Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

VIKRAMAJIT SEN

89 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusMAGNUM EQUITY SERVICES LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 87130 November 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Magnum Equity Services Ltd., a corporate entity formed by converting a stock‑broking partnership, was entitled to a fee‑continuity exemption under Paragraph 1(4) of Schedule III of the SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub‑Brokers) Regulations, 1992, after three of its original partners resigne

SECR. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.versusGRADE-I DASS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.

2014 INSC 51030 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, Grade‑I officers of the Delhi Administration Subordinate Service (DASS), claimed a second financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) after completing 24 years of service. Because the feeder grade (Grade‑I DASS) and the next promotional grade (Grade‑II of the Delhi Andaman

M.V. JAYARAJANversusHIGH COURT OF KERALA & ANR.

2015 INSC 7830 January 2015Disposed off

M.V. Jayarajan delivered a public speech in Kannur criticizing a Kerala High Court order that prohibited meetings on public roads, using language that the court deemed abusive, including calling judges "idiots" and employing the regional term "sumbhan". The High Court convicted him of criminal contempt under Section 12

LIC OF INDIAversusINSURE POLICY PLUS SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 94629 December 2015Dismissed

The petitioners, a company dealing in the purchase and resale of life‑insurance policies, challenged LIC's circulars of 2003 and 2005 that refused to register assignments of policies to firms engaged in trading such policies. They argued that Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 makes policies transferable and assigna

THE KERALA BAR HOTELS ASSOCIATION &ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2015 INSC 94929 December 2015Dismissed

The Kerala Bar Hotels Association and other hotel operators challenged the Kerala government's 2014‑15 policy that restricted foreign liquor (FL‑3) licences to only five‑star hotels, alleging violations of Articles 14, 19 and 47 of the Constitution. The State argued that the policy is a reasonable classification aimed

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusVIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 94429 December 2015Dismissed

The Central Bank of India sued Virudhunar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. and its directors (respondents 2‑4) for recovery of credit facilities totalling about Rs 12 lakh. The directors had executed personal guarantee deeds on 30 August 1974, but the company already owed approximately Rs 7.68 lakh before that date. The bank c

PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION P. LTD.versusM/S. HARYANACONCAST LIMITED &ANR.

2015 INSC 94729 December 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a Company Court or an Official Liquidator can control the sale of secured assets by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act when the borrower is a company under winding up. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Ltd, the secured creditor, sought to enforce its security over the land of Harya

PRAMODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS.

2015 INSC 94829 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior lecturer in a private polytechnic, claimed that the vacant post of Principal must be filled by promotion under Rule 3(3) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981. The Director of Technical Education rejected this claim, applying the Government Polytechn

M/S. S.K.L. CO.versusCHIEF COMMERCIAL OFFICER & ORS.

2015 INSC 94529 December 2015Disposed off

The appellant, M/s. S.K.L. Co., challenged a notification by the Railways that leased Front Second Class Luggage Rakes (FSLR) and Ventilated Parcel Vans (VP) to private lessees through an auction, alleging that the lease violated Sections 70 and 71 of the Railways Act, 1989 by giving undue preference and that the Railw

MALLELLA SHYAMSUNDERversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2014 INSC 74929 October 2014Dismissed

The appellant, Mallella Shyamsunder, was convicted for the murder of his wife, Kalyani, who died from extensive burns after allegedly being beaten and doused with kerosene over a dowry dispute. The deceased gave two dying declarations to a police officer and a Judicial First Class Magistrate, both of which were found t

M.P. SINGH BARGOTIversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

2014 INSC 81427 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

M.P. Singh Bargoti, an Inspector in the Madhya Pradesh Police (Fingerprint Branch), retired on 31 March 1998 without being promoted to Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP). The Administrative Tribunal had directed that a combined gradation list be prepared including his name for promotion, but the list was either not

BALDEV KRISHANversusSATYA NARAIN

2013 INSC 57327 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Baldev Krishan, the landlord, filed an eviction suit under s.13(1)(h) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, claiming bonafide need for himself, his wife and family. The trial court and the first appellate court decreed in his favour, but during the pendency the landlord's wife died. The Hi

NCT OF DELHI AND ORSversusJAGJIT SINGH AND ORS.

2015 INSC 17927 February 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the operation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. It held that an acquisition proceeding is deemed to have lapsed when an award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was passed at leas

RAMAKANT MISHRA @ LALU ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2015 INSC 17527 February 2015Dismissed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 498A and 3048 of the IPC for the death of the appellant's wife, who died from severe burns allegedly after a dowry demand. The prosecution proved, on a pre‑ponderance of probability, that the death occurred within seven years of marriage, was unnatural, and was linked to rec

SEBI THROUGH ITS CHAIHMANversusROOFIT INDUSTRIES LTD.

2015 INSC 86426 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a summons on 23 July 2002 to Roofit Industries Ltd. demanding documents and information. The company failed to comply despite several extensions and a reminder dated 5 September 2002, leading the Adjudicating Officer to impose a penalty of Rs 1 crore under Sectio

A. R. DAHIYAversusSEBI

2015 INSC 86526 November 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a promoter, acquired more than 15% of a listed target company and made a public offer to buy remaining shares at Rs 8.75 per share. He had earlier bought back shares held by a state financial institution (HSIDC) at Rs 23.75 per share using post‑dated cheques, but failed to disclose this transaction in th

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusAJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ANR

2015 INSC 86826 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court that had set aside its termination of several District Government Counsels and ordered a reconsideration of their renewal. The core issue was whether the State, under Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Uttar Prade

RAM CHARAN SINGH PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

2015 INSC 104026 November 2015Dismissed

The appeal filed by Ram Charan Singh Prajapati against the State of U.P. and others concerned the validity of a judgment rendered under Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the applicability of the Uttar Pradesh Government Legal Remembrance's Manual. The appellant challenged the impugned judgment, se

GUJARAT MINERAL DEV. CORPN.versusRAM SANG BHAILALBHAI &ANR.

2015 INSC 16826 February 2015Dismissed

The Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation (GMDC) acquired land in villages Bhuri and Rajpardi for a lignite project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed compensation at low rates, which were later increased by the Reference Court. The High Court, noting that the a

M/S. COMPETENT AUTOMOBILES CO. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2015 INSC 16226 February 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether acquisitions made under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 could be declared lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. It held that a declaration of lapse requires a clear factual finding t

MOTILAL YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2014 INSC 81025 November 2014Dismissed

The appellant Motilal Yadav was convicted, along with six co‑accused, for kidnapping a six‑year‑old boy and demanding ransom, under IPC sections 364A read with 34 and 120B. The trial court sentenced each accused to life imprisonment and a fine, and the High Court of Patna affirmed the conviction. The appellant challeng

HIND CHARITABLE TRUST SHEKHAR HOSPITAL PVT., LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 64625 September 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court issued clarifications to its earlier interim order dated 18 September 2014 concerning admissions to private medical colleges. It held that the order also applies to institutions that sought an increase in intake capacity but were denied permission after any renewal or inspection in the current academi

STATE OF PUNJABversusM/S. BAN DEEP SINGH & ORS.

2015 INSC 60525 August 2015Disposed off

The State of Punjab ordered a re‑auction of two properties of the Punjab State Leather Development Corporation after the highest bids, which were only marginally above the reserve price, were submitted by the respondents. The respondents had paid the earnest money and 25% of the bid amount, but the Director of Industri

SUKHVINDER SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 42125 June 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Sukhvinder Singh, a combatant soldier recruited in 2001, was invalided out of service in 2002 with a hearing impairment assessed at 6‑10% disability. The Medical Board held the disability neither attributable nor aggravated by military service and below the 20% threshold, denying him disability pension under Regulation

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusICAP INDIA PVT. LTD.

2015 INSC 85424 November 2015Case Partly allowed

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) appealed against the Securities Appellate Tribunal’s (SAT) order that limited a stock broker’s "annual turnover" to the brokerage earned, thereby reducing the registration fee payable by ICAP India Pvt Ltd, a broker in the wholesale debt market. The Supreme Court examin

GEORGE BHAKTANversusRABINDRA LELE & ORS.

2014 INSC 67524 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a private complaint under Section 200 CrPC alleging forgery and fraud in connection with a machinery supply contract, leading the magistrate to take cognizance of offences under Sections 425, 468 and 471 IPC. The respondents obtained a stay of the cognizance by invoking Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC, a

A. PRABHAKARA REDDY & CO.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2015 INSC 60024 August 2015Dismissed

The appellants, contractors engaged in government construction projects in Madhya Pradesh, challenged the demand of a 1% welfare cess under the Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996, arguing that the levy was retrospective because their contracts were executed before the State Welfare Board wa

VINOD KUMAR SUBBIAHversusSARASWATHI PALANIAPPAN

2015 INSC 35424 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Vinod Kumar Subbiah filed for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging mental cruelty by his wife, Saraswathi Palaniappan, who later sought restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 and maintenance. The trial court, after examining extensive evidence, found the wife’s abusive conduct—ins

RAMCHANDERversusANANTA

2015 INSC 14824 February 2015Dismissed

The husband, an engineer, filed a suit for divorce under Sections 13(1)(i‑a) and 13(1)(i‑b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging mental cruelty and desertion by his wife, a draftsman. The wife counter‑claimed that she faced dowry harassment, alleged an extra‑marital affair by the husband, and had withdrawn a criminal co

K. DEVAKIMMA & ORS.versusTIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS & ANR.

2015 INSC 35023 April 2015Case Partly allowed

The appellants, small shop‑owners in Tirumala, challenged the compensation awarded for their land acquired by the State for the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Reference Court had fixed a market value of Rs.80‑100 per square foot based on escalation of values of adjacent l

SRI MALAPRABHA CO-OP SUGAR FACTORY LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2015 INSC 59321 August 2015Dismissed

The State of Karnataka fixed the price of rectified spirit at Rs.6 per litre by a Government Order under Rule 17 of the Karnataka Excise (Manufacture and Bottling of Arrack) Rules, 1987, allowing captive distilleries to retain only Rs.5 per litre while the balance Rs.1 per litre was payable to the State. The appellant,

CITIBANK N.A.versusHITEN P. DALAL & ORS.

2015 INSC 59421 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from a money decree that was later set aside, where Citibank N.A. had received 9% IRFC bonds worth Rs.50 crore from Canbank Financial Services Ltd. (Canfina) and subsequently sold them in the market. The issue was how to calculate the restitution amount under Section 144 of

CHITRAversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2015 INSC 59521 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, holders of FL3 foreign liquor licences, were unable to use their licences for the full financial year because of court‑issued injunctions and other extraneous circumstances. They challenged the demand to pay the full annual licence fee under Rule 14 of the Foreign Liquor Rules, seeking a remission and

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusP.R. SAMANTA

2015 INSC 50121 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) invited applications for a self‑financing housing scheme in 1985. The respondent paid a registration deposit of Rs.15,000 and later declined the flat allotment, seeking a refund with 15% interest instead of the 7% stipulated in the scheme brochure. DDA refunded the amount with 7% i

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusHITENDER KUMAR SONI

2014 INSC 49521 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Hitender Kumar Soni, a temporary employee on probation, absented himself from duty and submitted a resignation on 7 October 1997, which was accepted by the Government on 16 June 1998. He later sought to cancel the resignation, but the request was denied and the matter proceeded through the Central Administrative Tribun

K. SRINIVASversusK. SUNITA

2014 INSC 79119 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The husband and wife were married in 1989; the wife later filed a criminal complaint against the husband and his family under several IPC provisions and the Dowry Prohibition Act, which led to their arrest. The husband filed for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and alleged irretrievable breakdown, and the wife was lat

M/S. MODERN HOTELversusCOMMISSIONER OF EXCISE & ORS.

2015 INSC 58619 August 2015Dismissed

The partnership firm Modern Hotel held an FL‑3 licence to run a bar, but renewal was denied because a partner had earlier incurred abkari dues and the proviso to Rule 13A(5) of the Foreign Liquor Rules required that at least 50 % of such arrears be cleared. The firm paid additional sums over several years and later, un

SUJASHA MUKHERJIversusTHE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA, THR. REGISTRAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 13919 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Sujasha Mukherji, who had secured the highest aggregate marks in the written test for recruitment as a District Judge, was disqualified after her marks in one paper were moderated from 55% to 37%, causing her to fall below the 40% minimum required per paper. She challenged the moderation before the Supreme Court, argui

KOSHA INVESTMENTS LTD.versusSECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR.

2015 INSC 67518 September 2015Dismissed

Kosha Investments Ltd, having already held more than 15% of Snowcem India Ltd (SIL), acquired additional shares between June and August 1999 that exceeded the 5% threshold of the paid‑up capital in a financial year, but failed to make the public announcement mandated by SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares & Takeove

M/S. SOORAJMULL NAGARMULLversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 57917 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar initiated acquisition of land belonging to M/s. Soorajmull Nagarmull in 1981 under Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, taking possession but failing to publish an award. Subsequent notifications in 1995‑96 attempted a fresh acquisition. The High Court held that the 1981 acquisition remained

STATE OF M.P. & ORS.versusMALA BANERJEE

2015 INSC 22717 March 2015Dismissed

The case concerned whether lecturers/teachers employed by the Madhya Pradesh Education and Tribal Welfare Department were entitled to the second increment (Kramonnati) under the Kramonnati Scheme introduced on 19 April 1999. The State Government had granted this benefit to teachers only from 1 August 2003, arguing that

ROXANN SHARMAversusARUNSHARMA

2015 INSC 12917 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The mother, Roxann Sharma, and the father, Arun Sharma, contested custody of their infant son Thalbir, who was less than five years old. The Goa civil court initially granted interim custody to the mother with visitation rights to the father. A single judge of the High Court of Bombay at Goa later reversed this, awardi

HARISH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 87116 December 2014Case Partly allowed

Harish Kumar was married to Manisha, who suffered severe burn injuries on 13 September 1993 and died five days later. He was charged under Sections 304B (dowry death) and 498A (dowry cruelty) of the IPC. The trial court convicted him on both counts; the High Court upheld the convictions. On appeal, the Supreme Court ex

STATE OF GUJARATversusM/S KOTHARI AND ASSOCIATES

2015 INSC 78816 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat awarded a contract to M/s Kothari & Associates for canal lining, but repeatedly delayed handing over the site, forcing the contractor to seek four extensions of time. Each time the contractor claimed compensation for the delay, the State denied it, and the work was eventually completed in 1980. The

A.P. POWER COORDINATION COMMITTEE & ORS.versusMIS. LANCO KONDAPALLI POWER LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 103316 October 2015Dismissed

The dispute involved the A.P. Power Coordination Committee and related entities (appellants) and M/s. LanCo Kondapalli Power Ltd. (respondent) over capacity‑charge bills and a claim for reimbursement of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under their Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). The key questions were whether the Limitation

PRATAP KISHORE PANDAversusAGNI CHARAN DAS

2015 INSC 79216 October 2015Dismissed

The Orissa Public Service Commission (OPSC) conducted a 1974‑75 competitive exam for Lower Division Assistants, but the number of SC/ST candidates selected was far below the reserved quota. The State Government filled the remaining reserved seats by sponsoring candidates through the Employment Exchange and selecting th

AJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARYversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ANR.

2015 INSC 12016 February 2015Disposed off

Ajay Kumar Choudhary, a Defence Estate Officer, was suspended on 30 September 2011 for allegedly issuing incorrect NOCs on land records. The suspension was extended four times, totalling several years, without a charge sheet for most of the period. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) directed that the suspension

UNION OF INDIAversusFACULTY ASSOCIATION OF ALLMS

[2014] 14 S.C.R. 165116 January 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained review petitions filed by the Union of India challenging its earlier decision on reservation in faculty posts at AIIMS. The issue centered on whether Articles 15, 16 and 335 of the Constitution permit reservation in super‑specialty faculty positions. The Court clarified that the power to d

NATIONAL BANK LIMITEDversusGHANSHYAM DAS AGARWAL & ORS.

2015 INSC 3414 January 2015Dismissed

The case concerned a Letter of Credit (LC) issued by National Bank Limited (the opening bank) for a rice export from India to Bangladesh. The bank certified photocopies of shipping documents to the importer without the exporter’s or negotiating bank’s knowledge, which the importer used to obtain the goods. The exporter

STANTECH PROJECT ENGG. PVT. LTD.versusNICCO CORPORATION LTD.

2015 INSC 57013 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Stantech Project Engineering Pvt Ltd filed winding‑up petitions against Nicco Corporation Ltd for unpaid debts that the respondent had admitted. The Company Judge allowed the respondent’s counsel to obtain a concession to pay the debt in installments, thereby postponing the publication of the winding‑up petition. The r

H.S.L.D.C.versusPRAN SUKH & ORS.

2015 INSC 76512 October 2015Disposed off

The Manesar Industrial Welfare Association, representing beneficiaries of land acquired for the Haryana Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSI/DC), challenged a High Court order that enhanced compensation based on sale deeds of two private companies. The Supreme Court upheld that order, but the Asso

ASGER IBRAHIMAMINversusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

2015 INSC 76412 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, who had served LIC for over 23 years and resigned after turning 50, sought pension under the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995, which were given retrospective effect. The corporation denied the claim, arguing that resignation forfeited pension rights. The Supreme Court e

M/S. K.C.P. LTD.versusGOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS.

2015 INSC 56612 August 2015Dismissed

M/S K.C.P. Ltd., a producer of industrial (rectified) spirit, challenged the Andhra Pradesh Rectified Spirits Rules, 1971 which required licences, excise duty and various fees for export. The appellants argued that the State could not tax industrial alcohol, that the fees were not a quid pro quo, and that the export fe

STATE OF TAMIL NADU &ANR.versusTVL. SOUTH INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSN. & ORS.

2015 INSC 56712 August 2015Dismissed

The State of Tamil Nadu amended its Distillery Rules to raise the administrative service fee for industrial alcohol from Rs.0.50 to Rs.1 per bulk litre. The petitioners (industrial distilleries) challenged the increase, arguing that the fee must be based on a quid pro quo relationship between the State's expenses and t

KALYAN CHEMICALSversusGOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS

2015 INSC 56812 August 2015Dismissed After

Kalyan Chemicals, a manufacturer of ethyl acetate, challenged the Andhra Pradesh Government's amendment of Rule 3 of the 1971 Denatured Spirit Rules, which introduced an administrative fee of 50 paise per bulk litre and was given retrospective effect from 25‑10‑1989. The appellant argued that the amendment could not be

THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, TNHB & ANR.versusS. SARASWATHY & ORS.

2015 INSC 39611 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB) appealed against orders of the Madras High Court that had directed it to issue No Objection Certificates to purchasers of land that had been acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The land in question had been notified for acquisition under Section 4 and a declaration under S

UNION OF INDIA & ANRversusJAI KISHUN SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2014 INSC 61810 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a Freedom Fighter pension granted to the deceased respondent was improperly awarded, as he was only 7‑8 years old in 1942 and could not have participated in the freedom struggle. Documentary evidence, including a 1975 voter list and a 1977 deposition, showed his age to be about 42 in

BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2015 INSC 18510 March 2015Disposed off

The appellants, land owners, challenged acquisition proceedings originally under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and after the 2013 Act came into force, sought a declaration of lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Th

PREMIUM GLOBAL SECURITIES PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusSECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR.

2015 INSC 9049 December 2015Disposed off

Premium Global Securities Pvt. Ltd. (PGSL) transferred its National Stock Exchange (NSE) trading membership from its predecessor, Premium Capital Market & Investments Ltd. (PCMIL), after SEBI’s Rule 8(1)(f) and 8(3)(f) of the Securities Contract (Regulation) Rules, 1957 barred a company from carrying fund‑based and tra

SELVARAJ @ CHINNAPAIYANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2014 INSC 8469 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Selvaraj was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling his infant daughter, based on testimony of the mother, mother‑in‑law and a sister, who later turned hostile, and on a medical report that did not conclusively indicate homicide. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the hostile

SHER SINGH @ PARTAPAversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 219 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sher Singh, was convicted under Sections 3048 and 498A IPC for the alleged dowry‑related suicide of his wife, Harjinder Kaur, who had reportedly complained of dowry harassment two months before her death. The prosecution alleged that the husband and his family demanded a motorcycle and a fridge, leading

RATTAN SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2015 INSC 8968 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 applies to land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 when the award predates the 2013 Act by at least five years and either possession has not been

S.J. COKE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ETC.versusCENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD. ETC.

2015 INSC 2988 April 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered appeals by several coal traders (including S.J. Coke Industries) seeking a refund of excess amounts paid under a government‑mandated e‑auction scheme for coal, which had been declared ultra vires and void by the Court in the Ashoka Smokeless Coal case. The Central Coalfields Ltd. (CCL) oppo

MAYA DEVI & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 8927 December 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Maya Devi and others convicted under Sections 3048 and 498A of the IPC for the death of their daughter-in‑law, Kavita. The Court reiterated that to establish a dowry death, the prosecution must prove (i) death within seven years of marriage, (ii) death caused by burns, bodily in

E. BAPANAIAHversusSRI K.S. RAJU ETC.

2014 INSC 7657 November 2014Disposed off

E. Bapanaiah, a depositor, filed a contempt petition against K.S. Raju, promoter director of Nagarjuna Finance Ltd., alleging wilful breach of an undertaking given to the Company Law Board (CLB) to repay deposits. The High Court division bench set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by a single judge, finding Raj

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.versusNORTHERN INDIAN GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD.

2015 INSC 7457 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana acquired land in 1973 for a sheet‑glass factory and conveyed it to Northern Indian Glass Industries Ltd. (NIGI) under a deed that prohibited sale without the State’s written permission and required construction of the factory within a stipulated period. NIGI failed to build the plant, sold portions

STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.versusDEVANDER SAGAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 6477 September 2015Disposed off

The State of Haryana issued a Section 4 notification on 18‑Jan‑2001 to acquire land and invoked the urgency provisions of Section 17(1) and (4) without first tendering the statutorily required 80% compensation. A Section 6 declaration followed on 19‑Jan‑2001, but the land‑owners filed writ petitions challenging the not

LAXMI FIBRES LTD.versusAP. INDUSTRIAL DEV. CORPN. LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 5527 August 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Laxmi Fibres Ltd., a company under liquidation, challenging a condition imposed by the High Court that the Official Liquidator must adjudicate the claims of A.P. Industrial Development Corporation and A.P. State Financial Corporation, both secured creditors under Section 29 of

ABCversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2015 INSC 4826 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

An unwed Christian mother filed a petition under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, seeking to be appointed guardian of her five‑year‑old son. The Guardian Court dismissed the petition because the mother refused to disclose the name and address of the child’s putative father, holding that Section 11 requir

ZONAL GENERAL MANAGER, M/S IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD.versusM/S VINAY HEAVY EQUIPMENTS

2015 INSC 3826 May 2015Dismissed

IRCON International, the main contractor, entered into two sub‑contracts (C1 and C2) with Vinay Heavy Equipments for road work. The subcontractor completed about 67% of the work and claimed an unpaid balance of Rs 61 lakhs, leading to arbitration (First Arbitration) in which the arbitrator awarded the subcontractor rou

NEON LABORATORIES LTD.versusMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 7285 October 2015Dismissed

Neon Laboratories Ltd (appellant) sought to enforce its trademark ROFOL, for which it had applied in 1992 and obtained registration in 2001, but only began using the mark in 2004. Medical Technologies Ltd and its associate (respondents) had been using the similar mark PROFOL since 1998, having acquired goodwill in the

DIWAN SINGHversusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 35 January 2015Dismissed

The appellant, Diwan Singh, a cashier with Life Insurance Corporation of India, accepted Rs.533 from a policy holder on 13 August 1990 but failed to deposit the amount, later forging a ledger entry to conceal the shortfall. He was charged with temporary embezzlement and forgery, found guilty in a departmental enquiry,

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusPURUSHOTTAM

2015 INSC 25 January 2015Disposed off

The case concerned Havildar Purushottam, who was tried by a Summary Court Martial (SCM) for extortion and other misconduct, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to reduction in rank. The SCM proceedings were later set aside by a Deputy Judge‑Advocate General acting as a reviewing authority under Section 162 of the Army Ac

OPG SECURITIES PRIVATE LTD.versusS.E.B.I. & ANR.

2015 INSC 8884 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

OPG Securities Private Ltd, a stock broker, challenged SEBI's demand for registration fees calculated on the basis of its total turnover for periods after 1 October 2006. The demand was based on the earlier Schedule III of the SEBI (Stock‑brokers and Sub‑brokers) Regulations, which used the previous year's turnover on

VSE STOCK SERVICES LTD.versusS.E.B.I. &ANR.

2015 INSC 8274 November 2015Dismissed

The Vadodara Stock Exchange created a subsidiary limited by guarantee that could not obtain NSE membership, so it formed another stock‑limited subsidiary (the appellant) which secured NSE membership but was denied SEBI recognition because only one subsidiary could be registered as a broker. To operate on NSE, the earli

MINERAL EXPLORATION CORPORATION. LTD.versusARVIND KUMAR DIXIT AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 10363 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd, a government-owned public sector undertaking, faced severe financial losses and, under a government‑approved restructuring plan, announced a wage revision effective from 1 April 2003 and to be implemented from 1 April 2006. Employees who had voluntarily retired before 1 April 20

HASMUKHRAI V MEHTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 8283 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Hasmukhrai Mehta, owned land in Village Sheel, Raigad, which was originally included in a 1977 residential development plan. In 1999 the land was re‑designated for an Agricultural Produce Market Yard and a truck terminal, and the appellant served a purchase notice under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regi

S.E.B.I.versusALLIANCE FINSTOCK LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC.

2015 INSC 8233 November 2015Dismissed

The case concerned stock brokers who had converted their individual or partnership membership into a corporate entity before 1 April 1997 and sought the fee‑continuity benefit under paragraph 4 of Schedule III of the SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub‑Brokers) Regulations, 1992. SEBI denied the benefit, arguing that the provi

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusM/S. PREBON YAMANE (I) LTD.

2015 INSC 8223 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) appealed against the Securities Appellate Tribunal’s order directing SEBI to refund fees paid by M/s Prebon Yamane (India) Ltd (the Respondent). The dispute centered on whether the Respondent qualified for the "fee continuity" exemption under Clause 4 of Schedule III of

MOHAN SINGH & ORS.versusTHE CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD & ORS.

2015 INSC 5393 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were canteen workers at the Moradabad Division of the Northern Railway who claimed that their canteen should be treated as a statutory canteen under the Factories Act, 1948 and that their services should be regularised. The respondents argued that the canteen was a non‑statutory, non‑recognised facility

LAXMI DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 4783 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, land owners, challenged the State of Bihar’s acquisition of their land under the urgency provision of Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, alleging that no award had been made despite a High Court direction in 1988 to do so within four months. The State argued that Section 17 allowed possession

DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICERversusSYED ABDUL SALEEM AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 812 February 2015Dismissed

The Defence Estate Officer appealed against a High Court order that increased compensation for land acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 and awarded 30% solatium and 9% interest due to a 19‑year delay in appointing a statutory arbitrator. The respondents had originally been

RAJNI SANGHIversusWESTERN INDIAN STATE MOTORS LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 8741 December 2015Disposed off

The case involved four brothers who owned a family business and entered into an arbitration agreement in 1984 to partition the business. An arbitrator issued an award in 1987, but subsequent litigation in the Bombay, Rajasthan and Delhi High Courts resulted in family settlement schemes in 1994 and an amended settlement

BRANCH C.1.0., TIRUNELVELI RANGE, TAMILNADUversusMARIYAANTONVIJAY

2015 INSC 4631 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The police intercepted the vessel M.V. Seaman Guard Ohio within Indian territorial waters and seized a large quantity of unlicensed firearms and ammunition, leading to a charge sheet under the Arms Act, 1959 and other statutes. The accused challenged the charge sheet through revision (s.397) and a petition under the in

QUANTUM SECURITIES PVT. LTD. & OTHERSversusNEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD.

2015 INSC 4641 July 2015Disposed off

The plaintiff, New Delhi Television Ltd, filed a civil suit against Quantum Securities Pvt Ltd and others seeking a permanent injunction restraining defamatory communications and damages. During the suit, the plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion under Order XXXIX of the CPC and obtained an ex‑parte interim injunction on

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR.versusPANNALAL CHOUDHURY &ANR.

2015 INSC 4491 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The National Institute of Technology (NIT) dismissed its Registrar, Pannalal Choudhury, on grounds of financial and administrative irregularities after a departmental inquiry. The respondent challenged the dismissal, arguing that only the Board of Governors (BOG) had authority to dismiss under the Assam Services (Disci

PRADIP KUMAR MAITYversusCHINMOY KUMAR BHUNIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 3731 July 2013Dismissed

The appellant, a 60% hearing‑impaired candidate, secured the first merit for a Group ‘D’ non‑teaching post in a West Bengal school and was appointed, but the second‑ranked respondent challenged the appointment on the ground that the appellant had exceeded the prescribed upper age limit. The appellant claimed entitlemen

BHUPAL SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 2791 April 2015Case Partly allowed

The State of Haryana acquired large tracts of undeveloped agricultural land in 1977 for residential development, and the landowners sought compensation. The Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed the fair market value at Rs.16.52 per square yard, which was later enhanced to Rs.22 by the reference court. The High Cour

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search