Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 9801–10000
The petitioners, members of the same family, filed criminal complaints against each other under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 arising from a property dispute. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance in three separate cases, but no charges had been framed and the parties …
The petitioner, Iftekhar Khan, was named in a 2012 complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy (IPC §§406, 420, 120B) for selling a disputed land parcel for Rs. 50,26,000 but failing to deliver possession. The petitioner contended that the land is situated in …
The appellant, Ram Bhagat, was charged under IPC sections 302 and 34 and under the SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) for a murder case (Case No. 278 of 2023). He had been denied bail by the Additional Sessions Judge and the High Court earlier, with a liberty to renew after one year. The …
The petitioner, Aman Vishwakarma, was named in a complaint (Case No. 1038 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 323 and 498A of the IPC for mental and physical cruelty linked to dowry demands. He had previously obtained bail in a related FIR (Case No. 555 of 2023) and was paying interim …
Krishn Kumar Sah appealed against the order dated 03.07.2024 that denied him anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under the IPC (sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 354B, 34) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) and 3(2)(va)). The prosecution alleged that the …
The appeal sought to set aside the trial court's order refusing anticipatory bail to two accused charged with cheating, fraud, assault and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant invested over Rs 6 lakh in a company run by the accused, …
Balram Singh, Chairman of Kariyanna PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR names Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as the primary accused for the alleged loss of …
The petitioners, members of the same family, filed criminal complaints against each other under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 arising from a property dispute. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance in three separate cases, but no charges had been framed and the parties …
The petitioners, Narmdeshwar Mishra and Mohit Mishra, were implicated in Complaint No.1978 of 2023 for alleged offences under IPC sections 352, 406, 504 and 506/34, stemming from a dispute over unpaid commission where the complainant claimed a commission of Rs.14.40 lakh but received only Rs.4 lakh. …
The petitioner, Lakshman Saw, convicted under the TADA Act, IPC and Arms Act for heinous offences, sought premature release after serving over 20 years of his life sentence. The Bihar State Sentence Remission Board rejected his release on the basis of Notification No. 3106 dated 10.12.2002, which …
The appellants, five individuals, appealed against the order of the Special Judge that rejected their application for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 323, 384, 469, 471, 506 and Sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Mr. Bidyanand Singh, a lawyer accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for allegedly siphoning off compensation awarded to railway accident claimants and laundering the proceeds. The prosecution alleged that Singh, …
Furqan Alam filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash criminal proceedings (complaint case 411/2022) pending before the Aurangabad Judicial Magistrate, alleging the complaint by Saima Arfa was false and malicious. The respondent argued that the criminal case was at the …
The appellant, Manish Kumar Yadav, appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Purnia dated 06-09-2022 which had rejected his anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 354 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3(i)(r)(w)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST …
Appellant Deepak Kumar filed a criminal appeal challenging the order dated 22.07.2024 by which the Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Muzaffarpur rejected his anticipatory bail in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No.831 of 2022. The case arose from allegations that a cheque of Rs.1,90,000 issued by the …
The appellant, Nandan Singh, a juvenile aged below eighteen, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 302/34 for assaulting an informant's family, during which a co‑accused stabbed the informant's brother who later died. The appellant contended that, as a child in conflict with law, he is entitled …
Petitioner Pramod Prasad filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of certiorari to quash FIR No. 430/2021 and the cognizance taken by the court, relying on Supreme Court judgments that the FIR did not disclose any offence. The petition also sought to prevent any further adverse orders …
The appellant, a juvenile, was charged with looting a jewellery shop and murdering the owner, along with seven other alleged offences in Patna. He filed an application for bail against the order of the Special Judge dated 08.05.2025. The High Court examined whether bail could be granted to a minor …
Petitioner Goma Kumari Sharma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the police to register an FIR against private respondents for cheating her. The State contended that an FIR had already been lodged on 23 May 2024 under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34 against two of the private respondents, …
The petitioner, Jitan Bind, was charged with murder under IPC sections 304B and 34 and with offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleged to have arisen from a dowry demand for a motorcycle. The father of the deceased initially reported that the petitioner and his family were …
Prince Kumar appealed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that denied him bail in a case involving alleged murder under Sections 302/34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and provisions of the SC/ST Act. The appellant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the allegation of …
Manoj Kumar and Kundan Kishore were arrested in connection with a complaint alleging offences under several IPC sections arising from a Rs 45 lakh land transaction. They contended that the sale deed was executed by Asha Devi, their mother‑in‑law, and that the dispute was essentially civil. The State …
Ranjan Kumar was charged in Complaint No. 5494(C)/2021 for alleged offences including assault, robbery and offences under the Prevention of Witch (Dain) Practices Act, with the prosecution alleging he snatched a golden chain. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, arising from a …
The petitioners, senior officials of L&T Finance Ltd., sought quashing of a cognizance order dated 18‑07‑2023 that alleged their involvement in offences under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the seizure of a Sonalika tractor. The complainant claimed …
The petitioners, Rani Devi and Hemant Yadav, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 30‑04‑2019 in which the SDJM, Madhepura had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A and 312 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act …
The appellant, Ravi Srivastava, was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and a scheduled caste/tribe atrocity for the death of an informant's grandson. The prosecution's case was based solely on the informant's allegation, with no eye‑witness testimony linking the appellant to the killing, and …
Anand Kumar (also known as Shivam and Ritesh) was arrested on 17 May 2024 in connection with a case registered under Sections 376 and 328 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged sexual offences. He applied for bail, which had earlier been rejected by a coordinate bench of the Patna High Court. The …
The appellant, Kare Sah, was charged under Sections 376 and 342 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(w) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly raping a woman while she was returning from the market. He applied for regular bail, but the Special Judge of the SC/ST Act Court …
The petitioner, Satyendra Ram, was arrested on 26‑04‑2025 for alleged kidnapping and assault under IPC sections 364(A) and 34, based on a victim’s statement recorded under CrPC section 164. He contended that the allegations were fabricated and that a co‑accused, Prashant Kumar Singh, had already …
Surdas @ Pintu Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC §§302/34) alleged to be motivated by an inter‑caste marriage. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR was fabricated, with no eyewitness and only a co‑accused’s confessional statement linking him to the …
The petitioner, Lal Vijay Kumar, was arrested on 22 June 2025 in connection with an FIR dated 7 July 2023 alleging offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to forged documents and fraudulent withdrawal of land‑acquisition funds. The petitioner contended …
The appellants Mahendra Sharma, Jitan Sharma and Krishan Nandan Sharma appealed against a Special Judge's order dated 13 May 2022 that took cognizance of offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appeal was filed on 11 August 2022, i.e., …
Varun Paswan, the petitioner, was arrested on 28 April 2025 in connection with a case alleging dowry‑related murder under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated because he is the husband of the deceased, and that the post‑mortem was …
Shatrudhan Kumar was arrested in May 2025 in connection with a 2017 murder case (PS Case No. 273) alleging he poisoned a man to recover a loan, under Sections 302, 428 and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed two days after the alleged incident without …
The petitioner, Nibha Sinha, was arrested on 23 September 2025 in connection with a land fraud case involving forged sale deeds and impersonation, charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. She claimed a clean antecedent and alleged false implication, noting …
The appellants, Santosh Kumar and Devendra Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged rape under sections 376 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and for an offence under section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The victim corroborated the allegation in a statement recorded under section 164 of the Criminal …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife. He contended that the marriage had lasted 13 years, produced two …
The petitioner, Bhola Kapri, was implicated in an FIR alleging illegal storage and transportation of sand, violating Sections 379 and 411 of the IPC, Sections 4(1) and 21 of the MMDR Act, 1957, and Sections 11 and 41 of the BMCPIMTS Rules, 2019. A raid on his land uncovered 1,000 cubic feet of sand …
Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 365, 364, 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail for the third time after earlier refusals, arguing that he had been in judicial custody since May 2024 without any criminal antecedent and …
Petitioner Kailu Paswan was arrested in connection with a theft case (Section 394 IPC) where unknown assailants allegedly stole Rs. 53,000 from an informant. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the FIR named unknown miscreants and that no material was recovered from him, though he had given a …
Rafiyuddin Shaikh was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 by the Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person”. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material showed …
The petitioner, Nilesh @ Semdya @ Shimdyo, challenged a preventive detention order dated 25‑12‑2025 issued by the Surat City Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging he was a "dangerous person". The petitioner argued that no …
Ahmed Raza was preventively detained on 28‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order …
Popat Harishbhai Khokhariya (Mina) challenged a preventive detention order dated 24‑11‑2025 issued by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging he was a "dangerous person." The petitioner argued that no material …
Mohamad Vasim was preventively detained on 25‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person”. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his friend. The petitioner argued that there was no material showing …
The appellant Siddik Ismail Kumbhar was convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and attempt to conceal dead body (Sec. 201 IPC) based largely on circumstantial evidence, a police‑recorded confession, and recovered items. The prosecution's case rested on motive, a "last seen together" theory, and alleged …
The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 323 and 504, and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and insulting a member of a Scheduled Caste. The parties later settled the dispute with community intervention, and …
Vihabhai Panchabhai Patel appealed against his conviction for murder, robbery, and related offences under Sections 302, 392, 397 and 449 of the IPC. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant’s alleged presence with the victims, recovery of stolen ornaments at his …
On 22 May 1986 the complainant Banshi Singh was assaulted and his testicles injured by accused Kailash, while his grandson Rajesh was struck by Ram Lakhan. The accused were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC sections 308 read with 34 and 323 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. Two of the …
The appellants were convicted by a Special Judge for robbery under Section 392 IPC, assault with intent to commit robbery under Section 411 IPC, and illegal possession of a firearm under Section 25 of the Arms Act, based on a night-time house‑trespass and theft of ornaments. The prosecution alleged …
The appellants Narad Singh and Brahmdeo Singh were convicted under sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder the informant Ram Asrey Singh, who was injured during an altercation in 1979. The trial court sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the …
Sabita Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case arising from a police raid where a mob assaulted officers. She argued she has a clean antecedent, was not named in the FIR, and was only present at the scene out of curiosity. The State opposed the bail, citing the serious …
The petitioners, K. Faisal and Md. Basim Ansari, were accused in a case (PS‑183/2023) of assaulting an informant and his parents and committing theft, with charges under several IPC sections. They contended that the case was fabricated due to a land dispute between Gotia communities and that the …
The petitioners, Ankush Kumar and Ravi Kumar, were arrested in connection with a police case involving alleged firing and possession of spent cartridges, and were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case was based on police …
The petitioners, Santosh Yadav, Ramdhayan Yadav and Vishnu Yadav, were implicated in an FIR (Amba PS Case No.150 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming the incident arose from a sudden scuffle over …
The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2021 case alleging criminal breach of trust, cheating and conspiracy under IPC sections 406, 419, 420 and 34. The prosecution claimed they misappropriated money from an informant and failed to execute a sale deed, while …
The petitioner, Anjay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code. An order granting anticipatory bail was issued on 28‑01‑2026, but it incorrectly recorded his village as “Bhagwanpur Bhuski” instead of the correct “Bhagwatpur Bhuski”. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 399, 402/34 and Arms Act sections 26, 35, 25(1‑B)a after four accused persons were seized with firearms. The petitioner argued that his name appeared only because the arrested accused disclosed it, that …
The petitioner, Abhinash Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault and related offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR, lodged six days after the alleged incident, described a general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, while …
The petitioner, Karu Yadav, was named in an FIR (Rajgir P.S. Case No.56 of 2023) for alleged offences including attempt to murder, rioting, assault and unlawful possession of arms arising from a dispute over idol immersion during Saraswati Puja. The prosecution alleged that six named accused, …
The petitioners, Akhtari Khatoon and her sons, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No.29 of 2024) registered under IPC sections 457, 380 and 34. The FIR was based solely on the testimony of a neighbour, Ekram Alam, who claimed to have seen the accused fleeing, and …
The petitioners, four villagers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where a 19‑year‑old named Aakash Raj died from an electric shock while fishing in the Loai River. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners deliberately passed electric current through the river, causing the death, …
Sachin Kumar was charged under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for an alleged robbery and shooting incident. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, with the only incriminating material being the confessional statement of co-accused Indrajeet …
The petitioners, four members of the Patel family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 191 and 190 of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged assault over a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar (also known as Golu Mahto), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code relating to the murder of a informant’s son. The FIR named only the co‑accused Krishna Mahto, and the petitioner’s name …
The petitioners, nine male relatives from Alawal Chak, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34. The FIR alleged that they entered the informant’s house, abused and assaulted her family, causing injuries. The petitioners contended …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under sections 420, 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of public money. The FIR was lodged on 1 February 2021, but the petitioner approached the Patna High Court for bail only on 9 …
The petitioner, Md Naimuddin, was accused in a 2024 case of rape, criminal intimidation and false evidence under Sections 376, 406 and 493 of the IPC. He contended that the allegations were fabricated, arising from a dispute over a money loan, and that the police investigation had concluded the case …
The petitioner, Jitendra Das, aged about 65, was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118, 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged assault with an iron rod. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused injured an informant, but …
Vivek Sahni was arrested on 2 July 2023 in connection with a robbery alleged to have been committed on 24 April 2023, for which he was charged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (initially under Section 392). The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that his name …
Petitioner Parshuram Singh, a bus conductor, was implicated in a theft case (Town P.S. Case No. 284 of 2024) under Section 379 IPC for allegedly stealing a mobile phone and jewellery bag from an informant. The petitioner contended that the allegation was false, no material was recovered from him or …
Khurshid Siddiqui was arrested in a case of alleged robbery under Section 392 of the IPC, where two unknown persons on gunpoint allegedly looted Rs.3,50,000 from a motorcyclist. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, no stolen money or the alleged …
The Patna High Court heard bail petitions of several accused arising from Dinara Police Station Case No. 364 of 2025, where a mob of about 200 persons allegedly attacked the police station and injured an informant. The petitioners were charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 121(2), …
The petitioner, Pratibha Kumari, was implicated in a FIR (Bibhutipur PS Case No.119 of 2025) for allegedly submitting a forged BTET certificate to obtain a Panchayat Teacher appointment in 2014, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. She contended that the certificate was genuine, that …
The petitioners (seven individuals) applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2024 police case alleging offences under various IPC sections, claiming false implication and a land dispute that led to a scuffle. One petitioner, Sipahi Yadav, was arrested during the pendency, rendering his …
The appellants, Lalit Kumar and Jitendra Kumar, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for allegedly demolishing a hut, looting property, and threatening a woman with caste-based abuse in a land dispute. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge, …
The petitioner, Vikash Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault and theft under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the dispute arose from wage issues and that the employer fabricated the charges to compel work. The …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (PS Case No. 975 of 2022) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to fraudulent sale deeds. The FIR alleged that co‑accused executed six sale deeds …
The petitioner, Ravi Pandit, sought bail in a complaint case filed by his wife alleging dowry harassment and assault under IPC sections 498A, 323, 341/342. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner threw the complainant out of the matrimonial home to demand dowry, while the petitioner claimed the …
Sachchidanand Singh was arrested in connection with a 2019 complaint alleging cheating under Section 420 IPC for allegedly impersonating a co‑owner to mortgage land and obtain a Rs 5 lakh loan from Madhya Gramin Bank. The petitioner contended that the loan was secured only against his share of the …
The petitioner, Pappu Giri, was named in an FIR for murder (IPC s.302 read with s.34) and an offence under the Arms Act (s.27) arising from a land‑dispute incident in which a co‑accused, Chandan Ram, fired the fatal shot. The petitioner contended that the FIR only specifically implicated the …
The petitioners, three relatives of accused Akeel Rumani, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 406 and 420 concerning a disputed marriage negotiation and alleged money transfer. The FIR specifically alleges that the money was transferred into Akeel …
The petitioners, three women from Bhith village, were arrested after allegedly assaulting police officers and helping a male accused escape during a liquor‑smuggling raid on 24‑10‑2025. They were charged under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for offences …
Arvind Kumar Singh was arrested on 2 July 2023 in connection with a robbery‑with‑firearm case (Sections 395 and 397 IPC, originally under 392 IPC) arising from a FIR dated 24 April 2023. The prosecution alleges that two miscreants on a motorcycle looted Rs. 50,000 from an informant at gunpoint, and …
The petitioner, Amit Raj, was arrested in connection with a 2018 murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) where a youth died after being thrown from a roof. The FIR was lodged a month after the incident, with no family statements, post‑mortem report, or eyewitness testimony. Two co‑accused had already …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) based solely on the confessional statement of a co-accused, as his name does not appear in the FIR. The prosecution alleged that the co-accused Abhishek Kumar abducted the informant's son, whose body was …
Mithilesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 498A and 34 of the IPC, alleging cruelty and extortion against his sister-in-law Dilkhush Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, attempted to force a relationship, demanded money and a …
The petitioner, Avdhesh Sah, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a 2019 case alleging criminal breach of trust, forgery, cheating and related offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467 and 468. He was accused of diverting government funds to his cousin and a brick‑kiln firm and tampering …
The petitioner, Neha Kumari, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Govindganj P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025) where the accused allegedly lured an informant and his friends, seized cash, a gold chain and a mobile phone. The prosecution alleged that the robbery was carried out by Chandan Singh …
The petitioners, Shashi Kant Tiwary and Chandan Tiwary, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 170 of 2022, which alleged offences under IPC sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution claimed the petitioners were among twelve …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a 2015 case alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 384 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly obtaining a liquor‑shop licence in the name of an informant and evading taxes. The petitioner contended that the …
The petitioner, Md. Tazmul, was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Jogbani P.S. Case No. 144 of 2020) under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the IPC. He applied for bail, contending that he was not named in the FIR, has a clean antecedent, and that the allegations are fabricated. The State …
The petitioner, Sunil Ray, was arrested in connection with a case involving the recovery of 1,000 litres of spirit from a pick‑up vehicle, alleged to be offences under IPC Sections 274 and 275 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was neither the owner nor …
Vikash Kumar was charged with blackmail, extortion, and the unlawful dissemination of objectionable videos, invoking sections 341, 448, 504, 506, 323, 354(D) of the IPC and section 67 of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that he threatened to upload the complainant’s private …
The petitioner, Banti Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 395 IPC for alleged dacoity, looting, and assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused stormed the informant's house, tied the informant and his wife, and stole ornaments, cash and a …
Manuu Ram was named in a 2019 complaint (Case No. 510) under Section 498-A IPC for alleged mental and physical cruelty related to dowry demands. He contended that the complainant, Basanti Devi, had been living in adultery with Kishun Ram since 2016 and that the 498-A case was a false, omnibus …
The petitioner, Raj Kishore Rahi, a deed writer, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating under IPC sections 420, 471 and 34, accused of preparing a false sale deed for land claimed by the complainant. He contended that he was merely a witness to the civil transaction and had no role in the alleged …
The petitioner, Baijnath Thakur, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault on an informant using a farsa, resulting in a forehead injury. He contended that the incident was a free‑fight and that there was no intention to cause death, citing medical evidence that the injury was simple. …
The petitioner, Shatrujeet Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating of Rs.1,62,000 under IPC sections 323, 406, 420 and 34. The complainant claimed the petitioner failed to provide a promised dealership, but the petitioner’s counsel argued the matter was essentially civil and had been settled …
The petitioner, Sandip Manjhi, was named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping of a 16‑year‑old girl with intent to commit illicit intercourse or marriage, under IPC sections 366‑A read with 34 and POCSO Act section 8. He sought bail, contending that the primary allegation of sexual assault pertained to …
Mukesh Sah and Lalji Sah were named in an FIR for the alleged murder of a man's husband, charged under IPC sections 302 read with 34 and Arms Act section 27. The informant alleged the petitioners shot the victim, but the petitioners contended there was only suspicion and highlighted their clean …
The petitioners, three women from Bhattha Mohamadpur, were named in an FIR under IPC sections 363 and 366-A for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant to facilitate illicit intercourse or marriage. They contended that the marriage was consensual, as the girl was in love with the son …
Sheo Baitha filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 07-06-2016 passed by the ACJM‑cum‑Sub Judge and the subsequent order dated 11-09-2017 passed by the Sessions Judge in a case arising under sections 386, 392, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the orders …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Chaurasia, was implicated in a complaint (No. 2443 of 2022) alleging cheating through a dishonoured cheque of Rs.55,000 and offences under several IPC sections. He contended that the cheque was never presented to the bank and that no bank memo existed, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Sunil Pandit, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of the order dated 28 July 2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under various sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act against him and another accused. The petition argued that the matter had become …
The petitioners, Abhinav Shourya and Sunita Devi, filed criminal miscellaneous applications seeking bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1101(C) of 2023, which alleged multiple offences including dowry harassment and cruelty under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioners, Abhinav Shourya and Sunita Devi, sought bail in two criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from a complaint (Case No. 1101(C) of 2023) alleging multiple offences including dowry harassment, cruelty, and other IPC offences. The complainant alleged that Abhinav subjected her to …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar Pandey, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 13 August 2018 that had taken cognizance against him under Sections 498(A), 307 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition argued that he had already been …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19 June 2018, wherein the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance against them under Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The petitioners, Pintu Rai and Deepak Rai, were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that they overtook and stopped the vehicle of an informant and his deceased relative, after which co‑accused Rajiv Rai and Bhola …
Riya Singh filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 22 September 2017 passed by the First‑Tier Court (FTC‑II) Buxar, which had set aside the cognizance taken by the SDJM under Section 498A IPC. The petition argued that the underlying …
Abu Bakar Siddique was named in a criminal complaint (C.A. No. 451 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and 498-A for mental and physical cruelty stemming from a dowry demand of Rs.2 lakh. The petitioner argued that the complaint was false, unsubstantiated by an affidavit, and …
The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR registered on 23 May 2014 under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. The court observed that the criminal trial arising from the FIR had already concluded, with the accused being acquitted on 20 December 2024. Since the substantive case was disposed, the …
Ravi Kumar was named in an FIR under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 498‑A of the Indian Penal Code for alleged physical and mental cruelty after the birth of a female child and for demanding a four‑wheeler vehicle. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the allegations were vague, arose after ten …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 31 March 2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, which had taken cognizance of several IPC offences (341, 323, 504, 506, 354(B), 379, 452 and 34). The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Md. Mumtaz Alam, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging mental and physical cruelty for non‑payment of a Rs.2 lakh dowry demand. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the informant had …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 18 May 2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 447, 337, 427, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners argued that the criminal …
The petitioner, Birendra Mehta, was arrested in a complaint (Case No.295 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 147, 323 and 420 for allegedly receiving Rs 5 lakh under an agreement dated 10‑11‑2020 and failing to execute a sale deed. The petitioner contended that the matter was essentially a …
The petitioners, four accused persons, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 29 November 2017 that had taken cognizance against them under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had already disposed of the case …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 24 May 2017 that had taken cognizance against them under Sections 323, 379, 504 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code. The lower court had already disposed of the complaint case and the …
The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought bail in a case involving alleged offences of dacoity, attempt to murder, and illegal possession of arms, based on an FIR where his name appeared only through a co-accused's confessional statement. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the …
The petitioner, Jai Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 Oct 2017 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (VI) Bhojpur, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 297 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The petitioner, Raj Aryan, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 25 August 2017 that had taken cognizance against him under Section 417 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court later reported that the complaint case …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of FIR No.128 of 2017 lodged at Brahmpur Police Station, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 and Section 3(1)(R)(S) of the SC/ST Act. The petitioners argued that the FIR had become infructuous …
Manish Kumar Singh applied for regular bail in a case involving murder (IPC s.302) and an offence under the Arms Act (s.27). He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his police‑recorded confessional statement should not be considered evidence; he also pointed out …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder and sought bail. An earlier bail application was rejected due to allegations of assault on an informant's son. A recent report indicated that three of six charge-sheeted witnesses had been examined and …
The appellant Sunil Kumar was convicted in a murder case (Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 272 of 2024) involving the death of a son found on a railway line. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, along with co‑accused, had threatened the victim, and a confessional statement of another accused named the …
The petitioner, Amit Singh, was arrested in connection with a POCSO case alleging rape of the informant's minor daughter, charged under IPC sections 376D, 354C, 506, 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated due to a prior dispute, highlighted …
The petitioner, Gadar Singh, was charged under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged involvement in a robbery and shooting incident on 25-12-2021. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement of a co-accused, with no direct evidence such as a TIP or recovered incriminating …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 835 of 2023) under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he had no criminal antecedents and was falsely implicated due to his relationship with the victim, asserting that no CCTV footage …
The petitioner, Md. Moin, owner of the now‑closed Rahat Medical Stores, was named in an FIR for possession of 74 cartons of banned codeine cough syrup seized from a vehicle linked to co‑accused. He contended that his shop had been shut since June 2021, the licence not renewed, and that business …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 504, 506 of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act for allegedly demolishing a house with dynamite, forcibly entering the premises, and threatening the …
The appellants Ramesh Prasad Sinha, Punam Devi and Atul Kumar Sinha appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant, Jyoti Kumari, alleged caste‑based abuse, …
Abhijit Yadav was arrested on 16‑12‑2020 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 201, 120(B)/34 IPC) and has been in custody for over five years. The prosecution’s case is based on the suspicion of an informant and lacks any eye‑witness testimony; out of five charge‑sheet witnesses, only …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Soni, was implicated in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 354(c), 354(a), 34 and IT Act sections 67(A), 67(B) for allegedly supplying an obscene video to an informant. The informant claimed she received indecent material from an unknown number and suspected the …
Milky Kumar was arrested for theft of jewellery valued at approximately Rs.10 lakh and charged under sections 305 and 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded innocence, asserting that the gold chain and rings recovered from him were purchased by him on 04.06.2025, as evidenced by a purchase …
The petitioners, Pradeep Singh, Kusum Devi and Chandradeep Singh, feared arrest in a case arising from a land dispute where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant and his family. They contended that the injuries were minor and that the matter could be settled amicably, invoking the Supreme …
The petitioners, three Yadav brothers, were implicated in a FIR alleging looting of wheat, assault with iron rods, and theft of valuables, leading to charges under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and the IPC. They contended that the dispute was purely a civil land matter and sought …
The petitioner, Md. Kamre Alam, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 365 and 34 relating to alleged kidnapping, rape and common intention. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, was recovered pregnant, had eloped with a man named Prince who is in custody, and reportedly does …
Chandan Yadav was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, robbery and other offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that he, along with others, assaulted an informant for not performing an orchestra, causing only simple injuries. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Md. Nasir Ansari and his wife Hamrul Nisha, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case involving serious offences under the Indian Penal Code arising from a land dispute. The FIR alleged that the petitioners, along with others, assaulted the informant’s husband with blunt weapons, …
Shubham Singh and Anil Singh, neighbours in Samastipur, feared arrest in a case (PS Singhiya Case No. 88 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and the IPC, including assault and attempted murder. They claimed innocence, asserting the dispute stemmed from a …
Awadhesh Prajapati was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 191(3), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 76, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting Shyam Sundar Prajapati and his wife with a stick, causing injuries. The petitioner claimed he was falsely …
The petitioner, Shajad Alam, sought protection from arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and the IPC, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others attacked the informant …
The petitioner, Shani Kumar Srivastava, was charged under Section 85 of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (corresponding to Section 498A IPC) for alleged dowry harassment, assault, and a second marriage. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, denying the allegations. Both parties expressed a desire to resolve …
The petitioner, Anil Mahto, sought regular bail in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 436 and 304 for allegedly setting fire to an informant's hut, resulting in the death of a two‑month‑old baby. The prosecution alleged that six accused, including the petitioner, were responsible for the …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, filed a pre‑arrest bail application in the Patna High Court in connection with a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, causing the informant's death. The FIR alleged direct involvement of the …
The petitioners Sawan Kumar, Sajan Kumar and Golu Kumar were implicated in a FIR alleging assault with intent to kill under several IPC sections and sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, arising from a land‑dispute scuffle. They claimed innocence, asserting the allegations were false and …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 342, 323, 324, 327, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he and four others kidnapped and assaulted an informant, stole money and attempted murder. The prosecution alleged that the accused …
The petitioner, Rigendra Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A, 406 and 34 of the IPC. The informant, Soni Kumari, alleged physical and mental torture by the …
The petitioner, Dr. Md. Jarar Alam, a medical practitioner, was accused in Mahila P.S. Case No. 35 of 2023 of raping a woman after rendering her unconscious with an injection, videographing the act, and blackmailing her for Rs. 2 lakh. The FIR, filed on 4 September 2023, alleged offences under IPC …
The petitioners, five residents of Pagara village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Vijayipur PS Case No. 298 of 2025) involving offences under sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the IPC and provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The FIR alleged …
Nagendra Sharma was arrested in connection with a 2015 case alleging that he supplied illegal arms to co‑accused Ranjeet Kumar, invoking IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120‑B as well as Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a and 26. The petitioner pleaded innocence, claiming he is a farmer with no criminal …
Omkar Pandey applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Uchkagaon PS Case No. 158 of 2017) alleging offences under Section 307 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR did not name him, and he learned of the pending case only after a Section 82 CrPC process. He approached the District Court …
The petitioner, Niranjan Mandar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 48 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault with a sword and robbery. The prosecution alleged that on 13 March 2025 the petitioner and five others assaulted …
Vikash Kumar was initially implicated in a murder case (Pipariya P.S. Case No.31 of 2019) under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After investigation, the final report exonerated him, but the magistrate proceeded to take cognizance despite the exoneration. Fearing arrest, the petitioner …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl, with charges under IPC sections 366(A), 504, 506, 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 7. The victim, now a mother of a ten‑year‑old child, testified that she voluntarily went with the petitioner, married him at age …
Vishambhar Nath Dubey, an assistant in PEERS and DE-PEERS Allied Corporation Ltd., was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 468/34 and Section 3 of the Bihar Protection of Interest of Depositors Act for alleged cheating of depositors. The petitioner argued that he merely collected money and had no …
The petitioner, Sujita Kumari, was implicated in a case (Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2025) alleging that she used a fake mark‑sheet to obtain a primary school teaching appointment, attracting charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. She contended that she had submitted a genuine …
The petitioner, Deepak Yadav, was charged under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly stabbing Ravi Yadav, who later died. The petitioner sought bail after being in custody since April 2025, claiming he was falsely implicated due to a prior land dispute and that the …
The petitioner, Sarvajeet Chaudhary, was charged in a case involving the robbery of a State Bank of India branch and assault of bank staff, alleged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is that unknown persons, on gunpoint, looted …
The petitioners, Chandrakishore Chaudhary and Shashi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a motorbike collision that escalated into an assault, with charges under several IPC sections. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant's brother with an iron rod, causing …
The petitioner, Narendra Kumar (alias Nakesh Yadav), sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in illegal sand mining and storage, with offences under IPC sections 379 and 411, the MM(DR) Act 1957 section 22 and the B.M. Rule 2021 section 56. He argued that his name …
The petitioner, Sourav Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 504, 506 and 498A/34, and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with a dowry‑related dispute. He applied for bail, asserting his innocence, lack of prior criminal record, cooperation with the investigation and …
The petitioners, Sima Devi and Chhotu Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case (Shahkund P.S. Case No. 211 of 2023) alleging their involvement in offences under Sections 302, 328 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case rests on a fard‑beyan by an informant who claimed his son died …
The petitioner, Naushad Alam, was arrested in a raid that recovered cannabis, firearms and ammunition, leading to charges under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC, Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, and Sections 8, 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Thakur, feared arrest in a 2016 case (PS No.46) involving multiple IPC offences (Sections 448, 341, 326, 307, 379, 506/34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed innocence, stating that the dispute had been settled as the parties are agnates. The informant …
The petitioner, Soni Kumari, was accused in Patliputra Police Station Case No. 383 of 2018 of manufacturing a forged appointment letter, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 379 and 34. She feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness …
The petitioner, Manoj Sao, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2011 case alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and common intention under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34. The prosecution’s FIR states that the petitioner’s father, Rajendra Sao, lured a victim with a promise of work, …
The petitioner, Nandu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 304 and Arms Act section 27, where the FIR alleged he ordered an attack that resulted in firing and a bomb explosion. He contended that the investigation report cleared him, no …
The petitioner, Md. Allauddin, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 case (PS No. 158) filed under Sections 401, 413, 414, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner committed theft after conducting …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Sah, was charged in a complaint dated 15‑09‑2023 for offences under IPC sections 406, 324, 504, 498A, 323 and 379 arising from alleged marital cruelty and illicit relationship. He pleaded innocence, claimed no prior criminal record and asserted that the case stemmed from …
The petitioner, Bhishma Singh, filed an application fearing arrest in connection with Didarganj Police Station Case No. 423 of 2023, which was originally registered under IPC Sections 341, 323, 379, 506/34 and later taken in cognizance under Section 307 (attempt to murder). The prosecution alleged …
The petitioners, five brothers, were charged in Barahiya P.S. Case No.139 of 2022 under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504 and 34 for alleged assault, with the first petitioner, Ram Parvesh Singh, specifically accused of attacking an informant with an axe. An anticipatory bail application was filed for …
Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving theft, forgery and common intention (IPC §§ 379, 414, 467, 468, 471, 34). The FIR alleged that a stolen vehicle was recovered and two persons were arrested; the petitioner’s name was mentioned …
The petitioner, Sardar Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Kumar and others brutally assaulted Surendra Yadav, causing a fractured left …
Dasai Ram, who is not named in FIR No.337 of 2024, feared arrest in a case involving sections 406, 420, 467‑471 and 120B of the IPC. The main accused, Ramesh Kumar, had been granted provisional bail and the dispute was settled through a mediation report filed before the court. The petitioner sought …
The petitioner, Ramchandra Pandit, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 324, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused entered the informant's house and assaulted her and her family with an iron rod, and …
The petitioner, Tuntun Tanti, was implicated in a case (PS Matihani Case No. 120 of 2023) involving offences under several IPC sections, including assault and robbery. He contended that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident and that the injuries reported were minor, not supporting …
The petitioner, Sabbir Alam, was charged under IPC sections 498A, 406, 34 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry harassment and related offences. He contended that the complaint was false, that he had no prior criminal record, and that he was willing to support his wife and …
The petitioner, Nirmal Ram, was charged under several IPC sections including assault, robbery, attempt to murder, and criminal intimidation. He alleged that the injury caused to the informant was simple and highlighted his clean antecedent. Fearing arrest, he applied for bail, which the State …
Kashyap @ Pintu Gopalbhai Shah was preventively detained on 30‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public …
The High Court of Gujarat examined a petition filed by Sonu Manishbhai (also known as Nazrumal) challenging his preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detaining authority had labeled him a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) based on two criminal …
Sumit Thakur was detained on 27-12-2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, order or tranquility and that the order was passed …
Sarfaraz @ Guddi was preventively detained on 21‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Dhirubhai Ramabhai Nayka by the Sessions Court, which had found insufficient evidence to prove his involvement in the alleged attempt to murder and insult of his live-in partner, Dhaniben, who suffered severe burns after a dispute. The prosecution …
The State appealed the acquittal of Kanubhai Ganpatsinh Parmar and others for the murder of Dolatsinh, alleging that they conspired and killed him using sticks, iron pipes and strangulation, and then attempted to stage the death as an accident. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial …
The State appealed the acquittal of Divyakant Arjunbhai Parmar, a police sub‑inspector, who had been charged under Sections 302 and 323 IPC for murder. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony and medical evidence that the deceased died from abdominal injuries allegedly inflicted by the …
The Applicants filed a criminal application seeking the court to call for investigation papers and to quash the charge sheet filed under Sections 395, 458 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code in FIR No. 198 of 2019. They alleged that the investigation papers were improperly seized and that the charge …
The petitioners, including the husband, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of FIR No. 424 of 2018 registered at Malad Police Station under Sections 498A, 406, 420, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and the …
The petitioner, Vaishali Anil Tikam, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a writ of certiorari to quash FIR No. 188 of 2025 registered under Sections 406, 408, 409, 420, 34 IPC and Section 1860. After …
Kuldeep Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2018 fraud case (Crime No.164) involving alleged impersonation of government officials and cheating Rs.59 lakh, punishable under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34. The prosecution alleged his participation, while …
The applicant, accused in a criminal case (C.C. No.2358/PW/2023) under sections 389 and 504 of the IPC, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashal of the proceeding. The applicant and Respondent No.2 had settled their dispute, and Respondent No.2 submitted a notarised consent …
Manasi Inamdar filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 0385/2023 registered for offences under Sections 279 and 337 of the IPC. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a chargesheet had been filed. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking to quash the FIR, charge-sheet and criminal proceedings (Police Case No. 949/Pw/2017, CR No. 292/2016) for offences under sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter was listed, but the applicants and their counsel …
The appellant, Bhaiyalal Sinh, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed, challenging the conviction on the basis that the prosecution’s case relied heavily on the ‘last seen together’ theory and circumstantial evidence, …
The applicant, Bibhushan Dilipkumar Parija, a senior manager at HDFC Bank, was charged under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide after his subordinate, Jitendra Sharma, allegedly was humiliated and physically assaulted by him and subsequently jumped onto a train. The trial court rejected the …
The applicant, Abdul Gaffar Kurban Khan, was charged under IPC sections 302, 307, 120(b), 212, 201 r/w 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 5, 25 and 27 for allegedly murdering a person and attempting to kill his brother. He had been in custody for over three years with no progress in the trial, while …
The applicant, Subodh Sadanand Ghag, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR (CR No.85 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to a property dispute with his ex‑wife, the first …
The original complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking leave to appeal a magistrate's order acquitting the respondents of offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court held that the …
