Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS)

101 judgments · newest first · showing 1–101

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor after 1,260 litres were seized from a Tata 407 vehicle he owned. The petitioner argued that ownership of the vehicle alone did not prove his conscious possession or involvement in the offence and that the …

Solu Kumar @ Sonu Yadav @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Solu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 106.5 litres of liquor from a roadside location that does not belong to him. He was identified by a home guard, but the police did not seize any liquor from his possession at …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 55 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his possession and …

Sikandar ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikandar Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Sonu Sangahi @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Sangahi, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the death of his sister‑in‑law, the daughter of the informant, allegedly due to non‑fulfilment of a dowry demand for a Scorpio car. The petitioner argued that the dowry demand was made collectively by seven co‑accused and …

Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vivek Kumar filed an application fearing arrest in Complaint No. 855 of 2024, which alleged he had a physical relationship with Simran Kumari under various sections of the BNS. The prosecution claimed he misused a pretext of marriage, while the petitioner asserted his innocence and that he was …

Asha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Asha Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the death of an informant's sister, alleged to be a dowry‑related homicide under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner argued that the marriage between the deceased and her son had occurred nine years earlier, that …

Guddu @ Manish RajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu @ Manish Raj, the petitioner, feared arrest in a theft case (Alamganj P.S. Case No.617 of 2025) under Sections 334(1) and 305(a) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that three accused stole goods worth Rs.2 lakh from a utensil shop and, based on a co‑accused’s statement, searched the …

Chotelal Tanti @ Chhotelal TantiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chotelal Tanti, sought pre‑arrest bail in connection with a case arising from a Panchayat‑related dispute that allegedly led to assault on the informant’s wife and the snatching of a gold chain. The petitioner argued that the injury to the wife was simple, the dispute stemmed from a …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Dharupur village, sought relief fearing arrest in a case (No.152 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They alleged that the first petitioner, an Indian Army personnel, was implicated due …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Uday Kumar and Mukesh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 260 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. Mukesh Kumar was arrested while the application was pending, and his counsel sought to withdraw his anticipatory …

Gore Choudhary @ Gorelal ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gore Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …

Viccky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Viccky Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 32.280 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that no liquor was found …

Sunaina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are the mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the complainant, applied for bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑harassment case (Sections 498A IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act). They claimed that they had been granted protection under Section 41A CrPC during …

Vijay ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Vijay, Vinod and Rohit Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2024 police case alleging assault on an informant’s family under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. The prosecution alleged that Vijay caused grievous injury while Vinod and Rohit …

Nimod Kumar @ Nimod MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nimod Kumar and Sanoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Banjariya PS No. 625 of 2025) involving alleged assault, kidnapping, and other offences under the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the allegations against them were vague and that the principal …

Tribhuwan yadav @ Tribhuwan Ray @ Gibhuwan RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tribhuwan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40.60 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued he had no conscious possession, a clean antecedent, and …

Bittu SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 637.6 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He claimed the complaint was filed on the basis of a hostile chowkidar’s information and …

Ramchandra Sah @ Ram Chandra Sah @ Ramchandar SahuversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, a group of relatives from Belsandi village, were charged in a 2024 FIR for illegal construction on the informant's land and for assaulting the informant's family, including a specific allegation that petitioner No.1 assaulted the informant's husband with an iron rod. They applied …

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The High Court considered a pre‑arrest bail application filed by two accused, Vivek Kumar (21, a student) and Dhanji Singh (33), in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS for assaulting an informant and his family. The court found only minimal evidence …

Tulashi Kumar @ Tulashi RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Tulasi Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a public bush, not in his possession. He argued the allegation was based on secret information and that the location did not belong to …

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Vinay Kumar and Kundan Kumar were named in FIR No.257/2025 for offences including assault, outraging modesty and theft. They sought pre‑arrest bail, asserting that they were falsely implicated due to a personal enmity. The State opposed the bail. The High Court found specific allegations against …

Sagar Ali @ Saghar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sagar Ali, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 26 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in conscious possession of the liquor, and was merely the owner of the vehicle …

Pankaj SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pankaj Sahani feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 110 litres of liquor were recovered from his mother, Tetri Devi. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent and that the only evidence against him was his mother’s confessional statement …

Sajan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sajan Mahto and Rajan Mahto, were implicated in a case alleging recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a public area, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioners Pramod Kumar and Subodh Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the son and daughter‑in‑law of an informant with intent to kill, causing grievous injuries. They claimed innocence, clean antecedents, …

Kamlesh Verma @ Kamal Verma @ Kamlesh Prasad VermaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Kamlesh Verma and Anupam Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Goh PS Case No. 189 of 2025) where they were accused under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a fight broke out between two village groups, involving …

Jichho YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers named Jichho, Shravan and Dheeraj Yadav, were implicated in FIR No. 466 of 2025 for offences including assault, extortion of Rs.50,000 and theft of Rs.3,000, alleged to have occurred during a confrontation over the informant's illegal liquor shop. The petitioners …

Manisha Devi @ Manisha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manisha Devi and Mithun Sahni filed an anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 160 litres of liquor from a joint family house. Mithun Sahni was arrested while the application was pending, and his counsel sought to …

Umesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that his tractor was used to transport illegal sand from the Kiul river, violating Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner argued that the tractor was stationary, as shown by GPS data, for 24 hours on …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 694.2 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the motorcycles, and was …

Lalu Kumar @ Lalu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 10.35 litres of liquor were recovered from a sack he allegedly threw in an open field, with no possession or arrest at the spot. He argued that the recovery was …

Vidyanand SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vidyanand Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.5 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the case was …

Vivek SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vivek Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 375 ml of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a person named Kundan misused …

Chandra Bhshan Kumar @ Chadra bhushan kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandra Bhushan Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with an iron rod resulting in injuries to the informant, under several sections of the BNS. He claimed innocence, asserting that the dispute arose from a land conflict and that the injuries were simple in nature. The …

Kanhai Chaudhary @ Kanhai ChaudhriversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhai Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging concealment of 30 litres of liquor under straw in a public area. He claimed he was not caught in the act, that the alleged recovery was from a place not belonging to him, and that the …

Maheshwar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Maheshwar Mandal and his wife Amira Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land dispute that escalated into an assault, allegedly involving a bhala that caused head injuries to an informant and Shyam Mandal. The FIR charges them under multiple sections of the …

Chandrama Mahto @ Chandrama KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Koirgawa Bin Toli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of liquor from a distillery not owned by them. They contended that no liquor was found in their …

Jamshed Alam @ Md. Jamshed AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jamshed Alam and Md. Parvej Alam, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Amour PS Case No. 432/2025) involving serious offences such as attempt to murder and causing grievous hurt. The FIR alleged that they assaulted the informant and his family with intent to kill, arising from a …

Badal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Badal Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No. 491 of 2024) involving a stolen motorcycle. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement of co‑accused Rajnikant Kumar, who had already been granted regular bail, and no incriminating material was found in …

Baleshwar Mahto @ Vinod MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, six members of the Mahto family, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste-based slurs during a land dispute. They contended …

Kalika Devi @ Kukila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kalika Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle she owned was seized containing 1.5 litres of liquor, alleged to be a violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, that the seizure was made from a …

GUDDU KUMAR @ GUDDU MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and the …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rinku Devi, Kundan Nut and Suraj Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a pond adjacent to their house. They argued that the liquor was not in their conscious …

Radhika DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, five individuals including three women, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS) for alleged kidnapping and caste-based abuse of a minor girl. The informant claimed the …

Suchita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are related by family ties, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that they assaulted the informant in a land‑dispute. The petitioners submitted that the …

Barun Yadav @ Barun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Barun Yadav and Ranjeet Yadav applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the BNS for alleged extortion and assault causing grievous injuries. The FIR alleged that they demanded Rs 50,000 from the informant's husband and, upon refusal, assaulted him with intent to …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 17.280 litres of liquor concealed near his house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 277.125 litres of liquor from a Tata Safari vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle, asserting that the …

Dinesh Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case where police seized 27 Hiva trucks, including the one he owned (registration BR 11 GA‑9025), which was being driven by his driver. He claimed innocence, asserting he was not present at the incident and that the driver had a valid licence. …

Niranjan Yadav @ Niranjan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Niranjan Yadav, the owner of a Hiva truck, was implicated in an FIR alleging that 27 Hiva trucks were seized during a police patrol, with accusations of threats and attempted violence by the driver. Yadav claimed he was not present at the incident, that his driver was operating the truck with a …

Manibhushan PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manibhushan Pandey sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54.72 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the informant, a chowkidar, …

SURAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 4.125 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that a person …

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ranjeet Yadav and Masudan Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering five litres of liquor near the Andhera river. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the alleged …

Yugal Ray @ Yugal RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yugal Ray, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, …

Gopal Yadav @ Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), (c), (d), 33 and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 64.5 litres of liquor and 89 empty bottles from a bush near the Sone river. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, that the alleged liquor was …

Jagarnath Mahto @ Mangni MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jagarnath Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 13 litres of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard behind his house. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his immediate possession. The petitioner …

Deependra Passwan @ Deependra Kumar @ Dipendar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Deependra Passwan and Omprakash Majhi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Mairwa PS Case No. 434/2025) alleging assault on the informant’s son and the informant herself. They claimed innocence, alleging the FIR was filed due to a land dispute and that the injuries were minor. …

Nand Kishore RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nand Kishore Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued he had a clean antecedent, no possession of the liquor, and that the alleged recovery occurred on …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 56(b) and 62 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 28.5 litres of liquor from a house he does not own. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the …

Nikesh Ram @ Nikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nikesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor concealed under straw at a public location. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Shivakant PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivakant Pandey applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that he sold land beyond his share in a partition, invoking several sections of the B.N.S. The petitioner argued that the dispute is purely civil and that the appropriate remedy is a suit for cancellation of the sale …

Chanda ShrivastavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Chanda Shrivastav and Chintaharan Prasad Sinha sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Turkauliya PS Case No. 416 of 2025) that alleged offences under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(4), 61(2) and 308(4) of the BNS. They contended that the disputed land was not part …

Md. IrshadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Md. Irshad and his wife Kajal Khatoon sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 83 of 2025, which alleged offences under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS. The informant, who is the wife of the petitioners' brother’s wife, claimed the …

Mithlesh Ray @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mithlesh Ray and Hari Kishor Ray, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 337 of 2024) involving multiple offences under the BNS, including assault, robbery and rioting. The FIR alleged that they, along with others, entered the informant's house armed, …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession at the time of seizure, and is not the owner of the …

Indradev YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Datroul village, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged for multiple offences including assault and causing hurt under sections of the BNSS. They claimed they have clean antecedents (except one prior case for the third petitioner) and that the alleged …

Md. Noman Azad @ Mohammad Numan AzadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of ten individuals, were arrested in connection with an alleged assault on police personnel at Kumarkhand police station, arising from a land dispute between Md. Laddu and Md. Jabbar. The petitioners contend they were falsely implicated, that the police misbehaved, and that …

Rajesh PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Pandey sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that on 14 June 2025, after a firearm was discharged, Rajesh assaulted the informant's brother with a Gadasa, causing a …

MD. AKBAR @ AKBARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Jokihat P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, who are agnates of the informant, …

Gopal Sahni @ Gopal Sahni DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Gopal Sahni and Shubhkala Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl with intent to marry, under Sections 87 and 3(5) of the BNSS. They claimed innocence, stating they are the parents of the main accused, Sachin Kumar, and that the victim herself …

Sanjay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Sanjay Singh and Santosh Singh, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the BNS, 2023 for allegedly abusing and threatening an informant during a land dispute. The Special Judge had refused anticipatory bail, prompting the …

Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kishor Yadav, owner of one of three motorcycles from which 105 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Bipin Kumar @ Bipin BihariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and the allegation was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, did not own the …

Shani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shani Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 225.375 litres of liquor from a car and motorcycles. The petitioner argued he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicles, and the case was based solely on …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 7.5 litres of liquor near a Durga temple. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public land, and the case was based solely on a …

Rajendra Chaudhary @ Rajendra ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajendra Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 37 litres of liquor from a neighbour's paddy field and 1910 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor from land adjacent to his house, which was …

Chandan BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Bharti, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 968.76 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized …

Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 61 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware of any …

Irfan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Irfan Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related assault case (Mahila P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025) filed under Section 85 of the BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The …

Lalmuni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalmuni Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from her house, which is a joint family property. She argued she had no conscious possession, that the concept of deemed possession was …

Piyajo Dom @ Ajad KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Piyajo Dom @ Ajad Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor from a jute bag. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged location was not his …

Vivek Sharma @ Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vivek Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (PS Case No. 663 of 2024) where he was accused under Section 140(3) of the BNS, with additional charges under Sections 103(1) and 238. The prosecution alleged he killed his wife, while the petitioner claimed …

Omprakash Gupta @ Om PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Omprakash Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 165.630 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery site did not belong to him, and …

Munna Singh @ Munna Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Singh, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 3,335.4 litres of liquor, sought anticipatory bail claiming he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another accused made in …

Nandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Bhairopur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from land not belonging to them. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession and that the FIR did not …

Sudama DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudama Devi, the wife of Hitesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 15 litres of liquor, a country-made pistol and three live cartridges from her husband's house. The petitioner argued that she was not …

Vinod Yadav @ Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicle was merely owned by him, and that he was unaware of any misuse by a third …

Vikash RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Ram sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor was stored in a family property, and the 2018 amendment to the …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikram Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Saraiya Case No. 98 of 2022) under IPC sections 363, 366 and 34. The prosecution alleged that he abducted a girl, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated that she had voluntarily eloped with the petitioner. …

Deepu Pandey @ Subodh Kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepu Pandey, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 118(2), 109(1) and 303(2) of the BNS, alleging assault with a knife and robbery of Rs.12,000. He claimed innocence, a clean antecedent and that the matter had been compromised with the informant. …

Shushila Devi @ Shyamful DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 70‑year‑old woman suffering from asthma and joint pain, was arrested in connection with a murder arising out of a land dispute, alleged to have supplied cartridges used in the killing. She sought bail for offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 120.96 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Kanchan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kanchan Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 275 litres of liquor from a totorickshaw. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was merely …

Vijay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and a clean criminal record. The petitioner argued that ownership of the vehicle does not …

Ramakant PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramakant Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 15 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged recovery was made from persons apprehended by police, not from …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rekha Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Dinu Rai @ Arvind RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Sabalpur village, feared arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNSS) relating to alleged illegal sand mining and assault on police. They claimed they were falsely implicated, stating that the tractor involved belonged to …

Shaligram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shaligram Paswan and Nirdosh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from a public area, and …