Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022

1350 judgments · newest first · showing 1201–1350

Sourav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sourav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 230 litres of liquor from four sacks not in his possession. He argued he has a clean antecedent and the case is based …

Ghuran RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ghuran Ram, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 22.2 litres of liquor were recovered from a bush not belonging to him. He claimed the complaint was instigated by a hostile chawkidar and that he had no …

Uday Shankar Kuwar @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uday Shankar Kuwar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged illegal possession of liquor under Sections 292 and 111 of the BNS and Sections 30(a), 32, 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he has a clean …

Rahul YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 23.165 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested at …

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kavita Devi, a widow residing in Patna, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from her house. She contended that the liquor was located in a …

Anil Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 23.250 litres of liquor and seizure of …

Sharda DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sharda Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 11 litres of liquor, six litres of which were said to be recovered from her house. She argued that she has a clean …

Niraj Kumar Manjhi @ Neeraj Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean …

Jitendra Chaudhary @ Jitend chaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 106.20 litres of liquor were recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 1,950 litres of liquor from two motorcycles and a sack, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He asserted a clean criminal record, claimed he was not in …

Sonu Dewan @ Danish RajaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Dewan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, concerning the alleged recovery of 630 litres of liquor from a Scorpio. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the …

Asha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asha Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 133.5 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the …

Karu Yadav @ Ajay Yadav @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Karu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,500 litres of liquor from thirteen motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Indal Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, the …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged recovery of 720 litres of liquor was from a pit not belonging to him and that the only evidence against him was a …

Vinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinay Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 40 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles linked to him. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on …

Md. ShabbirversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Shabbir, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Budhan BhuiyanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Budhan Bhuiyan, a resident of Jharkhand, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 250 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the …

Mahip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahip Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle and an auto, faced arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 300 litres of liquor were recovered from those vehicles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 180 litres of a liquor-like substance. He was not arrested at the scene and no contraband was found in his possession; the allegation rests on …

Guddu Kamat @ Jay KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kamat applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 1,842.12 litres of liquor from a truck. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, was …

Ketu BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ketu Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned, implicating him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Raju Chaurasiya @ Raju Kumar ChaurasiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Chaurasiya, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 345.600 litres of liquor from a Bolero pick‑up. He contended that he was not arrested on …

Ramnath Sahani @ Ramanath SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramnath Sahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 300 litres of liquor and 800 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a river bank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no …

Ajay Mahto @ Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 35 litres of liquor and 40 litres of Jawa Mahua were recovered from a bamboo bush. He contended that he has …

Congress DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Congress Das, a resident of Dariyapur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 75 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that the vehicle was stolen, he had no …

Bablu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bablu Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …

Jay Prakash Sahani @ Andul SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jay Prakash Sahani and Bablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a bush not belonging to them and that they were not caught in possession. They …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 100.44 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the site did not belong to him, and that …

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Singh @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 1,364.250 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, did not own the …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rita Devi, a resident of Darbhanga, applied for anticipatory bail after the police sought to arrest her in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 16.875 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a …

Ram Niwas Rai @ Mukesh RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ram Niwas Rai (Petitioner 1) and Sharma Rai (Petitioner 2), filed anticipatory bail applications in a criminal case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. Petitioner 1, who had already been arrested, sought to withdraw his …

Rani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rani Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 12 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued that she was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in her …

Veena DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Veena Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 261 litres of liquor and two motorcycles. She …

Prahlad Kumar Singh @ Pramod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prahlad Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 31(1) and 31(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 5,385.12 litres of liquor from a truck and a car. He contended that he was …

Brjesh Kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brjesh Kumar Pandey, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged possession of 255.72 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a car he owned. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Santosh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 4 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession, the …

Dipu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered was not in his possession and the alleged site was public. He argued that the police relied on a chowkidar’s …

Swaminath MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Swaminath Mahto, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 340.050 litres of liquor were seized from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Sanjay MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Mandal, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of a large quantity of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Jitendra RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Ram, was implicated in a case for alleged possession of 18 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle, under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had no conscious possession, had a clean antecedent, and was …

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor and Mahua flowers were seized from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that the police relied on secret …

Upendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a public place near a railway crossing. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Gultesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gultesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of three litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his shop, not from his possession. He asserted a clean criminal …

Bullet YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bullet Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving the alleged recovery of 32.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor …

Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor and mahua seized were not in his possession and that he was falsely implicated by a …

Mukesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, did not have the scooty in his possession, …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,517.120 litres of liquor from a truck and two pick‑up vehicles. He contended that he was not in …

Dilip Prasad @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Prasad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 2,517.120 litres of liquor from a truck and two pick‑up vehicles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 400 ml of liquor was recovered from Chandan Kumar, who was found in possession of the petitioner’s motorcycle. The petitioner contended that he had no …

Intiya Devi @ Pratima Devi @ Itiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Intiya Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against her under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor. She argued that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, she had no conscious …

Vishal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated in the recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle despite having no prior criminal record and no possession of the …

Jatashankar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jatashankar Mukhiya, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did …

Chhabila NutversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhabila Nut, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for alleged possession of liquor recovered from two locations and his joint‑family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his immediate possession, the house is …

Purushottam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Purushottam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of five litres of codeine cough syrup. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no contraband …

Satendra Chaudhary @ Satan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Satendra Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where police alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he did not own. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Raju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his possession, and …

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Ghusiya Kala, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. An informant alleged that four to five intoxicated …

Shyam BabuversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shyam Babu, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public place and not in his possession. He argued that the police were mechanically …

Manjula DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjula Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from her house, which is a joint family property. She argued she …

Mithu Kumar @ Mithu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mithu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The allegation involved recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a location near Nayka Tola temple, …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 142.560 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized …

Shivpati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivpati Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, feared arrest after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor found near her hut. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from a …

Dadan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dadan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged offences under the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, the Arms Act, and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The FIR alleged recovery of liquor and cartridges, and that the accused fired …

Mukesh Rai @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Rai, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 5,257.065 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the …

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged seizure of 300 litres of liquor was from a premises not belonging to him and that he had no direct involvement. The …

Rampukar Sah @ Rampukar ShahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rampukar Sah sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 10 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and 25 litres from a house linked to him. The petitioner argued that he was not in …

Vivek Sharma @ Vivekanand SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vivek Sharma, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 114.48 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and a bag. He contended …

Satendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Satendra Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 7.4 litres of liquor from a public area in Videshi tola. He argued that the liquor was not in his …

Shushant Sharma @ Rabsan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shushant Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 36 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him. He argued that the only evidence against him was a …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar, the owner of a pick‑up vehicle, was implicated in a case (PS Case No‑154/2025) for the alleged recovery of 531 litres of liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, …

Kaushalaya Devi @ Sarita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kaushalaya Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of …

Baulal Kumar @ Babulal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Baulal Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and another 15 litres from the house of Lakhan Marandi. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 90.615 litres of liquor were recovered from a bamboo orchard belonging to Harendra Sahani, with no material found in the petitioner's possession. He …

Viral BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Viral Bhagat and Lagan Bhagat applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor. They contended that they have no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in their …

Shatrudhan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shatrudhan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 140 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

KARAN MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Manjhi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a bush near a river and from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Meghu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Meghu Paswan, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 8.94 litres of liquor from his house, a joint family property, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the liquor was not in his …

Raju Rai @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 33 and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 280 litres of spirit were recovered from a bush near his house but not from his possession. He argued that the …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him and that he was not arrested at the spot. He contended that the FIR did not …

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 33.57 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar, a resident of Jan Tola, Saran, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 92.73 litres of liquor from an auto, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …

Sanjit SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjit Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 45 litres of liquor were recovered from a paddy field adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Devanand Prasad Gupta @ D.P. GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devanand Prasad Gupta, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 77.760 litres of liquor recovered from his Tata Safari. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …

Chhotu Das @ Dhirendra DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotu Das, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from his shop and a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his …

Uttam Kumar Yadav @ Uttam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uttam Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 720 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, the recovery …

Ram Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ram Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 34 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 675 litres of liquor from a …

Sharwan Choudhary @ Sarwan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sharwan Choudhary was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 83.175 litres of liquor from his house, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was in a …

Pintu MusharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Mushar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 28 litres of liquor from a paddy field adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 650 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Ankit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 1,840 litres of …

Guddu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for alleged recovery of 351 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

Aditya Kumar @ Bambam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 100 ml of liquor was recovered from a house where he was a tenant, not the owner, and that no liquor was found in his …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 141 litres of liquor from a river bank, alleged offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued he has a clean antecedent, …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 150 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he was riding. He argued that he has a clean …

Shobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shobha Devi, a resident of Khagaria, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of five litres of liquor recovered from a spot adjacent to her house. The petitioner argued that …

Amarjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amarjeet Kumar, Rajbali Kumar and Manish Kumar, were arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 2,311.38 litres of liquor from several vehicles and charged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and the Arms Act. They applied for bail, contending they …

Sumangal Kumar Rai @ Shiv Mangal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumangal Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of over 5,200 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession …

Manu Singh @ Mannu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manu Singh, the petitioner, had been granted anticipatory bail by the Patna High Court in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, and was directed to surrender before the lower court within four weeks. He filed an application seeking an …

Bittu PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bittu Patel, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 8.640 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the …

TINKU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tinku Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …

Shiv ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 25 litres of liquor and 2 litres of spirit from his house in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint …

Vindeshwari Sardar @ Bindi SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vindeshwari Sardar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that …

NITESHWAR KUNVAR @ NITESHWAR KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Niteshwar Kunvar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of spirit from two motorcycles. He argued that he had no direct possession of the contraband, that he was unaware of his …

Jitendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jitendra and Dharmendra Paswan, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 70 litres of liquor at their joint family house. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the …

Chandan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Mahto, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 55 litres of liquor from a bush behind his house, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and the …

Karan Kumar @ Karan Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Karan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 25.935 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The liquor was recovered from a joint family house belonging to Chintu Kumar, and the …

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 132 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He alleged that liquor and a large sum of money …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 235.35 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned, under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent and claiming he …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated solely on the basis of confessional statements of co‑accused and that no liquor was recovered from his …

Paichu Bhuiyan @ Arvind Bhuiyan @ ArvindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Paichu Bhuiyan and Ramkesh Bhuiyan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from premises adjacent to petitioner 1’s poultry farm and from petitioner …

Sanjeet DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2,517.120 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested …

Chhotan TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotan Tiwari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 34.2 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Subodh Rai @ Mukesh Rai @ Subod RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner Subodh Rai sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of 60.300 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was …

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vikram Kumar and Rajdeo Chaudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 170 litres of liquor. Rajdeo Chaudhary was arrested while the application was pending, and …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anuj Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle from which 75 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that his friend misused the vehicle. He argued he had a clean criminal record and that the seizure was not from his conscious …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of …

Nandev Yadav @ Nand Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandev Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

MohitversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohit, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 3067.56 litres of liquor from a truck and three vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Sujit Kumar @ FaramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor not from his possession. He has six prior criminal cases, four under the Excise Act, and contended that the …

Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 432 litres of liquor from two vehicles he owned. He argued …

Chunchun Kumar Sah @ Chunchun SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chunchun Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in offences under the NDPS Act, Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, and the Arms Act. The allegations stemmed from a co-accused's confessional statement linking the petitioner to the supply of a gun used in …

Bhushan Kumar @ BhusiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhushan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after police recovered five litres of codeine‑containing cough syrup from his father’s residence. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …

Lalti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalti Devi, the owner of a scooty from which 20 litres of liquor were recovered, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended in 2022). She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 178.200 litres of liquor recovered from a hut that does not belong to him. He has seven prior criminal cases and was not arrested at the …

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a plastic bag. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the bag belonged to …

Sanjay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Singh, owner of two pickup vehicles, was implicated in a case alleging the seizure of 259.200 litres and 291.720 litres of liquor from his vehicles under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession …

Nand Kishore YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nand Kishore Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the BNSS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 639 litres of liquor from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that he …

Shahil Roy @ Sahil RayversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shahil Roy applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 201.75 litres of liquor from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the …

Murari Sah @ Murari Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Murari Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 2.520 litres of liquor from a shop run by his father. He argued that he had no direct involvement and that the only evidence against him was a …

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Pawan Kumar and Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 300 litres of liquor. They contended they were not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Sujeet YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sujeet Yadav, who has been in custody since 15 April 2025, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 109, 132 and 121(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The prosecution alleged that …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 41.6 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and …

Varisalal Yadav @ Baris Lal Yadav @ Vagis Lal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Varisalal Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 225 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, charging him under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He …

Manjeet Kumar @ Manjit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjeet Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 433.340 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Satyendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 405.36 litres of liquor from three vehicles he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Reshmi DeviversusThe State of BIhar

DISPOSED

Reshmi Devi and Gaurav Kumar, the wife and son of Pawan Sah, filed a petition fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 132, 121(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 37 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They argued that they have clean antecedents, were not …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 111.9 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Suraj Ram @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Ram, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 43.41 litres of liquor, 19.5 litres of beer and a motorcycle, offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(2) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was stored in a …

Sikinder MahtoversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikinder Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his meat shop, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the …

Golden KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Golden Kumar and his wife Puja Kumari applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 31.140 litres of liquor were recovered from their house and 25.500 litres from a Toto vehicle parked …

Santosh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 94 litres of liquor from a boat. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the boat, and had …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 58.1 litres of liquor from a government school corner. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession, …

Manoj ChaupalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Chaupal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 720 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, with charges under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …

Dinkar kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinkar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 6.84 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …