Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022

1350 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1200

Dhiraj Kumar @ Lala JiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 30.375 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no direct possession, the liquor was not found on his …

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Kavita Devi, a widow residing in a joint family house, faced arrest in a case alleging possession of 40 litres of liquor at her home and 16 litres at another house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She contended that she had no conscious …

Gaurav Kumar @ Gaurab KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 0.9 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware …

Abhay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a location near a pond. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …

MD. ABUL HEYATversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

MD Abul Heyat applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case arising from a stone‑pelting incident in Gaya where police recovered 375 ml of foreign liquor from a scooty. The FIR charges him under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and …

BASDEV MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Basdev Manjhi, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 235 liters of illicit liquor, 90 liters of which were recovered from his hut, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He had been in custody since 14 October 2025 and claimed innocence, …

Mahendra MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mahendra Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was not in possession of the seized liquor and was not the owner of the vehicle involved. The petitioner argued that …

Guddu Kamat @ Jay KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kamat sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from two vehicles. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and his implication …

Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He contended that he has a clean …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 60 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the offence under Section 30(a) of the …

Ranjit ShahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Shah, applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 17.28 litres of liquor from a bush and garbage. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found …

Ramesh Pasi @ Ramesh Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Pasi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from public areas with no direct possession. He argued that the alleged recovery occurred at locations not owned …

Raju ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor and a motorcycle from a brick kiln owned by …

Phuldeo ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Phuldeo Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from premises adjacent to his house but not from his possession. He argued …

Pappu Kumar Ray @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 42.720 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. He argued that no liquor was found in …

Jay Prakash SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jay Prakash Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 279, 337 and 338 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he …

Guddu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to his house. He has three prior criminal cases, two under the Excise Act, and contends that the …

Sikandar Yadav @ Sikendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sikandar Yadav and Durgesh Yadav, were implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly recovering 1,005.15 litres of liquor from a mango orchard and …

Archana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Archana Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, she had no conscious …

Amarjeet SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amarjeet Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 168.4 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no prior criminal …

Pankaj Kumar @ Ankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. …

Manoj ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 5 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he was riding. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was …

Rakesh Chaudhary @ Rakesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor was recovered from a shop he does not own and that he was not arrested at the scene. The petitioner argued that he had only one …

Ritesh KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ritesh Kamat and Lal Mukhiya, were implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, violating Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They applied for anticipatory bail, asserting they have clean …

Raja Kumar @ Raja ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …

Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, owner of a truck, was implicated in the recovery of 66 litres of liquor from his vehicle under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and that the driver and cleaner …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 131.34 litres of liquor in a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 50 litres of liquor in a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …

Premsagar Kumar @ Prem Sagar Kumar@ Premsagar Kumar MaliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Premsagar Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 468 litres of liquor near the Gandak river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …

Ravindra SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 41.4 litres of liquor from a garden not belonging to him. He argued he has a clean antecedent, no possession of the …

Abhinandan Yadav @ Abhinandan Kr.versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhinandan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 75.300 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him and that …

Babli BegumversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babli Begum, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 1.125 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she was not present at the spot of …

Anish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 211.68 litres of liquor from a Mahindra pickup vehicle registered in another person's name. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor or the vehicle at the time of seizure and that the investigation was …

Anjani Ram @ Saurabh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anjani Ram, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 42 litres of liquor from his TVS motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his …

Pradeep PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pradeep Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 240 litres of liquor from a public graveyard. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, the alleged …

Narad Kumar Sahani @ Narad KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Narad Kumar Sahani and Tufan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 150 …

Bablu ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bablu Chauhan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from locations not belonging to him. The petition relied on the claim that no liquor was found in his possession and the only …

Vikash OraonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Oraon applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that six litres of liquor were recovered from the courtyard of his joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious …

Amar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amar Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that 109.98 litres of liquor were recovered from a bush behind his house, implicating him under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …

Vinod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Yadav and Pramod Yadav were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 90 litres of liquor from the Sone Diyara area. The petitioners, who have prior excise cases (seven and five respectively), applied …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from his residence and another house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the property …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering four litres of liquor from a bush near his semi‑constructed house. The petitioner asserted that he has a …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 418.140 litres of liquor from a Bolero pick‑up. He contended that he was not in possession of the vehicle at the time of …

Sagar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sagar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 338, 336(3) and 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of …

Ravindra Kamat @ Ravindra Kumar KamatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravindra Kamat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 576 litres of liquor, charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he …

Srikant Sahani @ Shreekant ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Srikant Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the seized vehicle was not his, …

Mithilesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mithilesh Kumar Singh, the registered owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case where 8.640 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered near the vehicle during a police patrol. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the scene, nothing was seized from his possession, and that mere …

Dilip MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four residents of Newari Tola, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning illicit liquor recovered from a diyara area. The prosecution’s case relied on secret information and …

Anil ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Anil and Manoj Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Town P.S. No. 531 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 100 litres of toddy from their shop. The prosecution’s case is based on …

Bablu Nut @ Bablu NatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bablu Nut, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the seizure of 50 litres of illicit country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He claimed he was not present at the place of recovery, that the liquor was found in an …

Govind Kumar @ Govinda KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the recovery of 9 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a paddy field adjacent to a godown. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …

Nikhil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nikhil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 31.5 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle he owned in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, was not …

Shahbuddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shahbuddin Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after a police case alleged that 55 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from his motorcycle (Reg. No. BR28U-5856). He contended that he was unaware of the motorcycle's use by co‑accused Amarjeet Yadav and had no criminal …

Vikash Kumar Prasad @ Vikas Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging possession of 53.48 litres of foreign liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He contended that he had vacated the rented flat a month …

RAMNATH SAHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ramnath Sah, was implicated in a case (Riga P.S. Case No. 435 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, after a co‑accused claimed the illicit liquor recovered from a scooty was purchased from him. The petitioner …

Tunna Singh @ Tunna Kumar @ Tunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Tunna Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being named in a FIR alleging his involvement in the recovery of 90 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle, offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The prosecution claimed …

Pramod Kumar Yadav @ Pramod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Pramod Kumar Yadav was named in FIR No. 221 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 involving 72 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a motorcycle. The co-accused identified the petitioner, who denied ownership of the …

Sangita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sangita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the illegal manufacture of 15 litres of country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was …

Jagrita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jagrita Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from her residence, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She argued that she was not present at the location, the …

Tuntun Ray @ Tuntun RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Tuntun Ray, was named in an FIR for possession of 120 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from a motorcycle, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The co‑accused …

Shashi Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shashi Kumar Gupta and Munni Devi, owners of a motorcycle and a scooty, sought anticipatory bail after police seized 35 litres of spirit from the motorcycle in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. They contended that they had merely …

Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Arun Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Nagarnausa P.S. Case No. 275/2025) alleging possession of a country‑made pistol, live cartridges and 3 litres of illicit country‑made liquor. The FIR claimed the items were recovered from his residence. The petitioner …

Basanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Basanti Devi applied for anticipatory bail after police recovered 20 litres of Mahua wine from a room in a joint family house and alleged her involvement under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. She contended that the wine was not in her personal residence, that …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police, relying on secret information and local testimony, implicated him in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, for allegedly storing illicit liquor. The FIR alleged that liquor was recovered from a field …

Sahadev Paswan @ Sahdeo Paswan @ Sahadeo PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sahadev Paswan, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor and possession of a pistol, under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The prosecution alleged recovery of …

MANISH BHARTI @ MANISH KUMAR @ MANISH KUMAR BHARTIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manish Bharti, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 548 of 2025) for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, with 228 litres of liquor recovered from a tempo. He contended that …

Ajay KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar was implicated in a case alleging possession of 110 litres of illicit country-made chulai liquor recovered from a motorcycle, which he does not own. The prosecution’s case relied on the statements of a co-accused and an informant, with no direct evidence of Kumar’s conscious possession. …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Shikarganj P.S. Case No.48 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 132, 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, …

Jitendra Kumar @ Steel YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, fearing arrest in connection with PS Salaiya Case No. 55 of 2025. While the matter was pending, the petitioner was actually arrested. Counsel for the …

Rajesh Kumar Manjhi @ Rakesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Manjhi, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after 14 litres of illicit country-made wine was recovered from a bamboo clump near his house. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession …

Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Yadav was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 20.250 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was recovered from an open area behind his house, which he does not own, …

Rajesh KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kushwaha, was implicated in Excise Case No. 500 of 2025 for alleged offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, on the basis that a motorcycle he owned was used to transport 21 litres of liquor. He contended that he had merely lent the motorcycle to …

Raja Kumar @ Raja Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar Paswan, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 2,816.34 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a Hyva truck and alleged involvement of three persons attempting to flee. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the truck, was merely a passerby, …

Alok Gupta @ Alok Kumar Gupta @ Raja BabuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Alok Gupta, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Hathua P.S. Case No. 356 of 2025) for alleged possession of 22.6 liters of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The prosecution recovered the liquor from a …

Nasiban Kumar @ Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nasiban Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bypass PS No. 599 of 2025) alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 112 litres of …

Vikki SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vikki Singh, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 259.200 litres of foreign liquor in a Ford Figo, alleged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he was merely a hired driver, not the vehicle owner, and had no …

Chhotu Choudhary @ Chhotu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chhotu Choudhary was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of 100 litres of illicit toddy from his shop, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, had no possession of the toddy, no prior criminal …

Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anshu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that 25.080 litres of illicit foreign liquor were recovered from his scooty. He contended that he was merely the vehicle's owner, had no knowledge of the contraband, and that no liquor was actually seized from the vehicle. The petitioner …

Mithun Ram @ Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithun Ram, also known as Mithun Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after police alleged that he was involved in the sale of illicit liquor, leading to the seizure of 10 litres of country‑made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner …

Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mithun Kumar, feared arrest in a case (Sangrampur P.S. Case No.175 of 2025) alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for transporting 16.8 litres of country‑made liquor recovered from co‑accused Ankaj Kumar. He contended that …

Nitin Kumar @ Niteen KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026) involving alleged possession of 3602.16 litres of illicit liquor, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The prosecution …

Bharat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bharat Kumar was implicated in an excise case for possession of 9 litres of illicit foreign liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He sought anticipatory bail, contending that the seizure violated procedural requirements under Sections 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. and that his name was linked only …

Aman Kumar @ Rohan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Aman Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after police seized 334.5 litres of English liquor and alleged that the liquor belonged to him. The petitioner argued that …

Raghubir Kumar @ Raghuveer Kumar @ Raghuvir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raghubir Kumar feared arrest in connection with PS‑Runnisaidpur Case No. 16 of 2026, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 after police recovered 57.75 litres of whisky in a raid at an open field. He argued that he was falsely implicated, …

Vinay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinay Paswan sought anticipatory bail after police recovered 20 litres of illicit country-made liquor from his residence in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He argued that he was falsely implicated because the house is jointly owned …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Chandan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kankarbagh PS No.1074/2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, where 88 litres of illicit liquor were seized from an auto. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was being …

Madan Kumar @ Madan Murari @ Madan SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Madan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Minapur P.S. Case No. 335 of 2025) involving the alleged possession of 218.97 litres of illicit foreign liquor. The offence alleged was under Sections 329(3)(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar …

Pramod SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 30 litres of liquor were recovered from a location not belonging to him and that a hostile chowkidar implicated him. He argued …

Lokesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lokesh Kumar filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18‑10‑2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Kaimur, which was issued under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(3) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 180 litres of illicit liquor. The …

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged possession of 225 litres of liquor and two Scorpio vehicles. The prosecution alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, …

Md. Gauhar @ Md. GohearversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Gauhar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case arising from a stone‑pelting incident in Gaya where police were attacked and 18 persons were arrested. The FIR alleges offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section …

Mukesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mukesh Sahni and Ajay Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No‑219/2025) alleging violation of Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by them. The …

Karu Choudhary @ Rajendra ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Karu Choudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered from his under‑construction house was planted and that the case diary had not been produced. The …

Priyaranjan ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Priyaranjan Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 0.75 litres of liquor from a cowshed belonging to Subodh Choudhary. The petitioner …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar, a resident of Khokasaha in Samastipur, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 10.8 litres of liquor from a straw house not belonging to him. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the …

Karu ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Karu Chauhan sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) to 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor and fermented Mahua from land adjacent to his borewell, which he claims does not belong to him. He contended that …

Chandan Manjhi @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a bush not in his possession. He argued that the police implicated him mechanically based on …

Biranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Biranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 51.120 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. The petitioner's counsel admitted a mistake in the …

Pujan Yadav @ Shivpujan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pujan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 200 litres of spirit were allegedly recovered from a bush not belonging to him. He argued that the recovery was not from his conscious …

Jainath KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Jainath Kumar and Shyam Babu Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, …

Sumit Bharti @ Bhujangi SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sumit Bharti, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession and that the case was …

Gulshan Kumar Singh @ Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 60 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a sack near a canal, not in his possession. He argued that the recovery was …

Vishal Sah @ Vishal JayswalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Sah was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 30(a), 32(1)(3) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Laxman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 559.8 litres of liquor from a truck and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in …

Rajendra Sahni @ Rajendra Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajendra Sahni sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 108 litres of liquor from a bush near a sugarcane field. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …

Raghu Nandan Ray @ Gop RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raghu Nandan Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from locations not in his immediate possession. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …

Phulbabu Kumar @ Ful Babu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Phulbabu Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS‑46/2025) for alleged possession of 186.06 litres of liquor recovered from four motorcycles and jute sacks, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he had a …

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR SAHversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 25.875 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Sri Nitish Kumar @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 228.885 litres of liquor from a middle school premises. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his …

Bittu Sah @ Bitu SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 531 litres of liquor were recovered from a pickup vehicle he was driving, though he claimed no ownership or conscious possession and a clean antecedent. The …

Akshay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akshay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging he was involved in the recovery of 56.7 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard that does not belong to him. The petitioner claimed a clean …

Rajan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the seized liquor, and was implicated …

Rakesh GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 138.04 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. He claimed he was not in possession of the seized items, was not the …

Manju Kunwar @ Manju KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Kunwar, a widow, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from her joint family house and a nearby bush. She contended that she was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …

Shard Singh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shard Singh Yadav, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 62 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Sanjay ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from his house and related premises. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was …

Arvind Paswan @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Paswan sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 113.70 litres of liquor in his cowshed. He argued that the liquor was not in his immediate possession, the cowshed was …

SANNI KUMAR RAYversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that no liquor was found in his personal possession, the …

Indrajeet SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Indrajeet Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 71.28 litres of liquor from a public place and asserting that nothing was found in his possession. He highlighted his …

Dashai MusaharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dashai Musahar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that liquor recovered from his joint family house was not in his conscious possession and that he was implicated by an inimical watchman. …

Rajkishor Yadav @ Rajkishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajkishor Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 30 litres of liquor were recovered from a location not belonging to him and that he was implicated by a hostile chowkidar. …

Prema DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Utara village, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS‑Case No. 372 of 2025) alleging that 8.6 litres of liquor were recovered from their jointly‑owned house, contravening Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …

Chhathu Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Kalalu @ KalluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhathu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered was from premises unrelated to him and that a confessional statement obtained in police custody lacked …

Santosh Kumar @ MalluversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, a resident of Pakari village, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS. Case No.242/2025) alleging that 53 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle linked to him, invoking Section 317(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …

AshirwadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashirwad Ojha, a restaurant owner, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(e) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 15 ml of liquor and three empty bottles recovered from his premises. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the …

Sanjeet RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor seized from a ditch did not belong to him and that he was implicated solely on secret information without proper investigation. He argued that …

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 37 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 2.235 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and another motorcycle was seized. Although the liquor was not found in his possession and …

MANOJ SAHANI @ MANOJ KUMAR @ BIRODHI SAHANIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sahani applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging recovery of 160 litres of liquor, offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …

Manohar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manohar Rai filed a writ petition seeking the release of his truck, seized by Siwan Excise officials in connection with the recovery of 820,800 litres of illicit foreign liquor. The seizure was made under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 against …

Satyendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, relating to the alleged recovery of 1,840 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He argued that …

Upendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Upendra Singh, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 390 litres of liquor were recovered from motorcycles and a bag linked to him. He argued that he was not in …

Arjun Chaudhary @ Arun ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where three litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is a …

Guddu Kumar @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of over 3,200 litres of liquor from vehicles linked to him. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized …

Ranju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ranju Devi applied for anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 300 litres of Jawa Mahua solution from her residence. She contended that she was …

Bulet Yadav @ Bulat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Bulat Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 65.820 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vehicle he did not own. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …

Satan Mukhiya @ Santan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Satan Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 7 litres of liquor recovered from a paddy field and his house. He argued that the liquor was found in a …

Ramakant MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramakant Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 50 litres of liquor were recovered from a sack not in his possession and that he has a clean antecedent. The prosecution opposed the …

Chunnu Paswan @ Chunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chunnu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 113.70 litres of liquor from a cattle shed belonging to another person. He argued that he had …

Lalpari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalpari Devi and Nelu Devi, wives of Anil and Sunil Sahni, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from their joint family house. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing they …

Amresh Kumar Yadav @ Amresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amresh Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 274, 275(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the liquor seized …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 46 litres of liquor were recovered from a bush adjacent to his field, with no possession or arrest at the spot. He argued that the police mechanically …

Vimal Devi @ Vimla DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vimal Devi, Kundan Kumar and Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of …

Apsana KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Apsana Khatun, sought anticipatory bail after a seizure of 15,600 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned, alleging she was unaware of her friend's misuse of the vehicle and had no possession of the liquor. The State opposed the bail, citing offences under Sections 30(a), …

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 46 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his field. He argued that he was not in possession, the alleged liquor was …

Rahul Kumar SafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar Safi applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated based on a police‑custody confessional statement of another person and that no liquor was recovered from his possession. …

Shiv Kumar SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Kumar Sardar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 75 litres of liquor were recovered from a straw house on his premises. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …

Manji Kumar @ Manji SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manji Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 92.8 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the …

Akash Yadav @ Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that he was implicated based on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody and that no liquor was recovered from his …

Lala SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Lala Sahni and Shankar Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to them. They argued they have a clean criminal …

Karu Miyan @ Sahjad AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Karu Miyan sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 85 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of Mahua jaggery from a bamboo orchard not owned by him. He asserted a clean antecedent and …

Shivshankar Chouhan @ Shivshankar Kumar Chouhan @ SangiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shivshankar Chouhan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, …

Barun Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Barun Kumar Singh, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 240 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and …

Kalendra Chaudhary @ Kirandar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kalendra Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his house, which is part of a joint‑family property. He contended that no liquor was found in his conscious possession, that …

Jai Ram MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Harlochanpur, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 126, 115(2), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 127(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging involvement in the …

Vinod PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Vinod Paswan and Avishek Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They contended that the only evidence against them was a …

AJAY @ AJAY SAO @ GARAI SAO @ AJAY KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the liquor recovered from his joint family house was not in his conscious possession and that the concept of deemed possession …

Arvind Chaudhari @ Arvind ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arvind Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Amresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amresh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 30 litres of liquor and a mobile phone were recovered from a motorcycle allegedly linked to him. He contended …

Lalu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 448.980 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and claimed that the liquor was not in his …

Binod Sahani @ Vinod SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Muzaffarpur, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning alleged recovery of liquor and Mahua Jaggery solution that was destroyed in a river. They argued that no …

Shri Krishna Mahto @ Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shri Krishna Mahto applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He has seven prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 494.64 litres of liquor from a co‑accused’s straw house, but he was not arrested at the scene and no …

Dhanu Mahto @ Dhane Mahto @ Dhanjee MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhanu Mahto, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He has three prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house, but no liquor was found in his …

Vikash Kumar @ GuddiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 59,400 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from land not owned by him. He argued that nothing was found in his …

Sonu Jha @ Sonu Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Sonu Jha and Sudhir Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged possession of 200 ml of liquor, 500 ml of beer, and three empty cartridges. The allegations were based on confessional statements made by co-accused persons while in police …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar was accused of an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor near the Ganga River. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated …

Mukesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from his jointly owned house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …

Sri Shashi @ Shashi Bhushan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shashi Bhushan Singh applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 750 ml of liquor was recovered from a guardroom in DRCC premises. The allegation is based solely on a …

Gautam Kumar @ Bolbam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 2 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession …

Bhutta SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhutta Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 80 litres of liquor and a motorcycle were seized. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the seized items were not in his possession, and …

Sudhir SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhir Sahni applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 80 litres of liquor from a motorcycle that was not in his possession. The petitioner argued that the police had mechanically …

Nitish Kumar @ Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 17.250 litres of liquor recovered from an auto. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …

LalaramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalaram, the owner of a vehicle rented to Zoom Car Service, was implicated in the recovery of 285.495 litres of liquor from his car and faced charges under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that …

Rajesh Manjhi @ Nakul Manjhi @ Rajesh SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged recovery of 240.87 litres of liquor from an auto, with charges under Sections 318(4), 303(2), 317(5) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar …

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Yadav @ DhisnaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 210.6 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from four vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession …

Vijay Ray @ Vijay Kumar Ray @ Barku RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from locations adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and …

Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ajit Kumar and Vijay Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging the recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and a scooty. They contended …

Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar @ Abhimanyu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He has five prior criminal cases, four relating to excise, and contends that his implication is based solely on a …

Jhuna Yadav @ Jhunna Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jhuna Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 414.72 litres of liquor from a location near the Soti River. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …

Chandrashekhar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of ten litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor …

Chandan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a)(b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor and Jawa Mahua from a riverbank. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

Ravan Manjhi @ Ram PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 832 litres of spirit from his dalan. He argued that the alleged seizure was not from his immediate possession, the dalan …

Pinkesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pinkesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 44.49 litres of liquor from a bush near Ranveer Jha's house. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, no …

NITESH YADAV @ NITISH KUMAR @ NITESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 25.92 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his …

Manoj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging that 83.07 litres of liquor were recovered from his Mahindra XUV‑500. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …

Ranjay @ Ranjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 85 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution. He argued that he has a clean …

Deewan Kumar @ Deewan RajvanshiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Deewan Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging he was involved in the recovery of 85 litres of liquor and 1,000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution. The petitioner argued that he was …

Dhanesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 7 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint‑family house, he had no conscious possession, and …

Shyam YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shyam Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging he was involved in the recovery of 190 litres of liquor from a public cremation ghat. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …

Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 1,28,000 hemp balls were allegedly recovered from an auto and a scooty. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Alok Yadav @ Alok Kumar Yadav @ Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Alok Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 106 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's …

Manish Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar Ray applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 170 litres of spirit and 2 litres of spurious liquor from the house of Sachin …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for the alleged recovery of 34.56 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …

Vilash RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vilash Ray, feared arrest in a case alleging that 27 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar, a resident of Daulatganj, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, concerning the alleged recovery of …

Sonu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 140 litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor and that the …

Anand Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anand Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 1.98 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in …

Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 25 litres of liquor were recovered from his under‑construction house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …