered tax on Rs 1,00,000 of alleged benami income, but the order was annulled in 1967. The depar

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, WEST BENGALversusUSHA KUMAR & ORS.

1979 INSC 24720 November 1979Case Partly allowed

Woomesh Chandra Banerjee executed a deed of trust in 1939 transferring all his properties to a trust that allocated one‑half of the income for religious purposes and the other half for family expenses. After his death his son, the deceased, became trustee. Upon the son’s death, the question arose whether the trust prop

M/ S. BADRI PRASAD JAGAN PRASADversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW

1985 INSC 20020 September 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, a Hindu undivided family (HUF) carrying on business, claimed relief under section 25(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 for the assessment year 1949-50, asserting that a partial partition of the HUF on 11 October 1948 and the formation of a partnership firm on 12 October 1948 constituted a succession of the b

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, PATNAversusRAGHUBIR NARAIN SINGH

1984 INSC 3920 February 1984Dismissed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patna, appealed against the assessment of Raghubir Narain Singh's net wealth under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The issues concerned how to value assets and debts, including pending decree amounts and agricultural income‑tax liabilities, for computing net wealth under Section 7 and Section 

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, BIHAR, PATNAversusMAHARAJA KUMAR KAMAL SINGH

1984 INSC 3820 February 1984Dismissed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bihar appealed against the Patna High Court’s decision that Maharaja Kumar Kamal Singh’s right to receive compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act should be valued at nil because of arrears of agricultural income‑tax. The central issue was whether such tax arrears could be deducted

HARCHARAN SINGHversusSHIV RANI AND ORS.

1981 INSC 4320 February 1981Dismissed

Harcharan Singh, a tenant of a shop in a U.P. cantonment, failed to pay rent for 1965‑66. The landlord sent a combined notice of arrears and eviction by registered post on 9 November 1966, which the tenant refused to accept on 10 November. The landlord sued for eviction under the U.P. Cantonment (Control of Rent & Evic

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHIversusBANSI DHAR & SONS

1985 INSC 25219 December 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) that received Rs.2,49,874 as insurance proceeds after the death of the Karta's father. The income from this amount was initially taxed in the Karta's personal assessment, but the Income Tax Officer later treated it as HUF income, leading to assessments for assessment yea

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P.versusMACNEILL AND BARRY LTD., KANPUR

1985 INSC 24019 November 1985Dismissed

The respondent, a dealer in stationery, sold ammonia paper and ferro paper and claimed they were unclassified goods liable to tax at 2% under s.3 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. The Sales Tax Officer classified them as "paper other than hand made paper" under Notification ST‑3124/X‑1012(4)‑1965, attracting a 6% rate,

J.M. BHATIA, APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX & ORS.versusJ.M. SHAH

1985 INSC 19919 September 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent was assessed for wealth tax on Rs.6,07,690 including jewellery worth Rs.4,15,942 for AY 1969-70. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) excluded the jewellery under s.5(1)(viii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, and no appeal was filed, rendering the order final in the ordinary sense. After the Finance (N

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALAversusALAGAPPA TEXTILE (COCHIN) LTD.

1979 INSC 18919 September 1979Dismissed

Alagappa Textile (Cochin) Ltd. entered into a five‑year financing and management agreement with Kamala Mills Ltd., under which Kamala Mills received remuneration for purchases, sales and management of the mill. The assessee claimed the remuneration as a deductible business expense under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income‑

NAIB SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

1983 INSC 4119 April 1983Dismissed

Naib Singh, originally sentenced to death for murder, had his sentence commuted to "imprisonment for life" and had served 22 years (including remissions). He claimed that life imprisonment could not be executed in Indian jails and that, after serving 14 years of rigorous imprisonment, he should be released absent a for

GANPAT ROY AND OTHERS ETC.versusTHE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS ETC.

1985 INSC 6219 March 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two civil appeals filed by tenants (Ganpat Roy and others) who challenged orders notifying a "deemed vacancy" of their non‑residential premises under Section 12(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The tenants argued that the District M

C.I.T., MADRASversusK.S. RATHNASWAMY

1979 INSC 26818 December 1979Dismissed

The case concerned K.S. Rathnaswamy, a Ceylon citizen who owned a share in a joint family house in Tamil Nadu but spent most of his time in Ceylon. He filed income‑tax returns claiming resident status, while the Revenue argued he was a non‑resident because he neither maintained nor had a dwelling place in India under S

CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, A.P., HYDERABADversusSMT. GODAVARI BAI

1986 INSC 2018 February 1986Dismissed

The deceased partner of a banking firm issued a cheque of Rs.3 lakhs to the firm, which was credited to the accounts of his three minor grand‑nephews. After his death, the widow (assesse) omitted this amount from the estate valuation, arguing that it was a gratuitous transfer of an actionable claim governed by s.137 of

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.versusM. PADMANABHAN NAIR

1984 INSC 23817 December 1984Dismissed

The respondent, a retired government employee, received his pension and gratuity more than two years after retirement, prompting a suit for liquidated damages in the form of interest. The District Court awarded interest at 6% per annum, which the High Court affirmed, and the respondent did not cross‑appeal the rate. Th

J. D. JAINversusTHE MANAGEMENT OF STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

1981 INSC 20717 December 1981Dismissed

J.D. Jain, a cashier of State Bank of India, was charged with altering a letter of authority to withdraw Rs 1,500 instead of Rs 500, withdrawing the excess amount and misappropriating Rs 1,000. A departmental enquiry found him guilty and discharged him. The Industrial Tribunal, exercising powers under S. 11A of the Ind

POKAR RAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

1985 INSC 9317 April 1985Appeal(s) allowed

On 23 August 1983 Bhanwaria, the son of Pokar Ram, was shot and later died, leading to an FIR under sections 307, 447, 149, 148, 379 and 827 IPC, and subsequently an offence under section 302 IPC was added. The accused, Chandan Singh, was not arrested until 29 September 1983, when he applied for anticipatory bail under

MANICK CHAND PAUL & OTHERS ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 8217 April 1984Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by licensed gold dealers challenging several provisions of the Gold Control Act, 1968 (as amended) and its associated rules on the grounds that they violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 301 and 302 of the Constitution. The petitioners argued that sections 16(7), 52, 79 (and it

RAMESH CHANDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1985 INSC 517 January 1985Appeal(s) allowed

Ramesh Chand was convicted under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Om Prakash based on the prosecution's claim that he, along with two others, stabbed the victim at night near Hindon Bridge and was found with a blood‑stained knife. The defence argued that Chand was merely the taxi driver, t

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITEDversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1983 INSC 20116 December 1983Appeal(s) allowed

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, a manufacturer and service provider for aircraft, entered into a 1951 contract with the President of India (the owner) to service, repair and overhaul Air Force aircraft. The contract required the contractor to supply spare parts when the owner failed to do so, with the parts to be treated as

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD.versusTHE STATE OF ORISSA

1983 INSC 20216 December 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.'s (HAL) manufacture of MIG engines for the Government of India constituted a contract of sale liable to Central Sales Tax or a works contract exempt from tax. The Government of India, under a licence from the USSR, entrusted HAL to assemble and fit the engin

BRITISH INDIA CORPORATION LTD.versusMARKET COMMITTEE, DHARIWAL & ANOTHER

1982 INSC 10116 December 1982Dismissed

British India Corporation Ltd., whose head office in Kanpur purchased raw wool and sent it to its Dhariwal mill, was assessed market fees by the Dhariwal Market Committee under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. The company argued that no purchase or sale occurred within the Committee’s notified area, c

SHEONANDAN PASWANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

1982 INSC 10016 December 1982Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the withdrawal of a criminal case against the former Chief Minister of Bihar and others under Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The State had appointed a new special public prosecutor, L.P. Sinha, who applied to the Special Judge for permission to withdraw, citing lack of p

K.M. MOHAMAD ABDUL KHADER FIRMversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

1984 INSC 19416 October 1984Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, 1976 (Act II of 1976) which amended the 1970 Act by introducing graded tax rates based on taxable turnover and prohibiting the passing on of the tax to consumers. They argued that the amendment exceeded the State’s legisl

RENUSAGAR POWER COMPANY LTD.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND ANR.

1984 INSC 14516 August 1984Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a suit filed by Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. seeking a declaration that three claims (unpaid regular interest, delinquent interest, and compensatory damages) were beyond the scope of an arbitration clause could be stayed under Section 3 of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement)

DHANANJOY DASversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ANR.

1982 INSC 6316 August 1982Dismissed

The appellant, Dhananjoy Das, was detained under Section 3(3) of the National Security Act, 1980 and was served with four paragraphs of grounds. He challenged the order on the basis that the first paragraph was vague and that the grounds related to law and order rather than public order, violating his rights under Arti

C.I.T. WEST BENGAL - III & ORS. ETC.versusORIENTAL RUBBER WORKS ETC .

1983 INSC 17615 November 1983Dismissed

The Income Tax Department seized the books of account and documents of Oriental Rubber Works under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and retained them beyond the statutory period of 180 days. The assessee contended that the Revenue failed to communicate the Commissioner’s approval and the recorded reasons for

CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LTD. AND ANR. ETC.versusCOFFEE BOARD, BANGALORE ETC. ETC.

1980 INSC 8315 April 1980

The Coffee Board conducts export auctions of coffee and requires registered exporters to furnish security deposits and, under a 1977 circular, contingency deposits or bank guarantees equal to the sales tax that would have been payable despite the exemption granted by Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The

J.R. VOHRAversusINDIA EXPORT HOUSE PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER

1985 INSC 2514 February 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant landlord created a three‑year limited tenancy for the first respondent under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and sought possession of the premises at the tenancy's expiry. After the tenant failed to vacate despite two registered notices, the landlord obtained a warrant of possession from t

IBRAHIM AHMAD BATTIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS

1982 INSC 7013 October 1982Case Allowed

Ibrahim Ahmad Batti, a Pakistani national, was detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA) on 1 July 1982 for alleged smuggling. The grounds of detention were served in English and Urdu within five days, but Urdu translations of the bulk of the documents rel

H. C. SHARMA AND OTHERSversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS

1983 INSC 7713 July 1983Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two writ petitions filed by junior engineers of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (DMC) challenging the corporation's recruitment and promotion practices for Assistant Engineer posts. Petitioners argued that the DMC should suspend direct recruitment, honor a 50:50 promotion‑direct recruitment q

GUDA VIJAYALAKSHMIversusGUDA RAMCHANDRA SEKHARA SASTRY

1981 INSC 6813 March 1981

Guda Vijayalakshmi (petitioner) filed a maintenance suit in Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, while her husband filed a divorce suit under the Hindu Marriage Act in Udaipur, Rajasthan. The petitioner sought transfer of the divorce suit to Eluru under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) so that both matters could be he

S. KANDASWAMY CHETTIARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1984 INSC 23312 December 1984Dismissed

The tenants of several buildings owned by Hindu, Christian and Muslim religious public trusts and public charitable trusts challenged a 1976 Government of Tamil Nadu notification that exempted all such buildings from the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. They argued that Section 29 of the Act del

S. M. MAHENDRU AND COMPANY ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1984 INSC 23412 December 1984Dismissed

The petitioners, tenants in a building owned by an Apex Co‑operative Society, challenged a 1976 notification issued under section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 which exempted all buildings owned by co‑operative societies from the Act’s provisions. They argued that the blanket exempti

SHARLF-UD-DINversusABDUL GANI LONE

1979 INSC 23412 November 1979Dismissed

The appellant, Sharif‑ud‑Din, filed an election petition challenging the election of Abdul Gani from the Handwara constituency. The petition was dismissed by the Jammu & Kashmir High Court because the copies of the petition were attested by the appellant’s advocate, Piyare Lal Handoo, rather than by the appellant himse

SATYAVIR SINGH AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. ETC. ETC.

1985 INSC 19612 September 1985Dismissed

The appellants, employees of the Research and Analysis Wing, were dismissed under clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution and Rule 19 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, without a charge‑sheet or inquiry, after a violent pen‑down strike and inti

RAM CHANDER AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

1983 INSC 6812 May 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The accused police officers were tried for murder, assault and creating false evidence after Balwant Singh died while in police custody. The Sessions Judge acquitted them, finding the prosecution’s case implausible and the evidence unreliable. On appeal, the High Court reversed the acquittal, relying chiefly on the pre

MAYA RANI PUNJversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI,

1985 INSC 24811 December 1985

Maya Rani, the assessee for assessment year 1961-62, failed to file her income‑tax return by the due date of 28 September 1961 and eventually filed it on 3 May 1962, after the Income Tax Act, 1961 had come into force on 1 April 1962. The Income Tax Officer imposed a penalty of Rs 4,060 under section 27(1)(a) of the 196

OM PRAKASH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1983 INSC 2411 March 1983Dismissed

The case involved the murder and dacoity of village Pradhan Mauji Lal. The prosecution alleged that nine accused entered the house at night, assaulted the deceased and his family, and looted property. The key issues were whether the first information report (FIR) was ante‑timed and whether Section 157 of the CrPC requi

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR.versusUMED RAM SHARMA & ORS.

1986 INSC 1311 February 1986Disposed off

The Himachal Pradesh government sanctioned a 5‑km road in 1977 but construction stalled at about 3 km due to obstruction and lack of funds, leaving hill‑area residents without essential road access. The residents wrote to the High Court seeking relief; the High Court, treating the letter as a writ petition, directed th

M. LACHIA SETTY & SONS LTD. ETC. ETC.versusTHE COFFEE BOARD, BANGALORE

1980 INSC 1969 October 1980Dismissed

The Coffee Board conducts pool auctions for coffee where bids are submitted in sealed forms and the Sale Conducting Officer (the Chief Marketing Officer) decides the successful bidders. M. L. Lachia Setty & Sons Ltd. and Giri Coffee Works had their bids accepted despite not being the highest, but later failed to take d

BABUBHAI & CO. & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS

1985 INSC 809 April 1985Dismissed

The State of Gujarat issued notices under section 54 of the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 and Rule 27 of the Bombay Town Planning Rules, 1955 demanding that lands occupied by Babubhai & Co. be handed over to the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad, as the lands had vested in the corporation under section 53(a) for publ

JAIN MALLEABLESversusBHARAT SAHAY

1981 INSC 1988 December 1981Dismissed

The respondent, a government employee and landlord, sought eviction of the appellants under section 14A of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, claiming he needed the premises for personal occupation because earlier government notifications (9‑Sept‑1975 and a special order of 22‑Jan‑1976) required him to vacate his allott

SHYAM LAL SHARMA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA

1985 INSC 2398 November 1985Dismissed

The petitioners, railway employees, were dismissed or removed for participating in a strike without any enquiry. They filed writ petitions, which were transferred to the Supreme Court and ultimately dismissed. The petitioners then filed review petitions alleging that they were denied a chance to argue the merits, that

SHREE SAJJAN MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, M.P, BHOPAL AND ANR,

1985 INSC 2248 October 1985Dismissed

Sajjian Mills Ltd, a public limited company, incurred a statutory liability to pay gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and actuarially determined its total liability of Rs 48,59,431 for the assessment year 1973‑74. It made a provision of Rs 20 lakhs in its books, added it back in its return, and claimed a

BANWARI LAL KOTIYAversusP.C. AGGARWAL

1985 INSC 1348 May 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a member of the Delhi Stock Exchange, sued the non‑member respondent for Rs. 5,923 arising from share transactions. Each contract note bore a wide‑ranging arbitration clause referring disputes to the Exchange’s Rules, Regulations and Bye‑laws, specifically Bye‑law 247 which provided for a reference to tw

PERIA NACHI MUTHU GOUNDER AND ORS.versusRAJA THEVAR (DEAD) AND ORS.

1985 INSC 208 February 1985Dismissed

Muthammal, the absolute owner of certain lands, executed a deed of settlement in 1925 endowing the properties to a family temple and appointed herself as trustee for life. In 1930 she executed a registered deed of cancellation and later alienated the properties, selling them to the father of the appellants. After her d

STATE BANK OF TRAVANCOREversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA

1986 INSC 38 January 1986Dismissed

The State Bank of Travancore, a subsidiary of SBI, maintained its books on a mercantile basis and charged interest on advances it deemed "sticky" (highly doubtful of recovery) by debiting borrowers but crediting the amounts to an "Interest Suspense Account" instead of its profit‑and‑loss account. It claimed that such i

DILHARSHANKAR C. BHACHECHAversusTHE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, AHMEDABAD

1986 INSC 48 January 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a grandson and accountable person, paid estate duty on a bungalow that his grandparents had settled by a joint will. After the wife died, duty was paid on her share; when the husband later died, the revenue claimed duty on his half of the property, arguing that he became the full owner and that section 2

WORKMEN OF WILLIAMSON MAGOR & CO. LTD.versusWILLIAMSON MAGOR & CO. LTD. & ANR.

1981 INSC 1977 December 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The workmen of Williamson Magor & Co. alleged that the management arbitrarily promoted junior clerks to the Special Grade, superseding the legitimate claims of senior employees, thereby victimising them. The Industrial Tribunal found the promotions unjustified but declined to grant relief because no promotion norms exi

DADAJI ALIAS DINAversusSUKHDEOBABU & ORS.

1979 INSC 2327 November 1979Dismissed

In the 1978 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election for the Armori constituency (reserved for Scheduled Tribes), the appellant Dadaji was declared elected, claiming membership in the "Mana" community. The unsuccessful candidate challenged the election, arguing that Dadaji did not belong to any Scheduled Tribe listed

ASHOK KUMAR MITTALversusMARUTI UDYOG LTD, & ANR.

1986 INSC 307 March 1986Disposed off

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Mittal, applied for an allotment of a Maruti 800 car but due to a computer error his application was recorded for a Maruti truck; the company agreed to consider his case under the manufacturer's discretionary 5% quota. In the course of correspondence, Maruti Udyog disclosed its existing prac

ABHJJIT SEN & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1983 INSC 1916 December 1983Disposed off

Four candidates who had failed to secure admission to MBBS courses challenged the answer key used in the Multiple Choice Objective Type Test conducted by Kanpur University. They argued that the key answers for two zoology questions were demonstrably wrong, and that their own answers, supported by recognized textbooks,

R. SRIHARI NAIDUversusGOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.

1985 INSC 186 February 1985Dismissed

The Regional Transport Authority (RTA) initially issued a notification under s.57(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 to invite applications for stage‑carriage permits, but the RTA was later found to be improperly constituted for lacking a non‑official member as required by s.44. After being reconstituted, the RTA did n

RAJ PRAKASH CHEMICALS LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 275 March 1986Dismissed

Raj Prakash Chemicals Ltd., the sole Indian manufacturer of acrylic ester monomers, challenged the grant of Additional Licences to diamond exporters that allowed import of those monomers despite their being placed in the "Limited Permissible" list under the Import Policy 1985‑88. The core issue was the meaning of "spec

D.K. TRIVEDI AND SONS AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1986 INSC 285 March 1986Dismissed

The petitioners, holders of quarry and mining leases for minor minerals in Gujarat, challenged a series of state notifications and a circular that altered rates of royalty and dead rent and classified building stones. The core issue was whether Section 15(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1

BHAGWAN DAS SITA RAMversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

1984 INSC 535 March 1984Dismissed

A larger Hindu undivided family (HUF) was partitioned in 1945, after which a smaller HUF (the assessee) filed voluntary returns for assessment years 1946‑47 to 1949‑50. The Revenue sought to assess the assessee under Section 34 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922, invoking the second proviso to Section 34(3) after the four‑yea

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANDHRA PRADESHversusM. CHANDRA SEKHAR

1984 INSC 2294 December 1984Dismissed

The assessee filed voluntary income‑tax returns after the statutory deadline prescribed under s.139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer levied interest under clause (iii) of the proviso to s.139(1) and treated the assessee as in default, imposing penalties under s.271(1)(a). The assessee argued that

H. ANRAJ ETC.versusGOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU ETC.

1985 INSC 2214 October 1985Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether state lotteries organised by Tamil Nadu and West Bengal could be taxed under the states' sales‑tax statutes. The petitioners, dealers in lottery tickets, argued that lottery tickets are not "goods" but merely actionable claims, rendering the amendments to the Tamil Nadu General Sales

GULAM ABBAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1981 INSC 1883 November 1981Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined a writ petition filed under Article 32 by the Shia community of Mohalla Doshipura, Varanasi, seeking enforcement of their customary rights to perform religious rites on nine specific plots and structures, rights previously affirmed by civil courts and Wakf registrations. The petition challeng

THE DHARANGADRA CHEMICAL WORKSversusDHARANGADHRA MUNICIPALITY & ANOTHER

1985 INSC 1923 September 1985Dismissed

The appellant, Dharangadhra Chemicals, challenged the levy of octroi duty at an enhanced rate imposed by Dharangadhra Municipality under its Octroi Rules and Bye‑laws of 1965. The dispute centered on whether the municipal rules could be brought into force without a statutory exemption from the Saurashtra Terminal Tax a

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY AND OTHERSversusMAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED & ORS.

1983 INSC 1102 September 1983Dismissed

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (M&M) sought a declaration under Section 72A of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, to carry forward the accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation of International Tractor Company of India Ltd. (ITCI) after their amalgamation. The Specified Authority, after a screening committee, recommended that ITCI

CHIRANJIT LAL ANANDversusSTATE OF ASSAM & ANR.

1985 INSC 1652 August 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a supplier of rations to the Central Reserve Police Units in Assam, was assessed sales tax for supplying "meat on hoof" under the Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947. He contended that "meat on hoof" was merely a term used by the military for live goats intended to be slaughtered for meat, and therefore fell withi

SCIENTIFIC ENGLNEERING HOUSE (P) LTD.versusCOMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH

1985 INSC 2351 November 1985Appeal(s) allowed

Scientific Engineering House (P) Ltd. entered into two 1961 collaboration agreements with Metrimpex Hungarian Trading Company to obtain technical know‑how for manufacturing microscopes and theodolites. The foreign collaborator supplied a complete set of drawings, designs, charts, plans and related literature (the "docu

STATE OF ASSAM & ORSversusBANSHIDHAR SHEWBHAGWAN & CO.

1981 INSC 1561 September 1981Appeal(s) allowed

During World War II the Government of India acquired land for an aerodrome and later leased the unused 300‑acre portion to Banshidhar, who cleared the jungle and developed a tea garden. After the lease was taken, the Government claimed the land was needed for defence purposes and subsequently decided to auction the lea

STATE OF TAMIL NADU ETC.versusRAMALINGA SAMIGAL MADAM ETC.

1985 INSC 1171 May 1985Dismissed

The State of Tamil Nadu sought to bar a civil suit filed by a religious Math seeking declaration of title and an injunction over 3.55 acres of land, arguing that the nature of the land (ryoti vs. poromboke) had already been decided by the Settlement Officer under section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conv

STATE OF ORISSA & OTHERSversusTHE TITAGHUR PAPER MILLS COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

1985 INSC 431 March 1985Disposed off

The State of Orissa issued notifications under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, imposing a 10% purchase tax on bamboos and standing trees agreed to be severed. Petitioners challenged the validity of these notifications, arguing that the transactions were not sales of goods, that the tax amounted to double taxation, and

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search