CHELLAMMAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 54022 April 2025Disposed off
The appellants, a mother‑in‑law and her son‑in‑law, were convicted under Section 498‑A of the IPC for cruelty to a woman and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and fine. They sought to replace the imprisonment with an enhanced fine, but the court held that fine cannot substitute imprisonment under Section 498‑A. The pr…
K. PRABHAKAR HEGDEversusBANK OF BARODA
2025 INSC 99719 August 2025Disposed off
K. Prabhakar Hegde, a former officer of Vijaya Bank (later merged with Bank of Baroda), was dismissed after disciplinary proceedings for alleged irregularities in approving temporary overdrafts. He challenged the denial of the preliminary inquiry report, the failure of the Inquiry Officer to generally question him as r…
OM PRAKASH YADAVversusNIRANJAN KUMAR UPADHYAY & ORS.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 77713 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant lodged an FIR alleging that his brother was murdered in Firozabad and that a separate FIR was falsely registered in Gwalior to provide an alibi for the main accused. The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against several police officials, holding that sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC was re…
SHENTO VARGHESEversusJULFIKAR HUSEN & ORS.
2024 INSC 40713 May 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a deliveryman, complained that gold bars received in exchange for gold chains were counterfeit, leading the police to freeze the accused's bank accounts. The police reported the seizure to the jurisdictional magistrate only after a delay, and the Madras High Court ordered de‑freezing on the ground that t…
JAMIN & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 3306 March 2025Dismissed
The appellants Jamin and Akil were summoned as accused under Section 319 of the CrPC after the original murder trial had concluded and the co‑accused were convicted. They challenged the summoning order, arguing that the trial court could not entertain a Section 319 application after the trial and that the High Court ha…
SHARIF AHMED AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 3631 May 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined three criminal appeals arising from chargesheets filed in Uttar Pradesh that were alleged to lack sufficient factual detail and evidence under Section 173(2) of the CrPC. It considered whether a chargesheet must contain detailed facts and material evidence to enable a magistrate to take cogni…