Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 16801–17000
The Deshmukh Homes Complex Co‑operative Housing Society Association Ltd. (the Federation) sued Vardhman Park Building No 18 Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd. (Respondent 1) under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960 for non‑payment of maintenance dues. The Deputy Registrar …
The petitioners, Ashutosh Sadanand Karmarkar & Anr., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Samarttha Prisha Properties & Ors. Their counsel, appearing through a V.C., informed the court that the parties had settled the dispute and sought to withdraw the petition. The court examined …
Sai Aadhar Associates filed a writ petition challenging a Civil Judge's order that impounded a Development Agreement dated 7 December 2007 under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958, on the ground that stamp duty was deficient. The Civil Judge had found a deficit in stamp duty and ordered …
The petitioners, Sanjeev Laxminarayan Upadhyay and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of a structure deemed unauthorized. The respondent State, represented by the State’s counsel and the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), …
Madanraj S. Iroya filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant failed to appear at the first hearing on 14th August 2026, prompting the court to adjourn the matter to 18th August 2026 to give another opportunity. The applicant again did not appear on the …
The petitioner, Arjun Vitthal Kudhekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging two externment orders dated 19 September 2025 and 27 March 2026. The petitioner argued that the authorities improperly considered offences that were either under investigation, already acquitted, or too …
In Review Petition No.60 of 2026 arising out of Writ Petition No.5990 of 2006, the respondents argued that the petitioners were unable to appear before the Court due to difficulties they faced. The Court noted that the earlier order dated 25 March 2026 had been passed without hearing the rival …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The applicant, Sunil Chetnarayan Upadhyay, had been granted interim bail by the Sessions Court and filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking regular bail on medical grounds. The High Court observed that the appropriate forum for seeking regular bail is the Sessions Court and …
The applicant, Karan Sunil Goyal, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Mr. Vignesh Ashokan, appearing on behalf of Mr. Ravi Jadhav. The State was represented by Ms. Anuja S. Gotad. During the hearing, the applicant’s …
M/s P.D. Reality filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Secretary of Heera Panna ‘B’ Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and other respondents. The petition sought judicial relief, although the specific relief claimed is not detailed in the judgment. Counsel for …
Vinodkumar Ganpatlal Ajneria was charged with offences under the IPC, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the POCSO Act for allegedly inducing a 14‑year‑old girl into prostitution. He was arrested along with co‑accused after a police raid. The applicant’s earlier bail application had been …
The applicant filed a civil revision challenging a Civil Judge’s order that rejected his application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The applicant argued that the suit was barred by limitation because it sought declarations concerning instruments …
The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of Narendra Narayan Chilkamari dated 17 October 2024 by the Sessions Judge, Thane. The High Court examined the impugned judgment and the supporting evidence. It found merit in the State's request and granted …
The Bombay High Court dismissed several contempt petitions that were filed in conjunction with writ petitions challenging a lower court order. The writ petitions had been dismissed, and the Supreme Court upheld that dismissal. Consequently, the court held that there was no basis to proceed with the …
The Bombay High Court dismissed several contempt petitions that were filed in conjunction with writ petitions challenging a lower court order. The writ petitions had been dismissed, and the Supreme Court upheld that dismissal. Consequently, the court held that there was no basis to proceed with the …
Several writ petitions were filed by different petitioners against various respondents, seeking relief that was ultimately dismissed by the trial court and upheld by the Supreme Court. In response, the petitioners filed contempt petitions alleging non‑compliance with the court's orders. The …
The Bombay High Court dismissed several contempt petitions that were filed in conjunction with writ petitions challenging a lower court order. The writ petitions had been dismissed, and the Supreme Court upheld that dismissal. Consequently, the court held that there was no basis to proceed with the …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court permitted such review of a judgment dated 17 October 2025. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the judgment left no clear formula for apportioning individual …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court permitted such review of a judgment dated 17 October 2025. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the judgment left no clear formula for apportioning individual …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court permitted such review. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment left no clear formula for apportioning individual liability under Section 88, and that mens …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The petitioners, Latesh H. Gada and an associate, were disqualified as members and managing committee members of a cooperative society for five years by the Deputy Registrar under the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, on the ground that they failed to place the 2023‑24 audit report and …
The petitioner, Chandrabhaga Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition against the District Deputy Registrar, Mumbai City, seeking the return of a sanctioned plan that had been produced during the hearing. The petitioners argued that the proceedings had been remanded before the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decision of the Reference Court concerning compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and filed two interim applications. The first sought a direction to accept a court fee challan dated 27 January 2021 as valid, despite its delayed annexation caused by …
The petition filed by M/s. Nilay Enterprise challenged the lower court's view that the respondent could invoke the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 for claims arising before the unit's registration under the Act. The High Court examined whether the respondent could …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, sought to withdraw its first appeal against the compensation awarded to the respondents in a land acquisition matter. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 August 2018) …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, had awarded compensation to the respondent, Vasant Pandurang Tarware. The Reference Court enhanced this compensation, but the enhancement did not exceed four times the original award. The State relied on three Government …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) that set a policy: if the compensation enhancement ordered by the Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, had awarded compensation for a land acquisition. The Reference Court later enhanced that compensation, but the enhanced amount did not exceed four times the original award. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed a compensation award granted by the Reference Court. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) which prescribe that if the enhanced compensation does not exceed …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal challenging the compensation awarded in a land acquisition matter. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) which stipulate that if the Reference Court's enhancement of compensation does not exceed …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018 and 13 Aug 2018) which prescribe that a first appeal by the State must be withdrawn if the compensation enhancement ordered by the Reference Court does not …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, awarded compensation to the respondent, Dhondiram Tulshiram Malgave, which was later enhanced by the Reference Court. The State filed a first appeal challenging the enhancement. The State relied on three Government Resolutions …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018 and 13 Aug 2018) which set a policy that a first appeal by the State must be withdrawn if the compensation enhancement granted by the Reference Court does …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions that set a policy: if the compensation enhancement granted by the Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, the State’s first …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, sought to withdraw its first appeal against a compensation award in a land acquisition matter, relying on three Government Resolutions that set a policy for withdrawing appeals when the Reference Court's enhancement does not …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018 and 13 August 2018) that set a policy for withdrawing first appeals where the compensation enhancement by the Reference Court does not exceed four …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) that set a policy: if the compensation enhancement by the Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Special …
The Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, relating to offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on a Test Identification Parade …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) that set a policy: if the compensation enhancement ordered by the Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions that set a policy for withdrawing first appeals when the compensation enhanced by the Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (Nov 3, 2016; May 11, 2018; Aug 13, 2018) that set a policy: if the compensation enhancement ordered by the Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Special …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, sought to withdraw its first appeal against a compensation award in a land acquisition matter involving Ramesh Tukaram Mahale. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a first appeal challenging the compensation awarded to the respondents. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 August 2018) which prescribe that if the …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed a compensation award granted by a Reference Court. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 August 2018) which stipulate that if the enhanced compensation does not …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decree against Shabnoor Ayub Pathan, filing the appeal 358 days after the prescribed period. The High Court was petitioned to condone this delay and to address interim relief concerning the deposit of the decretal amount. The court, after considering the …
The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal (ST) No.16466 of 2017 after a delay of 358 days, seeking condonation of the delay and compliance with procedural requirements. The appellant also filed two civil applications (Nos.1183 and 1184 of 2018) requesting interim relief, alleging that the entire …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against Ragho alias Ragha Kamlya Koli and others. The court considered two interim applications. The first interim application was allowed in accordance with prayer clause (b) and the court condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The appeal was admitted and the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against Ragho alias Ragha Kamlya Koli and others. The court considered two interim applications. The first interim application was allowed in accordance with prayer clause (b) and the court condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The appeal was admitted and the …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018 and 13 August 2018, which set a policy that a first appeal by the State must be withdrawn if the compensation enhancement by the Reference Court does …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal (ST) No.16553 of 2017 against Shabnoor Ayub Pathan, accompanied by two civil applications (Nos.1189 and 1190 of 2018). The appellant sought condonation of a 358‑day delay in filing the appeal, and the court granted the condonation. The court also …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decree and filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court. The appeal was delayed by 358 days, and the court, after considering the reasons, condoned the delay. The court directed the appellant to file a paper book within one year of the order. In Civil …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal challenging the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, which had been enhanced by the Reference Court. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) that prescribe withdrawal of …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, had awarded compensation for a land acquisition. The Reference Court later enhanced that compensation, but the enhancement did not exceed four times the original award. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, awarded compensation to Shankar Kashiram Kanoje for land acquisition. The Reference Court later enhanced the compensation, but the enhanced amount did not exceed four times the original award. The State relied on three …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal (ST) No.16560 of 2017 against Mahadu Dagadu Jadhav & Anr. The appeal was filed 358 days after the prescribed period. The appellant sought condonation of the delay and interim relief. The court, after hearing, condoned the delay, ordered the appellant to …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal challenging a compensation award in a land acquisition matter. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) which stipulate that if the Reference Court’s enhancement of compensation does not exceed …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decree against Shabnoor Ayub Pathan, filing the appeal 358 days after the prescribed period. The High Court was asked to condone this delay and to consider an application for interim relief. The Court, after hearing counsel for the appellant, held that the delay …
The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a first appeal against the compensation awarded to the heirs of the deceased Tulshiram Kashiram Kanoje. The State relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018 and 13 August 2018) which …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, sought to withdraw its first appeal against a compensation award in a land acquisition matter, relying on three Government Resolutions that set a policy for withdrawing appeals when the Reference Court's enhancement does not …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, relied on three Government Resolutions (dated 3 Nov 2016, 11 May 2018, and 13 Aug 2018) that set a policy for withdrawing first appeals when the compensation enhancement by the Reference Court does not exceed four times the …
The State of Maharashtra, through its Special Land Acquisition Officer, had awarded compensation to the respondent, Eknath Pandu Tarware. The Reference Court enhanced this compensation, but the enhancement did not exceed four times the original award. The State relied on three Government Resolutions …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decree before the Bombay High Court, but the appeal was filed 358 days after the prescribed period. The Court was urged to condone this delay and to grant interim relief because the entire decretal amount had already been deposited with the reference court. The …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decree and sought condonation of a 358‑day delay in filing the appeal. The High Court, after considering the delay, condoned it and admitted the appeal, directing the appellant to file a paper book within one year. In a related civil application, the appellant …
The petitioner sought to amend his plaint to include a claim for removal of an alleged encroachment and possession of land identified in Survey No.15-2B, which the trial court had rejected on the ground of delay and alleged limitation. The High Court examined whether the limitation bar under Article …
The High Court of Bombay considered a bail application filed by Aditya Ravindra Pawar, who was arrested under FIR No.81 of 2026 for an alleged offence under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to the suicide of a 19‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleged that Pawar had entered …
The petitioner, a credit society, filed a writ petition challenging several Income Tax Department orders, including notices under sections 148 and 148A(d), reassessment orders under sections 147 and 144, and demand notices under section 156 for assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20, and claimed that …
The petitioner, a retired teacher, filed a writ petition seeking the grant and disbursement of his pension and retirement benefits, including consideration of part‑time service, and also filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a prior court order. The respondents, representing the …
The Bombay High Court entertained writ petitions filed by Shri Bholadasji Mandir and others against Vishwanath Shankar Vadnekar and others. Both parties submitted consent terms dated 1 August 2026, signed by authorized representatives, trustees, and advocates, with some respondents appearing via …
The petitioners and respondents filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court. Both parties subsequently executed consent terms on 1 August 2026, which were signed by their authorized representatives, trustees, and advocates, and were recorded in a Memorandum of Understanding in Marathi. The …
The High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) and other petitioners seeking the vacation of stays that had been granted in several writ petitions challenging the levy of property tax on telecom sites. The applications were filed under various …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed by the Pune Municipal Corporation seeking vacation of stays granted in a group of writ petitions challenging the levy of property tax on telecom sites. The court ordered that the interim applications be dismissed and scheduled the writ …
The High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) and other petitioners seeking the vacation of stays that had been granted in several writ petitions challenging the levy of property tax on telecom sites. The applications were filed under various …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed by the Pune Municipal Corporation seeking vacation of stays granted in a group of writ petitions challenging the levy of property tax on telecom sites. The court ordered that the interim applications be dismissed and scheduled the writ …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed by the Pune Municipal Corporation seeking vacation of stays granted in a group of writ petitions challenging the levy of property tax on telecom sites. The court ordered that the interim applications be dismissed and scheduled the writ …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed by the Pune Municipal Corporation seeking vacation of stays granted in a group of writ petitions challenging the levy of property tax on telecom sites. The court ordered that the interim applications be dismissed and scheduled the writ …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed by the Pune Municipal Corporation seeking vacation of stays granted in a group of writ petitions challenging the levy of property tax on telecom sites. The court ordered that the interim applications be dismissed and scheduled the writ …
The applicant, Akram Aslam Khan, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking release in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 393 and 34 and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. Although the prosecution alleged him to be a gang leader, the …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), filed a first appeal (St.) No. 22621 of 2019 against Rajesh Damaji Patil and others. The appellants also moved several interim and civil applications (Interim Applications No. 12306 of 2025, No. 6415 of 2026, Civil …
The petitioner, Seema Vasant Gole, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in a minority aided school but the Education Inspector refused to approve the appointment, citing a communication that barred approval of non‑teaching staff until a report on vacant posts was submitted. The petitioner challenged the …
The petitioner, a secured creditor, sought relief through a writ petition. The Court had earlier issued directions on 3 August 2026 directing the handover of possession of the secured asset to the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that these directions had been complied with …
The petitioners, police officers, challenged a Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) order that quashed a circular limiting the validity of a 2013 departmental examination to one year and directed the state to publish a fresh merit list for promotion to Police Sub‑Inspector. They alleged …
The petitioner, Yamini Laxmikant Sharma, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the dismissal of her discharge application (Exhibit-16) filed under Section 239 of the CrPC by the Metropolitan Magistrate and the subsequent confirmation of that dismissal by the Additional Sessions Judge. The …
Koyna Power Ltd filed a suit seeking a temporary and perpetual injunction to restrain Sunil Bhikaji Kanade from disposing of a property situated in Village Chikhaloli, Thane. The Bombay City Civil Court held it lacked territorial jurisdiction because the immovable property lay outside its local …
Durgesh Kore and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, to pronounce the final verdict in Appeal No. 257 of 2025 and Appeal No. 26 of 2026, which were pending before the Registrar. The petitioners argued that the …
Hindusthan Insulators and Industries Ltd filed a writ petition seeking issuance of Form ‘C’ for a Central Sales Tax transaction of Rs.1,23,39,436.70. The State of Maharashtra contended that the petitioner’s representation to the Nodal Officer should be decided within a stipulated period. The Court …
The applicant, convicted of murder under Section 302 r/w 34 of the IPC and Section 3(25) of the Arms Act, sought bail pending his appeal. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses and an extra‑judicial confession, while the defence argued that the identification was delayed, the confession was …
Shagufta Md. Amin filed a writ petition seeking a direction to Malegaon Municipal Corporation (Respondent No.4) to consider and decide her applications for reinstatement dated 13 November 2020, 17 February 2025 and 25 March 2025 within a specified time‑frame. The petitioners limited the relief …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decision of the Reference Court concerning compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and filed two interim applications. The first sought a direction to accept a court fee challan dated 27 January 2021 as valid, despite its delayed annexation caused by …
The applicant, accused No.2 in FIR CR No. 0005/2023, sought quashing of the FIR and chargesheet filed under Sections 465, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the IPC for alleged forgery of rent receipts and illegal transfer of an electricity meter. The original complainant (respondent No.2) filed …
The High Court heard two contempt petitions (CP No.618 of 2025 and CP (Stamp) No.21283 of 2025) arising out of Writ Petition No.11390 of 2023 and Writ Petition No.4390 of 2023 respectively. The petitioners failed to appear on three successive dates despite the court’s earlier order dated 11 March …
On 4 January 2001 a jeep carrying the deceased Manbahadur Khatri collided with a truck on the Manmad‑Shirdi road, resulting in Khatri's death. The widow, children and mother filed a claim against the truck owner and its insurer, while the truck driver faced criminal charges under the IPC. The …
The petitioner, Haresh J. Dharmani, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 26 May 2026 passed by a Judicial Magistrate in a criminal case (C.C. No.1349/SS/2018). The petitioner sought to withdraw the application filed under Exhibit-161 and to file a fresh application after …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) of Raigad, appealed a matter involving land acquisition against LRs Kesarinath Namdev Patil & Ors. The High Court entertained two interim applications (Nos. 12823 and 12824 of 2025) filed by the appellant. Both …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) of Raigad, appealed a matter involving land acquisition against LRs Kesarinath Namdev Patil & Ors. The High Court entertained two interim applications (Nos. 12823 and 12824 of 2025) filed by the appellant. Both …
Petitioner Bhausaheb Kashinath Jadhav filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition, stating that an alternate remedy existed to contest the impugned order. The Court considered whether the petition …
The petitioner, Balasaheb Manohar Vetal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Pritesh K. Bohade, requested to withdraw the petition, stating that an alternate remedy was available to contest the …
The petitioner, Sukhdeo Eknath Nikam, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition, stating that an alternate remedy was available to contest the order. The Court considered whether the …
Abdul Halim Shaikh, who presented himself as a Maulana and Ayurvedic Ph.D., was accused by a 37‑year‑old woman of fraudulently extracting Rs.5 lakh by promising remedies for black magic and subsequently sexually assaulting her. The victim alleged repeated inappropriate touching, intimidation, and …
The applicant, Mr. Ashish Raj, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw the bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court on new grounds. The Court granted the leave and liberty to …
The applicant, Subhash Mesu Sansare, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his anticipatory bail application (No. 1335 of 2022) after it had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 20 September 2025. The court examined the merits of the interim application and, finding no sufficient …
The appellants Harishchandra Bemtya Naik @ Katkari and others appealed against an interlocutory order dated 18 July 2026 that had partly allowed an urgent interim relief application (Exhibit‑8) in a civil suit. The respondents, who were the original plaintiffs, informed the court that they would …
The appellants Harishchandra Bemtya Naik @ Katkari and others appealed an order dated 18 July 2026 of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, which had partly allowed an interim application (Exhibit‑8) for urgent relief and adjourned the filing of a reply to other applications. During the …
The petitioner, Laxman Kanhu Kolhe, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that he had no instructions to continue prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The …
The petitioners filed an interim application seeking to record the legal heirs of Respondent Nos.5 and 8 in Writ Petition No.6304 of 2018. The respondents did not oppose the application. The Court granted the prayer, ordering that the legal heirs be entered on the record and that the application be …
The petitioner, a widow and co‑borrower, sought relief from the High Court to prevent the respondent bank from taking physical possession of her property after the loan taken by her deceased husband was classified as a non‑performing asset. The court initially deferred possession pending a payment …
The applicants, represented by Ms. Deepa S. Punde and Mr. Sachin S. Punde, filed an interim application in the High Court of Bombay seeking to bring the heirs and legal representatives of Appellant No.1 on record in First Appeal No. 797 of 2026. The respondent State of Maharashtra was represented by …
Govind Sakharam Kadam filed an interim application before the High Court of Bombay against Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation. The application sought relief as specified in prayer clauses ‘a’ and ‘b’. The court examined the application and, without elaborating on the factual matrix, …
The matter before the Bombay High Court is Interim Application No. 6347 of 2026 filed in Review Petition (ST) No. 38434 of 2025 and First Appeal No. 53 of 2026. The applicant, Kondiba Baban Gujar, seeks relief against Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation through its Executive Engineer. …
The appellants, Sayali and others, filed an interim application before the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against respondent Upasani. The application pleaded specific prayers, identified as clauses b and c, which the court examined. After considering the submissions of counsel for both parties, …
The petitioners, WeWork India Management Ltd., challenged a revision order of the Small Causes Court that directed the respondent, KGA Investments, to deposit arrears of licence fees for Licensed Area‑2 amounting to Rs 7.14 crore. The dispute arose from a leave‑and‑license agreement where a security …
Vinod Manohar Dive filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant was represented by Mr. Nikhil G. Hire, assisted by Bilal Ansari and Pratik Pawar. During the hearing, Mr. Hire sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on behalf of the petitioner. …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Irfan Basu Sheikh, an Ola driver, who was alleged to have participated in a conspiracy, unlawful assembly with deadly weapons, and assault on police officers during a …
The Business Co-operative Bank dismissed Senior Executive Virendra Vijay Dani for refusing to obey a transfer order and alleged misconduct, without conducting a disciplinary enquiry. Dani challenged the dismissal before the Labour Court, which set aside the termination and ordered reinstatement …
Mrs. Anjanabai Sudam Borate and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Pune Municipal Corporation. The petitioners’ counsel initially sought a pass over the matter. Subsequently, the petitioners instructed their counsel to withdraw the petition. The …
The High Court of Bombay entertained a slew of interim applications filed in several first appeals and special first appeals concerning the Executive Engineer, Hetavane Project Section-1 and the State of Maharashtra. The applications sought various interim reliefs, including directions for amendment …
The petitioners sought a stay of execution of a decree in Special Civil Suit No. 521 of 2014, arguing that the trial court had not decided certain issues raised by the judgment debtors, specifically the nature of possession and the defence of ownership. The Civil Judge, Belapur, rejected the …
Dipak Mohan Phad, a junior clerk in Panvel Court, was arrested for allegedly accepting a bogus court‑fee challan of Rs 18,750 to obtain an heirship certificate, leading to charges of cheating, forgery and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution contended that Phad …
The applicant, Mohammad Azeem Aalamgeer, was charged under Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly killing his friend by striking him with a stone after a drunken quarrel. The prosecution's case relied on a single eyewitness, a brick kiln worker, who claimed to have seen the …
The applicant, accused No.2 in an NDNDPS case, sought bail after being arrested as a pillion rider on a scooter from which MD and ganja were seized from accused No.1. The prosecution relied on the applicant's confiscated phone and WhatsApp chats to invoke the presumption of complicity under Section …
The applicant, Tushiram @ Tulshi Baba Budha Sonawane, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. After hearing counsel for both parties, the court expressed its disinclination to entertain the application. The applicant’s counsel successfully persuaded the court to permit withdrawal of …
The applicant, Kunal Vinod Saude, aged 21, sought enlargement of bail in a case (C.R. No. 450/2025) concerning the death of a young man on 7 October 2025. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with three co‑accused, was involved in offences punishable under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), filed a first appeal (St.) No. 22621 of 2019 against Rajesh Damaji Patil and others. The appellants also moved several interim and civil applications (Interim Applications No. 12306 of 2025, No. 6415 of 2026, Civil …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), filed a first appeal (St.) No. 22621 of 2019 against Rajesh Damaji Patil and others. The appellants also moved several interim and civil applications (Interim Applications No. 12306 of 2025, No. 6415 of 2026, Civil …
The High Court of Bombay entertained a slew of interim applications filed in several first appeals and special first appeals concerning the Executive Engineer, Hetavane Project Section-1 and the State of Maharashtra. The applications sought various interim reliefs, including directions for amendment …
The plaintiff, Ratnesh, sued his brother Shailesh for an injunction restraining the latter from changing the lock on a common passage, alleging obstruction of his access to his portion of a jointly occupied bungalow. Shailesh filed a notice of motion under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil …
The applicant, Tulshiram Sonawane, filed Bail Application No. 3157 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, represented by Advocate Mr. Rupesh A. Jaiswal. The State, represented by Ms. Sukanta A. Karmakar, opposed the bail. The Court noted that an earlier bail application (No. 3140 of 2026) concerning …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Krushi Market, sought to withdraw its writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner had already filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and its 1967 Rules. The court considered whether the …
The petitioners, Heena Qasim Phoplunkar and others, filed an interim application in a writ petition challenging a decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC). The MPSC subsequently issued a recommendation in favour of the petitioners, and the State Government issued an order on 14 …
The High Court of Bombay entertained an interim application filed by the applicants, Atmaram Kaluram Naik (deceased) through legal representatives, against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after considering the submissions of counsel Drupad Patil, Balasaheb Ligade, and Srushti Chalke for the …
The matter before the Bombay High Court is an interim application filed by the applicants, Atmaram Kaluram Naik (deceased) through his legal representatives Madhukar Atmaram Naik & Others, against the State of Maharashtra in Cross Objection (St.) No.1274 of 2020. The applicants sought interim relief …
The petition is an interim application filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Atmaram Kaluram Naik and others against the State of Maharashtra in Cross Objection (St.) No. 2526 of 2020. The applicants sought interim relief as outlined in prayer clauses (a) to (c). The matter was heard …
The petitioner, Mohd. Kaif Mohd. Rafeeq Shaikh, filed Writ Petition No. 4130 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and a praecipe dated 17 August 2026 was filed seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, …
The petitioner, a lessee of a property under 999‑year lease deeds dated 1986 and 2003, challenged a notice issued under Section 53(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 that demanded demolition of a compound wall and removal of alleged encroachment. The petitioner sought …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Amol Laxman Shinde under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He was charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 5 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of …
The applicant, Raj Mohan Shetty, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court initially expressed a disinclination to grant bail. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Sagar Joshi, requested time to take further instructions and indicated an intention to withdraw the application while …
The High Court considered the bail application of Tulsi Yogesh Shinde, a 24‑year‑old mother of a 16‑month‑old child, who was accused as Accused No.10 in a case involving the assault and subsequent death of a victim by members of the Pawar and Shinde families. The prosecution relied on eyewitness …
The petitioner, Sunita Sudhakar Parab, challenged an order of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) dated 4 August 2026, seeking the same benefits accorded to other eligible slum dwellers. The court found that the petitioner is indeed an eligible slum dweller and therefore entitled to identical …
Ashish Bhide filed a writ petition seeking to quash a letter from the Head Mistress of NMV Girls High School and an order of the Food Safety Commissioner, alleging that the authorities might take action against his establishment under the Food Safety and Standards (Safe Food and Balanced Diets for …
The appellant, Sanket Ramesh Shelke, filed a criminal appeal under the Stamp Act 98 days after the prescribed period and moved an interim application seeking condonation of the delay. The State of Maharashtra, represented by Ms S.D. Shinde, waived notice. The court examined the application and, …
M/s. Shivganga Construction & Ors. filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation. The petitioners, through their counsel, initially sought a pass over. Subsequently, the petitioners informed the court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioners challenged a suspension order dated 12 August 2026, issued by the Commissioner of Police under Rules 238 and 239 of the Public Amusement Rules, 1999, which barred them from operating an orchestra for 30 days starting 15 August 2026. They had filed statutory appeals against the …
The petitioners challenged a suspension order of their orchestra licence issued under Rules 238 and 239 of the Public Amusement Rules, 1999, which barred them from operating for 30 days starting 15 August 2026. They had filed statutory appeals against the suspension, but the appellate authority had …
The petitioners challenged a suspension order dated 12 August 2026, issued by the Commissioner of Police under Rules 238 and 239 of the Public Amusement Rules, 1999, which barred them from operating an orchestra for 30 days starting 15 August 2026. They had filed statutory appeals against the …
M/s. Orgo Pharm Chemicals appealed the acquittal of Paramed Private Ltd. and Mr. M.R. Tiwari by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that the respondents could not be traced and that a communication sent to them was …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) that condoned a 15‑day delay in filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The original complaint was e‑filed within the statutory period but was …
Manohar Chottelal Sharma filed an interim application seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal No.1186 of 2025, which had been dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution. The Court examined whether the dismissal could be recalled and whether costs could be imposed as a condition for …
The petitioners challenged the 2022 order of the Divisional Joint Registrar confirming the Assistant Registrar’s 2018 decision denying them membership of a cooperative society in Unit No.515. The Court traced the history of the unit, noting an original 1995 order granting membership, subsequent …
The High Court considered two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Dr. Rashmi Sanghi and Dr. Gopal Kabra seeking quashing of defamation complaints (Criminal Complaint Nos. 521/SS/2015 and 522/SS/2015) filed by the Crop Care Federation of India Limited. The complaints alleged …
The High Court considered two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Dr. Rashmi Sanghi and Dr. Gopal Kabra seeking quash of defamation complaints (Section 500 IPC) filed by the Crop Care Federation of India Limited. The complaints arose from statements made by the doctors on a …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the High Court of Bombay against Villa Nova Barretto and another. During the proceedings, the appellant instructed its counsel to withdraw the appeal. The Court accepted the request and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn. The order also …
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with Civil Application No. 781 of 2019, which sought a stay of proceedings. The Registrar issued an order on 2 December 2019 abating the stay application against several respondents (Nos. 2/1, 2/2, and 2/3 to 2/6, 3/1 to 3/4, 4 to 6). Subsequent orders on …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
Mig Bandra Realtors and Builders Private Limited filed a second appeal against Akshay Pasarkar and others. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal, citing a settlement between the parties. The Court granted the request, disposing of the second appeal as withdrawn. …
Mig Bandra Realtors and Builders Private Limited filed a second appeal against Akshay Pasarkar and others. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal, citing a settlement between the parties. The Court granted the request, disposing of the second appeal as withdrawn. …
The petitioner, a retired teacher, filed a writ petition seeking the grant and disbursement of his pension and retirement benefits, including consideration of part‑time service, and also filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a prior court order. The respondents, representing the …
Mrs. Ujwala Vasant Mane (Petitioner) was appointed as a physical‑education and Marathi teacher in a secondary school in December 2005 on a temporary basis, without approval from the Education Department. She later obtained a B.A. in Marathi and another B.A. in Sociology and Political Science, but …
The petitioner, Chetan Suresh Shinde, filed a writ petition challenging a 2010 order of the School Tribunal that dismissed his appeal against his termination in 2008. The petition was pending without any interim relief, and the petitioner could not be contacted, as evidenced by a returned postal …
The plaintiff, M/s. Kaivalya Enterprises, instituted a suit for specific performance of an oral contract to purchase the defendant's 5/7 share in a land parcel, alleging the defendant reneged by seeking a TDR. The defendant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking rejection of …
The Baroda Rayon Corporation Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging a City Civil Court order that dismissed its notice of motion seeking dismissal of a commercial suit on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. The suit, instituted in 1999, concerned recovery of Rs. 1,70,81,436 from Thermax …
The applicant, Somnath Ramchandra Kondalker, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel initially sought to keep the matter pending to obtain further instructions and later requested to withdraw the application while seeking leave and liberty to approach the court …
The petitioner, Atul Ramkru Gatne, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his private land for a highway improvement work order dated 31 October 2024. The State of Maharashtra, represented by its Additional Government Pleader, argued that the petitioner was in the same position as …
Petitioner Girish Manohar Mokashi filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his counterclaim by the Co-operative Court and the Co-operative Appellate Court. The counterclaim sought (i) admission of the counterclaim, (ii) a statement of his loan and current account, and (iii) refund of a …
The petitioners, municipal employees, challenged two letters that cancelled their promotions, alleging that the cancellations were issued without a reasoned order and amounted to victimisation. They claimed a vested right or legitimate expectation to retain the promotions, which had been granted in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a revised merit list dated 12 September 2023 that was issued following a direction of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT). They bypassed the MAT and directly approached the High Court, arguing that the merit list …
M/s Turtle Infra filed a writ petition challenging its removal from the approved list of ‘C’ class contractors maintained by the Chief Engineer, Southern Command. The petitioner argued that the debarment order dated 22/07/2019 was issued without specifying a time limit, violating the principles of …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita) filed by Yogesh Sharad Kadam, the managing director of Season Worlds, who was charged with cheating offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read …
The appellants filed an interim application seeking withdrawal of the compensation amount awarded in a land acquisition proceeding. The court noted a recent judgment in the same village confirming a compensation rate of Rs.1,725, which was higher than the rate granted by the Reference Court in the …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
The Court noted a 321‑day delay in filing the interim application and, after condoning the delay, allowed the application. Consequently, the writ petition was restored to its original file and the conditional order dated 23‑01‑2023 was set aside. The petitioner’s counsel asserted that all office …
The appellant, Sayali Deepak, filed an appeal that was delayed, seeking condonation of the delay and ad‑interim relief concerning a decretal amount with interest that had been deposited and partially withdrawn by claimants. The court considered the appellant’s reasons for the delay and, finding them …
The appellant, Sayali Deepak, filed an appeal that was delayed, seeking condonation of the delay and ad‑interim relief concerning a decretal amount with interest that had been deposited and partially withdrawn by claimants. The court considered the appellant’s reasons for the delay and, finding them …
The petitioner, claiming to be the daughter of the late Babu Ganpat, sought fixation of a purchase price under Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, asserting that her father was a protected tenant who became a deemed purchaser on the tiller’s day. The Agricultural …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions filed by directors and other individuals (applicants) seeking a stay of criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section …
The High Court considered a series of applications and writ petitions seeking to stay criminal prosecutions under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors of Mohan India Private Ltd, on the ground that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the …
The appellant, Sayali, filed an interim application before the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the respondents, including the Special Land Acquisition Officer No.6 and others. The application pleaded for relief under prayer clauses a and b, the specifics of which are not detailed in the …
The appellants sought condonation of a six‑year delay in filing a first appeal against an award passed by the District Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. They argued that the delay was due to the time taken to obtain a certified copy of the award and to complete internal procedural …
