Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 9601–9800
The applicants, Nanhey and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code against the State of U.P. and another party. No counsel or parties appeared on behalf of the applicants. The court, presided over by Justice Avnish Saxena, noted the non-appearance and ordered that …
The applicants, Vijesh Vohra and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 22‑05‑2024 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Case No. 3669 of 2024) for offences under IPC sections 452, 354(B), 323, 504 and 506. The parties had already reached a …
The applicant Pooja Singh filed a criminal complaint alleging dowry demand of Rs.3 lakh, physical and mental cruelty, and assault by her husband Vipin Kumar and his family. The trial court dismissed the complaint and acquitted the accused, noting lack of medical evidence, contradictory statements …
Lakhan Singh, a resident of Bhathachak village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that he assaulted an informant with a lathi, causing only simple injuries. The petitioner highlighted his clean …
The petitioners, six residents of Deora Takiya, were charged under IPC sections 147, 149, 307, 448, 504 and 506 for allegedly entering the informant’s house armed and assaulting him and his family. They contended that the incident arose from a quarrel between the children of the two families, …
The petitioner, Kyamuddin, was charged in a 2022 case for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 302 and Arms Act section 27, stemming from an alleged armed attack that resulted in the death of an informant's husband. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and that his alleged …
Vishal Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 116 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 103(1) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that Sahani participated in a scuffle and that a …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, alleging that the alleged liquor and Mahua Jaggery solution were not recovered from his possession. He has two prior excise …
The petitioner, Deonandan Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2010 case involving the illegal manufacture and possession of desi mahua liquor, charged under Sections 269, 270, 271, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Excise Act. He had previously been released on bail in …
The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a 2019 case alleging possession of 63 litres of liquor, charged under IPC sections 188, 272, 34 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act sections 30, 38, 41. An earlier application for anticipatory bail had been rejected. The petitioner …
Mohan Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged seizure of 630 litres of liquor and two motorcycles, with offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the …
Petitioner Brahamdeo Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged recovery of 95 litres of liquor and 60 litres of Nepali diesel from a pickup van, charged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, several IPC provisions and the Essential Commodities Act. The petitioner …
Ram Awatar Yadav appealed against the trial court's refusal to grant bail in a case where he was charged under IPC sections 302, 504 and 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the alleged murder of a 12‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleged that Yadav, his son and two others assaulted …
The petitioner, Neetu Kumari, sought quashing of a cognizance order dated 04‑03‑2020 in a kidnapping‑for‑ransom case (IPC s.364A read with s.34) filed against her and others. The FIR, originally lodged against unknown persons for kidnapping (IPC s.363, s.365), was later linked to the petitioner …
The petitioner, Shyam Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 16 May 2016 of the 2nd Class Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 03-04-2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 323, 448, 379, 504 and 506 of the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Thakur, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a 2016 order of a Judicial Magistrate that had taken cognizance of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that he …
The petitioners Kamlesh Singh and Gita Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19‑04‑2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 376, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and summoned them to …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a 25 July 2018 order of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate‑XII, Mahua, which had rejected his petition to be discharged under several IPC offences. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 01‑09‑2018 that had framed an additional charge of Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code against him. The petitioner argued that the underlying trial (Sessions …
The appellants Suresh, Heera and Sevalal Choudhary were convicted for assaulting Yogeshwar Dhanuk with a fasuli, resulting in multiple injuries, under IPC sections 326 and 307/34. The prosecution relied on six eye‑witnesses, an injured witness, a medical doctor’s report and the investigating …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 05-11-2018 in which the Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar, refused to discharge them from charges under IPC sections 363, 366(a), 376, 504/34 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The petition was filed after the underlying criminal case had already been …
The appellants, Raj Kumar Singh and Ram Kumar Singh, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, for assault (IPC 323), criminal intimidation (IPC 504) and, in the case of the first appellant, outraging the modesty of a woman (IPC 354). The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony …
The petitioners, Rajeev Kumar Tamboli, Shyam Prasad Tamboli and Bachchi Devi, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 26 June 2018 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in complaint case No. 2754 of 2017. The order had taken cognizance of …
The petitioner, Umesh Prasad Jaiswal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 19 September 2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Explosive …
The petitioner, Ghutar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 11 September 2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 341, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The status …
The petitioner, Ali Reza, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 15-12-2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341, 353, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged extortion, rioting, murder, theft, conspiracy and unlawful possession of arms, as per Sections 147, 341, 386, 302, 379, 120(B), 504 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that co‑accused Kamli …
Vijay Kumar Singh, a builder, entered into a development agreement with landowner Surendra Kumar Singh and was later accused of fraud, leading to an FIR under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The parties subsequently reached a voluntary compromise, filing a joint affidavit stating that …
The petitioners – the mother‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the complainant – filed an application to quash the order dated 10‑Oct‑2022 that took cognizance against them under Sections 341, 323, 354, 427, 498A, 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19-07-2017 that had taken cognizance against them under Sections 307, 385, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The order being challenged was issued by the …
The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, was charged in a 2022 case for murder, concealment of dead body, rape and criminal conspiracy under Sections 302, 201, 376 and 34 of the IPC, as well as offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in the …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 188, 290, 414 and 120B and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the seizure of 587.52 litres of liquor, part of which was recovered from his motorcycle and car. He argued that he …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he, along with co‑accused, inflicted knife wounds on Rohit Kumar. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that the alleged principal …
The petitioner, Daya Shankar Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Buxar Mahila Police Station (Case No. 65 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 354(B), 323, 506, 509/34 of the IPC and Sections 8, 10 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that on 19 November …
The appellant, Jitendra Chaudhary, was charged under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and attempting to outrage the modesty of Urmila Devi and her family, including pouring acid on the husband. The appellant contended that he was falsely …
The petitioner, an engineer employed at Tata Steel, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 168 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 506, 376, 312 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed the FIR was malicious, filed after …
The petitioner, charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 376, 504 and 506 for alleged false promise of marriage, pregnancy, and related offences, applied for regular bail. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had a physical relationship with the informant, she became pregnant, and he refused to …
The petitioner, Gorelal Ramani, sought bail in a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) for which he has been in custody since 19 June 2024. He argued that he was never named in the FIR and that no substantive evidence links him to the crime, citing that a co-accused was previously granted bail. The …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was arrested on 28 March 2025 in connection with a murder case (Section 302/34 IPC) arising from FIR dated 18 May 2023. He contended that the FIR was fabricated, he has a clean antecedent, and the informant is his aunt, asserting that no substantive evidence links him …
Kaushal Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 302, 304(B), 120(B) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the alleged torture and killing of his wife. He had been in custody since August 2024 and was granted regular bail on 4 September 2025 subject to the condition that the …
Lalan Yadav was arrested on 9 June 2025 in connection with a 2013 case involving a blast that resulted in deaths. He is charged under multiple provisions of the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act, CLA Act, UAPA and the PDPP Act. The prosecution’s case rests on the informant’s testimony and the …
The petitioner, Jawala Prasad, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. His earlier bail application had been rejected on 15 September 2025. He filed a new bail application within six months of the rejection. The Patna High Court held that the new application …
Sonu Kumar was arrested on 3 April 2024 in connection with a case (PS Kotwali, case No. 349 of 2023) involving alleged murder, attempt to murder and possession of arms. The prosecution alleged that the accused opened fire on the informant’s father and brother, resulting in death and injury, and …
The petitioner, Umesh Pathak, sought regular bail in a case where his son, Rupesh Kumar Pathak, was alleged to have defrauded an informant of about Rs. 42 lakh and issued bounced cheques, invoking Sections 406, 420, 120B of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner …
Ramdhar and Upendra Choudhary were arrested in connection with a 2019 murder case (IPC s.396) and offences under the Arms Act (ss.25(1‑b)a, 26, 35). They have been in custody since August 2025 and filed a bail petition, claiming they were not named in the FIR and were implicated only through …
The petitioner, Chandan Chand, was arrested on 6 June 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged assault with electric shock that resulted in the victim's death, and is charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code including murder and attempt to murder. He contended that he was …
Petitioner Raj Lal Yadav was arrested on 4 September 2025 in connection with a 2015 case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 379, 323, 324, 307, 447 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have assaulted the son of an informant with a bhala during a land dispute. The petitioner claimed …
Nitish Kumar was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder that occurred in Madhuban. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that no witness had yet been examined. The court noted that the petitioner had given a self‑incriminating …
The petitioner, Abhinav Kumar, was arrested on 18 March 2025 in connection with a case registered under Sections 394 and 307 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and that his alleged involvement was based solely on a confessional statement of a …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Singh Rana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of FIR No. 107 of 2017, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 149, 353, 420, 504, 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR had already been …
Deepak Mishra was arrested on 18‑12‑2024 in connection with a dowry‑death case (IPC 304B, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act 3,4) alleging his involvement in the killing of the informant's daughter. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, that the allegations were fabricated, and that the …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Kumar, was charged with kidnapping and murdering a six‑year‑old child under Sections 363, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He has been in custody since 29 April 2024 and the charges have been formally framed. The petitioner filed a second application for regular …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Rai, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife. His earlier bail application had been rejected in November 2024. The petitioner argued innocence, that only charges had been framed, and …
The petitioner, Bhim Bali, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged illegal possession of 10 litres of liquor and offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that liquor was recovered from a plastic …
Amarnath Kumar, accused of offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 336, 504 and 506 of the IPC, has been in custody since 11 September 2025. The prosecution alleges that he, as a partner of Mahadeo Enterprises, misused a blank cheque, obtained a loan of Rs.15 lakh, and misappropriated …
The petitioner, Rahul Sahani, was charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of illicit liquor recovered from a public chawar. He had been in custody since May 1, 2025, and charges were formally framed …
The petitioners, Shiv Shankar Singh and Arjun Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 308/34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (sections 30(a), 38(i), 41(i)). They contended that the liquor (129,600 litres) was recovered from a …
Petitioner Pradeep Kumar, a former Panchayat Sachiv, was implicated in a case alleging withdrawal of Rs. 42,000 from a government fund, attracting charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 406 and 409. He asserted his innocence, highlighted his superannuation and clean record, and offered to …
The petitioners, Fulwa Devi and Kanti Devi, are sister‑in‑laws of a woman who was allegedly murdered by her in‑laws on 16‑03‑2024. The prosecution’s case, based on an informant’s testimony, registers a charge of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners, …
Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of 2,660.025 litres of liquor from a truck and charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, as well as sections 30(a), 30(i)(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Sahani, was arrested in connection with a POCSO case (Kanti PS Case No. 351 of 2018) and charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 366A and 504/34. He sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR was fabricated. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kapar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302 and 34) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that co‑accused Shiv Kumar fired the fatal shot, while the petitioner was present as a member of the unlawful assembly but did …
The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, was charged under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly being involved in the recovery of 697.32 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He has seven prior cases, five under the Excise Act, and claims he was not arrested at the …
Nunuram Das was arrested on 29-10-2025 in connection with a 2020 FIR alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He pleaded that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR contains only a generic allegation against all accused, with no specific act …
The petitioner, Ankesh Kumar Singh, obtained anticipatory bail on 5 January 2018 in a case under Section 387 IPC and submitted his bail bond on 23 January 2018. Despite this, a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) was issued against him on 30 May 2018, leading to his arrest on 30 July 2018 and release on 31 …
The petitioner, Deepak Sahani, was charged under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 290 litres of liquor and 8,000 litres of raw material from a riverbank. He contended that he has a clean record, that the seized …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar Mandal, was arrested on 8 October 2025 in connection with a land‑dispute incident that led to charges under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted the informant’s brother with a spade during a quarrel, …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested on 5 August 2025 in connection with a 2021 FIR alleging assault with the butt of a pistol and theft of Rs. 52,000 and a mobile, offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution claims he and co‑accused committed the …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 392 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that his trial had progressed very slowly, with only one prosecution witness examined after more than a year in custody, …
Ankur Kumar Sharma was arrested on 19‑08‑2025 in connection with PS‑941/2023 for alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant using weapons, but the petitioner's counsel argued that the FIR contains no …
The petitioner, Rakesh Yadav, was arrested on 25 July 2025 in connection with a FIR dated 28 May 2024 alleging rape of his own daughter and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 376 and 506. The prosecution contended that the petitioner had committed the offences, while the petitioner claimed he …
Aakash Kumar was arrested on 24 September 2025 in connection with a murder case (IPC 302 read with 34) arising from FIR dated 13 June 2021. He applied for bail, contending that the FIR contains only a generic allegation against all accused and does not specifically charge him with any assault or …
The petitioner, Khushboo Parween, filed an application seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to Akram Khan (Opposite Party No.2) in a case involving offences under IPC sections 302, 307, 326, 120B, 34 and Arms Act section 27. The grounds alleged were that the accused had threatened the …
Petitioner Baban Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with alleged offences under IPC Sections 414, 272, 273 and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the seizure of 3,780.72 litres of liquor from a truck and a car he owned. He argued that he had a …
Archana Kumari was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code, with additional charges of Sections 302, 201, 120(b) and 34 later added. She has been in custody since 7 May 2024 and a prior application for regular bail was rejected, with the …
Petitioner Rajeev Das was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged possession of a country‑made pistol and live cartridges, charged under IPC sections 412 and 34 and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied on the recovery of the weapon from co‑accused and their …
The petitioner, Birendra Chauhan, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder case (Sessions Trial No. 483 of 2024). He had been in judicial custody since 13 December 2023 and previously applied for regular bail, which the Patna High Court rejected on 7 July 2025, …
Harendra Ray was arrested in connection with the seizure of 220 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a), (c), (d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 414 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the …
The Patna High Court heard applications for regular bail and anticipatory bail filed by several accused in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 368 of 2023) involving offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in the kidnapping of a minor girl along …
The petitioner, Umashankar Singh, filed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to Vishwas Mali (Opposite Party No.2) on 06-12-2023. The petitioner alleged that Mali obtained bail by misrepresenting that no incriminating property had been recovered, whereas the case diary showed …
The petitioner, Vikky Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Sugauli PS Case No. 263 of 2024) under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code. The alleged crime involved multiple accused persons stabbing a victim, binding him, and looting his mobile phone, cash, and a watch, …
Vijay Kumar Choudhary applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC relating to alleged misappropriation of funds and a performance guarantee. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner received cash and bank transfers for a contract work, executed an …
The petitioner, Lal Babu Ram, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery and assault. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals injured an informant and looted two mobile phones, one of which was recovered from the …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 05‑07‑2017 passed by the learned CJM, Begusarai, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 494 and 498A of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The underlying criminal case …
Petitioners Rajiv Kumar Agrawal and Anirudh Agrawal filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 04-07-2015 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The petition argued that the underlying criminal case (Begusarai Town PS Case No.305 of 2014) …
The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 05‑08‑2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, which had taken cognizance of a complaint against them under Sections 147 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Sinha, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 31 March 2017, wherein a Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 504 and 417 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the criminal case …
The petitioner, Pramod Bind, was charged with gang rape under Section 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been in custody since 15 January 2023, after an earlier bail application was rejected. The …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, having been in judicial custody since 3 February 2024. The High Court had earlier rejected his bail application, and this …
Raju Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 376, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He had earlier been granted provisional bail for three months, which expired, and he surrendered on 22 January 2026. The petitioner claimed the FIR was fabricated and that he had …
The petitioners, members of the Basir Khan family, filed an application seeking to quash a 15 September 2009 order that had taken cognizance against them under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They further requested that the trial court be directed to …
Petitioner Pawan Ram sought cancellation of the regular bail granted to Jata Shankar Lal Das (opposite party No.2) in a case involving theft of Rs.10,000 and assault, alleging that the bail order misrepresented the accused’s criminal antecedent. The High Court examined the facts, noting that the …
The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar Bind, is in custody for a dowry‑death case (Sections 304B and 34 IPC) arising from the murder of his wife Runti Devi. The prosecution alleges that the victim’s in‑laws demanded dowry and that the petitioner, his wife and brother‑in‑law strangulated the victim. The …
Manoj Rai was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under several IPC sections (341, 323, 504, 506, 363, 365, 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have participated in indiscriminate firing and assaulting the father of an informant. The petitioner claimed he was not present …
The petitioner, Sitaram Kora, was arrested in connection with a 2021 FIR alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the U.A.P. Act, including rioting, assault, and arson. He contended that the FIR was fabricated, that no specific allegation linked him to the crime, and that other …
The petitioner, Utkarsh Raj, was charged under IPC sections 376(D) (rape), 120(B) and 34 (conspiracy and common intention), and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for alleged sexual offences against a minor. He has been in judicial custody since September 27, 2023 and has filed a third bail application …
Munna Kumar, accused of murder and common intention under IPC Sections 302 and 34, applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court. The court examined the trial record and noted that only two of seven prosecution witnesses had been examined, with the remaining witnesses summoned and likely to …
The petitioner Kailash Agrawal filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 04‑06‑2015 of the Sub‑divisional Judicial Magistrate (East), Muzaffarpur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He …
The petitioner, Utkarsh Raj, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 376(D), 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. This was his third bail application after earlier rejections by the same court. The court observed that the charge‑sheet …
The petitioner, Pandit Kumar, is in custody for alleged murder, culpable homicide not amounting to murder and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 201 and 34. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner helped Manish Kumar kill the informant's brother over a loan dispute and dispose of the …
The petitioner, Seraj, was charged under Sections 302, 201, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a alleged murder case (PS Case No. 371 of 2023). He had been in custody since 6 September 2023 and earlier bail was denied on 25 October 2024. The petitioner contended that the deceased died in a …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated and has been in custody since 30 July 2024. The State and the informant opposed the bail, contending that the petitioner is …
The petitioner, Sarbjeet Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 302, 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody since 4 May 2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected on 7 February 2025. The petitioner argued that he was …
Vinod Yadav was charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 354(B), 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case arising from Paliganj. After three prior rejections of both anticipatory and regular bail, the petitioner sought bail again, arguing that the trial was far from conclusion, only …
The petitioner, Dipak Kumar, was arrested in connection with the death of an informant's husband, alleged to have occurred while the deceased was performing electrical work at the petitioner's house. The prosecution charged the petitioner under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, …
The petitioner, Ramnath Rai, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a murder alleged to have occurred in 2010. He had been in custody since 23 February 2024 and earlier sought bail, which was denied by the Patna High Court on …
The petitioner, Lal Babu Mahto, was charged under IPC Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and POCSO Act Sections 4 and 6 for allegedly raping a woman in her house. After being in custody since August 2024, his earlier bail plea was rejected, but he was permitted to renew the …
Navin Singh was arrested in April 2024 in connection with a case involving assault with a lathi that allegedly caused the death of the victim's husband, leading to charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder (Section 302). The petitioner sought bail, arguing he has a …
Petitioner Sonu Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case involving the disappearance and alleged murder of Raja Kumar, the son of the informant. The prosecution's case relied mainly on the statement of the petitioner's sister, Riya Devi, who alleged an honor killing by the petitioner and a …
Bijendra Yadav, husband of a deceased woman, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related death and charged under IPC sections 364, 306, 201 and 34. He filed a bail petition, claiming innocence and arguing that the FIR contains only a generic allegation against all accused without specific acts …
The petitioner, Darogi Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2018 murder case (IPC s.302/34), illegal arms possession (Arms Act s.27) and multiple offences under the UAPA. He has been in custody since November 2022 and is one of nine accused, six of whom have died. Despite charges being framed in …
The petitioner, Azaharuddin Beig, was charged with several serious offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 506, 307, 427, 120(B)) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly participating in an attack on an informant. He has been in custody since 1 August 2017, with …
Ashok Sharma was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder, for allegedly assaulting the father of an informant with a kulhari, resulting in death. The petitioner sought regular bail after an earlier bail application was rejected, arguing that only four of ten …
The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged dowry death of his wife, Muskan Kumari, under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 (corresponding to IPC Sections 304B and 34) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was …
Manish Kumar Gupta, the husband of a woman who died under suspicious circumstances, was charged under Sections 304‑B (dowry death) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly participating in her murder and subsequent disposal of the body. The petitioner, who had been in custody since April …
The petitioner, Baidhyanath Yadav, was charged with murder under IPC Section 302, attempt to murder under Section 385 in conjunction with Section 34, and illegal possession of a firearm under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that he shot the husband of an informant, resulting in the …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC Section 414 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 Section 30(a) concerning alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from his vehicle and a mango orchard. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioners, Manish Kumar and Rudal Yadav, were arrested in Bihra Police Station Case No. 207/2023 for offences under IPC sections 364, 302, 120B and 201. Their earlier applications for regular bail were rejected by the Patna High Court in July and September 2024. They filed fresh bail …
The petitioners, Nirbhay Kumar and Sunil Kumar, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 302, 504, 506 and 34 for allegedly assaulting the elder brother of an informant, resulting in his death. The incident arose from a land dispute between neighbours. The petitioners have been in custody since …
The petitioners, three brothers from Mashrakh, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 293 of 2024) involving alleged assault with an iron rod, charged under several IPC sections including 341, 323, 324, 307, 506, 354, 379 and 34. They claimed innocence, stating the injuries were minor and that …
The petitioner, Manjar Miya, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 324, 323, 307, 354(b), 379, 504, 506/34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly causing grievous head injury to an informant with a weapon. He had been in custody since 19 September 2025 and a …
Yogendra Sahani, husband of the deceased, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302, 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the deceased had committed suicide by hanging and that he was falsely implicated. Having been in custody since 2 September 2025, …
Suraj Kumar was arrested on charges of kidnapping a minor girl, alleged under IPC sections 366A, 363, 376 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim voluntarily accompanied him and married him on 29 July 2024. The victim’s deposition …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 405 litres of Nepali country-made liquor near the Kamla river, alleged to be in violation of Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He filed a bail …
Manish Kumar Raja applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where a bank manager’s bag was allegedly snatched. The prosecution’s case is based on a confessional statement of co‑accused Vikash Kumar, which mentions the petitioner, though no material was …
The petitioner, Sarfaraz Ansari, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 306, 292, 500 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged abetment of suicide, obscene acts, defamation and common intention. The trial court had earlier rejected his bail but allowed a fresh application after …
The petitioner, Bhola Sahni, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 374 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 379 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging assault with an iron rod and lathi, and the theft of a mobile phone and gold ornaments by co‑accused. The …
The petitioners, Manish Kumar and Rudal Yadav, were arrested in Bihra Police Station Case No. 207/2023 for offences under IPC sections 364, 302, 120B and 201. They applied for regular bail, having previously been denied relief in July and September 2024. They argued that they had been in custody …
Petitioner Rana Sukanta Kundu, a resident of West Bengal, feared arrest in a case registered under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of spirits, alum and liquor from the houses of seven accused. No liquor or alum was seized from his premises; the …
Vishal Raj, the petitioner, faced arrest in a case involving alleged seizure of 2,240.28 litres of liquor from four vehicles, with charges under IPC sections 272, 273 and 120(B) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Pawan Raj, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 15 of 2020) alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants abducted the informant's driver, looted a Scorpio vehicle and threw the driver into a …
The petitioner, Balam Manjhi, was implicated in a case (Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 570 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 337, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations against him were vague, omnibus and that he had no …
The petitioner, Srikant Rai, was charged under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 330 litres of illicit liquor and two seized motorcycles at a joint family house. He has eight prior criminal cases, five under the excise …
The petitioner, Pratik Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 468, 471, 420, 414 and 34, and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 for allegedly recovering 5,951.8 liters of liquor from five vehicles. He contended that he was not apprehended at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and …
Petitioner Raviranjan Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was seized from a vehicle not owned by him and that his mobile number was used by a friend to commit the …
The petitioners – Nirmal Devi, Vindeshwar Yadav, Roshan Kumar Yadav and Pawan Yadav – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2022 case (PS 260) registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354 and 379/34 for alleged assault on an informant. They contend they are falsely implicated, that …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged illegal liquor possession under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act sections 30(a), 41 and 47. He argued that the charge sheet contained a clerical …
Muzahir Alam sought relief fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 79 of 2023) alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He had been granted anticipatory bail on 18‑Nov‑2025 with a condition to pay Rs 3,000 per month as interim maintenance to the …
The petitioner, Naushad Ahmad, is in custody for alleged offences under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471, 420/34 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a fraudulent Hajj and Umra tour scheme. The FIR alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, misrepresented themselves as reliable tour …
The petitioner, Jitendra Rai, was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 6,168.6 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in his possession, and that the …
The appellant Pradip Gupta was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder and rape of a nine‑year‑old girl in Vapi, receiving a death sentence under Sections 302, 376(A)(B) of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. On appeal, the Gujarat High Court examined the prosecution's case, which relied …
The appellant Pradip Gupta was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder and rape of a nine‑year‑old girl in Vapi, receiving a death sentence under Sections 302, 376(A)(B) of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. On appeal, the Gujarat High Court examined the prosecution's case, which relied …
Mukeshji Ataji Thakor was convicted of kidnapping, rape, and sexual assault of a 17‑year‑old girl belonging to a Scheduled Caste, and was sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 3(ii)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act along with other IPC and POCSO offences. The appellant appealed, …
The petitioners, four members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 504 and 506/34, arising from an alleged assault during a land‑boundary dispute. The informant claimed the petitioners attacked her and her family …
The petitioners, a group of relatives from Hardiya village, were accused in a complaint of entering the complainant’s house, assaulting and disrobing her and family members, and setting the house on fire, invoking IPC sections 436, 376, 194, 120(B) and cognizance under sections 354(A), 427 and 436. …
The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for a series of offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, rioting, and attempt to murder of police personnel. The FIR alleged that Yadav and others attacked police who were stopping tractors carrying sand …
The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.1014 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the informant supplied articles worth Rs.48,50,996 and the petitioner had paid only Rs.13,70,083, with interest …
Petitioner Prabesh Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under IPC Section 414 and several provisions of the Arms Act, based on a co‑accused’s confession. A raid recovered weapons from the co‑accused’s house, but no incriminating article was found on the petitioner and he …
The appellant, Pankaj Kumar Singh, was charged under several IPC provisions and sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and his application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special Judge. The prosecution alleged that the appellant entered the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Ashk, filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 27 June 2019 in Mahila Police Station Case No. 27 of 2018, wherein cognizance was taken for offences under Sections 354A and 509 of the Indian Penal Code after a charge‑sheet was filed. The High Court allowed …
The petitioner, RajVivek Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under sections 310(4), 310(6), 310(5), 111(1) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1‑B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner feared arrest after his name was disclosed by co‑accused persons. The court noted that …
The appellants, four accused persons, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gaya, which rejected their application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …
The petitioner, Amitabh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged recovery of 4,428.72 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession and that the …
The petitioner, Santosh Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 227.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle, with charges under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not the …
Baijnath Sahni, arrested on 2 April 2025, was charged under Sections 364A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping the sons of an informant and demanding a ransom of Rs. 5 lakh. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of co‑accused Urmila Devi, who had …
Om Prakash Kumar, a government clerk, was arrested on 24 July 2023 in connection with a case of alleged embezzlement of Rs. 1,83,84,248.17 and charged under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 409, 420 and 120(B). He applied for regular bail, arguing innocence and that witnesses had not supported the …
Madan Sahani applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, charging him under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
Mithilesh Kumar, arrested on 22 September 2023 in connection with a 2017 rape case (Sections 376 and 34 IPC), filed a bail petition. He claimed a clean antecedent and alleged that the FIR was fabricated, asserting that the victim's medical report did not support the rape allegation, although her …
The appellant, Bindu Devi, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Saran, which had rejected her prayer for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 and Sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …
Kamlesh Kumar appealed to the Patna High Court seeking to set aside the order of the Exclusive Special Court, SC/ST Act, Patna, which had rejected his anticipatory bail application in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 341, 352, 323, 504 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(g)(r)(s) of the SC/ST …
Kameshwar Prasad Sharma, Chairman of Pawa PACS, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.50 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown in Nalanda. The petitioner argued that the allegations of conspiracy were directed only at two named …
Balram Singh, Chairman of Kariyanna PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR names Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as the primary accused for the alleged loss of …
Vijay Krishna Prasad, Chairman of Lohara PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown. The FIR, filed under Sections 409 read with 34 of the IPC, named only two …
The appellants, including Ganauri Mahto and his sons, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and causing the death of an informant's father while using caste-based slurs. They applied for …
The appellants, including Ganauri Mahto and his sons, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and causing the death of an informant's father while using caste-based slurs. They applied for …
The appellants, including Ganauri Mahto and his sons, were charged under several IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 448, 302, 504, 506) and sections 3(i)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the father of an informant and causing his death. They …
The petitioner, Manish Singh, was charged in Complaint Case No. 2040 of 2010 for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 384 IPC relating to a commercial dispute over diesel pump sets supplied to the Bihar State Ward Board. The petitioner contended that the matter was essentially …
Petitioner Krishna Deo Kumar Singh sought quashing of FIR No. 25 of 2020 registered at Taraiya Police Station, which alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 506 and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner contended that an offence under Section 138 can only be pursued by …
The petitioner, a wholesale footwear dealer, was named in a 2005 complaint (No. 1570) alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code for failing to pay Rs. 1,10,442 to the complainant. The petitioner contended that the dispute was essentially civil, arising from a business …
Ashok Kumar, the Chairman of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society (PACS), was not named in an FIR filed under Sections 409 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged disappearance of 16,768.50 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown. He sought …
The petitioner, Md. Rahbar, was named in a 2022 complaint (Case No. 487) alleging offences under Section 498-A of the IPC for mental and physical cruelty, including assault while intoxicated, allegedly over a demand of Rs. 1 lakh. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the complainant, Bibi Rahila …
The petitioner Sanjay Kumar was charged under Section 498A IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Rampur P.S. Case No. 243 of 2016. He was granted provisional bail by the High Court on 15‑05‑2017, but the lower court cancelled his bail bonds on 24‑01‑2018 after an informant alleged …
The appellant, Pankaj Kumar Singh, was charged under several IPC provisions and sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and his application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special Judge. The prosecution alleged that the appellant entered the …
The appellants Algu Sah and Krishna Kumar Gupta were charged under several IPC sections (341, 323, 379, 427, 504, 506) and Section 3(1)(r)(w) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting a man, attempting to outrage his wife's modesty, using caste slurs, and stealing a gold mangalsutra and cash. They …
Mahendra Chauhan appealed to the Patna High Court seeking anticipatory bail after a Special Judge had rejected his bail application in a case involving offences under Sections 353, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act. The State argued that the lower court had already taken …
The petitioners, named in an FIR for alleged murder and conspiracy (IPC Sections 302 and 120B), sought bail after the FIR was lodged 16 days after the alleged incident. They argued that the FIR was delayed, the allegations were vague, and the death was due to a natural cause (brain stroke) rather …
The petitioner, a transport operator, owned a diesel Tata truck that was seized by police on 22 February 2024 while allegedly carrying yellow sand beyond the quantity permitted by a prepaid transport challan. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to release the vehicle and to quash …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, Chairman of a PACS, was not named in an FIR concerning the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown. The FIR named only Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as accused. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, …
Bhola Prasad, the Chairman of the PACS of Malti Panchayat, was implicated in an FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning the alleged misappropriation of rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR charges under Sections 409 read with 34 of …
The petitioner, Shashi Raj Kumar, PACS Chairman, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of rice from a State Food Corporation godown, where two co-accused were charged under Section 409 read with 34 of the IPC. He contended that the allegations were solely against the …
Shayamdev Prasad, Chairman of Nahub PACS, was implicated in a 2017 FIR concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR alleged offences under IPC Section 409 read with Section 34, and the investigation focused on two named …
The appellants were convicted under Sections 304 and 323 read with Section 149 of the IPC for a fatal assault allegedly stemming from a land dispute. The prosecution relied on injured witnesses and medical reports, while the defence highlighted stark contradictions between eyewitness accounts of …
Vijay Shree, the wife, filed an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to her husband, Gajendra Singh, in a criminal case under Section 498A of the IPC. The petitioner argued that the bail was granted without sufficient notice to her and that subsequent threatening conduct …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Raj, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323 and 506/34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging mental and physical cruelty for demanding Rs 20 lakh as a loan to start a business. The petitioner sought bail, contending that the demand …
Ranjan Kumar Kamat was charged with kidnapping, kidnapping for marriage, and related offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. Kamat appealed (Cr. Appeal SJ …
Ranjan Kumar Kamat was charged with kidnapping, forced marriage and related offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. Kamat appealed (Cr. Appeal SJ No.1731) arguing that the …
The petitioner, Arjun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) where he was named as a co-accused. The FIR alleged that he, along with Chhappan Singh and Gautam Ram, lured the informant's son to his house and the son was later found dead. The petitioner …
Bhagamani Devi was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Section 304‑B IPC) alleging her involvement in the death of an informant's daughter over a buffalo demand. The petitioner argued that the allegation was based solely on suspicion, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, and that …
The appellant, Ravi Kumar, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from an alleged assault and robbery on 06.01.2024. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the 1st …
The petitioner, Nagendra Kumar Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment under Sections 498-A, 379, 323, 341, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, with a demand of Rs.10 lakh. The petitioner argued that the allegations …
The petitioners, members of the same family, filed criminal complaints against each other under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 arising from a property dispute. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance in three separate cases, but no charges had been framed and the parties …
The appellants Satish Kumar Bhagat and Qmare Alam were convicted under Section 395 IPC for a dacoity based primarily on a delayed test identification parade (T.I.P.) and the informant’s fardbeyan. The High Court examined the reliability of the FIR, the credibility of witnesses, the absence of the …
The petition filed by Rahul Kumar, a child in conflict with law (CICL), sought bail after the Juvenile Justice Board and the Additional Sessions Judge (Children's Court) denied his bail applications in a case involving alleged rape and other offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The petitioner …
The petitioner Sanjay Kumar was charged under Section 498A IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Rampur P.S. Case No. 243 of 2016. He was granted provisional bail by the High Court on 15‑05‑2017, but the lower court cancelled his bail bonds on 24‑01‑2018 after an informant alleged …
Ram Prasad Singh, Chairman of Cheran PACS, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from the State Food Corporation's godown in Nalanda. The FIR, filed under IPC sections 409 read with 34, named only Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as …
The appellant, Chunni Lal Sah, was charged under Sections 498A, 323 and 504 of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, …
The appellant, a 16‑year‑old juvenile, was charged under IPC sections 376 and 506 and POCSO sections 4 and 6 for the alleged rape of the informant’s minor daughter. The Additional Sessions Judge‑cum‑Special Judge denied bail, prompting an appeal to the Patna High Court. The appellant’s counsel …
The petition filed by Sunil Kumar Singh, a child in conflict with law (CICL), sought bail after the Juvenile Justice Board and the Additional Sessions Judge had denied it on the ground that his release might expose him to criminal association and danger. The petitioner argued that his name appeared …
Badasah Yadav was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for murder. He applied for bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge and later by this Court, which allowed renewal only after nine months. The …
